25 17

2005 9

Proceedings of the CSEE

0258-8013 (2005) 17-0057-05

TM46

Vol.25 No.17 Sep. 2005

2005 Chin.Soc.for Elec.Eng.

47040

530004

A FLEXIBLE NODE ALGORITHM FOR CRITICAL VOLTAGE COLLPASE POWER

FLOW IN POWER SYSTEM
HANG Nai-shan, LIAO Qing-hua, LI Ru-qi, YANG Liu-lin
(College of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004,Guangxi Privince, China)

[7-8][9]
[10]
g

[10]
g
g g

[10]

ABSTRACT: To the problem of voltage collapse in power

system, the load critical voltage collapse power flow (CVCPF)
algorithm in power system with power mode load is discussed
under the load critical voltage collapse power flow analysis in
this paper. Furthermore, the flexible node power flow algorithm
for load voltage critical collapse in power system, which
provides a quantitative calculation method for operational zone
boundary analysis in large scale power system, is created by the
procedure which includes using the characteristics of critical
collapse power flow of alternating current circuit, evading
collapse branch, setting equivalent flexible node, and
processing flexible equality constrain condition, etc. The
proposed algorithm has been tested and achieved a very good
performance on an IEEE 5-bus sample system.
KEYWORDS: Power system; Critical voltage collapse power
flow (CVCPF); Flexible node; Algorithm

IEEE5
: (CVCPF)

[1-23][1-2]
[3--4][5-6]

2.1
S R 1
rSR xSR(
) SR VS VR
ISR PSRQSR
PRSQRS 1
VR = VS ISR (rSR + jxSR )

VRx = VS ( I SRx rSR I SRy xSR )

(1)

VRy = ( I SRx xSR + I SRy rSR )

(2)

1
P + jQ = V I *
RS

RS

R SR

PRS = VRx I SRx + VRy I SRy

PDF "pdfFactory Pro" www.fineprint.com.cn

(3)

58

QRS = VRy I SRx VRx I SRy

(4)

1 SR (1)~(4)

2
2
PRS = VS I SRx ( I SRx
+ I SRy
)rSR

(5)

2
2
QRS = VS I SRy ( I SRx
+ I SRy
) xSR

(6)

(5)(6)
2

VS
VS2
PRS
2
I SRx
+ I SRy = 2
2rSR
4rSR rSR

(7)

V
V2
Q
+ I SRy + S = S2 RS
(8)
2 xSR
4 xSR xSR

ISRxISRy (7) CP
2
I SRx

RP(8) CQ RQ
OPOQ
OP (VS / 2rSR ,0) OQ (0, VS / 2 xSR )

2
RP = VS2 / 4rSR
PRS / rSR

(9)

2
RQ = VS2 / 4 xSR
QRS / xSR

(10)

(7)(8)

2(a) P1P2 PRS

QRS 1 2
.
VS=VS0

.
VR=VRx+jVRy

rSR+jxS
.
ISR=ISRx+jISRy

PSR+jQSR

PRS+jQRS

1
Fig.1 A simple alternating current circuit

ISRy
P1

CP
CP

OQ
CQ

P2
RQ

(a)

0
ISRx

OP

OP

P2 ISRx

OQ
RP

CQmin

P1

CQmax

(b)

2
Fig. 2 Circle diagram of alternating current circuit

QRS
CQ RQ CQmin
CP P1 2(b)(5)(6)
1 P1
CQ QRS
(5)(6) 1

25

[10]
[10]
2(b) P1
1

CQ RQ CQmax CP
P2 2(b)(5)(6)

1 P2

CQ
2.2
2(b) OQOOP
2

V V
D = S + S
2rSR 2 xSR

2(b)
RP+RQ=D 1
P1
VRx = VS / 2
(11)
VS xSR RQ rSR RP

2 rSR D xSR D
PSR = VS I SRx = (VS2 / 2rSR ) RQ / D

(13)

QSR = VS I SRy = (VS2 / 2 xSR ) RP / D

(14)

VRy =

(12)

2.3
1 RP 0 RQ 0
RP + RQ D

SR RP* = RP / D
RQ* = RQ / D , RP*+RQ*

SR SR R
SR
SR R 2
SR
SR

PDF "pdfFactory Pro" www.fineprint.com.cn

 17

3(a)
S 3(b)PSR
QSR (13)(14) S
3(b)
(9)(10)
RP=0
RQ=0
RP0RQ0 RP+RQ=D,
.
VS

.
VR
S

.
VS

PR+jQR

(a)

PSR+jQSR

(b)

3
Fig. 3 Bottleneck branch equivalent circuit

Pi = Pi (V , ) = Vi V j (Gij cos ij + Bij sin ij )

j =1

n
Q = Q (V , ) = V V (G sin B cos )

i
i
i
j
ij
ij
ij
ij

j =1

n
n-1
4(b)
2n-2 PQ

Pi = PGis PDis Pi (V , ) = 0
i=1,2,,n1,iR,S
(15)
s
s
Qi = QGi QDi Qi (V , ) = 0
i=1,2,,n-1,iR,S
(16)
SR S PQ

4
4.1
4(a) 1,2,,S,,l R
SR
SR
R
QR
4(a) 4(b)
4(b) R (11)(12)

SR
R PRS
S PSRQSR PSRQSR
PRS 4(a) SR ()

PRS+jQRS

S
PR

l
(a)

PSR+jQSR

S
PR PRS

(b)

VR VRxVRy SR
4(b)
R

QR
VSPRSQRS PV
4.2

s
s
PS = PGS
PDS
PSR Ps (V , ) = 0

(17)

s
s
QS = QGS
QDS
QSR Qs (V , ) = 0

(18)

SR R PV
s
s
PR = PGR
PDR
+ PRS PR (V , ) = 0

(19)

VRx = VR cos RS VRx = 0

(20)

(20)(11)(12)

4.3
1 SR
r jxSR
g SR + jbSR = SR2
2
rSR + xSR
SR
PSR = g SR (VS2 VS VR cos SR ) bSRVSVR sin SR

(21)

QSR = bSR (VS2 VRVS cos SR ) g SRVS VR sin SR (22)

PRS = g SR (VRVS cos RS VR2 ) + bSRVRVS sin RS

(23)

QRS = bSR (VRVS cos RS VR2 ) + g SRVRVS sin RS (24)

(11)(12)

2
VR = VRx2 + VRy

4
Fig. 4 Weak branch equivalent circuit

59

(25)

(21)~(25)
(15)~(20)
(15)~(20)
Newton Jacobian

5.1
IEEE 5 5

PDF "pdfFactory Pro" www.fineprint.com.cn

60

[3] 1 r16=0.1,x16=0.2
1~6 4 1~6
6
3
RP0
12 1~6
1.556 pu 6
3.112 pu 0.882 pu
16 63.435

25

P1=4.0 56
2-1
1 1.2437 4.0pu
0.806pu
48.7119
3 P1=1.6
Tab. 3 Node voltages of CVCPF when P1=1.6

V/pu

1
0.6012

2
1.0604

3
1.0132

4
1.05

5
1.05

/()

8.9346

19.1973

4.7756

23.2533

4 P1=1.6
Tab. 4 Branch power of CVCPF when P1=1.6
i-j

Pij/pu

Qij/pu

Pji/pu

Qji/pu

1-2

1.2976

0.6857

1.5231

1.7240
1.0735

5
Fig. 5 Tested system
1 1~6
Tab. 1 Node voltages with maximum active power on branch 1-6

V/pu

0.7889

1.0694

1.0368

1.05

1.05

0.882

/()

34.31

3.525

7.144

7.546

97.75

2 1~6
Tab. 2 Branch power with maximum active power on branch 1-6
i-j

Pij/pu

Qij/pu

Pji/pu

Qji/pu

1-2

2.0459

0.0038

2.3164

1.2528

1-3

1.0661

0.0038

1.2487

0.6354

2-3

0.6836

0.2881

0.6509

0.144

1-6

3.1120

1.5560

3.1120

2-4

5.0000

1.9647

5.0000

2.3821

3-5

4.2978

1.7914

4.2978

2.4585

5.2
4 1~6
5
1 P1=1.6

2 1
2-1
4
34 2-1
1 PRS=1.2976,
QRS=0.5953 RP=11.9684,
RQ=1.4547, D=13.4231
PSR=1.5231,QSR=2.0050
(11)~(14) 2-1

28.1319
1

1-3

0.3024

0.6167

0.4329

2-3

1.4769

0.1992

1.3212

0.2453

2-4

5.0000

2.5247

5.0000

2.9862

3-5

2.8117

2.6188

2.8117

3.0944

5 P1=4.0
Tab. 5 Node voltages of CVCPF when P1=4.0

V(p.u)

0.8060

1.0636

1.0301

1.05

1.05

/()

56.2418

7.5299

9.2897

3.4864

6 P1=4.0
Tab. 6 Branch power of CVCPF when P1=4.0
i-j

Pij/pu

Qij/pu

Pji/pu

Qji/pu

1-2

2.4599

0.5669

2.8653

1.5214

1-3

1.5401

0.6768

1.9758

0.8480

2-3

0.1347

0.1981

0.1330

0.3433

2-4

5.0000

2.3232

5.0

2.7676

3-5

5.5428

1.8047

5.5428

2.8639

()

PDF "pdfFactory Pro" www.fineprint.com.cn

 17

61

[J]200323(8)38-44

Xue Wei Shu JiwuYan Jianfeng et al Cluster-based parallel

simulation for power system transient stability analysis[J]Proceedings

of the CSEE200323(8)38-44

[1] Van Cutsem TA method to compute reactive power margins with

respect to voltage collapse[J]IEEE Trans on Power Systems1991
6(1)145-153
[2] [J]
200020(5)64-66
point of collapes[J]Proceedings of the CSEE,2000,20(5),64-66
[3] [J]
199313(6)40-45
stability in load buses and the weakest bus of the power system
[J]Proceedings of the CSEE199313(6)40-45

[16]
[J]200424(1)1-5
Hou KaiyuanMin YongZhang RuiqiLocal approximation of
CSEE200424(1)1-5
[17] [J]
200424(1)6-10

[4] [J]
200020(4)35-39

Wang ChengshanYu XuyangA method for computing the probability

distribution of fault critical clearing tim[J]Proceedings of the CSEE

Liu ZhuoThe impedance analyses of heavy load node in voltage

stability studies[J]Proceedings of the CSEE200020(4)35-39
[5] Iba KSuzuki HEgawa M et alCalculation of critical loading
condition with nose curve using homotopy continuation method
[J] IEEE Trans on Power Systems19916(2)584-593
[6] Yorino NHarada SCheng H ZA method to approximate a closest
loadability limit using multiple load flow solutions[J]IEEE Trans on
Power Systems199712(1)424-429
200222(3)72-77

[J]200424(3)1-5
Wang ChengshanXu XiaofeiYu Yixin et alVisualization of part of
the static voltage stability region in power systems and its
application[J]Proceedings of the CSEE200424(3)1-5
[19] Chan K W
Cai GuoweiMu GangChan K W et alBranch potential energy method
for power system transient stability assessment based on network

Li YingZhang BaohuiLi MengStudy on electrical power system

stability boundary[J]Proceedings of the CSEE200222(3)72-77
[8] [J]
200121(7)26-30
system and its studies[J]Proceedings of the CSEE,2001,21(7),26-30
[9]
[J]200323(4)1-4

[J]200424(6)13-18

singular

value

optimization

based

on

practical

dynamic

security

region

[J]Proceedings of the CSEE200424(6)13-18

[21] (BCU)
[J]200424(6)35-39

Li Xingyuan,Wang XiuyingFast voltage stability analysis methods

and

dynamic variables[J]Proceedings of the CSEE200424(5)1-6

[20]
Yu YixinZhao YishuLiu Hui et alPower system security cost

Jia Hongjie,Yu Yixin,Wang ChengshanChaotic phenomena in power

equivalence

200424(1)6-10
[18]

[J]200424(5)1-6

[7] [J]

static

method in network structure preserving power system model

transient stability boundary of the power systems[J] Proceedings of the

Zhang YaoSong WennanDetermination of the critical state of voltage

on

[J]200323(9)83-89
Yin MinghuiZou YunThe methodology studies for controlling uep
[J]Proceedings of the CSEE 200323(9)83-89

Guo Ruipeng,Han ZhenxiangAn improved zero eigen value method for

based

[15]

resolution

[J]Proceedings of the CSEE,2003,23(4),1-4

[10] Kurdur PPower system stability and control[M]McGraw- Hill
NewYork1994
[11]

Jiang NingqiangSong WenzhongDai XianzhongA restriction on the

power

system

by

theoretical

requisitions

of

the

bcu

method[J]Proceedings of the CSEE200424(6)35-39

[22]
[J]200424(9)13-18

[J]200323(4)48-52

Wang ChengshanXu XiaofeiYu Yixin et alVisualization of power

Wu ZhengqiuChen HuihuaTang Waiwen et alUsing single machine

system static voltage stability region in cut-set space[J]Proceedings of

equal area criterion to analyze multi-machine systems stability

[J]Proceedings of the CSEE 200323(4)48-52
[12]

the CSEE200424(9)13-18
[23]
[J]200424(12)86-91

[J]200323(5)9-13

Pan XiongXu GuoyuOPF based ATC calculation with static voltage

Liu YongqiangYan ZhengNi Yixin et alAn auxiliary-variable- based

stability constraints[J]Proceedings of the CSEE200424(12)86-91

direct method for computing quadratic turning bifurcation points of

power flow equations[J]Proceedings of the CSEE200323(5)9-13
[13] [J]

2005-03-30

200323(5)24-28

1949-

Zeng YuanYu YixinA practical direct method for determining

1978-

dynamic security regions of

electric power systems[J]Proceedings of

the CSEE200323(5)24-28

1959-

1977-

[14]

PDF "pdfFactory Pro" www.fineprint.com.cn