Você está na página 1de 39

COMPONENT PREPARATION SERVICES

Pure Tin Plated Leads


Problems and Mitigation

Joe Zaccari
Military Programs Manager
Corfin Industries LLC
603-893-9900 phone
jzaccari@corfin.com
www.corfin.com
Presentation Outline :

 Reliability problems associated with pure tin plated leads:


– Whiskers
 Factors in whisker development
– Stress
– Intermetallic formation
– Abrasion of the plating
 Survey of documented failures
 Examples of tin whisker growth
– Solderability
 Poor solder joint quality
– Oxidation
– Reflow characteristics

 Potential solutions to whiskering and solderability problems on Pure Tin Plated


component leads:
– Use as is (case-by-case evaluation)
– Matte plating
– Arc with high voltage
– Conformal coat
– Hot solder dip

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


COMPONENT PREPARATION SERVICES

Whiskers
Stress
Intermetallic Formation
Abrasion of Plating
Factors in Whisker Development

 Plating Chemistry/Process
– Electroplating Current Density
 Higher Current Density --> Higher Residual Stress
– Tin Grain Size and Shape
 Submicron Grains
 “Matte” vs. “Bright” Finish
– Use of “Brighteners” and Presence of Impurities
– Plating Thickness
 >0.5 µm and <8 µm more prone
– Alloy composition
 Pure Sn, Sn-Cu, Sn-Bi, and rarely Sn-Pb
 Substrate (Including Base Metal and Barrier Plating
Layers)
– Material (Copper, Brass, Nickel, others)
– Substrate Preparation (Stamped, Formed, Annealed)

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Factors in Whisker Development

 Intermetallic Compound (IMC) Formation


 • Environmental Stresses
– Temperature (50°C More Favorable)
– Temperature Shock/cycling (CTE Mismatches)
– Humidity (High RH Observed to Increase
Whiskering)
– Applied Pressure (Torque on Fasteners)

It is important to note however that:


Many Experiments Show Contradictory Results
For These Factors
G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002
“Public Domain” Whisker Related
Failures
 Military
– F-15
– Missile programs
 Phoenix
 Patriot Missile II
 Other
 Space
– Satellites
 Galaxy IV
 Galaxy VII
 Solidaridad I
 Other
 Medical
– Heart Pacemaker
 Energy
– Nuclear Regulatory Commission
G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002
Examples of Whiskers

Relay Leads

"Photo courtesy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker "

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Examples of Whiskers

Standard Dual In-Line Package (DIP) IC, Leads are copper based with
"pure matte tin plated finish" (confirmed via SEM/EDS).

"Photos courtesy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker "

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Examples of Whiskers

Conformal Coat (Polyurethane)


Whiskers Growing Beneath Whisker Growing Thru
2 mil Thick Coating ~0.25 mil Thick Coating

T in W h is ke rs : A ttrib u te s a n d M itig a tio n

"Photos courtesy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center J a y B ru s s e


Q S S G ro u p , In c . @ N A S A G o d d a rd
(http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/experiment/exp2/ ). " P re se n tatio n to : C a p a c ito r a nd R e s is to r T e ch n o lo g y S ym p o s iu m
2002
N e w O rle a n s , L A M a rc h 2 6 , 2 0 0 2

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


COMPONENT PREPARATION SERVICES

Solderability Issues

Oxidation
Reflow
How Tin Plated lead forming differs
from Solder Coating
 Lead Form After Plating
– Defects such as, poor solder joint quality and
degraded long-term reliability can result from
forming the leads after the plating has been applied.
– Exposed base material at the device “toe” when the
leads are trimmed to length.
 Toe fillet quality
– Micro-cracks in the plating.
 Oxidation of lead surface.

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Potential Source of Oxidation

Pre- Plated Lead Frame Tie Bars Removed

Exposed base metal

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Potential Source of Oxidation

Exposed Base Metal

X-Ray EDS Analysis


G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002
Potential Oxidation

Micro Cracks in Plating

Exposed
Base Metal
Formed Lead

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Potential Oxidation

12,000x
Magnification

3,000x
Magnification
BSE Image

Plating Flaking 12,000x


Magnification
BSE Image
Formed Lead

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


COMPONENT PREPARATION SERVICES

Mitigation Strategies
Use as is (case-by-case evaluation)
Arc with high voltage
Matte plating
Conformal coat
Hot solder dip
Mitigation Strategies

 Use as is
– Assumptions required
 Arc w/ high voltage
– Components may not survive
– Subjective process
 Matte plating
– Eliminates one potential problem but evidence
exists that whiskers occur in all tin and tin alloy
plated finishes.
– Matte plating is still susceptible to oxidation.
 Conformal coat
– Shown to be ineffective in some cases

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Mitigation Strategies

 Use as is
– When a case-by-case assessment is used some
level of assumptions required.
 No ability to simulate assembly and operation
environmental factors for test purposes.
 Down stream alteration of operational parameters would be
problematic.
– Assumption is too subjective for high reliability
applications.

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Mitigation Strategies

 Conformal coat
– Shown to be ineffective in some cases
– Difficult to determine acceptable application
 Are spaces between fine pitch leads filled?

T in W h is k e rs : A ttrib u te s a n d M itig a tio n


J a y B ru s s e
Q S S G r o u p , In c . @ N A S A G o d d a r d
P re s e n ta tio n to : C a p a c ito r a n d R e s is to r T e c h n o lo g y S y m p o s iu m
2002
N e w O rle a n s , L A M a rc h 2 6 , 2 0 0 2

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Mitigation Strategies

 Matte plating
– Evidence exists that whiskers occur in all tin and tin
alloy plated finishes.
 Strict process control required.
– How to establish “out of control” parameters
 Matte plating is still susceptible to oxidation.

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Mitigation Strategies

 Arc w/ high voltage


– Potential for unintended damage to circuitry
 Potential for immediate damage to circuitry
 Latent damage potential
– Subjective process
 Voltage?
 Duration?

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Mitigation Strategies

 Hot Solder Dipping


– Users may consider hot solder dipping of tin plated
leads (surfaces) using a Sn/Pb based solder.
– This process will help reduce whisker formation by:
 Relieving stress in the tin layer through reflow
 The addition of an alloying element (Pb).

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Hot Solder Dip
Challenges and Successes
 Differences between Pure Tin Plated and Solder Coated component lead
finishes
– Lead Finish
 Composition
 Thickness
 Shelf life
– Lead forming
 Hot solder dip process characteristics and capabilities
– Lead pitch/count
 Manual vs. robotic handling
– Control of Insertion/removal :
 Rate
 Angle
– Reduction of abrasion and induced stress
 Dynamic vs. static solder
 Nitrogen blanketing
– Temperatures and dwell times
– Percentage of lead covered
– Package size/material/construction
 Environmental Impact of Hot Solder Dip
– Hazardous waste

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Tin Plated vs. Solder Coated Lead
Finishes
 Tin Plating vs. Hot Solder Dip
– Hot Solder Dipping is performed in a molten bath
 No separation of tin/lead (Sn/Pb) occurs during the Solder
Coating process.
 Results in a homogeneous and dense lead finish.
– An pure tin coating has a specific crystalline-
structure:
 Prone to Tin Whisker growth
 Possibly of micro-cracks
 “Special” chemicals introduced to affect finish appearance.

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Tin Plated vs. Solder Coated Lead
Finishes
 Tin Plated coatings need added ingredients
within the electrolytic bath to get a proper
coating with specific optical and mechanical
characteristics.
– If bright and shiny surfaces are required, the
electroplated coating tends to be brittle in
comparison to hot-dipped coatings.
 As there are no chemical additives, Solder
Dipped surfaces have little to no out-gasing,
bubbling or separation tendencies in higher
temperature ranges.

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Tin Plated vs. Solder Coated Lead
Finishes
 Hot Solder Dip Lead Finish Characteristics
– The composition of the Solder Coating material
exactly matches the solder bath composition.
 I.e., if 63% tin (Sn) 37% lead (Pb) is used, you will find
exactly this 63 / 37 combination on the Dipped lead.
– Solder coating composition can be matched to
solder paste used in assembly:
 During re-flow, both melt at the same temperature and
provide a better solder joint.

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Tin Plated vs. Solder Coated Lead
Finishes
 Hot Solder Dip Lead Finish Characteristics
– Lead finish volume
 The volume of solder on a hot solder dip lead is greater
than that which can be achieved through plating.
– Solder dipped leads typically have >200µ inches of solder
coating vs. as little as 50µ inches for plating
– Benefit: during re-flow, a greater coverage of the foot, toe,
and heel typically occurs.
– Inter-metallic Development
 Set up from the very beginning.
 Benefit: very good bonding between the core material and
the Solder Coating.

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Tin Plated vs. Solder Coated Lead
Finishes
 Lead Finish Characteristics
– Shelf life
 Typically two years or more, for a post-lead form, hot
solder dipped component.
– This is the result of a relatively thick, homogeneous coating.
– This shelf life can be shorter if the leads are solder dipped
prior to being trimmed and formed.
 Shelf life for a pre-lead form, Solder Dipped component is
typically a year or less.
– This is primarily the result of a base metal exposure at the
foot, resulting in poor toe fillets.
 Shelf life for a tin plated component is typically a year or
less, due to oxidation.
– This can account for PCB de-wetting problems during re-flow.

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Hot Solder Dip
Challenges and Successes
 Solder dipping formed leads:
– Problems with “hand dipping” formed leads
.........

Bridging

Icicles

Solder Build-up

Solder Build-up

Solder Build-up

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Hot Solder Dip
Challenges and Successes
 Hot-Solder dipping
– Hot-tin dipped parts should come from controlled
production lines.
 While the very process of applying a molten layer
minimizes internal stresses, coating application must be
uniform in thickness.
 Hot Solder Dipped parts are still prone to abrasion and
surface compressive stresses during handling.
– Hands free processing greatly reduces this risk.
– The effectiveness of hot solder dipping is limited to
those surfaces that can be safely subjected to a hot
dipping process without introducing thermal
damage.
 For this reason, solder dipping is frequently limited to areas
no closer than 10 to 50 mils from the component body
where glass to metal seals are used.
G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002
Current Robotic Lead Finish
System Capabilities
 Solder dipping formed leads:
– Keys for success
 Nitrogen atmosphere
– The solder pot is equipped with an inert gas enclosure
around the solder wave, with stainless steel gas diffusers that
provide a non-turbulent protective gas cover over the wave.
– The controlled atmosphere reduces dross formation on the
solder wave, promotes wetting and ensures uniform solder
coverage of the component leads.
– The process of solder coating component leads is greatly
enhanced by the inerting process, with the virtual elimination
of icicles and flags as surface tension is greatly decreased..
– A stainless steel shroud that covers the rear of the solder pot,
including the pump area, is injected with inert gas to reduce
the formation of dross and black powder from the pump
shaft.

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Current Robotic Lead Finish
System Capabilities
 Solder dipping formed leads:
– Keys for success
 Control of insertion and removal speed & angle
– Viscosity and surface tension effects on adjacent leads
– Control of solder wicking onto lead
– Control of solder run off

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Current Robotic Lead Finish
System Capabilities
 Solder dipping formed leads:
– Keys for success
 Dynamic solder wave
– Solder pot is designed to draw solder from the base of the
pot, minimizing the possibility of recirculating dross through
the wave.
– The pot has its own thermally protected D.C. motor driven
pump which provides for precise wave height control

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Current Robotic Lead Finish
System Capabilities
 Component Packages
– Plastic, Tinning up to package
 SOT
 SOIC
 TSOP, TSSOP
 QFP
– Ceramic packages
 LCC
 Flat packs
 Quad packs
– Quad pack lead counts up to 442
 2” by 4” Ceramic Hybrid packages
– Metal cans/Hybrid packages, tinning to within 0.010
inch of package
 Component bases as well as leads can be solder coated
G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002
Current Robotic Lead Finish
System Capabilities
 Component Leads
– Straight lead TAB devices
 Lead width 0.003 in.
 Lead spacing 0.015 in.
– Gull wing flat pack and quad packs
 Lead width: 0.06 - 0.23 mm
 Lead pitch: 0.4mm
 Lead thickness: 0.05 - .015mm
– Hybrid packages
 Lead diameter: 0.01”

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Current Robotic Lead Finish
System Capabilities
Pitch
0.4 (.015) 0.5 (.020) 0.64(.025)

Width
0.006 X X

0.13 X X X

0.19 X

0.23 X X X

0.3 X X

Dimensions are in millimeters (inches)

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Current Robotic Lead Finish
System Capabilities
 Solder dipping formed leads:

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Hot Solder Dip
Challenges and Successes

 Environmental Impact
– Hazardous waste
 Process water is only waste product
– Lead levels in waste water is many time below levels
allowable into municipal sewer systems.
– Hazardous waste generation is in the “household”
classification.
– All other materials are recycled
 Solder ( tin & lead)

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002


Conclusion

 Pure tin-plated component leads are


susceptible to whisker formation
 Failures due to tin whiskers are a real problem.
 Hot solder dip is a viable solution to tin whisker
problems on electronic components regardless
of lead dimensions.

G-12 Meeting September 10, 2002

Você também pode gostar