References Alibali, M. W. & Kita, S. (under review).

On the role of gesture in thinking and speaking: Prohibiting gesture alters childrens problem explanations. Alibali, M. W. & Nathan, M. J. (2007a). Teachers gestures as a means of scaffolding students understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video Research in the Learning Sciences (pp. 349-365). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Alibali, M. W. & Nathan, M. J. (2007b, April). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: A view from students and teachers gestures. In R. Nemirovsky and R. Hall (Co-chairs), Mathematics learning and embodied cognition. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois. Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513-562. Barsalou, L. (in press). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-41. Carpenter, T.P., & Moser, J.M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 179202. Christensen, P. (2003). Place, space and knowledge: Children in the village and the city. In P. Christensen & M. OBrien (Eds.), Children in the city: Home, neighbourhood and community (pp. 13-28). London: RoutledgeFalmer. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in education research. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 9-13. De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1987). The effect of semantic structure on first graders strategies for solving addition and subtraction word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18 (5), 363-381. English, L. (2002). Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Enyedy, N. & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). They dont show nothing I didnt know: Emergent tensions between culturally relevant pedagogy and mathematics pedagogy. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 139-174. Farne, A., & Ladavas, E. (2002). Auditory Peripersonal Space in Humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(7), 1030 - 1043. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Edelson, D. E. (2007). Environmental science for all? Considering environmental science for inclusion in the high school core curriculum. Science Education, 16(1), 42-56. Gallese, V. & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brains concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22,(3/4), 455-479.

Gentner, D. & Grudin, J. (1985). The evolution of mental metaphors in psychology: A 90-year retrospective. American Psychologist, 40, 181192. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Houghton Mifflin. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-19. Glenberg, A. M., (in press). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young childrens reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3). Glenberg, A. M., Jaworski, B. K., Rischal, M., & Levin, J. R. (2006). What brains are for: Action, meaning, and reading comprehension. In D. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633. Hall, R. (2001). Schedules of practical work for the analysis of case studies of learning and development. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 203-222. Special issue on Methodologies for capturinig learner practices occuring as part of dynamic learning environments, S. Barab and D. Kirshner (Eds.). Hall, R. (2007, July). Strategies for video recording: Fast, cheap, and (mostly) in control. In S. Derry (Ed.), Guidelines for Video Research in Education: Recommendations from an Expert Panel (pp. 4-14). NSF White Paper, available from Data Research and Development Center (http://drdc.uchicago.edu/what/video-research-guidelines.pdf). Hall, R. & Leander, K. (2007). Children's learning across space-time paths. Working paper, Department of Teaching and Learning, Vanderbilt University. Hall, R., Wieckert, K. & Wright, K. (2008). How does cognition get distributed? Case studies of making concepts general in technical and scientific work. In M. Banich & D. Caccamise (Eds.) Generalization of knowledge: Multidisciplinary perspectives. New York: Psychology Press. Hall, R., Wright, K. & Wieckert, K. (2007). Interactive and historical processes of distributing statistical concepts through work organization. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1&2), 103-127. Hostetter, A. B. & Alibali, M. W. (in press). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Kastens, K. A. & Liben, L. S. (2007). Eliciting self-explanations improves childrens performance on a field-based map skills task. Cognition & Instruction, 25(1), 45-74. Kastens, K.A., Turrin, M., (2006), To What Extent Should Human/Environment Interactions Be Included in Science Education?, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 54, p. 422-436 Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92 (1), 109-129. Ldavas, E. (2002). Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(1), 17-22. Ldavas, E., Di Pellegrino, G., Farne, A., & Zeloni, G. (1998). Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 10, 581-589.

Ladson-Billings, G (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Education Research Journal, 35, 465-491. Lakoff, G. & Nunez, R. E. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. Basic Books. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. Leander, K. M. (in press). Toward a connective ethnography of online/offline literacy networks. In D. Leu, J. Cairo, M. Knobel, & C. Lankshear (Eds.). Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Leander, K. M., & McKim, K. (2003). Tracing the everyday "sitings" of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication, & Information, 3, 211-240. Leary, D. E. (1994). Metaphors in the history of psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Lehrer, R., Jacobson, C., Kemeny, V., & Strom, D. (1999). Building on children's intuitions to develop mathematical understanding of space. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 63-87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Levine, P. & Scollon, R. (2004). Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Liben, L.S. (2001). Thinking through maps. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 45-77). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Liben, L. S., Kastens, K. A., & Stevenson, L. M. (2002). Real world knowledge through realworld maps: A developmental guide for navigating the educational terrain. Developmental Review, 22, 267322. Maravita, A., & Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body (schema). Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(2), 79-86. Miller, H. (2007). Place-based versus people-based geographic information science. Geography Compass, 1/3, 503-535. Moses, R. & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to The Algebra Project. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Nathan, M. J. & Alibali, M. W. (2007, June). Giving a hand to the mind: Gesture enables intersubjectivity in classrooms. In M. W. Alibali & M. J. Nathan (Co-chairs), Mechanisms by which gestures contribute to establishing common ground: Evidence from teaching and learning. Symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the International Society for Gesture Studies, Evanston, Illinois. Nathan, M. J., Eilam, B. & Kim, Suyeon (2007). To disagree, we must also agree: How intersubjectivity structures and perpetuates discourse in a mathematics classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 525-565. National Research Council Committee on Support for Thinking Spatially. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Nemirovsky, R. (1994). On Ways of Symbolizing: The Case of Laura and Velocity Sign. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13, 389-422. Nemirovsky, R. (1996). Mathematical Narratives. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 197-223). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Nemirovsky, R. (2005). Mathematical Places. In R. Nemirovsky , B. Warren, A. Rosebery & J. Solomon (Eds.), Everyday Matters in Science and Mathematics (pp. 45-94). Mahwah: Erlbaum. Nemirovsky , R., Barros, A., Noble, T., Schnepp, M., & Solomon, J. (2005). Learning mathematics in high school: Symbolic places and family resemblances. In T. A. Romberg & T. P. Carpenter (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 185-206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Nemirovsky, R., & Monk, S. (2000). "If you look at it the other way...:" An exploration into the nature of symbolizing. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 177-221). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Nemirovsky, R., & Noble, T. (1997). Mathematical visualization and the place where we live. Educational Studies of Mathematics, 33(2), 99-131. Nemirovsky, R., Tierney, C., & Wright, T. (1998). Body Motion and Graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 119-172. Nemirovsky, R., & Tinker, R. (1993). Exploring chaos: A case study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 12, 47-57. Noble, T., DiMattia, C., Nemirovsky , R., & Barros, A. (2006). Making A Circle: Tools, Representations, and the Spaces Where We Live. Cognition and Instruction, 24(4), 387437. Noble, T., Nemirovsky , R., Cara, D., & Wright, T. (2004). On learning to see. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(2), 109-167. Noble, T., Nemirovsky, R., Wright, T., & Tierney, C. (2001). Experiencing Change: the Mathematics of Change in Multiple Environments. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(1), 85-108. Ochs, E., Jacoby, S., & Gonzales, P. (1994). Interpretive journeys: How physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations, 1, 151-171. Rasmussen, C., Nemirovsky, R., Olszewski, J., Dost, K., & Johnson, J. (2004). On forms of knowing: The role of bodily activity and tools in mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(3), [videopaper] Rosebery, A. Warren, B., Ballenger, C. and Ogonowski, M. (2005) The generative potential of students' everyday knowledge in learning science. In T. Romberg, T. Carpenter and F. Dremock (Eds.) Understanding mathematics and science matters. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Sacks, O., & Wasserman, R. (1987). The case of the colorblind painter. The New York Review of Books, 34, 25-33. Schofield, J. W., & Evans-Rhodes, D. (1989). The impact of a computer based tutor on teachers and students. In D. Bierman, J. Breuker, & J. Sandberg (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Education: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Al and Education. Springfield, VA: IOS. Sowell, E. (1989). Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 498-505.

Stevens, R. & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience, Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning, pp. 107-149. M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk, (Eds.), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Thelen, E. & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Tomasello, M. & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality Developmental Science 10(1), pp 121125. Vaishnavi, S., Calhoun, J., & Chatterjee, A. (2001). Binding personal and peripersonal space: Evidence from tactile extinction. Journal of cognitive science, 13(2), 181-189. Valenzeno, L., Alibali, M. W., & Klatzky, R. L. (2003). Teachers gestures facilitate students learning: A lesson in symmetry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 187-204. Zeki, S. (1993). A vision for the brain. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Zwaan, R. A.& Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1-11.