www.2012trc.

com 2012 TORT ROLL CASE Transparent Observation Romans Thirteen Rule of Law Legal Certainty Absentia Self Evident

Equal Justice BS

http://50.6.94.198/about7.html

http://50.6.94.198/about12.html
Rag Tags Responsibilities Attorney General

Tort Attorney General Scam

CDFJI

Constitution Diligence Fiduciary Judiciary Independence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort A tort, in common law jurisdictions, is a wrong [1] that involves a breach of a civil duty (other than a 1

contractual duty) owed to someone else. It is differentiated from a crime, which involves a breach of a duty owed to society in general. Though many acts are both torts and crimes, prosecutions for crime are mostly the responsibility of the state, private prosecutions being rarely used; whereas any party who has been injured may bring a lawsuit for tort. It is also differentiated from equity, in which a petitioner complains of a violation of some right. One who commits a tortious act is called a tortfeasor. The equivalent of tort in civil law jurisdictions is delict. Tort may be defined as a personal injury; or as "a civil action other than a breach of contract."[citation needed] A person who suffers a tortious injury is entitled to receive "damages", usually monetary compensation, from the person or people responsible or liable for those injuries. Tort law defines what is a legal injury and, therefore, whether a person may be held liable for an injury they have caused. Legal injuries are not limited to physical injuries. They may also include emotional, economic, or reputational injuries as well as violations of privacy, property, or constitutional rights. Tort cases therefore comprise such varied topics as auto accidents, false imprisonment, defamation, product liability (for defective consumer products), copyright infringement, and environmental pollution (toxic torts), among many others. In much of the common law world, the most prominent tort liability is negligence. If the injured party can prove that the person believed to have caused the injury acted negligently that is, without taking reasonable care to avoid injuring others tort law will allow compensation. However, tort law also recognizes intentional torts, where a person has intentionally acted in a way that harms another, and "strict liability" or quasi-tort, which allows recovery under certain circumstances without the need to demonstrate negligence. www.POTS2013.com Power of the Spirit Constitution Act, 1982 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the

Supremacy of God
and The Rule of Law The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada - Lawyers Rules of Conduct 103) Interpretation (f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit as well as in the letter. The Supremacy of God defines the

S - Spirit unequivocally the Golden Rule

HE Human Equals Governs the interpretation of The Letter of the Law" > The Rule of Law Consistent with section 15.(1) of the Charter. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal 2

benefit of the law

without discrimination
and, in particular,

without discrimination
based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. The - Spirit is supreme in the upreme law of Canada with precedence governs the interpretation of The Letter of the Law" thus maintaining the mandatory consistency of section 15. (1) called for in section 52. (1)

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution

is,
to the extent of the inconsistency,

of no force or effect.
Perhaps every situation cannot be appropriately addressed in :The Letter of the Law", but the has precedence in perpetuity not subject to omissions deliberate or otherwise, negligence, fine print, loop holes or any obstructions to every individuals HER - Human Equality Rights that must be administered and enforced by competent responsibly accountable HE with due regard to due punishment attentive to deterrence to the certainty of the SOS Sanctity of Spirit Such deliberate omissions, negligence, fine print, loop holes or any obstructions to every individuals HER are SSRE IF PFEE Satanic Spirit Roman Empire Ipso Facto Evidence Exposed . In such incidences surfaced the policing authorities of competent jurisdiction must exhaustively investigate all sources to the horrendous crimes unobstructed and bring them before a court of competent jurisdiction that assuredly will be competent responsibly accountable scrutinized by Atomions 2013 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right

not to be deprived thereof

except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. 31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority

32. (1) This Charter applies

3

(a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. RAG Responsibilities Attorney General COPIOUS Conflict of Public Interest Obtrusively Undeniable Script

Guardian of the Public Interest

An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting criminal prosecutions is associated with

the responsibility to represent the public interest which includes not only the

community as a whole
and

the victim,
but

also the accused.

The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available.

Mandatory a Victim Representative and an Accused Representative with an absolute Court of Competent Jurisdiction Independent Judiciary to the certainty of the

SOS
Sanctity of Spirit

Public Interest

Legal Aid is Illegal 180 degrees adverse to HE - Human Equals section 15.(1) of the Charter as are private sector lawyers being the responsibility of the Attorney General as Guardian of the Public Interest to the certainty of the SOS Sanctity of Spirit
24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.

www.cdfji.ca On June 30 2005 criminal fraud offenses over $100,000 were committed against me Frank Gallagher of Keswick, Ontario, Canada witnessed, documented and recorded by the court in Newmarket Ontario administered by the Ontario Attorney General then Michael Bryant bencher of the Law Society of Upper Canada with precedence second only to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada appointing the chair and four others selecting 5 more from a list provided by the Law Society. 6

Attorney General Michael Bryant an elected representative of the Ontario Humanic was appointed by the Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty elected representative of the Ontario Humanic who advises all Ontario government departments, agencies and police hierarchy on all constitutional matters and legitimacy of laws as defined in the "Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General" published on the Ontario government web site. http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/ag/agrole.asp The Attorney General is also responsible as the

"Guardian of the Public Interest"

Ultimately the Attorney general is accountable to the people through the Legislature elected representatives of the Humanic http://www.scribd.com/doc/71053305/McFrauds Around the end of June early July 2006 I filed a complaint with the Law Society regarding another issue that began as personal, but soon realized it was part and parcel of the Law Society Scam On January 22 2007 the DOJ - Department of Justice responding on behalf of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada stated the federal government enacts federal laws, but is the responsibility of the provinces to administer and enforce them and they have no authority to intervene. Having made exhaustive effort to find one person among the Federal and Ontario government representatives that the Humanic finance including the entire structure to no avail on November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP for refusing to investigate government organized crime corruption conspiracy knowing full well the RCMP hierarchy were major players, however I needed to evidence the entire system as the public have befuddled minds about these things demonstrative of the effectiveness of their charlatan tactics through the natural process of osmosis have managed passive state set in like rigger mortise, with major help from the media across Canada that have been kept up to speed since the beginning. Immediately the Commission forwarded the complaint and evidence on to the RCMP to investigate them selves citing the RCMP Act to which RCMP Staff Sgt. R.B. MacAdam was assigned.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34905203/Commission-RCMP-Complaints-Dec-27-2007 On December 27 2007 Andre Leduc of the Complaint Commission complained that they were not competent to deal with such issues as they deal with complaints against the RCMP and will not accept anymore evidence by e-mail that will be deleted before reading. I attempted other ways to contact him, but he was now in hiding. http://www.scribd.com/doc/105693162/RCMP-Final-Letter-of-Disposition-September-3-2008 September 3 2008 RCMP District Commander of the GTA Superintendent Robert Davis signed the "RCMP Final Letter of Disposition" stating that although I had provided hundreds of pages of documents he chose not to investigate it for government organized crime corruption conspiracy demonstrating the diversionary tactics taught by the Law Society of Upper Canada diverting the serious issues to quite a minor one of unfounded conclusion finding the RCMP innocent of my complaint that they refused to investigate the irrefutable evidence of government organized crime corruption and conspiracy, while he himself signed the "RCMP Final Letter of Disposition" admitting he refused to investigate the hundreds of pages of documents that irrefutably prove government organized crime corruption conspiracy. 7

PFEE
Prima Facia Evidence Exposed The RCMP Superintendent was kind enough to inform me of that which I already knew stated on a brochure that I could apply back to the Complaints Commission for a REVIEW On September 24 2008 playing their game documenting their routine every step of the way requested a review specifically requesting they immediately get a copy of the RCMP Staff Sgt R.B. MacAdams "REPORT" now NCO i/c as he informed about a month before he finished his report apologizing for being later than he had stated in his earlier 30 day submission as he was on vacation, however understood the need to be thoughtful and thorough. The REVIEWS commission acknowledged they had requested a copy of the "REPORT", but refused to inform whether or not they received it and of course refused to acknowledge my request for a copy of it. On or about December 24 2008 Chair Paul Kennedy signed the REVIEWS Report first making me aware that the Commission was absolutely independent of the RCMP not mentioning that he was operating under the auspices of the RCMP Act with the same criminal bosses, then went on to present me an impressive pile of crap. http://www.scribd.com/doc/111695700/Commission-Complaints-Against-RCMP-Review-RCMP-FinalDisposition-12-23-08 The arrogant bastards are so convinced the Truth will never reach humanity with a semblance of prerequisite coherency to rise and take their money back just for starters, never have in the centuries prior. Sure they get caught up in civil war and world, just exchanging one ambitious Satanic for another while killing Humanic not the Satanic, of course the root of all evil ... the woes of humanic, but their minds have been so messed with, they expect the devil to have horns on head a tail, with the Pope the front man of the Mafia underground.

Access to Information and Privacy Act On November 4 2009 I began my final exercise to complete the entire Canadian system venturing their Access to Information and Privacy Act scam structured to protect themselves and criminals. I had suspected that RCMP Staff Sgt. R.B.MacAdam had been stringing me along for the 9 or so months he was supposedly investigating with each month required to send a report that generally stated am on the case and progressing. The saga of the elusive "REPORT" that finally received one purported to be the "REPORT" in March 2010, is a laugh clearly indicative of their no fear of repercussions as they document their MO akin to the 3 Stooges excruciatingly obtrusive COVER UP, being a full time job with taxpayers funding the entire scam to be Royally ransacked of quality of life with no due process to protect the Humanic as guaranteed, but obviously exemplary due diligence has been applied to protect themselves. http://www.scribd.com/doc/105694093/RCMP-Sarge-States-Apparently-I-Thought-Were-Actually-Going-toInvestigate-Government-Corruption-as-Per-Complaint If the "Report" had of been prepared and all was legitimate one must ask how long would it take to provide "The Report" if they were structured to go after the bad guys, and if they were the bad guys as all reality attests wouldn't they react something like they do, leaving an indelible trail of evidence just like the irrefutable evidence I collected for my self by simply reporting the crime they already documented, witnessed and 8

recorded in what they purport to be the people's court of justice administered under the auspices of the Constitution Act, 1982: Document with a signed guarantee by the heads of provinces, federal government and the Queen for God's sake as it states in the first line of the Charter. Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the

Supremacy of God and the rule of law.

Holy Roman Empire http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zj6w1WfBLuM&feature=related Royal Nazi Family The British Empire expanded in the same manner as the Romans and the Roman Catholics in their Christian Crusades and who has the wealth inciting the befuddled humaniti to do their own inhumanities, pointing their fingers here, there and up their noses never to wonder who or what is causing all the ruckus as they sing Christmas carols, and Grand Ole Opry Sad songs all getting wealthy never to forget to praise the Lord. The Humaniti believe they are electing persons to represent them not choosing who they would prefer to be ransacked by. So the Satanic RCMP hierarchy are documented through the Deputy Minister Commissioner, Minister of Public Safety at one time my MP, to the DOJ ... Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the Prime Minister that when Brian Mulroney was in office stole the RCMP from Humanic for God's sake

While there is no specific, universally accepted definition of 'democracy',[6] equality and freedom have both been identified as important characteristics of democracy

since ancient times.[7]

These principles are reflected in all citizens being

equal before the law and having equal access to legislative

processes. For example, in a representative democracy, every vote has equal weight, no unreasonable restrictions can apply to anyone seeking to become a representative, and the freedom of its citizens is secured by legitimized rights and liberties which are generally protected by a constitution. [8][9] There are several varieties of democracy, some of which provide better representation and more freedom for their citizens than others. [10][11] However, if any democracy is not structured

so as to prohibit the government from excluding the people from the legislative process,
or any branch of government

from altering the separation of powers in its own favor,

www.m4d.ca
Mulroney 4 Destiny Coherency Acceleration

then a branch of the system can accumulate too much power and destroy the democracy.[12][13][14]

Mulroney stole the RCMP ordered back to the people 12/31/09, but of course satanic give thumb to nose 4 finger salute in traditional recourse

Then we have the PFEE Accountability Act, April 2006 that Minister of Public Safety Vic Toews then Minister of Justice appointed by Prime Minister Harper concocted when public pressure was upon them, just 9

doing their thing ... COVER UP ... COVER UP www.McFrauds.com Is pretty much up to speed as to my personal documentation, but still much to relate in detail although the communications with the Access to Information people clearly tells itself. If they began punishing there would be so many pointing fingers available we wouldn't have to use ours for our noses for years ... I am thinking until about 2020 arrival of 20/20 vision Confucius 551 BC - 479 BC There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY ... finally began to make out what was written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE The mystery of the Satanical they hide in plain sight with the natural process of osmosis the people accept as sane and the norm

Osmosis
The gradual, often unconscious, absorption of knowledge or ideas through continual exposure

rather than deliberate learning

The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law The Rule of law in its most basic form is

no one is above the law.

Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process.

The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.

According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include

a clear separation of powers,

legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law. The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that

"the phrase the rule of law has become

10

meaningless
thanks to ideological abuse
and general over- use" GO POE General Over-use Proclamations Only Elusivity

publicly disclosed laws 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. 31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority 32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and

the right not to be deprived

thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. 15. (1) Every

individual

is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law

without discrimination
and, in particular,

without discrimination
based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

democracy, which may include elements such as political pluralism; equality before the law; the right to petition elected
officials for redress of grievances;

Many people use the term "democracy" as shorthand for liberal

11

due process;civil liberties; human rights; and elements of civil society outside the government.

In the United States,

separation of powers is often cited as a central attribute,
but in other countries, such as the United Kingdom,

the dominant principle is that of

parliamentary sovereignty (though in practice

judicial independence
democracy . Though the term "democracy" is typically used in the context of a political state, the principles are applicable to private organizations and other groups as well.
is generally maintained). In other cases, "democracy" is used to mean direct

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Jonathan/Swainger/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/70994649/Can-You-Believe-It-is-All-Tyrannical-Make-Believe-Fiction-of-theApolitical-Attorney-General 12

Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General

Downloaded from the Ontario Government web site

The Attorney General has a unique role to play as a Minister.

One part of the Attorney General's role is that of a Cabinet Minister. In this capacity the Minister is responsible for representing the interests and perspectives of the Ministry at Cabinet, while simultaneously representing the interests and perspectives of Cabinet and consequently the Government to the Ministry and the Ministry's communities of interest. The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming from this role are unlike those of any other Cabinet member. The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and as the "guardian of the public interest". JUDICIAL - LIKE? Tyrannical-like is the truth translation, something they must avoid with - no clear separation of powers Democracy Priority One Equality The Constitution equally governs us all and priority one interest of the people's elected representatives is to be in, of and with "the Spirit of the Law" unbiased, competent, responsible, irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the safety and well being equally of every individual as per the provisions of the Charter They may not have any interests overriding priority one and the Attorney General is right there advising them as chief law officer of the Executive Council as a politician appointed by the Premier an obvious CONFLICT OF INTEREST, far from a clear separation of powers, while purportedly the "Guardian of the Public Interest" The Attorney General also has precedence with the Law Society as a bencher, 2nd only to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada appointing the Chair and four others selecting 5 more from a list provided by the Law Society. Much has been written on the subject of ministerial responsibilities and the unique role of the Attorney General. There are various components of the Attorney General's role. The Attorney General has unique responsibilities to the Crown, the courts, the Legislature and the executive branch of government. While there are different emphases and nuances attached to these there is a general theme throughout all the various aspects of the Attorney General's responsibilities that the office has a constitutional and 13

traditional
responsibility beyond that of a political minister.

The statutory responsibilities of the office are found in section 5 of the Ministry of the Attorney General Act. Section 5 states:
The Attorney General, (a) is the Law Officer of the Executive Council; (b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law; (c) shall superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario; (d) shall perform the duties and have the powers that belong to the Attorney General and Solicitor General of England by law and usage, so far as those powers and duties are applicable to Ontario, and also shall perform the duties and powers that, until the Constitution Act, 1867 came into effect, belonged to the offices of the Attorney General and Solicitor General in the provinces of Canada and Upper Canada and which, under the provisions of that Act, are within the scope of the powers of the Legislature; (e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and upon all matters of law referred to him or her by the Government; (f) shall advise the Government upon all matters of a legislative nature and superintend all Government measures of a legislative nature; (g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law connected with such ministries and agency; (h) shall conduct and regulate all litigation for and against the Crown or any ministry or agency of government in respect of any subject within the authority or jurisdiction of the Legislature; (i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices; (j) shall perform such other functions as are assigned to him or her by the Legislature or by the Lieutenant Governor in Council. " What follows is an overview of the various components of the Attorney General's roles and responsibilities, primarily as outlined in the Act. Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a)) The role of chief law officer might be referred to as the Attorney General's overall responsibility as the independent legal advisor to the Cabinet - and some have even suggested that the role possibly extends to the Legislature as well. The importance of the independence of the role is fundamental to the position and well established in common law, statutes and tradition. As chief law officer, the Attorney General has

a special responsibility
to be the guardian of 14

that most elusive concept

- the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but

hard to easily define.

It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties.

Legal Certainty

?
The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid. In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General's policy advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet. The Attorney General's legal advice or constitutional advice should not be lightly disregarded. The Attorney General's policy advice has the same weight as that of other ministers. Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d)) One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General's role is the responsibility for criminal prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section 92 gives the provinces authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justice and thereby gives the provincial Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal Code. The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether or not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the prosecution should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney. http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827620/Law-Society-of-Upper-Canada This compilation of documents of my communications with the Law Society having filed a complaint against one of their members for absolute disregard for my equal Charter rights eventually drew an admittance either stated or implied that their members are not required to give a damn about every individual's equally guaranteed Charter rights as they state their only responsibility is to vigorously advance the interests of their client, that obviously means the wealthy that can afford their exorbitant extortion fees, that is prohibitive to the 80% majority, but not them on Legal Aid that the taxpayer of the 80% majority finance their defense filling the kitty to overflowing to give the Law Society members a luxurious lifestyle in their system structured in organized crime style with the private sector illegal, however coined by the hierarchy as legal since they are of the belief they can do whatever they like and hence whatever they do is legal, with the media cooperatives the majority haven't a chance ... humanity no chance for sanity. OITINGO 15

Once In There Is No Getting Out I persisted for months and finally they stated that they are not required to look at evidence when it is against their members, which should be enough for a Public Inquiry if there was one legitimate person among them, but the prodigious amount of evidence published on the Charter democracy Force web sites irrefutably proves they are all in on the government organized crime with its success dependent on them all regardless of which political party to stay united on this one cause against the 90% majority they deliberately set out to ransack with the structured system and their illegitimate laws 180 degrees adverse to the Constitution as they have used the people's trust and the taxpayers money to structure their obvious organized crime syndicate headquartered as the Law Society which their members have infested the people's political/legal system and infested and invested the corporate world as they administer and enforce laws conducive to their UPIG (Ultimate Personal Interest Group) having gained their positions as Criminal Frauds. The RCMP subscribe to the Law Society ideology investigating complaints against their members without looking at the evidence as per the complaint, but to look for something they believe they can run with diverting the issues as their success is dependent of the charlatan skills honed over the generations

CanLaw www.canlaw.com a national lawyer referal service state on the front page of their web site that
the Law Society cannot be trusted confirming what I had experienced as they protect their members from the consumer not the consumer from their members. http://www.scribd.com/doc/36191213/Can-Law-August-182008
They had plenty to state on their web site so I downloaded some significant stuff and although I had provided the evidence of government organized crime to the Federation of Law Societies and Bar associations across Canada that seemed inane to address CanLaw for help, I did anyway and sure enough they confirmed I was a wild and crazy guy.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828389/Star-Lawyer-Increase-July262008
The Law Society with the Ontario Attorney General who is purported to be the "guardian of the public interest" acting as the Crown as documented in the R & R of the AG published by the Ontario government web site who is a bencher with precedence of the Law Society that appoints the chair and four others and selects 5 more from a list provided by the Society second only to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada who both advise their respective government departments, agencies and police demonstrate "Conflict of Interest" to the epitome of illegitimate legal absurdity, that of course accounts for their successful reign ransacking the people of the 90% majority at will having unequivocally failed to demonstrate even a hint of due diligence applied to the sanctity of the Constitution that would invariably end their success as an organized crime syndicate which the 80% majority funds their entire overhead and funds the thriving business they continue to expand in the poverty sector that they create where hopelessness and despair is inherent where amoral inclination stirs advancing to criminal persuasion that leaves many victims in their wake including themselves which the York Regional Police cite the "Threshold" that separates me and the majority of the populace from our legal right to justice whereas due punishment for crimes is a consistent prerequisite to the certainty that every individual knows "the Spirit of the Law" is enforced with fortitude and conviction attentive to deterrence being the only viable means of present knowledge to the certainty they we are all equally governed, protected and benefited as guaranteed. They know the people frown on the concept of a 2 TIER System so simply use the word "Threshold" that easily fools the 90% majority whose minds have been seriously messed with by the "Hierarchy of State and Church" as they carry out their conspiracy plan to perfection easy to ransack the "Dumb Bi Ass" that ultimately cooperate to the detriment of society as a whole.

16

10 80 10 Proof
They actually are correct stating No 2 Tier as there are obviously three with the third provided illegitimate legal aid

Osgoode Hall Behind it All

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824629/Osgoode-Hall-Compiled-1-18-09 The government political/legal system hierarchy have always known they are illegal and even the reports they commission when manipulating and orchestrating the people's minds to fill the Legal Aid kitty who are empathetic to the impoverished and humongously passive with befuddled inherent BI ASS minds that not only allows this absurdity to continue, but finance it and support them against individual's like me that attempt against all odds with the media on the conspiracy side to get the prodigious amount of irrefutable evidence to the people that just by knowing the truth and informing the government criminals that they know will inevitably cause the collapse of their conspiracy with a newly structured system eminent consistent with the Constitution with a due process of law to ensure the people's representatives are coherent to their legitimate responsibilities and will assuredly be held accountable. It is absolutely clear that every individual must give a damn about every individual's equally guaranteed Charter rights in particularly because it is the process that inherently protects every individual equally and the Law Society that was mandated a monopoly under the 1797 Law Society Act to propagate "Learned and Honourable" persons to administer the laws of Upper Canada, now Ontario consistent with the Constitution with fortitude and conviction to every individual's equally guaranteed Charter rights is unequivocally required to give a damn about every individual's equally guaranteed Charter rights. It is the foundation ... that is "the Spirit of the Law" the epitome of simplicity and sanity that is the BENCH MARK derived of common sense that common sense is measured. It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry out the Minister's criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political pressures. The Attorney General's responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken - and seen to be undertaken - on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations. Whether to initiate or stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy. This responsibility has been characterized as a matter of the Attorney General acting as the Queen's Attorney - not as a Minister of the government of the day. This is not to suggest that decisions regarding criminal prosecutions are made in a complete vacuum. A wide range of policy considerations may be weighed in executing this responsibility, and the Attorney General may choose to consult the Cabinet on some of these considerations. However any decisions relating to the conduct of individual prosecutions must be the Attorney General's alone and independent of the traditional Cabinet 17

decision making process. In practice, in the vast majority of cases, these decisions are made by the Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys. They are all the people's representatives that must be in, of and with "the Spirit of the Law" to the certainty of the sanctity of the Constitution that must consistently equally govern, protect, benefit and punish us all when due.

PFEE
An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting criminal prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest which includes not only the community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused.
That is everyone consistent with s.15 (1) Charter 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law

without discrimination
and, in particular,

without discrimination
based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available. But the Law Society propagates of the political/legal system obstruct the police demanding warrants being absolutely incomprehensibly irresponsible and illegal ... obstructing justice that only serves to protect the criminal element which they are the major players operating a crime syndicate with the people's money and protecting themselves from the competent police officer that may see the need to venture into the realm of their financial portfolios and numbered accounts like that of Mulroney that they must find a way to get him off, as last I heard his tax evasion was inappropriate.

18

RUNS 13 Responsibly Unaccountable Nuances Satanic 13 www.sataniclaw.com Attorney General, guardian of the public interest 13. (1) The Attorney General for Ontario shall serve as the guardian of the public interest in all matters within the scope of this Act or having to do in any way with the practice of law in Ontario or the provision of legal services in Ontario, and for this purpose he or she may at any time require the production of any document or thing pertaining to the affairs of the Society. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.8, s. 13 (1); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (1); 2006, c. 21, Sched. C, s. 13. Admissions (2) No admission of any person in any document or thing produced under subsection (1) is admissible in evidence against that person in any proceedings other than proceedings under this Act. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.8, s. 13 (2); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (2). Protection of Minister (3) No person who is or has been the Attorney General for Ontario is subject to any proceedings of the Society or to any penalty imposed under this Act for anything done by him or her while exercising the functions of such office. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.8, s. 13 (3); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (3). www.m4d.ca Mulroney is a Prime example of the legal profession infesting the people's political/legal system infesting and investing the corporate world as such people are highly welcome in the corporate world with major influence gained in trust with obvious insider information as to how to get things done. They know BRIBERY is illegal so they legalize it as LOBBYISM with Schreiber linked to an armaments dealer with a vested interest in wars and the hierarchy on the take we have wars and as for giving out government secrets and unfair influence advantage they divert the issues as to whether he was bribed before or after a date as if there actually is a difference because it is influence gained in public trust the corporations know well it is as valuable whether he is in office or not having all the insider information and relative connections. Retired Major-General when coherent admits war racket http://www.wanttoknow.info/warisaracket Military corruption USA Billions if not trillions 1/29/02 http://www.wanttoknow.info/corruptiongovernmentmilitary Conflict of Interest is precisely what they are all about being why they are particularly trained as charlatans specialist of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration with all political parties involved sworn to a code, once in there is no way out except how they got rid of Zack the former RCMP Commissioner when newly appointed was reported on

September 13 2000 by the North Shore News

stating he was no "Political Patsy" as he informed organized crime was infesting the people's government. Poor Zack was not aware that governments are organized crime with their entire overhead covered by the 19

unknowing taxpayer of the 80% majority that is absolutely ignorant in such matters as they have other chosen fields of Endeavour that they know well of the value of competence and responsibility for a successful career. PFEE consistent with the S and s15. (1) of the Charter So as it clearly states in the "R & R of the AG" the Attorney General is responsible to protect the public interest that not only includes the community and the victim, but the accused.

So who the hell else is there?

Why do they send victims to the private sector lawyer they cannot afford when guaranteed charter rights?

Government organized crime personified

The Attorney General is Responsible ergo Accountable to protect the Public Interest independent of Cabinet and political influence with the private sector lawyer illegitimate extortionists of exorbitant fees and the Legal Aid system absolutely illegal, just an example of how brazen the Satanic are right out front like the Pope that sits preaches upon the people's wealth flaunting Jesus they spiked to a cross for attempting to awake the people

With everyone presumed innocent until found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt where the police unequivocally have the responsibility to collect all pertinent evidence and the Attorney General's agents ... Crown Attorneys unequivocally have the responsibility to present all creditable evidence available they cannot possibly meet that requirement by obstructing the police from their clear and certain responsibility in the interest of every individual equally in society who are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a legitimately exercised court of law. It is absolutely clear that until all pertinent evidence is collected unobstructed absent of bias with fortitude and conviction to competent responsible and irreproachable investigative practice for the sole purpose to determine the truth can justice be had to the certainty of every individual's equally guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and equal benefit. Prior to the prerequisite responsibilities of the police and Crown everyone is presumed innocent and the victim is of the alleged status as well as the accused and as assured as we are all inherently bias with the CROWN PROSECUTOR taking the side of the victim of the cases they choose to prosecute will have an obvious tendency not to willingly defeat themselves and the accused must have the same equal rights as the alleged victim with all the kings horses and all the kings men as equally cooperative to the CROWN DEFENDER assigned to the presumed innocent accused that will have an inherent bias interest to produce all pertinent evidence to the certainty of equal protection and equal benefit of all involved that assuredly includes society as a whole that are not equally protected if the innocent is punished and the guilty allowed to escape the justice necessary to eradicate the evil spirit of the criminal persuasion. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. In matters of law we of the 90% majority are mentally handicapped when the political/legal system is obviously organized crime with the people willingly supporting it, due their inherent Bi Ass that allows them to 20

accept 10% poverty for the humongous odds of becoming one of the 10% wealthy as they have no comprehension of the concept of equality that demands equal support prior to knowingly becoming a victim when they will then know they have been a victim of organized crime all along. 10 80 10 Proof This document knocked a lawyer conglomerate active in 49 states occupied Hawaii and Canada off the web. (Actually imperialists occupy the world illegally) The responsibility is to present the case fairly - not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One of the Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the public in understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function. The concept is clear not to convict or they would all be in jail. The system is designed not to protect the people, but to provide a debating arena to profit and flourish that requires a flourishing criminal element Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature, for decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the prosecution is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicae rule bars any comment on a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub judicae rule strictly prohibits the Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions that are before the courts. Given the stature of the Attorney General's position, any public comment coming from the office would be seen as an attempt to influence the case. Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individual criminal cases, such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political interference. Accordingly, it is traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of the Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where the public would expect the Attorney General to be briefed. The Attorney General has extraordinary influence over the entire legal system who is politically appointed by the Premier with all cases influenced by the office of the Attorney General that all laws are enacted under political influence by person's proclaiming to be the people's representatives obviously criminal frauds that do not give a damn about every individual's guaranteed Charter rights irrefutably documented, not a challenge at all because they believe they have the system securely fixed to protect them while they ransack society sharing with their corporate friends who scratch each others backs in their unrelenting persistence driven by their insatiable Bi Ass Legislative Responsibilities (s. 5(e) and (f)) The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These responsibilities have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in accordance with principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) above). This is obviously an important and broad area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise on the constitutionality and legality of legislation. The Attorney General's legislative responsibilities are played out in a variety roles. The Office of Legislative Counsel reports to the Attorney General. Legislative Counsel plays a key role in ensuring the legal integrity of Government legislation. Although the Legislative Counsel's reporting relationship to the Attorney General does allow the Attorney General to provide guidance and set standards, individual pieces of legislation are drafted on instructions from client ministries and are not within the sole control of Legislative Counsel or the 21

Attorney General. It should also be noted that Legislative Counsel also has a direct responsibility to the Legislature as the Office also drafts all private member's bills. The Attorney General has a further role to play as part of whatever Cabinet Committee is formed to review legislation and regulations. Here the Minister has an opportunity to comment on the technical issues related to legislation and regulations prior to Cabinet consideration. The Attorney General's role on legislative matters is as an adviser to the Cabinet. Although unlikely, Cabinet could, in theory, receive the Attorney General's legal opinion on legislation and choose to disregard it. The Attorney General's role is not independent of Cabinet decision making as in the area of criminal prosecutions. As was noted earlier, the Attorney General must make careful distinctions about the legal opinions and policy or political preferences being offered about legislation. Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d)) He must make careful distinction between what is legal and what is not conducive to the sanctity of the Constitution that equally governs, protects and benefits only when they have been exposed and deposed replaced with persons in of and with "the Spirit of the Law" with the eradication of the private sector illegitimate legal profession that profits to luxurious lifestyle dealing with the symptoms created by their partners in crime that have infested the people's political/legal system In addition to the specific responsibilities to conduct civil litigation on behalf of the Government and its agencies (s. 5(h)), the Attorney General has broader litigation responsibilities flowing from the historical powers of the Attorney General referred to in s. 5(d) of the Act. These powers are based on the Crown's parens patriae (parental) authority. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only to conduct litigation in cases directly affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases where there is a clear matter of public interest or public rights at stake. This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is well and independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter challenges to legislation, even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionally protected rights. Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c)) A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice in the province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison with the judiciary. Given the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, the responsibility for courts administration is often a very sensitive and delicate issue. Great care and respect for the principles of judicial independence must be exercised in this area. ****************************** Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General Published on the Ontario Government web site ******************************* Attorney General, guardian of the public interest 22

13. (1) The Attorney General for Ontario shall serve as the guardian of the public interest in all matters within the scope of this Act or having to do in any way with the practice of law in Ontario or the provision of legal services in Ontario, and for this purpose he or she may at any time require the production of any document or thing pertaining to the affairs of the Society. R.S.O. 1990,c. L.8, s. 13 (1); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (1); 2006, c. 21, Sched. C, s. 13. Admissions (2) No admission of any person in any document or thing produced under subsection (1) is admissible in evidence against that person in any proceedings other than proceedings under this Act. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.8, s. 13 (2); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (2).

Protection of Minister
(3) No person who is or has been the Attorney General for Ontario is subject to any proceedings of the Society or to any penalty imposed under this Act for anything done by him or her while exercising the functions of such office. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.8, s. 13 (3); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (3). ********************************************

Of the opinion can be responsible but not ACCOUNTABLE

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority 32. (1) (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. ******************************************** The Attorney General must be and is RESPONSIBLE therefore ACCOUNTABLE subject to equal due punishment no different than any individual that must abide by the Law with one humongous difference being his RESPONSIBILITY as "Guardian of the Public Interest" to ensure every individual is equally governed, equally protected, equally benefited and equally punished when due. Every individual is presumed to be unbiased, competent, responsible and irreproachable in, of and with The Spirit of the Law that is the Spirit of the Golden Rule that has precedence over the Letter of the Law being the only environment in which the terms of the Charter guarantee can be met being a fixed state that when a person becomes a V (Victim) the government/legal system must be able to demonstrate due diligence has been applied adept to the exemplary support of the Charter GUARANTEE, not the responsibility of individuals to hire lawyers being extortionists for that which we are guaranteed by the government that is ultimately the Responsibility of the Attorney General "Guardian of the Public Interest" accountable to the people through the Legislature with them all irrefutably proving themselves to be the most pathetically irresponsible group of Prehistoric Apes absolutely indifferent to the 90% majority who they have always believed were part and parcel of the regions or countries Resources: Natural and Human that they need to recover the natural resources and convert to consumer products to maintain and enhance the wealthy's HOE (Heaven on Earth) By law in the Spirit of the Golden Rule they are required to be, unbiased, competent, responsible and irreproachable to back every individual's equally guaranteed Charter rights to be equally governed, equally protected, equally benefited and equally punished when due that assuredly applies to them.

This Charter applies

23

The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada - Lawyers Rules of Conduct 103) Interpretation (f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the

spirit as well as in the letter.

The Spirit has Supremacy with the letter of the law ceding to the Supremacy Of God and the Rule of Law in the first statement of the Charter "Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law" Every individual's guaranteed Charter rights were granted absolute in perpetuity beginning with the 1982 enactment of the Constitution not limited or subject to incompetence or negligence deliberate or otherwise that is ultimately the responsibility of the people's government who appoint the Attorney General to be responsible as the "Guardian of the Public Interest" thus responsible to competently back every individual equally with The Spirit of the Law in hand being precisely all he needs to do the job that is a good thing, but they cannot address every situation with the Letter of the Law and even if they could the laws must be consistent with The Spirit of the Law being the epitome of simplicity and sanity not only the Benchmark of Common Sense but the Catalyst of the prerequisite CONSISTENCY demanded in CONTINUITY to meet the terms of the Charter guarantee to every individual, being priority one to every individual having a vested interest in living and existing the quality of life they are entitled to as an equal relative to fair pay for efforts exerted. When an individual becomes a V (Victim) the obvious fact is they are not so protected as the guarantee suggests and the government must be able to demonstrate due diligence was applied to the exemplary support required of the guarantee. This is not just an AUTOMOBILE we are talking about, as it is HUMAN LIFE for God sakes and about the struggle to collect possessions in the advancement of quality of life. "Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness" It is the governments immediate responsibility to determine who deliberately caused the individual to be a V, directly or indirectly and take appropriate action applying due diligence to exemplary deterrence applying the due punishment that when the perpetrator is not considered a danger to society priority must be to make the perpetrator recompense the V to the status prior to becoming a V and if the perpetrator does not have the cash the courts must make arrangements with the perpetrator to pay them back while accepting their responsibility to back the guarantee to get the V up and running again as if the occurrence never happened. When it is determined that the government personnel were deliberately negligent in structuring the legal system adept to protect every individual they all received salaries and benefits under false pretense as Criminal Frauds parleying the money stolen from the taxpayers advancing quality of life at their humongous detriment that goes far beyond just the money leaving the people that trusted them unprotected as guaranteed. When one looks into why they deliberately neglected to structure the system adept to protect every individual as guaranteed it is excruciatingly obvious that they could not simultaneously protect and ransack them, being impossibility wouldn't you think? A serious Conflict of Interest No matter how many laws, acts whatever they enacted prior to and after the enactment of the 1982 Constitution they are governed by the Spirit of the Law being the epitome of simplicity and sanity with precedence untouchable by humankind invisible and invincible securely fixed that any sane individual at 5 prior to the first day of school can understand thus no reason in hell why adult professionals of the thing cannot understand and their luxurious lifestyles give them up as being mentally competent to provide for self ergo will not be able to attempt the incompetent imbecile route just because of the consistency with the way they perform their obvious RESPONSIBILITIES that assuredly they are ACCOUNTABLE and know it or would not spend all their time 24

covering their asses while having the public believe their safety and equal benefits are being looked after as guaranteed. There can be no doubt that they and their affluent and influential friends of the Corporate World Capitalism a form of tyranny absolutely 180 degrees adverse to democracy, the Rule of Law and the Spirit of the Law thus acted without Authority of the Law that they collected taxes illegally to finance their own Empire in, of and with the Spirit of the Roman Empire that exists today throughout all governments of regions and country as all reality and evidence extracted from reality as that published on the Bastards Law site attests as does the majority of government documents being why they have the taxpayer fund the Access to Information and Privacy Act to protect the criminal element with the government hierarchy affluent and influential friends the major players as they demonstrated their modus operandi when I attempted to get a copy of the original RCMP Staff Sgt. R.B. MacAdam's report who was assigned by the RCMP Commissioner's office to investigate the charge of the RCMP refusing to investigate the evidence I provided them that irrefutably proved the government was organized crime corruption conspiracy personified filing the same evidence with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP November 8 2007 that the Commission immediately forwarded to the RCMP Commissioner to have the RCMP investigate themselves. That is an excruciatingly obvious Conflict of Interest, consistent with the Attorney General of Ontario responsible as the "Guardian of the Public Interest" clearly stated in the Law Society Act that also clearly states in section 13. (3) that he is not RESPONSIBLE both as absolutely clear in the Letter providing an excellent example of why we must refer to the Spirit of the Law that we can see 13. (3) was deliberately placed and of course inconsistent with The Spirit in absolute Conflict of Interest as the "Guardian of the Public Interest" that the taxpayer could have financed the services of a Frog and his or her assigns exorbitantly cheaper since the 1982 enactment of the Constitution that could have existed in the swamps with us where we struggle to keep our heads above water to fight off the crocodiles with far too much on our plates to notice the Sharks and Bottom Feeder Piranha gulping away at our quality of life. The frog would not have been able to write like the government legal system personnel that costs a humongous amount, yet not able to structure a system adept to eradicate the criminal element from the people's government and protect every individual as equally guaranteed and more important would not be able to write illegitimate laws to equally protect themselves from the Public Interest, and thus would not be so complicated to glean through all that crap to see that they are illegitimate for ulterior purpose, but Common Sense in the reality of humankind that every individual able to is responsible to provide for self that commonly is done by working for a living that employers demand responsible people for their jobs that acquiesced through the generations in the process of osmosis and I would highly suspect the majority would expect the government personnel that lead them to believe that they represent them would do so responsibly requiring minds greater than any Toad able to demonstrate due diligence to put to paper a due process to equally govern, equally protect, equally benefit and equally punish every individual equally when due in, of and with the Spirit with fortitude and conviction to the SOS (Sanctity Of Spirit) that we all depend on. For innumerable government personnel representatives of the people to state that I have accessed all the institutions available to me leaving me a V while aiding and abetting the Criminal's Flight from Justice is indicative of innumerable minds collectively dwarfed by that of a single Toad admitting the incompetence of the system, having failed to put to words a due process to charge a Criminal Fraud when he commits the criminal acts in their courts documenting, witnessing and recording, so they believe they can just say sorry not providing the response I would prefer, but I can go to a lawyer and take the matter up in civil court, while they already have the irrefutable evidence in their hands, being pathetically absurd that they would allow criminal acts in the people's courts all evidence that the courts and the people's representatives are not the people's with the location of the wealth akin to the infamous "Smoking Gun. . The absence of due process that they have clearly stated is not absent at all, as documented in the 15 Lawyer Files on the Charter Democracy Force site due process of Deliberate neglect of RESPONSIBILITY, Deliberate 25

Obstruction of Justice, Deliberate Aiding and Abetting the Criminal's Flight from Justice clearly adverse to the Spirit of the Law thus the Archenemy of the supremacy of God that could be defined metaphorically as the Devil's Disciples with out one iota of proof that they aren't. If we were to accept their Bull Shit that there was no due process written to deal with this situation that is extraordinarily pathetically imbecilic equivalent to stating that there is No Law and No Guaranteed Charter rights that though they are specialist at covering things up as I have documented and most adept charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration prerequisite of their chosen careers by what authority do they act if not by force in the tyrannical Spirit of the Roman Empire? Will they attempt to cover-up all traces of the Constitution and revert to armed conflict with the people they proclaim to represent that of course would be just as absurd as they have irrefutably demonstrated. So I suspect they will have great difficulty explaining that of course there is a Constitution and of course we never intended to actually enforce it, because we are in, of and with the Spirit of the Roman Empire and own all the Resources: Natural and Human to do with as we like to best suit our interests being clearly stated in the Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General who advises us all that we appointed to do so. Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a)) As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the

guardian of that most elusive concept

- the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define. It is the rule of law

that protects individuals, and society as a whole,

from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties.
Rule of Law The rule of law is a legal maxim which provides that no person is above the law, that no one can be punished by the state except for a breach of the law, and that no one can be convicted of breaching the law except in the manner set forth by the law itself.

The rule of law stands in contrast to the idea that the leader is above the law a feature of Roman Law, Nazi law, and certain other legal systems.
The phrase has been used since the 17th century, but the concept is older. For example, the Greek philosopher Aristotle said, "Law should govern".[2]

One way to be free from the rule of law is by denying that an enactment has the necessary attributes of law.
The rule of law has therefore been described as

"an exceedingly elusive notion"[3] giving rise to a

26

"rampant divergence of understandings".[4]

At least two principal conceptions of the rule of law can be identified: a formalist or "thin" and a

substantive or "thick"
definition of the rule of law.

Formalist definitions of the rule of law

do not make a judgment about the "justness" of law itself,

but define specific procedural attributes that a legal framework must have in order to be in compliance with the rule of law. Substantive conceptions of the rule of law go beyond this and include certain substantive rights

that are said to be based on,

or derived from, the rule of law.[5]

Sovereignty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty Sovereignty is the quality of having supreme, independent authority over a geographic area, such as a territory.[1] It can be found in a power to rule and make law that rests

on a political fact for which no purely legal explanation can be provided.

In theoretical terms,
the idea of "sovereignty", historically, from Socrates to Thomas Hobbes, has always necessitated a entity exercising it.

moral imperative on the

According to the Ancient Roman statesman Cicero, "We are all servants of the laws in order that we may be free."[10] During the Roman Republic, controversial magistrates might be put on trial when their terms of office expired. Under the Roman Empire,

the sovereign was personally immune (legibus solutus), but those with grievances could sue the treasury.[6
SSS Satanic Sucker Sandwich
http://50.6.94.198/about16.html

PIG/Trough/PIGLET Treasury aka

Trough
27

aka http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humans Humans (known taxonomically as Homo sapiens,[3][4] Latin for "wise man" or "knowing man")[5] are the only living species in the Homogenus. Anatomically modern humans originated in Africa about 200,000 years ago, reaching full behavioral modernity around 50,000 years ago.[6] Humans have a highly developed brain and are capable of abstract reasoning, language, introspection, and problem solving. This mental capability, combined with an erect body carriage that frees the hands for manipulating objects, has allowed humans to make far greater use of tools than any other living species on Earth. Other higher-level thought processes of humans, such as self-awareness, rationality, and sapience,[7][8][9] are considered to be defining features of what constitutes a "person".[citation needed]

2009
[edit] International Bar Association The Council of the International endorsing a

Bar Association passed a resolution in 2009

definition of the rule of law:[47]

substantive or "thick"

An independent, impartial judiciary; the presumption of innocence; the right to a fair and public trial without undue delay; a rational and proportionate approach to punishment; a strong and independent legal profession;

strict protection of confidential communications between lawyer and client;

equality of all before the law; these are all fundamental principles of the Rule of Law. Accordingly, arbitrary arrests; secret trials; indefinite detention without trial; cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; intimidation or corruption in the electoral process, are all unacceptable. The Rule of Law is the foundation of a civilised society. It establishes a transparent process accessible and equal to all. It ensures adherence to principles that both liberate and protect. The IBA calls upon all countries to respect these fundamental principles. It also calls upon its members to speak out in support of the Rule of Law within their respective communities. 28

There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words Benevolence Righteousness and Morality finally I began to make out what was written between the lines. The whole volume was but a single phrase, Eat People www.2012trc.com

Trek for justice E-mail addresses of prominent government personnel media who have been informed requesting their aid on behalf of Humanity failure to rise to the occasion WOW Write Own Epitaph in legible invisible ink http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827903/A-a-a-a-a-a-List http://www.scribd.com/doc/36191972/GLIST3-21-10 http://www.scribd.com/doc/45745722/Hiti-World-BE-vs-God-Dog-With-Truth
The document "Sun Editor October 8 2006" has been automatically removed from Scribd by our automated copyright protection system because it appears very similar to an unauthorized copyrighted document that was previously removed from Scribd. Like all automated text-matching systems, ours sometimes makes mistakes. If you believe this document is not infringing and was removed in error, please contactcopyright@scribd.com They ignore my responses and will be dealt with

Sun Editor October 8 2006

29

https://docs.google.com/viewer? a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B5iNcSV6VGAPNjQxY2Y5M2MtYThmZC00ZGQ3LTgzMGQtY TNhNDQxNDNlNDUw&hl=en http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827346/Mad-Glad-Mostly-Sad-WHY http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828127/Dave-Grech-Sptember-1-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827925/BioSafe-Chronical-31 Rod Bradbury Testimony

The document "Rod Bradbury" has been automatically removed from Scribd by our automated copyright protection system because it appears very similar to an unauthorized copyrighted document that was previously removed from Scribd. Like all automated text-matching systems, ours sometimes makes mistakes. If you believe this document is not infringing and was removed in error, please contactcopyright@scribd.com

Rod Bradbury Testimony now published on Google https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KR6zE9_y68aFmlI8fM2r_KW3mPJamUuepN-I_1SyxXE/edit?hl=en# http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827620/Law-Society-of-Upper-Canada http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828389/Star-Lawyer-Increase-July-262008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/36191213/Can-Law-August-182008 Deleted http://www.scribd.com/frank_gallagher/d/89560093-Can-Law-National-Lawyer-referral-states-Law-Societycan-t-be-trusted-so-I-had-crazy-idea-they-could-be-but-they-confirmed-I-was-a-wild-and-crazy-guy http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827864/Legal-Aid http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824629/Osgoode-Hall-Compiled-1-18-09 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827285/Canadian-Bar-Association-December-13-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827457/Canadian-Bar-Association-October-52008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828133/MHA I/E http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828127/Dave-Grech-Sptember-1-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828215/Julia-Munro-July-10 2006 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828193/Julia-July-23-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828196/Julia-July-25-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828186/August-192007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828211/Julia-Munro-August-212007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828218/Julia-Munro-November-52007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34808714/Jim-Wilson-MPP-April-26-2009 John Gerretsen http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828179/September-272006 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828174/JohnGerretsencoverApril12007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828144/Dear-John-June-20-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828176/June-242007

30

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34907017/Ombudsman Compiled September 16 2006 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34906918/Andre-Marin-Compiled July 3 2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34906971/Ombudsman-July-5-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34826937/Public-Accounts-Ombudsman-September-12-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34906968/Fax-Cover-Ombudsman-September-17-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34906933/AndreMarinCompiled-October92007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34906975/Ombudsman-December-28-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34906963/Ombudsman-Ponders-His-Ass-October-32008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34906954/OmbudsmanCompiled10-3-08 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827508/Ombudsman-October-312008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824149/Ontario-Premier-and-Attorney-General-Registered-MAIL-August-202009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828050/To-Dalton-October-21-2006 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827512/PremierDaltonMcGuintyNovember22008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827439/Attorney-General-Chris-Bentley-November-22008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824149/Ontario-Premier-and-Attorney-General-Registered-MAIL-August-202009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43734981/Dalton-McGuinty-7-17-10 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43735144/Dalton-McGuinty-on-Trial-7-17-10

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824172/OPP-Anti-Rackets-Det-SGt-Informed-Reg-Mail-November-2-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827497/Julian-Fan-Ti-No-November-42008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827514/Provincial-Police-November-72008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827364/Randy-Craig-November-7-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824753/Yrp-Opp-Reg-Mail-July-17-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/65912388/Request-Georgina-Council-Help-July-23-2009 http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2010/02/03/charge-against-opp-commissioner-julianfantino-withdrawn.aspx Fantino charges dropped http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827552/Ministry-of-Safety-Correctional-Services-August-15-2007 Black Book http://www.scribd.com/doc/34907072/the-BB http://www.scribd.com/doc/34907074/The-BB-is-Now-in-the-Hands-of-GLIST-1-3-09 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827870/Lieutenant-Governor-Ontario July 15 2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34907080/The-BB-is-Now-in-the-Lieutenant-Govenor-s-Court January 1 2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43401492/-Index-BLACK-BOOK-Sept-18-06-Senator http://www.scribd.com/doc/43402021/Black-Book deleted by Scribd 31

The document "Black Book" has been automatically removed from Scribd by our automated copyright protection system because it appears very similar to an unauthorized copyrighted document that was previously removed from Scribd. Like all automated text-matching systems, ours sometimes makes mistakes. If you believe this document is not infringing and was removed in error, please contactcopyright@scribd.com Black Book now published on Google https://docs.google.com/leaf? id=0B5iNcSV6VGAPNjY4YjBhYjMtZGUxMi00ZmFiLWJiODktYmU0NTgyY2NkYjkw&hl=en

http://www.scribd.com/doc/43402227/Black-Book-II-1-Preamble http://www.scribd.com/doc/43403758/Black-Book-II-1 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43402832/Black-Book-II-2 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43403397/Black-Book-III http://www.scribd.com/doc/43403941/BLACK-BOOK-IV http://www.scribd.com/doc/43404515/Black-Book-V http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817076/Lawyer-File-1 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817131/Lawyer-File-2 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817257/Lawyer-File-3 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817310/Lawyer-File-4 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817345/Lawyer-File-5 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817505/Lawyer-File-6 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817522/Lawyer-File-7 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817587/Lawyer-File-8 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817610/Lawyer-File-9 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817622/Lawyer-File-10 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817625/Lawyer-File-11 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817627/Lawyer-File-12 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817628/Lawyer-File-13 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817629/Lawyer-File-13A http://www.scribd.com/doc/43817631/Lawyer-File-14 Lawyer File # 1 ORHT-Rick Hennessey Lawyer File # 2 IEU - Dave Grech Lawyer File # 3 Minister Municipal Affairs and Housing -John Gerretsen Lawyer File # 4 Ombudsman-Gerry Carlino Lawyer File # 5 MY MPP Julia Munro Lawyer File #6 Premier Dalton Mcguinty Lawyer File # 7 Attorney General Michael Bryant Lawyer File # 8 OPP - Det Sgt. Randy Craig Lawyer File # 9 YRP - Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge Lawyer File # 10 Ontario Civilian Commission on Police services Lawyer File # 11 Office Ontario Attorney General Lawyer File # 12 YRP - Phil Moreau-Standards Lawyer File # 13 Crown Attorney-Robert McCreary-New Market Lawyer File # 13A Crown Attorney - Paul Culver-Toronto Lawyer File # 14 RCMP - Sgt. Michael Thompson http://www.scribd.com/doc/35166454/DOJ-January222007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43467649/-PreambleFederalcorrespondenceRecap-October-9-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827427/Stockwell-Day-November-3 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827428/Stockwell-Day-November-5-07 No 2 Tier 32

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827316/DOJ-November-6-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827338/Insp-Verheul-RCMP-November-7-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34905200/RCMP-Phoned-Friday-December-21 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827334/Harper-Nicholson-and-Day-December-31-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34808665/Government-Organized-Crime-Take-Down-by-Legal-Means http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824728/YRP-OPP-RCMP-Informed-Why-COMMON-SENSE-is-NecessaryReg-Mail-July-17-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34826931/CDF-Asks-Harper-ASSHOLE-or-STUPID-ASS-Registered-Mail May 6 2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824482/Impatiently-We-Wait-for-Harper-to-Signal-the-Start-of-the-End-of-theStruggle-of-Humankind June 3 2009

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824260/Red-Coats-or-Camouflage-to-the-Rescue-or-Slaughter January 3 2009 Screwed up most missing http://www.scribd.com/doc/56627254/Red-Coats-or-Camouflage-to-the-Rescue-or-Slaughter http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827348/Major-Simiana-December-23-07 Ministerial Correspondence Unit DOJ - MOJAG http://www.scribd.com/doc/34899918/2-1-10-and-Prior-AIA-Complaint-Against-RCMP February 1 2010 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34905835/Conflict-of-Interest-Index-August-242007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827311/Cover-Mary-Dawson-December-1-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34905856/Mary-Dawson-Commissioner-Ethics-and-Conflict-of-Interests http://www.scribd.com/doc/34905858/Mary-Dawson-December-4-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34905857/Mary-Dawson-Dcember-8-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34905860/Mary-Dawson-December-9-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34905847/Mary-E-Dawson-December-31-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34905817/Conflictof-InterestsJune62008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34905834/Conflict-of-Interest-Compiled-October-52008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828185/To-Peter-VanLoan-MP-February-1-2006 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828183/Peter-Van-Loan-Assistant-1-November-7-07 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34894973/Peter-Van-Loan-3-28-10 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34808676/His-ASSHOLE-Peter-Van-Loan-It-is-the-Principle-of-the-Thing June 4 2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824397/Certified-Government-Conspiracy-Check-Mate Peter Van Loan July 7 2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34826927/Check-Mate Robert Nicholson January 20 2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824148/May-24-2009-Just-May-Go-Down-in-History Dawson Creek http://www.scribd.com/doc/43545449/Dawson-Creek-Dolores-Desperately-Needs-Our-Help May 6 2009 33

http://www.scribd.com/doc/43545304/The-People-Make-a-Stand-in-Dawson-Creek-May-11-2009 May 8 2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824688/Utmost-Importance-May-12-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43545888/This-Document-Dated-May-31-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/43545668/September-Government-Collapse July 9 2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824685/We-Have-a-Date-With-an-Angel-September-16-This-Fall-of-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34826926/Dear-Dolores-Prospective-CDF-Member-in-Training http://www.scribd.com/doc/34826922/Extracted-From-the-Natasha-Dostal-Family-Site http://www.scribd.com/doc/34826914/Kicked-Off-Natasha-May-20-2009-11 Aboriginal http://www.scribd.com/doc/34824267/We-Are-the-People-We-Are-CDF1-CA http://www.scribd.com/doc/34809068/WE-Wrote-Them-a-Letter http://www.scribd.com/doc/34808428/Assembly-of-First-Nations-May-9-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34808663/Dry-Up-Chief-Rain-Storm

34

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Jonathan/Swainger/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34895058/Jonathan-Swainger-August-24-2009 Jonathan on GLIST but refuses to respond http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828376/This-Column-Was-Published-in-the-North-Shore-News-on-Sept 13 2000 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828347/Leo-Knight-December-28-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34905203/Commission-RCMP-Complaints-Dec-27-2007

December 10 2009 http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/235930717-paul-kennedy-and-robert-dziejanski--the-rcmp-s-william-elliott-and-more

35

On November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP for refusing to investigate government organized crime that immediately forwarded to the RCMP to investigate themselves. On September 3 2008 RCMP District Commander of the GTA Superintendent Robert Davis signed the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition stating although I had provided hundreds of pages of documents chose not to look at them taking a diversionary out the back door path finding the RCMP innocent of refusing to investigate government organized crime corruption and conspiracy while he himself admitted he refused to look at the evidence. September 23, 25 2008 I filed with the Commission for a review and on or about December 24 chair Paul Kennedy articulated a fine bundle of crap agreeing with the RCMP Superintended making note they with same boss are independent of the RCMP

December 10 2009 http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/235930717-paul-kennedy-and-robert-dziejanski--the-rcmp-s-william-elliott-and-more

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828181/Many-Government-September-252006 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34827563/Government-Correspondence-Compiled-Sept-12007

http://www.scribd.com/doc/48775531/Mongrel-1 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34808711/JCU-RAP-Jesus-Confucius-United-Revelations-Actuate-PowerSeptember-1-2008

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34796243/Freedom-of-Information-Request-Registered-Mail October 15 2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34895748/Ontario-Government-Not-Responsible-to-Cover-Up-This-One Oct 21 2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34895181/Access-to-Information Dec. 5 09 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34796400/RCMP-Sgt-Kent-Swim-Registered-Mail-Receipt-December-16-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34796381/RCMP-Sgt-Kent-Swim-December-29-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34895454/Save-Your-Life-Today-and-Mine-Please-1-2-10 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34796039/Access-to-Information-Commissioner-1-14-10 36

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34796115/Addendum-Commissioner-Information-1-14-10 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34897029/Constitution-the-Authority-Establishment-the-Asshole-1-28-10 Eric Murphy http://www.scribd.com/doc/34894343/Their-Insanity-Gave-Them-Up-January-30-2010 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34897837/Charlatan-s-Intelligence-Collectively-Dwarfed-by-a-Single-Toad 2/13/10 Eric Murphy http://www.scribd.com/doc/34895732/So-am-I-to-Die-2-16-10 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34796143/Fax-Complaint-2-17-10-Eric-Murphy-Access-to-Information-Act http://www.scribd.com/doc/34897625/CDF-Offers-Mulroney-Way-Out 2/21/10 Eric Murphy http://www.scribd.com/doc/34796341/Now-if-I-Find-a-Stamp-I-Can-Save-the-World The document 'Now if I Find a Stamp I Can Save the World' has been deleted http://www.scribd.com/doc/47499315/Now-if-I-Find-a-Stamp-I-Can-Save-the-World-Nov-6-09 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34895797/Public-Notice-Evil-is-Dead March 1 2010 Fax Eric Murphy http://www.scribd.com/doc/34895476/The-Witch-is-Dead-March-1-2010 Eric Murphy Client Liaison Officer Office of the Information Commissioner http://www.scribd.com/doc/34828539/The-RCMP-Staff-Sgt-R-B-MacAdam-Report-9-Month-NonInvestigation May 17 2010 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34900804/Information-Commissioner-4-1-10 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34898593/When-Your-Are-Corrupt-and-Trapped-What-Can-You-Do Carmen Garrett Office Information Commissioner April 1 2010

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34894582/Who-in-Hell-is-the-Holy-Father http://www.scribd.com/doc/34898364/Protest-Ants-Created-to-Protest-Catholics-Now-Have-the-Ammunitionbut-the-Stuff-Still-to-Be-Seen March 11 2010

37