Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
.)
.f'
afleciion for symmetrical design, and became a powerful advoc.lte of the new modern typographic movement. ln 1928 he wrote his seminal book lhe New Typography, which opened these ideas to the printitrg industry in a
clear, accessible mallner. Theories became rules, while conrplex experiments became simple, reproducible sys-
(\.Ci\ 'i"
V
.f\
pttrityirrr; otrlr:r of tht'Now lylxrqraphy lte sensr:rl an elernerrl 0f fascism.,During the latter part of his life he turned back to the classical typoqraphy ol his early training. \
tou\"q
ow,,Trefu
povrJ{-
clarity did not attain the high level we recluire today. This utmost clarity ,,.."rr".y is today because ofthe manifold claims for our attention *"d. by th. extraordinary ar.nount ofprint, which demands the greatesr..orro*y of.rpE6rr.
Thc gcntle swing ofthc pcndulum bcrwccn ornamcntal typc, cially understood) "beautiful" appearance, and "adornm.oi"
The essence ofthe New Typography is clarity. This puts it into deriberate opposition to the old typography whose aim was $eauty" and whose
,1.6"p*n.*too.oo,
by
--{----"1
rTffi:ffimffi
In the o]d typography, the arrangement ofindivrtuat.r*t, i, ,,rUorair,"ted to the principle ofarranging everything on a central axis. In my historical introduction I have shown that this princi.ple started in the Renaissance
and
has not yet bccn abaadoncd. Its superficiality bccomcs obvi,ous when wc lool at Renaissance or barogue title pages. Main units are arbitrarily cut up: for
tlpe
example, logical order, which should bc expresscd by th. or" sizcs, is rut}lcssly sacrificcd to cxtcrnal forro- Thus thc
oidiff.r.rrt
principar line
contains only three-quarters ofthe title, and the rest ofthe tiile, sizes smalleq appears in thc next line. Such things admittedly
,.t
,.".-l
do not often
Crcrting
th. fbtd
| 35