Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Executive summary Global economic picture CRANE MANUFACTURERS ICm20 Ranking Crane manufacturers in the Yellow Table Crane manufacturers share price performance CRANE OWNERS:
6 8 10 12 16 18
34 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
GLOBAL TRENDS
Fleet size Fleet changes Fleet composition
IC50 numbers
Cranes sizes Employment Depots Staff and depots ratio
20 22
WORLDWIDE
2012 IC50
Contents
CRANE OWNERS: TEN-YEAR
46 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70
EUROPEAN TRENDS
Europeans in the IC50 Fleet size Fleet changes Fleet composition
IC50 numbers
Cranes sizes Employment Depots Staff and depots ratio Europe analysis Economic fundamentals
IC50 numbers
Cranes sizes Employment Depots Staff and depots ratio North America analysis Economic fundamentals
fleets in the rest of the world were up 43%. The intervening years of relative stability have seen regional crane numbers ebb and flow. For the most part, Europeans have continued to grow, with a 22% increase in machine numbers between 2008 and 2012, taking the total to 8,746 machines. Owners in the rest of the world have added 9% over the same period. In contrast, North American crane owners have reduced their fleet over the last five years, with crane numbers falling 14% to 9,118 machines. This is similar to the number owned in 2005 and 2006. As a result, only about 42% of the IC50s cranes are now owned by North American companies, compared to some 59% in 2002. This period has seen a swing towards European owners, which now account for 40% of crane numbers, compared to 26% in 2002. The proportion of the fleet in the rest of the world has changed little 18% now, 15% in 2002.
20,000 5,713 5,293 NUMBER OF UNITS 15,000 4,559 4,440 5,210 10,156 9,347 10,000 9,387 8,522 8,706
7,188
7,601
8,170
7,717
8,746
10,592
10,688
9,029
8,873
9,118
5,000 4,803 2,564 0 2003 2004 Rest of the World 2005 2006 Europe 2007 2008 2009 2010 2,578 2,235 3,016 3,257 3,687 3,400
4,937 4,032
2011
2012
North America
36
Growth patterns
Overall the changes in numbers of cranes owned by the IC50 has been the subject of relatively small changes but there has been significant regional volatility
ear-on-year changes in the global fleet of cranes owned by the 50 largest IC 50 companies have been subject to relatively small changes over the last ten years. The biggest annual growth was seen in 2006, with a 9.6% increase, while the biggest fall of the last decade was 2004s 5.7% decline. The smooth cycle described by the total number of cranes worldwide, however, masks regional volatility which, in some cases, has been quite striking. Starting with the least volatile, the North American fleet has broadly followed the trend set worldwide. In some senses this is to be expected, as North American crane owners are the largest group in the IC50. The crisis years, however, have seen some departures from this trend. In 2008 North American growth lagged at 4.3%, while the IC50 grew at 12.2%. More striking was the 15.5% dip seen in 2010, very much against the trend in the rest of the world, with robust growth elsewhere driving global growth of 1.4%.
The last two years have seen North American fleet totals move more in line with the global total, and 2012 saw the regions crane numbers increase for the first time since 2009. Changes in Europes crane fleet have tended to be more volatile, particularly in the boom years, with growth of 17.3% in 2005 and 25.8% in 2008. The region has also looked more resilient to recession. Despite the severity of the financial crisis over the last five years, European crane owners have not reduced their fleets. The rest of the world market, however, has seen much more violent swings, with a particularly sharp rise in 2006 and, more surprisingly, in 2010. Crane numbers have also been susceptible to some of the biggest falls, with 2005 and 2012 standing out in this respect. It is hard to draw conclusions about such a diverse region but it is notable that the sharp growth in 2010 lined up with the height of global stimulus spending, while the 2012 drop has come at a time when developing world economic growth has generally slowed.
40%
30%
20%
10%
0% 2003 -10% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
37
2012 IC50
22
INTERNATIONAL
2012 IC50
Overall increase
IC50 NOTES
Companies are ranked by their IC Index, calculated using the total maximum load moment rating, in tonne-metres, of all cranes in a company's fleet. All companies in the list, plus other prospective ones, have the opportunity to supply fleet information and other data. Where companies supply the full data the figure used is calculated by them. In some cases, where no data is submitted, or is incomplete, we have based a companys equipment fleet figure on IC estimates. In cases of insolvency, acquisition or lack of information, companies are withdrawn from the table. While we make great effort to ensure the accuracy of information provided, it cannot be guaranteed and IC accepts no liability for inaccuracies or omissions. The IC50 Index is updated in the first quarter of each year. If you think your company should be included please contact IC for an application form.
In its 17th year, the IC50 ranking of the worlds largest crane-owning companies once again has a higher total index value, achieved with fewer cranes, people and depots than the previous year. A healthy showing of 14 new entries further bolsters the index over the 200-entry mark
ince the 2011 IC50 ranking things may have changed, downwards, in several parts of the top 100 of the 2012 table but the index is still up by a healthy margin, as is the 2012 IC50 Top 10 Index. While there are only 15 fewer depots and 362 fewer crawler cranes, there are 10,000 fewer employees and nearly 3,000 fewer wheeled mobile cranes in the top 100. Notably, however, the IC Index for the same top 100 companies is up by a strong 764,364 points around 5%. It indicates that the trend towards larger cranes continues, although the flurry of new super heavy lifters had its major impact in last years table. Since then it has been made by an accumulation of larger series-produced cranes from the major manufacturers across the categories, especially in the Top 100 companies.
Continued >
23