For centuries, marriage has been defined as a union between one man and one woman.

Efforts are underway across America to redefine marriage to include same-sex couples. It is clear that activist courts and zealous political leaders are engaging in an aggressive campaign to alter the landscape of marriage. It is also clear that most Americans do not favor redefining marriage to include same-sex couples. The American Center for Law and Justice is working aggressively to ensure that marriage remains a core, societal institution that is not redefined to include anything other than a union between one man and one woman. How does Marriage Law Work? Although for many, marriage is a religious ceremony in which a man and a woman make a covenant of marriage before God, marriage is also recognized and regulated by society as an institution that benefits society through procreation and familial stability. Most law relating to marriage is made at the state and local level. States normally regulate who may get married to whom, whether mandatory medical tests are required, and whether a waiting period is required. A county or city clerk generally issues licenses to marry on the application of a qualifying couple. There are many social and economic privileges that are typically associated with marriage. For example, among other things, a spouse may inherit automatically in the absence of a will, or receive benefits such as annuities or pension plans. In addition to seeking societys endorsement of their behavior, proponents of redefining marriage have the incentive of obtaining these economic benefits as well. Are there any federal laws relating to marriage? In 1996, then-President Clinton signed into law the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). DOMA is significant for two reasons: first, for the federal government, it defines marriage as being between one man and one woman; second, on the state level, the Act allows states, if they so wish, to refuse to recognize a purported marriage that occurred in another state between someone other than one man and one woman. Multiple lawsuits have been filed against the Federal government claiming that DOMA is unconstitutional. While many of these suits were being defended successfully, in 2011, President Obama and Attorney General Holder announced that they would refuse to defend DOMA. In many of the suits that are still in progress, Congress has intervened, hiring former solicitor general Paul Clement to defend DOMA in the federal courts. What can be done on the state level? Since civil marriage is regulated on the state level, the states have been the primary fronts for the defense of traditional marriage. As of 2011, twenty-nine states have passed amendments to their state constitutions that affirm marriage for state law purposes as being between one man and one woman. One state, Hawaii has passed a constitutional amendment that does not itself affirm traditional marriage, but it makes it clear that the state legislature may define marriage as only between one man and one woman. Eleven other states define marriage as between one man and one woman by law, but not through their constitution. The District of Columbia and five other states have redefined marriage in their jurisdictions to include unions between persons of the same sex. A few of the state constitutional amendments defending traditional marriage have been challenged in federal court by claims that they violate the U.S. Constitution. The ACLJ is dedicated to defeating these unfounded claims in the Courts, and preserving the societal stability supported by strong traditional marriage.

What about a Federal Marriage Amendment? A Federal Constitutional marriage amendment has been introduced in every session of congress since 2002, but so far has failed to garner the two thirds support of each house of congress that is required by the Constitution. Such an amendment would affirm for the entire nation that marriage is between one man and one woman. The ACLJ supports principles of federalism and the rights of states to be selfgoverning in most situations. A Constitutional amendment affirmed by two thirds of congress and three fourths of all of the states best preserves both the value of federalism (by giving the states a voice in the matter) and the value of marriage and the family as a fundamental building block of a stable society. Therefore, the ACLJ supports the passage of a federal marriage amendment. What Can I do to Help? First, you can pray. Pray for our nation, pray for our leaders, pray for those who wish to undermine marriage in our culture, and pray for the Church that it would be able set an example of what marriage should be. 2 Chronicles 7:14 outlines what God asks of His people: if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land. Second, on the state level, if your state has not yet passed a constitutional amendment to protect marriage, get involved in supporting such an amendment. Talk with your friends and neighbors, call your state representatives and ask them to consider sponsoring or supporting such an amendment. Finally, on the federal level, call and write to your senators and your congressional representative and urge them to support a federal marriage amendment. And again, talk with your friends at church and in your community and ask them to support the amendment. If you have financial resources, consider donating to an organization like the ACLJ or a local organization dedicated to defending marriage from the constant attacks of those who wish to defy history and redefine the meaning of this foundational societal institution. Edmund Burk has been credited with saying that, [a]ll that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. But, the dedication of a determined few can change the world. Be one of the determined few, dedicated to preserving the societal bedrock of the strong traditional family.

What God Hath Not Joined

Why marriage was designed for male and female. Edith M. Humphrey
[ posted 9/1/2004 12:00AM ]

SHARE PRINT EMAIL SINGLE PAGE COMMENTS (0) RELATED TOPICS

Our radically confused society is debating the meaning of marriage with increasing intensity. That question leads to a host of other issuesespecially the boundaries of sexual behavior and the nature of procreation. No one is untouched by this debate.

Confusion in society spreads easily to the church. To help bring a biblical perspective to these discussions, Christianity Today offers this special section, the first of a series. Here we focus on the meaning of marriage in light of the national debate about gay marriage. In future issues, we'll go down other paths. As we address these issues over the long term, we hope to communicate two things: First, a definite "no" to calls to lower the moral bar (whether they come from within the church or from secular critics). And second, a decided "yes" to respect and extend compassion to the people who advocate views and practices we oppose. The issues are too important to fall short in either direction. Editors
"Have you not read that the one who made them at the beginning 'made them male and female,' and said, 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother, be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh'?" So Jesus declares that in the first marriage and in every marriage since, it is God himself who joins particular members of the opposite sex together in a natural relation unlike any other. All societies have honored this special union that Christians, Jews, and Muslims rightly recognize to be a gift of the Creator. Even in an atheistic context like Russia during the Communist period, Muscovite couples were married with festal trappings at what passed for a sacred site, Lenin's tomb. Our generation has introduced a tear in this universal fabric. Same-sex activists are clamoring for the state to grant homosexual couples marital status. These blows to the definition of marriage are landing not only in the North American civil sphere, but within churches. Theological arguments may not hold much sway in public debate, and there are certainly good social reasons for preserving the definition of marriage. But for the defense of marriage in both civil society and church, Christians must look toand guardthe deep theological foundations of marriage. Theological foundations are indeed under attack. On June 3, the General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada, while deferring the decision to bless same-sex unions in formal ceremonies, declared that longstanding homoerotic relationships were already sanctified. Even while questioning whether this issue touches on core doctrine, the Synod employed a theological term (sanctity) to "support" its gay and lesbian members. Such confusing events lead the faithful to ask: What is the connection between the same-sex debate and doctrine? Can those who desire the "sanctity of marriage" rightly find it for same-sex relationships? Can same-sex unions truly be blessed in the churches? The cry goes up that the biblical teaching must be surpassed, since "God is doing a new thing." What is the style of God's action in the world? How does the Bible describe God's activity and homoeroticism itself? In Romans 1:18-32, Paul traces the drama of creation, sin, idolatry, and rebellion. Wonderfully, the created order provided a window through which God's glory can be seen (20). Humanity drew the blinds over this window, however, when it acted willfully, giving neither honor nor thanks to the Creator. But true atheism is not possible for those made to worship. Human beings simply exchanged loyalties, worshiping creatures rather than God (23). God's response to this senseless idolatry was to permit the natural consequences (24, 26). Paul gives a vivid example of this fallout: Human passions are disturbed and the primary created relationship (male and female) is distorted into homoerotic behavior (24, 26-27).