Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
More misery via the media but recent economic indicators actually tell us something
Increasingly, confidence and real outcome indicators point to a deeper downturn in the business cycle than was expected earlier. There is a risk that the slowing of activity will be forceful, with larger effects on labour and well-being. Some blame the media for the dark reports, but it is better to face the truth than to worry that negative articles will be self-fulfilling. Misery indices created from outcome data seem to tell us more than the newer indices counting words of misery in the papers, albeit these can also be informative.
Cecilia Hermansson Group Chief Economist Economic Research Department +46-8-5859 7720 cecilia.hermansson@swedbank.se
No. 10 2012 10 31
With all the information about dark economic developments, there is a concern that the reporting in itself may be self-fulfilling. The darker the articles, the lower the spending and the higher the buffer saving for rainy days. However, those who claim that the media should be careful in the way the information is presented should keep in mind that the reality actually shows a marked downturn, visible in the outcome data. Not reporting this would make it more difficult for the actors who need to be informed about the current situation, such as the employers and employees negotiating salaries, the politicians and central bankers deciding on economic policy, and the households and companies taking a stand on investment and consumption strategies. The media are therefore not to blame. The indicators show what is going on, and it is reasonable that the media communicate the most up-to-date picture of the business cycle. The truth is that misery has increased in some parts of the world, especially in Europe. The original misery index, created by the economist Arthur Okun, was merely a sum of the rates of unemployment and inflation. In the US, this misery index is falling as unemployment, especially, is coming down, and in September the index registered 9.79 (down from above 12 a year ago). In Europe, the misery index is rising, to 13.2 and 14 for the EU and the euro area, respectively, but it is much higher in Spain and Greece than in Germany. Robert Barro, another economist, later expanded the misery index to include the interest rate and the difference between actual and trend GDP growth; he then used this to analyse correlations with crime and other social developments (and, yes, they are correlated). The criticism of the misery index has been that, although unemployment is much more important than inflation to households, they are weighted equally in the index. Another criticism deals with the simplicity of the index, as misery could be related to several other matters as well. Interestingly, other types of misery indices are being developed in which the words representing misery are counted, such as layoffs, recession, depression, and economic crisis. These indices do not deal with actual outcome data of the business cycle, but rather the way actors interpret data in the media or elsewhere. At the moment, the stock exchange, e.g. in the US and in Sweden, has developed better than could have been expected from the reports on demand and profitability. One reason could be the liquidity boost from central banks, but this effect is fading; more and more, equity optimism will move closer to fixed-income pessimism, which is more in line with the reports from the real economy. There is still a chance for more optimism and less misery: better crisis management in the US and in Europe could actually turn the negative mood around. With less uncertainty about the fiscal future, actors could start taking investment and recruitment decisions, especially in the US and in emerging markets. For Europe, the outlook is more like the lyrics of the Beatles song: The long and winding road that leads to your door, will never disappear ... Cecilia Hermansson
To the Point is published as a service to our customers. We believe that we have used reliable sources and methods in the preparation of the analyses reported in this publication. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the report and cannot be held responsible for any error or omission in the underlying material or its use. Readers are encouraged to base any (investment) decisions on other material as well. Neither Swedbank nor its employees may be held responsible for losses or damages, direct or indirect, owing to any errors or omissions in To the Point.