Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Submitted by :
Zunaira Tarif
2013
Page 1
Youth Crimes
Acknowledgements
I am heartily thankful to Allah Almighty and my supervisor, whose encouragement, supervision and support from the preliminary to the concluding level enabled me to develop an understanding of the subject. Lastly, I offer my regards and blessings to all of those who supported me in any respect during the completion of this research report.
Page 2
Youth Crimes
Abstract
There are a number of concerns about young people and crime as it seems to be at the top of media reporting and also political agendas. This research analyzes the social factors, economic environment and family structure which influence youth crime. It will look at key perspectives such as the sociological, economical views towards youth crime also it will review the evidence to why they get involved in varies of crimes. This will be done by looking at my primary research. Results show that all of these factors influence the youth crimes but economic factor highly affect it.
Page 3
Youth Crimes
Page 4
Youth Crimes
crime as that committed by those under the age of 18, but the purpose of our research is to take from 17 t0 27 ages as youth. Youth crime and a history of young people There have been complaints and issues made regarding the behavior of young people. There is a widespread belief that antisocial behavior among children and young people has reached a historically unprecedented high. According to conations north London, it states that young people are responsible of 40% of crimes such as theft, burglary, robbery and violence and youth crime and also fear to youth crime is causing frustration to many of the communities. Youth crime basically harms communities, creates a culture of fear and also damages the lives of some of our most vulnerable young people. There are many factors that cause youth crime today as it changes an individual's life. This can be for example troubled home life, poor attainment at school, truancy and school exclusion etc. Most of the young people think getting into trouble is part of maturing/growing up, as they want to test the limits, however, this process often has many questions raised against it and it is seen as a major problem. Youth crime is a major issue, today as the public seem to have a fear against it as it is rising. The public has negative opinions towards it as this means the government will have a huge input within this matter. This has however set the circumstance for an ever increasing volume of legislation seeking to adjust and improve society's official response. One of the youth crimes that has increased today and which is a major issue is violence, according to telegraph newspaper violent youth crime is up a third. Leapman (2008) suggests that The number of under-18s convicted or cautioned over violent offences rose from 17,590 to 24,102 - an increase of 37 per cent. This shows this is one of the main crimes in which the youths commit the most and has a huge increase towards it. The public was very concerned about this as it is a major youth crime within their communities, Leapman (2008) went on and stated that The evidence of rising youth offending comes amid public concern over youth crime following the murder of Garry Newlove, a father of three who was beaten to death as he stood up to a street gang
Page 5
Youth Crimes
Criminal behavior of young people is an important political issue in the UK over recent years. This concept follows basically goes on to say that if a young person is prepared to break the law or involved, then they should be held responsible for their actions and therefore face punishment. According to the home office research study which was on youth crime: findings from the 1998/99 youth lifestyle survey, states that the most common offences committed by girls under the age of 17 were criminal damage, shoplifting, buying stolen goods and fighting. There is a comparatively high rate of offending by 14- to 15-year-old boys reflects their involvement in fights, in buying stolen goods, other theft' and in criminal damage. Roughly one in eight boys of this age admitted to each. However 16- to 17-year-old boys showed a similar pattern of offending but were less involved in buying and selling stolen goods, other theft' and criminal damage. Over a third of offences committed by this age group involved fighting. There is not much of a different with gender and age groups committing crimes, this report shows youths under 17 committing common crimes. There is no single root cause of crime. Crime is primarily the outcome of multiple adverse social, economic, cultural and family conditions. To prevent crime it is important to have an understanding of its roots. Causes of crime differ from country to country because of different cultural, social and economic characteristics. Economic Situation Social Environment Family Structures Scope of study: To analyze the relationship between independent and dependent variables. To measure how much these factors effect or influence the youth crimes. To provide the applicable remedies to remove youth crimes in society.
Page 6
Youth Crimes
Page 7
Youth Crimes
they are in large gangs it normally means they take part in an anti social activity, violent behavior. According to the public, gangs is one of the main factor that influences youths crime as they are peer pressured, they may commit crime due to fear as they are in a gang. Gangs in local community have a major role play within violent activities as to why this concerns the public today. Street crimes are mainly held by teen gangs, Klein, M (1971) defines teen gangs as Any denotable group of youngsters, who are generally perceived as a distinct aggression by others in their neighborhood, or recognize themselves as a denotable group with a group name, and also the ones who have been involved in a sufficient number of delinquent incidents to call forth a consistent negative response from neighborhood residents and/or law enforcement agencies. (Malcolm Klein, street gangs and street workers 1971) The anomie and strain theory was developed by Emile Durkheim in division of labour' (1893). In this book, anomie was disregarded by American criminologists. But in the 1950's Robert K. Merton started applying this theory to sociology which he wrote about in his essay social structure and anomie' (Merton 1938). Since then this theory has been used repetitively in various arguments and studies to display the moral panic' of increased criminal behavior amongst today's youth. This has been emphasized hugely within the media; by the Home Office statistical data; as well as other professional organizations. From a functionalist perspective, Durkheim perceived that society was similar to humans in the way that in order to function satisfactorily and in perfect harmony, each aspect of society has to fit together conveniently. He resented the individual perceptions regarding psychological, classical and biological reasons for criminal behaviors. As society exists based on what the media states, it is apparent that people are easily influenced as to what they perceive to be true. More than usual, the media does not define crime in the same way that the authorities do such as muggings' which are in fact robberies. But the fact remains that people still have some kind of understanding as to what these terms mean as the media familiarizes people with their use of language knowing that the law is sometimes regarded as an unreliable source of information due to the various injustices that occur. As Hall et al (1978) recognized that the media uses certain tactics to create moral panic. It is clear that the media is
Page 8
Youth Crimes
advantageous in being able to clarify aspects of society to the public by their own means. For example elderly members of society are more careful about going out alone as they fear they are in danger from the youth. However perhaps the media influences youth crime to broaden as a label is placed on individuals whom consequently are made to act in a certain way due to them being known' in this way. Disregarding the good aspects of youth, the media paves the way of making the younger generation behave in a defiant way to meet their perceived behaviors by the media. It is realistic to state that the media focuses on the bad points about the youth rather than praising the good aspects; this is why youth within a certain community are downgraded according to their social status which is based around where they live and how they dress. Media also ignores the fact that young people are also likely to be targeted victims of crimes; predominantly with the recent advances in telecommunication technology for example mobile phoned even iPods. This is ignored just when the media targets firm social classes as being delinquent. Lack of education according to Beatrix Campbell is defiantly crucial to the reviewing of manhood and its connection to crime as unemployment consigns men to the world of women, it denies those institutions and activities and which then leads Campbell views to unemployment as being a factor of unleashing and endorsing extreme forms of masculinity. By this reference Campbell basically means that due to youths constantly having nothing to do and the pressures of no employment and no income they resort to violent solutions to the demands of life.
Page 9
Youth Crimes
Economic situation
Social environment
Family structure
Independent Variables
Dependent Variable
Methodology
This study is descriptive study. Here we check the relationship between variables. We took both primary and secondary data. We are using the primary data for questionnaires.
Page 10
Youth Crimes
Sampling: Research population is educated youth and our sampling frame is the educational institutes of our city. Sample size n=30. Our sampling is non-probability sampling. Questionnaire: Nominal scale is used in questionnaire for personal information. For research purpose the scales used are ratio scale, category scale and likert scale. The main factors used are economic situation, family structure and social environment. The sub factors we used are unemployment, inequality, poverty, poor supervision from school and parents and television. Data is measured by using frequencies and convert it into simple percentages.
Page 11
Youth Crimes
Main Factors
15 10 5 0 Social Environment Economic Situation Family Structure Main Factors All of them
Interpretation Survey results shows that 50% respondents said that all of these factors influence the youth towards crimes, 16.67% is thought that social environment, 26.67% is thought economic situation and only 6.66% is thought that the family structure is the main factor.
Page 12
Youth Crimes
Economic Situation
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 40%---50% 60%---70% 80%---90% Above 90%
Economic Situation
Interpretation: 40% respondents lies between 60%---70% that economic situation influences the youth crimes in the society. And 33.34% are thought it is 40%---50% responsible.
Page 13
Youth Crimes
Social Environment
15 10 5 0 40%---50% 60%---70% 80%---90% Above 90%
Social Environment
Interpretation: 36.67% respondents are laying between 40%---50% and 60%---70% that social environment forces the youth toward crimes.
Page 14
Youth Crimes
Table.4: Family structure has negative impact on youth to influence them into crimes
40%---50% 60%---70% 80%---90% Above 90% Frequency Percentage Graph 23 76.67% 4 13.33% 3 10% 0 0%
Interpretation: The respondents 76.67% are agreed from 40%---50% family structure have negative impact on youth to influence them into crimes.
Page 15
Youth Crimes
Interpretation: The results of this table clearly show that 60% people are agreed that youth crimes are increasing day by day in society.36.66% are strongly agreed.
Page 16
Youth Crimes
Unemployment
20 15 10 5 0 Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Unemployment
Interpretation: Results show that 60% respondents are strongly agreed that unemployment leads youth towards crimes.
Page 17
Youth Crimes
Interpretation: 43.33% respondents agree that inequality is the cause of youth crimes.
Page 18
Youth Crimes
Poverty
10 8 6 4 2 0 Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Poverty Agree Strongly agree
Interpretation: The table shows that 30% respondents are agreed, 30%s answer is neutral and 30% are strongly agreed.
Page 19
Youth Crimes
Interpretation: 20% respondents are disagreed, 20% are strongly agreed, 16.67%s answer is neutral and 43.33% respondents are agreed that bad company in the school is the base of youth crimes.
Page 20
Youth Crimes
Interpretation: 46.67% respondents are agreed that poor supervision from school may be a cause of youth crime.
Page 21
Youth Crimes
Table.11: Television also mislead the youth towards crimes as a mean of adventure
Strongly disagree 1 Frequency Percentage Graph 1 3.34% 2 5 16.67% 3 7 23.33% 4 8 26.66% Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree 5 9 30%
Interpretation: Results show that 30% respondents strongly agree that television misleads the youth. 26.67% respondents are agreed.
Page 22
Youth Crimes
Interpretation: 46.67% respondents are agreed that if parents involve in crimes then their children would be involve in crimes.
Page 23
Youth Crimes
Graph
Child abuse
15 10 5 0 Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Child abuse Agree Strongly agree
Interpretation: The last table of our research shows that 20% respondents disagree, 36.67% agree, 16.67% strongly agree and 26.67%s answer is neutral that child abuse may be a cause of youth crimes.
Page 24
Youth Crimes
Page 25
Youth Crimes
Page 26
Youth Crimes
Durkheim. E. (1893) Division of labour Hough, M. Et al (2004), Youth crime and youth justice (page 1) http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/hors209.pdf http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1576076/Violent-youth-crime-up-a-third.html http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4156/is_19991205/ai_n13944432/?tag=rbxcra.2.a.11 Klein, M. 1971, Responding to youth crime radical criminal justice partnerships Leapman, B. (2008) Violent youth crime up a third' Telegraph January, 20.p.3 online Merton. R. K (1938) social structure and anomie
Page 27