Você está na página 1de 58

www.ijmer.

com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

Shell Matricies and Fermion Verticies-Predicational


Anteriority and Character Constitution Thereof
1

Dr. K. N. Prasanna Kumar, 2Prof. B. S. Kiranagi, 3Prof. C. S. Bagewadi

Abstract: In quantum physics, in order to quantize a gauge theory, like for example Yang-Mills theory, Chern-Simons or BF
model, one method is to perform a gauge fixing. This is done in the BRST and Batalin-Vilkovisky formulation. Another is to
factor out the symmetry by dispensing with vector potentials altogether (they're not physically observable anyway) and work
directly with Wilson loops, Wilson lines contracted with other charged fields at its endpoints and spin networks Presently
renormalization prescriptions of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) quark mixing matrix have been investigated by
many authors like Yong Zhou. Based on one prescription which is formulated by comparing with the fictitious case of no
mixing of quark generations, they have proposed the substantive limits, singular pauses, general rests, logical attributes and
real relations therefore a new prescription intermodal manifestation which can make the physical amplitude involving
quark's mixing gauge independent and ultraviolet finite. Compared with the previous prescriptions this prescription is very
simple and suitable for actual calculations. Through analytical calculations we also give a strong Proof for the important
hypothesis that in order to keep the CKM matrix gauge independent the unitarity of the CKM matrix must be preserved.
Mass-shell renormalization of fermion mixing matrices have also been delineated and investigated upon by K.-P.O
Diener, B.A Kniehl wherein they consider favorable extensions of the standard model (SM) where the lepton sector contains
Majorana neutrinos with vanishing left-handed mass terms, thus allowing for the see-saw mechanism to operate, and
propose physical on-mass-shell (OS) renormalization conditions for the lepton mixing matrices that comply with ultraviolet
finiteness, gauge-parameter independence, and (pseudo)unitarity This is an important result that motivated us to draw up
the consolidation of some of the most important variables in Fermion and graviton vertices.. A crucial feature is that the
texture zero in the neutrino mass matrix is preserved by renormalization, which is not automatically the case for possible
generalizations of existing renormalization prescriptions for the CabibboKobayashiMaskawa (CKM) quark mixing matrix
in the SM. Our renormalization prescription also applies to the special case of the SM and leads to a physical OS definition
of the renormalized CKM matrix. A consummate and link model is built for the variables like gravity, matter field, virtual
photons and other important variables. Nevertheless the stormy petrel Neutrino seems to rule the roost with its own
disnormative prescriptions for itself. Rich IN ITS twists and turns, the Model seems to offer a parade of variables bent on
aggrandizement agenda.

I.

Introduction:

WardTakahashi identity
In quantum field theory, a Ward-Takahashi identity is an identity between correlation functions that follows from
the global or gauged symmetries of the theory, and which remains valid after renormalization.
The Ward-Takahashi identity of quantum electrodynamics was originally used by John Clive Ward and Yasushi
Takahashi to relate the wave function renormalization of the electron to its vertex renormalization factor F1(0), guaranteeing
the cancellation of the ultraviolet divergence to all orders of perturbation theory. Later uses include the extension of the
proof of Goldstone's theorem to all orders of perturbation theory.
The Ward-Takahashi identity is a quantum version of the classical Noether's theorem, and any symmetry in a
quantum field theory can lead to an equation of motion for correlation functions..
The Ward-Takahashi identity applies to correlation functions in momentum space, which do not necessarily have all their
external momenta on-shell. Let

be a QED correlation function involving an external photon with momentum k (where


is the polarization vector of
the photon), n initial-state electrons with momenta
, and n final-state electrons with momenta
.
Also define
to be the simpler amplitude that is obtained by removing the photon with momentum k from original
amplitude. Then the Ward-Takahashi identity reads

where e is the charge of the electron. Note that if


has its external electrons on-shell, then the amplitudes on the righthand side of this identity each had one external particle off-shell, and therefore they do not contribute to S-matrix elements.
The Ward identity
The Ward identity is a specialization of the Ward-Takahashi identity to S-matrix elements, which describe physically
possible scattering processes and thus have all their external particles on-shell. Again let
www.ijmer.com

2110 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

be the amplitude for some QED process involving an external photon with momentum , where
vector of the photon. Then the Ward identity reads:

is the polarization

Physically, what this identity means is the longitudinal polarization of the photon which arises in the gauge is unphysical
and disappears from the S-matrix.

II.

Some Reviews:

Flavor Changing Fermion-Graviton Vertices (SEE FOR DETAILS G. Degrassi, E. Gabrielli, L. Trentadueemphasis mine)Authors study the flavor-changing quark-graviton vertex that is induced at the one-loop level when
gravitational interactions are coupled to the standard model. Because of the conservation of the energy-momentum tensor the
corresponding form factors turn out to be finite and gauge-invariant. Analytical expressions of the form factors are provided
at leading order in the external masses. Authors show that flavor-changing interactions in gravity are local if the graviton is
strictly massless while if the graviton has a small mass long-range interactions inducing a flavor-changing contribution in the
Newton potential appear. Flavor-changing processes with massive spin-2 particles are also briefly discussed in the paper. .
These results can be generalized to the case of the lepton-graviton coupling.
Examples of its use include constraining the tensor structure of the vacuum polarization and of the electron vertex
function in QED. Gauge dependence of the on-shell renormalized mixing matrices WAS STUDIED BY Youichi Yamada It
was recently pointed out that the on-shell renormalization of the CabibboKobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix in the method
by Denner and Sack causes a gauge parameter dependence of the amplitudes. Authors analyze the gauge dependence of the
on-shell renormalization of the mixing matrices both for fermions and scalars in general cases, at the one-loop level. It is also
shown that this gauge dependence can be avoided by xing the counterterm for the mixing matrices in terms of the odiagonal wave function corrections for fermions and scalars after a rearrangement, in a similar manner to the pinch technique
for gauge bosons. Particles in the same representation under unbroken symmetries can mix with each other. The neutral
gauge bosons, quarks, and massive neutrinos in the Standard Model (SM) are well-known examples. New particles in
extensions of the Standard Model also show the mixings. For example, in the minimal supersymmetric (SUSY) standard
model (MSSM), a very promising extension, super partners of most SM particles show the mixing .The mixing of particles is
expressed in terms of the mixing matrix, which represents the relations between the gauge eigenstates and the mass
eigenstates of the particles. The mixing matrices always appear at the couplings of these particles in the mass eigenbasis.
Because of the fact that mass eigenstates at the tree-level mix with each other by radiative corrections, (it calls for) the
mixing matrices have to be renormalized to obtain ultraviolet (UV) nite amplitudes. Denner and Sack have proposed a
simple scheme to renormalize the mixing matrix of Dirac fermions at the one-loop level, which is usually called the on-shell
renormalization scheme. They have required the counterterm for the renormalized mixing matrix to completely absorb the
anti-Hermitian part of the wave function correction Zijfor the external on-shell elds*

III.

GRAVITY AND MATTER FIELDS:

MODULE NUMBERED ONE NOTATION :


13 : CATEGORY ONE OF GRAVITY
14 : CATEGORY TWO OFGRAVITY
15 : CATEGORY THREE OF GRAVITY
13 : CATEGORY ONE OF MATTER FILEDS
14 : CATEGORY TWO OF MATTER FIELDS
15 :CATEGORY THREE OF MATTER FIELDS
GRAVITON FIELD AND CONSERVED MATTER ENERGY MOMENTUM TENSOR(LIKE IN A BANK THE RULE
THAT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ARE EQUIVALENT IS APPLIED TO THE IBNDIVIDUAL SYSTEMS, THE
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY MOMENTUM TENSOR IS APPLICABLE TO VARIOUS SYSTEMS AND THE
CLASSIFICATION IS BASED ON THE CHARACTERSITICS OF THE SYSTEMS TO WHICH THE CONSERVATION
PRINCIPLE IS APPLIED):
MODULE NUMBERED TWO:
=============================================================================
16 : CATEGORY ONE OF GRAVITON FIELD
17 : CATEGORY TWO OF GRAVITON FIELD
18 : CATEGORY THREE OF GRAVITON FIELD
16 : CATEGORY ONE OF CONSERVED MATTER-ENERGY-MOMENTUM TENSOR(WE ARE HERE SPEAKING
OF SYSTEMS TO WHICH IT IS APPLICABLE. PLEASEE THE BANK EXAMPLE GIVEN ABOVE)
17 : CATEGORY TWO OF CONSERVED MATTER-ENERGY-MOMENTUM TENSOR
18 : CATEGORY THREE OF CONSERVED MATTER-ENERGY-MOMENTUM TENSOR
VIRTUAL PHOTONS AND GRAVITON PHOTON VERTEX:
MODULE NUMBERED THREE:
=============================================================================
www.ijmer.com

2111 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
20 : CATEGORY ONE OF VIRTUAL PHOTONS(WE HERE SPEAK OF THE CHARACTERISED SYSTEMS FOR
WHICH QUANTUM GAUGE THEORY IS APPLICABLE)
21 :CATEGORY TWO OF VIRTUAL PHOTONS
22 : CATEGORY THREE OF VIRTUAL PHOTONS
20 : CATEGORY ONE OF GRAVITON ELECTRON VERTEX
21 :CATEGORY TWO OF GRAVITON ELECTRON VERTEX
22 : CATEGORY THREE OF GRAVITON ELECTRON VERTEX
QUANTUM FIELD THEORY(AGAIN,PARAMETRICIZED SYSTEMS TO WHICH QFT COULD BE APPLIED
IS TAKEN IN TO CONSIDERATION AND RENORMALIZATION THEORY(BASED ON CERTAIN
VARAIBLES OF THE SYSTEM WHICH CONSEQUENTIALLY CLSSIFIABLE ON PARAMETERS)
: MODULE NUMBERED FOUR:
============================================================================
24 : CATEGORY ONE OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORY(EVALUATIVE PARAMETRICIZATION OF SITUATIONAL
ORIENTATIONS AND ESSENTIAL COGNITIVE ORIENTATION AND CHOICE VARIABLES OF THE SYSTEM TO
WHICH QFT IS APPLICABLE)
25 : CATEGORY TWO OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORY
26 : CATEGORY THREE OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORY
24 :CATEGORY ONE OF RENORMALIZATION THEORY
25 :CATEGORY TWO OF RENORMALIZATION THEORY(SYSTEMIC INSTRUMENTAL CHARACTERISATIONS
AND ACTION ORIENTATIONS AND FUYNCTIONAL IMPERATIVES OF CHANGE MANIFESTED THEREIN )
26 : CATEGORY THREE OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORY
VIRTUAL ELECTRONS AND GRAVITON PHOTON VERTEX
MODULE NUMBERED FIVE:
=============================================================================
28 : CATEGORY ONE OF VIRTUAL ELECTRONS
29 : CATEGORY TWO OFVIRTUAL ELECTRONS
30 :CATEGORY THREE OF VIRTUAL ELECTRONS
28 :CATEGORY ONE OF GRAVITON PHOTON VERTEX
29 :CATEGORY TWO OF GRAVITON PHOTON VERTEX
30 :CATEGORY THREE OF GRAVITON PHOTON VERTEX
=========================================================================
QUANTUM CORRECTIONS TO ON SHELL MATRIX (VIRTUAKL GRAVITONS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN
THE LOOPS) AND WARD IDENTITIES FROM MATTER ENERGY MOMENTUM CONSERVATION(LOT OF
SYSTEMS CONSERVE THE MASS ENERGY AND THE CLASSIFICATION IS BASED ON THE
PARAMETRICIZATION OF THE SYSTEMS)
MODULE NUMBERED SIX:
=============================================================================
32 : CATEGORY ONE OF QUANTUM CORRECTION TO SHELL MATRIX
33 : CATEGORY TWO OF QUANTUM CORRECTIONS TO SHELL MATRIX
34 : CATEGORY THREE OFQUANTUM CORRECTIONS TO SHELL MATRIX
32 : CATEGORY ONE OF WARD IDENTITIES FROM MASS-ENERGY-MOMENTUM CONSERVATION(AGAIN
WE RECAPITUALTE THE BANK EXAMPLES THERE ARE MILLIONS OF SYSTEMS FOR WHICH THE
CONSERVATION HOLDS AND WE ARE CLASSIFYING THE SYSTEMS AND WARD IDENTITIES THEREOF)
33 : CATEGORY TWO OF WARD IDENTITIES
34 : CATEGORY THREE OF WARD IDENTITIES
CHARGED WEAK CURRENTS AND ONE LOOP FLAVOUR CHANGING NEUTRAL CURRENTS(FCNC) IN
THE FERMION PORTFOLIO:
MODULE NUMBERED SEVEN
==========================================================================
36 : CATEGORY ONE OF CHARGED WEAK CURRENTS
37 : CATEGORY TWO OF CHARGED WEAK CURRENTS
38 : CATEGORY THREE OF CHARGED WEAK CURRENTS (ENERGY EXCITATION OF THE VACUUM AND
CONCOMITANT GENERATION OF ENERGY DIFFERENTIAL-TIME LAG OR INSTANTANEOUSNESSMIGHT
EXISTS WHEREBY ACCENTUATION AND ATTRITIONS MODEL MAY ASSUME ZERO POSITIONS IS AN
EXAMPLE)
36 : CATEGORY ONE OF FCNC IN THE FERMIONS SECTOR
37 : CATEGORY TWO OF FCNC IN THE FERMIONS SECTOR
38 : CATEGORY THREE OF FCNC IN THE FERMIONS SECTOR
www.ijmer.com

2112 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
===============================================================================
13 1 , 14 1 , 15 1 ,
13 1 , 14 1 , 15 1
3
3
3
20
, 21
, 22
, 20 3 , 21 3 , 22 3
4
4
4
24
, 25
, 26
, 24 4 , 25 4 , 26 4 , 28
6
6
6
32
, 33
, 34
, 32 6 , 33 6 , 34 6
are Accentuation coefficients

1
1

1
1
13
, 14
, 15
,
13
, 14
, 15
,

3
, 20
, 21
, 22
, 20 , 21
, 22

4
4

4
4

24
, 25
, 26
, 24
, 25
, 26
, 28

6
32
, 33
, 34
, 32
, 33
, 34
are Dissipation coefficients

16
5

, 29

16
5

, 29

, 17

, 30
2

, 17

, 30

, 18

, 28
2

, 18

, 29
2

, 17

, 30

16

28

16

, 29

, 17

, 30

, 18

, 18

GRAVITY AND MATTER FIELDS:


MODULE NUMBERED ONE
The differential system of this model is now (Module Numbered one)*1
13

1
= 13 1 14 13
+ 13
14 , 13 *2

14

15

13

14

15

= 14

13 14

+ 14

14 , 14 *3

= 15

15

15

14 , 15 *4

= 13

14

13

13

, 13 *5

= 14

13 14

14

, 14 *6

= 15

14 15

15

, 15 *7

13

13

14

+
14 , = First augmentation factor *8
1

, = First detritions factor*


GRAVITON FIELD AND CONSERVED MATTER ENERGY MOMENTUM TENSOR(LIKE IN A BANK THE
RULE THAT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ARE EQUIVALENT IS APPLIED TO THE IBNDIVIDUAL SYSTEMS,
THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY MOMENTUM TENSOR IS APPLICABLE TO VARIOUS SYSTEMS AND
THE CLASSIFICATION IS BASED ON THE CHARACTERSITICS OF THE SYSTEMS TO WHICH THE
CONSERVATION PRINCIPLE IS APPLIED):
MODULE NUMBERED TWO:
:
The differential system of this model is now ( Module numbered two)*9
16

2
= 16 2 17 16
+ 16
17 , 16 *10

17

18

16

17

18

= 17

16 17

+ 17

17 , 17 *11

= 18

17 18

+ 18

17 , 18 *12

= 16

= 17

= 18

16

16

2
2

17

16

16

17

17 18

16

19 , 16 *13

17

19 , 17 *14

18

19 , 18 *15

17 , = First augmentation factor *16


19 , = First detritions factor *17

VIRTUAL PHOTONS AND GRAVITON PHOTON VERTEX:


MODULE NUMBERED THREE
The differential system of this model is now (Module numbered three)*18
20

3
= 20 3 21 20
+ 20
21 , 20 *19

21

22

20

21

22

= 21

20 21

+ 21

21 , 21 *20

= 22

21

22

22

21 , 22 *21

= 20

21 20

20

23 , 20 *22

= 21

20 21

21

23 , 21 *23

= 22

22

22

23 , 22 *24

21

www.ijmer.com

2113 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

3
+ 20
21 , = First augmentation factor*

3
20
23 , = First detritions factor *25
QUANTUM FIELD THEORY(AGAIN,PARAMETRICIZED SYSTEMS TO WHICH QFT COULD BE APPLIED
IS TAKEN IN TO CONSIDERATION AND RENORMALIZATION THEORY(BASED ON CERTAIN
VARAIBLES OF THE SYSTEM WHICH CONSEQUENTIALLY CLSSIFIABLE ON PARAMETERS)
: MODULE NUMBERED FOUR
The differential system of this model is now (Module numbered Four)*26
24

4
= 24 4 25 24
+ 24
25 , 24 *27

25

26

24

25

26

= 25

24 25

+ 25

25 , 25 *28

= 26

25 26

+ 26

25 , 26 *29

= 24

25 24

24

27 , 24 *30

= 25

24

25

25

27 , 25 *31

= 26

25

26

26

27 , 26 *32

24

24

+
25 , = First augmentation factor*33
4

27 , = First detritions factor *34


VIRTUAL ELECTRONS AND GRAVITON PHOTON VERTEX
MODULE NUMBERED FIVE
The differential system of this model is now (Module number five)*35
28

5
= 28 5 29 28
+ 28
29 , 28 *36

29

30

28

29

30

= 29

28 29

+ 29

29 , 29 *37

= 30

30

30

29 , 30 *38

= 28

29

28

28

31 , 28 *39

= 29

28 29

29

31 , 29 *40

= 30

30

30

31 , 30 *41

28

28

5
5

29

29

29 , = First augmentation factor *42


31 , = First detritions factor *43

QUANTUM CORRECTIONS TO ON SHELL MATRIX (VIRTUAKL GRAVITONS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN


THE LOOPS) AND WARD IDENTITIES FROM MATTER ENERGY MOMENTUM CONSERVATION(LOT OF
SYSTEMS CONSERVE THE MASS ENERGY AND THE CLASSIFICATION IS BASED ON THE
PARAMETRICIZATION OF THE SYSTEMS)
MODULE NUMBERED SIX:
The differential system of this model is now (Module numbered Six)*44
45
32

6
= 32 6 33 32
+ 32
33 , 32 *46

33

34

32

33

34

= 33

32 33

+ 33

33 , 33 *47

= 34

34

34

33 , 34 *48

= 32

33

32

32

35 , 32 *49

= 33

32 33

33

35 , 33 *50

= 34

33 34

34

35 , 34 *51

32

33

33 , = First augmentation factor*52

CHARGED WEAK CURRENTS AND ONE LOOP FLAVOUR CHANGING NEUTRAL CURRENTS(FCNC) IN
THE FERMION PORTFOLIO:
MODULE NUMBERED SEVEN
The differential system of this model is now (SEVENTH MODULE)*53
36

7
= 36 7 37 36
+ 36
37 , 36 *54

37

38

= 37

36 37

+ 37

37 , 37 *55

= 38

38

38

37 , 38 *56

37

www.ijmer.com

2114 | P a g e

36

37

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
7

7
37 36
36
39 , 36 *57

= 36
= 37

36 37

37

39 , 37 *58

= 38

37 38

38

39 , 38 *60

59
38

36

36

+
37 , = First augmentation factor *61
7

39 , = First detritions factor


FIRST MODULE CONCATENATION:

13
+ 13
14 , + 16
13

= 13

14

+ 24

4,4,4,4,

+ 28

25 ,

5,5,5,5,

+ 36

14
14

= 14

13

+ 25

14

4,4,4,4,

14 ,

17

+ 29

25 ,

15

= 15

14

+ 26

15

4,4,4,4,

14 ,

+ 30

25 ,

Where 13

16

+
3

+ 20

14 , , 14

17 , , +

2,2,

17 , , +

3,3,

21 , , + 21

3,3,

21 , , + 22

4,4,4,4,

25 ,

+ 28
and 3

+ 32
and 3

+ 36

5,5,5,5,

29 , , + 29

6,6,6,6,

33 , , + 33

, +

37 , + 37

= 13

14

4,4,4,4,

5,5,5,5,

6,6,6,6,

24

16

4,4,4,4,

14

= 14

13

14

25

4,4,4,4,

15

= 15

14

26

15

4,4,4,4,

28

Where

14

, ,

, ,

6,6,6,6,

14

33 ,

15

37 ,

25 , are fourth augmentation coefficient for category 1,

29 ,

6,6,6,6,

are fifth augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2

33 ,

are sixth augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2

20

3,3,

5,5,5,5,

31 ,

32

6,6,6,6,

21

3,3,

29

30

15

19 ,
31 ,

35 ,

13

33

23 ,

6,6,6,6,

35 ,

14

39 ,
2,2,

5,5,5,5,

23 ,

39 ,

2,2,

7,

18

7,

5,5,5,5,

38

13

33 ,
21 ,

39 ,

17

27 ,

3,3,

7,

37

15

+ 34

29 ,

4,4,4,4,

36

27 ,

+ 22

17 ,

5,5,5,5,

36

14

6,6,6,6,

37 , ARESEVENTHAUGMENTATION COEFFICIENTS

27 ,

21 ,

21 , are third augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3

33 , , + 34
7

+ 33

3,3,

17 , are second augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and

3,3,

29 , , + 30

13

are first augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

25 , , + 26

37 , + 38

13

2,2,

17

+ 24
2 and 3

13

14 ,

18

2,2,

25

33 ,

37 ,
2,2,

14 , , 15

21 ,

6,6,6,6,

+ 21

17 ,
29 ,

5,5,5,5,

+ 38

+ 32

3,3,

37 ,
2,2,

18

+ 20

17 ,
29 ,

5,5,5,5,

+ 37

15

2,2,

7,

19 ,
31 ,

22

34

3,3,
6,6,6,6,

23 ,
35 ,

15

39 ,

, are first detritions coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

16

2,2,

19 , , 17

2,2,

19 , , 18

2,2,

19 ,

20

3,3,

21

3,3,

22

3,3,

23 , are third detritions coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

24

4,4,4,4,

and 3

23 , ,

27 , ,

25

23 , ,
4,4,4,4,

27 , ,

26

4,4,4,4,

are second detritions coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3


27 , are fourth detritions coefficients for category 1, 2

www.ijmer.com

2115 | P a g e


28
and 3

32
and 3

36
*62
15

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
5,5,5,5,

5,5,5,5,

5,5,5,5,
31 , , 29
31 , , 30
31 , are fifth detritions coefficients for category 1, 2
6,6,6,6,

7,

35 ,

39 ,

= 15

36

14

Where 13

, 33
7,

15

6,6,6,6,

36

39 ,

15

26

4,4,4,4,

, , 14

, 34

35 ,

7,

18

30

, , 15

35 ,

are sixth detritions coefficients for category 1, 2

39 , ARE SEVENTH DETRITION COEFFICIENTS

27 ,

6,6,6,6,

2,2,

5,5,5,5,

22

19 ,

34

31 ,

3,3,

23 ,

6,6,6,6,

35 ,

15 *63

, are first detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

16

2,2,

19 , , 17

2,2,

19 , , 18

2,2,

19 ,

20

3,3,

21

3,3,

22

3,3,

23 , are third detritions coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

24
and 3

28
and 3

23 , ,

4,4,4,4,

27 , ,

5,5,5,5,

31 ,

25

23 , ,
4,4,4,4,

, 29

27 , , 26

5,5,5,5,

4,4,4,4,

, 30

31 ,

are second detritions coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3


27 , are fourth detritions coefficients for category 1, 2

5,5,5,5,

31 ,

are fifth detritions coefficients for category 1, 2

6,6,6,6,

6,6,6,6,

6,6,6,6,
32
35 , , 33
35 , , 34
35 , are sixth detritions coefficients for category 1, 2
and 3 *64
SECOND MODULE CONCATENATION:*65

1,1,

3,3,3
16
+ 16
17 , + 13
14 , + 20
21 ,
16

= 16

17

+ 24

4,4,4,4,4

+ 28

25 ,

17
17

= 17

16

+ 25

+ 17

4,4,4,4,4

5,5,5,5,5

36

+ 14

17 ,

+ 29

25 ,

7,7,

18

= 18

Where +

+ 13

+ 20
3

16

1,1,

17
2

+ 26

17 , , +

14 , , + 14

3,3,3

4,4,4,4,4

17

1,1,

21 , , + 21

18

17 ,

6,6,6,6,6

+ 21

3,3,3

5,5,5,5,5

29 ,

+ 33

6,6,6,6,6

7,7,

15

33 ,

16 66

37 ,
14 ,

+ 30

25 ,

21 ,
33 ,

17 *67

37 ,
1,1,

14 ,

+ 22

3,3,3

5,5,5,5,5

29 ,

+ 34

6,6,6,6,6

21 ,
33 ,

18 *68

+ 38

7,7,

18

17 , are first augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

17 , , +

14 , , +

3,3,3

+ 32

1,1,

+ 37

18

29 ,

15

1,1,

21 , , + 22

37 ,

14 ,

3,3,3

are second augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3

21 ,

are third augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and

4,4,4,4,4
+ 24
25 , , + 25
1, 2 and 3

4,4,4,4,4

25 , , + 26

5,5,5,5,5

+ 28
29 , , + 29
1, 2 and 3

5,5,5,5,5

29 ,

, + 30

5,5,5,5,5

29 ,

are fifth augmentation coefficient for category

6,6,6,6,6

+ 32
33 , , + 33
1, 2 and 3 *69

6,6,6,6,6

33 , , + 34

6,6,6,6,6

33 ,

are sixth augmentation coefficient for category

70

+ 36

7,7,

37 , + 37

7,7,

16
16

= 16

17

24

37 , + 38

16

4,4,4,4,4

7,7,

19 ,

27 ,

4,4,4,4,4

25 ,

are fourth augmentation coefficient for category

37 , ARE SEVENTH DETRITION COEFFICIENTS*71

13

28

1,1,

5,5,5,5,5

36

7,7

,
31 ,

20

32

3,3,3,

23 ,

6,6,6,6,6

35 ,

16 *72

39 ,

www.ijmer.com

2116 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com
17

= 17

16

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

17

17

25

4,4,4,4,4

14

19 ,

29

27 ,

5,5,5,5,5

37

18
18

= 18

17

where b16

13

1,1,

20

3,3,3,

26

4,4,4,4,4

, b17

G19 , t

, ,

18

14

1,1,

3,3,3,

24
and 3

28
and 3

4,4,4,4,4

27 , , 25

5,5,5,5,5

31 , , 29

32
and 3

6,6,6,6,6

35 , , 33

36

7,7

30

27 ,
2

G19 , t

15

39 , 36

20

= 20

21

+ 24

4,4,4,4,4,4

21

= 21

20 +

+ 21

25

4,4,4,4,4,4

+ 28

25 ,

22

= 22

21 + 26

+ 22

4,4,4,4,4,4

+ 30

25 ,

+ 16
and 3

+ 13
and 3

21 , , + 21

21 , , + 22

2,2,2

17 , , + 17

2,2,2

1,1,1,

14 , , + 14

1,1,1,

6,6,6,6,6

35 ,

18 *74

39 ,
are first detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

are third detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 3


27 ,

7,7

are fourth detritions coefficients for category 1,2

31 , are fifth detritions coefficients for category 1,2


35 ,

are sixth detritions coefficients for category 1,2

39 ,

1,1,1,

5,5,5,5,5,5

29 ,

+ 32

6,6,6,6,6,6

7.7.7.
2,2,2

7.7.7.

14 ,

17 ,

+ 14

29 ,

33

1,1,1,

33 ,

21 *77

37 ,
17 ,

+ 15

1,1,1,

5,5,5,5,5,5

29 ,

+ 34

6,6,6,6,6,6

21 ,

20 *76

14 ,

6,6,6,6,6,6

2,2,2

7.7.7.

33 ,

37 ,

5,5,5,5,5,5

+ 38

+ 20

34

31 ,

+ 13

+ 18

21 ,

17 *73

23 ,

17 ,

+ 37

22

35 ,

2,2,2

+ 17

29

3,3,3,

6,6,6,6,6

+ 16

21 ,

22

5,5,5,5,5

+ 36

21

6,6,6,6,6

4,4,4,4,4

39 , 36

25 ,

33

23 ,

35 , , 34

THIRD MODULE CONCATENATION:*75

3
20
+ 20
21 ,

31 ,

23 ,

are second detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 3

31 , , 30

7,7

3,3,3,

G19 , t

3,3,3,

27 , , 26

5,5,5,5,5

6,6,6,6,6

5,5,5,5,5

, b18

22

21

1,1,

7,7

1,1,

39 ,

38

23 , ,

4,4,4,4,4

7,7

15

19 ,

, ,

21

23 , ,

1,1,

14 ,
33 ,

22 *78

37 ,

are first augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

, + 18

2,2,2

17 ,

are second augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2

14 , , + 15

1,1,1,

14 ,

are third augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2

17 ,

4,4,4,4,4,4
4,4,4,4,4,4

4,4,4,4,4,4
+ 24
25 , , + 25
25 , , + 26
25 , are fourth augmentation coefficients for
category 1, 2 and 3

5,5,5,5,5,5

5,5,5,5,5,5

5,5,5,5,5,5
+ 28
29 , , + 29
29 , , + 30
29 ,
are fifth augmentation coefficients for
category 1, 2 and 3

6,6,6,6,6,6

+ 32
33 , , + 33
category 1, 2 and 3 *79

80

+ 36

7.7.7.

37 , + 37

7.7.7.

6,6,6,6,6,6

33 , , + 34

37 , + 38

7.7.7.

6,6,6,6,6,6

33 ,

are sixth augmentation coefficients for

37 , are seventh augmentation coefficient*81

www.ijmer.com

2117 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

20
20

= 20

21

24

20

4,4,4,4,4,4

36

23 ,

28

27 ,

5,5,5,5,5,5

36

21
21

= 21

20

25

21

4,4,4,4,4,4

7,7,7

17

23 ,

29

27 ,

22

= 22

21

26

22

4,4,4,4,4,4

23 ,

30

27 ,

7,7,7

20

16
3

13

24

23 , ,

21

23 ,

2,2,2

19 , , 17

1,1,1,

, , 14

2,2,2

1,1,1,

25

4,4,4,4,4,4

22

19 , , 18

, , 15

27 , ,
category 1, 2 and 3

5,5,5,5,5,5

28
31 , , 29
category 1, 2 and 3

4,4,4,4,4,4

6,6,6,6,6,6

32
35 , , 33
1, 2 and 3 *85

6,6,6,6,6,6

1,1,1,

13

1,1,1,

32

6,6,6,6,6,6

14

1,1,1,

33

6,6,6,6,6,6

35 ,

20 *82

31 ,

,
35 ,

21 *83

39 ,
19 ,
31 ,

15

1,1,1,

34

6,6,6,6,6,6

35 ,

22 *84

39 ,

are first detritions coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

2,2,2

27 , ,

5,5,5,5,5,5

7,7,7

23 ,

19 ,

2,2,2

5,5,5,5,5,5

38

31 ,

2,2,2

18

19 ,

39 ,

5,5,5,5,5,5

37

22

7,7,7

19 ,

26

are third detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 3


4,4,4,4,4,4

31 , , 30

35 , , 34

are second detritions coefficients for category 1, 2 and

27 ,

5,5,5,5,5,5

6,6,6,6,6,6

31 ,
35 ,

are fourth

detritions coefficients

for

are fifth

detritions coefficients

for

are sixth detritions coefficients for category

7,7,7

7,7,7

7,7,7
36
39 , 37
39 , 38
39 , are seventh detritions coefficients
====================================================================================

FOURTH MODULE CONCATENATION:*86

24
+ 24
25 , + 28
24

= 24

25

13

25
25

= 25

24

= 26

25

+ 25

14

26
26

1,1,1,1

1,1,1,1

+ 15

26

1,1,1,1

14 ,
4

2,2,2,2

17 ,

+ 36

7,7,7,7,

37 ,

28

5,5,

32

6,6,

25 , , 25

29 , , +

29

5,5,

33 , , +

33

6,6,

1,1,1,1

+ 13
14 , , + 14
2,and 3

5,5,

29 ,

17

2,2,2,2

17 ,

+ 37

7,7,7,7,

37 ,

30

5,5,

29 ,

+ 18

2,2,2,2

17 ,

38

7,7,7,7,

37 ,

24

+ 29

25 ,

14 ,

29 ,

16

25 ,

14 ,

5,5,

25 , , 26

25 ,

+ 32

6,6,

20

3,3,3,3

+ 33

6,6

21

3,3,3,3

+ 34

+ 22

6,6,
3,3,3,3

33 ,
21 ,

24 87

33 ,
21 ,

25 88

33 ,
21 ,

26 89

1, 2 3

29 , , +

30

5,5,

29 , 1, 2 3

33 , , +

34

6,6,

33 , 1, 2 3

1,1,1,1

14 , , + 15

1,1,1,1

14 ,

are fourth augmentation coefficients for category 1,

2,2,2,2

2,2,2,2

2,2,2,2
+ 16
17 , , + 17
17 , , + 18
17 , are fifth augmentation coefficients for category 1,
2,and 3

3,3,3,3

3,3,3,3

3,3,3,3
+ 20
21 , , + 21
21 , , + 22
21 , are sixth augmentation coefficients for category 1,
2,and 3

7,7,7,7,

7,7,7,7,

7,7,7,7,
+ 36
37 , + 36
37 , + 36
37 , ARE SEVENTH augmentation coefficients*90

www.ijmer.com

2118 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

91
*92

24
24

= 24

25

26

= 25

= 26

24

24

13

25
25

1,1,1,1

25

14

26

15

2,2,2,2

36

7,7,7,7,,,

29

37

7,7,7,77,,

30

27 ,

18

24

27 , ,

3,3,3,3

23 ,

24 93

21

6,6,

35 ,

3,3,3,3

23 ,

25 94

39 ,

5,5,

34

31 ,

19 ,

7,7,7,,7,,

35 ,

33

31 ,

19 ,

2,2,2,2

27 , , 26

20

6,6,

39 ,

5,5,

2,2,2,2

32

31 ,

19 ,

17

38

25

5,5,

16

27 ,

1,1,1,1

28

27 ,

1,1,1,1

26

25

22

6,6,

35 ,

3,3,3,3

23 ,

26 95

39 ,

27 , 1, 2 3

28

5,5,

31 , , 29

5,5,

31 , , 30

5,5,

31 ,

32

6,6,

33

6,6,

34

6,6,

35 , 1, 2 3

35 , ,

35 , ,

1, 2 3

, 15

1,1,1,1

1,1,1,1
13
, , 14
,
1, 2 3

2,2,2,2

2,2,2,2
16
19 , ,
17
19 , ,
1, 2 3

18

1,1,1,1

2,2,2,2

19 ,

3,3,3,3

3,3,3,3

3,3,3,3
20
23 , , 21
23 , , 22
23 ,
1, 2 3

7,7,7,7,7,,

7,7,7,7,7,,

7,7,7,7,7,,
36
39 , 37
39 , 38
39 , SEVENTH DETRITION
COEFFICIENTS*96
*97
FIFTH MODULE CONCATENATION:*98

4,4,

6,6,6
28
+ 28
29 , + 24
25 , + 32
33 ,
28

= 28

29

+ 13

29
29

= 29

28

= 30

29

+ 28

+ 24

32

6,6,6

4,4,

+ 14

30
30

1,1,1,1,1

30

25 , , + 25

+ 16

2,2,2,2,2

17 ,

+ 36

7,7,,7,,7,7

37 ,

25

+ 20

3,3,3,3,3

4,4,

25 ,

+ 33

6,6,6

+ 17

2,2,2,2,2

17 ,

+ 21

3,3,3,3,3

+ 37

7,7,,,7,,7,7

29 ,

+ 34

6,6,6

+ 18

2,2,2,2,2

17 ,

+ 22

3,3,3,3,3

+ 38

7,7,,7,,7,7

37 ,

29 , , + 30

25 , , + 26

33 , , +

34

21 ,

29 100

33 ,
21 ,

30 101

29 , 1, 2 3

4,4,

6,6,6

28 99

37 ,
25 ,

26

21 ,

33 ,

4,4,

29 ,

14 ,

4,4,

6,6,6

14 ,

1,1,1,1,1

29 , , + 29

33 , , +

29

1,1,1,1,1

+ 15

33

14 ,

25 ,

1, 2

33 , 1, 2 3

15

1,1,1,1,1

14 ,

are fourth augmentation coefficients for category

1,1,1,1,1

+ 13
14 , , + 14
1,2, and 3

1,1,1,1,1

14 , , +

2,2,2,2,2

+ 16
17 , , + 17
1,2,and 3

3,3,3,3,3

+ 20
21 , , + 21
1,2, 3
102
*103

2,2,2,2,2

17 , , + 18

2,2,2,2,2

17 ,

are fifth augmentation coefficients for category

3,3,3,3,3

21 , , + 22

3,3,3,3,3

21 ,

are sixth augmentation coefficients for category

www.ijmer.com

2119 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

28
28

= 28

29

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

13

28

1,1,1,1,1

24

31 ,

16

2,2,2,2,2

36

29
29

= 29

28

14

29

1,1,1,1,1

25

31 ,

17

30

= 30

29

15

30
1,1,1,1,1,

2,2,2,2,2

38

3,3,3,3,3

33

27 ,

6,6,6

21

19 ,

28 104

23 ,
35 ,

3,3,3,3,3

29 105

23 ,

38 ,

4,4,

2,2,2,2,2

35 ,

38 ,

7,7,7,7,7,

18

6,6,6

20

19 ,

4,4,

26

31 ,

32

23 ,

7,7,,7,7,7,

37

30

4,4,

34

27 ,

22

19 ,

7,7,7,7,7,

6,6,6

35 ,

3,3,3,3,3

23 ,

30 106

38 ,

5
28
31 , , 29
31 , , 30
31 ,

1, 2 3

4,4,
4,4,

4,4,
24
27 , , 25
27 , , 26
27 , 1,2 3

32

6,6,6

35 , , 33

6,6,6

13
3

1,1,1,1,1

, , 14

16
and 3

2,2,2,2,2

19 , , 17

35 , , 34

1,1,1,1,1

, 15

2,2,2,2,2

6,6,6

35 ,

1,1,1,1,1,

19 , , 18

1,2 3

2,2,2,2,2

are fourth detrition coefficients for category 1,2, and

19 ,

are fifth detrition coefficients for category 1,2,

3,3,3,3,3

3,3,3,3,3

3,3,3,3,3
20
23 , , 21
23 , , 22
23 , are sixth detrition coefficients for category 1,2,
and 3107
SIXTH MODULE CONCATENATION*108

5,5,5

4,4,4,
32
+ 32
33 , + 28
29 , + 24
25 ,
32

= 32

33 + 13

1,1,1,1,1,1

33
33

= 33

32 + 14

14 ,

33

1,1,1,1,1,1

+ 16

2,2,2,2,2,2

17 ,

+ 36

7,7,7,7,7,7,

37 ,

33 ,

+ 17

14 ,

+ 37

34
34

= 34

32

28

5,5,5

33 + 15

33 , , +

33

34

1,1,1,1,1,1

33 , , +

29 , , +

29

5,5,5

25 , , +

25

4,4,4,

34

+ 25

4,4,4,

2,2,2,2,2,2

17 ,

+ 21

3,3,3,3,3,3

7,7,7,,7,7,7,

37 ,

30

+ 26

4,4,4,

+ 18

2,2,2,2,2,2

17 ,

+ 22

3,3,3,3,3,3

+ 38

7,7,7,7,7,7,

37 ,

33 ,

30

33 110

21 ,

25 ,
34 111

21 ,

1, 2 3

5,5,5

4,4,4,

+ 13

1,1,1,1,1,1

14 , , + 14

1,1,1,1,1,1

14 , , + 15

1,1,1,1,1,1

14 ,

- are fourth augmentation coefficients

16

2,2,2,2,2,2

17 , , +

17

2,2,2,2,2,2

17 , , +

18

2,2,2,2,2,2

17 ,

- fifth augmentation coefficients

+ 20

3,3,3,3,3,3

21 , , + 21

3,3,3,3,3,3

21 , , + 22

21 ,

sixth augmentation coefficients

7,7,,77,7,,7,

37 ,

7,7,7,7,7,7,
+ 36
37 ,
COEFFICIENTS112
*113

+ 36

32
32

= 32

33 13

32

1,1,1,1,1,1

35 ,

4,4,4,

29 , 1, 2 3

+ 24

25 , , + 26

32 109

21 ,

25 ,

29 ,

29 , , +

29 ,

5,5,5

33 ,

14 ,

3,3,3,3,3,3

5,5,5

29

+ 20

+ 36

28

25 ,

1, 2 3

3,3,3,3,3,3
7,7,7,,7,7,7,

5,5,5

31 ,

16

2,2,2,2,2,2

19 ,

36

7,7,7,,7,7,7

39 ,

www.ijmer.com

37 , ARE

24

20

4,4,4,

SVENTH

AUGMENTATION

27 ,

3,3,3,3,3,3

23 ,

32 114

2120 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

www.ijmer.com

33
33

= 33

32
14

= 34

32

28

5,5,5

24

4,4,4,

33 15

35 , , 33

1,1,1,1,1,1

34
34

33

34

1,1,1,1,1,1

31 , ,

29

5,5,5

27 , ,

25

4,4,4,

5,5,5

17

2,2,2,2,2,2

37

7,7,7,,7,7,7

35 ,

30

2,2,2,2,2,2

38

7,7,7,,7,7,7

31 , ,
27 , ,

35 ,

30

21

19 ,

4,4,4,

27 ,

3,3,3,3,3,3

23 ,

33 115

39 ,

26

31 ,

22

19 ,

4,4,4,

27 ,

3,3,3,3,3,3

23 ,

34 116

39 ,

1, 2 3

5,5,5

26

25

31 ,

5,5,5

18

, 34

35 ,

29

35 ,

31 ,

4,4,4,

1, 2 3

27 ,

1,2 3

1,1,1,1,1,1

1,1,1,1,1,1
1,1,1,1,1,1
13
, , 14
, , 15
,
are fourth detrition coefficients for category 1, 2,
and 3

2,2,2,2,2,2

2,2,2,2,2,2

2,2,2,2,2,2
16
19 , , 17
19 , , 18
19 , are fifth detrition coefficients for category 1,
2, and 3

3,3,3,3,3,3

20
23 , , 21
2, and 3

3,3,3,3,3,3

23 , , 22

7,7,7,7,7,7

7,7,7,7,7,7

36
39 , 36
39 , 36
COEFFICIENTS117
*118
SEVENTH MODULE CONCATENATION:*119
36

= 36

28729,

36

37

+ 36

16

37 , +

3,3,3,3,3,3

7,7,7,7,7,7

23 ,

are sixth detrition coefficients for category 1,

39 , ARE

17 ,

20

SEVENTH

21 ,

DETRITION

24

23 , 36 +

+ 32733, +13714, 36*120

121
37

= 37

36 37

+ 37

37 ,

25725, +33733, + 29729,

14

14 ,

21

21 , +

17

15

14 ,

22

21 , +

+ 18

17 ,

37

*122
38

= 38

38

37

+ 38

37 ,

17 ,

231 ,

26725, + 34733, + 30729, 38


*123
124
125
36
=

36

37 36

24727,
*126
37
= 37

36

25

33

36

16

39 ,

28731,

13

19 ,

32735,

14 ,

20

36

36

37
7

17

39 ,

27 ,

29

19

19 ,

31 ,

14 ,

21

231 ,

35 ,

37

*127
Where we suppose
(A)

> 0,

www.ijmer.com

2121 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com
, = 13,14,15
(B)

(C)

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

The functions 1 , 1 are positive continuous increasing and bounded.


Definition of ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 :

(14 , ) ( ) 1 ( 13 )(1)

(, ) ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( 13 )(1)

2 1 14 , = ( ) 1
limG 1 , = ( ) 1
Definition of ( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) :
( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) , ( ) 1 , ( ) 1

Where

are

positive

constants

and = 13,14,15
They satisfy Lipschitz condition:
(1)

|( ) 1 14
, ( ) 1 14 , | ( 13 )(1) |14 14
| ( 13 )
|( )

, ( ) 1 , | < ( 13 )(1) || || ( 13 )

(1)

With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( ) 1 14


, and( ) 1 14 , . 14
, and
1
(1)
(1)
14 , are points belonging to the interval ( 13 ) , ( 13 )
. It is to be noted that ( ) 14 , is uniformly continuous. In
the eventuality of the fact, that if ( 13 )(1) = 1 then the function ( ) 1 14 , , the first augmentation coefficient attributable
to terrestrial organisms, would be absolutely continuous.

Definition of ( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) :


(D)

( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) , are positive constants


( ) 1
( 13 ) (1)

( ) 1

,(

(1)
13 )

<1

Definition of ( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) :


(E)

There exists two constants ( 13 )(1) and ( 13 )(1) which together with ( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) , (13 )(1) ( 13 )(1) and
the constants ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 , = 13,14,15,
satisfy the inequalities
1
( 13 )(1)

[ ( ) 1 + ( ) 1 + ( 13 )(1) + ( 13 )(1) ( 13 )(1) ] < 1

1
[ ( ) 1 + ( ) 1 + ( 13 )(1) + ( 13 )(1) ( 13 )(1) ] < 1
( 13 )(1)
38

= 38

22723,
38

37 38

38

39 ,

26727,

18

19 ,

20

30731,

7
+ 36
37 , = First augmentation factor
2
(1)
, 2 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 2 > 0, , = 16,17,18
(F)
(2) The functions 2 , 2 are positive continuous increasing and bounded.
Definition of (pi ) 2 , (ri ) 2 :
2

(G)

2 17 , ( ) 2 16
2 (19 , ) ( ) 2 ( ) 2 ( 16 )(2)
(3) lim2 2 17 , = ( ) 2
www.ijmer.com

14 ,

34735,

128
129
130
131
132
134
135
136
137
138
139
140

2122 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
lim 2 19 , = ( ) 2
Definition of ( 16 )(2) , ( 16 )(2) :
Where ( 16 )(2) , ( 16 )(2) , ( ) 2 , ( ) 2 are positive constants and = 16,17,18
They satisfy Lipschitz condition:
(2)

|( ) 2 17
, ( ) 2 17 , | ( 16 )(2) |17 17
| ( 16 )
(2)
|( ) 2 19 , ( ) 2 19 , | < ( 16 )(2) || 19 19 || ( 16 )

With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( ) 2 17


, and( ) 2 17 ,

(2)
(2)
. 17 , And 17 , are points belonging to the interval ( 16 ) , ( 16 )
. It is to be noted that ( ) 2 17 ,
is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( 16 )(2) = 1 then the function ( ) 2 17 , , the
SECOND augmentation coefficient would be absolutely continuous.
Definition of ( 16 )(2) , ( 16 )(2) :
(H)
(4) ( 16 )(2) , ( 16 )(2) , are positive constants
( ) 2
( 16 ) (2)

( ) 2

Definition of
)(2) :
There exists two constants ( 16 )(2) and ( 16 )(2) which together with ( 16 )(2) , ( 16 )(2) , (16 )(2) ( 16 )(2)
and the constants ( ) 2 , ( ) 2 , ( ) 2 , ( ) 2 , ( ) 2 , ( ) 2 , = 16,17,18,
satisfy the inequalities
1
2
+ (ai ) 2 + ( A16 )(2) + ( P16 )(2) ( k16 )(2) ] < 1
(2) [ (a i )
[
( 16 )(2)

Where we suppose
(I)
(5) 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 > 0, , = 20,21,22
The functions 3 , 3 are positive continuous increasing and bounded.
Definition of ( ) 3 , (ri ) 3 :
3 (21 , ) ( ) 3 ( 20 )(3)
3 (23 , ) ( ) 3 ( ) 3 ( 20 )(3)
2 3 21 , = ( ) 3
limG 3 23 , = ( ) 3
Definition of ( 20 )(3) , ( 20 )(3) :
Where ( 20 )(3) , ( 20 )(3) , ( ) 3 , ( ) 3 are positive constants and = 20,21,22
They satisfy Lipschitz condition:
(3)

|( ) 3 21
, ( ) 3 21 , | ( 20 )(3) |21 21
| ( 20 )
(3)
|( ) 3 23 , ( ) 3 23 , | < ( 20 )(3) ||23 23 || ( 20 )

With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( ) 3 21


, and( ) 3 21 ,

(3)
(3)
. 21 , And 21 , are points belonging to the interval
( 20 ) , ( 20 )
. It is to be noted that
( ) 3 21 , is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( 20 )(3) = 1 then the function
( ) 3 21 , , the THIRD augmentation coefficient, would be absolutely continuous.
Definition of ( 20 )(3) , ( 20 )(3) :
(J)
(6) ( 20 )(3) , ( 20 )(3) , are positive constants
( ) 3

,(

(3)
20 )

( 20 )(3)

(K)

149

150

152
153

154
155
156
157
158
159
160

161

162
163
164
165
166
167

[ ( ) 3 + ( ) 3 + ( 20 )(3) + ( 20 )(3) ( 20 )(3) ] < 1

Where we suppose
4 , 4 ,
(L)

147
148

<1

There exists two constants There exists two constants ( 20 )(3) and ( 20 )(3) which together with
( 20 )(3) , ( 20 )(3) , (20 )(3) ( 20 )(3) and the constants ( ) 3 , ( ) 3 , ( ) 3 , ( ) 3 , ( ) 3 , ( ) 3 , =
20,21,22,
satisfy the inequalities
1
3
+ ( ) 3 + ( 20 )(3) + ( 20 )(3) ( 20 )(3) ] < 1
(3) [ ( )
( 20 )
1

146

151

( ) 2 + ( ) 2 + ( 16 )(2) + ( 16 )(2) ( 16 )(2) ] < 1

( ) 3
( 20 ) (3)

143
144
145

<1

( 16 )(2)
( 13 )(2) , ( 13

( M 16 )
1

141
142

(7) The functions

4
4

,
,

,
4

> 0,

, = 24,25,26

168
169

are positive continuous increasing and bounded.

Definition of ( ) 4 , ( ) 4 :
4 (25 , ) ( ) 4 ( 24 )(4)
4 27 , ( ) 4 ( ) 4 ( 24 )(4)
170
www.ijmer.com

2123 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
(M)
(8) 2 4 25 , = ( ) 4
limG 4 27 , = ( ) 4
Definition of ( 24 )(4) , ( 24 )(4) :
Where ( 24 )(4) , ( 24 )(4) , ( ) 4 , ( ) 4 are positive constants and = 24,25,26
They satisfy Lipschitz condition:
(4)

|( ) 4 25
, ( ) 4 25 , | ( 24 )(4) |25 25
| ( 24 )
(4)
|( ) 4 27 , ( ) 4 27 , | < ( 24 )(4) || 27 27 || ( 24 )

With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( ) 4 25


, and( ) 4 25 ,

. 25 , And 25 , are points belonging to the interval


( 24 )(4) , ( 24 )(4) . It is to be noted that
4
( ) 25 , is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( 24 )(4) = 4 then the function
( ) 4 25 , , the FOURTH augmentation coefficient WOULD be absolutely continuous.
Definition of ( 24 )(4) , ( 24 )(4) :
(N)
( 24 )176175 (4) , ( 24 )(4) , are positive constants
(O)
( ) 4
( 24

)(4)

( ) 4

,(

(4)
24 )

1
( 24 )(4)

(Q)

172

173
174

<1

Definition of ( 24 )(4) , ( 24 )(4) :


(P)
(9)
There exists two constants ( 24 )(4) and
(4)
( 24 ) , ( 24 )(4) , (24 )(4) ( 24 )(4)
and
( ) 4 , ( ) 4 , ( ) 4 , ( ) 4 , ( ) 4 , ( ) 4 , = 24,25,26,
satisfy the inequalities
1
[
( ) 4 + ( ) 4 + ( 24 )(4) + ( 24 )(4) ( 24 )(4) ] < 1
( )(4)
24

171

175
(4)

( 24 )

which
the

together with
constants

[ ( ) 4 + ( ) 4 + ( 24 )(4) + ( 24 )(4) ( 24 )(4) ] < 1

Where we suppose
5 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 5 > 0, , = 28,29,30
(R)
(10) The functions 5 , 5 are positive continuous increasing and bounded.
Definition of ( ) 5 , ( ) 5 :
5 (29 , ) ( ) 5 ( 28 )(5)
5 31 , ( ) 5 ( ) 5 ( 28 )(5)

176
177

178
(11) 2 5 29 , = ( ) 5
limG 5 31 , = ( ) 5
Definition of ( 28 )(5) , ( 28 )(5) :
Where ( 28 )(5) , ( 28 )(5) , ( ) 5 , ( ) 5 are positive constants and = 28,29,30
They satisfy Lipschitz condition:
(5)

|( ) 5 29
, ( ) 5 29 , | ( 28 )(5) |29 29
| ( 28 )
(5)
|( ) 5 31 , ( ) 5 31 , | < ( 28 )(5) || 31 31 || ( 28 )

With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( ) 5 29


, and( ) 5 29 ,

(5)
(5)
. 29 , and 29 , are points belonging to the interval ( 28 ) , ( 28 )
. It is to be noted that ( ) 5 29 ,
(5)
is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( 28 ) = 5 then the function ( ) 5 29 , ,
theFIFTH augmentation coefficient attributable would be absolutely continuous.
Definition of ( 28 )(5) , ( 28 )(5) :
(T)
( 28 )(5) , ( 28 )(5) , are positive constants
(S)

( ) 5

( 28

) (5)

( ) 5

,(

(5)
28 )

( 28 )(5)

180

181

<1

Definition of ( 28 )(5) , ( 28 )(5) :


(U)
There
exists
two
constants
( 28 )(5)
and
( 28 )(5)
which
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
( 28 ) , ( 28 ) , (28 ) ( 28 )
and
the
( ) 5 , ( ) 5 , ( ) 5 , ( ) 5 , ( ) 5 , ( ) 5 , = 28,29,30,
satisfy the inequalities
( 28 )(5)
1

179

182
together

with
constants

[ ( ) 5 + ( ) 5 + ( 28 )(5) + ( 28 )(5) ( 28 )(5) ] < 1


[ ( ) 5 + ( ) 5 + ( 28 )(5) + ( 28 )(5) ( 28 )(5) ] < 1

Where we suppose
6 , 6 , 6 , 6 , 6 , 6 > 0, , = 32,33,34
(12) The functions 6 , 6 are positive continuous increasing and bounded.
www.ijmer.com

183
184

2124 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
Definition of ( ) 6 , ( ) 6 :
6 (33 , ) ( ) 6 ( 32 )(6)
6 ( 35 , ) ( ) 6 ( ) 6 ( 32 )(6)
185
(13) 2 6 33 , = ( ) 6
limG 6 35 , = ( ) 6
Definition of ( 32 )(6) , ( 32 )(6) :
Where ( 32 )(6) , ( 32 )(6) , ( ) 6 , ( ) 6 are positive constants and = 32,33,34
They satisfy Lipschitz condition:
(6)

|( ) 6 33
, ( ) 6 33 , | ( 32 )(6) |33 33
| ( 32 )
(6)
|( ) 6 35 , ( ) 6 35 , | < ( 32 )(6) || 35 35 || ( 32 )

With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( ) 6 33


, and( ) 6 33 ,

(6)
(6)
. 33 , and 33 , are points belonging to the interval ( 32 ) , ( 32 )
. It is to be noted that ( ) 6 33 ,
(6)
is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( 32 ) = 6 then the function ( ) 6 33 , , the
SIXTH augmentation coefficient would be absolutely continuous.
Definition of ( 32 )(6) , ( 32 )(6) :
( 32 )(6) , ( 32 )(6) , are positive constants
( ) 6
( 32 ) (6)

( ) 6

186

187

188

<1

( 32 )(6)
( 32 )(6) , ( 32

Definition of
)(6) :
There exists two constants ( 32 )(6) and ( 32 )(6) which together with ( 32 )(6) , ( 32 )(6) , (32 )(6) ( 32 )(6)
and the constants ( ) 6 , ( ) 6 , ( ) 6 , ( ) 6 , ( ) 6 , ( ) 6 , = 32,33,34,
satisfy the inequalities
1
[ ( ) 6 + ( ) 6 + ( 32 )(6) + ( 32 )(6) ( 32 )(6) ] < 1
( )(6)

189

32

( 32 )(6)

[ ( ) 6 + ( ) 6 + ( 32 )(6) + ( 32 )(6) ( 32 )(6) ] < 1

Where we suppose
(V)

(W)

190

7 , 7 ,
, = 36,37,38

191

> 0,

The functions 7 , 7 are positive continuous increasing and bounded.


Definition of ( ) 7 , ( ) 7 :

(37 , ) ( ) 7 ( 36 )(7)

(, ) ( ) 7 ( ) 7 ( 36 )(7)
192

(X)

lim2
limG 7

37 , = ( )
39 , = ( ) 7

Definition of ( 36 )(7) , ( 36 )(7) :


Where
( 36 )(7) , ( 36 )(7) , ( ) 7 , ( ) 7
and = 36,37,38

are

positive

constants

They satisfy Lipschitz condition:


(7)

|( ) 7 37
, ( ) 7 37 , | ( 36 )(7) |37 37
| ( 36 )
|( )

39 , ( ) 7

193

(7)

39 , 39 | < ( 36 )(7) || 39 39 || ( 36 )

With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( ) 7 37


,
7

(7)
(7)
and( ) 37 , . 37 , and 37 , are points belonging to the interval ( 36 ) , ( 36 )
. It is to be
noted that ( ) 7 37 , is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( 36 )(7) = 7 then the
function ( ) 7 37 , , the first augmentation coefficient attributable to terrestrial organisms, would be
absolutely continuous.

Definition of ( 36 )(7) , ( 36 )(7) :

194

195
www.ijmer.com

2125 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

( 36 )(7) , ( 36 )(7) , are positive constants

(Y)

( ) 7
( 36 ) (7)

( ) 7
( 36 )(7)

<1

Definition of ( 36 )(7) , ( 36 )(7) :

196

There
exists
two
constants
( 36 )(7)
and
( 36 )(7)
(7)
(7)
(7)
(7)
( 36 ) , ( 36 ) , (36 ) ( 36 )
and
( ) 7 , ( ) 7 , ( ) 7 , ( ) 7 , ( ) 7 , ( ) 7 , = 36,37,38,
satisfy the inequalities

(Z)

1
( 36 )(7)

[ ( )

which
the

together
with
constants

+ ( ) 7 + ( 36 )(7) + ( 36 )(7) ( 36 )(7) ] < 1

1
[ ( ) 7 + ( ) 7 + ( 36 )(7) + ( 36 )(7) ( 36 )(7) ] < 1
( 36 )(7)
197
Definition of 0 , 0 :

28

28

() ( 28 )(5) ( 28 )

5
(5)

,
,

0 = 0 > 0
0 = 0 > 0
198
199

Definition of 0 , 0 :

32

32

0 = 0 > 0

(6)

() ( 32 )(6) ( 32 ) ,
0 = 0 > 0
================================================================================
===
Definition of 0 , 0 :

36

36

() ( 36 )(7) ( 36

)(7)

,
,

0 = 0 > 0
0 = 0 > 0

Proof: Consider operator (1) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , : + +
which satisfy

200

0 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 13 )(1) , 0 ( 13 )(1) ,
(1)
0 0 ( 13 )(1) ( 13 )
(1)
0 0 ( 13 )(1) ( 13 )
By

13 = 13
+ 0 (13 ) 1 14 13 (13
) 1 + 13
) 1 14 13 , 13

201
202
203
204

14
15

0
= 14
+ 0 (14 ) 1 13 13

0
= 15
+ 0 (15 ) 1 14 13

0
= 13
+ 0 (13 ) 1 14 13

0
= 14
+ 0 (14 ) 1 13 13

0
= T15
+ 0 (15 ) 1 14 13

(14
) 1 + (14
) 1 14 13 , 13

(15
) 1 + (15
) 1 14 13 , 13

13 13

13

14 13

13

205

15 13

13

206

(13
) 1 (13
) 1 13 , 13

13 13

13

207

(14
) 1 (14
) 1 13 , 13

14 13

13

208

T15 t
(15
) 1 (15
) 1 13 , 13
Where 13 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0,

15 13

13

209

13
14

210
if the conditions IN THE FOREGOING above are fulfilled, there exists a solution satisfying the conditions
Definition of 0 , 0 :
www.ijmer.com

2126 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

36

36

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
,

0 = 0 > 0

)(7)

() ( 36 )(7) ( 36
,
0 = 0 > 0
Consider operator (7) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , : + + which satisfy
0 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 36 )(7) , 0 ( 36 )(7) ,
(7)

0 0 ( 36 )(7) ( 36 )

(7)

0 0 ( 36 )(7) ( 36 )
By

0
36 = 36
+

(36 ) 7 37 36

(36
) 7 + 36
) 7 37 36 , 36

36 36

36

0
37 = 37
+

7
(37 ) 36 36
0

(37
) 7 + (37
) 7 37 36 , 36

37 36

36

0
38 = 38
+

7
(
)

38
37 36
0

(38
) 7 + (38
) 7 37 36 , 36

38 36

36

0
36 = 36
+

(36 ) 7 37 36

(36
) 7 (36
) 7 36 , 36

36 36

36

0
37 = 37
+

(37 ) 7 36 36

(37
) 7 (37
) 7 36 , 36

37 36

36

0
T38 t = T38
+

7
(38 ) 37 36
0

Where

36

(38
) 7 (38
) 7 36 , 36

38 36

36

is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0,

Consider operator (2) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , : + + which
satisfy

211

0 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 16 )(2) , 0 ( 16 )(2) ,
(2)
0 0 ( 16 )(2) ( 16 )
(2)
0 0 ( 16 )(2) ( 16 )
By

16 = 16
+ 0 (16 ) 2 17 16 (16
) 2 + 16
) 2 17 16 , 16

212
213
214
215

0
17 = 17
+
0
18 = 18
+
0
16 = 16
+
0
17 = 17
+

16 16

16

(17 ) 2 16 16

(17
) 2 + (17
) 2 17 16 , 17

17 16

16

216

(18 ) 2 17 16

(18
) 2 + (18
) 2 17 16 , 16

18 16

16

217

(16 ) 2 17 16

(16
) 2 (16
) 2 16 , 16

16 16

16

218

(17 ) 2 16 16

(17
) 2 (17
) 2 16 , 16

17 16

16

219

www.ijmer.com

2127 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

18 = 18
+ 0 (18 ) 2 17 16 (18
) 2 (18
) 2 16 , 16 18 16 16
Where 16 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0,

220

221
Consider operator (3) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , : + + which
satisfy
0 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 20 )(3) , 0 ( 20 )(3) ,
(3)
0 0 ( 20 )(3) ( 20 )
(3)
0 0 ( 20 )(3) ( 20 )
By

20 = 20
+ 0 (20 ) 3 21 20 (20
) 3 + 20
) 3 21 20 , 20
21
22
20
21

=
+ 0 (21 ) 3 20 20

0
= 22
+ 0 (22 ) 3 21 20

0
= 20
+ 0 (20 ) 3 21 20

0
= 21
+ 0 (21 ) 3 20 20

0
= T22
+ 0 (22 ) 3 21 20
0
21

(21
)3

(21
)3

21 20 , 20

(22
) 3 + (22
) 3 21 20 , 20

222
223
224
225
20 20

20

21 20

20

226

22 20

20

227

(20
) 3 (20
) 3 20 , 20

20 20

20

228

(21
) 3 (21
) 3 20 , 20

21 20

20

229

T22 t
(22
) 3 (22
) 3 20 , 20 22 20 20
Where 20 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0,
Consider operator (4) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , : + + which
satisfy

230

0 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 24 )(4) , 0 ( 24 )(4) ,
(4)
0 0 ( 24 )(4) ( 24 )
(4)
0 0 ( 24 )(4) ( 24 )
By

24 = 24
+ 0 (24 ) 4 25 24 (24
) 4 + 24
) 4 25 24 , 24

232
233
234
235

25
26
24
25

0
= 25
+ 0 (25 ) 4 24 24

0
= 26
+ 0 (26 ) 4 25 24

0
= 24
+ 0 (24 ) 4 25 24

0
= 25
+ 0 (25 ) 4 24 24

0
= T26
+ 0 (26 ) 4 25 24

(25
) 4 + (25
) 4 25 24 , 24

(26
) 4 + (26
) 4 25 24 , 24

231

24 24

24

25 24

24

236

26 24

24

237

(24
) 4 (24
) 4 24 , 24

24 24

24

238

(25
) 4 (25
) 4 24 , 24

25 24

24

239

T26 t
(26
) 4 (26
) 4 24 , 24 26 24 24
Where 24 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0,
Consider operator (5) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , : + + which
satisfy

240

0 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 28 )(5) , 0 ( 28 )(5) ,
(5)
0 0 ( 28 )(5) ( 28 )
(5)
0 0 ( 28 )(5) ( 28 )
By

28 = 28
+ 0 (28 ) 5 29 28 (28
) 5 + 28
) 5 29 28 , 28

243
244
245
246

29
30

=
+ 0 (29 ) 5 28 28

0
= 30
+ 0 (30 ) 5 29 28

0
= 28
+ 0 (28 ) 5 29 28

0
= 29
+ 0 (29 ) 5 28 28

0
= T30
+ 0 (30 ) 5 29 28
0
29

241
242

28 28

28

29 28 , 28

29 28

28

247

(30
) 5 + (30
) 5 29 28 , 28

30 28

28

248

(29
)5

+ (29
)5

(28
) 5 (28
) 5 28 , 28

28 28

28

249

(29
) 5 (29
) 5 28 , 28

29 28

28

250

T30 t
(30
) 5 (30
) 5 28 , 28
Where 28 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0,

30 28

28

251

28
29

252
www.ijmer.com

2128 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
Consider operator (6) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , : + + which
satisfy
0 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 32 )(6) , 0 ( 32 )(6) ,
(6)
0 0 ( 32 )(6) ( 32 )
(6)
0 0 ( 32 )(6) ( 32 )
By

32 = 32
+ 0 (32 ) 6 33 32 (32
) 6 + 32
) 6 33 32 , 32 32 32 32
0
33 = 33
+
0
34 = 34
+
0
32 = 32
+
0
33 = 33
+

(33 ) 6 32 32
0

(34 ) 6 33 32
0

(32 ) 6 33 32
0

(33 ) 6 32 32
0

(34 ) 6 33 32
0

(33
) 6 + (33
) 6 33 32 , 32

(34
) 6 + (34
) 6 33 32 , 32

253
254
255
256

33 32

32

257

34 32

32

258

(32
) 6 (32
) 6 32 , 32

32 32

32

259

(33
) 6 (33
) 6 32 , 32

33 32

32

260
261

T34 t = T34
+
(34
) 6 (34
) 6 32 , 32 34 32 32
Where 32 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0,
: if the conditions IN THE FOREGOING are fulfilled, there exists a solution satisfying the conditions

262

Definition of 0 , 0 :

36

36

0 = 0 > 0

(7)

() ( 36 )(7) ( 36 ) ,
0 = 0 > 0
Proof:
Consider operator (7) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , : + + which
satisfy
0 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 36 )(7) , 0 ( 36 )(7) ,

263

(7)

264

(7)

265
266

0 0 ( 36 )(7) ( 36 )
0 0 ( 36 )(7) ( 36 )
By
0
36 = 36
+

(36 ) 7 37 36

(36
) 7 + 36
) 7 37 36 , 36

36 36

36
267

0
37 = 37
+

7
(37 ) 36 36
0
0
38 = 38
+

7
(
)

38
37 36
0

(37
) 7 + (37
) 7 37 36 , 36

37 36

36
268

(38
)7

(38
)7

37 36 , 36

38 36

36
269

(36 )

0
37 = 37
+

(37 ) 7 36 36

36 =

0
36

0
T38 t = T38
+

7
(38 ) 37 36
0

Where

36

37 36

(36
)7

(36
)7

36 , 36

36 36

36

(37
) 7 (37
) 7 36 , 36

37 36

36

270
271

(38
)7

(38
)7

36 , 36

38 36

36

is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0,

Analogous inequalities hold also for 21 , 22 , 20 , 21 , 22


(a) The operator (4) maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it is
obvious that
(4)

0
0
24 24
+ 0 (24 ) 4 25
+( 24 )(4) ( 24 ) 24
24 =
www.ijmer.com

272
273

2129 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

0
1 + (24 ) 4 25
+

( 24 ) 4 ( 24 )(4)
( 24 )(4)

( 24 )

(4)

From which it follows that


0
24 24
( 24 )

(4)

274

( 24 ) 4
( 24 )(4)

0
( 24 )(4) + 25

( 24 )(4)+ 0
25
0
25

+ ( 24 )(4)

0 is as defined in the statement of theorem 1


(b) The operator (5) maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it is
obvious that
(5)

0
0
28 28
+ 0 (28 ) 5 29
+( 28 )(5) ( 28 ) 28
28 =
0
1 + (28 ) 5 29
+

( 28 ) 5 ( 28 )(5)
( 28 )(5)

( 28 )

(5)

From which it follows that


0
28 28
( 28 )

(5)

276

( 28 ) 5
( 28 )(5)

0
( 28 )(5) + 29

( 28 )(5)+ 0
29
0
29

+ ( 28 )(5)

0 is as defined in the statement of theorem 1


(c) The operator (6) maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it is
obvious that
0
32 32
+

(32 ) 6

(6)

0
33
+( 32 )(6) ( 32 )

0
1 + (32 ) 6 33
+

( 32 ) 6 ( 32 )(6)
( 32 )(6)

( 32 )

(6)

1
278

)6

(6)

( 32 )(6)

0
( 32 )(6) + 33

32

(
)(6)+ 0
33
32 0
33

+ ( 32 )(6)

0 is as defined in the statement of theorem1


Analogous inequalities hold also for 25 , 26 , 24 , 25 , 26
(d) The operator (7) maps the space of functions satisfying 37,35,36 into itself .Indeed it is obvious that
0
36 36
+

277

32 =

32

From which it follows that


0
32 32
( 32 )

275

(36 ) 7

(7)

0
37
+( 36 )(7) ( 36 )

0
1 + (36 ) 7 37
+

( 36 ) 7 ( 36 )(7)
( 36 )(7)

( 36

36 =

36

)(7)

279

1
280

From which it follows that


0
36 36
( 36 )

(7)

( 36 ) 7

0
( 36 )(7) + 37

( 36 )(7)

( 36 )(7)+ 0
37
0
37

+ ( 36 )(7)

0 is as defined in the statement of theorem 7


It is now sufficient to take

( ) 1
( 13 )(1)

( ) 1
( 13 )(1)

281

< 1 and to choose

( P13 )(1) and ( Q13 )(1) large to have


( ) 1
(13 ) 1

( 13 ) 1 + ( 13 )(1) + 0

( ) 1
(13 ) 1

(1)

( 13 )

282
283

( 13 )(1)+ 0

( 13 )(1)+ 0

( 13 )(1)
284
(1)

+ ( 13 )

(1)

( 13 )

In order that the operator (1) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , satisfying GLOBAL
EQUATIONS into itself
The operator (1) is a contraction with respect to the metric
1 , 1 , 2 , 2
=
{ 1 2 (13 )

, 1 2 (13 )
+

Indeed if we denote
Definition of , :

285
286

}
287

, = (1) (, )
www.ijmer.com

2130 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

It results
1
1

1
2
(13 ) 1 14 14 ( 13 ) 13 ( 13 ) 13 13 +
0
1
1

1
2

{(13
) 1 13 13 ( 13 ) 13 ( 13 ) 13 +
0
1
1

(13
) 1 141 , 13 131 132 ( 13 ) 13 ( 13 ) 13 +
1
1

132 |(13
) 1 141 , 13 (13
) 1 142 , 13 | ( 13 ) 13 ( 13 ) 13

13

} 13

Where 13 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0, t


From the hypotheses it follows
1
1 2 ( 13 )
1
( 13 ) 1

(13 ) 1 + (13
)

+ ( 13 ) 1 + ( 13 ) 1 ( 13 ) 1

288
1

And analogous inequalities for . Taking into account the hypothesis the result follows

Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (13


) 1 and (13
) 1 depending also on t can be considered as not
conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition
1
1
necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( 13 ) 1 ( 13 ) ( 13 ) 1 ( 13 )
respectively of + .
If instead of proving the existence of the solution on + , we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to
consider that ( ) 1 and ( ) 1 , = 13,14,15 depend only on T14 and respectively on ( ) and
hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition.
Remark 2: There does not exist any where = 0 = 0
From 19 to 24 it results

292

14 ( 13 ) 1 2 = 14
+ 2(14 ) 1 ( 13 ) 1 1 /(14
)1
In the same way , one can obtain
0

15 ( 13 ) 1 3 = 15
+ 2(15 ) 1 ( 13 ) 1 2 /(15
)1
If 14 15 is bounded, the same property follows for 13 , 15 and 13 , 14 respectively.
Remark 4: If 13 bounded, from below, the same property holds for 14 15 . The proof is analogous
with the preceding one. An analogous property is true if 14 is bounded from below.

Remark 5: If T13 is bounded from below and lim (( ) 1 ( , )) = (14


) 1 then 14 .
1
Definition of
and 1 :
Indeed let 1 be so that for > 1
(14 ) 1 ( ) 1 ( , ) < 1 , 13 () > 1

Then 14 (14 ) 1 1 1 14 which leads to

14

( 14 ) 1 1
1

( 14 ) 1
2

0 1
1 1 + 14

If we take t such that 1 =

, =

2
1

1
2

290
291

0 0 ( ) ( ) 14 13 , 13 13 0
1
0 ( ) > 0 for t > 0
Definition of ( 13 ) 1 1 , ( 13 ) 1 3 :
Remark 3: if 13 is bounded, the same property have also 14 15 . indeed if

13 < ( 13 ) 1 it follows 14 ( 13 ) 1 1 (14


) 1 14 and by integrating

14

289

293
294

295

it results

By taking now 1 sufficiently small one sees that T14 is unbounded. The

same property holds for 15 if lim (15


) 1 , = (15
)1
We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions
( ) 2

It is now sufficient to take (

(2)
16 )

( ) 2

,(

( 16 )(2) ( 16 )(2) large to have


( ) 2
(16 ) 2

( 16 )

(2)
16 )

(2)

+ 0

( 16 )(2)+ 0

+ ( 16 )

< 1 and to choose

( 16 )(2)+ 0

296
297
298

(2)

( 16 )

299
( ) 2
(16 ) 2

( 16 )(2) + 0

+ ( 16 )(2) ( 16 )(2)

In order that the operator (2) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , satisfying
The operator (2) is a contraction with respect to the metric

19 1 , 19 1 , 19 2 , 19 2
=
www.ijmer.com

300
301

2131 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
2
2
1
2
1
2
{ (16 ) , (16 ) }
+

Indeed if we denote
Definition of 19 , 19 :
It results

302
= (2) (19 , 19 )

19 , 19

303

2
2

161 2 0 (16 ) 2 171 172 ( 16 ) 16 ( 16 ) 16 16 +


2
2

{(16
) 2 161 162 ( 16 ) 16 ( 16 ) 16 +
0
2
2
1
1
2

(16
) 2 17 , 16 16 16 ( 16 ) 16 ( 16 ) 16 +
2
2

162 |(16
) 2 171 , 16 (16
) 2 172 , 16 | ( 16 ) 16 ( 16 ) 16

} 16

Where 16 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0,


From the hypotheses it follows
2
19 1 19 2 e( M 16 ) t
1
( M 16 ) 2

(16 )

(16
)2

+ ( A16 )

+ ( P16 )

( 16 )

19

304
305
1

, 19

; 19

, 19

And analogous inequalities for G and T . Taking into account the hypothesis the result follows

Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (16


) 2 and (16
) 2 depending also on t can be considered as not
conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition
2
2
necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( P16 ) 2 e( M 16 ) t and ( Q16 ) 2 e( M 16 ) t
respectively of + .
If instead of proving the existence of the solution on + , we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to
consider that ( ) 2 and ( ) 2 , = 16,17,18 depend only on T17 and respectively on 19 (and not on t)
and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition.
Remark 2: There does not exist any t where G t = 0 and T t = 0
From 19 to 24 it results
t

309

G17 ( M16 ) 2 2 = G17


+ 2(17 ) 2 ( M16 ) 2 1 /(17
)2
In the same way , one can obtain
0

G18 ( M16 ) 2 3 = G18


+ 2(18 ) 2 ( M16 ) 2 2 /(18
)2
If G17 or G18 is bounded, the same property follows for G16 , G18 and G16 , G17 respectively.
Remark 4: If G16 is bounded, from below, the same property holds for G17 and G18 . The proof is analogous
with the preceding one. An analogous property is true if G17 is bounded from below.

Remark 5: If T16 is bounded from below and limt (( ) 2 ( 19 t , t)) = (17


) 2 then T17 .
2
Definition of
and 2 :
Indeed let t 2 be so that for t > t 2
(17 ) 2 ( ) 2 ( 19 t , t) < 2 , T16 (t) > 2
dT
Then 17 (17 ) 2 2 2 T17 which leads to

T17
T17

( 17 ) 2

308

G t G0 e 0 ( ) ( ) T 17 16 , 16 d 16 0
2
T t T0 e ( ) t > 0 for t > 0
Definition of ( M16 ) 2 1 , ( M16 ) 2 2 and ( M16 ) 2 3 :
Remark 3: if G16 is bounded, the same property have also G17 and G18 . indeed if
dG

G16 < ( M16 ) 2 it follows dt17 ( M16 ) 2 1 (17


) 2 G17 and by integrating

dt
( 17 ) 2 2

306
307

0 2 t
1 e 2 t + T17
e
If we take t such that e 2 t =

, = log

2
2

1
2

310
311
312

313

it results

By taking now 2 sufficiently small one sees that T17 is unbounded. The

314

same property holds for T18 if lim (18


) 2 19 t , t = (18
)2
We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions

It is now sufficient to take

( ) 3
( 20 )(3)

( ) 3
( 20 )(3)

( P20 )(3) and ( Q20 )(3) large to have


( ) 3
(20 ) 3

( ) 3
(20 ) 3

( 20 )

+ ( 20 )

(3)

( 20 )

(3)

+ 0

( 20 )(3)+ 0

315
316

< 1 and to choose

( 20 )(3)+ 0

317
( 20 )

(3)

318
(3)

+ ( 20 )

(3)

( 20 )

In order that the operator (3) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , into itself
www.ijmer.com

319
2132 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
The operator (3) is a contraction with respect to the metric

23 1 , 23 1 , 23 2 , 23 2
=
{ 1 2 (20 )

Indeed if we denote
Definition of 23 , 23 :

, 1 2 (20 )
+

321
= (3) 23 , 23

23 , 23

It results

322

3
3

1
2
1
2
20 0 (20 ) 3 21 21 ( 20 ) 20 ( 20 ) 20 20 +
3
3

{(20
) 3 201 202 ( 20 ) 20 ( 20 ) 20 +
0
3
3

(20
) 3 211 , 20 201 202 ( 20 ) 20 ( 20 ) 20 +
3
3

202 |(20
) 3 211 , 20 (20
) 3 212 , 20 | ( 20 ) 20 ( 20 ) 20 } 20

323

Where 20 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0, t


From the hypotheses it follows
3
1 2 ( 20 )
1
( 20 ) 3

(20 ) 3 + (20
) 3 + ( 20 ) 3 + ( 20 ) 3 ( 20 ) 3

23

324
1

, 23

; 23

, 23

And analogous inequalities for . Taking into account the hypothesis the result follows

Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (20


) 3 and (20
) 3 depending also on t can be considered as not
conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition
3
3
necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( 20 ) 3 ( 20 ) ( 20 ) 3 ( 20 )
respectively of + .
If instead of proving the existence of the solution on + , we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to
consider that ( ) 3 and ( ) 3 , = 20,21,22 depend only on T21 and respectively on 23 ( )
and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition.
Remark 2: There does not exist any where = 0 = 0
From 19 to 24 it results

21
21

(21 )

( 21 ) 3 3
3

( 21 ) 3
2

326

327

21 ( 20 ) 3 2 = 21
+ 2(21 ) 3 ( 20 ) 3 1 /(21
)3
In the same way , one can obtain
0

22 ( 20 ) 3 3 = 22
+ 2(22 ) 3 ( 20 ) 3 2 /(22
)3
If 21 22 is bounded, the same property follows for 20 , 22 and 20 , 21 respectively.
Remark 4: If 20 bounded, from below, the same property holds for 21 22 . The proof is analogous
with the preceding one. An analogous property is true if 21 is bounded from below.

Remark 5: If T20 is bounded from below and lim (( ) 3 23 , ) = (21


) 3 then 21 .
3
Definition of
and 3 :
Indeed let 3 be so that for > 3
(21 ) 3 ( ) 3 23 , < 3 , 20 () > 3
21

325

0 0 ( ) ( ) 21 20 , 20 20 0
3
0 ( ) > 0 for t > 0
Definition of ( 20 ) 3 1 , ( 20 ) 3 2 ( 20 ) 3 3 :
Remark 3: if 20 is bounded, the same property have also 21 22 . indeed if

20 < ( 20 ) 3 it follows 21 ( 20 ) 3 1 (21


) 3 21 and by integrating

Then

320

, =

329
330
331

3 21 which leads to

0 3
1 3 + 21

If we take t such that 3 =

328

1
2

it results

By taking now 3 sufficiently small one sees that T21 is unbounded. The

same property holds for 22 if lim (22


) 3 23 , = (22
)3
We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions

332
It is now sufficient to take

( ) 4
( 24 )(4)

( ) 4
( 24 )(4)

< 1 and to choose

333

( P24 )(4) and ( Q24 )(4) large to have

www.ijmer.com

2133 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com
( ) 4
(24 ) 4

( 24 )

( ) 4
(24 ) 4

+ ( 24 )

(4)

( 24 )

(4)

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
( 24 )(4)+ 0

+ 0

( 24 )(4)+ 0

334
( 24 )

(4)

335
(4)

+ ( 24 )

(4)

( 24 )

In order that the operator (4) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , satisfying IN to itself

336

The operator (4) is a contraction with respect to the metric

27 1 , 27 1 , 27 2 , 27 2
=

337

{ 1 2 (24 )

, 1 2 (24 )
+

Indeed if we denote
Definition of 27 , 27 :
27 , 27 = (4) ( 27 , 27 )
It results
4
4

241 2 0 (24 ) 4 251 252 ( 24 ) 24 ( 24 ) 24 24 +


4
4

{(24
) 4 241 242 ( 24 ) 24 ( 24 ) 24 +
0
4
4

(24
) 4 251 , 24 241 242 ( 24 ) 24 ( 24 ) 24
2
1
2

24 |(24
) 4 25 , 24 (24
) 4 25 , 24 |

( 24 )
Where 24 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0, t
From the hypotheses it follows
4
27 1 27 2 ( 24 )
1
( 24 ) 4

(24 ) 4 + (24
) 4 + ( 24 ) 4 + ( 24 ) 4 ( 24 ) 4

27

4
24

( 24 )

4
24

} 24
338
339

, 27

; 27

, 27

And analogous inequalities for . Taking into account the hypothesis the result follows

Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (24


) 4 and (24
) 4 depending also on t can be considered as not
conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition
4
4
necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( 24 ) 4 ( 24 ) ( 24 ) 4 ( 24 )
respectively of + .
If instead of proving the existence of the solution on + , we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to
consider that ( ) 4 and ( ) 4 , = 24,25,26 depend only on T25 and respectively on 27 ( )
and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition.
Remark 2: There does not exist any where = 0 = 0
From GLOBAL EQUATIONS it results

342

25 ( 24 ) 4 2 = 25
+ 2(25 ) 4 ( 24 ) 4 1 /(25
)4
In the same way , one can obtain
0

26 ( 24 ) 4 3 = 26
+ 2(26 ) 4 ( 24 ) 4 2 /(26
)4
If 25 26 is bounded, the same property follows for 24 , 26 and 24 , 25 respectively.
Remark 4: If 24 bounded, from below, the same property holds for 25 26 . The proof is analogous
with the preceding one. An analogous property is true if 25 is bounded from below.

Remark 5: If T24 is bounded from below and lim (( ) 4 ( 27 , )) = (25


) 4 then 25 .
Definition of 4 and 4 :
Indeed let 4 be so that for > 4
(25 ) 4 ( ) 4 ( 27 , ) < 4 , 24 () > 4

Then 25 (25 ) 4 4 4 25 which leads to

25

( 25 ) 4 4
4

( 25 ) 4
2

341

0 0 ( ) ( ) 25 24 , 24 24 0
4
0 ( ) > 0 for t > 0
Definition of ( 24 ) 4 1 , ( 24 ) 4 2 ( 24 ) 4 3 :
Remark 3: if 24 is bounded, the same property have also 25 26 . indeed if

24 < ( 24 ) 4 it follows 25 ( 24 ) 4 1 (25


) 4 25 and by integrating

25

340

0 4
1 4 + 25

If we take t such that 4 =

, =

2
4

1
2

343
344

345

it results

By taking now 4 sufficiently small one sees that T25 is unbounded. The

same property holds for 26 if lim (26


) 4 27 , = (26
)4
We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions ANALOGOUS inequalities

www.ijmer.com

2134 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
hold also for 29 , 30 , 28 , 29 , 30
346
It is now sufficient to take

( ) 5
( 28 )(5)

( P28 )(5) and ( Q28 )(5) large to have


( ) 5
(28 ) 5

( 28 ) 5 + ( 28 )(5) + 0

( ) 5

( 28 )(5) +

(28 ) 5

347

< 1 and to choose

( 28 )(5)+ 0

( 28 )(5)+ 0

( ) 5
( 28 )(5)

348
( 28 )(5)
349

+ ( 28 )(5) ( 28 )(5)

In order that the operator (5) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , into itself

350

(5)

The operator is a contraction with respect to the metric

31 1 , 31 1 , 31 2 , 31 2
=
{ 1 2 (28 )
+

351

, 1 2 (28 )

Indeed if we denote
Definition of 31 , 31 :
31 , 31 = (5) 31 , 31
It results
5
5

281 2 0 (28 ) 5 291 292 ( 28 ) 28 ( 28 ) 28


5
5

{(28
) 5 281 282 ( 28 ) 28 ( 28 ) 28 +
0
5
5
1
1
2

(28
) 5 29 , 28 28 28 ( 28 ) 28 ( 28 ) 28 +
5

282 |(28
) 5 291 , 28 (28
) 5 292 , 28 | ( 28 ) 28

28

( 28 ) 5

(28 ) 5 + (28
) 5 + ( 28 ) 5 + ( 28 ) 5 ( 28 ) 5

31

352

5
28

( 28 )
Where 28 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0, t
From the hypotheses it follows
5
31 1 31 2 ( 28 )
1

} 28

353
1

, 31

; 31

, 31

And analogous inequalities for . Taking into account the hypothesis (35,35,36) the result follows

Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (28


) 5 and (28
) 5 depending also on t can be considered as not
conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition
5
5
necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( 28 ) 5 ( 28 ) ( 28 ) 5 ( 28 )
respectively of + .
If instead of proving the existence of the solution on + , we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to
consider that ( ) 5 and ( ) 5 , = 28,29,30 depend only on T29 and respectively on 31 ( )
and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition.
Remark 2: There does not exist any where = 0 = 0
From GLOBAL EQUATIONS it results

354

355

0 0 ( ) ( ) 29 28 , 28 28 0
5
0 ( ) > 0 for t > 0
Definition of ( 28 ) 5 1 , ( 28 ) 5 2 ( 28 ) 5 3 :
Remark 3: if 28 is bounded, the same property have also 29 30 . indeed if

28 < ( 28 ) 5 it follows 29 ( 28 ) 5 1 (29


) 5 29 and by integrating

356

29 ( 28 ) 5 2 = 29
+ 2(29 ) 5 ( 28 ) 5 1 /(29
)5
In the same way , one can obtain
0

30 ( 28 ) 5 3 = 30
+ 2(30 ) 5 ( 28 ) 5 2 /(30
)5
If 29 30 is bounded, the same property follows for 28 , 30 and 28 , 29 respectively.
Remark 4: If 28 bounded, from below, the same property holds for 29 30 . The proof is analogous
with the preceding one. An analogous property is true if 29 is bounded from below.

Remark 5: If T28 is bounded from below and lim (( ) 5 ( 31 , )) = (29


) 5 then 29 .
5
Definition of
and 5 :
Indeed let 5 be so that for > 5

(29 ) 5 ( ) 5 ( 31 , ) < 5 , 28 () >


www.ijmer.com

357
358

2135 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
359

29

Then
29
29

(29 )

( 29 ) 5 5
5

( 29 ) 5 5
2

360

5 29 which leads to
1

0 5
1 5 + 29

If we take t such that 5 =


2

, =

it results

By taking now 5 sufficiently small one sees that T29 is unbounded. The

same property holds for 30 if lim (30


) 5 31 , = (30
)5
We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions
Analogous inequalities hold also for 33 , 34 , 32 , 33 , 34

361
It is now sufficient to take

( ) 6
( 32 )(6)

( ) 6
( 32 )(6)

( P32 )(6) and ( Q32 )(6) large to have


( ) 6
(32 ) 6

( 32 ) 6 + ( 32 )(6) + 0

( ) 6

( 32 )(6) +

(32 ) 6

( 32 )(6)+ 0

( 32 )(6)+ 0

362

< 1 and to choose

363
( 32 )(6)
364

+ ( 32 )(6) ( 32 )(6)

In order that the operator (6) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , into itself
(6)

The operator is a contraction with respect to the metric

35 1 , 35 1 , 35 2 , 35 2
=
{ 1 2 (32 )

365
366

, 1 2 (32 )

Indeed if we denote
Definition of 35 , 35 :
35 , 35 = (6) 35 , 35
It results
6
6

321 2 0 (32 ) 6 331 332 ( 32 ) 32 ( 32 ) 32

32

6
6

{(32
) 6 321 322 ( 32 ) 32 ( 32 ) 32 +
0
6
6
1
1
2

(32
) 6 33 , 32 32 32 ( 32 ) 32 ( 32 ) 32 +
6

322 |(32
) 6 331 , 32 (32
) 6 332 , 32 | ( 32 ) 32

6
32

( 32 )
Where 32 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0, t
From the hypotheses it follows
(1) 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 > 0,
, = 13,14,15

} 32

367

(2)The functions 1 , 1 are positive continuous increasing and bounded.


Definition of ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 :

(14 , ) ( ) 1 ( 13 )(1)

(, ) ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( 13 )(1)

(3) 2 1 14 , = ( ) 1
limG 1 , = ( ) 1
Definition of ( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) :
Where ( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) , ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 are positive constants
and = 13,14,15
They satisfy Lipschitz condition:
(1)

|( ) 1 14
, ( ) 1 14 , | ( 13 )(1) |14 14
| ( 13 )
|( )

, ( ) 1 , | < ( 13 )(1) || || ( 13 )
www.ijmer.com

(1)

2136 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( ) 1 14


, and( ) 1 14 ,

(1)
(1)
. 14 , and 14 , are points belonging to the interval ( 13 ) , ( 13 )
. It is to be noted that ( ) 1 14 , is
(1)
uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( 13 ) = 1 then the function ( ) 1 14 , , the first
augmentation coefficient attributable to terrestrial organisms, would be absolutely continuous.

Definition of ( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) :


( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) , are positive constants

(AA)

( ) 1
( 13

( ) 1

) (1)

,(

(1)
13 )

<1

Definition of ( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) :


There
exists
two
constants
( 13 )(1)
and
( 13 )(1)
which
together
with
( 13 )(1) , ( 13 )(1) , (13 )(1) ( 13 )(1) and the constants ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 , ( ) 1 , =
13,14,15,
satisfy the inequalities

(BB)

1
( 13 )(1)
1
( 13 )(1)

[ ( ) 1 + ( )

+ ( 13 )(1) + ( 13 )(1) ( 13 )(1) ] < 1

[ ( ) 1 + ( ) 1 + ( 13 )(1) + ( 13 )(1) ( 13 )(1) ] < 1

Analogous inequalities hold also for 37 , 38 , 36 , 37 , 38


( ) 7

It is now sufficient to take (

36

( ) 7

,(

)(7)

( ) 7
(36 ) 7

( 36 )

+ ( 36 )

(7)

+ 0

< 7 and to choose

(7)
36 )

( P36 )(7) and ( Q36 )(7) large to have

368

( 36 )(7)+ 0

369
( 36 )

(7)

370
( ) 7

( 36 )(7) + 0

(36 ) 7

( 36 )(7)+ 0

+ ( 36 )(7) ( 36 )(7)

In order that the operator (7) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , satisfying 37,35,36 into itself

371

The operator (7) is a contraction with respect to the metric

372

39

, 39

39
2

, 39

(36 ) 7

, 1 2 (36 )

Indeed if we denote
Definition of 39 , 39 :
39 , 39

= (7) ( 39 , 39 )

It results
7
7

(36 ) 7 371 372 ( 36 ) 36 ( 36 ) 36


0
7
7

{(36
) 7 361 362 ( 36 ) 36 ( 36 ) 36 +
0
7
7

(36
) 7 371 , 36 361 362 ( 36 ) 36 ( 36 ) 36 +

361 2

www.ijmer.com

36 +

2137 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
7
7

362 |(36
) 7 371 , 36 (36
) 7 372 , 36 | ( 36 ) 36 ( 36 ) 36 } 36
Where 36 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0, t
From the hypotheses it follows
373
39
1
( 36 ) 7

39
(36 )

( 36 )

(36
)7

+ ( 36 ) 7 + ( 36 )

( 36 ) 7

39

, 39

; 39

, 39

And analogous inequalities for . Taking into account the hypothesis (37,35,36) the result follows

374

Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (36


) 7 and (36
) 7 depending also on t can be considered as not
conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition
7
7
necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( 36 ) 7 ( 36 ) ( 36 ) 7 ( 36 )
respectively of + .

375

If instead of proving the existence of the solution on + , we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to
consider that ( ) 7 and ( ) 7 , = 36,37,38 depend only on T37 and respectively on 39 ( )
and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition.
376
Remark 2: There does not exist any where = 0 = 0
From 79 to 36 it results
0
0

0 ( ) 7 ( ) 7 37 36 , 36

( ) 7

Definition of ( 36 ) 7

36

> 0 for t > 0


1

, ( 36 ) 7

( 36 ) 7

377

Remark 3: if 36 is bounded, the same property have also 37 38 . indeed if


36 < ( 36 ) 7 it follows
37 ( 36 ) 7

37

( 36 ) 7

(37
) 7 37 and by integrating

0
= 37
+ 2(37 ) 7 ( 36 ) 7

/(37
)7

/(38
)7

In the same way , one can obtain


38 ( 36 ) 7

0
= 38
+ 2(38 ) 7 ( 36 ) 7

If 37 38 is bounded, the same property follows for 36 , 38 and 36 , 37 respectively.


Remark 7: If 36 bounded, from below, the same property holds for 37 38 . The proof is analogous
with the preceding one. An analogous property is true if 37 is bounded from below.

378

Remark 5: If T36 is bounded from below and lim (( ) 7 ( 39 , )) = (37


) 7 then 37 .

379

Definition of

and 7 :

Indeed let 7 be so that for > 7


(37 ) 7 ( ) 7 ( 39 , ) < 7 , 36 () >
Then

37

(37 ) 7

7 37 which leads to
www.ijmer.com

380
2138 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com
37
37

( 37 ) 7 7

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
1

0 7
1 7 + 37

If we take t such that 7 =

7
( 37 ) 7 7

, =

it results

By taking now 7 sufficiently small one sees that T37 is unbounded. The

same property holds for 38 if lim (38


) 7 39 , = (38
)7
We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions of equations 37 to 72

In order that the operator (7) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , satisfying GLOBAL
EQUATIONS AND ITS CONCOMITANT CONDITIONALITIES into itself

382
383

The operator (7) is a contraction with respect to the metric

39

39

, 39

, 39

(36 ) 7

381

, 1 2 (36 )

Indeed if we denote
Definition of 39 , 39 :
= (7) ( 39 , 39 )

39 , 39
It results

7
7

(36 ) 7 371 372 ( 36 ) 36 ( 36 ) 36 36


0
7
7

{(36
) 7 361 362 ( 36 ) 36 ( 36 ) 36 +
0
7
7

(36
) 7 371 , 36 361 362 ( 36 ) 36 ( 36 ) 36 +
7

362 |(36
) 7 371 , 36 (36
) 7 372 , 36 | ( 36 ) 36

361 2

( 36 )

7
36

} 36

Where 36 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0, t


From the hypotheses it follows
384
39
1
( 36 ) 7

39
(36 )

( 36 )

(36
)7

+ ( 36 ) 7 + ( 36 )

( 36 ) 7

39

, 39

; 39

, 39

And analogous inequalities for . Taking into account the hypothesis the result follows

Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (36


) 7 and (36
) 7 depending also on t can be considered as not
conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition
7
7
necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( 36 ) 7 ( 36 ) ( 36 ) 7 ( 36 )
respectively of + .
If instead of proving the existence of the solution on + , we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to
consider that ( ) 7 and ( ) 7 , = 36,37,38 depend only on T37 and respectively on 39 ( )
and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition.
Remark 2: There does not exist any where = 0 = 0
From CONCATENATED GLOBAL EQUATIONS it results

385

386

0 0 ( ) ( ) 37 36 , 36 36 0
7
0 ( ) > 0 for t > 0
Definition of ( 36 ) 7 1 , ( 36 ) 7 2 ( 36 ) 7 3 :
Remark 3: if 36 is bounded, the same property have also 37 38 . indeed if

36 < ( 36 ) 7 it follows 37 ( 36 ) 7 1 (37


) 7 37 and by integrating

0
37 ( 36 ) 7 2 = 37
+ 2(37 ) 7 ( 36 ) 7
In the same way , one can obtain
0
38 ( 36 ) 7 3 = 38
+ 2(38 ) 7 ( 36 ) 7

/(37
)7

/(38
)7

www.ijmer.com

387

2139 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
If 37 38 is bounded, the same property follows for 36 , 38 and 36 , 37 respectively.
Remark 7: If 36 bounded, from below, the same property holds for 37 38 . The proof is analogous
with the preceding one. An analogous property is true if 37 is bounded from below.

Remark 5: If T36 is bounded from below and lim (( ) 7 ( 39 , )) = (37


) 7 then 37 .
7
Definition of
and 7 :
Indeed let 7 be so that for > 7
(37 ) 7 ( ) 7 ( 39 , ) < 7 , 36 () > 7
37
Then (37 ) 7 7 7 37 which leads to
37
37

( 37 ) 7

7
( 37 ) 7 7
2

0 7
1 7 + 37

If we take t such that 7 =

, =

2
7

1
2

388
389

390

it results

By taking now 7 sufficiently small one sees that T37 is unbounded. The

same property holds for 38 if lim (38


) 7 39 , = (38
)7
We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions

(2 ) 2 (16
) 2 + (17
) 2 (16
) 2 T17 , + (17
) 2 T17 , (1 ) 2
2

(2 ) (16 ) + (17 ) (16 )


19 , (17 ) 2 19 , (1 ) 2
2
2
2
2
Definition of (1 ) , (2 ) , (1 ) , (2 ) :
By (1 ) 2 > 0 , (2 ) 2 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 2 > 0 , (2 ) 2 < 0 the roots
2
(a) of the equations (17 ) 2 2 + (1 ) 2 2 (16 ) 2 = 0

391
392
393
394
395

and (14 ) 2 2 + (1 ) 2 2 (16 ) 2 = 0 and


Definition of (1 ) 2 , , (2 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 , (2 ) 2 :
By (1 ) 2 > 0 , (2 ) 2 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 2 > 0 , (2 ) 2 < 0 the
2
roots of the equations (17 ) 2 2 + (2 ) 2 2 (16 ) 2 = 0

396

and (17 ) 2 2 + (2 ) 2 2 (16 ) 2 = 0


Definition of (1 ) 2 , (2 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 , (2 ) 2 :(b) If we define (1 ) 2 , (2 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 , (2 ) 2 by
(2 ) 2 = (0 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 = (1 ) 2 , (0 ) 2 < (1 ) 2
(2 ) 2 = (1 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 = (1 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 < (0 ) 2 < (1 ) 2 ,

400

397
398
399

and (0 ) 2 =

401
402
403
404

G 016
G 017

( 2 ) 2 = (1 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 = (0 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 < (0 ) 2
and analogously
(2 ) 2 = (0 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 = (1 ) 2 , (0 ) 2 < (1 ) 2
(2 ) 2 = (1 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 = (1 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 < (0 ) 2 < (1 ) 2 ,

405
406

T0

and (0 ) 2 = T 16
0
17

( 2 ) 2 = (1 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 = (0 ) 2 , (1 ) 2 < (0 ) 2
Then the solution satisfies the inequalities
2
2
0
0 (S 1 ) 2 t
G16
e (S 1 ) (16 ) t 16 G16
e
( ) 2 is defined
2
2
1
1
0
0 (S 1 ) 2
G16
e (S 1 ) (16 ) t 17 () ( ) 2 G16
e
( ) 2
1

( ) 2 G 016
( ( ) 2 (S ) 18
2 ( ) 2 (S ) 2
1
1
16
2
( 18 ) 2 G 016
(S 1 ) 2 t
) 2 [e
( 2 ) 2 (S 1 ) 2 ( 18
0 (R 1 )
T16
e
1
( 1 ) 2

e( 18 )

16 () (

(18 ) 2 T 016
)2
( 1 ) 2 (R 1 ) 2 (18
( 18 ) 2 T 016

e(R 1 )

409
410

(S 1 ) 2 (16 ) 2 t

0
16 () T16
e (R 1 )

0 (R 1 )
T16
e

407
408

2 t

2 +( ) 2
16

1
2
2)

0
T16
e

e(18 )

e(S 2 )

2 t

0 ( 18 )
] + G18
e

0 (S 2 )
+ G18
e

2 t

2 t

411

)
412

(R 1 ) 2 +(16 ) 2

G18 ()

0 (18 )
+ T18
e

413
2

2
2
2
e (R 1 ) +(16 ) e(R 2 )
( 2 ) 2 (R 1 ) 2 +(16 ) 2 +(R 2 ) 2
Definition of (S1 ) 2 , (S2 ) 2 , (R1 ) 2 , (R 2 ) 2 :
Where (S1 ) 2 = (16 ) 2 (2 ) 2 (16
)2
2
2
2
(S2 ) = (18 ) (18 )

(1 ) 2 = (16 ) 2 (2 ) 1 (16
)2

18 ()

0 (R 2 )
+ T18
e

www.ijmer.com

414

415
416
417
2140 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

(R 2 ) 2 = (18
) 2 (18 ) 2
Behavior of the solutions
If we denote and define
Definition of (1 ) 3 , (2 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 , (2 ) 3 :
(a) 1 ) 3 , (2 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 , (2 ) 3 four constants satisfying

(2 ) 3 (20
) 3 + (21
) 3 (20
) 3 21 , + (21
) 3 21 , (1 ) 3
3

3
(2 ) (20 ) + (21 ) (20 ) , (21 )
23 , (1 ) 3
3
3
3
3
Definition of (1 ) , (2 ) , (1 ) , (2 ) :
(b) By
(1 ) 3 > 0 , (2 ) 3 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 3 > 0 , (2 ) 3 < 0 the roots of
2
3
(21 ) 3 + (1 ) 3 3 (20 ) 3 = 0

418
419

420
the equations

and (21 ) 3 3 + (1 ) 3 3 (20 ) 3 = 0 and


By (1 ) 3 > 0 , (2 ) 3 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 3 > 0 , (2 ) 3 < 0 the
2
roots of the equations (21 ) 3 3 + (2 ) 3 3 (20 ) 3 = 0
2

and (21 ) 3 3 + (2 ) 3 3 (20 ) 3 = 0


Definition of (1 ) 3 , (2 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 , (2 ) 3 :(c) If we define (1 ) 3 , (2 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 , (2 ) 3 by
(2 ) 3 = (0 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 = (1 ) 3 , (0 ) 3 < (1 ) 3
(2 ) 3 = (1 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 = (1 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 < (0 ) 3 < (1 ) 3 ,
and (0 ) 3 =

421

0
20
0
21

( 2 ) 3 = (1 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 = (0 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 < (0 ) 3
and analogously
(2 ) 3 = (0 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 = (1 ) 3 , (0 ) 3 < (1 ) 3

422
0

(2 ) 3 = (1 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 = (1 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 < (0 ) 3 < (1 ) 3 ,

and (0 ) 3 = 20
0
21

( 2 ) 3 = (1 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 = (0 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 < (0 ) 3
Then the solution satisfies the inequalities
3
3
0
0 (1 ) 3
20
(1 ) (20 ) 20 () 20

( ) 3 is defined
3
3
1
1
0
0 (1 ) 3
20
(1 ) (20 ) 21 () ( ) 3 20

( ) 3
1

0
( 22 ) 3 20
3
3
( 1 )
(1 ) (20 ) 3 (2 ) 3
0
( 22 ) 3 20
(1 ) 3
)3
( 2 ) 3 (1 ) 3 ( 22
0 (1 ) 3
0

20

1
( 1 ) 3

( 22 )

20 () 20

0 (1 )
20

20 ()

0
(22 ) 3 20
)3
( 1 ) 3 (1 ) 3 (22

(1 )

2
(1 ) 3 (20 ) 3
3

(2 )

423
424

0 ( 22 )
] + 22

0 (2 )
+ 22

22 ()

)
426

(1 ) 3 +(20 ) 3

1
( 2 ) 3

0
20

(22 )

(1 ) 3 +(20 ) 3

0 (22 )
+ 22

0
( 22 ) 3 20

427
3

3
3
3
(1 ) +(20 ) (2 )
(1 ) 3 +(20 ) 3 +(2 ) 3
Definition of (1 ) 3 , (2 ) 3 , (1 ) 3 , (2 ) 3 :
Where (1 ) 3 = (20 ) 3 (2 ) 3 (20
)3
3
3
3
(2 ) = (22 ) (22 )

(1 ) 3 = (20 ) 3 (2 ) 3 (20
)3
3

3
3
(2 ) = (22 ) (22 )

( 2 ) 3

425

22 ()

0 (2 )
+ 22

428

429

430
431
432
If we denote and define
Definition of (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4 :
(d) (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4

four constants satisfying

(2 ) 4 (24
) 4 + (25
) 4 (24
) 4 25 , + (25
) 4 25 , (1 ) 4

www.ijmer.com

2141 | P a g e

(2 ) 4

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

(24
) 4 + (25
) 4 (24
) 4 27 , (25
) 4 27 , (1 ) 4

Definition of (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4 ,

433

(e) By (1 ) 4 > 0 , (2 ) 4 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 4 > 0 , (2 ) 4 < 0 the roots of


2
(25 ) 4 4 + (1 ) 4 4 (24 ) 4 = 0
and (25 ) 4

+ (1 ) 4

the equations

(24 ) 4 = 0 and

Definition of (1 ) 4 , , (2 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4 :

434
435

By (1 ) 4 > 0 , (2 ) 4 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 4 > 0 , (2 ) 4 < 0 the


2
roots of the equations (25 ) 4 4 + (2 ) 4 4 (24 ) 4 = 0
2

and (25 ) 4 4 + (2 ) 4 4 (24 ) 4 = 0


Definition of (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4 , (0 ) 4 :(f) If we define (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4

436

by

(2 ) 4 = (0 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 = (1 ) 4 , (0 ) 4 < (1 ) 4
(2 ) 4 = (1 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 = (1 ) 4 , (4 ) 4 < (0 ) 4 < (1 ) 4 ,
0

and (0 ) 4 = 24
0
25

( 2 ) 4 = (4 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 = (0 ) 4 , (4 ) 4 < (0 ) 4
and analogously

437
438

(2 ) 4 = (0 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 = (1 ) 4 , (0 ) 4 < (1 ) 4
(2 ) 4 = (1 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 = (1 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 < (0 ) 4 < (1 ) 4 ,
and (0 ) 4 =

0
24
0
25

( 2 ) 4 = (1 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 = (0 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 < (0 ) 4 where (1 ) 4 , (1 ) 4
are defined respectively
Then the solution satisfies the inequalities
0
24

(1 ) 4 (24 ) 4

0 (1 )
24 24

439
440
441
442
443
444
445

where ( ) 4 is defined

1
( 1 ) 4

0
24

(1 ) 4 (24 ) 4

0
( 26 ) 4 24

( 1 ) 4

25 (

(1 ) 4 (24 ) 4 (2 ) 4

1
2)

(1 ) 4 (24 ) 4

0 (1 )
24

(2 )

446
447
0 (2 )
+ 26

26

448

(26)4240(2)4(1)4(26)4(1)4(26)4+ 260(26)4

0 (1 )
24

1
( 1 ) 4

0
24 24

0 (1 )
24

24 () (

0
(26 ) 4 24
)4
( 1 ) 4 (1 ) 4 (26

(1 )

449

(1 ) 4 +(24 ) 4

1
2)

0
24

(26 )

(1 ) 4 +(24 ) 4

0 (26 )
+ 26

450
4

26 ()

www.ijmer.com

451

2142 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com
0
( 26 ) 4 24
( 2 ) 4 (1 ) 4 +(24 ) 4 +(2 ) 4

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
(1 ) 4 +(24 ) 4

(2 )

0 (2 )
+ 26

Definition of (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4 , (1 ) 4 , (2 ) 4 :-

452

Where (1 ) 4 = (24 ) 4 (2 ) 4 (24


)4

(2 ) 4 = (26 ) 4 (26 ) 4

(1 ) 4 = (24 ) 4 (2 ) 4 (24
)4

453

(2 ) 4 = (26
) 4 (26 ) 4

454

Behavior of the solutions


If we denote and define
Definition of (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5 :
(g) (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5

four constants satisfying

(2 ) 5 (28
) 5 + (29
) 5 (28
) 5 29 , + (29
) 5 29 , (1 ) 5

(2 ) 5 (28
) 5 + (29
) 5 (28
)5

31 , (29
)5

Definition of (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5 ,

31 , (1 ) 5

(h) By (1 ) 5 > 0 , (2 ) 5 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 5 > 0 , (2 ) 5 < 0 the roots of


2
(29 ) 5 5 + (1 ) 5 5 (28 ) 5 = 0
and (29 ) 5

+ (1 ) 5

455

:
the equations

(28 ) 5 = 0 and

Definition of (1 ) 5 , , (2 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5 :

456

By (1 ) 5 > 0 , (2 ) 5 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 5 > 0 , (2 ) 5 < 0 the


2
roots of the equations (29 ) 5 5 + (2 ) 5 5 (28 ) 5 = 0
2

and (29 ) 5 5 + (2 ) 5 5 (28 ) 5 = 0


Definition of (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5 , (0 ) 5 :(i) If we define (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5

by

(2 ) 5 = (0 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 = (1 ) 5 , (0 ) 5 < (1 ) 5
(2 ) 5 = (1 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 = (1 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 < (0 ) 5 < (1 ) 5 ,
0

and (0 ) 5 = 28
0
29

( 2 ) 5 = (1 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 = (0 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 < (0 ) 5
and analogously

457

(2 ) 5 = (0 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 = (1 ) 5 , (0 ) 5 < (1 ) 5
(2 ) 5 = (1 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 = (1 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 < (0 ) 5 < (1 ) 5 ,
and (0 ) 5 =

0
28
0
29

( 2 ) 5 = (1 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 = (0 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 < (0 ) 5 where (1 ) 5 , (1 ) 5
are defined respectively
Then the solution satisfies the inequalities

458
www.ijmer.com

2143 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com
0
28

(1 ) 5 (28 ) 5

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

0 (1 )
28 () 28

where ( ) 5 is defined
1
0
(1 ) 5 (28 ) 5
5 28

( 5 )

0
( 30 ) 5 28

29 ()

( 1 ) 5 (1 ) 5 (28 ) 5 (2 ) 5

1
( 2 ) 5

(1 ) 5 (28 ) 5

0 (1 )
28

459

(2 ) 5

0 (2 ) 5
+ 30

460
461

30

(30)5280(2)5(1)5(30)5(1)5(30)5+ 300(30)5
0 (1 )
28

1
( 1 ) 5

0
28 () 28

0 (1 )
28

28 ()

0
(30 ) 5 28
)5
( 1 ) 5 (1 ) 5 (30

(1 )

0
( 30 ) 5 28
( 2 ) 5 (1 ) 5 +(28 ) 5 +(2 ) 5

(1 ) 5 +(28 ) 5

462

1
( 2 ) 5

463

0
28

(30 )

(1 ) 5 +(28 ) 5

0 (30 )
+ 30

(1 ) 5 +(28 ) 5

(2 )

464

30 ()

0 (2 )
+ 30

Definition of (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5 , (1 ) 5 , (2 ) 5 :-

465

Where (1 ) 5 = (28 ) 5 (2 ) 5 (28


)5

(2 ) 5 = (30 ) 5 (30 ) 5

(1 ) 5 = (28 ) 5 (2 ) 5 (28
)5

(2 ) 5 = (30
) 5 (30 ) 5

466

Behavior of the solutions


If we denote and define
Definition of (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6 :
(j) (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6

four constants satisfying

(2 ) 6 (32
) 6 + (33
) 6 (32
) 6 33 , + (33
) 6 33 , (1 ) 6

(2 ) 6 (32
) 6 + (33
) 6 (32
)6

35 , (33
)6

Definition of (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6 ,

35 , (1 ) 6

(k) By (1 ) 6 > 0 , (2 ) 6 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 6 > 0 , (2 ) 6 < 0 the roots of


2
(33 ) 6 6 + (1 ) 6 6 (32 ) 6 = 0
and (33 ) 6

+ (1 ) 6

467

:
the equations

(32 ) 6 = 0 and

Definition of (1 ) 6 , , (2 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6 :

468

By (1 ) 6 > 0 , (2 ) 6 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 6 > 0 , (2 ) 6 < 0 the


2
roots of the equations (33 ) 6 6 + (2 ) 6 6 (32 ) 6 = 0
2

and (33 ) 6 6 + (2 ) 6 6 (32 ) 6 = 0


Definition of (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6 , (0 ) 6 :(l) If we define (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6

by

(2 ) 6 = (0 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 = (1 ) 6 , (0 ) 6 < (1 ) 6
www.ijmer.com

2144 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
470

(2 )

= (1 )

and (0 )

, (1 )

= (6 )

, (1 )

< (0 )

< (1 )

0
32

= 0

33

( 2 ) 6 = (1 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 = (0 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 < (0 ) 6
and analogously

471

(2 ) 6 = (0 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 = (1 ) 6 , (0 ) 6 < (1 ) 6
(2 ) 6 = (1 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 = (1 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 < (0 ) 6 < (1 ) 6 ,
0

and (0 ) 6 = 32
0
33

( 2 ) 6 = (1 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 = (0 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 < (0 ) 6 where (1 ) 6 , (1 ) 6
are defined respectively
Then the solution satisfies the inequalities
0
32

(1 ) 6 (32 ) 6

0 (1 )
32 () 32

where ( ) 6 is defined
6
6
1
0
32
(1 ) (32 )
( ) 6

0
( 34 ) 6 32
( 1 ) 6 (1 ) 6 (32 ) 6 (2 ) 6

472
6

33 () (

1
2)

(1 ) 6 (32 ) 6

0 (1 )
32

(2 )

473
0 (2 )
+ 34

474

34

(34)6320(2)6(1)6(34)6(1)6(34)6+ 340(34)6
0 (1 )
32

1
( 1 ) 6

0
32 () 32

0 (1 )
32

32 () (

0
(34 ) 6 32
)6
( 1 ) 6 (1 ) 6 (34

(1 )

0
( 34 ) 6 32

( 2 ) 6

(1 ) 6 +(32 ) 6 +(2 ) 6

475

(1 ) 6 +(32 ) 6

1
6
2)

0
32

(34 )

(1 ) 6 +(32 ) 6

0 (34 )
+ 34

(1 ) 6 +(32 ) 6

(2 )

476
6

477

34 ()

0 (2 )
+ 34

Definition of (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6 , (1 ) 6 , (2 ) 6 :-

478

Where (1 ) 6 = (32 ) 6 (2 ) 6 (32


)6

(2 ) 6 = (34 ) 6 (34 ) 6

(1 ) 6 = (32 ) 6 (2 ) 6 (32
)6

(2 ) 6 = (34
) 6 (34 ) 6

479
If we denote and define
Definition of (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 :
(m) (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 four constants satisfying

(2 ) 7 (36
) 7 + (37
) 7 (36
) 7 37 , + (37
) 7 37 , (1 ) 7
7

(2 ) (36 ) + (37 ) (36 )


39 , (37
) 7 39 , (1 ) 7
Definition of (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , 7 , 7 :
(n) By
(1 ) 7 > 0 , (2 ) 7 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 7 > 0 , (2 ) 7 < 0 the roots of
2
7
(37 ) 7 + (1 ) 7 7 (36 ) 7 = 0
and (37 ) 7

+ (1 ) 7

480
the equations
481

(36 ) 7 = 0 and
www.ijmer.com

2145 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
Definition of (1 ) 7 , , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 :
By (1 ) 7 > 0 , (2 ) 7 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 7 > 0 , (2 ) 7 < 0 the
2
roots of the equations (37 ) 7 7 + (2 ) 7 7 (36 ) 7 = 0

482

and (37 ) 7 7 + (2 ) 7 7 (36 ) 7 = 0


Definition of (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (0 ) 7 :(o) If we define (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7

by

(2 ) 7 = (0 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (0 ) 7 < (1 ) 7
(2 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 < (0 ) 7 < (1 ) 7 ,
0

and (0 ) 7 = 36
0
37

( 2 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (0 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 < (0 ) 7
and analogously
(2 ) 7 = (0 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (0 ) 7 < (1 ) 7
(2 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 < (0 ) 7 < (1 ) 7 ,

483

and (0 ) 7 = 36
0
37

( 2 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (0 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 < (0 ) 7 where (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7
are defined respectively
Then the solution satisfies the inequalities
0
36

(1 ) 7 (36 ) 7

484
7

0 (1 )
36 () 36

where ( ) 7 is defined

7
7
0
36
(1 ) (36 )
( 7 ) 7

37 ()

485
486

0 (1 ) 7
36

( 2 ) 7

487
0
( 38 ) 7 36

(1 ) 7 (36 ) 7

(2 ) 7

+
( 1 ) 7 (1 ) 7 (36 ) 7 (2 ) 7
0
7

)7
7
( 38 ) 36
(1 ) 7
0 ( 38
( 38 ) ] + 38

)
) 7 [
( 2 ) 7 (1 ) 7 ( 38
0 (1 )
36

1
( 1 ) 7
( 1 ) 7

0
36 () 36

0 (1 )
36

36 ()

0
(38 ) 7 36
)7
(1 ) 7 (38

(1 )

488

1
( 2 ) 7

489

0
36

(38 )

(1 ) 7 +(36 ) 7

0 (38 )
+ 38

0
( 38 ) 7 36

7
7
7
(1 ) +(36 ) (2 )
(1 ) 7 +(36 ) 7 +(2 ) 7
Definition of (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 :
Where (1 ) 7 = (36 ) 7 (2 ) 7 (36
)7
7
7
7
(2 ) = (38 ) (38 )

(1 ) 7 = (36 ) 7 (2 ) 7 (36
)7
7

7
7
(2 ) = (38 ) (38 )

38 ()

0 (2 )
+ 38

490

491

From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain

38 ()

(1 ) 7 +(36 ) 7

( 2 ) 7

0 (2 ) 7
38

492

= (36 ) 7 (36
) 7 (37
) 7 + (36
) 7 37 ,

www.ijmer.com

2146 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

Definition of

:-

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

(37
) 7 37 , 7 (37 ) 7 7

= 36
37

It follows
(37 ) 7

+ (2 ) 7

(36 ) 7

(37 ) 7

+ (1 ) 7

(36 ) 7

From which one obtains


Definition of (1 ) 7 , (0 ) 7 :(a) For 0 < (0 ) 7 =

()

0
36
0
37

< (1 ) 7 < (1 ) 7

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 0 ) 7
( 1 ) 7 +() 7 ( 2 ) 7
37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 0 ) 7
1+() 7

it follows (0 ) 7

( ) 7 ( 0 ) 7
( 2 ) 7
0

() 7 = ( 1 ) 7

() (1 ) 7

In the same manner , we get

()

493

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
( 1 ) 7 +( ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
7

37
1+( ) 7

( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7

From which we deduce (0 ) 7


(b) If 0 < (1 ) 7 < (0 )
(1 ) 7

( ) 7 ( 0 ) 7

, ( ) 7 = ( 1 ) 7
0

( 2 ) 7

() (1 ) 7

494

7
= 36
we find like in the previous case,
0 < (1 )
37

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
( 1 ) 7 + 7 ( 2 ) 7
37
1+ 7

( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
( 1 ) 7 + 7 ( 2 ) 7
37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
1+ 7

(1 ) 7
495

(c) If 0 < (1 ) 7 (1 ) 7 (0 ) 7 = 36
, we obtain
0
37

(1 ) 7

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
( 1 ) 7 + 7 ( 2 ) 7
37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
1+ 7

(0 ) 7

And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have
Definition of 7 :(2 ) 7

(1 ) 7 ,

36
37

In a completely analogous way, we obtain


Definition of 7 :(2 ) 7

(1 ) 7 ,

= 36

37

Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem.
Particular case :

If (36
) 7 = (37
) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (2 ) 7 and in this case (1 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 if in addition (0 ) 7 = (1 ) 7
7
then = (0 ) 7 and as a consequence 36 () = (0 ) 7 37 () this also defines (0 ) 7 for the special
case .

Analogously if (36
) 7 = (37
) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (2 ) 7 and then
www.ijmer.com

2147 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
(1 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 if in addition (0 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 then 36 () = (0 ) 7 37 () This is an important consequence
of the relation between (1 ) 7 and (1 ) 7 , and definition of (0 ) 7 .
We can prove the following
If ( ) 7 ( ) 7 are independent on , and the conditions

(36
) 7 (37
) 7 36 7 37 7 < 0

(36 ) (37 ) 7 36 7 37 7 + 36 7 36 7 + (37


) 7 37

(36
) 7 (37
) 7 36

37

>0,

(36
) 7 (37
) 7 36

37

(36
) 7 37

(37
) 7 37

+ 36

+ 36

37

37

496
496A
496B
496C
497C
497D
497E
497F
497G

>0

<0

36 7 , 37 7 as defined are satisfied , then the system WITH THE SATISFACTION OF THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTIES HAS A SOLUTION AS DERIVED BELOW.
.
Particular case :

If (16
) 2 = (17
) 2 , (1 ) 2 = (2 ) 2 and in this case (1 ) 2 = (1 ) 2 if in addition (0 ) 2 = (1 ) 2
2
then = (0 ) 2 and as a consequence 16 () = (0 ) 2 17 ()

Analogously if (16
) 2 = (17
) 2 , (1 ) 2 = (2 ) 2 and then
2
2
(1 ) = (1 ) if in addition (0 ) 2 = (1 ) 2 then 16 () = (0 ) 2 17 () This is an important consequence
of the relation between (1 ) 2 and (1 ) 2

499
500

From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain


3

= (20 ) 3 (20
) 3 (21
) 3 + (20
) 3 21 ,

Definition of

:-

(21
) 3 21 ,

(21 ) 3

501

= 20

497
498

21

It follows
(21 ) 3

+ (2 ) 3

(20 ) 3

(21 ) 3

+ (1 ) 3

(20 ) 3
502

From which one obtains


0

3
(a) For 0 < (0 ) 3 = 20
< (1 ) 3
0 < (1 )
21

()

21 3 ( 1 ) 3 ( 0 ) 3
( 1 ) 3 +() 3 ( 2 ) 3
21
1+() 3

( 1 ) 3 ( 0 ) 3

( ) 3 ( 0 ) 3
( 2 ) 3
0

() 3 = ( 1 ) 3

it follows (0 ) 3 3 () (1 ) 3
In the same manner , we get

()

503

21 3 ( 1 ) 3 ( 2 ) 3
( 1 ) 3 +( ) 3 ( 2 ) 3

21 3 ( 1 ) 3 ( 2 ) 3
1+( ) 3
3
Definition of (1 ) :From which we deduce (0 ) 3 3 ()
0
3
(b) If 0 < (1 ) 3 < (0 ) 3 = 20
0 < (1 )

, ( ) 3 =

( 1 ) 3 ( 0 ) 3
( 0 ) 3 ( 2 ) 3

(1 ) 3
we find like in the previous case,

504

21

(1 ) 3

21 3 ( 1 ) 3 ( 2 ) 3
( 1 ) 3 + 3 ( 2 ) 3
3

( 1 ) 3 ( 2 ) 3

21
1+ 3
21 3 ( 1 ) 3 ( 2 ) 3
3
3
3
( 1 ) +
( 2 )
21 3 ( 1 ) 3 ( 2 ) 3
3
1+

(c) If 0 < (1 ) 3 (1 )
(1 ) 3

(1 ) 3
0

505

(0 ) 3 = 20
0 , we obtain

( 1 ) 3 + 3 ( 2 ) 3
21
1+ 3

21
21 3 ( 1 ) 3 ( 2 ) 3
3

( 1 ) 3 ( 2 ) 3

(0 )

And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have
Definition of 3 :(2 ) 3

(1 ) 3 ,

= 20

21

www.ijmer.com

2148 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
In a completely analogous way, we obtain
Definition of 3 :(2 ) 3

(1 ) 3 ,

= 20

21

Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem.
Particular case :

If (20
) 3 = (21
) 3 , (1 ) 3 = (2 ) 3 and in this case (1 ) 3 = (1 ) 3 if in addition (0 ) 3 = (1 ) 3
3
then = (0 ) 3 and as a consequence 20 () = (0 ) 3 21 ()

Analogously if (20
) 3 = (21
) 3 , (1 ) 3 = (2 ) 3 and then
3
3
(1 ) = (1 ) if in addition (0 ) 3 = (1 ) 3 then 20 () = (0 ) 3 21 () This is an important consequence
of the relation between (1 ) 3 and (1 ) 3
506
507

: From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain


4

= (24 ) 4 (24
) 4 (25
) 4 + (24
) 4 25 ,

Definition of

:-

(25
) 4 25 ,

(25 ) 4

= 24

508

25

It follows
2

(25 ) 4 4 + (2 ) 4
From which one obtains

(24 ) 4

(25 ) 4

+ (4 ) 4

(24 ) 4

Definition of (1 ) 4 , (0 ) 4 :0

4
(d) For 0 < (0 ) 4 = 24
< (1 ) 4
0 < (1 )
25

25 4 ( 1 ) 4 ( 0 ) 4
( 1 ) 4 + 4 ( 2 ) 4
25 4
4+ 4

it follows (0 ) 4

( 1 ) 4 ( 0 ) 4

( ) 4 ( 0 ) 4

= ( 1 ) 4
0

( 2 ) 4

() (1 ) 4

In the same manner , we get

509

25 4 ( 1 ) 4 ( 2 ) 4
( 1 ) 4 + 4 ( 2 ) 4
25
4+ 4

( 1 ) 4 ( 2 ) 4

From which we deduce (0 ) 4


(e) If 0 < (1 ) 4 < (0 )
(1 ) 4

() (1 ) 4

4
= 24
we find like in the previous case,
0 < (1 )

25 4 ( 1 ) 4 ( 2 ) 4
1+ 4

25 4 ( 1 ) 4 ( 2 ) 4
( 1 ) 4 + 4 ( 2 ) 4
25 4 ( 1 ) 4 ( 2 ) 4
1+ 4

(f) If 0 < (1 ) 4 (1 ) 4 (0 ) 4 =

510

25

25 4 ( 1 ) 4 ( 2 ) 4
( 1 ) 4 + 4 ( 2 ) 4

(1 ) 4

( ) 4 ( 0 ) 4
( 2 ) 4
0

, ( ) 4 = ( 1 ) 4

0
24
0
25

(1 ) 4
511
512

, we obtain

25 4 ( 1 ) 4 ( 2 ) 4
( 1 ) 4 + 4 ( 2 ) 4
25 4 ( 1 ) 4 ( 2 ) 4
1+ 4

(0 ) 4

And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have
Definition of 4 :www.ijmer.com

2149 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com
(2 ) 4

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

(1 ) 4 ,

24
25

In a completely analogous way, we obtain


Definition of 4 :(2 ) 4

(1 ) 4 ,

24
25

Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem.
Particular case :

If (24
) 4 = (25
) 4 , (1 ) 4 = (2 ) 4 and in this case (1 ) 4 = (1 ) 4 if in addition (0 ) 4 = (1 ) 4
4
then = (0 ) 4 and as a consequence 24 () = (0 ) 4 25 () this also defines (0 ) 4 for the special
case .

513

Analogously if (24
) 4 = (25
) 4 , (1 ) 4 = (2 ) 4 and then
4
4
(1 ) = (4 ) if in addition (0 ) 4 = (1 ) 4 then 24 () = (0 ) 4 25 () This is an important consequence
of the relation between (1 ) 4 and (1 ) 4 , and definition of (0 ) 4 .

514
515

From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain


5

= (28 ) 5 (28
) 5 (29
) 5 + (28
) 5 29 ,

Definition of

:-

(29
) 5 29 ,

(29 ) 5

= 28
29

It follows
(29 ) 5

+ (2 ) 5

(28 ) 5

(29 ) 5

+ (1 ) 5

( 1 ) 5 ( 0 ) 5
( 0 ) 5 ( 2 ) 5

(28 ) 5

From which one obtains


Definition of (1 ) 5 , (0 ) 5 :0

5
(g) For 0 < (0 ) 5 = 28
< (1 ) 5
0 < (1 )
29

()

29 5 ( 1 ) 5 ( 0 ) 5
( 1 ) 5 +() 5 ( 2 ) 5

5+() 5

it follows (0 ) 5

29 5 ( 1 ) 5 ( 0 ) 5

() 5 =

() (1 ) 5

In the same manner , we get

()

516

29 5 ( 1 ) 5 ( 2 ) 5
( 1 ) 5 +( ) 5 ( 2 ) 5
29
5+( ) 5

From which we deduce (0 ) 5


(h) If 0 < (1 ) 5 < (0 )
(1 ) 5

( 1 ) 5 ( 2 ) 5

( ) 5 ( 0 ) 5

, ( ) 5 = ( 1 ) 5
0

( 2 ) 5

() (5 ) 5

5
= 28
we find like in the previous case,
0 < (1 )

517

29

29 5 ( 1 ) 5 ( 2 ) 5
( 1 ) 5 + 5 ( 2 ) 5
29 5 ( 1 ) 5 ( 2 ) 5
1+ 5

www.ijmer.com

2150 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

29 5 ( 1 ) 5 ( 2 ) 5
( 1 ) 5 + 5 ( 2 ) 5
29 5 ( 1 ) 5 ( 2 ) 5
1+ 5

(1 ) 5
518

(i) If 0 < (1 ) 5 (1 ) 5 (0 ) 5 = 28
, we obtain
0
29

(1 ) 5

29 5 ( 1 ) 5 ( 2 ) 5
( 1 ) 5 + 5 ( 2 ) 5
29 5
1+ 5

( 1 ) 5 ( 2 ) 5

(0 ) 5
519

And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have
Definition of 5 :(2 ) 5

(1 ) 5 ,

28

29

In a completely analogous way, we obtain


Definition of 5 :(2 ) 5

(1 ) 5 ,

= 28

29

Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem.
Particular case :

If (28
) 5 = (29
) 5 , (1 ) 5 = (2 ) 5 and in this case (1 ) 5 = (1 ) 5 if in addition (0 ) 5 = (5 ) 5
5
then = (0 ) 5 and as a consequence 28 () = (0 ) 5 29 () this also defines (0 ) 5 for the special
case .

Analogously if (28
) 5 = (29
) 5 , (1 ) 5 = (2 ) 5 and then
5
5
(1 ) = (1 ) if in addition (0 ) 5 = (1 ) 5 then 28 () = (0 ) 5 29 () This is an important consequence
of the relation between (1 ) 5 and (1 ) 5 , and definition of (0 ) 5 .

520
521

we obtain
6

= (32 ) 6 (32
) 6 (33
) 6 + (32
) 6 33 ,

Definition of

:-

(33
) 6 33 ,

(33 ) 6

32
33

It follows
(33 ) 6

+ (2 ) 6

(32 ) 6

(33 ) 6

+ (1 ) 6

( 1 ) 6 ( 0 ) 6
( 0 ) 6 ( 2 ) 6

(32 ) 6

From which one obtains


Definition of (1 ) 6 , (0 ) 6 :(j) For 0 < (0 ) 6 =

()

0
32
0
33

< (1 ) 6 < (1 ) 6

33 6 ( 1 ) 6 ( 0 ) 6
( 1 ) 6 +() 6 ( 2 ) 6
33 6 ( 1 ) 6 ( 0 ) 6
1+() 6

it follows (0 ) 6

() 6 =

() (1 ) 6

In the same manner , we get

522
523
www.ijmer.com

2151 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

()

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

33 6 ( 1 ) 6 ( 2 ) 6
( 1 ) 6 +( ) 6 ( 2 ) 6
6

33
1+( ) 6

( 1 ) 6 ( 2 ) 6

From which we deduce (0 ) 6


(k) If 0 < (1 ) 6 < (0 )
(1 ) 6

0
32

, ( ) 6 =

( 1 ) 6 ( 0 ) 6
( 0 ) 6 ( 2 ) 6

() (1 ) 6
524

< (1 ) 6 we find like in the previous case,

0
33

33 6 ( 1 ) 6 ( 2 ) 6
( 1 ) 6 + 6 ( 2 ) 6
33 6 ( 1 ) 6 ( 2 ) 6
1+ 6

33 6 ( 1 ) 6 ( 2 ) 6
( 1 ) 6 + 6 ( 2 ) 6
33 6 ( 1 ) 6 ( 2 ) 6
1+ 6

(1 ) 6

525

(l) If 0 < (1 ) 6 (1 ) 6 (0 ) 6 = 32
, we obtain
0
33

(1 ) 6

33 6 ( 1 ) 6 ( 2 ) 6
( 1 ) 6 + 6 ( 2 ) 6
33 6
1+ 6

( 1 ) 6 ( 2 ) 6

(0 ) 6

And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have
Definition of 6 :(2 ) 6

(1 ) 6 ,

= 32

33

In a completely analogous way, we obtain


Definition of 6 :(2 ) 6

(1 ) 6 ,

= 32

33

Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem.
Particular case :

If (32
) 6 = (33
) 6 , (1 ) 6 = (2 ) 6 and in this case (1 ) 6 = (1 ) 6 if in addition (0 ) 6 = (1 ) 6
6
then = (0 ) 6 and as a consequence 32 () = (0 ) 6 33 () this also defines (0 ) 6 for the special
case .

Analogously if (32
) 6 = (33
) 6 , (1 ) 6 = (2 ) 6 and then
(1 ) 6 = (1 ) 6 if in addition (0 ) 6 = (1 ) 6 then 32 () = (0 ) 6 33 () This is an important consequence
of the relation between (1 ) 6 and (1 ) 6 , and definition of (0 ) 6 .

526
527

Behavior of the solutions


If we denote and define
Definition of (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 :
(p) (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 four constants satisfying

(2 ) 7 (36
) 7 + (37
) 7 (36
) 7 37 , + (37
) 7 37 , (1 ) 7

(2 ) 7 (36
) 7 + (37
) 7 (36
) 7 39 , (37
) 7 39 , (1 ) 7
7
7
7
7
7
7
Definition of (1 ) , (2 ) , (1 ) , (2 ) , , :
(q) By
(1 ) 7 > 0 , (2 ) 7 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 7 > 0 , (2 ) 7 < 0 the roots of
2
(37 ) 7 7 + (1 ) 7 7 (36 ) 7 = 0

and (37 ) 7

+ (1 ) 7

528
the equations

(36 ) 7 = 0 and

529
530.

Definition of (1 ) 7 , , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 :
By (1 ) 7 > 0 , (2 ) 7 < 0 and respectively (1 ) 7 > 0 , (2 ) 7 < 0 the
www.ijmer.com

2152 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
2
roots of the equations (37 ) 7 7 + (2 ) 7 7 (36 ) 7 = 0
2

and (37 ) 7 7 + (2 ) 7 7 (36 ) 7 = 0


Definition of (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (0 ) 7 :(r) If we define (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7

by

(2 ) 7 = (0 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (0 ) 7 < (1 ) 7
(2 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 < (0 ) 7 < (1 ) 7 ,
0

and (0 ) 7 = 36
0
37

( 2 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (0 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 < (0 ) 7
and analogously

531

(2 ) 7 = (0 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (0 ) 7 < (1 ) 7
(2 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 < (0 ) 7 < (1 ) 7 ,
0

and (0 ) 7 = 36
0
37

( 2 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (0 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 < (0 ) 7 where (1 ) 7 , (1 ) 7
are defined by 59 and 67 respectively
Then the solution of GLOBAL EQUATIONS satisfies the inequalities
0
36

(1 ) 7 (36 ) 7

532

0 (1 )
36 () 36

where ( ) 7 is defined
1
( 7 ) 7

0
36

(1 ) 7 (36 ) 7

37 ()

1
( 2 ) 7

0 (1 )
36

533

534
0
( 38 ) 7 36

(1 ) 7 (36 ) 7

(2 ) 7

+
( 1 ) 7 (1 ) 7 (36 ) 7 (2 ) 7
0
7

)7
7
( 38 ) 36
(1 ) 7
0 ( 38
( 38 ) ] + 38

)
) 7 [
( 2 ) 7 (1 ) 7 ( 38
0 (1 )
36

1
( 1 ) 7

0
36 () 36

0 (1 )
36

(1 )

0
( 38 ) 7 36

( 2 ) 7

(1 ) 7 +(36 ) 7 +(2 ) 7

1
7
2)

0
36

(38 )

(1 ) 7 +(36 ) 7

536

0 (38 )
+ 38

(1 ) 7 +(36 ) 7

(2 )

38 ()

0 (2 )
+ 38

Definition of (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 , (1 ) 7 , (2 ) 7 :
Where (1 ) 7 = (36 ) 7 (2 ) 7 (36
)7

= (36 ) 7 (36
) 7 (37
) 7 + (36
) 7 37 ,

(37
)7

537

538

(2 ) 7 = (38 ) 7 (38 ) 7

(1 ) 7 = (36 ) 7 (2 ) 7 (36
)7
7

7
7
(2 ) = (38 ) (38 )
From CONCATENATED GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain
7

38 ()

535

(1 ) 7 +(36 ) 7

36 () (

0
(38 ) 7 36
)7
( 1 ) 7 (1 ) 7 (38

0 (2 ) 7
38

37 ,

539
540

(37 ) 7

www.ijmer.com

2153 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com
Definition of

:-

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

= 36
37

It follows
(37 ) 7

+ (2 ) 7

(36 ) 7

(37 ) 7

+ (1 ) 7

(36 ) 7

From which one obtains


Definition of (1 ) 7 , (0 ) 7 :0

7
(m) For 0 < (0 ) 7 = 36
< (1 ) 7
0 < (1 )
37

()

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 0 ) 7
( 1 ) 7 +() 7 ( 2 ) 7

1+() 7

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 0 ) 7

() 7 =

( 1 ) 7 ( 0 ) 7
( 0 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7

it follows (0 ) 7 7 () (1 ) 7
In the same manner , we get

()

From which we

(1 )

( )

542

37

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
( 1 ) 7 + 7 ( 2 ) 7

(o) If 0 < ( )

, ( ) 7 =

( 1 ) 7 ( 0 ) 7
( 0 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7

7
= 36
we find like in the previous case,
0 < (1 )

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
1+ 7
37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
( 1 ) 7 + 7 ( 2 ) 7
37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
1+ 7
0
36
7
7
7
1
1
0
0
37

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
1+( ) 7
deduce (0 ) 7 7 () (1 ) 7

(n) If 0 < (1 ) 7 < (0 )


(1 ) 7

541

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
( 1 ) 7 +( ) 7 ( 2 ) 7

( )

(1 ) 7
543

, we obtain

37 7 ( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7
( 1 ) 7 + 7 ( 2 ) 7
37
1+ 7

( 1 ) 7 ( 2 ) 7

(0 ) 7

And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have
Definition of 7 :(2 ) 7

(1 ) 7 ,

36
37

In a completely analogous way, we obtain


Definition of 7 :(2 ) 7

(1 ) 7 ,

36
37

Now, using this result and replacing it in CONCATENATED GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result
stated in the theorem.
Particular case :

If (36
) 7 = (37
) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (2 ) 7 and in this case (1 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 if in addition (0 ) 7 = (1 ) 7
7
then = (0 ) 7 and as a consequence 36 () = (0 ) 7 37 () this also defines (0 ) 7 for the special
case .

Analogously if (36
) 7 = (37
) 7 , (1 ) 7 = (2 ) 7 and then
7
7
(1 ) = (1 ) if in addition (0 ) 7 = (1 ) 7 then 36 () = (0 ) 7 37 () This is an important consequence
of the relation between (1 ) 7 and (1 ) 7 , and definition of (0 ) 7 .

14 1 13 [(14
) 1 (14
) 1 ]14 = 0

1
1
15
14 [(15 ) (15 ) 1 ]15 = 0
has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution for the system

www.ijmer.com

544
545
546
2154 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

16 2 17 (16
) 2 + (16
) 2 17 16 = 0

17 2 16 (17
) 2 + (17
) 2 17 17 = 0

18 2 17 (18
) 2 + (18
) 2 17 18 = 0
2

16
17 [(16 ) (16 ) 2 19 ]16 = 0
2

17
16 [(17
) 2 (17
) 2 19 ]17 = 0
2

18
17 [(18 ) (18 ) 2 19 ]18 = 0
has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution for

20 3 21 (20
) 3 + (20
) 3 21 20 = 0

21 3 20 (21
) 3 + (21
) 3 21 21 = 0
3

22
21 (22 ) + (22 ) 3 21 22 = 0

20 3 21 [(20
) 3 (20
) 3 23 ]20 = 0
3

21
20 [(21 ) (21 ) 3 23 ]21 = 0
3

22
21 [(22
) 3 (22
) 3 23 ]22 = 0
has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution

24 4 25 (24
) 4 + (24
) 4 25 24 = 0

547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561

25

24 (25
) 4 + (25
) 4 25 25 = 0

563

26

25 (26
) 4 + (26
) 4 25 26 = 0

564

24

25 [(24
) 4 (24
)4

27

]24 = 0

565

25

24 [(25
) 4 (25
)4

27

]25 = 0

566

26

25 [(26
) 4 (26
)4

27

]26 = 0

567

has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution for the system

568

28

29 (28
) 5 + (28
) 5 29 28 = 0

569

29

28 (29
) 5 + (29
) 5 29 29 = 0

570

30

29 (30
) 5 + (30
) 5 29 30 = 0

571

28

29 [(28
) 5 (28
) 5 31 ]28 = 0

572

29

28 [(29
) 5 (29
) 5 31 ]29 = 0

573

30

29 [(30
) 5 (30
) 5 31 ]30 = 0

574

has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution for the system

575

32

33 (32
) 6 + (32
) 6 33 32 = 0

576

33

32 (33
) 6 + (33
) 6 33 33 = 0

577

34

33 (34
) 6 + (34
) 6 33 34 = 0

578

32

33 [(32
) 6 (32
) 6 35 ]32 = 0

579

33

32 [(33
) 6 (33
) 6 35 ]33 = 0

580

www.ijmer.com

2155 | P a g e

34

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

33 [(34
) 6 (34
) 6 35 ]34 = 0

has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution for the system
36
37
38

36
37
38

7
7

7
7

584
582

37 (36
) 7 + (36
) 7 37 36 = 0

36 (37 ) + (37 ) 7 37 37 = 0

37 (38
) 7 + (38
) 7 37 38 = 0

583
584
585

37 [(36
) 7 (36
) 7 39 ]36 = 0

36 [(37 ) (37 ) 7 39 ]37 = 0

37 [(38
) 7 (38
) 7 39 ]38 = 0

586
587
588
589

has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution for the system
(a) Indeed the first two equations have a nontrivial solution 36 , 37 if
39 =

(36
) 7 (37
) 7 36 7 37

(36 ) 37 (37
) 7 37 = 0

560

+ (36
) 7 (37
) 7 37 + (37
) 7 (36
) 7 37 +

Definition and uniqueness of T37


:-

561

After hypothesis 0 < 0, > 0 and the functions ( ) 7 37 being increasing, it follows that there

exists a unique 37
for which 37
= 0. With this value , we obtain from the three first equations
36 =

36 7 37
) 7 +( ) 7
( 36
36
37

38 =

38 7 37
) 7 +( ) 7
( 38
38
37

(e) By the same argument, the equations( SOLUTIONAL) admit solutions 36 , 37 if

39 = (36
) 7 (37
) 7 36 7 37 7

(36 ) (37 ) 39 + (37


) 7 (36
) 7 39 +(36
) 7 39 (37
) 7 39 = 0
Where in 39 36 , 37 , 38 , 36 , 38 must be replaced by their values from 96. It is easy to see that is a
decreasing function in 37 taking into account the hypothesis 0 > 0 , < 0 it follows that there exists a

unique 37
such that = 0
Finally we obtain the unique solution OF THE SYSTEM

37
given by 39 = 0 , 37
given by 37
= 0 and

36
=

36
=

36 7 37

7
( 36 ) +( 36 ) 7 37

36 7 37
) 7 ( ) 7

(36
39
36

38 7 37

7
( 38 ) +( 38 ) 7 37
7

38
37

38
) 7 ( ) 7

(38
39
38

, 38
=

563

Definition and uniqueness of T21


:After hypothesis 0 < 0, > 0 and the functions ( ) 1 21 being increasing, it follows that there

exists a unique 21
for which 21
= 0. With this value , we obtain from the three first equations

20 =

20 3 21
) 3 +( ) 3
( 20
20
21

22 =

24 4 25

) 4
4
( 24 ) +( 24
25

26 =

28 5 29
) 5 +( ) 5
( 28
28
29

30 =

565
566

26 4 25

) 4
4
( 26 ) +( 26
25

Definition and uniqueness of T29


:After hypothesis 0 < 0, > 0 and the functions ( ) 5 29 being increasing, it follows that there

exists a unique 29
for which 29
= 0. With this value , we obtain from the three first equations

28 =

564

22 3 21
) 3 +( ) 3
( 22
22
21

Definition and uniqueness of T25


:After hypothesis 0 < 0, > 0 and the functions ( ) 4 25 being increasing, it follows that there

exists a unique 25
for which 25
= 0. With this value , we obtain from the three first equations

24 =

562

567

30 5 29
) 5 +( ) 5
( 30
30
29

Definition and uniqueness of T33


:After hypothesis 0 < 0, > 0 and the functions ( ) 6 33 being increasing, it follows that there

exists a unique 33
for which 33
= 0. With this value , we obtain from the three first equations

www.ijmer.com

568

2156 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com
32 =

32 6 33
) 6 +( ) 6
( 32
32
33

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
,

34 =

34 6 33
) 6 +( ) 6
( 34
34
33

(f) By the same argument, the equations 92,93 admit solutions 13 , 14 if

= (13
) 1 (14
) 1 13 1 14 1

(13 ) (14 ) + (14


) 1 (13
) 1 +(13
) 1 (14
)1 =0
Where in 13 , 14 , 15 , 13 , 15 must be replaced by their values from 96. It is easy to see that is a
decreasing function in 14 taking into account the hypothesis 0 > 0 , < 0 it follows that there exists a

unique 14
such that = 0
(g) By the same argument, the equations 92,93 admit solutions 16 , 17 if

19 = (16
) 2 (17
) 2 16 2 17 2

(16
) 2 (17
) 2 19 + (17
) 2 (16
) 2 19 +(16
) 2 19 (17
) 2 19 = 0
Where in 19 16 , 17 , 18 , 16 , 18 must be replaced by their values from 96. It is easy to see that is a
decreasing function in 17 taking into account the hypothesis 0 > 0 , < 0 it follows that there exists a

unique G14
such that 19 = 0
(a) By the same argument, the concatenated equations admit solutions 20 , 21 if

23 = (20
) 3 (21
) 3 20 3 21 3

(20
) 3 (21
) 3 23 + (21
) 3 (20
) 3 23 +(20
) 3 23 (21
) 3 23 = 0
Where in 23 20 , 21 , 22 , 20 , 22 must be replaced by their values from 96. It is easy to see that is a
decreasing function in 21 taking into account the hypothesis 0 > 0 , < 0 it follows that there exists a

unique 21
such that 23 = 0
(b) By the same argument, the equations of modules admit solutions 24 , 25 if

27 = (24
) 4 (25
) 4 24 4 25 4

4
4

(24 ) (25 ) 27 + (25


) 4 (24
) 4 27 +(24
) 4 27 (25
) 4 27 = 0
Where in 27 24 , 25 , 26 , 24 , 26 must be replaced by their values from 96. It is easy to see that is a
decreasing function in 25 taking into account the hypothesis 0 > 0 , < 0 it follows that there exists a

unique 25
such that 27 = 0
(c) By the same argument, the equations (modules) admit solutions 28 , 29 if

31 = (28
) 5 (29
) 5 28 5 29 5

(28 ) (29 ) 31 + (29


) 5 (28
) 5 31 +(28
) 5 31 (29
) 5 31 = 0
Where in 31 28 , 29 , 30 , 28 , 30 must be replaced by their values from 96. It is easy to see that is a
decreasing function in 29 taking into account the hypothesis 0 > 0 , < 0 it follows that there exists a

unique 29
such that 31 = 0
(d) By the same argument, the equations (modules) admit solutions 32 , 33 if

35 = (32
) 6 (33
) 6 32 6 33 6

(32 ) (33 ) 35 + (33


) 6 (32
) 6 35 +(32
) 6 35 (33
) 6 35 = 0
Where in 35 32 , 33 , 34 , 32 , 34 must be replaced by their values It is easy to see that is a decreasing

function in 33 taking into account the hypothesis 0 > 0 , < 0 it follows that there exists a unique 33

such that = 0
Finally we obtain the unique solution of 89 to 94

14
given by = 0 , 14
given by 14
= 0 and

13
=

13
=

13 1 14
) 1 +( ) 1
( 13
13
14

13 1 14

1
(13 ) (13 ) 1

, 15
=

, 15
=

T16
=

a 16 2 G 17

2
(a 16 ) +(a 16 ) 2 T 17
b 16 2 T 17
(b 16 ) 2 (b 16 ) 2 19

15 1 14

1
(15 ) (15 ) 1

a 18 2 G 17

2
(a 18 ) +(a 18 ) 2 T 17
b 18 2 T 17

18
(b 18 ) 2 (b 18 ) 2 19

Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution


Finally we obtain the unique solution

21
given by 23 = 0 , 21
given by 21
= 0 and

20
=

20 3 21
) 3 +( ) 3
( 20
20
21

, 22
=

571

572

573
574

575

578
579
580
581

582

, G18
=

, T

570

15 1 14
) 1 +( ) 1
( 15
14
15

Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution


Finally we obtain the unique solution

G17
given by 19 = 0 , T17
given by T17
= 0 and

G16
=

569

583
584
585
586
587
588

22 3 21
) 3 +( ) 3
( 22
22
21

www.ijmer.com

2157 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

20
=

20 3 21
) 3 ( ) 3
(20
23
20

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

, 22
=

22 3 21
) 3 ( ) 3
(22
23
22

Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution


Finally we obtain the unique solution

25
given by 27 = 0 , 25
given by 25
= 0 and

24
=

24
=

24 4 25
) 4 +( ) 4
( 24
24
25

, 26
=

24 4 25

4
4
(24 ) (24 )
27

589

26 4 25
) 4 +( ) 4
( 26
26
25

, 26
=

26 4 25

4
4
(26 ) (26 )
27

590

Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution


Finally we obtain the unique solution

29
given by 31 = 0 , 29
given by 29
= 0 and

28
=

28
=

28 5 29

5
( 28 ) +( 28 ) 5 29

28 5 29
) 5 ( ) 5

(28
31
28

591

30 5 29

5
( 30 ) +( 30 ) 5 29
5

30
29

30
) 5 ( ) 5

(30
31
30

, 30
=

592

Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution


Finally we obtain the unique solution

33
given by 35 = 0 , 33
given by 33
= 0 and

32
=

32
=

32 6 33
) 6 +( ) 6
( 32
32
33

, 34
=

32 6 33

6
6
(32 ) (32 )
35

593

34 6 33
) 6 +( ) 6
( 34
34
33

, 34
=

34 6 33

6
6
(34 ) (34 )
35

594

Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution


ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY ANALYSIS
Theorem 4: If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( ) 1 ( ) 1
Belong to 1 ( + ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stable.
Proof: Denote
Definition of , : = +
, = +
) 1
( 14

14

14
= 14

( ) 1

15

13

14

15

597
598

= (14
) 1 + 14

14 + 14

13 14

14
14

599

= (15
) 1 + 15

15 + 15

14 15

15
14

600

13

601

14

( ) 14

602

15

( ) 15

603

= (13
) 1 13

13 + 13

14 +

15
=13

13

= (14
) 1 14

14 + 14

13 +

15
=13

= (15
) 1 15

15 + 15

14 +

15
=13

If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions (a ) 2 and (b ) 2
C 2 ( + ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stable
Denote
Definition of , :G = G +
, T = T +
) 2
( 17

T 17

T17

= 17

( ) 2

19

Belong to

dt
d18
dt
d16
dt
d17
dt
d18
dt

604
605
606
607

taking into account equations (global)and neglecting the terms of power 2, we obtain
d16

= (16
) 2 + 16 2 16 + 16 2 17 16 2 G16
17
dt
d17

596

Then taking into account equations (global) and neglecting the terms of power 2, we obtain
13

= (13
) 1 + 13 1 13 + 13 1 14 13 1 13
14

14

595

608
609

= (17
) 2 + 17

17 + 17

16 17

G17
17

610

= (18
) 2 + 18

18 + 18

17 18

G18
17

611

T16

612

17

( ) T17

613

18

( ) T18

614

= (16
) 2 16

16 + 16

17 +

18
=16

16

= (17
) 2 17

17 + 17

16 +

18
=16

= (18
) 2 18

18 + 18

17 +

18
=16

If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( ) 3 ( ) 3
3 ( + ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stabl
Denote
Definition of , :www.ijmer.com

Belong to

615

2158 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
= +
, = +
) 3
( 21

21
= 21

21

( ) 3

23

616
617
618

Then taking into account equations (global) and neglecting the terms of power 2, we obtain
20

= (20
) 3 + 20 3 20 + 20 3 21 20 3 20
21

21

22

20

21

22

= (21
) 3 + 21

21 + 21

20 21

21
21

619

= (22
) 3 + 22

22 + 22

21 22

22
21

6120

20

621

21

( ) 21

622

22

( ) 22

623

= (20
) 3 20

20 + 20

21 +

22
=20

20

= (21
) 3 21

21 + 21

20 +

22
=20

= (22
) 3 22

22 + 22

21 +

22
=20

If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( ) 4 ( )
4 ( + ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stabl
Denote
Definition of , : = +
, = +
) 4
( 25

25

25
= 25

( ) 4

27

Belong to

625

Then taking into account equations (global) and neglecting the terms of power 2, we obtain
24

= (24
) 4 + 24 4 24 + 24 4 25 24 4 24
25

25

26

24

25

26

624

626
627

= (25
) 4 + 25

25 + 25

24 25

25
25

628

= (26
) 4 + 26

26 + 26

25 26

26
25

629

= (24
) 4 24

24 + 24

25 +

26
=24

24

24

630

= (25
) 4 25

25 + 25

24 +

26
=24

25

25

631

= (26
) 4 26

26 + 26

25 +

26
=24

26

( ) 26

632
633

If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( ) 5 ( ) 5
5 ( + ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stable
Denote
Definition of , : = +
, = +
) 5
( 29

29

29
= 29

( ) 5

31

Belong to

634

Then taking into account equations (global) and neglecting the terms of power 2, we obtain
28

= (28
) 5 + 28 5 28 + 28 5 29 28 5 28
29

29

30

28

29

30

= (29
) 5 + 29

29 + 29

28 29

29
29

637

= (30
) 5 + 30

30 + 30

29 30

30
29

638

= (28
) 5 28

28 + 28

29 +

30
=28

28

28

639

= (29
) 5 29

29 + 29

28 +

30
=28

29

29

640

= (30
) 5 30

30 + 30

29 +

30
=28

30

( ) 30

641

If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( ) 6 ( ) 6
6 ( + ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stable
Denote
Definition of , : = +
, = +
) 6
( 33

33

33
= 33

( ) 6

35

34

32

Belong to

642

643

Then taking into account equations(global) and neglecting the terms of power 2, we obtain
32

= (32
) 6 + 32 6 32 + 32 6 33 32 6 32
33

33

635
636

644
645

= (33
) 6 + 33

33 + 33

32 33

33
33

646

= (34
) 6 + 34

34 + 34

33 34

34
33

647

= (32
) 6 32

32 + 32

33 +

34
=32

32

32

www.ijmer.com

648

2159 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

= (33
) 6 33 6 33 + 33 6 32 + 34

33 33
=32

33

34

= (34
) 6 34 6 34 + 34 6 33 + 34
=32 34 ( ) 34
Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution of 79,20,36,22,23,
If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( ) 7 ( ) 7
7 ( + ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stable.

649
650

651
Belong to

Proof: Denote
Definition of , :-

652

= +
) 7
( 37

37

, = +

37
= 37

653

( ) 7

39

Then taking into account equations(SOLUTIONAL) and neglecting the terms of power 2, we obtain
36

37

38

36

37

38

(36
)7

(37
)7

36
37

654
655
656

+ 36

36 + 36

37 36

+ 37

37 + 37

36 37

37
37

657

= (38
) 7 + 38

38 + 38

37 38

38
37

658

= (36
) 7 36

36 + 36

37 +

38
=36

36

36

659

= (37
) 7 37

37 + 37

36 +

38
=36

37

37

660

= (38
) 7 38

38 + 38

37 +

38
=36

38

( ) 38

661

2.
The characteristic equation of this system is

1 + (15
) 1 15 1 { 1 + (15
) 1 + 15
1

+ (13
) 1 + 13

+ (13
) 1 13
1

1
1

14

+ (14
) 1 + 14

14
+ 14

, 14

13

+ (13
) 1 + (14
) 1 + 13

+ (13
) 1 + (14
) 1 13

14
+ 14

+ (13
) 1 13

14

14

1
1

1
1

+ (13
) 1 + (14
) 1 + 13

+ (13
) 1 + 13 1
15
1

1
1
+ (13 ) 13
14 , 15

14

13

14

14
+ 14

14
1

+ 14

13

14

13

, 13

+ 14
1

13

14

+ 14

13
, 14

+ 14
1

13

13
+ 13

14
+ 14

, 13

662

15
15

15

13

13

G16

13
}=0

, 15

+
2

+ (18
) 2 18
2

{
2

+ 16

+ (16
) 2 16

(16
)2

+ (16
) 2 16
2

+ (18
) 2 + 18

17
17

+ (17
) 2 + 17

17

, 17

16
, 16

G17

T17
+ 17

+ (16
) 2 + (17
) 2 + 16

+ (16
) 2 + (17
) 2 16

+ (16
) 2 + (17
) 2 + 16

(16
)2

+ 16

18

17

G16

T17

17

16
2

+ 17

G17

, 16

T16

G17

+ 17
2

16
, 17

+ 17
2

16

G16
+ 16

+ 17

T17
+ 17
2

2
2

+ 17

www.ijmer.com

18
18

G18

16

2160 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

+ (16
) 2 16 2 17 , 18 T17
+ 17 2 16 , 18 T16
}=0

+
3

+ (22
) 3 22
3

+ (20
) 3 20
3

21
3

21
+ 21

, 21

20

21

21
+ 21

+ (20
) 3 + (21
) 3 20

3
3

21

21

21

20

, 20

21
+ 21

21
3

20
3

+ 21

20

21

+ 21
3

20

, 21

+ 21

20

+ 21
3

20

20
+ 20

+ (20
) 3 + (21
) 3 + 20

+ (20
) 3 + 20 3
22
3

3
3
+ (20 ) 20
21 , 22

21
+ 21

, 20

+ (20
) 3 + (21
) 3 + 20

+ (22
) 3 + 22

21

+ (21
) 3 + 21

3
3

+ (20
) 3 20

+ (20
) 3 + 20

22
22

22

20

20

24

28

32

20
}=0

, 22

+
4

+ (26
) 4 26
4

+ (24
) 4 24
4

25

25

25
+ 25

25
+ 25

, 25

24

+ (24
) 4 24

25

, 24

24

25

24
+ 24

25

25
+ 25

24

, 24

+ (24
) 4 + (25
) 4 + 24

+ (24
) 4 + 24 4
26
4

+ (24
) 4 24 4 25 , 26

24
, 25

+ (24
) 4 + (25
) 4 24

24

+ (24
) 4 + (25
) 4 + 24

+ (26
) 4 + 26

+ (25
) 4 + 25

+ (24
) 4 + 24

+ 25
4
4

25

25
+ 25

25
4

+ 25

+ 25

24

24

+ 25

25

26
26

26

24

24
}=0

, 26

+
5

+ (30
) 5 30
5

+ (28
) 5 28
5

+ (30
) 5 + 30
5

29

29

29
+ 29

29
+ 29

, 29

+ (29
) 5 + 29

28

+ (28
) 5 28

29

, 28

28
+ 28

29

29
+ 29

28

, 28

+ (28
) 5 + (29
) 5 28

+ (28
) 5 + (29
) 5 + 28

+ (28
) 5 + 28 5
30
5

5
5
+ (28 ) 28
29 , 30

28

29

28
, 29

+ (28
) 5 + (29
) 5 + 28

28

+ (28
) 5 + 28

+ 29
5
5

29

29
+ 29

29
5

+ 29

+ 29

28

28

+ 29

29

30
30

30

28

28
}=0

, 30

+
6

+ (34
) 6 34
6

+ (32
) 6 32
6

+ (32
) 6 + 32

6
6

+ (34
) 6 + 34

33
33

33
+ 33

33
+ 33

, 33

+ (33
) 6 + 33

32

+ (32
) 6 32

33

, 32

33

32
+ 32

33

33
+ 33

32

, 32

+ (32
) 6 + (33
) 6 32

+ (32
) 6 + (33
) 6 + 32

(32
)6

+ 32

34

32

, 33

+ (32
) 6 + (33
) 6 + 32

32

32

+ 33
6
6

33

+ 33
6

33

32

+ 33

33

6
6

+ 33

www.ijmer.com

34
34

34

32

2161 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

+ (32
) 6 32 6 33 , 34 33
+ 33 6 32 , 34 32
}=0

+
7

+ (38
) 7 38
7

+ (36
) 7 36
7

7
7

+ (38
) 7 + 38

37
37

37
+ 37

37
+ 37

, 37

+ (37
) 7 + 37

36

+ (36
) 7 36

37

, 36

36
+ 36

37

37
+ 37

36

, 36

+ (36
) 7 + (37
) 7 36

+ (36
) 7 + (37
) 7 + 36

+ (36
) 7 + 36 7
38
7

7
7
+ (36 ) 36
37 , 38

36

37

+ (36
) 7 + (37
) 7 + 36

36
, 37

36

+ (36
) 7 + 36

+ 37
7
7

37

+ 37
7

37
+ 37

37
7

+ 37

36

36

+ 37

37

, 38

38
38

38

36

36

36
}=0

REFERENCES
================================================================
============
(1) A HAIMOVICI: On the growth of a two species ecological system divided on age groups. Tensor, Vol
37 (1982),Commemoration volume dedicated to Professor Akitsugu Kawaguchi on his 80 th birthday
(2)FRTJOF CAPRA: The web of life Flamingo, Harper Collins See "Dissipative structures pages 172188
(3)HEYLIGHEN F. (2001): "The Science of Self-organization and Adaptivity", in L. D. Kiel, (ed) .
Knowledge
Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity, in: The
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems ((EOLSS), (Eolss Publishers, Oxford) [http://www.eolss.net
(4)MATSUI, T, H. Masunaga, S. M. Kreidenweis, R. A. Pielke Sr., W.-K. Tao, M. Chin, and Y. J
Kaufman (2006), Satellite-based assessment of marine low cloud variability associated with
aerosol,
atmospheric
stability,
and
the
diurnal
cycle, J.
Geophys.
Res., 111,
D17204,
doi:10.1029/2005JD006097
(5)STEVENS, B, G. Feingold, W.R. Cotton and R.L. Walko, Elements of the microphysical structure of
numerically simulated nonprecipitating stratocumulus J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 980-1006
(6)FEINGOLD, G, Koren, I; Wang, HL; Xue, HW; Brewer, WA (2010), Precipitation-generated
oscillations in open cellular cloud fields Nature, 466 (7308) 849-852, doi: 10.1038/nature09314,
Published 12-Aug 2010
(7)HEYLIGHEN F. (2001): "The Science of Self-organization and Adaptivity", in L. D. Kiel, (ed) .
Knowledge
Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity, in: The
Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems ((EOLSS), (Eolss Publishers, Oxford) [http://www.eolss.net
(8)MATSUI, T, H. Masunaga, S. M. Kreidenweis, R. A. Pielke Sr., W.-K. Tao, M. Chin, and Y. J
Kaufman (2006), Satellite-based assessment of marine low cloud variability associated with
aerosol,
atmospheric
stability,
and
the
diurnal
cycle, J.
Geophys.
Res., 111,
D17204,
doi:10.1029/2005JD006097
(8A)STEVENS, B, G. Feingold, W.R. Cotton and R.L. Walko, Elements of the microphysical structure of
numerically simulated nonprecipitating stratocumulus J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 980-1006
(8B)FEINGOLD, G, Koren, I; Wang, HL; Xue, HW; Brewer, WA (2010), Precipitation-generated
oscillations in open cellular cloud fields Nature, 466 (7308) 849-852, doi: 10.1038/nature09314, Published
12-Aug 2010

www.ijmer.com

2162 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

(9)^ a b c Einstein, A. (1905), "Ist die Trgheit eines Krpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhngig?", Annalen der
Physik 18: 639 Bibcode 1905AnP...323..639E,DOI:10.1002/andp.19053231314. See also the English translation.
(10)^ a b Paul Allen Tipler, Ralph A. Llewellyn (2003-01), Modern Physics, W. H. Freeman and Company,
pp. 8788, ISBN 0-7167-4345-0
(11)^ a b Rainville, S. et al. World Year of Physics: A direct test of E=mc2. Nature 438, 1096-1097 (22
December 2005) | doi: 10.1038/4381096a; Published online 21 December 2005.
(12)^ In F. Fernflores. The Equivalence of Mass and Energy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
(13)^ Note that the relativistic mass, in contrast to the rest mass m0, is not a relativistic invariant, and that the
velocity is not a Minkowski four-vector, in contrast to the quantity , where is the differential of the proper time.
However, the energy-momentum four-vector is a genuine Minkowski four-vector, and the intrinsic origin of the
square-root in the definition of the relativistic mass is the distinction between d and dt.
(14)^ Relativity DeMystified, D. McMahon, Mc Graw Hill (USA), 2006, ISBN 0-07-145545-0
(15)^ Dynamics and Relativity, J.R. Forshaw, A.G. Smith, Wiley, 2009, ISBN 978-0-470-01460-8
(16)^ Hans, H. S.; Puri, S. P. (2003). Mechanics (2 ed.). Tata McGraw-Hill. p. 433. ISBN 0-07-0473609., Chapter 12 page 433
(17)^ E. F. Taylor and J. A. Wheeler, Spacetime Physics, W.H. Freeman and Co., NY. 1992.ISBN 0-71672327-1, see pp. 248-9 for discussion of mass remaining constant after detonation of nuclear bombs, until heat is
allowed to escape.
(18)^ Mould, Richard A. (2002). Basic relativity (2 ed.). Springer. p. 126. ISBN 0-387-95210-1., Chapter 5 page
126
(19)^ Chow, Tail L. (2006). Introduction to electromagnetic theory: a modern perspective. Jones & Bartlett
Learning. p. 392. ISBN 0-7637-3827-1., Chapter 10 page 392
(20)^ [2] Cockcroft-Walton experiment
(21)^ a b c Conversions used: 1956 International (Steam) Table (IT) values where one calorie 4.1868 J and one
BTU 1055.05585262 J. Weapons designers' conversion value of one gram TNT 1000 calories used.
(22)^ Assuming the dam is generating at its peak capacity of 6,809 MW.
(23)^ Assuming a 90/10 alloy of Pt/Ir by weight, a Cp of 25.9 for Pt and 25.1 for Ir, a Pt-dominated average Cp of
25.8, 5.134 moles of metal, and 132 J.K-1 for the prototype. A variation of 1.5 picograms is of course, much
smaller than the actual uncertainty in the mass of the international prototype, which are 2 micrograms.
(24)^ [3] Article on Earth rotation energy. Divided by c^2.
(25)^ a b Earth's gravitational self-energy is 4.6 10-10 that of Earth's total mass, or 2.7 trillion metric tons.
Citation: The Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-Ranging Operation (APOLLO), T. W. Murphy, Jr. et
al. University of Washington, Dept. of Physics (132 kB PDF, here.).
(26)^ There is usually more than one possible way to define a field energy, because any field can be made to
couple to gravity in many different ways. By general scaling arguments, the correct answer at everyday
distances, which are long compared to the quantum gravity scale, should be minimal coupling, which means that
no powers of the curvature tensor appear. Any non-minimal couplings, along with other higher order terms, are
presumably only determined by a theory of quantum gravity, and within string theory, they only start to
contribute to experiments at the string scale.
www.ijmer.com

2163 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

(27)^ G. 't Hooft, "Computation of the quantum effects due to a four-dimensional pseudoparticle", Physical
Review D14:34323450 (1976).
(28)^ A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A. Schwarz, Yu. Tyupkin, "Pseudoparticle Solutions to Yang Mills
Equations", Physics Letters 59B:85 (1975).
(29)^ F. Klinkhammer, N. Manton, "A Saddle Point Solution in the Weinberg Salam Theory", Physical Review
D 30:2212.
(30)^ Rubakov V. A. "Monopole Catalysis of Proton Decay", Reports on Progress in Physics 51:189241
(1988).
(31)^ S.W. Hawking "Black Holes Explosions?" Nature 248:30 (1974).
(32)^ Einstein, A. (1905), "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Krper." (PDF), Annalen der Physik 17: 891
921, Bibcode 1905AnP...322...891E,DOI:10.1002/andp.19053221004. English translation.

(33)^ See e.g. Lev B.Okun, The concept of Mass, Physics


36, http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-42/iss-6/vol42no6p31_36.pdf

Today 42 (6),

June

1969,

p.

31

(34)^ Max Jammer (1999), Concepts of mass in contemporary physics and philosophy, Princeton University
Press, p. 51, ISBN 0-691-01017-X
(35)^ Eriksen, Erik; Vyenli, Kjell (1976), "The classical and relativistic concepts of mass",Foundations of
Physics (Springer) 6: 115124, Bibcode 1976FoPh....6..115E,DOI:10.1007/BF00708670
(36)^ a b Jannsen, M., Mecklenburg, M. (2007), From classical to relativistic mechanics: Electromagnetic
models of the electron., in V. F. Hendricks, et al., , Interactions: Mathematics, Physics and
Philosophy (Dordrecht: Springer): 65134
(37)^ a b Whittaker, E.T. (19511953), 2. Edition: A History of the theories of aether and electricity, vol. 1: The
classical theories / vol. 2: The modern theories 19001926, London: Nelson
(38)^ Miller, Arthur I. (1981), Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity. Emergence (1905) and early
interpretation (19051911), Reading: AddisonWesley, ISBN 0-201-04679-2
(39)^ a b Darrigol, O. (2005), "The Genesis of the theory of relativity." (PDF), Sminaire Poincar 1: 122
(40)^ Philip Ball (Aug 23, 2011). "Did Einstein discover E = mc2? Physics World.
(41)^ Ives, Herbert E. (1952), "Derivation of the mass-energy relation", Journal of the Optical Society of
America 42 (8): 540543, DOI:10.1364/JOSA.42.000540
(42)^ Jammer, Max (1961/1997). Concepts of Mass in Classical and Modern Physics. New York:
Dover. ISBN 0-486-29998-8.
(43)^ Stachel, John; Torretti, Roberto (1982), "Einstein's first derivation of mass-energy equivalence", American
Journal of Physics 50 (8): 760763, Bibcode1982AmJPh..50..760S, DOI:10.1119/1.12764
(44)^ Ohanian, Hans (2008), "Did Einstein prove E=mc2?", Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part
B 40 (2): 167173, arXiv:0805.1400,DOI:10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.03.002
(45)^ Hecht, Eugene (2011), "How Einstein confirmed E0=mc2", American Journal of Physics 79 (6): 591
600, Bibcode 2011AmJPh..79..591H, DOI:10.1119/1.3549223
(46)^ Rohrlich, Fritz (1990), "An elementary derivation of E=mc2", American Journal of Physics 58 (4): 348
www.ijmer.com

2164 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
349, Bibcode 1990AmJPh..58..348R, DOI:10.1119/1.16168
(47) (1996). Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics. California Studies in the History of Science. 13. Berkeley:
University of California Press. pp. 236237. ISBN 0-520-20860-

(48)^ UIBK.ac.at
(49)^ J. J. L. Morton; et al. (2008). "Solid-state quantum memory using the 31P nuclear spin". Nature 455 (7216):
10851088. Bibcode 2008Natur.455.1085M.DOI:10.1038/nature07295.
(50)^ S. Weisner (1983). "Conjugate coding". Association of Computing Machinery, Special Interest Group in
Algorithms and Computation Theory 15: 7888.
(51)^ A. Zelinger, Dance of the Photons: From Einstein to Quantum Teleportation, Farrar, Straus & Giroux,
New York, 2010, pp. 189, 192, ISBN 0374239665
(52)^ B.
Schumacher (1995).
"Quantum
coding". Physical
2747. Bibcode 1995PhRvA..51.2738S. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.51.2738.

Review

A 51 (4):

2738

(53)Delamotte, Bertrand; A hint of renormalization, American Journal of Physics 72 (2004) pp. 170184.
Beautiful elementary introduction to the ideas, no prior knowledge of field theory being necessary. Full text
available at: hep-th/0212049
(54)Baez, John; Renormalization Made Easy, (2005). A qualitative introduction to the subject.
(55)Blechman, Andrew E. ; Renormalization: Our Greatly Misunderstood Friend, (2002). Summary of a lecture;
has more information about specific regularization and divergence-subtraction schemes.
(56)Cao, Tian Yu & Schweber, Silvian S. ; The Conceptual Foundations and the Philosophical Aspects of
Renormalization Theory, Synthese, 97(1) (1993), 33108.
(57)Shirkov, Dmitry; Fifty Years of the Renormalization Group, C.E.R.N. Courrier 41(7) (2001). Full text
available at: I.O.P Magazines.
(58)E. Elizalde; Zeta regularization techniques with Applications.

(59)N. N. Bogoliubov, D. V. Shirkov (1959): The Theory of Quantized Fields. New York, Interscience. The first
text-book on the renormalization group theory.
(60)Ryder, Lewis H. ; Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, 1985), ISBN 0-521-33859-X Highly
readable textbook, certainly the best introduction to relativistic Q.F.T. for particle physics.
(61)Zee, Anthony; Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell, Princeton University Press (2003) ISBN 0-691-01019-6.
Another excellent textbook on Q.F.T.
(62)Weinberg, Steven; The Quantum Theory of Fields (3 volumes) Cambridge University Press (1995). A
monumental treatise on Q.F.T. written by a leading expert, Nobel laureate 1979.
(63)Pokorski, Stefan; Gauge Field Theories, Cambridge University Press (1987) ISBN 0-521-47816-2.
(64)'t Hooft, Gerard; The Glorious Days of Physics Renormalization of Gauge theories, lecture given at Erice
(August/September 1998) by the Nobel laureate 1999 . Full text available at: hep-th/9812203.
(65)Rivasseau, Vincent; An introduction to renormalization, Poincar Seminar (Paris, Oct. 12, 2002), published
in: Duplantier, Bertrand; Rivasseau, Vincent (Eds.) ; Poincar Seminar 2002, Progress in Mathematical Physics
www.ijmer.com

2165 | P a g e

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


www.ijmer.com
Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645
30, Birkhuser (2003) ISBN 3-7643-0579-7. Full text available in PostScript.
(66) Rivasseau, Vincent; From perturbative to constructive renormalization, Princeton University Press
(1991) ISBN 0-691-08530-7. Full text available in PostScript.
(67) H.P. Nilles, Phys. Rep. 110, 1 (1984);
(68) H.E. Haber and G.L. Kane, Phys. Rep. 117, 75 (1985);
(69) R. Barbieri, Riv. Nuov. Cim. 11, 1 (1988).
(70) J.F. Gunion and H.E. Haber, Nucl. Phys. B272, 1 (1986); B402, 567(E) (1993).
(71) A. Sirlin, Nucl. Phys. B71, 29 (1974); Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 573 (1978);
(72)W.J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Nucl. Phys. B93, 303 (1975).
(73)A. Denner and T. Sack, Nucl. Phys. B347, 203 (1990).
(74) B.A. Kniehl and A. Pilaftsis, Nucl. Phys. B474, 286 (1996).
(75) J. Guasch, J. Sol`a, and W. Hollik, Phys. Lett. B 437, 88 (1998);
(76) H. Eberl, S. Kraml, and W. Majerotto, JHEP 9905, 016 (1999);
(77) J. Guasch, W. Hollik, and J. Sol`a, Phys. Lett. B 510, 211 (2001).
[78] P. Gambino, P.A. Grassi, and F. Madricardo, Phys. Lett. B 454, 98 (1999).
(79) B.A. Kniehl, F. Madricardo, and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. D 62, 073010 (2000).
(80) A. Barroso, L. Brucher, and R. Santos, Phys. Rev. D 62, 096003 (2000).
(81) N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 531 (1963);
(82)M. Kobayashi and M. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
(83) J.M. Cornwall, in Proceedings of the French-American Seminar on Theoretical Aspects of Quantum
Chromodynamics, Marseille, France, 1981, edited by J.W. Dash
(Centre de Physique Theorique, Marseille, 1982);
(84)J.M. Cornwall, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1453 (1982);
(85)J.M. Cornwall and J. Papavassiliou, Phys. Rev. D 40, 3474 (1989).
======================================================================

Acknowledgments:
The introduction is a collection of information from various articles, Books, News Paper reports, Home
Pages Of authors, Journal Reviews, Nature s L:etters,Article Abstracts, Research papers, Abstracts Of
Research Papers, Stanford Encyclopedia, Web Pages, Ask a Physicist Column, Deliberations with
Professors, the internet including Wikipedia. We acknowledge all authors who have contributed to the
same. In the eventuality of the fact that there has been any act of omission on the part of the authors, we
regret with great deal of compunction, contrition, regret, trepidation and remorse. As Newton said, it is
only because erudite and eminent people allowed one to piggy ride on their backs; probably an attempt
has been made to look slightly further. Once again, it is stated that the references are only illustrative and
not comprehensive
First Author: 1Mr. K. N.Prasanna Kumar has three doctorates one each in Mathematics, Economics, Political Science.
Thesis was based on Mathematical Modeling. He was recently awarded D.litt. for his work on Mathematical Models in
Political Science--- Department of studies in Mathematics, Kuvempu University, Shimoga, Karnataka, India Corresponding
Author:drknpkumar@gmail.com
Second Author: 2Prof. B.S Kiranagi is the Former Chairman of the Department of Studies in Mathematics, Manasa
Gangotri and present Professor Emeritus of UGC in the Department. Professor Kiranagi has guided over 25 students and he
has received many encomiums and laurels for his contribution to Co homology Groups and Mathematical Sciences. Known
for his prolific writing, and one of the senior most Professors of the country, he has over 150 publications to his credit. A
prolific writer and a prodigious thinker, he has to his credit several books on Lie Groups, Co Homology Groups, and other
mathematical application topics, and excellent publication history.-- UGC Emeritus Professor (Department of studies in
Mathematics), Manasagangotri, University of Mysore, Karnataka, India
Third Author: 3Prof. C.S. Bagewadi is the present Chairman of Department of Mathematics and Department of Studies in
Computer Science and has guided over 25 students. He has published articles in both national and international journals.
Professor Bagewadi specializes in Differential Geometry and its wide-ranging ramifications. He has to his credit more than
159 research papers. Several Books on Differential Geometry, Differential Equations are coauthored by him--- Chairman,
Department of studies in Mathematics and Computer science, Jnanasahyadri Kuvempu University, Shankarghatta, Shimoga
district, Karnataka, India
==============================================================================

www.ijmer.com

2166 | P a g e

www.ijmer.com

International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)


Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-2110-2167
ISSN: 2249-6645

www.ijmer.com

2167 | P a g e

Você também pode gostar