UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

USCA Case #12-5198

Document #1394518

FOR DISTRICTPage 1 of 2 OF COWMBIA CIRCUIT Filed: 09/12/2012

v.

STATEMENT OF ISSUES TO BE RAISED

FILED!

SEP 12 2012

1.

Whether it was error for the District Court to act as the final arbiter of all questions of fact and law raised by the parties. Whether it was error for the District Court invoke a "standing" argument to premise dismissal of the Complaint. Whether it was error for the District Court to hold that Sibley did not have such "standing" both under common law and/or statutory grounds. Whether it was error for the District Court to refuse to issue a Quo Warranto Writ to challenge Barack Hussein Obama, II's eligibility.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Whether it was error for the District Court to refuse to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the lJ.S. Attorney and the Attorney General to decide whether to bring or not bring a quo warranto action. Whether it was error for the District Court to hold that the Executive Branch can repeal18 U.S.C. 3332 by fiat. Whether it was error for the District Court to hold that 18 U.S.C.1504 and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 6, did not violate Sibley's First and Fifth A1nend1nent Rights

6.

7.

8.

Fr

ie n

ds

Whether it was error for the District Court to hold that Sibley did not state a cause of action against the lJnited States Marshals Service and Deputy Marshal John Doe#l and Deputy Marshal John Doe#2. Whether it was error for the District Court to refuse oral argument to Sibley.

9.

10.

Whether it was error for the l)istrict Court to refuse to inform the Grand Jury of the "alleged offenses" of l3arack I-Iussein Obama, II contained in Sibley's First A1nended Certified Petition for Writs Quo Warranto
3

of

Th eF og bo w. co m

The issues to be raised in this appeal are:

CLERl-<

USCA Case #12-5198

Document #1394518

Filed: 09/12/2012

Page 2 of 2

11.

Whether it was error for the District Court to deny Sibley's motion to disqualify the Honorable John D Bates.

12.

Whether it was error for the District Court to deny to Sibley the right to directly communicate by writing to each sitting Grand Juror a communication regarding the 211leged Wire Fraud of Barack Hussein Obama, II and other cri1ninal acts of federal actors in the District of Columbia- including without li1nitation members of the U.S. District Court for the District of Colu1nbia and the office of the U.S. Attorney for the District ofColu1nbia- \vhich might warrant further investigation to the end of the Grand Jury issuing either an "indictment" or "presentment". Whether it was error for the IJistrict Court to deny to Sibley pre-service discovery to establish the identi tics of Defendant Deputy Marshal John Doe# I and Defendant Deputy f\1arshal John Doc#2.

13.

VI.

TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT

Attached hereto is a transcript status report.

Attached hereto is a copy of the underlying decision.

Fr

ie n
4

ds

of

VII. UNDERLYING DECISION FROM WHICH APPEAL ARISES

Th eF og bo w. co m

and Mandamus and Co1nplaint for Declaratory Relief and Damages as required by 18 U.S.C. 3332(a), 18 U.S.C. 4 and the Code ofConduct for the United States Judges.