BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

June 2009

2009-0010

2100, 350 7 Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta Canada T2P 3N9 Tel (403) 267-1100 Fax (403) 261-4622

403, 235 Water Street St. Johns, Newfoundland and Labrador Canada A1C 1B6 Tel (709) 724-4200 Fax (709) 724-4225

www.capp.ca communication@capp.ca

The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) represents 130 companies that explore for, develop and produce more than 90 per cent of Canadas natural gas and crude oil. CAPP also has 150 associate member companies that provide a wide range of services that support the upstream oil and natural gas industry. Together, these members and associate members are an important part of a $120-billion-a-year national industry that affects the livelihoods of more than half a million Canadians.

Review by July 2013

Disclaimer This publication was prepared for the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP). While it is believed that the information contained herein is reliable under the conditions and subject to the limitations set out, CAPP does not guarantee its accuracy. The use of this report or any information contained will be at the users sole risk, regardless of any fault or negligence of CAPP or its co-funders.

2100, 350 7 Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta Canada T2P 3N9 Tel (403) 267-1100 Fax (403) 261-4622

403, 235 Water Street St. Johns, Newfoundland and Labrador Canada A1C 1B6 Tel (709) 724-4200 Fax (709) 724-4225

www.capp.ca communication@capp.ca

Contents
1 2 3 Overview.......................................................................................................................1 Failure Statistics ...........................................................................................................2 Corrosion Mechanisms and Mitigation.......................................................................3 3.1 3.2 4 5 6 7 8 9 Pitting Corrosion..............................................................................................3 Other Failure Mechanisms ..............................................................................3

Recommended Practices ..............................................................................................9 Corrosion Mitigation Techniques..............................................................................16 Corrosion Monitoring Techniques ............................................................................18 Corrosion Inspection Techniques..............................................................................20 Leak Detection Techniques .......................................................................................22 Repair and Rehabilitation Techniques......................................................................23

Figures
Figure 2-1: Natural Gas Pipeline Operating FailuresTotal Failures and Failure Frequency by Reporting Year .................................................................................................................2 Figure 3-1: Internal Corrosion in a Water Injection Pipeline Prior to Grit Blast Cleaning .............4 Figure 3-2: Internal Corrosion in a Water Injection Pipeline After Grit Blast Cleaning.5

Tables
Table 3.1: Contributing Factors and Prevention of Internal Water injection Corrosion...............7-8 Table 3.2: Contributing Factors and Prevention of Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipelines.............9 Table 4.1: Recommended Practices - Design and Construction................................................ 10-11 Table 4.2: Recommended Practices - Operating Practices ........................................................ 12-15 Table 5.1: Corrosion Mitigation Techniques .............................................................................. 16-17 Table 6.1: Corrosion Monitoring Techniques............................................................................. 18-19 Table 7.1: Corrosion Inspection Techniques .............................................................................. 20-21 Table 8.1: Leak Detection Techniques........................................................................................ 22-23 Table 9.1: Repair and Rehabilitation Techniques....................................................................... 24-26

Overview Corrosion is a dominant contributing factor to failures and leaks in pipelines. To deal with this issue, the CAPP Pipeline Technical Committee has developed industry recommended practices to improve and maintain the mechanical integrity of upstream pipelines. They are intended to assist upstream oil and gas producers in recognizing the conditions that contribute to pipeline corrosion incidents, and identify effective measures that can be taken to reduce the likelihood of corrosion incidents. This documents addresses design, maintenance, and operating considerations for the mitigation of internal corrosion in oilfield water handling systems. Within this document, oilfield water pipelines are defined as those constructed with carbon steel materials and transporting fresh or produced water. Typically, these would be pipelines used to convey fresh source water, produced water for water flood purposes, or water sent for disposal down disposal wells. This document does not address the deterioration of aluminum and non-metallic pipelines. This document is complementary to CSA Z662 and supports the development of corrosion control practices within Pipeline Integrity Management Programs, as required by CSA Z662 and the applicable regulatory agency. In the case of any inconsistencies between the guidance provided in this document and either Z662 or regulatory requirements, the latter should be adhered to. This document is intended for use by corrosion specialists involved with the development and execution of corrosion mitigation programs, engineering teams involved in the design of gathering systems, and operations personnel involved with the implementation of corrosion mitigation programs and operation of wells and pipelines in a safe and efficient manner. It contains a consolidation of key industry experience and knowledge used to reduce oil effluent pipeline corrosion; however it is not intended to be a comprehensive overview of all practices. Additional recommended practices developed by the CAPP Pipeline Technical Committee are: Best Management Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Sour Gas Gathering Systems Best Management Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Sweet Gas Gathering Systems Best Management Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oil Effluent Gathering Systems Best Management Practice for Mitigation of External Corrosion on Buried Pipeline Systems

These documents are available free of charge on the CAPP website at www.capp.ca.

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 1

Failure Statistics In 2008, oilfield water pipeline systems accounted for 22% of the total pipeline incidents in Alberta. In 2008, internal corrosion was the cause of approximately 35% of the 170 oilfield water pipeline incidents in Alberta. This is the largest of any individual cause for oilfield water pipeline incidents.
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 49.3 42.0 40.8 45.1 40.1 39.1 31.2 26.0 22.4 19.8 18.318.2 14.1 12.9 10.8 9.4 10.0 10.8 8.3 9.0 8.9 7.1 7.7 9.6
419 378 379 460 425 438

500 # WA Incidents / 1000km Total WA Incidents

365 315 284 259 254 264 214 205 178 180 161 159 201 212 185 185 153 170

450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0

19851986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

# WA Incidents / 1000km 49.3 42.0 40.8 45.1 40.1 39.1 31.2 26.0 22.4 19.8 18.3 18.2 14.1 12.9 10.8 9.4 10.0 10.8 8.3 9.0 8.9 7.1 7.7 9.6 Total WA Incidents WA Length (1000's km) 419 378 379 460 425 438 365 315 284 259 254 264 214 205 178 161 180 201 159 185 185 153 170 212 8.5 9.0 9.3 10.2 10.6 11.2 11.7 12.1 12.7 13.1 13.9 14.5 15.2 15.9 16.5 17.1 18 18.6 19.1 20.5 20.9 21.7 22.1 22.1

Figure 2-1 Total Oilfield Water Pipeline Incidents and Oilfield Water Pipeline Incidents/1000km by Year in Alberta (source: ERCB)
Figure 17b - Water Pipeline Incidents by Cause
Corrosion (Internal) (CI) Construction Damage (CD) Corrosion (External) (CX) Unknown (UN) All Other Causes Mechanical Joint Failure (JF)

400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Figure 2-2 Oilfield Water Pipeline Incidents by Cause in Alberta (source: ERCB) June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems Page 2

Corrosion Mechanisms and Mitigation 3.1 Pitting Corrosion Pitting corrosion along the bottom of the pipeline is the primary corrosion mechanism leading to failures in uncoated carbon steel water pipelines. The common features of this mechanism are: 3.2 the water contains any of the following; O2, CO2, H2S, bacteria, chlorides, scale, or suspended solids the presence of fluid traps where solids can accumulate

Other Failure Mechanisms There are a number of other failure causes that occur commonly with water pipelines. These include the following: improper design or construction of internally coated pipeline systems (e.g. poor coating application, uncoated risers, uncoated flange faces, use of metallic gaskets, etc.) damage resulting from improper installation of non-metallic piping systems (e.g. rough handling) the presence of deteriorated, damaged, or ineffective coatings, linings, or joining systems

Figure 3-1: Internal Corrosion in a Water Injection Pipeline Prior to Grit Blast Cleaning

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 3

Figure 3-2: Internal Corrosion in a Water Injection Pipeline After Grit Blast Cleaning (same pipeline as above)

Figure 3-3: Internal Corrosion Under a Cracked Epoxy Coatings

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 4

Figure 3-4: Internal Corrosion on Flange Face. Note Corrosion Caused by Use of Metallic Rather than Non-Metallic Gasket.

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 5

Tables 3.1 and 3.2 describe the most common contributors, causes, and effects of internal corrosion in oilfield water pipelines. The tables also contain corresponding mitigation measures commonly used to reduce oilfield water pipeline corrosion. It is applicable to both internally bare carbon steel pipeline systems and to coated or lined pipelines where deterioration or damage has allowed water contact with the steel substrate.
3.1 Contributing Factors and Prevention of Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipelines Mechanisms Contributor Oxygen Cause/Source Ingress from vented water storage tanks or ineffective gas blanketing systems Present in surface source waters Effect Oxygen can accelerate pitting corrosion at concentrations as low as 50 parts per billion Typical organic inhibitor effectiveness can be reduced by the presence of oxygen CO2 dissolves in water to form carbonic acid Corrosion rates increase with increasing levels of dissolved CO2 H2S dissolves in water to form weak acidic solution. Corrosion rates increase with increasing H2S levels Hydrogen sulphide can form protective iron sulphide (FeS) scales Localized breakdown of FeS scales results in accelerated pitting Effective pigging and inhibition programs Small amounts of H2S (less than 500 ppm) can be beneficial as a protective FeS film can be established Effective pigging and inhibition Mitigation Use gas blanketing, vacuum deaeration, and oxygen scavengers

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Often present in waters CO2 concentration can be increased through miscible floods (CO2 floods)

Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S)

Sometimes present in waters H2S concentration can be increased through formation souring Can be generated by sulfate reducing bacteria

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 6

Contributor Bacteria

Cause/Source Produced from the reservoir or present in surface source waters Contaminated production equipment Contaminated drilling and completion fluids

Effect Acid producing and sulfate reducing bacteria can lead to localized pitting attack Solid deposits provide an environment for growth of bacteria

Mitigation Effective pigging program Treat with inhibitors and biocides Eliminate the introduction of bacteria (i.e. treat the source of the problem) Install pigging facilities and maintain an effective pigging program Acid removal of scale Scale inhibitor chemical treatments Install pigging facilities and maintain an effective pigging program Control corrosion through effective inhibition

Scale Deposition

Porous nonprotective scales can adhere to pipe surface Scale can form due to pressure and/or temperature changes, or from comingling waters

The deposited scale may increase the pitting rate by creating localized corrosion beneath the deposit (i.e. under deposit corrosion)

Solid Accumulations

Mainly produced from the formation, can include sand or scale May originate from drilling fluids, workover fluids, and scaling waters May include corrosion products from upstream equipment Low fluid velocity or poor pigging practices allow solids to accumulate in the pipeline

Accumulated solids and debris may increase the pitting rate by creating localized corrosion beneath the deposit (i.e. under deposit corrosion) Solids can reduce the corrosion inhibitor concentration available to protect the pipe

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 7

3.2 Contributing Factors and Prevention of Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipelines Operating Practices Contributor Detrimental Operating Practices Cause/Source Ineffective pigging Ineffective inhibition Inadequate pipeline suspension Commingling of incompatible waters (i.e. mixing waters can create scale problems) Design pipelines to allow for effective shut-in and isolation Develop and implement proper suspension procedures, including pigging and inhibition Test for fluid compatibilities Limit operating temperature Effect Accelerated corrosion Mitigation Design pipeline to be piggable

Exceeding Maximum Operating Temperature Change in operating temperature Coating deterioration and corrosion damage High temperatures can damage both internal and external coatings Unmanaged change may result in gaps in the effectiveness of an Integrity Management Program

Management of Change (MOC)

Change in production characteristics or operating practices Well re-completions and work overs Lack of system operating history and practices Changing personnel and system ownership

Implement an effective MOC process Maintain integrity of pipeline operation and maintenance history and records Re-assess corrosivity on a periodic basis

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 8

Recommended Practices Tables 4.1 describes the recommended practices for mitigation of internal corrosion in oil field water pipelines during design and construction. Tables 4.2 describes the recommended practices for mitigation of internal corrosion in oil field water pipelines during operation. Note: The primary method for controlling corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline systems is the use of properly installed coated, lined, or non-metallic pipelines.

4.1: Recommended Practices - Design and Construction Element Materials of Construction Recommended Practice Consider use corrosion resistant materials nonmetallic materials as per CSA Z662 Clause 13 Reinforced composite, thermoplastic-lined and polyethylene pipelines Consider use of internally coated carbon steel pipeline systems (i.e. nylon or epoxy coated) with an engineered joining system Benefit Non-metallic materials are corrosion resistant Properly coated or lined steel pipelines are corrosion resistant Comments Non-metallic materials may be used as a liner or a free standing pipeline depending on the service conditions

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 9

Element Pipeline Isolation

Recommended Practice Install valves that allow for effective isolation of pipeline segments from the rest of the system Install binds for effective isolation of in-active pipeline segments

Benefit Allows the effective suspension and discontinuation of pipeline segments

Comments Removes potential deadlegs from the gathering system Be aware of creating deadlegs between isolation valve and mainline at tie-in locations (i.e. install 12 oclock tee tie-ins, or above ground riser tie-ins) Develop shut-in guidelines for the timing of required steps to isolate and lay up pipelines in each system Multi-disc/cup pigs have been found to be more effective than ball or foam type pigs Use pigs that are properly over sized, undamaged, and not excessively worn. Receivers and launchers can be permanent or mobile

Pigging Capability

Install or provide provisions for pig launching and receiving capabilities Use consistent line diameter and wall thickness Use piggable valves, flanges, and fittings

Pigging is one of the most effective methods of internal corrosion control Pigging improves the effectiveness of corrosion inhibitor treatments

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 10

Element Inspection Capability

Recommended Practice Install or provide capability for inspection tool launching and receiving Use consistent line diameter and wall thickness

Benefit Internal inspection using inline inspection (intelligent pigging) is the most effective method for confirming overall pipeline integrity Proper design allows for pipeline inspection without costly modifications or downtime

Comments Consideration should be given to the design of bends, tees, and risers to allow for navigation by the inspection devices

Use piggable valves, flanges, and fittings

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 11

Table 4.2: Recommended Practices Operating Practices Element Corrosion Assessment Recommended Practice Evaluate operating conditions (temperature, pressure, water quality) and prepare a corrosion mitigation program Communicate corrosion assessment, operating parameters, and the mitigation program to field operations and maintenance personnel Re-assess corrosivity on a periodic basis and subsequent to a line failure Benefit Effective corrosion management comes from understanding and documenting design and operating parameters Comments Refer to CSA Z662 Clause 9 Corrosion Control Define acceptable operating ranges consistent with the mitigation program Consider the effects of H2S, CO2, Oxygen, chlorides, bacteria, and solids

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 12

Element Corrosion inhibition and monitoring

Recommended Practice Develop and communicate the corrosion inhibition and monitoring program to field operations and maintenance personnel NOTE: Ensure personnel understand their responsibilities and are accountable for implementation and maintenance of corrosion management programs. Develop suspension and lay up procedures for inactive pipelines

Benefit Allows for an effective corrosion mitigation program

Comments Refer to Section 5 for Corrosion Mitigation Techniques Refer to Section 6 for Corrosion Monitoring Techniques Refer to CSA Z662 Clause 9 Corrosion Control Number and location of monitoring devices is dependent on the predicted corrosivity of the system Consider provisions for chemical injection, monitoring devices, and sampling points Refer to Section 7 for Corrosion Inspection Techniques Refer to CSA Z662, Clause 9 Corrosion Control Risk assessments should be used to prioritize inspections

Inspection Program

Develop an inspection program or strategy Communicate inspection program to field operations and maintenance personnel.

Creates greater buy in and awareness of corrosion mitigation program Provides assurance that the corrosion mitigation program is effective.

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 13

Element Failure Analysis

Recommended Practice Recovery of an undisturbed sample of the damaged pipeline Conduct thorough failure analysis Use the results of the failure analysis to reassess the corrosion mitigation program Inspect to determine extent and severity of damage prior to carrying out any repair or rehabilitation Based on inspection results, use CSA Clauses 10.9 and 10.10 to determine extent and type of repair required Implement or make modifications to corrosion control program after repairs Develop a leak detection strategy

Benefit Improved understanding of corrosion mechanisms detected during inspections or as a result of a failure Allows for corrosion mitigation program adjustments in response to inspection results Prevents multiple failures on the same pipeline Prevents reoccurrence of problem

Comments Adjust the corrosion mitigation program based on the results of the failure analysis

Repair and Rehabilitation

Refer to Section 7 for Corrosion Inspection Techniques Refer to CSA Z662 Clause 10.10 for repair requirements

Leak Detection

Permits the detection of leaks

Refer to Section 8 for Leak Detection Techniques Technique utilized depends on access and ground conditions

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 14

Element Management of Change

Recommended Practice Implement an effective MOC process Maintain integrity of pipeline operation and maintenance records

Benefit Ensures that change does not impact the integrity of the pipeline system

Comments Unmanaged change may result in accelerated corrosion, using inappropriate mitigation strategy for the conditions (outside the operating range)

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 15

Corrosion Mitigation Techniques Table 5.1 describes common techniques that should be considered for the mitigation of internal corrosion in oilfield water pipelines.

Table 5.1: Corrosion Mitigation Techniques Technique Oxygen Control Description Use gas blanketing, vacuum deaeration, and oxygen scavengers Periodic pigging of pipeline segments to remove solids and debris Comments The presence of small amounts of oxygen (parts per billion) will accelerate corrosion Pigging is one of the most effective methods of internal corrosion control Can be an effective method of cleaning pipelines and reducing potential for bacteria colonization and under-deposit corrosion Selection of pig type and sizing is important to ensure effectiveness Requires facilities for launching and receiving pigs Provides a barrier between corrosive elements and the pipe surface Application procedure is important in determining effectiveness (i.e. volume of chemical, diluent used, contact time, and application interval). Should be applied between two pigs to effectively clean and lay down inhibitor on the pipe. Should be used in conjunction with pigging to remove liquids and solids (i.e. the inhibitor must be applied to clean pipe to be the most effective)

Pigging

Batch Corrosion Inhibition Periodic application of a batch corrosion inhibitor to provide a protective barrier on the instead of the pipe.

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 16

Technique Continuous Corrosion Inhibitor Chemical Treatment

Description Continuous injection of a corrosion inhibitor to reduce the corrosivity of the transported fluids or provide a barrier film

Comments Can be costly to treat high volumes of water Continuous injection may be less effective at contacting full pipe surface, especially in a dirty system. Batch treatments may be more effective Chemical pump reliability is important in determining effectiveness Assists in controlling bacterial growth Use in conjunction with pigging (to clean the line) will enhance effectiveness Batch treatments are typically the most effective The use of improperly selected biocides can create a foam that can be a serious operational issue

Biocide Chemical Treatments

Periodic application of a biocide to kill bacteria in the pipeline system.

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 17

Corrosion Monitoring Techniques Table 6.1 describes the most common techniques for monitoring corrosion and operating conditions associated with internal corrosion in oilfield water pipelines.

Table 6.1: Corrosion Monitoring Techniques Technique Water Analysis Description Ongoing monitoring of general water chemistry, pH, chlorides, dissolved metals, bacteria, suspended solids, chlorine, oxygen, and chemical residuals Comments Changes in water chemistry will influence the corrosion potential Trends in dissolved metal concentration (i.e. Fe, Mn) can indicate changes in corrosion activity Chemical residuals can be used to confirm the level of application Sampling location and proper procedures are critical for accurate results

Production Monitoring

Ongoing monitoring of production conditions such as pressure, temperature and flow rates

Changes in operating conditions will influence the corrosion potential. Production information can be used to assess corrosion susceptibility based on fluid velocity and corrosivity Chemical pump reliability and inhibitor inventory control is critical where mitigation program includes continuous chemical injection The corrosion mitigation program must be properly implemented to be effective The impact of any noncompliance to the mitigation program must be evaluated to assess the effect on corrosion

Mitigation Program Compliance

Ongoing monitoring of mitigation program implementation and execution

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 18

Technique Corrosion Coupons

Description Used to indicate general corrosion rates, pitting susceptibility, and mitigation program effectiveness

Comments Coupon type, placement, and data interpretation are critical to successful application of this method Coupons should be used in conjunction with other monitoring and inspection techniques Bio-spool placement and data interpretation are critical to successful application of these methods Bio-spools should be used in conjunction with other monitoring and inspection techniques Solids pigged out of pipelines (pig yields) can be tested for bacteria levels Bacteria presence on surfaces is considered a better way to quantify type and numbers present in the system The device selection, placement, and data interpretation are critical to successful application of these methods Continuous or intermittent data collection methods are used Electrochemical monitoring should be used in conjunction with other monitoring and inspection techniques

Bio-spools

Used to monitor for bacteria presence and mitigation program effectiveness

Electrochemical Monitoring

There are a variety of methods available such as electrochemical noise, linear polarization, electrical resistance, and field signature method

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 19

Corrosion Inspection Techniques Table 7.1 describes common techniques that should be considered for the detection of internal corrosion in water injection pipelines.

Table 7.1: Corrosion Inspection Techniques Options Inline Inspection Technique Magnetic flux leakage is the most common technique Comments Effective method to accurately determine location and severity of corrosion Inline inspection can find internal and external corrosion defects The tools are available as self contained (free swimming) or tethered The pipeline must be designed or modified to accommodate inline inspection To run a tethered tool inspection it is often necessary to dig bellholes and cut the pipeline An evaluation must be done to determine potential corrosion sites prior to conducting NDE The use of multi-film radiography is an effective screening tool prior to using ultrasonic testing NDE is commonly used to verify inline inspection results, corrosion at excavation sites and above ground piping Practical limitations of NDE methods and the factors affecting accuracy must be understood

NonDestructive Examination (NDE)

Ultrasonic inspection, radiography or other NDE methods can be used to locate metal loss in a localized area

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 20

Options Video Camera /Boroscope

Technique A visual inspection tool to locate internal corrosion

Comments Used to locate and determine the presence of corrosion damage, but it is difficult to determine severity This technique may be limited to short inspection distances Can not directly measure the depth of corrosion pits

Destructive Examinatio n Physical cut out of sections from the pipeline

Consideration should be given to locations where specific failure modes are most likely to occur

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 21

Leak Detection Techniques Table 8.1 describes common techniques that should be considered for the detection of pipeline leaks caused by internal corrosion in oilfield water pipelines. Proactive leak detection can be an effective method of finding small leaks and mitigating the consequences of a major product release or spill.

Table 8.1: Leak Detection Techniques Technique Production Monitoring Description Volume balancing or pressure monitoring to look for indications of leaks Comments Changes in volumes injected or pressure can indicate a pipeline failure This is a more effective tool for finding large leaks and ruptures Accurate flow meters and specialized software can be very effective for liquid pipelines Provides full time unmanned reaction to possible leaks Indications include water on surface, soil subsidence or erosion, or vegetation discoloration Can be used in combination with infrared thermography and flame ionization surveys Need sufficient volume of escaping water to create an identifiable temperature difference Normally completed using aerial techniques Equipment is portable and very sensitive, pipeline has to be displaced to a combustible gas Equipment may be hand held, mounted on an ATV, or mounted to a helicopter Capable of detecting pinhole leaks that may be otherwise non-detectable

Leak Detection Systems Sophisticated leak detection systems using meters and SCADA software can identify leaks and automatically shut down pipelines

Right-of-Way (ROW) Surveillance Visual inspection by ground access or aerial surveillance to look for indications of leaks

Infrared Thermography

Thermal imaging is used to detect temperature change on Right-ofWay due to escaping water

Flame Ionization Survey Electronic instrumentation used to detect very low concentrations of gas

Odor Detection

Odorant detection using trained animals and patented odorants

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 22

Repair and Rehabilitation Techniques Table 9.1 describes common techniques used for repair and rehabilitation of pipelines damaged by internal water injection pipeline corrosion. Prior to the repair or rehabilitation of a pipeline the appropriate codes and guidelines should be consulted, including: CSA Z662, Clause 10.10, Permanent and Temporary Repair Methods CSA Z662, Clause 10.11, Temporary Repair Methods CSA Z662, Clause 13, Reinforced composite, thermoplastic-lined, and polyethylene pipelines

Table 9.1: Repair and Rehabilitation Techniques Technique Pipe Section Replacements Description Remove damaged section(s) and replace Comments When determining the quantity of pipe to replace, consider the extent of the corrosion and as well as the extent and severity of damage or degradation of any internal coatings or linings along with the condition of the remaining pipeline Impact on pigging capabilities must be considered (use same pipe diameter and similar wall thickness) The replaced pipe section should be coated with corrosion inhibitor prior to commissioning or coated with an internal coating compatible with the existing pipeline

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 23

Technique Repair Sleeves

Description Reinforcement and pressurecontaining sleeves may be acceptable for temporary or permanent repairs of internal corrosion as per the limitations stated in CSA Z662

Comments For internal corrosion it may be possible in some circumstances for the damaged section to remain in the pipeline as per the requirements in CSA Z662 Clause 10.10 along with proper corrosion control practices to prevent further deterioration Different repair sleeves are available including composite, weld-on and bolt-on types. The sleeves must meet the requirements of CSA Z662 Clause 10.10 A variety of materials are available with different temperature and chemical resistance capabilities Impact on pigging capabilities must be considered Polymer liners may eliminate the need for internal corrosion mitigation, corrosion monitoring and inspection Reduction of inhibition programs may impact the integrity of connecting headers and facilities constructed from carbon steel

Polymer Liners

A polymer liner is inserted in the steel pipeline The steel pipe must provide the pressure containment capability

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 24

Technique Composite or Plastic Pipeline

Description

Comments A variety of materials are available with different temperature and chemical resistance capabilities Freestanding plastic pipelines may be limited to low-pressure service Impact on pigging capabilities must be considered Composite or plastic pipelines may eliminate the need for internal corrosion mitigation, corrosion monitoring and inspection Reduction of inhibition programs may impact the integrity of connecting headers and facilities constructed of carbon steel Must be pig and inspection tool compatible Refer to Section 4 Recommended Practices in this document for details Ensure that when replacements in kind occur, the alteration or replacement of the pipeline allows for proper mitigation and operating practices to be implemented

Freestanding composite or plastic pipe can be either plowed-in for new lines, or pulled through old pipelines This pipe must be designed to provide full pressure containment

Pipeline Replacement

Using internally coated steel pipeline systems with an engineered joining system should also be considered

The alteration or replacement of the pipeline allows for proper mitigation and operating practices to be implemented

June 2009 Recommended Practice for Mitigation of Internal Corrosion in Oilfield Water Pipeline Systems

Page 25