Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
4847208) Mark Elmore (admitted pro hac vice) HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP 30 Rockefeller Plaza, 26th Floor New York, New York 10112 Telephone: (212) 659-7300 Facsimile: (212) 918-8989 Attorneys for Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, N.A. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: INNKEEPERS USA TRUST, et al., Debtors. ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 11 Case No. 10-13800 (SCC) Jointly Administered
OBJECTION OF MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES TO THE FIRST INTERIM APPLICATION OF MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP AS COUNSEL FOR THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES INCURRED FOR THE PERIOD JULY 28, 2010 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2010 Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, N.A. (Midland)1 hereby files this Objection of Midland Loan Services (the Objection) to the First Interim Application of Morrison & Foerster LLP (Morrison Foerster) as Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the Committee) for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses
Midland is the special servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 13, 2007 (the Special Servicing Agreement) for that certain secured loan in the amount of not less than $825,402,542 plus interest, costs and fees (the Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan) owed by certain of the above captioned Debtors. The Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan is secured by cross-collateralized and crossdefaulted first priority mortgages, liens and security interests on forty-five (45) hotel properties and their contents and assets related thereto (collectively, the Midland Properties) and the other collateral, including all cash collateral as such term has meaning under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, generated by the Midland Debtors hotel and business operations with respect to the Midland Properties (the Midland Cash Collateral), as set forth in the Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan Agreement.
D-1930352
Incurred for the Period July 28, 2010 Through November 30, 2010 (the First Interim Fee Application),2 and in support thereof, respectfully represents as follows: Background 1. On August 12, 2010, the Court entered its Order Authorizing the Establishment of
Procedures for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses for Professionals and Official Committee Members (the Fee Procedures Order).3 The Fee Procedures Order provides that nothing in this Order shall affect in any way any special servicers right to object to the use of its cash collateral to fund all or part of the fees and expenses of professionals compensated from the Debtors bankruptcy estates in monthly, interim, or final fee requests nor rule on the appropriateness of such cash collateral use or any entities rights with respect thereto. Fee Procedures Order at p. 7, 10. 2. On January 14, 2011, Morrison Foerster filed its First Interim Fee Application.
Morrison Foerster has previously filed monthly fee applications for August, September, October, and November of 2010.4 Midland has filed objections (the Midland Objections) to all four of the Morrison Foerster monthly fee applications.5 3. The use of Midlands Cash Collateral is governed by the Final Order Authorizing
the Debtors to (i) Use the Adequate Protection Parties Cash Collateral and (ii) Provide Adequate Protection to the Adequate Protection Parties Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 361, 362, and 363 dated September 2, 2010 (as amended, the Final Cash Collateral Order).6 The Final Cash Collateral Order establishes, among other things, a maximum amount that may be spent from
2 3 4 5 6
Docket No. 825. Docket No. 189. Docket Nos. 505, 719, 742, and 781, respectively. Docket Nos. 584, 771, 770, and 841. Docket No. 402.
2
D-1930352
Cash Collateral to investigate the Loan Obligations and the Prepetition Collateral and/or a potential Challenge (as those terms are defined in the Final Cash Collateral Order) of $150,000 (the Lien Review Cap). Objection 4. Midland objects to the payment of fees and expenses in the amounts requested in
the First Interim Fee Application for the reasons more fully stated in the Midland Objections attached hereto as Exhibits 1, 2, 3, and 4. 5. The Lien Review Cap limits the amounts payable to Morrison Foerster for the
categories of time designated as Prepetition Lien Review, 2007 Transaction Investigation, and Lease / Real Estate Analysis notwithstanding Morrison Foersters request to exclude the $284,175.25 in fees charged to matters subject to the Lien Review Cap.7 The most recent extension of the Challenge Period8 under the Final Cash Collateral Order makes it clear that the 2007 Transaction Investigation is also directed at Midland. At best, it is inconsistent to argue that the limitation does not apply in compensation matters but applies when preserving potential causes of action. Either the 2007 Transaction Investigation is also aimed at lenders or it is not. If it is not directed at lenders, then the Challenge Period should terminate and the amounts requested might be funded from Cash Collateral. The termination of the Challenge Period is the only effective way to assure that lenders are no longer the subject of the investigation. Since the Committee is unlikely to adopt that position, the Lien Review Cap must remain intact.9
In the First Interim Fee Application, Morrison Foerster incorrectly argues that fees for services categorized as 2007 Transaction Investigation ($186,454.00) and Lease / Real Estate Analysis ($97,721.25) are not subject to the Lien Review Cap. The Challenge Period was extended pursuant to the Third Stipulation and Order Regarding Further Modification of the Committees Challenge Deadline in the Cash Collateral Order [Docket No. 875]. If funds are available from sources other than Cash Collateral from which those fees can be paid, the Committee should identify the same.
3
D-1930352
6.
As noted in 33-34 of the First Interim Fee Application, Midland and Morrison
Foerster resolved certain mathematical calculations to confirm that the complete allocation of the $150,000 of Cash Collateral has been fully disbursed and, even if the First Interim Fee Application is granted and additional fees approved for the Prepetition Lien Review, the fees for those tasks may not be paid from Cash Collateral.10 7. Additionally, Midland concurs in and joins the Objection of the United States
Trustee to First Interim Applications For Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses.11 Local Rule 9013-1(a) 8. This pleading, together with the documents attached hereto, includes citations to
the applicable rules and statutory authorities upon which relief requested herein is predicated and a discussion of their application to this pleading. pleading satisfies Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1(a). WHEREFORE, Midland respectfully requests that the Court enter an order (i) sustaining this Objection; (ii) substantially reducing the compensation requested under the First Interim Fee Application; and (iii) granting Midland such other and further relief as is equitable and just. Accordingly, Midland submits that this
For clarity, the amounts paid for fees incurred in October 2010 for the matters in question (and which resulted in a total of $150,000 of Cash Collateral being funded) were as follows: 17 22 23
11
10
Lease/Real Estate Analysis $5,328.37 2007 Transx. Invest. $29,992.69 Prepetition Lien Review $18,140.36
D-1930352
Dated:
/s/ John D. Penn Lenard M. Parkins (NY Bar #4579124) Mark Elmore (admitted pro hac vice) 30 Rockefeller Plaza, 26th Floor New York, New York 10112 Telephone No.: (212) 659-7300 Facsimile No.: (212) 884-8211 - and John D. Penn (NY Bar # 4847208) Haynes and Boone, LLP 201 Main Street, Suite 2200 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Telephone No.: (817) 347-6610 Facsimile No.: (817) 348-2300 ATTORNEYS FOR MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, N.A.
D-1930352
EXHIBIT 1
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 26th Floor New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 659-7300 Facsimile: (212) 918-8989 Lenard M. Parkins (NY Bar #4579124) John D. Penn (NY Bar # 4847208) Mark Elmore (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Midland Loan Services, Inc. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: INNKEEPERS USA TRUST, et al., Debtors. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 11 Case No. 10-13800 (SCC) Jointly Administered
MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, INC.S LIMITED OBJECTION TO THE MONTHLY APPLICATION OF MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP FOR COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AS ATTORNEYS FOR THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 28, 2010 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2010 Midland Loan Services, Inc. (Midland),1 hereby files its Limited Objection (the Objection) to the Monthly Application of Morrison & Foerster LLP for Compensation for Services and Reimbursement of Expenses as Attorneys for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors for the Period from July 28, 2010 through August 31, 2010 (the Committee Fee Request) and respectfully represents: BACKGROUND
Midland is the special servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 13, 2007 (the Special Servicing Agreement) for that certain secured loan in the amount of not less than $825,402,542 plus interest, costs and fees (the Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan) owed by certain of the above captioned Debtors.
D1894163
Page 1 of 6
1.
On August 31, 2010, the Court entered its Order Authorizing the Establishment of
Procedures for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses for Professionals and Official Committee Members (the Fee Procedures Order). Pursuant to the Fee Procedures Order, Notice Parties must file objections to the Committee Fee Request or before October 20, 2010, which is at least twenty (20) days after service of the monthly fee request.2 2. On September 27, 2010, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the
Committee) filed the Committee Fee Request seeking authorization of $562,982.50 in fees and $6,369.85 in expenses, and corresponding payment of 80% of the fees and 100% of the expenses. 3. Based on the information provided by the Debtors in the Schedules of Assets and
Liabilities filed in these cases as well as supplemental information provided to financial advisors, the current estimate of the amount of allowable general unsecured trade debt owed by the Debtors appears to be approximately $6.6 million. See Objection of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors to the Motion of the Ad Hoc Committee of Preferred Shareholders for an Order Directing the Appointment of an Examiner Pursuant to Section 1104(c)(1)-(2) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket Entry #263] at p. 2 (challenging whether the Ad Hoc Committee of Preferred Shareholders had established that the Debtors fixed, liquidated, unsecured debts exceed $5,000,000). This amount does not account for the reductions that are likely to occur as a result of allowed claims for reclamation or administrative expense claims under 11 U.S.C. 503(b)(9), which will reduce the amount even further. This estimate also does not include potential deficiency claims from secured creditor Representatives (as described in the Final Cash Collateral Order entered in these cases) that are represented by their own counsel.
D1894163
Page 2 of 6
OBJECTIONS 4. Midland objects to the use of its cash collateral for payment of any fees incurred
by the Committee in connection with the Marriott Dispute (as defined below). Midland also objects to the improper categorization of any fees related to the investigation of Midlands liens under the category Lease/Real Estate Analysis. A. 5. Midland Objects to Payment of the Marriott Dispute Fees from its Collateral On August 26, 2010, the Court entered the Stipulation Between Innkeepers USA
Trust and Marriott International, Inc. and Order Approving Settlement of Marriotts Motion for Limited Modification of the Automatic Stay and Debtors Motion to Assume the Troy Central Franchise Agreement (the Marriott Stipulation) resolving certain disputes between the Debtors and Marriott International, Inc. (the Marriott Dispute) in which the Debtors agreed to pay the reasonable expenses, attorneys fees and costs incurred by Marriott International, Inc (the Marriott Fees). The Marriott Stipulation expressly provides that the Debtors payment of the Marriott Fees shall be paid out of Lehman ALI Inc.s cash collateral. Marriott Stipulation at 3, 6. Accordingly, Midlands cash collateral was not the source of payment for the Marriott Fees. 6. From a review of the Committee Fee Request, the Committee incurred no less
than $32,365 in fees related to the Marriott Dispute.3 As previously argued to the Court, the Midland Debtors received no benefit from the resolution of the Marriott Dispute.4 This principle is embodied in the Marriott Stipulation whereby all of the Marriott Fees had to be paid from
The $32,365 figure was provided by counsel for the Committee. The Midland Debtors are the above referenced debtors that are obligors under the Fixed Rate
Mortgage Loan.
D1894163
Page 3 of 6
Lehman ALI, Inc.s cash collateral. The same principle should apply with respect to payment of the Committees fees incurred in the Marriott Dispute. The Midland Debtors should not fund the payment of the Committees fees incurred in the Marriott Dispute. B. 7. Midland Objects to the Improper Categorization of Fees The Committee Fee Request includes a request for fees in the amount of $66,325
under the category Lease/Real Estate Analysis. It appears that a substantial portion of the time entries in this category relate to the investigation and review of the loan documents and collateral files for the Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan. Additionally, the Committee Fee Request includes fees in the amount of $437.50 under the category Prepetition Lien Review. Because the Final Cash Collateral Order provides a budgeted $150,000 for lien review by the Committee, Midland objects to the improper categorization of fees incurred in connection with the review of the Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan under the category Lease/Real Estate Analysis. The amounts must be placed into the proper category so they can be tracked and compared to the budget in the Final Cash Collateral Order. The Committee should be required to segregate entries relating to the review of the loan documents and collateral files from entries properly associated with Lease/Real Estate Analysis. 8. It cannot be overlooked that the Committee decided that it would not object to the
proposed Plan Support Agreement that, had it been approved, would have limited the total distribution to unsecured creditors to $500,000 (excluding potential deficiency claims) unless the Debtors elected to risk the termination of the use of the cash collateral from the Floating Rate Collateral (and potentially the loss of the Floating Rate Collateral). Midland reserves its right to object to the overall reasonableness of the compensation being requested for all of the Committees professionals.
D1894163
Page 4 of 6
9.
Finally, as raised previously in this case, Midland objects to the use of its cash
collateral for any activities that are contrary to Midlands interests. In a typical carve-out situation, a debtor (or other estate professional) is not entitled to use a secured creditors cash collateral to finance efforts to challenge a secured lenders claims or interests in its collateral or to support actions taken against the secured lender. Accordingly, the Committee and any professionals it employs, as estate professionals, cannot use Midlands collateral to advocate a challenge to Midlands position. Local Rule 9013-1(a) 10. This pleading includes citations to the applicable rules and statutory authorities
upon which the relief requested herein is predicated and a discussion of their application to this pleading. Accordingly, Midland submits that this pleading satisfies Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1(a).
D1894163
Page 5 of 6
CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, premises considered, Midland respectfully requests that this Court enter an order i) sustaining the Objection; ii) providing that any fees incurred in connection with the Marriott Dispute not be allocated to the Midland Debtors; iii) requiring the Committee to properly categorize its fee requests; and iv) granting such other relief as is necessary or appropriate.
Dated:
/s/ John D. Penn Lenard M. Parkins (NY Bar #4579124) Mark Elmore (admitted pro hac vice) 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 26th Floor New York, NY 10020-1007 Telephone No.: (212) 659-7300 Facsimile No.: (212) 884-8211 - and John D. Penn, Esq. (NY Bar # 4847208) Haynes and Boone, LLP 201 Main Street, Suite 2200 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Telephone No.: (817) 347-6610 Facsimile No.: (817) 348-2300 ATTORNEYS FOR MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, INC.
D1894163
Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT 2
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 26th Floor New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 659-7300 Facsimile: (212) 918-8989 Lenard M. Parkins (NY Bar #4579124) John D. Penn (NY Bar # 4847208) Mark Elmore (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Midland Loan Services, Inc. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: INNKEEPERS USA TRUST, et al., Debtors. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 11 Case No. 10-13800 (SCC) Jointly Administered
MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, INC.S LIMITED OBJECTION TO THE MONTHLY APPLICATION OF MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP FOR COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AS ATTORNEYS FOR THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 Midland Loan Services, Inc. (Midland),1 hereby files its Limited Objection (the Objection) to the Monthly Application of Morrison & Foerster LLP for Compensation for Services and Reimbursement of Expenses as Attorneys for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors for the Period from September 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010 (the Committee Fee Request) and respectfully represents: BACKGROUND
Midland is the special servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 13, 2007 (the Special Servicing Agreement) for that certain secured loan in the amount of not less than $825,402,542 plus interest, costs and fees (the Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan) owed by certain of the above captioned Debtors.
F-287459
Page 1 of 36
1.
On August 31, 2010, the Court entered its Order Authorizing the Establishment of
Procedures for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses for Professionals and Official Committee Members (the Fee Procedures Order). Pursuant to the Fee Procedures Order, Notice Parties must file objections to the Committee Fee Request or before October 20, 2010, which is at least twenty (20) days after service of the monthly fee request.2 2. On November 18, 2010, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the
Committee) filed the Committee Fee Request seeking approval of $431,587.85 in fees and $18,454.55 in expenses, and corresponding payment of 80% of the fees and 100% of the expenses. 3. Based on the information provided by the Debtors in the Schedules of Assets and
Liabilities filed in these cases as well as supplemental information provided to financial advisors, the current estimate of the amount of allowable general unsecured trade debt owed by the Debtors appears to be relatively insignificant. The amount will likely to be further reduced as a result of allowed claims for reclamation or administrative expense claims under 11 U.S.C. 503(b)(9), which will reduce the amount even further. This estimate also does not include potential deficiency claims from secured creditor Representatives (as described in the Final Cash Collateral Order entered in these cases) that are represented by their own counsel. OBJECTIONS 4. The fees and expenses being incurred by the Committee should be carefully
reviewed since they continue to mount into the range where they could culminate in an amount equal to a substantial portion of the trade claims that might be allowed in these cases. The trade claims is the appropriate metric for the Committee since the interest of any unsecured deficiency
F-287459
Page 2 of 36
claimholders are already represented by counsel and there have been no material rejection damage claims in these cases. Even if rejection damage claims emerged, each of the franchisors of the Debtors hotel properties is represented by counsel as well. 5. It appears that the Debtors were operating their businesses and managing their
payables in the ordinary course of their businesses before these cases were filed. At any given time, approximately one month of payables would have been in the Debtors system awaiting processing and payment. This limited number of claims embodies the Committees actual constituents. Notwithstanding a fairly limited mandate, the Committee has incurred and
continues to incur substantial obligations for professional fees. 6. following: Fees & Expenses Morrison & Foerster Jefferies & Co. TOTAL Through Aug. 2010 $569,352.35 $133,064.52 $702,416.87 Through Sept. 2010 $450,042.40 $127,308.99 $577,351.39 TOTAL $1,019,394.75 $260,373.51 $1,279,768.26 The fees and expensed charged by the Committees professionals indicate the
Before this Limited Objection was filed, counsel for the Committee filed a notice regarding its fees and expenses for October. The updated totals are below. Fees & Expenses Morrison & Foerster Jefferies & Co. TOTAL Through Sept. 2010 $1,019,394.75 $260,373.51 $1,279,768.26 Oct. 20103 $196,941.14 $125,000 $321,941.14 TOTAL $1,216,335.89 $385,373.51 $1,601,709.40
If the fees and expenses continued at $400,000 per month through November and December (which reflects the historical burn rate to date), by December 31, the Committees
The amount reflected for Jefferies represents the monthly fee to Jefferies for October 2010 and is subject to change when its actual fee request is filed.
F-287459
Page 3 of 36
professionals would have charged over $2.4 million before a plan of reorganization had been filed, negotiated or litigated. Undeniably, the first forty-five days of these cases were very active. However, it is very likely that the Committees professionals will have charged fees and expenses equal to almost five times the amount set aside for all unsecured claims in the Plan Support Agreement that the Committee elected not to oppose. Once the amount of the trade claims is established, it might reveal the anomaly that the Committees professional fees and expenses equaled or exceeded the amount of the claims of the constituents it represents as well as a multiple of the distributions to its constituents. 7. One example of billing issues can be found in these entries that describe the first
meeting of creditors a meeting where there was no opening statement by the Debtors and no creditor asked a single question of the Debtors representatives. A meeting with that amount of engagement and interaction that concluded in moments resulted in an hour of billed time. Date
14-Sep-2010 14-Sep-2010
Services
Attend Debtors' Section 341 meeting of creditors (.2); prepare summary regarding same (.7). Review details of Section 341 meeting of creditors.
Hours
0.90 0.10
Value (Fee)
387.00 62.50
TOTAL
1.00
$ 449.50
8.
Other areas of concern include the amounts charged in connection with the
request by certain preferred shareholders of Innkeepers USA Trust for the appointment of an official equity committee or an examiner. The should be viewed in connection with the sums charged by counsel for the Debtors since the Debtors estates (and the Lenders cash collateral) should not be charged with duplicate fees and expenses to create what is likely to have been substantially similar work product. It appears that the fees and expenses charged by counsel for the Committee and those charged by counsel for the Debtors may have a significant amount of
F-287459
Page 4 of 36
overlap. The attached table indicates that counsel for the Committee charged at least $83,563.00 in relation to the equity committee / examiner issues. Payment beyond the initial 80% payment (20% holdback) for these charges should be denied. 9. The Committees request to employ Jefferies & Co (Jefferies) as its financial
advisors, including a substantial transaction fee, represents charges of $63,420.00 as shown on the attached table. The amount charged exceeds a reasonable charge for engaging a financial advisory firm and Jefferies employment was approved only after the request for an excessive transaction fee was eliminated. Payment beyond the initial 80% payment (20% holdback) for these charges should be denied. 10. In addition to the other items discussed herein, the Application includes a
substantial amount of interoffice discussions and conversations. (Specifically, the other items include a substantial amount of discussions and conversations they are not identified as such in the amount noted below.) The total of such is reflected on the attached table listing each such entry indicates a total of $43,425.00. Payment beyond the initial 80% payment (20% holdback) for these charges should be denied. 11. Significantly, the Application shows that as of September 30, the Committee
was exceptionally close to the maximum amount of the Lenders Cash Collateral that could be charged in relation to a Challenge. Over $136,000 of the maximum $150,000 had been charged through September with the charges in October taking the total well beyond the $150,000 limit. Undoubtedly, charges for these items will continue in November and December 2010.
F-287459
Page 5 of 36
12.
Specifically, a Challenge under the Cash Collateral Order would include both
the review of the perfection of the Lenders liens as well as the Committees review of the 2007 Transaction. a. 12 of the Cash Collateral Order states, in pertinent part,
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Cash Collateral and the Carve Out may be used by the Committee to investigate the Loan Obligations and the Prepetition Collateral and/or a potential Challenge (as defined below); provided that no more than $150,000 in the aggregate may be spent from Cash Collateral on such investigations. b. 13 includes the following, is without prejudice to the rights of the
Committee to investigate and challenge any such liens or security interests of the Adequate Protection Parties, or to assert any other claims or causes of action, at law or in equity against any of the Adequate Protection Parties (a Challenge) . . . . 13. The Application (along with the resolution regarding the invoices for August
2010) with the similar application for October reflects the following charges against the $150,000 limit for such reviews: Fees Lease/ RE Analysis 2007 Transx. Invest. Prepetition Loan Review TOTAL August 2010* 16,581.25 $2,216.50 $437.50 $19,235.25 September 2010** 33,762.00 47,977.50 35,632.00 $117,371.50 October 2010** $13,689.00 $74,484.50 $46,604.00 $134,777.50 TOTAL $64,032.25 $124,678.50 $82,673.50 $271,384.25
*The August amounts reflect the interim resolution as noted in the Notice of Resolution, Docket No. 631. **The September and October invoices includes Client Accommodation deduction that is not identified with any specific entry, task or matter.
F-287459
Page 6 of 36
14.
It is clear that the Committee has now exceeded the amount of Cash Collateral
that may be used for this purpose and payments beyond that amount are not authorized uses of Cash Collateral regardless of whether the fees might have otherwise been allowable. Midland objects to allowance and payment of fees and expenses in excess of the limitation established and agreed upon for such Challenge. Since objections to both invoices for the September and October fees and expenses are due simultaneously, Midland objects to payments under either invoices in excess of such limitation. 15. Finally, as raised previously in this case, Midland objects to the use of its cash
collateral for any activities that are contrary to Midlands interests. In a typical carve-out situation, a debtor (or other estate professional) is not entitled to use a secured creditors cash collateral to finance efforts to challenge a secured lenders claims or interests in its collateral or to support actions taken against the secured lender. Accordingly, the Committee and any professionals it employs, as estate professionals, cannot use Midlands collateral to advocate a challenge to Midlands position. Local Rule 9013-1(a) 16. This pleading includes citations to the applicable rules and statutory authorities
upon which the relief requested herein is predicated and a discussion of their application to this pleading. Accordingly, Midland submits that this pleading satisfies Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1(a).
F-287459
Page 7 of 36
CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, premises considered, Midland respectfully requests that this Court enter an order i) sustaining the Objection; ii) providing that any fees incurred in connection with the Marriott Dispute not be allocated to the Midland Debtors; iii) requiring the Committee to properly categorize its fee requests; and iv) granting such other relief as is necessary or appropriate.
Dated:
/s/ John D. Penn Lenard M. Parkins (NY Bar #4579124) Mark Elmore (admitted pro hac vice) 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 26th Floor New York, NY 10020-1007 Telephone No.: (212) 659-7300 Facsimile No.: (212) 884-8211 - and John D. Penn, Esq. (NY Bar # 4847208) Haynes and Boone, LLP 201 Main Street, Suite 2200 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Telephone No.: (817) 347-6610 Facsimile No.: (817) 348-2300 ATTORNEYS FOR MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, INC.
F-287459
Page 8 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-1-10
Engelhardt, Stefan W.
$745.00
1.40
$1,043.00
9-3-10
Richards, Erica J.
$490.00
0.50
$245.00
9-7-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
3.90
$1,677.00
9-7-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625.00
0.20
$125.00
9-8-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
5.00
$2,150.00
9-8-10
Richards, Erica J.
$490.00
4.50
$2,205.00
9-14-10
Guido, Laura
$230.00
0.80
$184.00
F-287459
Page 9 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-14-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750.00
1.40
$1,050.00
9-14-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
5.70
$2,451.00
9-14-10 9-15-10
$625.00 $230.00
0.80 2.10
$500.00 $483.00
9-15-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
5.90
$2,537.00
9-15-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625.00
0.60
$375.00
9-16-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
10.90
$4,687.00
9-16-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625.00
1.90
$1,187.50
9-17-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
8.10
$3,483.00
9-17-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625.00
0.60
$375.00
F-287459
Page 10 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-18-10 9-19-10
$625.00 $625.00
0.70 1.00
$437.50 $625.00
9-20-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
7.60
$3,268.00
9-21-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625.00
0.50
$312.50
9-22-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750.00
1.80
$1,350.00
9-22-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
1.40
$602.00
9-22-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900.00
0.80
$720.00
F-287459
Page 11 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-22-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625.00
1.50
$937.50
9-23-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650.00
1.30
$845.00
9-23-10
Guido, Laura
$230.00
1.90
$437.00
9-23-10
Miller, Brett H.
$875.00
1.50
$1,312.50
9-23-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
4.20
$1,806.00
9-23-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625.00
0.90
$562.50
F-287459
Page 12 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-24-10
Engelhardt, Stefan W.
$745.00
6.40
$4,768.00
9-24-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650.00
0.60
$390.00
9-24-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750.00
2.80
$2,100.00
9-24-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
5.40
$2,322.00
9-24-10
Weatherholtz, Kyle S.
$185.00
1.10
$203.50
9-24-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625.00
0.70
$437.50
9-26-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
2.60
$1,118.00
F-287459
Page 13 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-27-10
Engelhardt, Stefan W.
$745.00
7.60
$5,662.00
9-27-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750.00
1.50
$1,125.00
9-27-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
4.00
$1,720.00
9-28-10 9-28-10
$900.00 $625.00
0.50 0.10
$450.00 $62.50
9-28-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625.00
0.70
$437.50
F-287459
Page 14 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-29-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750.00
3.00
$2,250.00
9-29-10
Miller, Brett H.
$875.00
1.30
$1,137.50
9-29-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
4.60
$1,978.00
F-287459
Page 15 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-29-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625.00
3.70
$2,312.50
9-30-10
Engelhardt, Stefan W.
$745.00
5.00
$3,725.00
9-30-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750.00
4.00
$3,000.00
Total
$83,563.00
F-287459
Page 16 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-1-10
Richards, Erica J.
$490
1.40
$686.00
9-8-10
Richards, Erica J.
$490
0.60
$294.00
9-8-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.70
$437.50
9-9-10
Guido, Laura
$230
0.80
$184.00
9-9-10
Richards, Erica J.
$490
0.60
$294.00
9-15-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.60
$450.00
9-22-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.30
$270.00
9-22-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.40
$250.00
9-23-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
2.00
$1,500.00
F-287459
Page 17 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-23-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
1.80
$1,125.00
9-24-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.60
$390.00
9-24-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.50
$325.00
9-24-10
Keeton, Douglas
$195
0.80
$156.00
9-24-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
1.60
$1,200.00
9-24-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
1.00
$590.00
9-24-10
Richards, Erica J.
$490
7.20
$3,528.00
9-24-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.20
$125.00
9-25-10
Richards, Erica J.
$490
6.90
$3,381.00
F-287459
Page 18 of 36
Date
9-26-10
Timekeeper
Galante, Paul A.
Rate
$650
Hours
2.00
Fee
$1,300.00
9-26-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
1.00
$750.00
9-26-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430
1.00
$430.00
9-26-10
Richards, Erica J.
$490
3.60
$1,764.00
9-26-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
1.10
$687.50
9-27-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
2.10
$1,365.00
9-27-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
2.10
$1,575.00
9-27-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430
0.70
$301.00
9-27-10
Richards, Erica J.
$490
3.60
$1,764.00
9-27-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
1.60
$1,000.00
F-287459
Page 19 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-28-10
Engelhardt, Stefan W.
$745
8.80
$6,556.00
9-28-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
1.10
$715.00
9-28-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.30
$195.00
9-28-10 9-28-10
$650 $230
0.30 2.65
$195.00 $609.50
9-28-10
Guido, Laura
$230
3.00
$690.00
9-28-10
Guido, Laura
$230
0.40
$92.00
9-28-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
4.10
$3,075.00
9-28-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
4.20
$2,478.00
F-287459
Page 20 of 36
Date
9-28-10
Timekeeper
Richards, Erica J.
Rate
$490
Hours
7.80
Fee
$3,822.00
9-28-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
4.10
$2,562.50
Wishnew, Jordan A. Weatherholtz, Kyle S. Galante, Paul A. Guido, Laura Guido, Laura Guido, Laura
9-29-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
2.70
$2,025.00
F-287459
Page 21 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-29-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.50
$450.00
9-29-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.60
$354.00
9-29-10
Richards, Erica J.
$490
3.50
$1,715.00
9-29-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.25
$156.25
9-29-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.60
$375.00
9-30-10
Engelhardt, Stefan W.
$745
5.00
$3,725.00
9-30-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
4.00
$3,000.00
Total
$63,420.00
F-287459
Page 22 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-1-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.70
$301.00
9-1-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.50
$325.00
9-1-10
Quarry, Diana L.
$430
0.70
$301.00
9-1-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.50
$295.00
9-2-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.60
$390.00
9-2-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.50
$375.00
F-287459
Page 23 of 36
Date
9-2-10 9-2-10
Timekeeper
Nashelsky, Larren M. Wishnew, Jordan A.
Rate
$900 $625
Hours
0.50 0.30
Fee
$450.00 $187.50
9-3-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.20
$86.00
9-3-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.40
$300.00
9-3-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.40
$360.00
9-8-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.50
$325.00
9-8-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.30
$225.00
9-8-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.40
$360.00
F-287459
Page 24 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-8-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.50
$295.00
9-8-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.40
$250.00
9-9-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.10
$43.00
9-9-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.50
$325.00
9-9-10
Guido, Laura
$230
0.20
$46.00
9-9-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
1.00
$900.00
F-287459
Page 25 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-9-10
Quarry, Diana L.
$430
0.10
$43.00
9-9-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.50
$295.00
9-10-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.30
$195.00
9-10-10
Guido, Laura
$230
0.20
$46.00
9-10-10
Koshgerian, Stephen P.
$370
0.20
$74.00
9-10-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
1.50
$1,125.00
9-10-10
Nashelsky, Larren M
$900
1.50
$1,350.00
9-13-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.30
$129.00
9-13-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
1.30
$845.00
9-13-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.50
$325.00
F-287459
Page 26 of 36
Date
9-13-10 9-13-10 9-13-10
Timekeeper
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo McGovern, Thomas P. Nashelsky, Larren M.
Rate
$750 $610 $900
Hours
0.50 0.30 0.50
Fee
$375.00 $183.00 $450.00
9-13-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.50
$295.00
9-14-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.80
$520.00
9-14-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.50
$295.00
9-15-10
Chan, David
$245
0.20
$49.00
9-15-10
Engelhardt, Stefan W.
$745
1.50
$1,117.50
F-287459
Page 27 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-15-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
1.00
$650.00
9-15-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.50
$375.00
9-15-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.30
$225.00
9-15-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.50
$450.00
9-15-10
Quarry, Diana L.
$430
0.30
$129.00
9-15-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.70
$413.00
9-15-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.60
$375.00
9-16-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.30
$129.00
9-16-10
Chan, David
$245
0.30
$73.50
F-287459
Page 28 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-16-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.60
$390.00
9-16-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.60
$354.00
9-17-10 9-17-10
$245 $745
0.20 0.40
$49.00 $298.00
9-17-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.40
$260.00
9-17-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.40
$260.00
9-17-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.60
$450.00
9-17-10
McGovern, Thomas P.
$610
0.20
$122.00
9-17-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.60
$540.00
F-287459
Page 29 of 36
Date
9-17-10 9-20-10 9-20-10
Timekeeper
Wishnew, Jordan A. Nashelsky, Larren M. Richards, Erica J.
Rate
$625 $900 $490
Hours
0.20 0.50 0.30
Fee
$125.00 $450.00 $147.00
9-21-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
1.00
$750.00
9-21-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.20
$150.00
9-21-10
McGovern, Thomas P.
$610
0.30
$183.00
9-21-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
1.00
$900.00
9-21-10
Temple, Jeffrey J.
$795
0.20
$159.00
9-21-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.30
$187.50
9-21-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
1.90
$1,187.50
9-22-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.40
$260.00
F-287459
Page 30 of 36
Date
9-22-10
Timekeeper
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
Rate
$750
Hours
0.40
Fee
$300.00
9-22-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.40
$300.00
9-22-10
McGovern, Thomas P.
$610
0.40
$244.00
9-22-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430
1.50
$645.00
9-22-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.40
$360.00
9-22-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.40
$360.00
9-22-10 9-22-10
$590 $625
0.20 0.20
$118.00 $125.00
9-22-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.40
$250.00
9-23-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.20
$130.00
F-287459
Page 31 of 36
Date
9-23-10
Timekeeper
Guido, Laura
Rate
$230
Hours
0.30
Fee
$69.00
9-23-10
Koshgerian, Stephen P.
$370
0.30
$111.00
9-23-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.50
$375.00
9-23-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.50
$375.00
9-23-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.20
$125.00
9-24-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
1.00
$430.00
9-24-10
Engelhardt, Stefan W.
$745
1.20
$894.00
F-287459
Page 32 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-24-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
1.20
$780.00
9-24-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.40
$300.00
9-24-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.90
$675.00
9-24-10
McGovern, Thomas P.
$610
0.80
$488.00
9-24-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.50
$450.00
9-24-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.50
$295.00
9-24-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.30
$187.50
9-25-10
Richards, Erica J.
$490
0.30
$147.00
9-27-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.10
$43.00
F-287459
Page 33 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-27-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.80
$520.00
9-27-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.50
$375.00
9-27-10
McGovern, Thomas P.
$610
0.10
$61.00
9-27-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.50
$450.00
9-27-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.80
$472.00
9-27-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.30
$187.50
9-28-10
Engelhardt, Stefan W.
$745
0.60
$447.00
F-287459
Page 34 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-28-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.40
$260.00
9-28-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.20
$130.00
9-28-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
750
0.80
$600.00
9-28-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.30
$225.00
9-28-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.30
$270.00
9-28-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.20
$118.00
9-29-10 9-29-10
$650 $750
0.40 0.30
$260.00 $225.00
9-29-10
Nashelsky, Larren M.
$900
0.30
$270.00
9-29-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.40
$236.00
F-287459
Page 35 of 36
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
9-30-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.50
$375.00
9-30-10 9-30-10
$750 $900
0.30 0.50
$225.00 $450.00
9-30-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.30
$187.50
Total
$43,625.00
F-287459
Page 36 of 36
EXHIBIT 3
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 26th Floor New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 659-7300 Facsimile: (212) 918-8989 Lenard M. Parkins (NY Bar #4579124) John D. Penn (NY Bar # 4847208) Mark Elmore (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Midland Loan Services, Inc. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: INNKEEPERS USA TRUST, et al., Debtors. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 11 Case No. 10-13800 (SCC) Jointly Administered
MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, INC.S LIMITED OBJECTION TO THE MONTHLY APPLICATION OF MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP FOR COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AS ATTORNEYS FOR THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR THE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 1, 2010 THROUGH OCTOBER 31, 2010 Midland Loan Services, Inc. (Midland),1 hereby files its Limited Objection (the Objection) to the Monthly Application of Morrison & Foerster LLP for Compensation for Services and Reimbursement of Expenses as Attorneys for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors for the Period from October 1, 2010 through October 30, 2010 (the Committee Fee Request) and respectfully represents: BACKGROUND
Midland is the special servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 13, 2007 (the Special Servicing Agreement) for that certain secured loan in the amount of not less than $825,402,542 plus interest, costs and fees (the Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan) owed by certain of the above captioned Debtors.
F-288092
Page 1 of 20
1.
On August 31, 2010, the Court entered its Order Authorizing the Establishment of
Procedures for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses for Professionals and Official Committee Members (the Fee Procedures Order). Pursuant to the Fee Procedures Order, Notice Parties must file objections to the Committee Fee Request or before October 20, 2010, which is at least twenty (20) days after service of the monthly fee request.2 2. On November 29, 2010, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the
Committee) filed the Committee Fee Request seeking approval of $189,604.32 in fees and $7,336.82 in expenses, and corresponding payment of 80% of the fees and 100% of the expenses. 3. Based on the information provided by the Debtors in the Schedules of Assets and
Liabilities filed in these cases as well as supplemental information provided to financial advisors, the current estimate of the amount of allowable general unsecured trade debt owed by the Debtors appears to be relatively insignificant. The amount will likely to be further reduced as a result of allowed claims for reclamation or administrative expense claims under 11 U.S.C. 503(b)(9), which will reduce the amount even further. This estimate also does not include potential deficiency claims from secured creditor Representatives (as described in the Final Cash Collateral Order entered in these cases) that are represented by their own counsel. OBJECTIONS 4. The fees and expenses being incurred by the Committee should be carefully
reviewed since they continue to mount into the range where they could culminate in an amount equal to a substantial portion of the trade claims that might be allowed in these cases. The trade claims is the appropriate metric for the Committee since the interest of any unsecured deficiency
F-288092
Page 2 of 20
claimholders are already represented by counsel and there have been no material rejection damage claims in these cases. Even if rejection damage claims emerged, each of the franchisors of the Debtors hotel properties is represented by counsel as well. 5. It appears that the Debtors were operating their businesses and managing their
payables in the ordinary course of their businesses before these cases were filed. At any given time, approximately one month of payables would have been in the Debtors system awaiting processing and payment. This limited number of claims embodies the Committees actual constituents. Notwithstanding a fairly limited mandate, the Committee has incurred and
continues to incur substantial obligations for professional fees. 6. The fees and expensed charged by the Committees professionals indicate the
following through October 2010: Fees & Expenses Morrison & Foerster Jefferies & Co. TOTAL Through Sept. 2010 $1,019,394.75 $260,373.51 $1,279,768.26 Oct. 20103 $196,941.14 $125,000 $321,941.14 TOTAL $1,216,335.89 $385,373.51 $1,601,709.40
If the fees and expenses continued at $400,000 per month through November and December (which reflects the historical burn rate to date), by December 31, the Committees professionals would have charged over $2.4 million before a plan of reorganization had been filed, negotiated or litigated. Undeniably, the first forty-five days of these cases were very active. However, it is very likely that the Committees professionals will have charged fees and expenses equal to almost five times the amount set aside for all unsecured claims in the Plan Support Agreement that the Committee elected not to oppose. Once the amount of the trade claims is established, it might reveal the anomaly that the Committees professional fees and
3
The amount reflected for Jefferies represents the monthly fee to Jefferies for October 2010 and is subject to change when its actual fee request is filed.
F-288092
Page 3 of 20
expenses equaled or exceeded the amount of the claims of the constituents it represents as well as a multiple of the distributions to its constituents. 7. The Application reflects significant charges for matters related to billing and
compensation. The attached table identifies $19,139.50 in charges related to compensation issues, including activities that may generally be described as billing for billing. Payment beyond the initial 80% payment (20% holdback) for these charges should be denied. 8. In addition to the other items discussed herein, the Application includes a
substantial amount of interoffice discussions and conversations. (Specifically, the other items include a substantial amount of discussions and conversations they are not identified as such in the amount noted below.) The total of such is reflected on the attached table listing each such entry indicates a total of $21,375.00. Payment beyond the initial 80% payment (20% holdback) for these charges should be denied. 9. Significantly, the Application shows that as of October 31, the Committee was
well above the maximum amount of the Lenders Cash Collateral that could be charged in relation to a Challenge. Over $271,384.25 had been charged well in excess of the the $150,000 limit. Undoubtedly, charges for these items continued in November and will continue in December 2010. 10. Specifically, a Challenge under the Cash Collateral Order would include both
the review of the perfection of the Lenders liens as well as the Committees review of the 2007 Transaction. a. 12 of the Cash Collateral Order states, in pertinent part,
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Cash Collateral and the Carve Out may be used by the Committee to investigate the Loan Obligations and the Prepetition Collateral and/or a
F-288092
Page 4 of 20
potential Challenge (as defined below); provided that no more than $150,000 in the aggregate may be spent from Cash Collateral on such investigations. b. 13 includes the following, is without prejudice to the rights of the
Committee to investigate and challenge any such liens or security interests of the Adequate Protection Parties, or to assert any other claims or causes of action, at law or in equity against any of the Adequate Protection Parties (a Challenge) . . . . 11. The Application (along with the resolution regarding the invoices for August
2010) with the similar application for October reflects the following charges against the $150,000 limit for such reviews: Fees Lease/ RE Analysis 2007 Transx. Invest. Prepetition Loan Review TOTAL August 2010* 16,581.25 $2,216.50 $437.50 $19,235.25 September 2010** 33,762.00 47,977.50 35,632.00 $117,371.50 October 2010** $13,689.00 $74,484.50 $46,604.00 $134,777.50 TOTAL $64,032.25 $124,678.50 $82,673.50 $271,384.25
*The August amounts reflect the interim resolution as noted in the Notice of Resolution, Docket No. 631. **The September and October invoices includes Client Accommodation deduction that is not identified with any specific entry, task or matter. 12. It is clear that the Committee has now exceeded the amount of Cash Collateral
that may be used for this purpose and payments beyond that amount are not authorized uses of Cash Collateral regardless of whether the fees might have otherwise been allowable. Midland objects to allowance and payment of fees and expenses in excess of the limitation established and agreed upon for such Challenge. Since objections to both invoices for the September and October fees and expenses are due simultaneously, Midland objects to payments under either invoices in excess of such limitation.
F-288092
Page 5 of 20
13.
Finally, as raised previously in this case, Midland objects to the use of its cash
collateral for any activities that are contrary to Midlands interests. In a typical carve-out situation, a debtor (or other estate professional) is not entitled to use a secured creditors cash collateral to finance efforts to challenge a secured lenders claims or interests in its collateral or to support actions taken against the secured lender. Accordingly, the Committee and any professionals it employs, as estate professionals, cannot use Midlands collateral to advocate a challenge to Midlands position. Local Rule 9013-1(a) 14. This pleading includes citations to the applicable rules and statutory authorities
upon which the relief requested herein is predicated and a discussion of their application to this pleading. Accordingly, Midland submits that this pleading satisfies Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1(a).
F-288092
Page 6 of 20
CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, premises considered, Midland respectfully requests that this Court enter an order i) sustaining the Objection; ii) providing that any fees incurred in connection with the Marriott Dispute not be allocated to the Midland Debtors; iii) requiring the Committee to properly categorize its fee requests; and iv) granting such other relief as is necessary or appropriate.
Dated:
/s/ John D. Penn Lenard M. Parkins (NY Bar #4579124) Mark Elmore (admitted pro hac vice) 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 26th Floor New York, NY 10020-1007 Telephone No.: (212) 659-7300 Facsimile No.: (212) 884-8211 - and John D. Penn, Esq. (NY Bar # 4847208) Haynes and Boone, LLP 201 Main Street, Suite 2200 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Telephone No.: (817) 347-6610 Facsimile No.: (817) 348-2300 ATTORNEYS FOR MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, INC.
F-288092
Page 7 of 20
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
10-6-10 10-6-10
$230.00 $625.00
1.40 0.20
$322.00 $125.00
10-7-10
Guido, Laura
$230.00
3.30
$759.00
10-7-10
Koshgerian, Stephen P.
$370.00
0.20
$74.00
10-7-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750.00
1.00
$750.00
10-12-10
Guido, Laura
$230.00
2.80
$644.00
F-288092
Page 8 of 20
Date
10-15-10 10-15-10
Timekeeper
Koshgerian, Stephen P. Molison, Stacy L.
Rate
$370.00 $430.00
Hours
0.20 3.40
Fee
$74.00 $1,462.00
10-18-10
Koshgerian, Stephen P.
$370.00
1.60
$592.00
10-18-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430.00
0.90
$387.00
10-19-10
Koshgerian, Stephen P.
$370.00
3.30
$1,221.00
10-20-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750.00
0.80
$600.00
F-288092
Page 9 of 20
Date
10-21-10 10-21-10 10-21-10 10-21-10 10-21-10 10-22-10 10-25-10
Timekeeper
Koshgerian, Stephen P. Marinuzzi, Lorenzo Molison, Stacy L. Molison, Stacy L. Nashelsky, Larren M. Koshgerian, Stephen P. Koshgerian, Stephen P.
Rate
$370.00 $750.00 $430.00 $430.00 $900.00 $370.00 $370.00
Hours
1.30 0.40 0.10 0.30 0.60 0.90 0.30
Fee
$481.00 $300.00 $43.00 $129.00 $540.00 $333.00 $111.00
10-25-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750.00
0.70
$525.00
10-25-10 10-25-10
$430.00 $430.00
0.10 0.40
$43.00 $172.00
10-26-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625.00
0.20
$125.00
F-288092
Page 10 of 20
Date
10-27-10
Timekeeper
Molison, Stacy L.
Rate
$430.00
Hours
0.50
Fee
$215.00
10-28-10
Guido, Laura
$230.00
0.30
$69.00
10-29-10
Keeton, Douglas
$195.00
0.50
$97.50
10-29-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750.00
0.80
$600.00
10-29-10 10-29-10
$430.00 $625.00
1.00 0.20
$430.00 $125.00
Total
48.40
$19,139.50
F-288092
Page 11 of 20
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
10-1-10
Chan, David
$245
0.30
$73.50
10-1-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.50
$325.00
10-1-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.50
$295.00
10-4-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.30
$195.00
10-4-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.30
$225.00
10-4-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430
0.20
$86.00
10-4-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.30
$177.00
F-288092
Page 12 of 20
Date
10-4-10 10-5-10
Timekeeper
Wishnew, Jordan A. Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
Rate
$625 $750
Hours
0.20 0.60
Fee
$125.00 $450.00
10-5-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430
0.20
$86.00
10-6-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.40
$172.00
10-8-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.80
$472.00
F-288092
Page 13 of 20
Date
10-11-10
Timekeeper
Edelstein, Mark S.
Rate
$850
Hours
0.20
Fee
$170.00
10-11-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.50
$325.00
10-11-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430
0.70
$301.00
10-11-10 10-13-10
$590 $430
0.90 0.30
$531.00 $129.00
10-13-10
Quarry, Diana L.
$430
0.30
$129.00
Ramos, Leah A. Wishnew, Jordan A. Armstrong, Naja R. Wishnew, Jordan A. Molison, Stacy L.
10-19-10
Quarry, Diana L.
$430
0.20
$86.00
F-288092
Page 14 of 20
Date
10-19-10 10-19-10 10-19-10 10-20-10
Timekeeper
Ramos, Leah A. Wishnew, Jordan A. Wishnew, Jordan A. Galante, Paul A.
Rate
$590 $625 $625 $650
Hours
0.30 0.20 0.10 0.10
Fee
$177.00 $125.00 $62.50 $65.00
10-20-10 10-21-10
$590 $430
0.10 0.30
$59.00 $129.00
10-21-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.20
$86.00
10-21-10
Chan, David
$245
0.20
$49.00
10-21-10
Engelhardt, Stefan W.
$745
1.00
$745.00
10-21-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
1.00
$650.00
10-21-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
1.00
$750.00
10-21-10
McGovern, Thomas P.
$610
0.30
$183.00
F-288092
Page 15 of 20
Date
10-21-10
Timekeeper
Molison, Stacy L.
Rate
$430
Hours
0.20
Fee
$86.00
10-21-10
Quarry, Diana L.
$430
0.20
$86.00
10-21-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.80
$472.00
10-21-10 10-22-10
$625 $430
0.20 0.30
$125.00 $129.00
10-22-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
1.50
$975.00
10-22-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.20
$150.00
10-22-10
McGovern, Thomas P.
$610
0.30
$183.00
F-288092
Page 16 of 20
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
10-22-10
Quarry, Diana L.
$430
0.30
$129.00
10-22-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
1.50
$885.00
10-22-10 10-23-10
$625 $650
0.20 0.30
$125.00 $195.00
10-23-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.30
$177.00
10-25-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.20
$86.00
10-25-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
0.30
$195.00
10-25-10
McGovern, Thomas P.
$610
0.30
$183.00
10-25-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
0.50
$295.00
F-288092
Page 17 of 20
Date
10-25-10
Timekeeper
Riley, Robin P.
Rate
$225
Hours
0.20
Fee
$45.00
10-26-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.60
$258.00
10-26-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.20
$86.00
10-26-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
1.00
$650.00
10-26-10
Marinuzzi, Lorenzo
$750
0.60
$450.00
10-26-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430
0.40
$172.00
10-26-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430
0.40
$172.00
10-26-10
Quarry, Diana L.
$430
0.20
$86.00
10-26-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
1.00
$590.00
10-26-10 10-26-10
$625 $625
0.40 0.40
$250.00 $250.00
F-288092
Page 18 of 20
Date
10-26-10
Timekeeper
Wishnew, Jordan A.
Rate
$625
Hours
0.20
Fee
$125.00
10-27-10
Galante, Paul A.
$650
1.20
$780.00
10-27-10 10-27-10
$750 $430
0.70 0.40
$525.00 $172.00
10-27-10
Ramos, Leah A.
$590
1.20
$708.00
10-27-10
Wishnew, Jordan A.
$625
0.40
$250.00
10-28-10
Armstrong, Naja R.
$430
0.40
$172.00
10-28-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430
0.40
$172.00
F-288092
Page 19 of 20
Date
Timekeeper
Rate
Hours
Fee
10-29-10
Molison, Stacy L.
$430
1.00
$430.00
10-29-10
Riley, Robin P.
$225
0.10
$22.50
10-29-10
Temple, Jeffrey J.
$795
0.20
$159.00
Total
36.80
$21,375.00
F-288092
Page 20 of 20
EXHIBIT 4
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 26th Floor New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 659-7300 Facsimile: (212) 918-8989 Lenard M. Parkins (NY Bar #4579124) John D. Penn (NY Bar # 4847208) Mark Elmore (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, N.A. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: INNKEEPERS USA TRUST, et al., Debtors. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 11 Case No. 10-13800 (SCC) Jointly Administered
MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES OBJECTION AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO THE MONTHLY APPLICATION OF MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP FOR COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AS ATTORNEYS FOR THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 1, 2010 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2010 Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, N.A. (Midland),1 hereby files its Objection (the Objection) and Reservation of Rights With Respect to the Monthly Application of Morrison & Foerster LLP (Morrison Foerster) for Compensation for Services and Reimbursement of Expenses as Attorneys for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the Committee) for the Period from November 1, 2010 through November 30, 2010 (the Fee Request) and respectfully represents:
Midland is the special servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 13, 2007 (the Special Servicing Agreement) for that certain secured loan in the amount of not less than $825,402,542 plus interest, costs and fees (the Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan) owed by certain of the above captioned Debtors.
D-1923565
BACKGROUND 1. On August 12, 2010, the Court entered its Order Authorizing the Establishment of
Procedures for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses for Professionals and Official Committee Members (the Fee Procedures Order) [Docket No. 189]. Pursuant to the Fee Procedures Order, Notice Parties must file objections to the Fee Request or before January 20, 2010, which is at least twenty (20) days after service of the monthly fee request.2 2. On September 2, 2010, the Court entered its Final Order Authorizing the Debtors
to (i) Use the Adequate Protection Parties Cash Collateral and (ii) Provide Adequate Protection to the Adequate Protection Parties Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 361, 362, and 363 (the Cash Collateral Order) [Docket No. 402]. 3. On December 29, 2010, Morrison Foerster filed the Fee Request seeking approval
of $212,457.00 in fees and $3,349.29 in expenses, and corresponding payment of 80% of the fees and 100% of the expenses [Docket No. 781]. OBJECTION 4. Pursuant to the Cash Collateral Order, the amount of lenders cash collateral that
could be used by the Committee (and therefore the Committees professionals) in relation to a Challenge was capped at $150,000. A Challenge under the Cash Collateral Order would include both the review of the perfection of the lenders liens as well as the Committees review of the 2007 Transaction.3 As was shown in Midland Loan Services, Incs Limited Objection to
2 3
Paragraph 12 of the Cash Collateral Order states, in pertinent part, Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Cash Collateral and Carve Out may be used by the Committee to investigate the Loan Obligations and the Prepetition Collateral and/or a potential Challenge (as defined below); provided that no more than $150,000 in the aggregate may be spent from Cash Collateral on such investigations.
D-1923565
the Monthly Application of Morrison & Foerster LLP for Compensation for Services and Reimbursement of Expenses as Attorneys for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors for the Period from October 1, 2010 through October 30, 2010 [Docket No. 770], fees for Lease/RE Analysis, 2007 Transx. Invest., and Prepetition Loan Review, which are subject to the $150,000 cap, already totaled $271,384.25 through October 2010. 5. Of the fees identified in the Fee Request for November, $67,775.50 relate to
2007 Trasnx. Invest., $39,135.00 relate to Prepetition Lien Review, and $526.50 relate to Lease/Real Estate Analysis. This $107,437.00 of fees is clearly in excess of the maximum amount authorized in the Cash Collateral Order regardless of whether the fees might otherwise have been allowable. Accordingly, Midland objects to allowance and payment of fees and expenses in excess of the limitation established and agreed upon in the Cash Collateral Order. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS 6. The Fee Procedures Order included a provision for a 20% holdback of fees
charged by professionals paid from the Debtors estates. At this time, the holdback appears to be adequate to address issues that might arise in an objection to a future interim or final fee application to be submitted under 11 U.S.C. 330 or 331. 7. Midland objects to paying Morrison Foerster more than 80% of the remaining
fees described in the Fee Request before they have been reviewed and approved after notice and a hearing on such interim or final fee applications. In doing so, Midland specifically reserves its right to assert objections to fees or expenses (or both) listed on the Fee Request. Local Rule 9013-1(a) 8. This pleading includes citations to the applicable rules and statutory authorities
upon which the relief requested herein is predicated and a discussion of their application to this
D-1923565
pleading. Accordingly, Midland submits that this pleading satisfies Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1(a). CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, premises considered, Midland respectfully requests that this Court enter an order (1) sustaining the Objection; (2) providing that the $107,437.00 of fees in excess of the maximum amount authorized in the Cash Collateral Order not be allowed; (3) allowing payment of no more than 80% of the remaining allowed fees; and (4) granting such other relief as is necessary or appropriate.
Dated:
/s/ John D. Penn Lenard M. Parkins (NY Bar #4579124) Mark Elmore (admitted pro hac vice) 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 26th Floor New York, NY 10020-1007 Telephone No.: (212) 659-7300 Facsimile No.: (212) 884-8211 - and John D. Penn, Esq. (NY Bar # 4847208) Haynes and Boone, LLP 201 Main Street, Suite 2200 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Telephone No.: (817) 347-6610 Facsimile No.: (817) 348-2300 ATTORNEYS FOR MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, N.A.
D-1923565