Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
This publisher provided but modified set of slides is intended to guide ones reading before lecture. Refer to the Unit-guide [Unit Schedule p.14] for the reading particulars. As one would expect, no attempt is made in the lecture to deal with each of the slides in the set. A sub-set of slides will be displayed and discussed. Therefore, access to the handout version of the set of slides, in either soft or hard copy, will assist with note taking during the lecture and study for assessment tasks.
Copyright 2011 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
1(75)
Learning Objectives
1. 2. Assess the relative merits of two-period projects using net present value. Define the term competitive market, give examples of markets that are competitive and some that arent, and discuss the importance of a competitive market in determining the value of a good. Calculate the no-arbitrage price of an investment opportunity. Show how value additivity can be used to help managers maximize the value of the firm. Describe the Separation Principle.
3. 4. 5.
2(75)
3(75)
4(75)
5(75)
Analyzing Costs and Benefits Suppose a jewelry manufacturer has the opportunity to trade 10 ounces of platinum and receive 20 ounces of gold today. To compare the costs and benefits, we first need to convert them to a common unit.
6(75)
Analyzing Costs and Benefits (cont'd) Suppose gold can be bought and sold for a current market price of $250 per ounce. Then the 20 ounces of gold we receive has a cash value of:
(20 ounces of gold) X ($250/ounce) = $5000 today
7(75)
Analyzing Costs and Benefits (cont'd) Similarly, if the current market price for platinum is $550 per ounce, then the 10 ounces of platinum we give up has a cash value of:
(10 ounces of platinum) X ($550/ounce) = $5500
8(75)
Analyzing Costs and Benefits (cont'd) Therefore, the jewelers opportunity has a benefit of $5000 today and a cost of $5500 today. In this case, the net value of the project today is:
$5000 $5500 = $500
Because it is negative, the costs exceed the benefits and the jeweler should reject the trade.
9(75)
In evaluating the jewelers decision, we used the current market price to convert from ounces of platinum or gold to dollars.
We did not concern ourselves with whether the jeweler thought that the price was fair or whether the jeweler would use the silver or gold.
Copyright 2011 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
10(75)
11(75)
12(75)
13(75)
14(75)
15(75)
16(75)
17(75)
18(75)
Ch 3.5 No-Arbitrage and Security Prices Valuing a Security with the Law of One Price
Assume a security promises a risk-free payment of $1000 in one year. If the risk-free interest rate is 5%, what can we conclude about the price of this bond in a normal market?
PV ($1000 in one year) ($1000 in one year) (1.05 $ in one year / $ today) $952.38 today
Price(Bond) = $952.38
19(75)
The opportunity for arbitrage will force the price of the bond to rise until it is equal to $952.38.
20(75)
The opportunity for arbitrage will force the price of the bond to fall until it is equal to $952.38.
21(75)
Determining the No-Arbitrage Price Unless the price of the security equals the present value of the securitys cash flows, an arbitrage opportunity will appear. No Arbitrage Price of a Security Price(Security) PV (All cash flows paid by the security)
22(75)
23(75)
24(75)
Determining the Interest Rate From Bond Prices If we know the price of a risk-free bond, we can use
Price(Security) PV (All cash flows paid by the security)
to determine what the risk-free interest rate must be if there are no arbitrage opportunities.
25(75)
Determining the Interest Rate From Bond Prices (cont'd) Suppose a risk-free bond that pays $1000 in one year is currently trading with a competitive market price of $929.80 today. The bonds price must equal the present value of the $1000 cash flow it will pay.
26(75)
27(75)
The NPV of Trading Securities and Firm Decision Making In a normal market, the NPV of buying or selling a security is zero.
NPV (Buy security) PV (All cash flows paid by the security) Price(Security) 0
NPV (Sell security) Price(Security) PV (All cash flows paid by the security) 0
28(75)
The NPV of Trading Securities and Firm Decision Making (contd) Separation Principle
We can evaluate the NPV of an investment decision separately from the decision the firm makes regarding how to finance the investment or any other security transactions the firm is considering.
29(75)
30(75)
31(75)
Valuing a Portfolio The Law of One Price also has implications for packages of securities.
Consider two securities, A and B. Suppose a third security, C, has the same cash flows as A and B combined. In this case, security C is equivalent to a portfolio, or combination, of the securities A and B.
Value Additivity
32(75)
33(75)
34(75)
35(75)
Under the Value Added Method, the sum of the value of the stakes in all three investments must equal the $200 million market value of Moon.
The Oxford Bears must be worth:
$200 million $37.5 million $70 million = $92.5 million
36(75)
Chapter Quiz 1. What is the Law of One Price? 2. What is Arbitrage? 3. If a firm makes an investment that has a negative NPV, how does the value of the firm change? 4. What is the Separation Principle?
37(75)
Appendix: The Price of Risk (cont'd) Risky Versus Risk-free Cash Flows (contd)
Price(Risk-free Bond) PV(Cash Flows) ($1100 in one year) (1.04 $ in one year / $ today) $1058 today
39(75)
Risk Premium
The additional return that investors expect to earn to compensate them for a securitys risk. When a cash flow is risky, to compute its present value we must discount the cash flow we expect on average at a rate that equals the risk-free interest rate plus an appropriate risk premium.
Copyright 2011 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
40(75)
41(75)
If we combine security A with a risk-free bond that pays $800 in one year, the cash flows of the portfolio in one year are identical to the cash flows of the market index. By the Law of One Price, the total market value of the bond and security A must equal $1000, the value of the market index.
Copyright 2011 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
42(75)
43(75)
Risk Premiums Depend on Risk If an investment has much more variable returns, it must pay investors a higher risk premium.
44(75)
45(75)
46(75)
47(75)
48(75)
Risk, Return, and Market Prices When cash flows are risky, we can use the Law of One Price to compute present values by constructing a portfolio that produces cash flows with identical risk.
49(75)
Figure 3.3 Converting Between Dollars Today and Dollars in One Year with Risk
Computing prices in this way is equivalent to converting between cash flows today and the expected cash flows received in the future using a discount rate rs that includes a risk premium appropriate for the investments risk:
50(75)
51(75)
52(75)
53(75)
54(75)
Arbitrage with Transactions Costs What consequence do transaction costs have for no-arbitrage prices and the Law of One Price?
When there are transactions costs, arbitrage keeps prices of equivalent goods and securities close to each other. Prices can deviate, but not by more than the transactions cost of the arbitrage.
55(75)
56(75)
57(75)
Ch 3 Appendix Quiz 1. Why does the expected return of a risky security generally differ from the risk-free interest rate? 2. Should the risk of a security be evaluated in isolation? 3. In the presence of transactions costs, why might different investors disagree about the value of an investment opportunity?
Copyright 2011 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
58(75)
59(75)
60(75)
61(75)
62(75)
63(75)
64(75)
65(75)
66(75)
67(75)
68(75)
69(75)
70(75)
71(75)
Textbook Example 9.13 (contd) Figure 9.4 Possible Stock Price Paths
72(75)
73(75)
Lessons for Investors and Corporate Managers (cont'd) Implications for Corporate Managers
Focus on NPV and free cash flow Avoid accounting illusions Use financial transactions to support investment
74(75)
The Efficient Markets Hypothesis Versus No Arbitrage The efficient markets hypothesis states that securities with equivalent risk should have the same expected return. An arbitrage opportunity is a situation in which two securities with identical cash flows have different prices.
75(75)