The original document at http://freeassemblage.blogspot.

com contains live links to

references.

>Listen to the language of [Socialist International],

and realize that Obama uses the same cloaked messages.<

I subscribe to Act! For America's email newsletter. "I founded ACT! for America,"
writes Brigitte Gabriel, "because Islamic militants have declared war on America.
I know what this means. For years, I witnessed first-hand how brutally jihadists
treat non-Muslims.

"We are in for the fight of our lives and we must ACT! - before it's too late."

Gabriel grew up in Lebanon--when it was a mostly Arab Christian nation, and she
watched as the Islamicists took over and the Christians fled, though a few do
still remain behind in their native land.

Gabriel is not the only author and/or activist writing and working against, not
Islam, nor the Muslim people, but against Islamicism, the insidious fascism in the
mindset and the world-view of a comparatively few Muslims who do not recognize
human rights. They recognize only the inherent slavery of Muslims to Allah.

In the blog Death By 1000 Papercuts (DBKP), authors "LBG and pat" write: "Once
again we find where the most innocent of innocents, children, are being victimized
and exploited by those who protest the Israeli siege of Gaza.

"Now we find that children are being exploited by Palestinian supporters in

Europe.
During a pro-Palestinian rally in Brussels, children were rounded up in groups
then forced to read slogans they clearly did not understand.

"Children were forced to carry banners and placards with messages of hate, while
others were forced to wave flags of the terrorist organization of Hezbollah.
Children were allowed to set fire to an Israeli flag then watched as adults
stamped on it chanting “Allahu Akhbar”.

"The most shocking exploitation of the children: at the end of the

“demonstration”, the children were forced to lie on the ground in a “die-in”
symbolizing the children who had perished in Gaza. Yet how many children have died
as the result of being used as “human shields”?"

Act!'s recent newspage contained a link to the blog "Atlas Shrugs", in which
Pamela Geller writes: "Of all the clergy in America ..... why her? Obama invites
Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood linked ISNA [Islamic Society of North America] to
offer prayer at inauguration. ISNA was an unindicted co-conspirator in the same
Hamas funding case that named CAIR [Council on American-Islamic Relations] as a
Muslim Brotherhood group - in the same Brotherhood document that speaks of its
goal of destroying Western civilization from within."

Who is this female clergy? "Ingrid Mattson, the first woman president of the
Islamic Society of North America," at the National Cathedral, no less. This means
she will be speaking to all the members of Congress, all the former Presidents,
all of the Supreme Court Justices, anyone who is anyone in Washington, and to the
entire world because these events are broadcast so we Americans--and the rest of
the world, including Islam--can watch, also. AP

So the President of an American Organization linked to Hamas, the Islamic

Brotherhood, and CAIR, has been invited to lead the new President's prayer
service. Is Obama an appeaser, rather than a uniter? Keep reading.

In Act!'s newsletter, we read this: "Since we emailed you on Monday and Tuesday
about Hamas’ abuse and exploitation of children, the number of views of the video
we forwarded (showing Hamas treatment of children) more than doubled. After we
sent out the petition launch on Tuesday, the number of views increased by more
than 120,000 in less than 24 hours--our bandwidth usage on our website was higher
on Tuesday than it’s ever been. Today, we have another video for you to view.
You’ll see in greater depth and detail how Hamas is brainwashing children and
preparing the next generation of jihadists. The more we in the West see how Hamas
is operating, the more we will understand why Israel has no option but to
vigorously defend itself."

As if to explain the importance of Mattson's appearance at the Cathedral, Act!

continues: "We will also better understand why appeasement of such evil will never
lead to peace, but only serves to embolden the radical Islamists whose ultimate
goal is to impose their doctrines on the rest of us, by any means possible."

"By any means possible" in this case means being invited by Mr. Obama. Obama is an
appeaser. He has actually brought together the left and the right wings of
American politics, keeping a Republican Secretary of Defence, nominating other
more-conservative-than-liberal people to his Cabinet, while bringing in one avowed
Socialist, if not more.

This is not fence-building nor fence-mending. This is compromise, and not of

methods or plans or other things that legitimate compromise allows for. This is
compromise of the principles of individualism, and because Islamicists want to
dominate the earth it is a clear violation of the separation of church and state.

"When president-elect Barack Obama appointed Carol Browner to be his "energy czar"
back in December, the conservative blogosphere was buzzing about her being a
member of Socialist International, 'the worldwide organisation of social
democratic, socialist and labour parties.'

"At the time, she was fourth on the website's list of members in the 'Commission
for a Sustainable World Society.'" NewsBusters

The Commission " has been established by Socialist International to articulate

from the world of progressive politics a way forward to address global
environmental concerns, climate change and the issues of governance required to
deal with these common challenges."

Listen to the language of that, and realize that Obama uses the same cloaked
messages. Never once did he ever admit to being a Marxist, but never once did he
have to deny it because as far as I know no one ever asked him. Telling Joe the
Plumber he wanted to "redistribute the wealth" was enough of a give-away, but he
deftly managed to get around that thorny issue the way he is maneuvering about the
Washington Beltway of politics.

The language is, first, that the Commission will "articulate from the world of
progressive politics." "Articulate" used here is "cloak-speak" for "attempt to
dictate, cajole, plead, embarrass, harass, and otherwise politically cage the
world into progressive politics." Not from rational evidence-based science, but
from progressive politics. Progressive itself is cloak-speak for collectivism.

How can I know this? The history of socialist language is full of such examples.
The second example of such language is the Commission's statement that they
"address global environmental concerns, climate change and the issues of
governance required to deal with these common challenges."

Those issues are flatly stated as being progressive-politics oriented. Many of the
members of Socialist International are center-left. If we were worried about a
"New World Order" during the administration of Presidents Bush 41 and Clinton, we
now are going to have Mrs. Clinton as our Secretary of State, Carol Browner as
energy czar, and Mr. "redistribute the wealth" Obama as President.

I can't think of a game plan for a "new world order" of "progressive", i.e.,
socialist, politics than that plan.

The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists is the SM of

The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists LLC.
The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism TM,
The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger TM, and
Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger Extra TM are the educational arms of
the LLC and are:
© 2008-2009 by Curtis Edward Clark and Naturalist Academy Publishing ®

mailto:freeassemblage@gmail.com

http://freeassemblage.blogspot.com/