Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
exemption. The appointments are made before the clearance is received from the UGC. This leads to several litigations. To avoid this, all the State Governments/Universities/Colleges are advised not to appoint such candidates till the clearance is received from UGC. The proposals may be sent to the UGC immediately after the selection of the candidates by the Selection Committee in the prescribed proforma alongwith sound justification (through the University in the case of affiliated colleges) for relaxation/exemption as per UGC norms in a particular subject in which NET/SLET is not being conducted or sufficient number of candidates are not available with NET/SLET qualifications for a specified period only. The appointment letter shall be issued only after receiving the relaxation from the UGC. This may also be brought to the notice of the colleges affiliated to your University. Yours faithfully, (Mrs. Shashi Munjal ) Under Secretry
7. 8. 9. 10.
11. 12.
13. 14.
Note : Comprehensive list of candidates, decision, criterion and recommendations of the Committee to be enclosed. Signature of Principal With seal Signature of Registrar With seal
I.
II. a. b. c. d. e. f.
g. h. i. j. k. l. m. III.
IV.
significant contribution and achievement in the field of the teaching and research may be considered for Merit Promotion, if they have put in a minimum of eight years of permanent service as a teacher of which at least four years have been in the institution where he / she is being considered for such assessment for merit promotion. II. A teacher who has been considered and not selected for merit promotion in the initial presentation could, however, submit his / her work again only after a lapse of three years.
III. College teachers wishing to have their work assessed and considered for Merit Promotion should present the details of their work to their college latest by 31st December, each year. For this purpose, the institutions may keep the profile of teachers with them in which the teachers may at the end of each year indicate the details of their contributions of teaching, research, curriculum development, educational reforms, innovative teaching and other forms of academic work done in the institution as well as the work done in the field of extension and continuing education, sports and cultural activities etc. Improvement of academic qualifications should also be recorded. The enclosed proforma (Annexure) could be used for this purpose and these profiles may be submitted by the college to the university concerned, along with the proposal of the teacher who are seeking assessment of their work, a consolidated report for the period of preceding eight years may be made available, incorporating the major contributions made by the teacher. IV. The Vice-Chancellor or his nominee should refer the proposal of the teacher to at least 2 experts in the subject / discipline concerned out of a panel of names prepared by the University according to the procedure prescribed by the University for such Selection Committees. The evaluation reports from the experts should be kept confidential and should be made available at least three weeks in advance of the Selection Committee. The Selection Committee would consist of the Vice-Chancellor or his nominee, two experts other than the referees and the Principal of the College where the lecturer is working. Merit Promotion be given by the appointing Authority to a teacher only if the Selection Committee recommends the same. V. While considering the proposal of a teacher for Merit Promotion, only merit as defined in Para III may be taken into account. All other factors being equal, seniority may be given due consideration.
VI. The University should generally take a decision on the proposal of a teacher for Merit Promotion as far as possible before the beginning of the next academic year so that such promotions can become effective from the date of the beginning of the next academic session. VII. The promotion given to a person would be personal to the incumbent concerned for the period he serves the institution where he has been granted promotion. VIII.The promotion on merit to a teacher under this scheme will not entitle him to any other responsibility, administrative or otherwise such as Head of Department / Principal, except where he is even other wise to be considered and will also not lead to any other
reduction in this teaching or other work. IX. While promotion a teacher on merit, his salary may be fixed in the prescribed scale of pay for the next higher post with marginal adjustment nearest to the salary being drawn by the promotee, as per usual rules of pay fixation. Since most teachers in the colleges would be in the scale of lecturer i.e. 700-1600, the teacher, on selection for Merit Promotion may be placed in the scale of Rs.1200-50-1300-60-1900 and be designated lecturer in Merit Promotion Selection Grade. X. The financial involvement will vary from State to State but the Commission would assist the Institution in the implementation of the Merit Promotion Scheme by making available on average contribution at the rate of Rs. 600/- per annum per teacher promoted to the next higher level in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the Commission up to 31st March, 1985 only, on the condition that the institution concerned continues implementation of the scheme and meets expenditure on the salary of the person concerned as committed expenditure from 1st April, 1985 out of its own resources or with the assistance of grant-in-aid from the State Government as the case may be.
XI. No. person promoted by the college prior to the introduction of the UGC Scheme and not in conformity with the guidelines laid down by, the commission will qualify for assistance from the Commission. XII. The University would furnish to the UGC, every year latest by 15th August, necessary particulars of the persons promoted in the colleges under its jurisdiction, under the Merit Promotion Scheme for college teachers alone with the evaluation report of the experts and the recommendations of the Selection Committees and also the names of all the persons considered from each colleges, to enable the Commission to consider remitting grants due to the concerned colleges. General The number of teachers promoted under Merit Promotion Scheme will not exceed 33% of the total number of permanent posts in the College, spread over a period of 3 years.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sd/<< Back
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHI 110 002 F.NO. 7-2/2004(PS) January 14, 2005 The Registrar All Universities. Subject:- Leave Rules Prescribed by the UGC for Teachers of the Universities / Colleges Dear Sir, The Commission vide its Notification dated 24 December, 1998 on revision of pay scales, minimum qualifications for the appointment of teachers in universities and colleges, and other measures for the maintenance of standards has laid down service conditions (including leave rules) for teachers. It may please be noted that while issuing this notification, it was expected that entire scheme of revision of pay scales, together with all the conditions attached to it, would be implemented as a composite scheme without any modifications. It has now been brought to the notice of the UGC that some of the universities have not given effect to the Leave Rules prescribed by the UGC as an integral part of the revised pay scales. For implementation of the Leave Rules, it is necessary for the Universities to suitably amend the relevant statutes / ordinances / rules / regulations as may be required. A copy of the Leave Rules is enclosed for your kind reference. May I request you to kindly confirm if your university has implemented the prescribed leave rules. In case, your university is yet to implement the revised leave rules, you may please initiate action for its implementation forthwith. You may also advise the colleges affiliated to your university to follow the prescribed leave rules. I would appreciate if you could send me a status on the same. If you require any clarifications from us on this issue, please feel free to do so. Yours faithfully,
sd/(Ved Prakash) Secretary Encl : as stated above Copy to: State Secretaries of Higher Education with the request to ensuring the implementation of the aforesaid Leave Rules in all the Universities and Colleges in the state. Addl. Secretary, Department of Secondary and Higher Education, Ministry of Human
Revision of Pay Scale and Minimum Qualification of Teachers (Eligibility at Master's Level)
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MAG NEW DELHI - 110002 No.F.1-13/99 (PS) Pt.File 27 Nov, 2001 To The Vice Chancellors of all the Universities The Educational Secretaries of all the States (As per list attached) Dear Sir/Madam, In continuation to the UGC Notification dated 24.12.1998 and Regulation No.F.3-1/2000 (PS) dated 4.4.200 regarding revision of pay scale and minimum qualification of teachers, I would like to inform you that the minimum requirement of 55% marks at Master's level shall not be insisted upon for Principals, Professors, Readers, Registrars, Deputy Registrars, Librarians, Deputy Librarian, Directors of Physical Education, Deputy Director of Physical Education for the existing incumbents who are already in the university system. The minimum requirement in their case shall be at least 50% of marks at Master's level. However, 55% of marks at Master's level should be insisted upon for those entering the system from outside and those at the entry point of Lecturers, Assistant Registrars, Assistant Librarians, Assistant Director of Physical Education. Yours faithfully, (Dr. (Mrs.) Pankaj Mittal) Joint Secretary
(Narain Singh)