Você está na página 1de 5

IN THE ______ COURT OF LD.METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATES AT MUMBAI C. C. NO.

____________/ SS /2009 In the matter of section 138 r/w Section 142 of the negotiable Instrument Act, as amended.

Mrs. Shikha N. More,

] ] ] ] ] ] ] COMPLAINANT

Age: 30 years, Occupation: Investor,


An Adult, Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai, Residing at Terrace Flat No.13, Third Floor, Uravashi Building, Plot No.94, Abhinandan Swami Jain Mandir Marg, Sion [west], Mumbai 400022

VERSUS Mr. Arjun Datta, Age: 45 years, Occupation: Lawyer, An adult, Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai Chief Promoter of Monsoon Melodies CHS [Proposed] having office at vinayak siddhi, 4th Floor, D.K.Marg, Chembur, Mumbai-400 071

] ] ] ] ]..ACCUSED

SUB: COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 138 READ WITH SECTION 142 OF THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT, 1881, AMENDED BY THE BANKING PUBLICINSTITUTIONS AND NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT LAW (AMENDEMENT) OF 1988 (66 OF 1988): =

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR WORSHIP: =

VERIFICATION: = I, Mrs. Shikha N. More, age: 30 years, an Adult, Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai,
residing at Terrace Flat No.13, Third Floor, Uravashi Building, Plot No.94, Abhinandan Swami Jain Mandir Marg, Sion [west], Mumbai 400022, do hereby Solemnly declare that what is stated in the foregoing paragraph of the complaint is true to my own knowledge and what is stated as legal submission are based on the information belief and legal advice and I believe the same to be true. Solemnly declared at Mumbai Identified by me:[Complainant] Before Me Advocate for the Complainant. ]

Dated this ____ day of April, 2009]

IN THE ______ COURT OF LD.METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATES AT KURLA, MUMABI C. C. NO. ____________/ SS /2009

Mrs. Shikha N. More COMPLAINANT.


VERSUS Mr. KAUSTUBH PATIL ..ACCUSED.

-: LIST OF DOCUMENT RELIED UPON BY THE COMPLAINANT:-

1.

Original Return of Cheque, bearing Cheque No. 213745, drawn on THE DHANLAXMI BANK LIMITED. Chembur Branch, Mumbai 400 071 dated 06/09/2008, Cheque is for Rs.2,50,000/(Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) in favour of the Complainant with memo of advice dated 27/02/2009. Copy of the Legal Demand Notice dated 12/03/2009 addressed to the Accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act with the Postal Slip and acknowledgement bearing thereon the signature of the Accused/ his Office staff sent to him by Post and Courier Service. Any other documents to be produced as and when required with leave of this Honble Court.

2.

3.

Dated this

day of April, 2009.

Advocate for the Complainant

IN THE ______ COURT OF LD.METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATES AT KURLA, MUMABI C. C. NO. ____________/ SS /2009

Mrs. Shikha N. More COMPLAINANT.


VERSUS Mr. Arjun Datta ..ACCUSED.

-: LIST OF WITNESSES:1. Persons/Clerk/Officer from Dhanlaxmi Bank Limited, Chembur-Branch, Mumbai 400 071 Persons/Clerk/Officer from State Bank of India, Sion -Branch, Mumbai 400 022 Clerk/Postman/Postal Authorities of the concerned Post-Office. Clerk/Officer/other Authorities of the concerned Courier Service. Complainant herself Others if any.

2.

3. 4. 5. 6.

Dated this

day of April, 2009.

Advocate for the Complainant.

Name Ekta J. Tiwari Std. S.Y.B.Com. (B. & I.) Sub. Corporate Law & Laws Governing Capital Markets Roll No. 14 Exam No. - 2324

Você também pode gostar