Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Greenacres is a smallholding on the Somerset Levels managed by Andy Harrison. The aim of this design was to work with the client to find ways of manifesting Andys diverse ideas and visions for the site in a way that were achievable and appropriate. My role as a designer was to plug some of the knowledge gaps of Andys around land management in order to optimise his relationship with the site. The desired yields were increased self-reliance especially relating to food production and the creation of a space for rest and spiritual connection to the land to support his creative work as an artist.
How this design meets the Assessment Criteria: Demonstrating Design Skills Overview of Design Process
Survey Received query from Client Andy Harrison, seeking some support for ways forward for his land 5/2/12 Initial site visit & introductions 19/2/12 Design Questionnaire & site survey 11/3/12 Drew base map & researched background site information Analysis Applied permaculture analysis tools (see Design tools & techniques used). Design Prepared concept plan & met up with client to discuss Prepared final design & design report after listening to client feedback Implementation Delivered design report with appendices of useful information & resources Evaluation Checked in regarding implementation 6 months later Evaluated my own design process
Ethics
Use & value diversity diverse plant species and families, succession planting & season coverage, diverse habitats and functions for land Use edges & value the marginal optimising garden borders to create habitat, ponds with optimum edge, paths & circular beds Creatively use & respond to change implementation plan, feedback from client & reassurance that everything changes, greater resilience for climate change Earth care encouragement of organic, permaculture, no-dig gardening approaches, compost systems, increased self-reliance, increased perennial plantings, welfare of companion animal, optimising recycled materials, soil building & habitat creation People care designing to meet client needs, spiritual & therapeutic yields, optimum nutrition, designing for low maintenance & safe space Fair shares optimising land use/small scale intensive systems, creating community connections Sector analysis Zone analysis David Holmgrens Principles Functional analysis Spirals of erosion Inputs/outputs analysis
How this design meets the Assessment Criteria: Learning from, and developing your permaculture practice Effectiveness of Design & Design Outcomes
Outcomes for client: Achievable vision and implementation plan Increased awareness & understanding of permaculture design process Energy savings by plugging spirals of erosion e.g. unnecessary weeding Effects on land management: Living willow windbreak fences planted thrived Sheet mulched vesica pisces potager garden area Restricted size of vegetable area to make more manageable Planted apple trees Have increased weed management via orchard groundcover & mowing Implemented wild/set-aside areas of habitat Cottage garden flower areas thriving (mixture of perennials and wildflowers) More wetland and native plants planted in wetland areas Personal & professional outcomes for myself: Increased confidence in consultancy process Financial reward New relationship/increased local connections Design addition to portfolio Increased awareness of time investment in consultancy work Greater understanding of peat extraction and wetland management
Evaluation Summary
What went well: Site survey: good chance to use triangulation to measure fruit trees already planted. More systematic approach to site survey allowed me to process information faster & more effectively. Client relationship: Andy was extremely kind, creative, open to ideas and drew
fantastic illustrations of his vision, which meant he was a pleasure to work with. Timescales: I decided from the start to work for a fast turnaround in terms of surveying and preparing the design, this worked well in my timetable and meant nothing dragged on for the client or myself. What I would have done differently: In hindsight I costed my time ineffectively, meaning that I did a significant amount of unpaid work (true action learning). For example the time taken to type notes from a design questionnaire interview or the time needed to research gaps in my knowledge e.g. growing on peat. Annotated my design work for the client better, as all though there was thorough information in the report, may have been easier if on the design itself. Had an evaluation of the design implementation sooner for example 3 months after the design work was completed.
Costings Summary
Quoted work: Site survey & questionnaire, 4 hours Design work, 10-15 hours Presenting concept plans 1-2 hours Drawing up final design & preparing final design report 3-5 hours 12 hourly rate. Design package 230. A costings spreadsheet was not prepared for the client as this would have incurred an extra cost for him and a more detailed design, whereas a broad vision design was the need of the client.
How this design meets the Assessment Criteria: Applying permaculture in your own life
Increased confidence in developing consultancy practice as right livelihood Time & energy saved from working with local client is more low impact Opportunity to build local relationships, thus optimising my impact on local ecosystems e.g. building long-term local resilience Opportunity to design my own self-employment systems e.g. record keeping
How this design meets the Assessment Criteria: Applying permaculture to your work and projects
Assessment categories engaged with through this design: Design Consultancy as evidenced by design documentation, this design was for paying client, Andy Harrison. Art, Media, Culture and Communications this design has been disseminated via my website, uploaded to the Permaculture Association website and shared with apprentice-peers at events.