Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Roslyakov
and L.A.
Chudov,
Editors
NUMERICAL IN
METHODS
GAS DYNAMICS
(Chislennye metody OF v gazovoi PAPERS dinamike) OF THE STATE UNIVER_SITY
OF THE MOSCOW II
Izdalel'
Universiteta
Translated
from
Russian
Israel
Program
Translations
NASA F-360 TT TT 65-50138 Published Pursuanto anAgreement ith t w THENATIONAL AERONAUTICS ANDSPACE ADMINISTRATION, U.S.A. and THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON, D.C.
_)
Translated
by Z. Lerman
Printed
in Jerusalem Binding: K.
by S. Wiener
Monson
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
I.
STEADY
GAS
FLOW
G, S.
Roslyakov
and G.F.
Telenin. CENTER
SURVEY GAS
WORK AT THE
OF MOSCOW
UNIVERSITY
L.A.
Chudov
and V.P.
ROUND-OFF ..............
SOLUTIONS EQUATIONS
OF BOUNDARY-VALUE
PROBLEMS
U.G.
Pirumov,
V.A.
Rubtsov,
and V.N.
Suvorova. WITH
EXHAUST
NOZZLES
PHYSICOCHEMICAL
REACTIONS
G.S.
Roslyakov
and N.V.
Drozdova.
NUMERICAL CONE
COMPUTATION
OF 41 /
FLOW PAST
A SCALARIFORM
............
T.G.
Volkonskaya. JETS
OF SUPERSONIC
AXISYMMETRIC 51 _J
BOUNDARY
LAYER
L.A.
Chudov.
REVIEW
OF BOUNDARY-LAYER CENTER
STUDIES
AT THE . 57 J
OF MOSCOW
STATE
SHORTCOMINGS
OF CLASSICAL
BOUNDARY-LAYER 6,5 /
..................
74
V.M.
Paskonov WAVY
BOUNDARY
V.M.
Paskonov
and Yu. V.
MELTING ...........
OF VISCOUS 85
/
Starova.
BOUNDARY
LAYER 94
/_
CRITICAL
iii
Bulatskaya, and F.P. Vasil'ev. NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF A BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEM FOR THE SYSTEM OF NONLINEAR INTEGRO-DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS BOUNDARY LAYER .................. OF A HYPERSONIC I0_ f _..J
III.
VISCOUS
FLOW
A.L.
MODELS ...............
FOR EQUATIONS
OF
.// 114 , (J
A.L.
OF FLOW
BETWEEN 121%1
A.L.
Krylov and A.F. Misnik. STABILITY OF VISCOUS TWO ROTATING CYLINDERS ...............
FLOW
BETWEEN 123
/
L.A.
Chudov
and T.V.
Kuskova. FLUID
APPLICATION ................
OF DIFFERENCE FLOW
SCHEMES . 132 /
TO COMPUTATION INCOMPRESSIBLE
OF NONSTATIONARY
OF VISCOUS
IV.
SEEPAGE
PROBLEMS
B.M.
Budak and F.P. Vasil' ev. IN THE RAY METHOD PROBLEMS .....................
CONVERGENCE AND ERROR ESTIMATES FOR THE SOLUTION OF SOME SEEPAGE 145
EXPLANATORY PERIODICALS
LIST
OF ABBREVIATED IN THIS
NAMES
OF INSTITUTIONS
AND 166
APPEARING
BOOK
..............
iv
I.
STEADY
GAS
FLOW
gas
This flow
article carried
reviews the computational out at the Computational 1957 and 1962. The
University
between
workers of the Institute graduate and graduate organizations, and the project was headed by This article is those of completed present collection.
of Mechanics of Moscow State University, understudents of the University, members of other regular staff of the Computational Center. The Academician G. L Petrov. nature _accounts and the of which results given are published are mostly in the
NUMERICAL BY
THE
COMPUTATION METHOD I.
OF
GAS
FLOW
Potential of
with
of
plane of the
the Mach number M over the increasing function M=[(x)with I'(O)=0: [(C)=Mo, x being the computation characteristic been tabulated: is made BC by the the up to
nozzle axis (in the form of a monotonically a piecewise continuous derivative; ]tO} =l, coordinate along the nozzle axis}. The method critical of characteristics section. SLdx series from the straight have of nozzles
Mo:I.506; 1.75; Mo=4.5; 50) 8; M0=4(0.5 ) 7; Mo_8, 9, 10; ,14o=10(1)20; Mo=lO(5) 25;
I0;
Ig tg tg tg tg
ratio
of
specific
heats
_ was
taken
as
1.4
for IV
series
I-
V,
and
5
3
for and of
VL Nozzle allowance
series II-Vl have a region of conical flow characterized by the angle 80. The part of the nozzle contour from the sonic line to the conical region is common in all these series. Series II- V differ in their conical angle e0. 8
C FIGURE 1
C FIGURE 2
L. V, Pchelkina, of conventional
V.
/2/
give flow,
tables and a
point, at the
plane transitional surface The fan of rarefaction Goursat problem AC of the fan and
A and
the
conditions boundary
by the method of characteristics. proceeds from a series expansion coordinate*. Reference an angular point, covering
/2/ is the first part of an atlas of conventional the following range of parameters:
M 0 = 1,4(0.4)3;3(0.2)5; y = 1.I (0.02) The computational L, V, Pchelkina and the To facilitate principal
method and the programs V. A. Rubtsov in /3[. of the atlas, functions ratios
M, 0 < :4 _
7, for
following
1.18; 1,20; 1.22; 1.25; 1.3; 1.4; 1.67. /5/ tabulated conventional nozzles procedure BC (Figure of symmetry. 3)
V. K, Solodkin
with an angular point and radial outlet is similar to /2/, with the difference is a characteristic Nozzle contours of sonic have been Mo=5, U, G, Pirumov of supersonic and annular
flow. The computational that the characteristic pole O' on the axis
8o=0.01;
developed angular
a straight
See Katskova O.N. and Yu. D. Shmyglevskii. Osesimmettichnoe sverkhzvukovoe techeni svobodno rasshiryayushchegosya gaza s ploskoi pover_nost'yu perekhoda (Axisymmetric Superlonlc Flow of Freety Expanding Gas with Plane Transitional Surface). -- Vychislitel'naya matematlka, No. 2. 195'/.
line. Nozzles with coplanarangularpoints(Figure4), aswell as nozzles with displaced angularpoints(Figures 5 and 6) are considered. Computations are made by the method of characteristics. It is shown that the the annular nozzle same critical is shorter than section area and a conventional the same M0. nozzle (Figure 2) with It is also shown that
displacement of the lower angular point {Figure 5) may increase the number M0 at the nozzle outlet in comparison with the M0 of an annular nozzle of the Displacement nozzle enables comparison annular Rubtsov, same critical of the upper section angular area point which (Figure has coplanar 6) lowers angular points. the M0 at the to lower 2 in of point several V.A.
outlet. The use of an annular nozzle with a displaced the nozzle length to be reduced by a factor of close with the corresponding by conventional nozzle. U.G. nozzles are given and E. Vo Sorokina E. G. Mezhibovskaya, /71.
Tables Pirurnov, G
0'
0 C FIGURE3
FIGUI_ 4
C G
Ax/s of symmeu T
.... HGURE 5
A_
sonic no
in
[6/
and
/7/ to
linear
with
M = 1.001
introduces
computational
An approximate method is the flow in an annular nozzle, exact method in regions far A large series at the Computational of computations Center.
the out
Eddy
N. V. Drozdova
neartheturningpointonthe generatrixofthe body,the solutionis expanded in a Taylor seriesin terms of oneof the unknownariables. v
Jet boundary
FIGURE 7
Computational = 2.2, for M= 2.6, 2.594, results 3, .3.42, 4.097. are 4.098, applied jet the given 6.103, for and a cone for with aconewith
FIGURE 8
8, = 20, _,=
82 = 35 , 15 ,
for
82 = 35 ,
T. G. Volkonskaya /9/ computation of a supersonic the outlet pressure exceeds "suspended" compression described for computing in determining the shock accuracy of the tions are made teristic AB.
in the stream. A procedure is shock. It is shown that the errors have a negligible effect on the of results the flow are up given. to some Computacharac-
3.
Computation
for
U. G. Pirumov,
V. A. Rubtsov,
computed
nozzles
with an angular point {Figure physicochemical reactions. mixture, it suffices to know density computer essentially {for constant and is then does not entropy). applied differ
2) taking into consideration equilibrium To compute the flow of an arbitray equilibrium the tabulated dependence of pressure on This dependence is approximated in the method of characteristics, from the method of characteristics in the which for an ideal
gas. Reference /10/ discusses the flow of real gases in nozzles of given contour and computations are made of nozzles with uniform and parallel outlet flow. For one given gas composition, the effect of real gas properties on the coefficient of momentum and loss in the nozzle is studied, a neglecting friction. N. V. Dubinskaya, procedure characteristics, gas mixtures reactions. air flow. and
R. A. Gzhelyak
I. V. Igonina by
/ 11 / developed
In view
large volume of computational to steady axisymmetric gas of the computational Computational Center and computation computer. A./L for the STRELA
works applying the flow, much attention work. of Moscow State developed
method is paid
to the proper organization During 1957, at the G. S. Roslyakov, of of standard programs ideal gases on the for routines.
University, a system
V. M. Paskonov,
Deeva
]12[
potential flows library includes nodes of the and "also several has been written for an for easy standard
computation of flow parameters at the inner grid, at boundary points of various kinds, One common part of the working memory programs have been A provision is made
allotted to all the subroutines. The arbitrary ratio of specific heats V. referencing subroutines stored For memory mutual
of the subroutines from the main program. Any of the (and also the common part of the working memory) can be in the computer storage. are adjusted in the computer (SSP-2)*, which also ensures for computing turbulent gas flows V. M. Paskonov and L. V. Pchelkina of potential Center flow of of ideal gases State on
anywhere
each application the subroutines by a special compiling program referencing of the subroutines. by of subroutines was developed for the computation
1131.
Standard on the programs electronic computer of the Computational Moscow
University were developed by R. A_ Gzhelyak0 E.G. Mezhibovskaya, L. V. Pchelkina, and V. A. Rubtsov /14/; for computation of equilibrium real-gas flow, by V, A. Rubtsov and V.N. Suvorova /15/; and for nonequilibrium Besides typical Goursat, Center. The flow, by N. V. Dubinskaya, R. A. Gzhelyak, and I. V. Igonina ]16]. of the programs discussed in /12-16/ (programs for computation points), programs for the solution of typic-_l problems (Cauchy, mixed problem, etc. ) are also available at the Computational experience gained in the solution of particular subroutines of programs. a cylindrical the Mach s). Elers**: p and offer some In angle problems shortens showed the time
that
of the library compilation and preceding functions /13/, used, variables as works in /12, also the
B (in are
more and
in /16/ of
pressure nature.
remarks
a general
See Zhogolev, E.A. Sistema programmitovaniya s ispol' zovamcm biblinteki podprogramm ( A Programming System with UtiliZation of a Subroutine Library ).-- In: "Sittema a_rtomatizatsii prograrnmizovaniya", N. P. Trifonov and M.R. Shura-Bura, editors. Fizmatgiz, Moskva. L961. ** See Elers, F.E. Method of Characteristics for Isoenergetic Supersonic Flows Adapted for High-Speed Digital Computers. [Russian translation. 1960.]
1 To estimate accuracy the numericalsolution,integral . the of controlis generallyemployed, the lawsof conservation checked. i.e., are Whensolvingproblemsof this particular class, it is mostconvenient to checkthe lawof massconservation.In computations usingthe method of characteristics,the flow rate is determined everygrid point. The at flow rate alonganystreamlineis conserved. Therefore,if the flowrate is known somestreamline,the (relative)deviationfrom this valueat for otherpointsof the givenstreamlineobtained the computational in procedure servesas anintegralcheckof the accuracy the numericalsolution. of Flow-ratecontrolis usedto someextentin the solutionof all problems. Oftenthe lawof conservation f momentum alsochecked.This o is momentum controlis applied,for example, hencomputing w nozzleswith uniformoutletflow andplanetransitionalsurface /1--7/. In this case,
the the x-axis check by the momenta difference of the on the at the outlet and in the momenta pressure computations these obtained control with forces the inlet of the nozzle should be equal to the nozzle between also are easy projection to compute; on the accuracy divided the generally the points in acting on the is the difference outlet. procedures, grid it is spacings. advisable This, to compare is however, contour. these An values
momentum
at nozzle different
for one or two variations of the problem, mainly with the of choosing the optimum characteristic grid spacing, while computations are controlled using flow rates or momenta. The unknown quantities are determined at characteristic grid of second order with all the interpolative are also the of second order respect to the and quadrature {_ccuracy. grid spacing. formulas used
the machine time required problem, etc,, will be When computing computations angular point of a the position as to maintain are A.
given for a particular the fan of rarefaction made along 2nd-family The intervals points on the uniform family
/2/ (see section 1). OAC, Figure 2), the issuing angle from the at point A and are chosen so
of the
with
accuracy. When computing the nozzle contour and To check compute the the x-axis. variation the computations projection of Here are some (M = 10) on the of points: _lCof of points OAC ACB,
cannot be used for control purposes. of conservation of momentum, we forces along the nozzle contour on describing the computation of a certain computer of the sonic characteristic, number Computational 160 on
of characteristics
in region
CB, 120. Computer time flow-rate accuracy, 0.01%. momentum accuracy, 0.01%.
the
contour AB several intermediate Along these lines the forces of pressure, and some quantities essential for computed. suitable for The results along quadratic interpolation.
IL
INVESTK_ATION WITH
FLOW WAVE
PAST
BODIES
computation of supersonic flow past for the construction of algorithms and in a varying This degree on the solution of is due to the relative R has been demonstrated problem is proper, provided class of solutions with problem the for being application Laplace's
based
the Cauchy problem in an elliptic domain. simplicity of the ensuing numerical methods. that for linear eUiptic equations the Cauchy some a priori considered*. L. A. Chudov of difference equation, has been convergence proved. Studies restrictions /17/ schemes which is used demonstrated of the in this studied to the are imposed
on the
some solution
problems of the
connected Cauchy
as the model problem for one important class solution being to the continued
in gas dynamics. Stability of explicit schemes, and exact solution has been
by L. A, Chudov
and of gasthe
dissociation
consideration).
h be
initial line and along the normal to it, respectively. analysis of /17, 18/that it is advisable to employ of a high order of accuracy in l, so that ! can be reduced of lines in a certain sense. For for the solution of partial /19/ computed the subsonic flow region. case
made as
G. P. Tinyakov
transsonic regions beyond a shock wave for supersonic bodies whose generatrix has no angular points in this used is essentially the method of lines, adapted to the
strips need be taken, Systematic computations were made for flow past a sphere for Mach numbers of incident flow M_= 2 (1) 8. 10,oo, and a ratio specific heats _/= 1.405. The problem was reduced to integration rays of a system of ordinary compression shock compression shock The position which were sphere were of the chosen satisfied differential equations along three radial to the surface of the body. The generatrix was approximated by an even fourth-degree shock on the three so that the boundary for the three rays gave conditions from the of the polynomial.
rays
simultaneously.
See, for example, Lavrent'ev, M.M.--Izvest/ya AN SSSR, _riya [r_tcmaticheskaya, Vol. 20, No.6. 1956; DAN SSSP_ VoLll2, NO.. 1_7; alloPucci, C. --RencLAcad.Naz.Lincei, CI. Sci.Fi_.Ma., Ser.VlII, VoL 18, No.5. 198.5.
path chosen enabled the singularities arising with the DorodnitsynBelotserkovskii method* to be avoided; this simplified the computational procedure and the program. were automatically selected by the computer. on the STNELA computer; machine time for 1 minute. The integrals of the gasThe three free parameters The computations were made one variation was
on the average
dynamics equations not employed in actual computations and also the integral law of mass conservation, written for mass flow through the rays, were used to estimate the accuracy of the numerical the variations computed, the error in all the relationships solution. For used was less
than 0.I 5 %, which corresponds to the approximation accuracy of the partial differential equations in the program. The effect of ray position and the growth of error owing to distortion of the shock along were studied (no essential growth of the error was observed). shows, as an example, the computed shock wave on the number M,. G. F. Telenin flow in subsonic flow past dioxide. formulas dependence the ray Figure 9
of the separation
of the
and G. P. Tinyakov /20, 21 / computed and investigated the and transsonie regions beyond a shock wave for supersonic immersed in an equilibrium stream of air and carbon in
a sphere
The thermodynamic functions were approximated with the of A. N. Kraiko (for air) and V. V. Mikhailov (for CO2), which accuracies employed.
the entire range of p and T ensure The method presented in /19/ was of the flow past the sphere temperature, and pressure pt=10-s--I arm for air and carbon dioxide. Itwas shown that when into consideration, were
made
for a wide
of the incident flow: M, =4-- 50, T,=250 -- 1500 K, M,=2--35, Tl=250-500 K, p,=10-4 --1 atm for physieochemical reactions wave in the gas are taken
the separation
of the shock
geometric pattern of flow varies nonmonotonically flow pattern depends little on p, and substantially
parameter shaping the flow in the subsonic and the transsonie regions is the density increment in the direct shock. As an example, Figure 9 shows the separation of the shock values of Pland T, G. F. Telenin wave as a function of M, in air for different /22/ investigated the applicability of ellipsoids, and
and S. M. Gilinskii
the scheme described in /19/ to computation of flow past also to computation of low supersonic flow past a sphere. G. S. Roslyakov and L. A. Chudov /23/ propose
the method
of steadying
for the solution of the problem of flow past a blunt body. Applying the difference method they find the numerical stationary solution for the corresponding nonstationary problem (starting with arbitrary initial data). The steadying of the solution is achieved by a special choice of difference ("viscous") shock wave. The problem schemes, and also by dissipation which reduce of energy on the of
is solved
in coordinates
the domain
integration to a time-independent rectangle. The shock wave coincides with the coordinate line and serves as part of the boundary of the domain. The numerical procedure which is dividedintotwo possesses stages. In the first stage, a "rough" using Lacks' scheme, considerable "viscosity",
* See Belotserkovskii,
O.M. -- Vychislitel'naya
matematika,
No. 3. 1958;
solutionis
computation arbitrary the integration
the
initial
wave).
inside
P: ann
T, eK
o IL;!
:tV____ *
_ o LO
v IJ ,JI 0, _=
u,,
II
I._.._
:
&
? lJ
fr, a
FIGUR
second
stage
the
solution
is
rendered
more
accurate.
Two-layer
schemes accuracy
"half-integer"
temporal subsequent
obtained
application
4#
ItSL
0
"-"
! I:I_tU_ 10
In systematic computations omitted. Given a solution for certain Mach number /M of the second order of I. G. Belukhina solution by dimensional
of the procedure may be known shape and for a we may apply the scheme values of schemes M. for the
of
problem was obtained from gas-dynamic coordinates) by replacing the transverse lateral derivatives along one of the rays a known solution. The effect of various of the As first solution an stage was studied. Figure procedure) I0 of illustrates pressure example, of the
equations (in spherical velocity component and all the with the corresponding values from factors on the rate of steadying the along process the axis of of steadying symmetry. (in the
BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. SOLODKIN, skotostei 2. PCHELKINA, tochkoi 3. PCHELKINA, i programm --Otchet 4. 5. Tablitsy from V.K. (Tables L.V., (Axisymmetric L.V. and and G.S. of Nozzles V.A, ROSLYAKOV. for Supersonic and Tablitsy Wind V.M. sopel Tunnels). dlya aerodinamicheskikh --Otchet VTs MGU. trub 1961. sopla MGU. s uglovoi 1963, metoda sverkhzvukovykh
an Angular
March Opisanie
Osesimmetrichnye an Angular
toehkoi, of Method
Description
and Programs).
gazodinamicheskikh 1,05 to 1.67). L.V. na VTs vykhode MGU, and --Otchet and V.K.
funktsii VTs
dlya MGU.
ot March
1,05
do
1.67
for nym --
1963.
SOLODKIN.
Radial
6.
PIRUMOV, (Computation
U, G.
Raschet
kol'tsevykh seriya
sopel meklmniki
V.A. of Annular
RUBTSOV, Axisymmetric
and
E.V.
Raschet VTs
Nozzles), of Flow
Numerical
Computation
a Scalariform
of and
Supersonic
Axisymmettic
|ets,
-- This
volume, Exhaust
of Axisymmetric -- This obtekaniya Angle 1962. podprogrammy the Solution volume. tupogo by the
Allowance R.A,
Equilibrium
11.
N,V.,
GZHELYAK, relaksatsii
ugla Method
metodom of
Allowance
12.
A.A.,
Standartnye for
dlya
resheniya of
of Problems
VTs
MGU.
13.
PCHELKINA.
Standattnye
podprogrammy
dlya
resheniya
s rasehetorn Subroutines
osesimmetrichnykh with 1960, V.A. RUBTSOV. dlya for VTs dlya Gas the MGU, EVM Computation
of Nonisentropic
of Ideal
PCHELKINA, gazovoi
Electronic 1961.
Computer
V.N.
rascheta Equilibrium
ravnovesnykh Flows).
techenii --Otchet
(Standard
Computation
L.A.
Ch_ulov
and IN
SYSTEMS
Introduction gas flow problem range past a blunt for /1/. systems in the body by the
compressible
so-called inverse method leads to a Cauchy of equations, which is elliptic in the subsonic
a nonlinear 11 is well
system known
that the Cauchy problem for elliptic equations and is "improper n in the sense that small perturbations lead to round-off numerical large disturbances in the errors are inevitable methods to these have solution /2/. in numerical problems
Since both truncation solutions, the application should applied involve in some large recent
improper been
3, 4, 5[ to the solution of methods were empirically yielded feature as we of round-off see solutions of the from errors
a blunt body. Some of the unsuitable for this object, accuracy method cited, spacing error is used is the is sufficient for all of
only such grid spacings greater than the truncation of A correct improper and generally model evaluation problems the made problems in
which give a round-off error should be used. much The parameters theory theory, To
substantially case
of these errors is than in proper ones. of lattice the This form. by applying /6, 7/. its present
more significant in the choice of difference for proper problems schemes to does not apply apply difference
determination
to
problems
(e, g., in inverse body with separated of the gas convergence the /4]), of
shock wave allowing for physicochemical we must at least devise some simple the approximate and the round-off In ]8] application the to solutions errors. a certain to the exact
truncation in its
convergence
of the model
difference
Laplace of
12
16,
N.V.,
R.A.
1GONINA. Subroutines
podprogrammy Computation
dlya of Real
rascheta Gas
17,
CHUDOV, Solution
resheniya Problem).
Koshi No. 5.
Method
foe.the
18.
CHUDOV, Problems
Errors volume.
Difference
of Boundary-Value
F4uations G.P.
19,
tel
20.
TELENIN, vozdukha
TINYAKOV. of Supersonic
sfery NIl
21,
TINYAKOV.
Ratchet
sverkhzvukovogo Equilibrium
sfery Flow
(Computation MGO.
of Supersonic December
1962. sverkhzvukovogo Bodies with obtekaniya Shock tel s otoshedshei Wave). --Otchet udamoi NIl
22.
(The
Separated
23,
L.A.
Raznosmyi of Problems
metod with
rerheniya Separated
zadachi Shock
ob
oroshedshei --Otchet
udarnoi VTs
Solution
Wave).
24.
BELUKHINA,
Graduation
thesiS.-
MGU.
1962.
ii
the
boundary
values
under
a suitable
a priori
restriction
of the
class
of
considered difference of
convergence
problems choice of
rational
spacing
important class of difference schemes. for the model problem discussed in 181. coefficients yield of gas dynamics tentative (see /4/). estimates of
problem
2.
The
Model
and
Convergence
of
Consider equations,
a Cauchy-Riemann
system
of
-_-y =-
a--F; _----__
(I) (2)
(3)
a solution
SuS(x,
0
y)rLr._,M s,
(0_9,-._10.
(4)
4--1
k-
k_l, we
2 .... shall take above b_ = O.d, equalities. = O, i. e., Because drop of each (I), (2), the of this second sum When shall
right-hand
of the
proposition,
independently problem
other. (3), we
u(x,)= _ (x) o
13
as on
initial
condition v(x,y)
and will
will thus
seek only
the
dependence an auxiliary
of
u(x,y) role. an
function
play
It is easily operator,
dk =0, we transforming
Theorem 1. Boundary-value problem (1),(2),(3) is proper in the sense of Tibhonov under a priori proposition (4). The continuous dependence of the solution u(x,y) on the initial function _(x) = u(x,O)follows from the estimate
z
_<
I.,(,,,
Estimate transforming (6) is exact. into It follows u(x,y)does from not this u(x,0) constitute
o)i.,.,)'-+.
estimate that the operator linear as we may a continuous
if the two functions u(x,0) and u(x,y) space L_(0,n). Applying the a priori norm for the initial values:
(7)
Then.
taking
I1_11 sup =
O,ll_Y
u,(x,y)dx,
(8)
we
obtain
from explicitly
(5)
an the
estimate a priori
which
is uniform
in the
norms
and
does
not
contain
propositions:
llull_: ll'PnoTo of should basic u(x,O) evaluate in the know to the what effectiveness degree of difference of initial a solution (4) is specified values of problem by the schemes and (1), and (2), (3) the influence errors, satisfying initial we the values errors determination of round-off
approximate
m=l,2 in the
..... values
N--l; of
h=--_-. u(x,y)
"
the grid rectilinear norm
(9)
grid
on
0 _<y-(.Y,
introduce
a suitable
14
N--1
Theorem 2. Let u(x,y) be a solution of problem the a priori proposition (4) and meeting the additional b, _0, (k= 1,2,...). Construct the function
N--I
k--I
where
_, are
obtained
from (m_
initial-value
+ w _w-'_,,
(lO)
,_- r- u;, v=
--1
,f.
We now proceed with the discussion of the results which have bearing on the stability and convergence of difference schemes. We shall only consider two-layer schemes. The grid is assumed rectangular with constant spacings Ax = A, &y = z, where z = _(h) and T(h) --* 0 as h --* O. For two-layer difference schemes, we define a norm of initial values by analogy with (7) :
n_|.,=
M--I 6--1
Y, &_',
_m = (mh)
{ _'_sin/tmh
},
(k----1,2 .....
N--l).
if for
to be stable
in
(11)
where
K is a constant
independent
of h.
15
For
difference
schemes
having
a solUtion
of the
form
u_ = u (mh, n_) = s n(k; h) sin krah, = v (mh, n_) = sn (k; h) cos kmh, we have values: directly from (11) the necessary condition 0 ,_ nx _ Y. of stability (12)
in initial
Is n (k; h) [ -_ KekV; The inequality Is" (k; h)l_.<Kek_; will be stability called the of several 3. have the strong condition of difference schemes Let a two-layer of solutions of stability
O..(n_=y_<Y stability in initial is investigated difference of the form scheme, (12) with values. in /8/. for _= any The
(13)
integral
a system
let
strong
condition that
(13)
assume h -_ O
condition h) = + lns(k;
is
satisfied: (14)
uniformly
in every
finite
e--(N+D,I
+ M
Mj(h) inequality
is
uniformly (4).
bounded
on
the
class
of
solutions
satisfying
expediency of using schemes Indeed, two conclusions can we conclude that if the exact the The the the function initial u(x,g) values is determined thus carry
with a high order of accuracy relative to h. be drawn from (10). First, setting y = 0 initial values u(x,0) are known on grid (9). on this grid with exponential a very large information content be utilized scheme. as thoroughly Second, the as form accuracy. as regard possible of the in
16
side
so-called scheme
u_,+' -- u.
"_
1
h q----p
(15)
h q_p
The
coefficients
are
defined
as
a'_') = (--
1)q-1
(p
--
q)! q to'-]-
_!_
q)!
; a_ ) ffi 0.
degree p. 128)
2p taking that
values
It is known tt
/.(x,+th)
+ t_-
=I,+
I,+
_,!_+...+
i_1 0f___-b (16)
z_a--_
q. t,<t,-where
I)<t,--_J...lt,--(p--l_!/_o, (_):
_ ...
3 fo +'--
+ (--
1)_-'
+ (_ 1)p-_
/_-_ page
[,,,, we obtain the coefficients of _)for some schemes q and of a[p' = O. (15). Let
The
table
scheme
_f.=f.+,--_.,
v/. =/,.--
f.-_.
17
Symbolic notation
Truncation _rtor
R is
easily
seen
that
the
following
equalities
apply:
h,f'(x_)_+(A+V)[|---_.,
(AV)-+-...+
+ (__ 1)__ , [(p-- 1)!1' (AV)P-' 1[m= (2p-- J)_ j To setting investigate / = u + iv: the stability of scheme (15),
Lcp)fm"
we
write
it
in complex
form,
C, ' -r_ + 7
(We return It is easily to our ordinary seen that notation:
t . = -_ L_pI.,.
f_ = l(mh, m. ) Let [_ = Is (k, h)l"e -lkmh.
V) e "-ikmh
= (---
_---
i sin coskh)
kh
e-_k'm';
e-_mh; -I e ''i'm_'.
2 (l -2)q -I
(1 --
coskh)
Hence,
setting
s (k, h) = %,
we
p
have
s_ = 1 + --
---" sinkh a
E q-I
2q_i
-1 =
p---I
= 1 + ---_sinkh_
h q-0
(2q +
ql
l)!!
(1 --cosl_h)q.
18
Let
us
study
in more
detail
the
expression
H = _n=
"0
where
==/_.
(18)
Substituting
x = sin--%, 2
we
obtain
from
(I 8)
H = 2x
l_t-_--_--_] _
q-O
q! 2VxSV t2o+1)!!
It is
known
(see for
/12/;
appendix follows
to Chapter directly
I
8, S 5) that from
the
series
_q! q=0
I x_ < ! (this
D'Alembertts
criterion),
being (l--x
Therefore
H = 2 arc sin x.
This
signifies
s_ = srr= _: (1 + tk) _ < e_w. This proves Proceeding inequality from (13). these results scheme
we (15):
can
easily
calculate
a simple
implicit
scheme,
obtained
from
q----p
q----p
"e'-:=,
[
q.---p o q_p P ----p # _--p
(19)
for
inequality (19)
p
(13)
applies
in this
case,
too.
Indeed,
(l -- cs kh)'-']
s "(2q
19
According inequality
to
the
preceding
sp < s.
1-F
kx +
1 -_
k2x _, and
since
the
is
satisfied
simultaneously
the in
validity initial
of values
the
last (13) if
inequality we set
proves K = 1.
the
strong
condition
of
stability
4.
Choosing
the
Grid
Spacing
with Errors
an
Allowance
for
Round-Off
section errors
we for
shall two
estimates
of truncation
and
to Theorem to
of the
truncation
error
is equal
of magnitude
M max
k
e-k_ I 1 -- e-(k-kTY
[.
Taking order
error
the of
ratio magnitude
of
this is hi,
error we
to obtain
the
value of the
of
11u(g)][_, relative
whose truncation
R = max e-kn
k
[ 1 -(15)
We Then
shall k
now sinka h
estimate and
for
scheme k--k->
p =
1.
We
first
set
= 0.
consequently
Further
I -- e-(_-_v =
(k -- k) y
2!
Y' + _
V" --...
Suppose Leibnitz's
that
at point on
k, where
R is maximized, decreasing
(k--k)y series we
_< 2. obtain
Applying
theorem
alternating
n < (k - _) ye-_.
We further have = h 3_ 5_ + ....
Let
from
LeiDnitz's 3 k = --,
theorem
k--k<
k'h,
6
andR<R,
e-k,
k,h,
6
u.
R3 is
maximized
at
so
that
h.,y _'
(20)
in
initial will
values be
(rounO-off assumed to
calculations
2O
off. by M, as
norm due to
of this
_o maxe_-_
k
inkh
= _.e _
h ensures that the truncation error
If
For
a given
y, the
optimal
grid
spacing
and the error 6(//, h) both of optimal spacing gives particular Let us 60 = 10-a; inaccuracy scheme in
have the same order the maximum accuracy for a given 60. example. the relative e = 10-2.
of magnitude. attainable
question
obtain
1 (]3.8)s '_-"
(21)
Setting
0 =
y--, we r
have
(21)
' Hence
.___
r 0 _ 0.67 and h = --. 21 result can be summed small only up as follows. When using scheme (15) with of 10-= for h_ r---.
This
_, a relative error of the order up to O= 0.67; correspondingly, (15) with p = 2. For this scheme
scheme
ss-----1 + c (--_-_sinkh
With
_ = 0 we
have
Estimating
R as
we
have
done
before,
we
find
that,
for
Ph 2 < 42:
R<Rs = e-_-_-
_/Ph
y_-_
625
e -'--_ y.
(22)
21
The
maximum
growth
is
max exp
h\3 for
6 60 = I0 -s, e =
Equating calculations.
5(y,h)
with
Rs
_ = 0.73, h = Y-Y-. With this 14 thus be obtained for higher corresponding p = I. This discussed we have x-interval example in 3. calculated
required 0 than
1.5
times
advantages
schemes
quantity
as the
estimate
relative
truncation
error
for
different
y.
The
results
the validity of the (22) and enable the for the values of values =
these for
accurate permissible
maximum problem
consider have,
c_<l.
For
scheme
with
p = 1we
provided(k_
sufficiently
small,
(k--_) sinkh h
--_-ln(l
+ csinkh)
-T
We shall not attempt c from of the to derive condition (20)) parts an accurate that at the Then,
+c
estimate point for of the
.
of_s(c maximum given ). Instead Rs (see k = __3, h c----_.-. we shall
c---- -_.
frequency We find
h take
in the truncation
error. c_
other
values
estimated
= m7
q-i
(2q-
l)l
(, _
= max 2 _
a z...a q--I
a(P_sin aq
q
and
a,_
is
the
value
of
a at which
maximum
is
reached.
22
the two
neglecting figures may single schemes of use only. result correct with equations implicit
the
errors, of round-off
we
could errors
The in a
dynamics,
highly
complex,
schemes.
5.
Estimating
Grid of
Spacing Gas
for
Certain
Problem
Dynamics
us making
consider due
of
supersonic
flow
past
a blu_z
inverse of at the
flow shock
parameters wave.
the
statement /4/. Let wave, Let system wave /4/we by density; flow equations the of and
of
centered symmetry r ,= r(z); distance shock of wave. the different (x,y) along of
shock
pointing shock
normal
denote u, v
components; by p the
component pressure;
y,
respectively;
p the
The
then
have
=' AI
., v(t + KI/)
o,_ ox
. '
(1 -
Z, 2 ....
.'9
(23)
_-
=*(x,y,
-_ ..... _
..... -x;'
_"
u,v .....
"i .....
",/_
-- '
"
(25)
@y
i-FKy
ax
o#
j '
23
ae
#p
r oy
j
I-Iere-_---/-1
"--._or1 ; r
r
(27)
(28)
p=p-_-"
, where .,tI is the of the M I is the of rate molecular parameters weight of the respective
gas
flow
u, v, o, P, T, a_..... aj
for the j-th mixture component; and u, v, p, p, T, a_ ..... % Iinear in the derivatives the difference However, of these method, schemes although schemes the (15) author and (19) of
by by
/4/
difference
which are clearly hyperbolic, unstable (in the ordinary sense a/ lack schemes. therefore the smoothness System solved required (23), which using a stable
application
high-order
(23*)
where to=J_2.__,
1 + Tk
k----const,
y=2Bn+'l.
m+'lm
_* ,
h*
B=
v(l + Ky) In some problems, allowing it is expedient to calculate and Ax = h*. on the partial In what of for the particular nature of the functions these functions using a fine auxiliary grid scheme equations propose use Let of the the (23*) of a method boundary wave is stable, we gas dynamics for determining conditions be described can proper, a given by
a/,
withAy = z* concentrate i. e. , (24)-(28). tentative on the Let the the the our
h which
a specific
shock
equation r- arc cosh (z+l). In the new coordinate system shock wave, functions K = K (x) and r = r(x, y) depending shock wave particular appear example in the equations of our gas-dynamics
ln[x+
(1 + xg'/,l--
(1 +xg-_xy.
the
24
Equation
(25)
then
takes
the
4
form
--ov
7 -+
1-1
al dr
\ o
"
I--I
_,
=j_,+
+,-, --'r'--+.,,.
The the enthalpy coefficients of the derivatives, point of the shock wave. equations with constant
_+_u
ox
function can
calculate (23)-(28}
reduce
(3Z)
To these equations we now previously considered for the solution w(z, y} we write
apply model
().
IP l,-,_
't
(33)
expressions
(33)
for
the
derivatives,
we
obtain refer
a systeL,_
of
ar_. -- s (k, k) e'_'_. Here Then m _ == w (mh, n_), and a --- kh. (-_-)" ,__e_'= _('--'_)
P
_,
25
In the following
we
notation
#-l
In conjunction with system (A), we shall also investigate a simple system obtained by eliminating p (see /3/) and keeping P constant. We shall later justify our The terms functions (29)-(31) quantity assumption that p changes very little along the y-axis.
0-LP can thus be regarded as a coefficient. Rewriting the #x a2,bs,c_,d,. etc. in equations (29)-(32) to bring out the desired sought to the for set a=u __aai ____ au _ (e. g., b, aa--_P bi = b_ v; z + c, = c_u), we reduce the system
i t-,, av
. _;o,-_ =0 _
Oy
(36)
ox
o. +b.4o=O"
the
For
system
to have
a nontrivial vanishes.
solution
u, _, it Expanding
is the
necessary determinant,
and we
sufficient have
determinant
+[
Seeing that _ = ch, c =const, also contain /h =const,
+..,,,
we a factor neglect _; then all quantities for a small
"' w =o.
/,= z.=_j which, h we have beside
1)' +
26
In dropping form
the
right-hand
side
of (38)
we
neglect
an
expression
of the
(39) SLnce
from our analysis of the model problem), estimated as C-r, where G is uniformly bounded side of (38) zero and setting
in
leR-hand
Z_
se
obtain
+
(40) we similarly obtain
=,+ (ave-- b=-- d_b, b_) z' + + + [=,(a,-- b,-- d,b,)+ b_ + c,_ (b,+ d,_)-- _ -- c_(d,b,--d_)
We shall equations. now give some results obtained The coefficients of equations
=,-(41)
solution of these are calculated from
= 0.
by numerical (40) and (41)
the boundary values on a shock wave at points z= 0.02, For cubics and quartics with complex coefficients terms are taken into consideration), with = 0.007, for x=0.02, y= O,
zt_-----O.Ol31
l-
!.0429
of this table, we should concentrate roots which has the greatest modulus. of the new four equations (29)-(32), in comparison as information with
27
the
three for x# to
the
roots omitted
of
the
come
Cubic
(40)
Quartic
(41)
zh2=0.0192 i 1.0417 z8 = -- 0.2514 z4 = 0.309. 10-9 zl, 2 = 0.0299 +_ i 1.0448 z3 = -- 0.4327 z4 = 0.258. 10-y
We We
now have
can
estimate
from
below.
z=a+ib= it -h
s--I p E
q-I
2a_aV' sinaq
Since
P
[s(k,h)
l"
-_
]l-T-b-_--_,2a_P'sinaq_q=l P
P
q_l
l<
b E
2a(P)Sill aq,
should
pick
out
from
the has
roots the
of greatest Y/h
(40),
(41) bm_.
the In error
root our
imaginary We than 4 of
determine of 10 6. paper,
so
round-off
does
According
_2a# p,sinaq =
4-1
sina _
0-I
1.8374
for
1456
2 8
of
of these is
problems
show from
/3/ the
that shock
with wave.
Y_0.09--0.11
APPENDIX*
1%
First
c -_ 0 (_ = 0L
We
consider
the
behavior
of the
relative in 4 scheme
Then,
if
7=
{}Y,
.q---- Y_y=
(l --O)y,
-- e(i--*_q == e-_1-_)Y[I--e
-_('t" th--*h)],
SO
Rz(O) = e---_z-_=_ [ I - e2_'_'-=_l. Analogously, and grid size in calculations v h -----=--, we 14 have with a five-point scheme (15) with p = 2
results values
and
the v.
various
are
the
of
justify and
the assumption imposed five-point schemes and fairly case accurate. discussed for c=
estimates 2 . Table
with the aid of R are c:_ 0 (T_ 0). For the values we of have
in 4 I_. 7
R:(v)calculated
h._- V-_,_Y 21
1,50
See
4. for max followed R/,and by the max signed Rl(i_3-.Sl, exponent. each group of four digits gives the manu=a of a decimal
* * In columns number,
29
CO
t_.
C'_
O0
t.O
cO
CO
C_
......
....
I
E
ooI I
__ I
o I
Lo
J
8
3O
TABLE
c = ____=!
7 0 max R, (c) max _ (c)
FIGURE
for y= 0.667Y
we have
for
31
The and
error the
Rafc)in form
calculations
by
scheme
(15)
with
p =
R8 (c) = e-_
[ ! --
-_Y_ [In(t+csinet)--k_]
].
Seeing
that
"r = ch,
y = ,bY,
x _
Y -:=-:, lbO
we
have
Rs (c) = e -al-s_21
[ 1 --
el$00[InU%cslna)--ca]].
Figure
2 shows
graph
of
this
error
for
_=
0.667.
Note
that
2 max Rs (0) t
= 0.01675,
Rs(c)and
R3 (0) maxima
are
comparatively
BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. 2. 3. VAN DYKE, M. The Problem of Supersonic Flow Past a Blunt Body. PETROVSKII, I.G. Lektsii ob uravneniyakh s chasmymi proizvodnymi Equations).--Fizmatgiz, Moskva. 1961. [Translated into English, [Russian translation. 1958.] (Lectures on Partial Diffeeential Interscience. 1955.]
MILTON, D., M, VAN DYKE, and HELEN GORDON. Supersonic Flow Past a Family of Blunt Axisymmetric Bodies.--National Aeronautics and Space Administration, American Research Center, Technical Report R1, Moffet Field, California. 1959. LICK, Vol. W. Inviscid Flow of a Reacting 7, No. 1. 1960. Mixture of Gases around a Blunt Body. --Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Flight
4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
VALIO LAURIN, R. and A. FERR1. A Theoretical [Russian translation. 1959.] RICHTMEYER, R.D. Wiley. 1958. Difference Methods
in Supersonic
Problems. (The
-- (Interscience) Stability of
RYABEN' KII, V.S. and A.F. FILIPPOV. Ob ustoichivosti Difference Equations).--GITTL, Moskva. 1956.
uravnenii
CHUDOV, L.A. Raznostnye metody resheniya zadachi Keshi dlya uravneniya Methods for the Solution of the Cauchy Problem for the LaPlaceEquation). No. 4. 1962. TIKHONOV, A.N. Ob ustoichivosti obratnykh Vol. 39, No. 5. 1943. LAVRENT'EV, M.M. Doctorate dissertation. BEREZIN, Moskva. COURANT, l.S. and N.P. 1959. ZHIDKOV. Memdy zadach (The Stability 1961. (Numerical
143,
of Inverse
-- DAN SSSR,
Novesibirsk. vychislenii
Methods),
Vol.
I. -- Fizmatgiz, London.
R. Course of Differential
and Integral
Calculus.
Part I. Blackie
32
U. G. Pirumov,
T _ CA,.,,..,[3 T
V.A.Rubtsov, AXISYMMETRIC
and
V.2_.
Suvorova NOZZLES
Several
works
on the
equilibrium
gas
flows
by
the
method
of characteristics have been recently is adapted to the flow of real gases, contours with uniform and parallel calculation velocity. of different is given of a flow of real However, gases these works in a nozzle of
/1--3/. In /1, 2/ the method are given on nozzle nozzle exit plane. In /3/ a a given axial distribution of
do not consider the problem of the flow given contour and hardly touch on the the coefficient problems, the of momentum Computational losses Center gas ensuring in flows point
effect of the real gas properties the exhaust nozzle. To study of Moscow in a nozzle uniform (Figure were and State University of given contour parallel exit considered
on these
undertook calculations of equilibrium and calculation of nozzle contours flow. and Axisymmetric the effects nozzles of viscosity with and heat
an angular
1) were
computational of equilibrium
results, gas
Since no shock
composition of gas with given stagnation parameters we can find an isentropic line, S = const are allowed in the nozzle, then for every particular and a function giving the variation of pressure with density FIGURE1. with
Axisyrnrnetric an angular point
along
this
line,
p = p (p).
These
functions
nozzle
can be obtained by thermodynamic calculations of the equilibrium gas state, making due allowance for dissociation and recombination processes. (e.g., been for Many tables of thermodynamic air, see /4/). For some compositions /5/, which enable the function along the line s = const for given most gas compositions of practical the p= isentropic lines P0 and this
'
functions even
are
now
available have
_--_dlagrams
published
p = p (p) to be calculated stagnation parameters. interest, the variation of of without difficulty. Given a tabulation stagnation expression parameters), p = p*av+
can
be
tabulated the
P-- , where
p0 are by
approximate kay=
In--_'-a
the density
lnpa
Pa is
33
to the were
density coefficients
in the
and as,
corresponding
a0, a, and
approximating _is
passes at all
derivative
The acteristics
p was case
the method of chargas flow, does not differ for isentropic ideal gas
in principle flow.
the
method
of characteristics
As the dependent variables we used The equations of the characteristics describing equilibrium isentropic gas flow are written in the of a gas form dr dx Consistence equations along d_ + the
of differential
equations
of thermodynamic
- _d-_ p(_,+l)
Here angle
x, r are of
Cartesian
flow
plane;
inclination
_= V_-1;
The First from to be variables Let us first
_=
first flow
"
p* and p* in the critical M = 1. Then, taking the the x-axis, the fan
of expansion
arising
angular point A (Figure 1) is calculated. wave fan, the sonic characteristic is in a series in terms of the characteristic that being the ratio to of specific heats of the equal
When calculating the expansion determined by expanding the solution coordinate /6/. It is assumed flow near the sonic line is constant,
the expansion wave fan, we .40 and the nozzle contour. calculated surface S,the on the flow characteristics rate xp and
p-
expansion x projection on we
forces acting on and at the nozzle function is 1.207. I. The values margin nozzles p = p(p) In the formulas to within is
the considered
kavfOr to this
following
we
for p = p(p) used inthe calculations 1% in pressure and 0_% in velocity, of thermodynamic first nozzle (No.
data. 1 contour)
Flow
34
was calculated second nozzle characteristics) with k=1.25. nozzles. 1.185, in the
ideal gas with k =1.14. exactly (by the method flow I was with 1.25,
The of
and parallel outlet gas of composition flow of an and with ideal gas k= 1.14,
for an ideal gas calculated for both k = 1.114, 1.33, and 1.14, 1.4
0f
OG 6_ -$ _5
-5
/'
/
a_
I
_3
/
,/
o O
FIGURE
"IbL_0
-!
2. In p vs p for composition I
kP
FIGURE the
3.
Var/ation
of
a along
nozzle
axis for
gases
The
solution
of the
mixed
problem
(flow
between
the
characteristic
and
the nozzle contour) in the second nozzle, was obtained by the method of characteristics applied to the Goursat problem and calculated to ensure uniform and axisymmetric exit flow of an ideal gas with ratio of specific of ideal identical integral gas with heats h_ 1.25. To evaluate its accuracy we calculated gave difference the flow gas with parameters k-----1.25. The results of this calculation in both eases. For example, the virtually in the flow of ideal near
P in the two calculations was 0.05%. When calculating the k I 1.14 in the first nozzle, the characteristics intersected
the axis (see Figure 1}. We nevertheless succeeded parameters at the contour, because this intersection characteristic DC. No such intersection was observed The intersection of characteristics can be attributed first nozzle calculated by approximate exactly. calculations, while the
in calculating the occurred below the in the second nozzle. to the solution of the second nozzle was
35
tf_.
J u,
:.-.-M._.t65
73
Composition I _:t.33
J
0
FIGURE 4.
2.5
Pressure
5
integral Curve P on --No.
Z5
No. 1 contour
to
for
t2 5
various gases.
t5
Lower
i contour
We now proceed variation of a along that for the variation an ideal gas of with
interesting gases.
to compare Figure 3 shows variation The 4 shows ratio of I is closest the difference 3--4%. heat specific We shall parallel losses _ is
the
angle a for composition k = 1.25 (for composition No. 1 contour increases integral
of the integral over the nozzle momentum and that the pressure integral of the two of the loss interest.
that,
specific of the
on momentum losses momentum losses due of the outlet flow. from the formula The
F- is
the
area
of the
given
by
the
area critical
of the
_ the
velocity
For
ratios,
_! = where
the
momentum
36
flow
whose
critical-section
area
and
flow
rate
are
equal
aM
[
,.-o_ I _,_Jr.tt5
O02
00/
......
FIGURE 5. Coefficient of momentum gases loss _ on No. 2 contour for various
Figure
5 shows
the
variation
of
_ along
the
contour
for
the
flow
of
in the second nozzle. Examination of this figure reveals noticeably with the decrease of the specific heat ratio. in this coefficient for gases with kffil.33 and k ==1.14 is of _ of 3other hand, gas difference and to is due 590. the with in,in to the For smaller _ the difference in losses k =1.25, the fact for range that _-values of high in this difference between not losses k= is
as
high as 1% for values 0,2 to 0.690. On the composition is a mere I and 0.1%. about ka, being The 0.490, equal
an ideal
exceeding
greater, from
range (see
1.14-1.17.
in the No.
2 contour therefore
with
the outlet
untruncated contour, _ drops to zero at the last point for k= 1.25. A gas with other k will not give a uniform and parallel flow at the nozzle outlet, and therefore the curve for k =1.14, which at first is below the curve for k = 1.25, become It is reaching which valves but for differ intersects greater than it at a certain for k =1.25 point, from this so that point the losses for Figure k =1.14 5). but on (see
also interesting to compare the coefficient the same point, which have been calculated carry the same of k =1.14 and gas. These contours are k =1.25. The coordinates
This fact was also emphasized such contours and for different by 0.390. Note that _ can be
to within
37
7-
a"
6' 3 2 t
the same
Besides we flow to and gas plotted also for 0.270, the with in
flow contours
of
gas
in
nozzles and
of
given parallel outlet these flow and end lines of contour not exceed
contour, outlet a equal nozzles of 0.208 for these end lines ideal are
0.231,
uniform to
contour
I and for ideal that the difference I and will having be for an even
5--10%. T with
smaller
composition
k =1.207.
/S I
.............
Contour end line for nozzles calculated for uniform and parallel flow
cr.OZ
_a
__ 208
0 0
FIGURE 7. Nozzle
_ I0
contours calculated
I 20
for uniform and parallel (composition T) 1"); -----ideal
. 30
flow of ideal
_0
gas (_ = 1.25) and real gas
2:
_real
gas (composition
38
We
have
the for
effect
of real
gas
properties nozzle
on the size.
loss
of
momentum calculations evaluate various momentum have been velocity for be generalized the
Given
for real gas with real gas properties Consider the choice length. nozzles area or given for designing
and parallel flow, we can choice of nozzle size in ensuring maximum methods exit easily present
a nozzle
In /8, 9[ variational which ensure maximum area. flow of These a real methods gas.
can In the
work, however, the basic comparison is made for a family of nozzles constructed using uniform characteristics. It can nevertheless be expected that the estimates of losses due to incorrect choice of nozzle size by failing to allow for the real gas apply to nozzles properties obtained in the above case will also If constructed with the aid of variational characteristics.
we neglect friction, then among nozzles of given exit plane area maximum exit velocity is found in the nozzle with uniform and parallel flow. Insofar as the contour end lines of nozzles with uniform flow for composition I and for ideal gas with one point _re k = 1.25 are similar, also similar, and the losses of contours to solve with uniform reaching it is sufficiently accurate for a family of nozzles
problems of given outlet area by solving flow calculated for some constant k.
FIGURE
8.
points
Consider
the
problem
of determining
the
size
of the
nozzle
with
maximum of of
momentum for a given length. The nozzles with uniform characteristics from this figure that the maximum a gas with sometimes k = 1.25 reaches
choice of this nozzle from is made from Figure 8. momentum Pm_ of a real gas
39
the from
of
the of to area. we
be
made
with
fair
by
constant of a nozzle
k = kay. ensuring
results exit
apply
surface
observe
that of
our
results
on loss these
the
effect
of obtained
the
real for
coefficient
momentum
apparently requires
this
BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. KATSKOVA, O.N. Ob osesimmetrichnom Expansion of a Real Gas).-Zhurnal No. 2. 1961. KATSKOVA, O.N. gaza (Calculation i Matematicheskoi svobodnom Vyehislitel'noi rasshirenii real'nogo gaza (Axisymmetric Matematiki i Matematicheskoi Fiziki, Free Vol. 1,
2.
and A.N. KRAIKO. Raschet osesimmetrichnykh of Axisymmetric Isentropic Real-Gas Flows). Fiziki, Vol. 2, No. 1. 1962.
3. 4.
GUENTERT, E.C. and H.E. NEUMANN. Design of AxisymmetricExhaustNozzlesbytheMethodofCharacteristics Incorporating a Variable Isentropic Exponent. -- NASA, TR, R-- 53. 1938. PREDVODITEI_V, A.S., E.V. STUPOCHENKO, A.S. PLESHANOV, E.V. SAMUILOV, andI. ROZHDESTVENSKII. Tablitsy termodinamtcheskikh Functions of Air). -- Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, Moskva. funktsii 1959. vozdukha (Tables
B.
5. 6,
SINYAREV, G.B. and M.V. DOBROVOL'SKII. Zhidkestnye rakemye dvigateli (Liquid-Fuel Engines). --Oborongiz, Moskva. 1955. KATSKOVA, O.N. and Yu. D. SHMYGLEVSKII. Osesimmetrichnoe sverkhzvukovoe techenie
7. 8.
rasshiryayushchegosya gaza s ploskoi poverkhnost'yu perekhoda (Axisymmetric Supersonic Flow of Freely Expanding Gas with plane Interface). -- Vychislitel' naya Matematika, No.2. 1957. RAO, G.V.R. Recent Developrfients in Pocket Nozzle Configurations. -- ARS Journal, No. 11. 1961. SHMYGLEVSKII, Yu. D. Nekotorye variatsionnye zadachi gazovoi dinamiki osesimmetriehnykh sverkhzvukovykh techenii (Some Variational Problems in Gas Dynamics of Axisymmetric Supersonic Flows).PMM, Vol. 21, No. 2. 1957. HUDERLEY, translation. G. and B. HUNTCH. 1956.] Best Configurations for Isoenergetic of Supersonic Supersonic Axisymmetric Flows Adapted Jet Nozzles. to Digital [Russian
9. 10.
of Characteristics 1960.]
Computers.
40
G. S. Roslyakov NUMERICAL A
and
N.
COMPUTATION SCALARIFORM
i. In this article a numerical computation scalariform Circular cone (Figure 1) immersed ideal gas. It is assumed
the incident flow is parallel to the axis of the body, while the flow velocity and the cone angles are such that the flow is supersonic at all points, It is also assumed that the angle of the second cone is larger than that of the first cone, so that a curvilinear jointing line on the surface frontal needle. compression of the body, shock is formed issuing from the as well as the conical shock in the conical the flow
In the region enclosed by the shocks the flow is self-adjusted; flows are tabulated in /I[. Beyond the second curvilinear shock becomes region, turbulent, and To its computation determine is very difficult. The near with the exception of the jointing line, is computed the flow parameters theory were applied. of the flow, we shall origin at the needle point
turbulent
of coordinates, 1).
of the
FIGURE
following
we
confine
the
discussion
to one
meridional
plane
half-angles known,
shall compute the flow shock OA, the generatrix family passing through
conical AB of
compression
41
% shocks. - following p, p, the incident This we should use the and 8, the be adequate for A4,the divided by most Mach the practical number; pressure velocity ratio. polar normal I is In applications. _ , the and the Mach density to the to In the angle; of the x-axis; the
pressure flow;
vector addition
s, entropy; cylindrical at O. By
x, 9,, we the
r, ocentered
denote
radial
radius) A4 by the
components equality*
dimensionless
velocity 2 M*= 1 x+
related
to
The
beyond shock,
the 2.
first
shock
beyond 3. from
remain only
along polar
any
ray
depend
angle
velocity
components equations:
k,,X. satisfy
following
of ordinary
differential
dk__L ),,, = d_ dk d. 1 kr+ ),. etg _, 2 k2 7.+1 " x+l ),2 (1)
1 ----
System
(I) will
be
integrated
for
the
following X.=O;
boundary
conditions: (2)
solution
must
satisfy
X,X.tg o,,
Given
X, and
k. from
the
solution
determine
-_-
(5)
e(),) =(l--_'--lk2/*-'x_
'
and
p,, and
p. are
determined
from
the
conditions
on
the
conical
shock:
Allunreferenced
formulas
in the text
/2/
or are easily
derived.
42
x+
m x--
x--F ! I _2.,._inainl_ w
(6)
#w =
4. is
As
we
have by
observed, of of
the
flow
beyond
the
curvilinear
shock
form
d_y#= tg (0 + a), dx _I) -_-dO+ 1 +cos2_da -- x--cQs2a and 2nd + sinOsin, dx--T- sin-------_ da=O -- y cos (O ::h a) 2x(_t-- 1) families), a_" = tgO, dx ds=O (7)
(characteristics
of
1st
of
3rd of
family the
-method
We
shall (the
not
dwell
on
the reader
interested formulas
e.g.,
in
only
give
for
computation the
compression
% = +
(8)
where
27.
* --
u-t-I --
P,=P(_)
2 x -- 1 + Ms (_) sins t
x-]
g=x,(_).[I [ P(') + _, d
--
1)sin'
_],
g is to
the the
angle
of
the
flow,
and
o the
inclination
angle
of
reIations aIong
be
supplemented characteristics.
with
a condition
which
is
43
special
computational the
procedure angle
is applied 6 is known:
near
the
jointing
point.
At
deflection
6 = L02-- c0,;e
is determined
where
tg_e
-{- Atg2_
+Btg_
4" C = 0,
'
2 M s (_t) -+ --I 2
M' (_i) -+
x--I
A = C[1
-- M _(oh) L
all
the
unknown is
are in the be
from
difficulty As the
wall,
found
meet i). To
the
generatrix the
of the required
second
cone
at point
determine
parameters
at point
pressure
at point
a, using
the
expansion
Pa_Pe+(--_y)=AY where
(_dp_\ }2 = -ay
Kt K2 = _-
= _
tg (_ --
_), _) cos_l,
[sin _ -t- tg (_ --
1.
a =2tg(e--S)_I1 b = 1+ + (_ -_) (1 + __--1 B_] *B1, I] ,
tg _ tg
M_) --
B, = M_sin2(_--_)Itg_tg(e--_)--
(here Formulas
P2, M2, in
e, this
and
6 are form
taken were
at obtained
the
jointing by
point, by
beyond a method
the
shock). analogous to
Mel'nikov
44
that other
employed quantities
in
/4,
Chapter a : e_ = _,
IV/.
We
can
now
easily
determine
all
the
at point
s_ = s,,
where
Given (8}
the
flow
parameters
a,
we
can
compute
the
shock
point
from
of equations
of conical
Runge-Kutta method. To solve the boundary-value problem (1)--(4) at the left end point, with co = _, the value of _r was varied so that for some _0 = _ equations (3) and (4) were satisfied simultaneously (with pre-established accuracy). caw was assumed to be the conical-shock angle. In practice, the conical-flow by solving 2-3 _2(_0) and since _ (c0_) is approximately known (from could be determined with the problems. tabulated as the tables in /1/), required accuracy calculations, _. curvilinear from the a point parameters initial-value
As the result of these functions of the angle the beyond the 2nd family computing_
for
System (8) should be solved simultaneously with the equation _+=O, (see (7)). Let the solution be known at point P on the shock and at points of the characteristic of the 2nd family passing through point P (Figure 2). We find the intersec tion
!
point
Q of the line
passing
through
point
Pat
an
quadratic
conic flow parameters, find _2(_) and 0(_). From (5} we compute p(_) and p(_). Now from (8} we find the parameters beyond the shock at points Q (for a = op -k Ao). We compute with at points the value of $+ by replacing the differentials corresponding difference expressions ! Sm=ZB*_X
2
/i q
i _p
FIGURE
required
quantities
at points
M (for
and _ = ap + Aa--2_g the true position of the required interpolation chosen so that
, respectively} and compute the point N of the shock (with at this point (beyond quantities as functions different signs the of
+ at these points. Now += 0} and the value of shock} $+. Q and the are found by quadratic A_ and A_ are M, flow i.e_ rate so that at this the
at points we compute
45
--
(9)
N.
the characteristic of the characteristic apply points the characteristic (x_, y_),
of the we the
x, y, 0, e, s we
equations
(x2, Y2) on
1)_
In in
cosYdX(0-- ' =)
(10)
by the
trapezoid
formula.
2.Z
/?
r.8 //IV
1.0 _ o)1=20
I
Z5 FIGURE 3. 2.9 3.3 3.7 q,! 9.5 , Compression shock and boundary characteristic for various Min data (see Table 2); 0z=20; 0_2=35 Circles mark experimental .
the flow
unknown rate is
quantities computed
rate one
a point on the body. In practice, body, an integral accuracy check on the generatrix of the body.
since we compute from the shock to the will be that the flow rate does not vanish STRE LA computer at the Computational The results are shown in Figures 3--6 ratio for all the alternatives was of the of curvilinear Min of the shock incident and flow the for values
6. Computations were made on the Center of Moscow State University, and in Tables 1, 2. The specific heat taken boundary as 1.4. Figures 3 and for 4 give different characteristic
graphs
46
bodieswith
obtained (alternative by
and are
co, = plotted
points ;Win= 3
ii
2.2--
/
_d
"
aJ2= 35 1.0 35
FIGURE 4.
I
rn':'51 33
Compression (VII) and
I _.7
and boundary
1
I 51 5.5
characteristic o1=15", 0}2=35 for
_. 3
shock
Min=2.594
Min=4.097(Vl/I);
vr
J
/F ,/
FIGURE
5. second
of the
pressure iointing
over point;
the
of 2)
the
Figure
5 shows
the
(divided
by the
pressure
at the
jointing
high Min a stagnation region forms near the jointing point. the pressure along the generatrix becomes more intense. as computations the shock, the the of graph. Figure g. were made for point of maximum a comparatively pressure Min= rate for small Min=6.1
47
'/
y?
7
f/
VII
_/ 4- Alternative
t 0 ;
VIII Z6 ofy
as a function
Table trend
1 gives
the for
s as small
of
_.
Note (as
the
of entropy a minimum
entropy
a function
of _) has increasing
high
Min
s becomes
a monotonically
function 2,
x, g are
coordinates on the
of the cone
two
is the
pressure flow
second
of the
incident
computed flow
2 give rate
the As
divided already
at the
corresponding
observed,
_)m_xcharacterizes
to a certain
accuracy
of
computations. All the using the alternatives see Section relation, IV" was of results 0.1%, error of all for were 5). computed Since the reduced with shows in all other with pressure near Ax =0.01 (_x the a was point. of flow less exceed rate than _x. the interval computed along
shock,
a linear
exceed The
parameters
apparently
48
on
the
method on the
The
method
described cumbersome.
point
somewhat the first jointing point of values the and first the
substantially be proposed to the Below the shock scheme taken 2.748477 1.001498 0.610496 = 0.548388 s 0.076099 O.004316 as in
reduced in which
o equal generatrix. on
angle we cases
inclination the
point scheme
calculations.
x 2.758477 y 1.016410 0 0.6O6883 = 0.548323 s 0.076086 ,_ 0.047742 We smoothes see that off. the divergence in numerical
2.758477 1.016413 0.6(16882 0.548323 0.076085 0.047752 results is slight and quickly
$- IO_
'
0.000 0.300 0,600 0.900 1,200 1.500 1.800 ! .932 2,100 2.400 2.545 2.700 3.000 3,022 3.300 3,600 3.714 3.900 4,200 4.500 4.597 4.800 5.100 5.400 5.700 5.726 6.000 6-216
II
HI
IV
V!
VII
VIII
2.42 2.30 2.22 2.17 2.13 2.11 2.10 2.09 2.08 2.09 2,10 2.11 2.12 2.14 2,16 2.18 2.20 2.23 2.26 2.30 2.30
3.41 3.36 3.33 3.32 3.32 3.34 3.36 3.39 3.42 3.45 3.49 3.53 3.58 3.63 3.69 3.75 3.77
5.14 5.f2 5.12 5.15 5,18 5.22 5.27 5.32 5.39 5.46 5.54 5.63 5.72 5.75
7.61 7,62 7.65 7.70 7.77 7 85 7.94 8.03 8,14 8.25 8.38
12.9 12.9 13,0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.5 -13.7 13.9 14.0
4.-_1 1K32
4.83 15.66 4.87 -4.91 4.96 5,02 5.07 5.12 5.20 5.27 5.35 5.46 5.55 5.62 16.42 16.43 ------------
49
In conclusion weexpress thanksto V. I. Goryachevor his our f experimental data, andalsosomecomputational resultsof approximate theories.
TABLE 2 *
Alternative
_in
";-
u-
p,
( d_-71 kay/
P_
_max
20 20 20 20 20 20 15 15
3.423 3. 450
3.405 3.347
3. 265 3. 122
] I
4. 743 4. 397
For
all
alternatives,02
= 35 .
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
KOPAL, 194q.
Z.
Tables
of Supersonic
Flows
around
Cones.
-- Mass.
Inst.
Techn.,
Center
of Analysis.,
Rep.
1.
2. 3.
FERRY,
A.
[Russian
translation. and
1953.] N.P. (A SHULISHNINA. Computation nyi Tsentx Opyt of Plane AN SSSR, rascheta and Moskva.
of Characteristics).
-- Vychislitel'
4.
CHERNYI, Velocities).-
G.G.
Techeniya Fizmatgiz,
gaza
s boy
shoi 1959.
sverkhzvukovoi
skotost'
yu
(Gas
Flows
of High
Supersonic
Moskva.
50
Z
T. G. Volkonskaya CALCULATION OF SUPERSONIC AXISYMMETRIC JETS
jet
of the method of characteristics emerging from a nozzle are formulas are given for
calculating
and a general calculational procedure is described. calculating the flow parameters on the compression /2 / mainly deals initial wavelength, with the effect of nozzle and shape and curvature
experimental data and numerical calculations. This work is mostly concerned with subsonic jets or supersonic jets where the compression shock forms far downstream, i.e., cases where the shock need not be calculated. The authors maintain that the method of determination of the shock with allowance for the transient conditions across the shock front of the one are exceedingly shock as the type. of characteristics The present jets. The compression complicated. envelope of the the of one work also They therefore intersection points calculational with the determine the position of characteristics of ignores calculation for the
Correspondingly
type. deals is
focused
on the
calculating
2. Consider an axisymmetric jet emerging with supersonic velocity from a nozzle into a stationary gas (Figure 1). We shall assume the flow at the nozzle outlet to be uniform, having its velocity vector parallel to the nozzle axis. We shall also assume that the pressure of the surrounding medium "suspended" increases compression the flow shock}. boundary problem subsonic is less than the pressure at the nozzle outlet. In this case a compression shock may form with the coordinate x. Near the shock is reflected forming changes from supersonic The compression shock again of jet regions in the nozzle jet, whose axis, the shock intensity dropping axis, and
a direct
on the
from the direct and the free The complete to the presence is to obtain a right of AB, some x, r, to limited by the on its method of
forms a direct shock on the axis, calculation is highly complicated in the only shock. jet. The purpose of this in the The
numerical solution by the first direct characteristics the segment characteristic cylindrical the x-axis;
region bounded by the initial linear axis of symmetry, the free boundary following 0, the angle; notation is employed inclination angle S, the entropy;
throughout:
51
number angle
KOl
C
FIGURE 1
B
FIGURE 2
is
consider a general scheme characteristics of the 1st A, AB or axis the well-known the
The calculation from the initial (Figure 2). are used. as follows. in the At Let shock. we
boundary equations is
is observed,
sequence
of computations
Xk Bk be a part of previously region I.* C_ is the point Starting with characteristic X_+, Bk+,. Then applying find region the point Ck+, on the II a lst-family
construct in region I the characteristic for transition across the shock, point Ca+, As+,. Ca+,we then construct in
From
characteristic
FIGURE
us
a scheme quantities
for
to
a point a point
on the on the
shock
intersection
* Region
last
characteristic
from the compression
with
52
The
gives the flow parameters at point 7 on the side of region IL the inclination o, of the shock, we apply one of the conditions across the shock:
0;- ei+ _
Suppose that poLnt 0 of the
_(e;- [_+21-_o(e_-_+sio4] _
shock (Figure points required the 3b) has already been computed at the
and that the solution passing through this intersection at points of the 1 and
5, 6, 8 of the lst-familycharacteristic point of the shock, 2, lies neighboring are at point it amounts lst-family known. 2 on the to the the The
3 of which
parameters
for the _etermination analogous to that continue the shock the (at side point
3--1 into region II ignoring 0 (assuming the parameters a 2rid-family characteristic characteristic issuing
from
parameters interpolation
at point 2 on the side of region for points 3, 1,4. To determine II, we apply
(D
_--1 sin (0_-o,)]} .2 '
sfa.(o_--_O
x-I]
[,
_,.'4
.-,]
We supplement this system with a differential relationship holding on the 2nd-family characteristic 2-- 7. Writing it in a finite-difference form*. we obtain
(2)
53
sinS;sin=_ t- r, eos(0_-=_
'
0"2, a"2, S"_ in(2)as functions ofo_,we in fact reduce the (1) and (2) to the solution of the equation _ (c_) = 0 onthe We should first seek the segment the of la2, a_ lonwhich t _ _+_ difference and then on o so that between this q)(_2)=0 the segment
root of by
i = l, 2 ..... points
interpolation
a new
cD (_2) vanishes,
.,.=.-------'='_ . I
# 2
o
FIGURE M b = 3.0
t
4. Jet
z
boundary
_
formed
,;
forM0 =2.5, in the
jregion
z
5.
_
Jet
_ 8
boundary
,o ,_ ,;,
for M_3.0, of similar
FIGURE
No shock in
question
ignored
o
FIGURE
_
6. Jet
2
boundary 1.5.
3
and
,
the shock
0
FIGURE
7
_. Jet
2
boundary
3
and line
o
shock gives
for M,=
Mb=2.9996
dash-dot as the
jet with
boundary;
reflected
characteristic
The
numerical
calculations
were
carried
out
on
the
of calculations
object of checking both the accuracy of our work and the accuracy of the results in /2/. Figure 4 gives the shape of the jet boundary for M0=2.5, Mb=3.0. No shock formed in the calculated region of the jet. The results
54
in /2/ calculations shape jet boundaries calculation noticeable when show of in the
are
shown as are closely the were (also only jet boundary obtained ignored. see at is a
We in
see the
graph case.
two 5 line
of
M0 =3.0, crosses A
the
boundary
calculations
intersections boundary in the from ]2/ due this 6. M0= in to results the (marked the This solid
obtained
nozzle by
shock
fairly
The is
is lines
Figure for
figure by
boundary The by
_,e
of The other
between results
discrepancy.
FIGURE 8. Jet boundary for Me = 2.5, Mb = 2.'1 (curve 1); 3.0 (curve 2); 3.3 (curve 3); 3.5 (curve 4); 4.0 (curve 5)
FIGUR_ 9. Jet boundary forMo= 1.6, Mb= 1.8 (curve 6); 2.0(curve 3); 2.3 (curve 8); 2.5 (curve 9); 3.0(curve 10)
FIGURE
10.
Characteristic
grid for _lo= 3.0. Mb= 5.2867. are marked by thick lines
Calculations position Examination determined is the circles determined fan with plot the the of the of very as
to of
effect the of
of
an of
in results. can
the
be origin of the is
The
dash-dot
shock
the
reflected
A similar problems
conclusion
was reached
in/3/
in calculation
of "suspended"
shock waves
in one-dimensional
of gas dynamics.
55
The
difference as no
of the
"points large,
of
is fairly of the
however, shocks
on
the
jet boundary,
both
merge
at a certain
distance. varies with M_ M0 remaining in the region in question. for M0 = 3.0, lines. M b =5.2867, The
8 and 9 show how the jet boundary In all the cases no shock formed 10 gives and the the characteristic shock are marked grid by
boundary
thick
BIBLIOGRAPH'Y
1. WAND and PETERSON. Spreading of SupersonicJetsfrom Axially Symmetric Nozzles. --Jet Propulsion. May 1968. 2. LOVE. E.S., C.E. GRIGSBY. L.P. LEE. and M.J. WOODI/NG. Experimental and TheoreticalStudies of Axisymmettic Free lets. -- NASA, Technical Report R--6. 1969. 3. ZHUKOV, dinamiki Problems A.I. Primenenie metoda kharakteristik k chislennomu resheniyu odnomernykh zadach gazovoi (Application of the Method of Characteristics to the Numerical Solution of One-Dimensional in Gas Dynamics). -- Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta ira. V.A. Steklova, Vol. 58. 1960.
56
H.
BOUNDARY
LAYER
L . A . C hudov
RE TEW OF
THE COMPUTATIONAL CENTER OF MOSCOW
C, IED
STATE
OUTAT
UNIVERSITY*
During problems
some out
of boundary-layer of Moscow State G. I. Petrov with the as well as graduate These studies cover value solved most by
University under the general guidance of participation of workers from some other and undergraduate students of the Moscow a very of them a variety series The wide also of range, have numerical and direct besides applied methods
to a system to the
equations,
expansions, reviewed
I.
SELF-SIMILAR and
PROBLEMS. E. L Obroskova
inblow (hydrogen
argon) strongly differs in its physical properties from the embient gas (air). The binary-mixture approximation was used to compute the diffusion. An exact numerical solution of the problem was obtained for self-similar boundary velocity the plate). problem method conditions proportional The were used of integral on the plate (constant to x-'a where x is profiles in the relations obtained same for in the the surface temperature; downstream coordinate of this self-similar the (in inblow along
solution
particular, with E, L Obroskova statement is also problem works, applying of the self-similar,
constant inblow). and E. N. Starova problem and with regard the solution
for a system of ordinary differential equations. this boundary-value problem was solved by the the forcing function method for the solution of
Lecture
delivered
at
the
Conference
on
Numerical
Methods
in
Gas
Dynamics,
Moscow,
March
1962.
57
equations.
(Third
order
equations
in the stream
function can
conveniently solved by the forcing function method. ) _,',;The next four works are of particular interest in elucidating questions pertaining to the physical statement of boundary-value in many-component A. B. Karasev gases. ]2/ computed the boundary layer near
(atomic oxygen, molecular nitrogen, and silicon on the wall and is entirely inblown into the boundary are "frozen" in the boundary layer. The main
methodic purpose of the work was to compare the results obtained with different representations of the diffusive fluxes. Three alternatives were considered: Wilke's formula, averaged Wilke's formula, and simple binary formula. The solutions obtained in the first and the second alternatives differed insignificantly; the third alternative showed of considerable divergence from the results of the previous two, which indicates the inapplicability of the binary formula for the computation ternary mixtures N. A. Anfimov in a many-component components. The of this kind. /3/ considered gas. gas was the boundary-layer near
Computations were made for the case of five assumed to be in equilibrium at the wall and the layer, while in the boundary layer the reactions
were "frozen". Diffuse fluxes were computed using Wilke's formula. The main methodic problem was to establish the effect of various physical assumptions adopted in the computation of the transport properties of the individual components on the various profiles and the heat conduction. Two interaction models were considered (rigid sphere model, and LennardJones depend atomic problem, that this conservation correcting In active potential). It was found that the results of computations substantially the on the procedure components. namely formula (up this. used in the computation The same work also dealt of the properties of with another methodic
a chemically premises
were are
(and
normal
in every boundary condition. The method the mixed boundary conditions to simplest satisfactory focused on convergence of the the rate of combustion by [5, the author in 6/ investigate
proposed by the author, conditions in every iterative under boundary process. various layer on gas The
iteration, ensures main attention was physical The assumptions two works
discussed of V. I. Stulov
/3/. the
a is
dissociation. of equilibrium
Diatomic dissociation.
Small variations equilibrium, and which are reduced of the atomic "boundary-layer" to zero
characterizing the departure and first approximation are To determine the to construct an varying function
from considered,
concentration
components, solution,
at infinity.
58
P. Vas//'ev of the
/7/ boundary
made layer
gas. to the
This solution
with a parameter, coefficient_ devised so that the at equation forcing differential solved by (series
process
every step only of second order function method. We now pass L P. Sopr-anenko
a boundary-value had to be solved. to the 18/ treatments the wall. The with small in powers with
expansions). by
considered
flow
of an incopressible
fluid on a slightly wavy sinusoidal perturbations represented as a series simultaneous over two waves retained in the by successively These method. equations. ranging linearization
waviness of the wall was described amplitude 5. The solution was of x. The procedure involves to e. To investigate the solution be up to 40 terms must coefficients are determined of linear differential were numerically work can be extended
respect
boundary-value used
problems
of compressible gas, hut, as system of ordinary equations V, Ya. Shkadov /9/ obtained, expansion of the stream
the author observed, the resulting is fairly cumbersome. for the case of incompressible of some
function in terms
dimer_siorless
combinations containing the velocity U.(z) and its derivatives. Analogous, hut more complicated, expansions were constructed, under certain restrictions, for the case of compressible practical use of this method on electronic gas. It is noteworthy that the computers involves considerable right-hand sides coefficients. of the
difficulties owing to the complexity of the differential equations defining the expansion
Series expansion of the solution in complicated problems seems to lead invariably to cumbersome and non-standard computations which are not suitable for electronic computers,
II. Application of the boundary The significance. of difference layer system was
works
mainly
describing
See
Lunev.
V.V.
nyi
sluchai
tla Past
vyazkim an ^xisym-
59
compressible scheme:
many-component
gas
can
be
represented
by
the
following
a___
Out
a [ p);
Oul\--
(i =
l, 2 ..... o
(B) (pv)= O.
o-_(pu) -i-
The
of
in
group the
(A),
i.e.,
a t,
depend
on
the u vertical
horizontal
component on the
components, F t depends, first wall, difference (B), from and scheme. on every derivatives it is
case, to y.
functions at an implicit
vanish
natural scheme
to
stable is
essentially approximated (A), order In studied is used (/3) makes accuracy /10, in ii,
equation stable
(in
y),
difference to iterate
nonlinearity to ensure
of
system
it in 12/,
second-
Chudov,
L Yu. methodic
and
I. I. Gezenko when this features layer, the the results methods. mesh of size scheme of
(choice
the of
study
comparing by by Ma T.
solutions later
other
Ching-tang problems
related of the
boundary basic
that the
the
scheme closely.
separation
calls
iterations to compute v, owing to the unbounded increase Ou derivative _ . In /15, 16/ some procedures of accelerating the of of Landau /16/ numerical for these iterations were computations u, v near formulas the were of using schemes without this continuity other, the separation used to studied. confirm It was the point*. improve functions. 4-th order equations complicating turns (B), and out it is to be in y is of the discussed the type (A) in the numerical computation shown asymptotic in /14/ that the of
convergence results L. D. In by
formulas
suitable The
unknown of
schemes
]15]. with
It
is
shown few
very
insufficient
therefore
some
1456
60
The solution
methodic
investigations, problems
and
also
the
experience
of boundary-value
in two-component
in progressing toward the solution of various particular problems. V. M. Paskonov /17/ developed for the STRELA-4 computer a standard program for the solution of the system of equations (A), (B) according to the difference scheme described in /10, 11/. This standard program can be conveniently used in the compilation of specific programs for solution of various boundary-layer problems reducible to system the (A), (B).
We shall now briefly describe some particular projects. The problem of the two-component boundary layer in the statement proposed by /1 / was considered in /10, 11] for the case of a plane plate and constant inblow, and in /13/, near the critical point. of The steadying. by more converge /18/ The self-similar or The less to the solution solution arbitrary self-similar a liquid system In this is determined in differential at x ffi 0will, /13] by the method equations determined in suitable variables, of partial conditions solution boundary used the system of layer limit
M. G. Merzlyakova and (3. A. Beda on the surface of a truncated cone. of the liquid boundary layer as coordinates the E. L Obroskova compressible The problem stream of
a coordinate
thickness of the boundary layer is and V. M. Paskonov /19/ studied layer with as follows. is fed Inside which combustion A porous through
constant. a many-component in a of
at the wall and radiation. plane plate is immersed the plate, there is the problem which burns is a mixture capable of boundary was layer posed
Hydrogen
emitting and absorbing radiant energy. L M. Soprunenko and V. M. Paskor_v an /8/, was incompressible fluid on a wavy but solved directly, using devoted here to establishing and the separation. T. F. Bulatskaya, layer on the for
in as in
surface.
scheme. The main attention between the magnitude problem a blunt of body /4/, computed in a of the methods: melting
lateral
high-temperature results obtained Wilke's formula V. M. Paskonov of a viscous this problem Interesting steady T.S.
flow of dissociated air. A comparison with rates of diffusion computed by two and Hirschfelder's formula. and Yu. V.Polezhaev /22/ considered near the critical to (A), which is were and obtained point. The then solved the /23/
concerning
E. L Obroskova
computed
a two-component
by a discontinuous the standard difference discontinuous question equations boundary regarding in similar can In
adequate
in the
equations layer.
61
/24/,
V. M. Paskonov
and
S. I. Serdyukova
considered
of on a plate. velocity
component, confined to In conclusion of this different boundary nitrogen, coordinate in directions point flame was formulas front, difference layer on hydrogen,
interval on the leading edge of the plate. we should mention two studies employing V.G. Gromov /25/ considered the mixture of gases (oxygen, in the flame front, A The derivatives using manyseparated regions). by variable) applied layer the
with the flame front was used. to the wall were approximated approximations the points for the regions in the respective
of ordinary equations (in the Runge-Kutta method. to the with problem of constant inblow.
a similar (hydrogen-air)
method
a two-component
SOME
PROBLEMS
OF
THEORY in the previous in /i0[ it was boundary dynamic layers boundary section shown can layer.
solution certain
of some theoretical
For
that the depth of the diffusive be several times greater than This means horizontal that computations velocity component
must be u virtually
the velocity as an is
of inviscid flow u,(x). usually done, from the absurd value. result When
If the vertical component continuity equation, t_en as y -+o%v boundlessly and the diffusive
can have considerable far from the wall. with its conception
boundary
asymptotic boundary layer, neglects the problem "global n approximation, i.e., a solution applying as in the region of main flow. It is easily seen cannot be matched some of the continuously problems boundary with the solution wall. For conception allowances its influence approximations
of construction near the boundary that the asymptotic of inviscid the more flow classical complete
of modern aerodynamics, layer is inadequate, and for the effects of viscosity, flow. The problem arises to viscosity both near
it. The methods available in the literature for matching the boundary layer with the inviscid flow solution are also inadequate, since in the best ease a continuous solution (without continuous derivatives) is obtained for u(x,y) only, boundary layer. L, A, Chudov, L. A. Lyusternik, e --V'T for the case while v(x, y) remains the procedure zero and first discontinuous developed steady at thelimit by of the and past
applying constructed
M. I. Vishik flow
approximations incompressible
in the parameter
of two-dimensional
62
/27/. and
These smooth
by Residuals that
which
computed.
be the for
an explanation of v. considerable solution (for that the difference decrease of /28/. in x. practical In are two x
mentioned
is
the initial
of
many only
x = 0) of as
boundary-layer
we
can
assume will
increases. were
of and
solutions
Paskonov
BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. AVDUEVSKII, V.S. and E.I .OBROSKOVA. plastine s ueheromteploi mattoobmena Heat 2. and Matt Transfer). --Izv. Issledovanie laminamogo pogranichnogo sloya na porittoi (A Study of Laminar Boundary Layed of a Porous Plate with mekhaniki i ma_int_roemya, No.4. 1960.
AN SSSP,, Seziya
KARASEV, A.B. Re.shenie mavnenii pograuiehnogo sloya v l_aednei krtticheakoi tochke troinoi smesi (Solution of Boundary Layer Equatiom at the Frontal Critical Point of a Ternary Mixture). --Izv. AN SSSP_ Seriya mekhamild i mathimmxoeniya, No. 6. 1961. ANFIMOV, N.A. Laminamyi pogranichnyi _ v mnogokompoaenmoi smeSi gazov kritichefloi tochld (Laminar Boundary Layer in a Many-Component Gas Mixture Point). --Izv.AN SSSR. Sexiya mekhaniki i mathinortroeniya, No.1. 1962. v okrestnosti Near the Critical
3.
4.
ANFIMOV, N.A. Laminarnyi pogranichnyi sloi na khimicheski aktivnoi poverldmmti (Laminar Layer on Chemically Active Surface). -- Izv.AN SSSR, Se_iya mekhanitd i mashinostronniya, 1962. STULOV, V.N. Pogranichnyi slni na plastine Distoclation). s uchetom --Izv. neravnovesnoi disso_lauti (Boundary
Boundary No.3.
5.
Layer
on
i mathinostroeniya,
Teploperedacha v laminamom pogranichnom (Heat Transfer inLaminar Boundary Layer mekhaniki i maahinmtroeniya, and F.P.VASIL'EV. integro-Differential No.6.
floena plastine s uchetom khimicheskoi on a Plate with Chemical Noneqnilibrium). 1961. Solution of a Boundary-Value Boundary Layer. --
--
SSSR, Seriya
BUDAK, B.M.,
T.F.BULATSKAYA, of Nonlinear
Numerical Equations
of a Hypersonic
SOPRIJNENKO, I.P. Pogranichnyi tini na voinistoi stenke (Boundary SSSR, Seriya mekhaniki i mashinosn-oeaiya, No.2. 1962. SHKADOV, V.Ya. Ob integtirovanii uravnenii Equations). -- DAN SSSR, Vol. 126, No.4. pogranichnogo 1959. sloya
--Izv.AN
9.
(On Integration
of Boundary-Layer
10.
setok
11.
BRAILOVSKAYA,I.Yu. and L.A.CHUDOV. Reshenie uravnenii pograniehnogo sloya raznosmym metodom (Solution of Boundary-Layer Equations by Difference Methods). --ln: "Vychislitel'nye metody i [xogrammirovanie", Izdatel'stvo MGU. 1962.
63
12. 13.
GEZENKO,
I.I.
-- MGU. E.I.OBROSKOVA,
MA KUO HS0
1961. -- MGU. -- MGU. the 1961. 1961. of Boundary-Layer Problems. --This volume (see
Solution
18.
Raschet of a Liquid
zhidkogo Boundary
sloya Lateral
na
bokovoi
poverkhnosti of a Truncated
Surface
-- Otchet E.I.
19.
V.M.PASKONOV.
Raschet
sloya and
s goreniem Radiation).
i --
(Computation MGU. V.M. T.F. tela --Otchet V.M. and volume. T.S. razryvnoi and 1062. and
of a Compressible
20. 21.
Boundary sloi in
Layer
on
a Slightly
Wavy smesi
WaU. gazov on
--This na the
volume. bokovoi
v mnogokomponenmoi Gas
(Laminar VTs
a Many-Component
Mixture
Lateral
Surface
22.
PASKONOV, Point.
Yu.V.POLEZHAEV.
Unsteady
Melting
of a Viscous
Material
near
Stagnation
-- This
23.
Raschet
pogranichnogo Layer
pri
nalichii
vduva, Described by a
funktsiei
of Boundary 1962.
Inblow
24.
PASKONOV,
pogranichnyi Inblow).
sloi --Otchet
vduvom
thesis.--MGU.
-- MGU.
1961. Boundary-Layer profilei of Boundary Theory. na Layer). -- This razvitie --Otchet volume. pogtanichnogo VTs MGU. sloya 1962.
of Classical
V.M.
of Initial
64
L.A.
Chudov
SOME
SHORTCOMINGS BOUNDARY-lAYER
OF
CLASSICAL THEORY
The
classical
theory
of
the
boundary
layer
with
the to
as the viscosity flow in the entire domain. divided into flow, various from the equations. convincing It is the
boundary
assumed "main
domain
flow
viscous flow differs greatly appropriate boundary-layer A fairly rigourous flow and boundary-layer on an impermeable
described describing
of equations
of a boundary equations to
layer some
other cases of boundary layers was case of a permeable boundary, one that the normal velocity component We are thus faced with the question already in this simple Similar questions No analysis substantially wall. outlet Unlike it is As an has been different example and arise made from we can
purely formal. For example, in the of the basic premises of Prandtl -vanishes at the wall -- is not valid. of applicability very common with other layers boundary the boundary of Prandtl case*. applied equations problems.
of a rectangular channel under certain natural boundary conditions. the Prandtl boundary layer, its thickness is of the order of .v and described by ordinary differential equations. of applicability of other types gases, becomes of the classical of boundary layers, more urgent as the
The investigation of the conditions boundary-layer equations and study especially problems Very in cases of compressible done theory on the of boundary-layer little has been
conditions
boundary layer. We shall not dwell of initial conditions on the line x = x0 of boundary-layer on the "outer
layer.
65
the simplest
boundary incompressible
are near
following
y _ oo,u (x. y) --+U (x), flow at the wall. lead to a paradoxical velocity of
U (x) is the
It is well result:
layer), this physically meaningless the results (see /1/,p. 94). Some papers and text books also the introduction of a certain spurious The conditions unsound in our realized properties example, construction altogether of the are the of specifying opinion. solution conditions
behavior
consider boundary conditions based "interface" of the boundary-layer. physically cannot simple for /2/). applying (Such, in
the position of this "interface" are Some alternatives of these conditions distances of the from the wall owing boundary-layer Ou(x._)
' 0y
be
at finite
to the
u(x, 5)=U(x) approximate is hardly confined to It is easily matching equations aerodynamics, the
The
a "global"
solution,
a solution
throughout the flow domain, The description is mostly the solution for small v. impossible approximate to construct solution by of
touched in the classical a general sketch of the seen that in the general and smooth (in flow all "limiting" the and the
treatments. structure of case it is solution of the e.g., the in the /3/). of the
a continuous
components)
classical boundary-layer In some problems boundary layer Investigations construction, parameter approximations Physical differential indicate of that sufficiently
"feedback"
on the main flow is by no means of this problem are in fact mainly in the "main domain", of the next Applied problems and small as thus mainly
e=V _-
functions
and the boundary conditions e n+_ *. Known methods for the "limiting flow", and smoothness
approximate solution. The residual arising when into the Navier-Stokes equation contains singular 5-function or its derivatives This is clearly not due to an imperfection of the method It is now general may sufficiently constructed throughout object resolved smooth the flow approximations domain in the that in the
this solution is substituted terms of the type of the something inherent, but natural to ask how in in The e be main
Formally, of classical
flow approximate giving no is unable
to
solutions. indication as to
definition norms
solution
the
measuring
66
consists written smooth expansion boundary introduced boundary functions corresponding automatically In flow using the of v as this near the equations
in
that, the
in
Vishik
and
Lyusternik's solution, but the Navier-Stokes parameter flow. boundary are zero The
method, for
the
are to
terms
e with The
the
"corrections"
that
the
are away is
the
of
approximation
of
viscous
incompressible is established and of flow first constructed between behavior a simple a domain.
approximation is the is
paradoxical
y -+ _ is and and
approximate conditions "main domain". viscous be to the the for directed surface.
specifying
plane-parallel x-axis
flow the be
We conditions
write
lVa(u'v'P'O_-ug_+v_
-j
o_
_2Au=O;
(1)
Ns(u,v,p,_)_u--g_-+v
Ou
+T"
Ov
ou
(2)
Jv_(u, v) -=-_; + _
uf_-o vlv-o Following approximate The first series, using functions satisfies the relevant to part (5). functions, to . This This in Vishik solution and called functions n-th order (1), of luyusternik's problem the smooth independent approximation (2), the (3) with as = O; = O.
= o;
(3)
(4) (5) we shall series in seek terms is relations so the that the of defining smooth e"+_ . an of 5.
procedure, a sum part of of e. are a residual the of smooth inviscid does by the second on with part terms the local of x not of the two
oY the
approximation,
Recurrence chosen of
boundary condition
boundary the is
approximation remedied
condition local
i. e. , functions zero, series relations are with is for constructed any called the
to local the
and part
_1, of
as the
approximation.
part
residual,
67
obtaining when the sum of the smooth and the local parts of the approximation is substituted in equations (i),(2), (3), also has the order of zn+, 3. pressure condition iota1 and applying As the smooth for (4), this we part of the zero solution. approximation po(x,y). we take the and the a (3) corresponding "limiting" Let the velocity components
solution be Uo(x,y),vo(x,y), set in the zero approximation Inserting this (5) 0 we equation find for
function.
u in the
condition
(6)
o 0
where
_ =--.
Let
v0(x)=
_ _un --j-_ ,
0
(7)
(8)
,}
From
(6) we
have
(9)
If Inserting obtain
uo is three
a local groups
function, of terms:
then
from(8)
Vo(x,,1) is
also left-hand
a local side
function. of (1), we
Uo_-+
(Uo + Uo) _
a.o
v a.o + _l
o au
p " o--T'
+ Uo -- -- 0 --, ax Oy"
apo
(IO)
+ (% + _vo +/Vo)
(1 I)
(_o "I- _'Vo (x)) Ou-2-n _' a'u. _ _, a'u____o_2 a'_'__2o -_ . ay Ox2 Oy' Ox' Sum (10) regarded later on. vanishes as the The by the residual second definition of u0, v0, p0. The terms in (12) of the zero approximation and considered (11), is transformed by substituting
(12)
group,
+ _o(x, 0) o_
Ouo
a_,
68
where
s, =
+ a,(,. ,aj
---:--+
+
_) ,
(13)
Ox
ax
(14)
$I will be combined
with residual
approximation.
Setting So equal to.zero and combining this equation with (7), (8), and the continuity equation (3), we arrive at a system of equations of zero approximation. and set e_o = _o+ We write this system in terms of the original variable y,
_-o(*):
[.o(*,o) +u_l_-'+
+ u_ Ou,(.. O) ox
_---a_ _v (_'j = o. +
The boundary conditions are (uo + uo)w-o = O, (% + Ewo)u.o ----O, _o-+0 R is easily seen that equations as y-+ ao. conditions assume
(16)
shall moreover
a'o/,.,. = _o(,0.
where 4. _ Let is a local us function*. the zero approximation with Prandtlls This asymptotic solution boundary-layer and boundary
OUpr OfP pr ---_'y -IC I --
(20)
compare
equations. conditions:
OPo (x. " Ot es
satisfies
OauPr --
Ox
O_
= O;
(21)
* We shall assume that boundary-value this solution being a local function. following O .A .Oleinik /6/.
problem (18)-(20) has a unique solution u_in some interval xo<x<x_, With some additional restrictions, this assumption cam be proved
69
aUpr
aVpr
az
F_=
O;
Upr (X, O) = O; Vp, (X, O) = O; Up, (X, oO) = Uo(X , O) (u0(x,y), limiting We Vo(X,y), po(x,y), as before, solution of the equation introduce "increments" denote the of inviscid up,, components flow), by
ewpr defined
upr = uo(x, O) + Up,, Ova(x, O) Vp, = y_ + eWp,. Inserting the equations (15), for the uo coincide applies, equations written up, and theorem (26), (27) of in (21) and flow (22), relating and also in (23), (17), (24), obtain (25), for and
(26)
u p,, _p,
boundary of zero
conditions approximation
for x = x0. Then, if the corresponding uniqueness up, _ u_, ew p,= ew0. Comparing U.or, Vp, with the zero u(0) = u0 .4- uo, v () = v0 q- ew0, we u_) = up, -_ (uo(x, y) --uo(x find , 0)), (28)
approximation
v >= vpr + (Vo(X, y) --y It follows describe e only do not for from (28) a solution those and (29) that of the problem which of the
Ovo(x. O) _1. solution flow with , y)(up,, errors v,, )will of the y)--y
(29)
order av0fx. 0) au
y for e in order
u0(x , O) andv0(x,
exceed
We now boundlessly
auo(x, O)
c_x
_0.
The
zero
approximation
constructed
in the preceding
section
is free from
the restriction imposed on y when the asymptotic solution is used. It is noteworthy that owing to (28) and (29) the zero approximation can be constructed from tions can be made the asymptotic solution, so that the numerical computawith the aid of the various approximate methods Prandtl equations (21), (22) with boundary approximation for equation is of (I)
developed for the classical conditions (23), (24), (25). 5. We shall now show the order of e. The consists of the terms
of the zero
7O
We
write
separately
the
smooth
and
the
local are
parts
of the order
residual, relative to
and in the process isolate the terms e. The smooth part of the residual
which of order
of first e is
cA(x, y) = _ (x) _.
ay
(30)
The
smooth
part
of the
residual
of order
e2 is
O a'u0 -_-"
(31)
The
local
part
of the
residual o
of order ay
e is Oy O_o L e_ ax _(32) u o.
+T
The local part of the
. _vo P:, O)
o_
residual
of order
ez is
21
1_
._____O'mVo O)I (,
_ e"l a'u, (z, o) _ axa, ju+_P'[au'-_ Let us now with e = 0to compute construct the residual the functions smooth e. As for
'_)
O_o(z, o) o, ]"
(33)
This equation was used the smooth part of the contains residual,
(34)
which are formally of zero order not been used in the construction However, smallness it is easily to seen e: we that relative apply
in e. of the in fact
is so because equation (2) has part of the zero approximation. terms (5) and are of first them order of form rewrite in the
condition
aOo(X,) a o
[&.o(x, _)
a_.(_,o)l-
the
of equation residual
(2)
as
we have e is
done
for
equation
(1).
of order
_A: (x, y) =
71
The
smooth
part
of the
residual
of order
e2 (and
higher)
is
_ o._. 0
is
(35)
_v [ 0v(x''_) L ay
Vo(X' I -- aa O_oOx, Oy )
136)
Equation vanishes.
(3) satisfies
the
zero
approximation
exactly,
6. The zero approximation exactly. On other parts of the introduce crement faster order could than relative have an additional residual to our of e,
the boundary conditions for y = the increments u0, ev0 _- _Vo(x) boundary conditions. to zero evo(x) is of The for the ine --, 0 first we
u0, according any power to "truncated" function (1), (2) to We the In by part V=Vo-_-ev,, the to of e.
converges ev0 _
while
increment
Following the
Vishik-Lyusternik uo, of but of this e. The nevertheless the course, of first a residual is these and of dropping the first order of since the of ev_, Jr e_(x)using
increments
independent would e, shall and not change, a residual follow of follows, it first a
smooth
orders equation consistent conditions, can be The u=uo+eu,, (3), order smooth
appear approach
residual in the
of order in
e in this of the
boundary
approximation
residual
with
P=Po-}-ep,. of obtain
definitions e, we
terms
of
approximation
c)
Ouo
+ +
O;
(_v_)+ _u_-
O_o + Oy
_'_ (sP')
= o;
(37)
(_"0
+ _ (_v,)= o.
72
Wedemand that
of the smooth part approximation.
the of We
velocity
component and
vanish the
at local
y = 0 for part of
the the
sum zero
approximation
Since of the
e_0+ first
_0(x)
ffi 0for
to
(18),
then
for
the
smooth
part
approximation
boundary
condition
0.+_=_.(x)
for
y_0.
(38)
Condition approximation increment limit wall, Note main but on flow of the where
(38)
that
wheel
the
smooth equal
part to
of the
the
first
taken
zero
"at
that
boundary
a certain n of seen
from layer,
distance
boundary
a distance is
is the
in
definition @, which
conditions as far as
approximation
mBUOGRAPHY I. CHUDOV, L.A. Review of Boundary Layer Studies -- This volume. nesznimaemni zhidkosti (Dynamics of Viscous Incompressible Fluids).-Carried out at the Computational Center
of Moscow 2.
vyazkni
Moskva. Modern
3.
LEASE, L. dvizheniya
of Hypersonic deistviya".
in: "Problemy
golovnoi
IL, Moskva.
4.
VISHIK,
M.I.
and L.A.LYUSTERNIK
Regulyarnoe
vyrozhdenie
i pogtanichnyi
(Regular Degeneracy and Boundary-Layers -- U MN. Vol. 12. No. 5 ( 77 ). 1967. resheniya ktaevykh zadach
and L.A.LYUSTERNIK.
6.
differentsialnykh uravnenii (The Asymptotic Behavior of the Solution of Boundary-Value Quasflinear Differential Equations). -- DAN SSSR. Vol. 191 , No.5. 1958. OLEINIK. O.A. O tiareme uravnenii pogranichnogo sloya (On the Boundary-LayezEquations). Vychislitel'noi Matematiki i Matematicherkoi Fiziki, Vol. 3, No.3. 1963.
-- Zhurual
73
V. M.
Paskonov
OF
The
system
of
equations
describing the
the
flow
of
a viscous
compressible two
unknown be reduced
functions to the
at _-x +bt _Oh = _-y ( c ' a,9'h di + el,, aft 0 J_+ Opu + 0_, o_ _-y =o,(i=1,2 ..... k).
(1) (2)
(I)
Equation
(2)
is the
ordinary
continuity
equation
where
u and
v are,
the longitudinal and the transverse System (D contains k _ lunknowns, of the Ii should identically coincide always be brought to form (1).
velocity component, p namely v and ft (i = 1,2,... k). with u, since the equation It is assumed that the of of a
coefficients a_, b L, q, dl, e l may depend on v, fl and various combinations of their derivatives. The standard form (1) suits not only the equation motion, but also the energy equation (the equation of the temperature boundary layer), the diffusion equations for each component (equations continuity for every individual component) when we are concerned with flow of a multicomponent gas mixture in the boundary layer, and the radiative balance equation when we are concerned with radiative transfer in the boundary layer. System (I} also describes the boundary layer behavior for the oblique some approximation, conditions of zero lift. The class of problems which can be conditions For purposes is desirable flow of a compressible gas past a cylinder or, for the gliding of a wing of finite span under The flow in a wake is also described by system considerably imposed on increases system if the (D are diverse into class enable boundary consideration. of problems the entire taken
with (D.
it
system (D or at least the system (1) to be integrated for various boundary conditions, various coefficients at, b_, q, dl, e_, and various dependence of p on the unknown functions or their derivatives. This standard program was evolved at the Computational Center of the Moscow is so schemes State University for the STRELA permits the nonstationary computer. application boundary The standard program of certain difference layer problems. written that it even for the solution of
74
As is grid
in
/2/,
the
system by
(19
is
solved implicit
by
difference
method. scheme.
Equation A rectangular
(I)
approximated is chosen on
six-point
the
x = xo + nAx ,
y = mAy,
(m, n = O, l, 2 ....
),
and
an
auxiliary
net
Note of the
that
the
mesh of
spacings system
hx and (D.
Ay may
vary,
depending
on
the
behavior
solutions
The (the
coefficients
computed points).
at the
auxiliary
grid
points
"half-integral"
Setting
ax
2ay
--
av, {[0 - s,)(/,,.+, -- p,;,) + s,(p_+,- _1 _..7__r_. - t(_ s,)(/TU:_--,)s, + qT.-:7_,-,)J + _-_.}
+ d_'.7". + _ ", [(1 -- s,) _-' s l can that (3) can be be chosen written -4- sJ_'m], differently in the form for each (3)
n--I
--I
'
where equation
the
averaging _(T
parameter 1
'
-_s_<
Note
(4)
System boundary of ]_ on
(3),
together
with specifies
of the values
n, if the
(n -- l)-th layer
75
points of
known. (1) is we
is
solved on forcing
by
the
forcing layer. in
successively the
every coefficients
find [t on recursion
A_.,h%+l
+ B_,,
(5)
alrnAirn
71,n -_
_lra
(6)
Bl0 are
found
from
the
The the
program recursion
(5) at points are mesh (m-the are computed spacing l)-th and (rn-{- I)-th
forcing from
differ
(6). and
m-th is
points
the
spacing respect
points
at the coefficients
(rn--2)-th, the
m-th,
points,
are
computed
formulas
+ _irn
+ Blm-2) _- _irn
a_m, and
_,.,,,
7i_,
_,are
determined
from
(4)
with
m--2
substituted
for
2AgforAg. the mesh between (m+l)-th, size the and changes (rn--1)-th (m+2)-th approximated and the at the and points the it at the ,n-th m-th is point from points '/2hg, the is Ag to hgand derivatives using the '/2hg, i. e., when
spacing m-th,
respect m-th,
points,
coefficients
computed
from
almBlm--1)
The
ai_,, rn + m
_i_,
be
(4) _m+tare
with also
m +2 determined 1, and
substituted from
1 and
is
2 substituted
form--l,
m+2form+
*[ Cf., e.g., I.S. Berezin and N.P. Moskva. 1959, and later editions.
Zhidkov, ]
Metody
vychisleniya
( Numerical
Methods),
76
!2
Ay for
Ay.
The
program
5 regions Ay,, _
with intervals
different of length
Ayj(j = 1, 2,
!
'"
5) (or
in one
layer:
m 1 intervals m_ intervals
ay, = T
ay,
Ay, = -_
Ay, (or
Ay, = 2Ay D.
(i=l, 2.... k, m=0,1 ..... M--I; M-_l layer) on the n-th layer and face of the boundary seeing should that before f_ for layer as x solving However, thicker, we one of the
outer
(for m=Nl), we can find increases the boundary (5) for matching ft at all the condition grid
functions
the
(7)
is not satisfied on the coefficients Au_, Bm values as many of li are used as points
is
in computing
coefficients, in the
necessary to ensure smooth matching for the two last points of the layer. Addition of many points in the .-th layer generally shows that Ax is too large, f_ in condition (7) is the function with the maximum thickness of the asymptotic boundary layer. This choice of the test function should be verified The in every continuity particular equation 1 problem (2) is by numerical by n computations. the difference equation approximated I
ft, found
p are from
at all (8)
grid
points v_,-'r' to
layer re=l,
boundary enables
condition
transverse
component,
equation
n-th layer (M'_> M). (D, as indicated above, derivatives. over v and
of their interpolation
principal points. We thus have to as functions of unknown functions. usual way. In the first approximation (n--I) -th layer are assumed Systems (D of different ai, hi, cl, all, et, for fl (different conditions subroutines, subroutines, compiled subroutines 77 SP /3/: for for the particular
compute _, b_, c_, d_, ex on the n-th layer This is carried out by iteration in the the values of a function on the corresponding problems points of the n-th layer. differ in their coefficients conditions at y=0 in upper boundary using special
performed
for
which can be incorporated as a rule, perform simple every particular problem are given by referencing the
in the main program. These arithmetic operations and are anew. The core addresses of these standard program according to
77
x
+ 1 x 4- 2 + 3 ,_ + 4 x+5 Here %sa [3es a "fesa _csa <Ayl>
4004
rosa Pcsa _csa _csa <Ax_
0 j' j= /3 h 15
acsa, csa, Y csa, csa, csa, csa,arethe core starting addresses _ B v P of the following functions:
conditions);
of the subroutine
which
is referenced
after
every iteration. This subroutine can be compiled, for example, so that it would control the convergence of iterations and suitably adjust the interval Ax, etc. _csa is the core starting address a required number described before) included of a subroutine which is referenced after of iterations (this number or after a pre-determined the program. This is specified in the subroutine number N of iterations subroutine is generally used
in referencing
for controlling the computations, for finding the unknown functions from the solution obtained on the n-th layer, for modifying the intervals Ax and Ay, printing out results, etc. The initial data fed into the computer include the number of equations (1), k; the number of the equation for which condition (7) should be checked, i'; the core address of the word where the e of condition (7) is stored, < e >; the core addresses of the words number layer, where Ay,and Axare stored, < Ay, >, < Ax >; of the maximum Ayjintervals k>l, k,l= permissible in the initial 1,2 ..... 5). j, = 1, if Ay is constant; O, otherwise. then M lmJ. of points in a layer, Mm_,; the number rn I (]=l, 2 ..... 5; rn, = 0, if rnt = 0 and
iv =
O, if
1, if
Ayq
1 Ayq=2Ayq_ t.
= -7 Ayq_
I.
(q=2,
3, 4, 5)
The
standard
1146
words
of
memory.
When
using
space (n--l)-th
be allocated to the working program (kMm_+14 words), to the n-th layer where lis the When SSP-2 /3/ is memory. of type where (1);
(2k(Mm_+l)+k+l words), number of intervals with used the program The standard can be program
to the storage of s_ (klwords, different Ayi in the layer). loaded anywhere can also be used of bypassing the
is provided is integrated.
78
BRAILOVSKAYA. I. Yu. and L.A. CHUDOV. Reshenie uravnenii metodami (Solution of BounCiary-l_ye; Equatiom by Difference
3.
metody i l_ogxammizovanie'. Izdatel'stvo MGU. 1962. ZHOGOLEV, E.A. Sistema programmizovaniya $ i_pol' zovaniem biblioteki podprogramm (Programming w_th a Subtour2ne Library). --In: _Sistema avtomarizatsti programm_ovaniya," lq. P. T_IFONOV an_ II.R.SHURA-BURA, Editors. Fizmatgiz0 Moskva. ]961.
79
V. M. Paskonov
and
I. P. Soprunenko
BOUNDARY
LAYER
ON
SLIGHTLY
WAVY
WALL
In necessary
formulating to make
problems allowance
of
flow of
it the
is
sometimes surface.
contact
Even slight waviness will produce periodic fluctuation of pressure. This has a considerable effect on boundary-layer flow, may lead to separation of the boundary layer, and to onset of turbulence. A solution of profile the problem
2_x
of is
flow (x,
on
a wavy
wall
with
y=a0sin
y define
Cartesian wave
with x-axis parallel to the a0 to be small in comparison for the downstream velocity can be written
incident flow). Assuming the with the wavelength L, the component of the incompressible
2-V
(1)
and
the
expression
for
the
pressure
on
the
-2--'
and
velocity
The problem of boundary-layer flow on in /2/ assuming linearity in a and expanding of x; the expansion coefficients were taken variable _ = Y _= T is the kinematic
a slightly wavy wall was solved the stream function in powers as functions of the characteristic viscosity, I_ viscosity, a, the boundary each wave there occurs, while The value oecurred
X
on the amplitude etc., ridge. For aI1 a<a. no separation separate to 0.011, at this ridge. and separation with the separation separation
of at
for
the
second
at T=l.6. of a laminar
foIlowing
criterion
8O
at the outer face of the {2), and boundary-layer , occur 0,0011 we at find a,= that according
the 13)
Assuming plate
(?)
should and
0.0032 point
at the
X
of the ridge,
at the
-_-= 1.515
of the
second
by the
carried out with the purpose of establishing, the values of a, at which separation occurs All gas the calculations were made with the of boundary-layer equations 4k_ flow m _,,= boundary layer and the In the [4[. on a wavy The problem
at
standard program for solution Consider incompressible with the pressure reduces x-axis directed distribution to the following u-Ou ox
wal!
of equations: Y_ _ o___ + Ox o_ =o. ay vector along the x and y boundary conditions at u is taken velocity at y=0: flow (2_)Sacos 2_x --+v-_ Oeu o_, ' (4)
u and v are the components of the velocity System (4) should be integrated with zero (u=O. v=O), while at the upper face of the to the longitudinal component u==V., of the potential
boundary-layer
+ V. 2xarfin 2_ quantities
Introducing
the
dimensionless x
x'=
_-"
Y"
u r"R_-
"
u'
=_-:-_'
v C_i"
v.
P" =
_-_-2 '
( Re = P_-_ ) "
and
omitting
the
primes,
we
obtain
the
system
of
equations
c_u
(6)
at the
upper
To determine the {5), (6)was integrated profile, we assumed solution for a plane
values of a, at the first, second, etc., for various values of a. As the initial the values of u and v for x= 0.01 from plate.
81
An iterations was
of
the
effect
of with The
Ax, of on
of
the
number is profile hx= determined was 0.01 x= increase from We layer therefore and us{ng
of
made
a= first
21,
Ay = 0.04. and and in the 6 iterations. x= 0.54. number clearly another profile again = 0.005 of
calculations of separation the was choice Ax= 0.01, the but 0.005 same 0.001. 0.005, but results further was
between sharp
0.53
When of points
approaching in of a layer a poor with with Ax= 0.46 close, for with with The new The Ax= the Ax=
to
of_iterations _= increased. x= 0.41, 0.480 we was the preceding < Xsep< 0.480. and made 0.01 and The
6. were separation
Up
to fairly
x--
= 0.485.
velocity point of
followed again:
0.479
I 1/
f ">_-_
,.0.,6
II//_
_
I f I z
1. Velocity
_,o.9
/jj
0
- ,.,,zs J
3
profiles u for a
I _
= 0.008
I s_
FIGURE
of separation iterations
was i.e.,
x=
0.416 found
and that
in the from
the
away
near convergence
the
iterations, x= 0.416
points six
y= iterations
0.08
then compared
5u t <e= twelve at
0.0003 x=
needed
0.476.
.0
I 1
FIGURE
2
2. Velocity
3
profiles u for
4,
a = 0.003
82
On the
strength
of
these
results,
in further
calculations
with
Ax if the number of iterations 6u_ <e The taken This with y-intervals
of points in a layer more had to be increased to more condition were Aye= 0.04, (with made the e = 0.0003) variable: other points to the less
at points on the
y were
Ay_ = 0.08. Initial x-interval was Ax = 0.01. As we approached separation point, we gradually reduced _ until it decreased 0.001. The separation was thus pinpointed to within 0.001. Alternative 0.005, which claculations were made for a= 0.01, 0.008,
0.0065,
0.003, 0.002, 0.001. The results show that the amplitude a, for separation fL-st occurs at the first ridge !ies in the interval 0.006 <
<a,< 0.0065 , and at the second ridge, in the interval 0.002 < a,< 0.003. The separation point for various amplitudes a varies as follows:
I Xsep I
om 0.4775
! ]
o.oo8 0.5125
I 0.003 1.54
first ridge For velocity amplitudes profiles a at which u flatten out separation toward the Figure occurs separation the
second ridge at the first point as velocity ridge, the x increases. u for and at second Figure layer 3 8 graphs
1 shows
profiles
a = 0.008 (separation at first ridge), Figure 2, for a = 0.003 (separation ridge). gives G
FIGURE 3.
the
For the same alternatives thickness of the boundary x, as determined (see /4/). We from see
d_
Variation
t.e
of boundary-
t5 X
boundarytoward the is
separation point; in the second case, there only a slight increase in thickness. We should also observe that for the occurred at the first to the profiles of the profiles coincide of iterations was found up to ridge, classical x= 0.76. layer. The A somewhat the Blasius
a at which no separation profiles u were very close For a= 0.001, of we noted iterations the the two
In calculations average number higher number of new alternative. satisfy our system
in each to be 2--4.
iterations (5--7) was observed at the This is due to the fact that the initial of difference equations and the first
computational procedure was in fact devoted to establishing a solution adequate accuracy. As we have already observed, the number of iterations sharply increased near the separation point. It is remarkable that first although ridge, interval for a = 0.005 and a = 0.006 no separation occurred at the the number of iterations increased (to 6--9) for 0.58 <x< boundary-layer separation occurred at a = 0.0065.
0.7.
In this
83
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
LOITS'YANSKII, Moskva.
Mekhanika
zhidkosti
i gaza
(Liquid
and
Gas
Mechanics).
--
Gostekhteoretizdat,
2.
SOPRUNENKO, AN SSSR,
sloi
na
volnistoi
stenke No.2.
Layer
on
Wavy
Wall).
--Izvestiya
3.
BAM-ZELIKOVICH, --Izvestiya
of Boundary-Layer
Separation).
AN SSSR, V.M.
nauk, Solution
No.
4.
PASKONOV,
A Standard
Program
of Boundary-Layer
Problems.
--This
volume.
84
V.
nd
Yu.
V. Polezhaev
resp_ecti_vely)_
Exact solutions a_e motion of the molten film i_ot layer. The equations for the gaseous can therefore be solved separately. problem, and the well-known The present of the process The thickness molten equations equations The the flow we can assume formulas for paper describes that the a gaseous an
attempt
a laminar boundary layer. of the melt is practically therefore be regarded assumed weaker as are also substantially of equations coordinate a
of the
(in the
in Figure
-_y(_)= o,
1
(_)
_ [ _,, \
_-+_-_+_-_= or +,
_. Here along x, y are x, y axes; Cartesian r p tbe the
_u
8u
#u
p
ay
ap __ I
0_
-;-"_fk_-_y) _r
_ " u, v the symmetry _ the
'
(2) (3)
0r + v__ =__L__
8x pc r , time; axis density; of
velocity of the
temperature;
viscosity;
conductivity; c a is the specific heat We now make certain simplifying 1. If we confine ourselves to the critical velocity point of a bluff body, we a linear
at constant pressure. assumption. motion of the molten film near aT may take r=x,-_x =0. and consider function 85 of x.
the the
component
u to be
Provisional of higher
estimate order of
show smallness
that
and
time
terms in the
terms
Seeing a= const,
that we
critical the
velocity
equations
ESg!ii?: Et;
Gaseous boundary la2/er Solid body
The
problem
is thus
reduced
to a system v and T:
in two
independent
variables
unknown
functions
o-7+
-- \dx
= 0,
(4)
OT
_T
__O 0T =0,
(5)
friction of the
at
the gaseous of
film
surface, boundary
which layer.
is
assumed
to
be
do
not in
solve setting T =
liquid
the
solid
in
the
for
y=O for
+q_(T_)=O, T(_)=Tcs
(6)
The gaseous nor occur simple Riddle solved /3/ The scheme The
heat
flux boundary
to
the
film, layer.
q_, If with we
should
be
known
of
the
additionally components the the with for heat well-known boundary the Center by
reactions surface of
the film,
the
transfer
e. g., (4),
from (5)
conditions
solution of
problems University.
a standard difference
rectangular equations
the by the
y=mAy.
86
1 - 2 seconds after the onset of heating, since even at 2000K is still very high (of the order solutions of the problem of unsteady heating the rate of variation of surface
determine
temperature
the depth of heating in the first 1 - 2 seconds before the formation of the liquid film. Physical considerations show that these rates at least should not increase after the molten film has formed. On the other hand, certain limitations the heat on 12ux the time the interval _tu_face are imposed by T,. the nonlinear When variation of the the q, with temperature approximating
boundary conditions for the n-th time layer we were forced to employ values of q_ (Tf)calculated on the (n-1}-th layer, and therefore the difference q_ ( T(_) ) -- q_(T_ -')) had to be sufficiently small. For these reasons we took AT equal to 0.02 sec and Ay = 1.10-4m. The process of unsteady heating increases the region of other words, the number of points on the n-th layer should or equal to the number of points on the (a-1)-th layer. A provision integration value at larger automatically from infinity the is made in the program for the definition fhe condition of smooth (since the temperature dynamic determined layer). by the The inequality matching boundary number integration, be greater domain with much is
in than of its
of the
than
of points
layer
--[
e was set equal to 1. In some alternatives this did not affect the flow of the film. results of of test to runs set in showed may be that as the high melting all of
required 15--20
unsteady-state variation of the object hv, Ay and It was might values. lead
curve leading to the steady parameters past the midpoint reducing machine time, we
gentle, and is slight. With for 128. the doubling size velocity for and at the
e when found,
the number of points on a layer however, that with this program weakly hand, damped we could the fluctuations set up an The highest
mesh
reducing temperature
behavior gradients
near _ =0, It is therefore advisable to use This we did, and together with overall reduction layer substantially improved the approximation since A!/was reduced was defined as follows, 4 intervals of 2.10-sin, and all other intervals, up matching, distribution alternatives of the with
of high gradients, T_e 9"mesh 1 10-Smeach, of 8.10 -_ m, condition This previously resolution alternatives
by an order of magnitude. starting with y_-0: 6 intervals of 4 intervals of 4.10"sin, 4 intervals to the boundary basis defined by the of a
equal to 1.6.10-4m. was chosen on the with the object flow of the liquid the new y-mesh
of an analysis as fine
of ensuring
87
Comparison f results showed o onthe wholea good agreement the of ablationrate in bothcases,butthe steadysurfacetemperature andthe velocityprofiles in the initial periodsomewhat differed. Sinceallowance nonlinearityof the systemin the standard for program makesit necessary carry out iterations in everytime section,wehad to to determine number iterationsensuring the of desiredaccuracy. An analysisof theresults showed thatthe convergenceepends n d o variousparameters theproblem: rate of heating,propertiesof the of material, giventime instant,etc. However,as a rule, satisfactoryresults couldbeobtained thethird stepalready, andthe conclusive at runof the problemthereforeemployed threeiterations. Weseefrom the summary tableof thealternativecalculations thatin the first five alternativesonlytheparameters the incidentflow were of changed,Theheatflux andthe friction atthe film surface,andalsothe second derivativeof pressureandthe enthalpy gradientin the boundary layerweredetermined from the followingrelations /5/:
07
= --
i.o_lw
i", rg,
pz(t3),;
_ the velocity gradient near b are functions of the incident 106 . velocity gradient at the 10_; heat flux from gas. In particular,
properties b= only
a=--4013, Individual critical This 400 alternatives point corresponded kcal/m 2 sec to _---(I-V) differed varied
[d._, \-_-]=
in our 700
which
in the
4,104-_1.2 of the
VI we dependence
constants we
for
the
viscosity
EEl
8.5 [
_"-v
thermal
*' 1_1_4/i
d
FIGURE
I
6
of ablative
_
2. Rate in
8
mass
t
loss
increase of the heat transfer coefficient (a/q,)g in alternatives I-V produces a sharp increase in the rate of approach to the steady state. heat fluxes, the In the limit, steadying with time very should large be
vs. time
various
alternatives
88
Decrease of viscosity (alternative VD and decrease of the material (alternative VII) produce a similarly It is noteworthy of the incident Heat conductivity condition, that the thermal diffusivity VH were steadying via a =as in trend thermal pep not and
of
only
a boundary
indirectly
WI/
//l/I li'I/
III/A II!/I
IIII
,, mlllI I11 II I II I
FIGURE 3. Surface temperature of liquid film vs. time in various alternatives
film
the variation of the surface of time in various alternatives. state I - V). properties value is similar of the of temperature
of the molten general trend of curve steadying of about of the the that which considerable values, heat conductivity rate is of
temperature the ablation However, process and pronounced. 35 (alternative film surface at which the inaccuracies notoriously deviations Much on
toward the steady rate (alternatives the on effect the of the stationary
more
of viscosity stationary
determination
difficult to measure accurately, of the calculated results from weaker, though still marked,
surface temperature. Figures 4 and 5 give dimensionless at three successive times, calculated
89
and
the
of was
V.
We grids:
have one
remarked mesh
variable
y-interval.
v]v
I
IIII
Alternative t, 1.5 sec t : 3.1 sec t _6.1 seo V*
0.#
_6
B._
I
0 FIGURE 4. / 2 3 _' S
Itti
IIII
5 7 $ j.lO for three Comparison time instants of dimensionle_ profiles of ablation rate and different Ay (alternatives V and V*)
and
5 illustrate by
the change
changes of mesh size suffices liquid the gave a the constant Figures of
in
temperature It should alternative say layer that was gradient of rate and 3). the and even
and be V
velocity observed made a poor the by allowed rate. surface V* with 3 -4 that
produced and for film This the flowed clearly and the in mesh fairly liquid freely,
size. Ay in to
when
represented to the be
did general
accurately
ablation
alternative
_Alternative
05 0 FIGURE 5. interior Io Comparison ZO of dimensionless time instants V and V*) $0 temperature and different _ profiles j.aO for the
of the body
for three
Ag {.alternatives
Of the the
considerable of the
the
in
Figure flow
6. parameters
It
shows on
temperature
V* rate and
shows of the
heat a With
coefficient
(a/Cp)g, influence
which on
transfer
9O
the
is the
heated external
to
considerable namely
the and
film surface
thin
forces,
small), layers.
is transconductivity
substantially
depth.
I '
%_
as!
zaar _s.
,,,
\_
m
FIGURE 6.
"..-_,.,._.. _ 20
......_...__., JD
....... #'#__
The effect oi material properties and incident flow parameters on the unsteady temperature profile is a comparison stationary by the of curves V* and VL It is known profile is
interest
temperature
w_
Ir--_ Tw -- To
a=
appear
that case,
unsteady V* of
in Figure a=
alternatives,
surface
_ and nearly pep temperature This this simple clearly for 6 is to these purely reach and loss by
validity
methods
curves
and VI0
in Figure required
results
obtained
the time
equilibrium between the processes transfer of heat by the liquid phase more, This can have a decisive
of heating, heat conduction, and may in some cases be 10 seconds influence in calculating the mass
viscous glassy materials in gas streams, whose parameters vary with time (in particular, in the case of an atmospheric entry trajectory). The accuracy provided for these problems by the quasistationary equations of heat conduction and liquid-film motion will apparently be very low. It is noteworthy that the time required to reach steady surface temperature is much lower than that corresponding to the ablation rate.
91
cO e4
oO
>,l_
I=
_
il
c_
1466
92
This shows thatthe flow of the liquidfilm substantially odifiesthe m rate of heatredistributionin the body. In conclusion weshouldobserve that in so far asthe dataonthe physicochemical propertiesof materialsare widelyscatteredin the literature, noreliable computations canbe made theprocesses of of heatingandablationfollowedby a comparison theresultswith adequate of
experimental data.
BIBLIO_.A PI"IY I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. SCALA and SUTTON. The Two-Phase -- Heat Transfez and Fluid Mechanics FAY and PIDDLE. Theoretical [Rumian iron.clarion. 19_9.] Analyr_ Hypenonic Lamina_ Institute. 1958. of Heat Transfe_ Boundary Layer --A SmdyofSurfaceMelting. Point AMated by DL_ociated Air.
at the Frontal
for the Solution of Boundary-Layer Problems. -- This volume. ( Theory of Heat Conduction). -- GITTL, Moskva. 1952. Trar_fer near
SIBULKIN, M..Teploperedacha vblizi perednei kriticheskoi techki tela vrashcheniya (Heat the Frontal Critical Point of a Body of Revolution). -- In: "Mekhanika," No. 3, 1943. BETHE, H.A. and ADAMS, M.C. A Theory for the Ablation of Glag_ Materi_l. --Journal Space Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 6. 1959,
of the Aero
93
T.S.
Varzhanskaya,
E.I.
Obroskova,
and
E.
N.
Starova
BOUNDARY
LAYER
NEAR
THE
CRITICAL
POINT
I. layer light
paper
presents point
an on
analysis a porous
laminar
boundary A The
a critical -- hydrogen
in a stream wall
of air.
-- permeates with an
rate.
equations
for
diffusion
in dimensionless
pu
0_- + pv _-y
= o _-y a
+ x,
o #x
(ou) + ac
(po) = O, / D ac \ i (i)
p. _
+ _o oy
ov _P " -_7}P4-
--
dc
de
the
external
flow
velocity
near
the
critical
point
is low
(M
_0),
we
energy boundary
for
y=O,
u=O, Dl_
4
c=c_, Oc
@ t
O= 1
I, (2)
Oy
The are
for
o at the
wall
is derived
in /I/.
The
notations critical
x. y the x-axis to
Cartesian
point,
with
directed the
it; u,v
horizontal absolute
velocity
where
T is the (ratio of
temperature; density
concentration of the
hydrogen mixture);
the
hydrogen
density
p density;
conductivity;
94
values
at the
physical to vary
X=
(1 -- 0.50) '.s.
p=
(1 --o.s0) 0 + ]3._
1.2
1.2--0.s0
(1--
0"50)"_
l+0A31--cc
o.o
l+3"gSl----c
,)
c ",
(31
' = 13.15(I--0.50)0-,_, Pr, /2/ = 0.73. for the case near wall} _-_ the can =0.5. critical be reduced point by
Prt,_ = 0.151, These 2. in the The case relations system are taken over from
of partial
equations at the
w
{constant
x = x, Y = /4/ function
[gdy, V = pv _u dr" _). dx x = x, _ = Y, $ = xf, where such that 0__ = u, _ aY 0_ in c(n/. 8(_}
[' = u
x '
a dimensionless nonlinear
= --V, and
to [_11:
differential
equations
]
P Cp/0' = 0,
(4)
with
the
boundary
conditions
]=0:
_'=0, _=oo:
O=
|. C:C,_, f'=l.
f= 0=0, iterative
|P_Dn_.,l_cw P)g,o " C. c=O. procedure: L 8. c: f0{q). c01q} in new linear c {_ the 00(q), c0(q_. 00(_). coefficients we
(5}
We
solved 1.
system
(4)
by
the
following
Choose
a zero
approximation approximation
for
functions
2. of the find
[0(_},
equation,
95
Substituting second Substituting equation, with 02(_), c_(_), the etc. equation,
the c,
functions we find
in the
coefficients
the for
functions I'(_). to is
the
coefficients the entire approximation difference all q) becomes arising of described, equation the
of
approximation The process (for linear the dwell in forcing of on the the form
find
continued function
equations
rewrite
Pf" + QF where
-- Kf' + L = O,
p=_p,
are unknown For condition functions have of T].
Q=(_p),+f,
/<= f,,
L = !
8
,I = 0 we V =
to satisfy
the
boundary
The the
l at infinity problem
to the
e=
10-a, At
interval .... _
parts. is
the
= kh ..... relations
approximated
following
finite-difference
p_
--K,
l_+,-t#-, 2h 3f._1
+L
k = 0 for
_=
2 3 .... nw2,
(6)
P.-i
-_-
1. --
+ 3t._,
--
l.-_ l
+ I
+ 61._,
--
.--2f._,
+,__=--
' 12
at the The
point
_h-,
= (n--
boundary
conditions
0, I
Pr&.
v l=
l:
/.-,--41.-, 2h
+3[.=
I.
96
From
(6) we
find
that
the
coefficients
A,,
B,,
C, in the
forcing
equation
(8)
satisfy the following recursion formulas
where
a,----_ (
,,=
P* _-K, h') 2h
7,=Q_%-_,-P'
From Bl. C,
these
formulas
we
can with
compute
all
the
forcing The
using the
boundary
A, ffio. B.=o,
A,
c.=h,.
C.
=T' !
B. = 0
=T 3 I'"
conditions, and also the by the of the
Applying forcing reverse convergence functions equation for various 0.8; 0.9. For and for c.
(7) and
the
right-hand
boundary
relations forcing,
n -- 2. n -- 3, n -- 4, we find f. and f.__. Then we find f.-2, 1,,-3 ..... fl. To improve the having calculated f_, _, _. ) in the tried we substitute
_ _+_ 2 approximation.
several 0.2;
c. = 0; linear
approximation
for
function for ff(_)(except Pr&. /all 11> 0 a11, etc. a11q, _ = + (l--q} served the the solution solution
c. = 0.4, as the zero approximation with c.= 0.2, and for q=0,c=c. c. = 0.6, as the zero approximation with c.= 0.4, zero and = 0.6 with,1 was
> 0 served
c. = 0. the
_o = 0 for
as _=f(,]) we tried
97
of
the
results
at corresponding
points
'I shows
that
h = 0.15
coarse (this shortcoming size h = 0.075 gives much ,1 the results computations of obtained for
is particularly more satisfactory with high 'I for h = 0.075 concentrations various
near the wall). while for differ made is only with shown at these
c, 0, f, f' with
c.
on
the
I - 4. We Figure
c,0.['reach
x
4 gives
__u= f,, We
in the layer
is less than the velocity at exterior points. For all cw > 0,f'reaches a maximum in the layer, i.e., in the layer the velocity is higher than the velocity at exterior points. As the hydrogen concentration at the wall increases, f' rises considerably and [" at the wall also increases,
o9
o,,
o,_
FIGURE 1. Concentration cofthe inblown gas (hydrogen)vs. T for I various e values at the wall
3. method The
(1),
(2) was
solved
by
an
alternative
method
difference scheme described in for x0 = 0.01. Twenty-six points for 0-.<y_ 2.8, equal to 0.0025.
chosen in the 2.8 < y _< 7.2. 6 layers were with 6 iterations As the number. concentration asymptotic c, -- 0.2 were profiles
Ay= 0.4 for The first other see layers /5/). in for the with effect of the the
with 8 iterations per layer and s --0.7 (s is the averaging expanded, of smooth the velocity is STRELA solution. the
the points on layers increased matching (see /5/) was checked component slowest. computer u. Several to determine In our case,
of-_the
alternatives the
initial
final
98
I) Inthe first
previous solution
the
initial in the
data
were
borrowed variable
from _.
the
self-similar
1B
,IB
"q
FIGURE 2. The temperature functions T-- T., 0 =--vs. 11for various c values at the wall T,--T,
were self-similar,
made
on the the
0.01
_z
0.0475
interval.
Since by difference
the
values
of e, cand
u obtained
method for different z should coincide when passing to the similarity variable _l(z,y). The results showed that the solution steadied already at x -- 0.0375. After reducing the results to the self-similar variable on the interval 0.0375 was 0,1% for-,, 2) were _z _ 0.0475, 0.7% for c, the and scatter 2% for of the e. functions for identical
In the second alternative, the same as in alternative 7.2. Computations were (i. e. ,the _ 0.0475. variable, 0.1%in of e did In the u, not
the functions e, c and v in the initial layer 1, while u = y for 0 _ y _ l and ,, = I for made for 0.01 _ s_ 0.095. The solution for to the self1 did not in the c, u, v from 4.4 <y_ 7.2. data
effect of the initial data disappeared entirely) For x _ 0.0475, after reducing the results the departure from the solution of alternative 1% in exceed c, and 4%in 1.3 90). the and for initial @(for data 0.1_@_ were 0-_y_4.4, The l, the the
scatter
third
alternative, solution,
self-similar
made
effect
slowly than in alternative 2; the solution reducing the results to the self-similar 1 did from 4% in data 2, were c=0.2--Y---
steadied variable
x _ 0.085, the departure from alternative 0.73 % in c, and 1.2 % in e. The departure did not exceed 0.3% in u, 0.9% in c, and in e did not exceed 1.2 %). 4) as In the first alternative 3, u as the initial
not exceed 0.3 % in u, the solution of alternative O(for 0.1_0_ 1 the scatter chosen 14 for as follows: 0 was and value 1.
in alternative
in alternative
0_y_2.8,
c = 0for 2.8 < y _7.2; v was taken at the wall and assuming at y = 7.2
satisfying value as
99
was much
made
for
0.01 rapidly
_<x
_< 0.075.
The
effect 3.
of the The
more
than the
results
0.0525,
departure 1% in 6,
0.85 % not
in c, and exceed
of alternative from %
2 did the
0.390
in u,
departure 0.05%
solution
of alternative
exceed
in u,
in c 0.97
in 6.
38
T.0
i
t.0 0.5
o
] vs.71 at the wall for various FIGURE 4.
_
The
$
velocity u z
3
'=]' vs.
q
rl for
$
various
r_
c
FIGURE
3.
Function c values
values
at the wall
To half
the
of Ay
the ,
we
re-ran
x = 0.0475. 0.0475 -._ x-K ,1 did the scatter of 0.1-_0-K 3 did 2.3%). 0.8% in u, not not
results
0.9%
of
departure in c,
alternative 1 at
0.97% the
and of not
most 1.05
solution 4 did
c, of _0_<1,
0(for0.1_0\<l,
departure
most results
1.45%). obtained size the x. not exceed of when h,_=0.075 6. The in 6, solving and c, u from scatter 0.9% in of the problem in with of for 1.7% in u. the the self-
,_ with by the of
mesh
functions c, and
100
BIBLZOGRAPHY
" "
1.
E.I.
OBROSKOVA.
floya on
na
-- i mRssoobmena andR.BIRD.
a Porous No. 4.
M_sTmmfe.r).--Izv. C.CURT1SS,
2.
HIRSHFIELDER, 1961.]
[Runi_n
translation.
3.
A.A. 1942. H.
P_ogranichnyi
sloi
v szhimaemom
gaze
(Boundary
Layer
in
Compressible
Gas).
4. ft.
[Russian
_anslation. uravnenii
19fi6.] pogranichnogo --In: Izdatel' sloy& zazncsmym mewdy 1962. Moctkva. metod i
I. u.
Equations tabor
by the
Method). MGLI.
ychislitel' Metody
tsenLra
7-HIDKOV.
( Numerical
Methods).
-- Fizmatgiz,
101
B. M. Budak, NUMERICAL
T.F.
Bulatskaya,
and F. P. Vasil'
ev PROBLEM
SOLUTION OF A BOUNDARY-VALUE FOR THE SYSTEM OF NONLINEAR INTEGR O-DIFFERENTIA L EQUATIONS A HYPERSONIC BOUNDAR Y LAYER
OF
1.
STATEMENT
OF
PROBLEM a slender body of have the following form the leading edge along along the normal /1/:
ou
The equations of a hypersonic boundary layer on revolution in a flow of viscous heat-conductLng gas in the coordinates xL, yL, where x is reckoned from the generatrix, and y from the surface of the body pr(u T_ _b au ou _ =_r oy / _x ax
_- _r_
a(pru) __
I a (_ -7" W (
o (r _
o,
ax ax
0,+ v, :#)+ _
Oi \ oy ] '
a(prv) --0,
( 1)
ay
where uu, vu.o are the velocity components along the x and y axes, respectively, iu_ the enthalpy, p_.u_ the pressure, _= density of matter, _. viscosity, L the length of the body, rL the distance to the axis of the body, R= u._p_.Lthe Reynolds number, a the Prandtl number.
The subscript ,oo. designates the parameters of the incident flow. For a slender body, r = rw(x) y,where r = rw(x) is the equation of the generatrix. In the Dorodnitsyn variables the system (1) takes the form ]1[
au 0i
+v,-g-= Ou
0i u
p ap _ 1
ap
_]_2
M, Ms
R "-&- (yf__) o
0 z.Ol \
u-_-+v,-_-=
T_-
+ 2 _-_-[rt-_-)+
MS
/
i
(2)
_-=o,
102
where u y=
X'
_ _
,I + I=
_(_+_ _
pM i '
(3)
and
M is Equations
the
Maeh
number. be solved for the boundary _-_- =0 _-.+oo. (2), (4) is sought in the conditions for _=0.
(4)
form
The
solution
of the
boundary-value
problem
u = _ (_),
i = i(_),where_
-R"_ 2M FT
(5)
Inserting system
problem
for a
of nonlinear
integro-differential
equations:
-1,-
where
,],,
+ (,,,=o.J
(6)
(7)
F(i)=-_i.
rf"=r',
I +kl(O.
;) = ._F(Od_.
o
(8)
_(_) =_ _(t)dt,
&
(9)
x is
the
ratio
of specific
both
given functions of i. A self-similar solution of (5) exists if k const and root of the cubic
m = const,
where
is a nonnegative
(11)
103
where S(+o G=3_' a is the of bodies parameter admitting I+ M -,: .,_-Rgeneratrix of the (12) family
(65, (75 for the integro-differential with the cubic (115, where function i (_). The
the
convergence
2.
GENERAL METHOD
OF OF the
THE
NUMERICAL
the
problem to /1 /
differenc
-2-u= _' (_) = _" (_) and decrease advisable increase it by points and replace derivatives, the values difference explicit integrals formula will be The not slower to employ of _. Taking than e-H:; a varying where mesh,
i (_) for
_ _ -hc_ constant, increasing 0 _< _ _< l, we it is with divide _v], v = 1,2 ...... n and its by corresponding The The
a sufficiently
0 = S0 < _i < ... < _. = l into at each point _v the value which of the ratios are provisionally discreteapproximating yv and yv calculated ratios will not
n unequal segments [_-,, of the unknown function designated y(_ function y_ and the from the values of yr. will be given be calculated advantageous). method. (11) in the infinite
form of these difference of the unknown functions (Simpson's numerically boundary-value formula solved by problem replaced 0 _< _ _< l: (Y[)v _ by is
more
interval problem on
boundary-value
(13a)
@0=0, _.=
i 0=i_, 1,
or i.=O,
i0=0,
1. (1) ks + k 2 -- G2 = O,
K
104
where{YtN,(Y_)v,
substituted for the
_,
Ira(/) denote
the
corresponding
quadrature
formulas
integrals
0'f) _-_,
The that the points interval length of the the 0_/and ! of the unknown entire the
(r t
mesh spacing along the axis are chosen finer mesh that so
interval functions we
interval;
of _, and /v as v appro_-ches _ be analogous to i (_)as _ -_ +vo (see the beginning of this section, ! 1/ F(i) =--=-- i i,
we
solve
the
difference
boundary-value
problem
(13a)-(13e)
by the
following
iterative
scheme:
(=) (s+lj (s) (s) (s-+-l) 2n1 _'--1 (?
(_,
(=)
(,+,) 7,,+,,
(s+t)
+
all
,_,
,,+,)
+
(15b) (15c) (15d) (15e)
%=1, (or
(s) (=)' (s)
for iQ=0),
(z)
s=0,1,2
....
_=i.
i.=0
(z)
|=)
_,, can
(concerning
(o) (0_
its
see
to
find for
then
(15e),
Now
in the in terms
equation known
(15a),
is
(o)
are
quantities (15c)
tl)
_v,
iv, for
k s=l,
(l)
equation the
for
$, with
(t)
with numerical
boundary differentiation
eonditions
(I)
_to=O, _ by
_#=I.
(l),
we find with
_tthe
and
The is
coefficients linear
(I), {1)
of the s=0
difference in terms of
in
(0)
(_,
(o)
are k and
quantities
(I)
_1_, _h(15d)
_, for
i,,
equation
,_2)
is solved
(D (_l
s=l. find
{3) ($)
analogously
the
(2)
next
approximation
)#_, i_, k,
and then
approximation
_1_, i-,
k, etc.
105
The
iteration
is terminated
(Sq-l) (s)
at s=so,
when
s+l) (s)
the
inequalities
are first satisfied for all v=0, which has been taken equal to
1.2 ..... 10 -5 .
n; here
e is a given
positive
number,
3.
DESCRIPTION AND OF
OF THE
APPROXIMATIONS OF THE
difference approximation (13a) -(13e) for (6), (7), (11} The interval 0 _ _ _ lis divided into r subintervals and each smaller
is constructed by points
0=10 < 1_ < ... < 1,-_ < 1, =l, in turn divided into several length h_ so that
i__,
i=
1,2 .....
r.
(17)
rl_=n
_-
12--ll h2
'
...
....
rt r=
n l ''b
...
"+
nr-,
-_
It--l,-1 hr
= n
(18)
are
integers. Evidently,
i
l_=2(n_--nj__)h
i,
no=O,
i:
1.2 .....
r.
(19)
We
have
thus
divided
the
segment
a nonuniform
_, .... _,, =l where _ =l_, i=l, 2, ..., r, such that when passing from the interval l__, <4 </_to
=2h_.
denote
any
of the the
functions derivatives
in equations g'(_)and
(6) by y"(_v)are
g(_)and replaced
g. for0<_<n,;
Yv+l
-2hi
Yv--I
<n_,
i =0, 1.....
r, (20)
for
_=n
r i=
1,2 .....
r--l,
106
y"(_) = y_ =
i. i=0,1
.....
r,. (21)
i=
1,2 .....
r--1.
or
(22)
are
respectively
replaced
or
f(O)_.--Ys4"4yt_SY
YI,
Y.=Y,.
(24)
the
trapezoid
formula
by
cv
Y_,-, + Yn,
...
+h_ for
"'"
The
derivative
at the
right
end
point
(26)
at the given
left
end
point
is
formula
functions
of boundary-value problem (6).(7), (Ii) are sufficiently smooth, then with this method of approximation of the derivatives and the integrals, taking I sufficiently approximation mesh chosen. on large, accurate the to difference O (h2). scheme where (13a)(13e) maximum gives spacing an of the h is the
2 . Solution for a linear difference equation by the variable mesh. In the course of iteration (15a)-(15e)0 a boundary-value problem for the linear
,,=!,
2 .....
n--l,
(27)
107
with
boundary
or
Yo=
-- y' +4yz-3y
2h_
=y_,
Y.=Y=
(282)
approximation (20) in 1, and the (21). form (29) we We
to
obtain as the
the
(s + follows:
1)-th
proceed seek
solution
of
problem y_ = al_)yv+,
(27),
+ a__,
_ = I,
hi sz)
aL')
l cr., + _L_ al_-_ for
- L,4)+ h_c.,
LI al ) + (2c,_ - h_c,_) hic2v c_J i=1,2 ..... r, (31)
+ (2c,_ --h_ l,
ni-z_*<n
1 cw @ _- hi+z C_v L_A__-_> + (2c,.,, for._=n_, i=I a_+, %,) ..... r--i,
, A_"-')=
a_v-_
aLv-'
i=1,2
C4V
.....
r, (32)
LvA_v-I)
Lv
__
n,,
i =
I, 2 ..... r--l,
r, (33)
ri=l,2
.....
civ=cj(_v),
]=1,2,3,4. (34)
108
With
boundary
conditions
and
with
boundary
conditions a_O_ =
(282) 4 40) -3 ' the forcing and then (29) are solution given _+
(z)
2 h, Y_, 3
.(o)
From
(30)--(34)
we
find
of increasingv(v=l,
2, 3.... , n)o
(vfn--l, n--2 ..... 1, 0) we The forcing formulas size mesh*. 3 . equation Newton's (15e)'is methodfor reduced
in the /3/
s to the
iteration
_!
(z).
_.(_ (s)
(*)
(s) (s)
])+ _"
q=0,],2
....
(35)
k,(3t. kq+2) (t) As the initial approximation we at q=qo for which the inequality
(s)
assume
iteration is terminated
(s)
I k_-,--kq]
(s)
<%
= 10_ the cubic (15e) has a single approximations. various values the results
(36) positive
of !, (/) > 0.
for
of are
(0) (0)
showed initial
that
regard iterations
i_, _,
achieve
(0)
accuracy
s depends
on the
iv.
_.
For
example,
when
_,was
taken from the table in /2/. applying linear interpolation _0) points, and i. was calculated
p. 529 (the column corresponding to _= 2.0). for the corresponding intermediate grid from
(o)
i,=
I -_- (1
___
)+B(l--_,).
(0)
(37)
where
B=
1 0 for i' (0) = 0, " ----2' for i(0)=i., e= 10-Svaried from 7 to 10 depending on the
of iterations x, m, _o.
(0) (0)
for
set will
l0 -s and
the
same
parameters
18--20
required.
difference Computational equations Center of of second Moscow order State in the case of variable-size see. e. g. ,/6/. mesh has been
scheme used at
previously
Universit),,
109
as in the
the
initial computer
approximation memory, we
storing following
a great initial
many
numbers
(o)
and to
(37).
(o)
We at the
_ /2/
points
when
are
used).
of initial
requires the same number of iterations as are necessitated data from /2/. The function (38) is a rough piecewise-linear to the function _v given in /2/.
4.
VERIFICATION AND this and the for numerical compared column the to the the system
METHOD
method, we made a control calculation for the the results with the table in /2/, p. 529. We for _ = 2.0. If we take i= !
2
equations
differential boundary
integro-differential
y = --m
conditions _ (0) = 0, _ (_) = 1. of lthe following values of the m=--7, B0=0, f=l, g=l, g=l.4. 0_< _ ,.<5 and making h=0.05 and constant
parameters Replacing
to
0 _<_ < +c_ by the interval with constant mesh size approximate of 1.4% and Making h,=0005, values values values 0.12%,
in this interval calculations mesh size h=0.0125, we a maximum values in mesh size approximate
obtain
deviation /2/.
points in the interval 3 _< _ _< 5 in all these cases differed by at most from 1. Note that for _ --* + _, _b(_) behaves as 1 _- c0ns_.e-'_', where H =const > 0, and that in choosing the interval 0 _ _ 5 for calculations set Xb(5)=l. Replacing the interval 0__<5by mesh values of the interval0 _<<3and boundary by at making a calculation _(3) = 1, we obtained 0.1% from h=0.0125 seemed with constant approximate size h=0.0125 and _'(_)=$(_) differing
values
size results
satisfactorily
110
the was
interval
0 _<_l
and
of the
mesh
size
other
combinations
of the
known
constants
assumed sufficiently fine and the length large if the values i(_), _(_)in the interval the boundary values i(l) =0, _(/) _l, Shl and doubling of the corresponding points by mesh size at most 0.1%.
We observe that increase of _0 entails an increase of the interval length I. For example, we had to take the interval 0 _ _ _ 30 for the following parameter values: m----0.25, z= 1.4, _0_100, o==0.72, i, =0.25. With this large gives interval, too low the fixed-mesh accuracy. alternatives calculation We therefore calculated, occupying had to as the minimum working memory resoi_t to variable mesh size. was made finer, the and _ monotonically increased, definite limits*.
In all
mesh
values _ (_} = _'(_) for any given ally dec reas ed, both approaching
5. The parameters
OF was
FOR
SEVERAL for
above
in calculations
boundary
f=l, x _ 1.4;
a==0.72;
m = -- 1; i_ = 0; 0.1; 0.25; i. ffi 0; _, ----0; ! m .... i w = O; 0.25; i= = O; _e ----- 0.5; 2; I0: I00; O; 4' m ffi ----; z = 1,2; m=--l; m= ! ----; 4 i_ffi0; i_=0; i,_=0; i'_=O; [_0=0; _0=0; 0.5; 2; 10; ]00. l 4 i_ = 0.1; _o _ 0; 10;
The
1--4. of the layer. parameter For _0 on example, Blasius increase, the effect the with case. and of due the value
_=l characterizing _0=100and i_ =0, This is probably effect of increasing increasing viscosity The parameter to
is apparently u=_(_) is
drop in enthalpy. the boundary value of the than boundary for the
velocity as velocity
(characterizing concerned}
so far
* This regularity may be established theoretically. method will be discussed in another paper.
111
r.o /ag3... _2 _6
0.6
@.4
05
fxt a3"
0.3
4tl. -_
[---t-_k,,_l
"x_
Q2 O..f
t
I
I !
2.
f
FIGURE 1.
b
Enthalpy
_
i vs._
a
=
T
_
"1
"_
r I
2
Velocity layer
0
FIGURE
3
profiles with
',"
5
u=cp'(_)in
7_
boundary
2MeT
(11, are the boundary Dorodnitsyn layer with variables) 13_0 in
13=0
"_
o,
o t 2 3 *
FIGURE
I
_
3.
l
Enthalpy
0
i vs._
$
for
!0
13=100
t!
15
The boundary no effect on the at higher _0. The of the slender calculations boundary bodies
value velocity
of
;=0 for
and the parameter 130=0; 0.5,but have the on over effect the a wide
virtually effect
estimate stream
pattern
at high supersonic
velocities,
of the parameter
130,characterizing
the slenderness
112
_e
II _7
IJ
FIGURE 4. In the the conclusion, we formulation and for of constant his seminar extend of discussion attention
Velocity our
profiles to
_=I00 Lunev for of are Kh. the discussion values thankful IRakbmatulin to of of G. and S.
physical parameters,
the
choice We and of to
numerical also A.
results. work
Roslyakov participants
for
discussion
results.
m BLIOGRAPE.rY I. Ik]NEV, V.V. Avtomodel'nyi sluctmigiperzvukovogo obtekaniyaose.simmetrichnogo tcla vyazkim teploprovodnym _zom (SelfSimilar Hypersonic Flow of ViscousHeat-Conducting Gas Pastan Axisymme_ic Body). --PMM, Vol. 24. No. 3. 1960. 2. LOITSYANSKII, L.G. Mektmnika zhidkosti gaza (Mechanics of Liquids i and Gases).--GITTL, Moskva. 1957. 3. BEREZIN, I.S. and N.P. ZHIDKOV. Metody vychislenii (Numerical Melhocls),Vol. II.-- Fizmatgiz, Moskva. 1960. 4. RICHTMEyEP,_ R.D. Dif/erenceMcthods fortheSolutionof Boundary-Vaaue Problems. [Russian tran_ation. 5. 6. 1960.] COLLATZ. PASKONOV, L. Nume.rische V.M. Methoden Zt_ AuflSsung von Differentialgleichungen. of Boundary-Layer --Springer Problems. (Berlin).
A smnd_d
Program
-- This volume.
113
IlL
VISCOUS
FLOW
class
equations
of
mathematical
physics
equations express laws momentum, energy, principle follows from this is the conservation particular, for Maxwell Following S.K.
of conservation of mass)and, moreover, the basic equations. for this is shall of entropy; equations), /1/, we
For equations of gas dynamics, equations of crystal optics (in the conservation consider equations of energy, etc. of the form
Godunov
i=
1,2 .....
m,
(i)
k=O,l
.....
n.
calculus, of gases,
smooth
of
system
(1)
conservation
0 _t (_-_ q'Lq,t--1
Ll) =0,
(2)
be can
interpreted be extended
of energy or to irreversible
models for systems having an "exact" law of energy conservation of the form (2). This problem was first posed for the Navier-Stokes equations for viscous incompressible flow (which, incidentally, do not belong to class (1)) by A. N. Kolmogorov at the seminar on problems of turbulence models will The author the form held in 1958-1959. possibly imply some is not familiar with We first consider A study of the ergodic properties of these properties of the continuous case also. any work the case in this i=i=l, direction. so that the equation Oq (3)
takes
114
(thedissipativeterm hasbeen added the right-hand in side), whereit is assumedhat Aq(q) q--A(q) > 0 and C (q) > 0. For simplicity t we shall consider
a Cauchy problem with periodic _q. (t, O) = Oz_ Other of boundary conditions can be boundary a*--Eq if,/), Ox analogously condition k = O; I. treated, including the for z: (4) case
a region unbounded in x with the relevant We multiply equation (3) by q and transform follows: q_O Aq(q) =_
at infinity. terms as
_) (_)
q _Oz Bq (q) = _
Hence,
in view
of (4),
i
we
obtain
the
identity
T 1
(the law of dissipation of "energy" Aqq--A). We shall attempt to construct a finite-dimensior_al model of the problem (3), (4) which would _!ow analogous transformations to be made in the difference equation approximating equal to/_; (3). kffi0.1 In the ..... interval N, h_ 1 _: (0, Owe the define points with abscissas considered half-integral The required at xa their at (qk+l--q_). points: xk as
points
Points with the abscissas (k_-l/2)h will play an auxiliary role in our
functions q_ (t), kffi0, 1..... N, approximating are assumed to be defined for the integral explicit half-integral We also and implicit values determine "derivatives" of the the index, with i.e.,
the solution of equation (3) values of the index, while respect to x are considered
we
shall
write
_q*T=-_l
ndrift"
of a function
q_ at half-integral
_+',. = _ (q_" + q%
For functions _ have the following and b rule _, which are of "summation periodic on the by partsn: grid, we obviously
of which Consider
we
will the
make
much
use. to equation (3). _ Aq (q_). dt term at integral _ o (C(q)-_-) points, i.e., we the reason functiow as follows: The term 0 --_Aq(q) is clearly
approximated To the
by the
expression
approximate
dissipative apply
approximation
C(q)-_z
115
should
be approximated
l
at half-integral
!
points;
the
approximation
1
C (_q_+ _)_qk+
!
_-(in
case variables,
take below).
p.C(q)k+_gq_+-g; We now
with write
not
so -- see
analog
Z
k
g (C (_q) gq)_'q" = -- Z
k
1'
(here
the
periodicity
of
into
i.e.,
q0 = qN--,
q,=qN).
terms,
Bq (q). and we
moreover
obtain lead
formula
oq
Ox
o ox
B (q). These
requirements
B_
_,+ _l _ (q).
The We
of the system
first
term
does
not
differ
from
(a).
d Aq(qk)+_(Bq(q))k=_(C(_q)_q)k dt with the periodicity conditions qO=q,V-j, has the "law of energy dissipation"
T
'
k=O,
1,..
"'
N,
(6)
q,=q_
(7)
The
sum
in the are
in the
right-hand densities
side
is
made
up
at corresponding
grid
systems
n 8Lqt _'_
of the
form
i=1,2 .... m, (1!)
OLjql
O---_- bi. s
Oql
_
j=l
Oxj
A_ OxI
j.l.s
and positive-definite
processes),
the construction
is carried
out analogously.
116
author has not succeeded in his attempt to construct a difference scheme with a rectangular mesh for the case of more than one space variable; tetrahedral nets were used, which had been first introduced for similar (and more general} For metric purposes simplicity, by V. L Lebedev consider the ]2/, case whose of two work space we shall closely follow. p,, p_ with the variables
dss = (g_)' dp_ .+ (g')' d_, (curvilinear The linear coordinates orthogonal coordinates). operators
do = g'_dpldp,
(9)
of mathematical
physics
in these
grad_={-_(
av ' ap,
1 e'
_} a,_,
' (10)
,oo,
rot_= es Ops ' e_ opt ' (A'being a vector, _' a scalar suitablefortheverificationofrelations of various forms of the function of p,, P2). Formulas {10) are as suchas r0tgrad xI,-- 0 and div rot of the type Srot VAdo---The --
A'=0,
Ga_,s_
formula
fVrotAd,,
as the corresponding
formulas
in Cartesian
coordinates.
difference
approximation to the operators (I0) amounts to the foUowir_. A uniform grid of points is introduced on the p,, p_-plane, as shown in the diagram. These points are labeled by indexes (m, n) and (m _- '/2, -_ '/2),nd called n a introduce integral points. Between an auxiliary "half-integral every two such "integral _ points we _ point (m, n_- '/2)or (m _- '/e, n):
m,n-+-I 0 i ,n___ I m----_-_ O m_l,n o m-, rn-1 n 1 2 ' --T 0 2" n I 1 1 rn, n-@ --- rn -b-_ , n -_ -_* 0 l m,n mq-.-_-,n ra+ l,n 0 , o m,n --T I 1 m-t1 T'n-T o 1
* m, tl_ o
The at integral
function points,
and
the while
of even of odd by
defined defined
points. with
expanded for _m
2)substituted
example,
117
roth ,_o.o= _ [_1(g,A=)o.o_ _=(gtAt)o.oI = go,o go,o =_[(g2 go.o go,o --(gJ A_ __ "T' T.o ,A' i--g o, T o.T 2 A2 )__ - _,o - _-,o
I _A z ,)1 o,--_ o.-- T clearly (+_+, i.e., unit should consider the vector
value
of rot_,_ at the
at point
(0,0)we points
half-integral
0). (0, _+ -_)). the weight with Pt, p2 intervals). analog which the
to
that be
finite-difference
at (0,0)
L, '..... ,5'I-"
L_=
L t
'.....
q= 2 o
I
v'l
q2 o
,
(ii) L2 = ql '-_
' 2
_ q_
o,--A
2
.__
--Y
-'
_)
(the are
manner carried
different). case.
The The
other law of
manipulations energy
dissipation
Lq_q_
a,_ T ;-t
It-O
a',_" l,s,/_ where The a, _ run through assumptions imply as let of that all integral and and term a',6"through all half-integral matrix positive model plane points.
symmetry every
of the
of the
a', _' is
density of energy dissipation rate. us consider the problem of the difference flow. The Navter-Stokes equation in the
2
Out + _
ot
_ o_j
i = l, 2,
/-I
div u = 0.
118
Let are
us again treated
periodic boundary conditions (conditions Integrating the incompressibility function #_: _(xl, x2) such that _----=.Ox,, .,, _
introducing obtain
an equation
(12)
law
which
is obtained term
by multiplying
The
nonlinear
of the phenomenon.
it is by no
means immediately clear how to write a difference scheme with an expansion of the nonlinear term which would have this property (this is chiefly due to complications in constructing difference quotients products}. We therefore rewrite equation (12) in the form _a The nonlinear term does A_ = rot [rot _ X Agl Jr_AWp. not enter ,)dx, (13) because of the evident d_; relation for
(14)
_S (rot [rot #pA], the mixed product twice. It follows that this propert] orthogonal is trivial. We
,'Ix== --_S
(rot _b A, roi,)dx,
in the integrand from our method is also retained "Integration thus shown that
identically vanishes because rot_ enters of approximation of differential operators in difference formulas (in any curvilinear n in differences the system of the linear terms
coordinates). have
-hh @=_ = r0th h @ a_l "_ -i- A_ _a [rot _ with periodic law (or adherence) boundary conditions
T
dissipation
a',p"through
A_ = divA gradA= -- rothroth, In conclusion be used to obtain very large arbitrary and A.A. we observe that
difference
schemes
properties.
class of ordinary differential accuracy) were constructed Samarskii (see, e.g., ]3/).
119
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
GODUNOV, --DAN
sistem
(An
Interesting
Class
of Quasilinear
Systems).
2.
O metod
dlya
utavnenii F_tuations).
v ehastnykh --Izvestiya
ptoizvodnykh AN SSSR,
(On seriya
a Difference matemati-
of Partial
Differential
3.
TIKHONOV, Schemes).
SAMARSKII. noi
Ob
odnorodnykh
skhemakh No. 1.
(On 1961.
Uniform
Difference
Vychislitel'
Matematicheskoi
120
2 L/6
A. NUMERICAL L. KryIov STUDY ROTATING and E.K. Proizvolova BETWEEN
OF FLOW CYLINDERS
We
consider 28):
here a viscous
the
following incompressible
(for is
more enclosed
see
/I/, coaxial
18, 26,
numbers
simple stationary flow independent and gives way to a different regime independent obtained by .... perturbations). phenomenon experiment. of the Taylor angle, periodically experimental!y, Our aim is to carry nonlinear assume
height flow
becomes which,
still were
height.
These
and also numerically (using s_nall _ . out a numerical analysis of th_ the formulation, flow to be coordinates in accordance with periodic in height an_t have the _x_-_ form (see
in cylindrical
/2/,
Oh. l)
_+,,_+_ o_
,p +,____8r k
rt _ 2'
+_
am _
ap + *hi
and
the
incompressibility
condition
__o
a-_--(ru)+
Here a =-_-
the _.
velocity
components a stream
Introducing u==--
function,
--,
of incompressibility for _ and
.:-.,
/-
we
integrate p,
the obtain
equation
and, v:
eliminating
the
pressure
a system
{1)
121
T =
where
1 a , _ 1
L = -a-fi-r*-t- -_- --_t -t We periodic seek a solution in the conditions domain in z: rl_<r
az,
<r2,--H<.z<H.
boundary
dz t
z---H
az t
az m
_--H
az m
z-H
(2
t)
m=0, solid
*=_-I
or j r-r/
mentioned v=Ar+
above _,
T
has
the
form
Q=----O, where A and B are constants which i=1,2, and are independent ofv. sufficiently large v (with constant v = vet. This Equation phenomenon (1} and the
in terms of Ot and r_, flow is stable for all beeomes unstable for replaced by corcylinder
responding difference equations rl -_<r _ r2. --H < z _ H we set up rm=r z.=nk; lq-mh;
boundary conditions. with constant and .... ..... p=0, M; hi r_--r_M ; k= P. px will is taken
On the z intervals:
N,N+I; 1.....
U _---;
(3)
The _.,
values v_.
of The
_ and
v at the
be
denoted form
by
difference La_.
approximation
in the
_, __.
(4)
where L n, M n, Nh are difference operators differential operators (Ln is a linear and more detail, see /3/). This upper amounts layer has to a two-layer the form scheme,
in
(5)
of our
0; we therefore
122
hope
with the
of is
of moderate system
Reynolds
determination {@_0, _,
notations
_f___}
form
-1 ,_ _ 1 --P+! -t -1
(6)
.....
M--2;
"WAI--I
_---
_vM--2,
(7)
{ _:,+t _'=o,
The vectors _ satisfy the
1 .qZ.p+x
=-_+1
_'
--o.1
X,_-.t-- l
periodicity
_rn,--2 -a'm,N_2,
condition
rn,--I
Cm, D,,
E m in (6)
are
all
symmetric can
and be obtained
cyclic. from
A the
a_+_d = ai.i-_ (i,j.---O,1,...,N--1). row. The cyclic is also a cyclic _r= "vectors" A cyclic matrices matrix. {x_} with the
thus completely defined by its a ring; the inverse of a cyclic to interpret cyclic matrices
x+_r={x,+y,};
i
cX = {cx,};
N--I
12-,,,-, 2:,,,+,-,};
k=O k=i + l
k--O
(X-_
is the
first
row
of the is
cyclic
matrix
which that
is the
inverse
of the
matrix whose are essentially coordinates conditions; System in this case consecutive
operations with cyclic always appear when one case, also in boundary forcing, for
our
will
method Consider
of matrix two
which three
relations
123
, w_+_, v_+2,
_
which
_
for
rn__2 _Urn__
i,=m--2,
1
m--l,
take
the
form:
_+!2 _+-',
Inserting these relations
m _ura__
m = 0, 1 using
cylinder:
Xo=Yo=YI=O, where Direct and only obtained vectors once (for the last E is the forcing Z_+_ all unit matrix. involves from p), forcing successive recurrence where Z_ relation
XI-_'-4-E,
_0,
of should number.
matrices be
Y=
depends
to
determine M--3
_+___, .....
and
then, is
(9), reverse
we
-_+_ for at
for
m = M--2, V_ is solved
2. This
corresponding
the
cylinders
have
_o p+_ = where We were Reynolds e= now made (1, I ..... proceed for number a grid was 1). with with thus an
f_r_e,
-__ =
_r,_,
of N = by
numerical fl, =
dimensionless
viscosity
801
I
/Z
tfi
2'_
28
Y2
36
49
FIGURE 1.
Variation
of tlt in time:
I--==
-_-,
H=l;
II--
=-_,
n=2l.
1456
124
As initial
simplest We Reynolds establish which is were
values
_0,
v_
we
assumed
distribution
of
_,
v close
to
the
solution. concerned 1 v --- _, of find with the the possible following periodic problem: regimes; in the part given a constant
existence under
"stronger"
frequencies perturbations.
infinitesimal
r-t
P.,_
3l
lli
for H=41
(flowM)
Computations
were
In with a
the pair
first of
and
the
second
flow period.
obtained, to growth _} is of
counter-rotating is I is shown
regime flow
gentler
amplitude
125
smaller. principal The harmonic growth stationary This spectrum rate of time one
I is
less
intense
than
flow
II.
In
the
second flow
the
in
by the entirely
gentler different,
the has 21 so
infinitesimal by the principal repeated Lavrent'ev the frequency is of is theory. influence projects work, guidance Yu. on
in
case the
(Lavrent'ev limit). This We contributed of stability continuation are in also the In conclusion wish
a rod
our
problem, also
strongest from
2/(frequency
stability 2x a =_=
3.2).
to
thank
Gel'land initiation
and
active
numerical in particular, of I. M.
Gormatyuk
who
participated
program.
BIBLIOGRA PHY 1. 2. 3. LANDAU, L.D. and E.M. LIFSHITS. Mekhanika Stability. sploshnykh --Cambridge sred (Mechanics Univ. Press. of Continuous [Russian translation. Media). 1968.] --
1954. of Hydrodynamic
ZHIDKOV, N.P., A.A. KORNEICHUK, A.L. KRYLOV, dvizhenie vyazkoi zhidkosti mezhdu vrashchayushchimisya Fluid between Rotating Cylinders). --In: "Vychislitei' MGU. 1962. LAVRENT' EV, M.A. Kumuiyativnyi zatyad Principles). --UMN, 12(4): 76. 1957. i printsipy
and S.B. MOSTINSKAYA. Pioskopatallel'noe tsilindrami ( Plane-Parallel Motion of Viscous nye metody i programmirovanie," Izdatel'stvo ego raboty (Cumulative Charge and Its Working
4.
126
A. STABILITY
L. Krylov OF
and
VISCOUS
RO TA TING
CYLINDERS
k neutral number
), spectral
properties Poiseuflle
those
equation
of sta_
viscous flow between rotating concentric If u. v. 0v are the velocity, components along stationary solution (1)
"trivial"
u=w=o,
where
_--_+_.
A=
\R_/
% el /
'
B=--
(R"
\ Rl ]
1
velocities amounts system (] = 1,2). [ 1 [, Ch.
(see
1)
properties
(L-.@----_--==a=O L_
(,_-.), =2 (A+
(L-- _.,-- oR)v= 2_.4_,
for a_ 0 k I r r=R d dr i ! rs (j=l,2),
(2}
Here
X and
o are
parameters
which
can
physically
be interpreted
as
z-
and
t-frequencies of the solution (X > 0, a = ol + io2). For given for which the homogeneous o -- 0 is called neutral curve in the (R, X)-plane
for small perturbations X and a we must find problem (2) has to stationary to the neutral
solution R case
a nontrivial
127
neutral curve. called the c ritical "trivial" solution. The by Taylor /2[. The
The least (in k) Reynolds number on this curve is Reynolds number; it is the stability limit of the number ideas for this problem of Taylor, who was first determined the solution
approximated
by a linear combination equation of the infinite developed With in ]3, high-speed 4/.
the coefficients by zero, were further to solve problem direct more (2)
which evident
of Poiseuille flow where giving a small coefficient the above procedure to later
leading derivatives the neutral curve Thomas /5/. 2. procedure Jackson, Setting from To obtain
and
developed
Numerov,
_) = r-_-_ (2).
and
v = r- Y u, we remove
the derivatives
ds__+_+ and
dr s
d___v
dr
substitution,
system
(2)
takes
the
form (2')
3
/'3
D = k4 -_
3
2
_,2
r2
63
16r I
F = -- 2kRA.
If we
replace
the
derivatives
l _(IV) _ h.__ _
using
the
ordinary
difference
formulas
((_i+2
--
4_i+i
_i
--
4_Pi-I
-l- qDt__),
of the order
of h 2 per
step.
A similar
error
To
reduce
the truncation
error,
128
where
52 is the
second _'z
central 2x_ +
difference
xl_ l = x (f + h) -- 2x (r) + x (r -from setting the order the ! k, = -(, of h 4. conditions [1---We
and
the
coefficients It we obtain is
easily an
accuracy estimates:
formulas
and
u_=-_-L+,+ TL +-_Y_-,,
dr* _i = _'gi + -h*g {_ h* ,
d" u,=
'
'
h'Y(_'l
Omitting
terms
of
the
order
of +
h 4, we
rewrite
system _+
(2')
in
the
form
A-,gf+, + B_gi+,
, + Aigt-
(3)
where
At= I- h-L(---_ 12
Bi=__4__ 2_2_h2[ 2_ 3 3 \
' -
2_') _'
3 2 3 h' ri
+2k')-_
C_ffi6+
2r_
+2_'
h_
_'4
3 __(
\_,_
3 _.
_ "-_-_+ 63)
gg
F, = - --_-_ _,
3
= 1--_--L/-}-3 + x'),
H'=--2--Sh'(_--_-, _6 +_')"
129
The
boundary
are
also
approximated
to within
h4, as
in
pairs
recurrence
(4) [l = =lgi+l -_- _tgl+2 -_- VJi+l, where the recurrence coefficients formulas X_, Y_, Z_, at, _, W are expressed in terms of the coefficients of at two preceding are simply expressed by system certain (3) at the points of the and find
/-the r__
point and the forcing coefficients and r0 the forcing coefficients coefficients of the equation. For relation
points. At in terms
the forcing coefficients endpoint. It has the form X,,_,_ l )gn _ O. then g_ = 0 and,
(5) as is readily
If the
factor
preceding
g_ does
not
seen,/_+l=f,=0. It then follows from i.e., the problem has a trivial solution curve can thus be written M(X, R) If M = 0, we can take gn _a 0 and
(6}
16, 26 points. An analysis of the with n = 16 and n = 26 do not differ practical purposes, i.e., the is independent of h and therefore the differential, as well as the differ20--25 were sec of the STRELA required to find to
A IO / ts $ $ / / /
the root R of the equation M(X,R) =0 within 10 -s for a given X with n = 16. 3. We see from the graph that the Taylor flow has a neutral curve with two branches, one of which approaches the axis X = 0, infinityinbothRand unlike Poiseuille of Taylor flow the is and
(
0 _oo2003oo_9o_oot0o_ critical Reynolds number program of the calculated number was
.i _o
other recedes to _. Therefore, flow, all the frequencies become X) root unstable. of the (in
the
eventually
The
R which
equation of the neutral curve (6} is equal to nonstationary case a = _ q-i_2 was calculated curve for _ = 0. The Computational Center Reynolds 1959/60. was run on Moscow State in the
Z = 3.2. The general to the neutral computer at the The critical of G. Tolstova in
M. Sc.
130
Table
of results
! 0.I 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 I.I 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.! 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 1189.725 596.167 398,941 300.726 242.135 203.368 175.941 155.594 138.978 127.661 i I7.TJI 109.627 102.921 97._5 9'2.566 88.541 85.110 82.182 79.667 77.518 75.674 74.10_ 72.?69 71.648 70.717 69.954 69+347 68.879 68.541 68.318 68__204 68.191 68.272 68.443 68.697 69.030 69.438 69.916 70.463 71.075 71,749 72.483 73.274 74.114 75.013 75.963
4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5,2 5,3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 9.0 9.1 9.2
76.963 78.013 79.109 80.251 81.437 82.668 83.941 85.256 86.610 88.004 89.438 90.909 92.417 93.964 95.543 97.161 98.812 100.498 10'2.217 193.969 105.752 107.563 109.409 111.287 113.195 115.131 117.097 119.092 121.1t5 123.166 !25.249 127.355 129.491 131.653 133.842 136.057 138.296 140.560 142.851 145.168 147.5O8 149.874 152.267 154.675 157.113 159.575
!o.?
iU._
i]
10.4 10.6
!!1o.5
;+ 107
i ii i:! _,+ {0.8 10.9 11.0 11.1 11.2 II. 3 11.4 ll.5 11.6 ll.7
i _
il ii ,
12.0 11.9 12.1 12.2 12+3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.8 12.9 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4
ii 13.5
15.0 17.0
ij
162.060 164.569 167.101 169.652 172.230 174829 177.451 180.095 182.761 185.449 i88. J59 190.801 193.645 196.413 t99.117 202.0(}9 204.847 207. 732 210.613 213.515 216.437 219.380 222.345 225.330 228.335 231.360 234 4O7 237.473 240.560 243 667 246 7_ 249.942 253.110 256.208 259.505 262.733 265.980 269.248 272.535 275.840 279.170 282.517 285.870 340.080 415.920 546.510
mBUOGRAPHY
1. 2.
LIN,
C.C.
Theory G.J.
of Hydrodynamic of a Viscous
SmbiUty. Liquid
-- Cambcidg Contained
Univ. Two
Press.
[Ruman
translation.
1968.] Trans.,
TAYLOR, A, 223,
S_tbiiity 1923. S.
between
Rotating
Cylinders.
-- Phil.
289-343.
3.
The
StabLUty
of Viscous
Flow
between
Rotat/ng
Cylinders.
-- Proc.
Royal
Soc.,
tea,
301-311. of the
1958. Galetkin 19S5. PoLseutlle Flow.--Phys. Rev., 93(4): 780-783. 1953. Method to the C.alcula_o[x of the Stability of C_ved Flows.
4,
DI PriMA. --Quart.
13:5,5--62.
5.
THOMAS,
Stability
of Plane
131
and
T.
INCOMPRESSIBLE
1. Two-dimensional is described by the nonstationary equation at where x-axis, _ is the stream the function, velocity
ay _ = u 0g component
Ox is the along
ax
-q_ = v is Ox
viscosity. Numerical These difficulties not explicit the solution solution varies
solution are
of due
equation to the
(l)
involves
considerable first,
difficulties. equation (1) is third, at small in which the i.e., methods intensely of
following
reasons:
second, it is nonlinear, the boundary of the region a boundary methods, as layer, the
generally behaves as normal to the boundary. apply semi-analytical and Galerkin, the problem mount estimating methods. possibilities the rapidly
Attempts
Kantorovich (the ray method) viscous flow show that as programming procedures. difficult promising computational It is quite is a complicated task as difficulties Moreover, with these regard accuracy. obvious that problem. the
of nonstationary complicated, the of error seem and standard is a very more estimating the
with respect to t, method) a difference to ensure second additional iterations more complicated the "tripod" scheme, substantially variation mesh or
at every time section Poisson equation order must schemes etc.}. accuracy be made should The with at be
we must solve {by some iterative for @. As the equation is nonlinear, respect to the time interval, alternatively scheme, equation every time section, or employed {the three-layer derivatives algorithm, requires
fourth-order
in the
132
Until nowonlyvery,fewpapershavebeen published onthe application of differencemethods the solutionof nonstationary, r evenstationary to o problemsof viscousincompressible flowdescribed thecomplete by NavierStokes equation (see /1/--/6/). These works, however, mostly give no
estimates of the accuracy of the results. This is due to the exceeding cumbersomeness of the computations which generally strained to the the capacities of the techniques used, and also to obvious difficulties deriving approximate problems particular, tion of grid In the theoretical equation for evaluating to present investigate article parameters, estimates (1). of errors in difference necessary of difference as is choice processes. mad e (or_the_.mo_l equation .............. schemes to devise methods, of schemes, used model in determinaIt was therefore the effectiveness such and the of problems iterative limit of to
analysis
8t with constant (on suitable of this coefficients A, B, v. The Cauchy t > 0). by the as
conditions, integral
(x, y, t) = _ where
(3)
,_
schemes -X depends processes
and their respective here by comparison time of the exact and which the approximate mesh size question. and the
solution. Given the accuracy be computed, we can determine iterative with we which processes for the
scheme
In the present certain difference method various difference As an stability equations example of Poiseuille
the choice of mesh intend to investigate can be applied to the to these particular results, we considered
iterative
processes
The
remits
of one prosteithikh
simple
iterative
process protsessov
are
in the
author's
oshibok of Stability --
dlya
an Center
Allowance of Moscow
Navier-Stokes
Ec_ation).
Report
of the
Umversity.
133
$2.
THE PRINCIPAL CHARACTERISTIC first define not change i.e., some (to
THE MAIN RECTANGLE. ACCURACY STANDARD* concepts. Suppose accuracy) domain is that the solution integral by
us
pre-assigned integration
if the
if the
replaced
0<I_11_
The sides _,. 0 are determined inferred from they sometimes solutions, and eXt_ox _u 0 _<x-_-0, can be sometimes
,
by the
0_<Lo,1<o_.
smoothness previously data. of the solution required; found approximate A solution of the form
sufficiently accurate computation of the principal harmonic characterized by the number of grid points N(_, _ ) in the We shall show ( 4)that N, in a certain sense, is a constant independent determined axis y. total with equal total of _, co. Let the region parallel remark Q where the solution by L, long In view of the on the side preceding to the x-axis and concerning N, we
will be main rectangle. number is being Lj along see that harmonic rectangIes, _. The the the
required to compute the principal is proportional to the number of necessary to equal in order below,
L, L2 c0t 02 N.For 0_ 0
_2
considered
decreases accuracy
with decreasing
of estimating
the
on the principal
harmonic. To simplify the notations, we shall write in what follows _o:, 02 _ for _o ,_0 The relative error of the approximate solution for the principal harmonic at time t is
I--7--I
For small ! this error is
_t_
e_t = I_f__ t _ I [.
approximately we
to error. concept
Ik-
_I t.
The
'
This definition of characteristic variation of amplitude time
'
can be justified as follows. harmonic amounts, second, _((0_-_ co_))and,
(5)
According
of the principal
of phase (due to iA_ -_-iB_o2). If A = B = 0, then during the time the logarithm of the amplitude will change by I, and the phase
* The concepts introduced in this section and the general procedure employed were developed by L. A. Chudov in application to the equation ut = .cAu+Aux +Bu_ in his special course "Difference Methods for Solution of Parabolic Equations" given at the Moscow University in 1960/61.
134
constant. amplitude
If v = 0 {and Aeo_ q-B_2 will retain its previous by logarithm no more of the
0), value.
the
phase In the
by will
error
Tch_ is (6)
_ = 1_-,),_,_ The overall error with respect processes. processes, order of is made
up of the
errors
to x and y, of the derivative with When choosing the mesh parameters require that each as a small number
we shall smallness
will be called
standard (technically this is more convenient of smallness directly on 6). Approximate clearly characterizes optimum choice
of parameters.
SCHEMES. difference
_'J_
Here AM is the approximation to the
ffi_L_
operator
+ _'.,.
A= _ + _ __
(7)
on a grid with side satisfying the hka
to the operator
on the right-hand
interval;
a_, as weights,
conditions al+ a_ = l,al > 0.a2 >0; _., = _ (_, Id,nx). We now proceed with the description of the difference operators and L_. We shall consider two alternatives differing in order of approximation. Alternative A. Approximation error O(h2+12).
alk_)_m,
k =
dfm+l,k--2_m.l_h
41
_r_--IJt
.jr
dtm,k+l--2_m,k-_-_
_m.k--I
(8)
where 2/I 21
Alternative
B.
Approximation
error
O(h'_Jr-P).
( 1O)
135
1456
L(B) .I, f(A) _, _ 4 4
_-IA
(_....
23
+ _vuv_)%,,_] -2 2
(11)
Here
5x_.k
is the
central
difference is the
approximation analogous
to the approximation
A (_+_uyvv)q).,,k _ 4
o_ (o,+
The difference expressions computing the main terms difference difference case quotients equation
o,+
o,
(11) with were obtained from (8), subsequent substitution derivatives, will be The investigated (9) by of
of time-symmetric stability
_m.k
,h _ ---S_d_,_he_O,k_
these
to multiplication
(13)
s _A'=
+-%--]-,_
" 2 _2l \
[_--;-
+'-7-)J
(14)
For
alternative
B we have
Sty) I + a_:(P + Q)
(15)
2 1 + _- sin.
sin'_t/ 2 );
_,h _+ 2
(1
.+_2
'
Bsinwzl
Bx];
A t = 1 + 2-sin_
3
_xh +
2
C1 ]
B a=
1+
This
scheme
is actually Poisson
implicit, should
since be
only solved.
A_,t
_n_-I
_s determined
explicitly;
to
find
,@n+t
difference
equation
136
1
C'=T It is easily seen Indeed, consider that for _sint at = %=
_h+
_h__lsin, lthe 2
alternatives. Let us
now
Is It _ 1. scheme _d
(a t = 0, at = 1).
For
alternative
We now Case I.
cases.
,17,
sin__/__). (18)
Case
H.
v=O.
Then s= l+/x(A_+B
_= h
const,
*_2_= e0nst, t
then
from
(19)
we
have,
for
the
corresponding
indicates have
instability.
+ VbBin
m_/)t.
V_IB,)'T]
(20)
O_ rtt _ T.
is side
thus with
stable small
finite the z.
0 _t
_ T.
However, solution
if
right-hand
of (20)
approximate
$ 4.
SPACE INTERVALS ACCURACY IN investigate harmonic ext e_,_ e_'_ h, I, _)=_1 ,t errors
FOR h AND of
As
we
approximate an
137
Takingfirst _=
0 we
find
h and
l so
that
where
k is
the
accuracy
standard. _(_,,
From
the
general
formula
(13)
we
have
_, h, l, O)
( 21)
The
_, for with
differential A (scheme
is
given order
in 1, (4). error in
consider Then
particular
cases.
_-=-4_
(sin'-_
--
h'
'
= - _(,d ,_). +
The permissible h and I should thus be found from the condition
/ . , _h -s,n 1 _2+._4
-F
1\it__.___7._q_ ___....__//
The
left-hand
side
of (22)
can
be
rewritten
whence it is obvious that the errors due proportional to 0_ and (0_. We shall.first for the principal harmonic be _, we of the obtain order
to
h and require of k.
l are that
averaged with weights each of the errors the for _: (24) permissible
Designating equation
values of
th, e following
=
1 -- sinS'_
k.
table: (25)
o.os
0.392 4X4=16
The third row gives the approximate number rectangle which ensures the required accuracy. as follows. x-axis h = 2_. therefore y-axis, previously we is --,=
o1
of points in the main This number is determined rectangle parallel to the ____ = _p,_d, is to the have co, (it i.e.,
The the
length of the side of the main mesh of size mesh h is determined in this other is side, equal
the
The N,_
number _ _
intervals the
have observed
, which
N remains
constant,
regardless
of co, and
138
must to the
be
the spacings
ratio -i-
of =
the .
sides In say,
is case
---_ of
is
equal
ratio
of
magnitude, of a very
stability with
_mn+--/ 4 +.oh' we
2 \ ]
it
would
seem
can
determine
_P,,,=T'
the
formulas
++ '
The with second m_= formula ___t 10' gives 1 sin' _,, is close __ sin'_.____ _
+++
"I T "2
,+_
to
the
original
(24),
while
the
first,
already
e_
100k.
this
formula
we
increase error
times.
However,
determine accuracy We
(and
consequently by the
unaffected
decrease
-- iAsin Then
,,,h + h
iB
sin_/ l
k = iAo_
+ iBo_
I I:+
A+x
As,(, ++)+
+ B_ mill
B_
( I
sin ,._l
We sign. has
assume as in
that the
the previous
and
have
the for
condition "q,
the
o,/-_
where
is
the
root
of
the
equation
1 --
sin_._._ k. =
We
obtain
the
following
Jc N=N_z>(Ns
table:
0.001 0.01 0.06
0.0775
40 X 40= 1600 13X
0.245
13= 169
0._
6X6=36
(27)
If accuracy, absolute
Ao,
and
Bo, since
different "weights"
signs, A,o,
A _l 4-
it
is and
more
difficult B_ may
B_
to
the large
B_0,
Ao, I +
values.
case
requires
further
analysis
with
139
actual the
values general
of
A and case of
B,
and
will (2).
not
be
discussed
equation
_=ki+Xzz,
where
/sm
-_-
. , ,,,,t \
_-,= -4_
_H = i_',, =i(A x, -.---- _ (_ Then + _),
+ --9---: 'I
_,_______h B sin_,_) sin h + X,, = i_.,, = i (Acol + Boo,)
_f+_,
Hence exceed
_,
x_+_,_, _
relative error
_,,
(28)
of -_ does of the
not
for
error each
previously considered are imposed on h and of h and l in particular weights relationship for cases this way of the errors between I and II that is relatively
cases does not exceed l by the second case. problems we should of the two different
k. Stronger requirements To obtain more exact estimates take into consideration the (i.e., allow for the grids in of the achieved
cases
_z and _ll ). We see from a comparison the gain in the number of mesh points small, since Nt, _ 1.7N,.
5.
FOR h AND
Consider
L which
As in the _- from P is
preceding (21).
=, (_ + _).
Proceeding second order preceding h and l schemes of accuracy, obtain
Then
= _,_hh= 2
_,_t.t. 2
(29)
sin=? ?,
Thus
_ is
found
from
the
equation
140
2 1 sir_ ! +--_-sin=_ 1 . 1 + T=n'T for k N =NI"N= t various 0.001 7X7=49 0.2437 0.01 4X4=16 0.431 k _k.
The
results
of
computations
are
given
in
the
following
table:
these h and
results l to be
with
table
(25),
we
see
that (by
the a
considerably
increased
= O.
We Setting
have
k-=
Q,
where
Q is
determined
from
(15),
= we find 11 from
ca,h = o)=l,
(31)
I______
l__
=k.
The
results
are N=_z
k _(Ns be with
0.05 (32) I, by a factor accuracy. in the and preceding follows). the It can in $4 can be of about
I can used
scheme
second-order as (28)
general for e 1.
second To (29)
what
h and
I we
introduced
analogy
schemes. given
that the justification to this scheme also. 2. As in the the preceding results
of equations
and
B are depend
assumed on A. B,
to 0_,,
have c02.
like
Otherwise
S 6.
DETERMINATION
OF
THE
TIME
INTERVAL
In chosen (13)
choosing in and
the
time
T we procedure
shall
assume outlined in
h and S 4, 5.
l to
have According
been to
accordance we have
(21)
] -- _-k,
=_
(_,
e2;
h,
l. 0)(in _).
the
two
previous
sections
this
parameter
was
designated
= i, ]. s = _o+
The contribution of x to the
"
relative
141
is
estimated
by
the
expression
! 1
_, we
l
require SO that
6~k.
Tchar
The
n
characteristic
'
Tcna_ is of time
Tahar=_l
where n should
n is
period;
therefore
be
2'
the (33)it case
(33)
scheme For the relevant l
Let
us
first
consider from
symmetric
o.oo_ 11ol
o.ol 3
(34) on
the
retaining
Hence . lo (35)
7.
ON THE THE
CHOICE OF idea
OF
THE
ACCURACY OF
STANDARD
FOR FLOW
PROBLEM have an
STABILITY amount
POISEUILLE
In order in the solution the difference flow. Of the problem, methods. We enables give the the
to
of the
of computational
work
involved
of problems of stability of viscous incompressible flow by method, let us consider the problem of stability of Poiseuille several papers on approximate solution of the linearized work of Thomas /7/ is the results. as only one to utilize difference of equation (1)
Linearization
= _ (y) e-_(_o. The well-known d'_ dy4 where Orr-Sommerfeld equation is solved --a'_) for p.
(36
+ 2_ = 0j,_ velocity,
(37) _ the
kinematic
given
as an eigenvalue.
142
If Imc is
negative,
the
solution
infinitely
increases
in time,
which
indicates
The eigenvalues of equation (37) were a difference equation with fourth-order of mesh solution by Thomas o.3_,_+ +io.o_ intervals showed for was quite very sharp a ffi l and o.aoH+ +_.o142
large (50--100 in the main work), variations. We give the values of Reynolds numbers: o._+ +io._ 138)
various
+m._
! -40._7
We relative
see
from this table that the eigenvalues error of from 0. 005 to 0.08 to enable determined to X, we with any obtain degree of
had to be determined with a the sign of the imaginary part Extending this
of c to be requirement
reliability.
We scheme rectangle.
thus
obtain
an accuracy
standard
k ffi 0.001.
A second
order
difference Let
in h and I thus gives a grid of 40 X 40 = 1600 points For the fourth-order scheme, a grid of 9X9-the question of the number of main difference computations are made. is the rectangle --_'_x_, O_y<l.
rectangles In Thomas's
domain
For
x = _ we
have
periodicity
conditions;
conditions @ ffi _" = 0; for y _ O symmetry in the x-direction we have two half-waves, two times in this direction, i.e., in the intervals for second-order scheme and the More complicated y-direction, i.e., function number _, is
conditions: _' ffi _" ffi 0. Since the main rectangle is contained x-direction we should have 80 18 intervals for fourth-order scheme. of the _2, main rectangle let us consider than in the
is the problem of the length the value of _,. To determine _p,(y) - Imp(y), R = 10000 and same order which is a= I (see of magnitude
q_ = Rt_p(y),
of the
as r =, where Y is the d and d is the "width m of the peak We can conclude from the graph 10r, thus In the repeat In the obtain the points regards y-direction, the main range a grid for the of of
rectangle at least 10 times. space variables (39) we thus 400 X 80 = 32000 points for 2000 with scheme and fourth-order It is @ ! '-" y-length agreement Thomas's The for a linear equation method can with be of 20 X 100 scheme.
second-order
noteworthy
that
to the
the grid we arrived at close with the number of intervals in work (for the fourth-order scheme). in this fact, section are all quite they Indeed, even do not apply the Fourier which, although
estimates
transform
in regions
143
in distance we
the the
are
small
in vary
with
equations method e
Fourier
with in
nonlinear problem of
equation stability
accuracy grids.
required
Poiseuille
BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. 2. 3. 4. _. THOM, ALLEN, A. The Flow Past Circular Cylinders at Low Speeds. -- Proc. Roy. Soc. (A), 141: D. N., R.V. SOUTHWELL. Relaxation Methods Applied to Determine the Motion, J. Mech. and Appl. Math., --Jouznal of Fluid Mechanics. Number. -- Proc. Roy. Soc. 651. 1933. in Two 8: 129. 1955. Vol. 3, (A), Vol. 249,
Dimensions, ofaViscous Fluid Past a Fixed Cylinder.--Quart. JANSSEN, E. Flow Past a Flat Plate at Low Reynolds Numbers. No. 4. p.329. 1958. JENSON. V.G. p. 343. 1969. ZHIDKOV, dvizhenie Viscous Flow t_ound a Sphere at a Low Reynolds
N.P., A.A. KORNEICHUK, A.L. KRYLOV, vyazkoi zhidkosti mezhdu vrashehayushchimisya Cylinders). --In: Numerical
and S.B. MOSTINSKAYA. Ploskoparallel'noe tsilindrami ( Plane-Parallel Motion of nye melody i programmirovanie", Rotating Cylinders.-This
Viscous Fluid Between Rotating Izdatel'stvo MGU. 1962. 6. KRYLOV, A.L. volume. and E.K.
"Vychislitel'
PROIZVOLOVA.
7. THOMAS,
L.H. Th_ Stability Plane Poiseuille of Flow. -- The PhysicalReview. Vol.91, No.4. 1953.
144
IV.
SEEPAGE
PROBLEMS
and ERROR
SOLUTION PR OB LEMS
SEEPAGE
In this estimation
paper in the
the for
problem the
of convergence of the
and
solution
nonstationary
stationary seepage problems. These problems ing the influx of oil to an imperfect borehole In /1 / the ray method was applied without the solution of the stationary problem, which
arise, e.g., when considerin the radial-symmetric case. theoretical substantiation to amounts to a mixed boundary-
value problem for an elliptic equation with variable coefficients in the "rectangle" D {0 < r, _< r _ r2, 0 _ z _H}, where r and z are cylindrical coordinates; it is assumed that on some parts of the boundary the values of the normal stationary problem required derivative. present function paper are given, the while ray on other parts the values of its or
In the
we apply
method an
to a nonstationary
problem which is reduced to for a two-dimensional* parabolic itself to the [1, as a natural two-dimensional to the
analogous equation. of
mixed boundary-value The ray method in the plane equation, method and the ray enables
this case suggests applied in /2, 3, 4/ method the applied in The ray problem method to be
combination parabolic
5, 6/
two-dimensional
elliptic
equation.
0 _z_,H}, but also in the unbounded However, we shall dwell in detail in the unbounded case the solution equations of computations. The paralelepiped equation the ray method is by
domain D {0<r_<r<-]-*% on the bounded case only, of the system of ordinary no means problem simple and
convenient as follows:
nonstationary
boundary-value seek
Q = D X [ 0, T] we Ltt_ dmu +!
a function #mu
d. _
satisfying inside Q,
Ou _
Or
the
boundary
conditions u1 .... ul,_,,=_,(z,t) =_,(z,t) where for O<z<H, for Ho_z<H, 0 _< H o _< H: O_<t-_T, O_<t_<T, (1.1) (1.2)
That
is,
with
two
independent
space
coordinates
r, z
and
the
time
t.
145
Ou
OU _Z
_= z-H
,h Yl
Ir k
t)
r,<r<r2.0_.t_T, 0, O_:t_T,
(1.3) (1.4)
forO<z<H
and the initial condition u It-0 _o (r, in D, = z) always assuming that the natural (h (z, O) ------(P0(rl, z), matching conditions are satisfied: (1.6) (1.5)
The following scheme of the ray method is proposed for solving this problem. We construct the planes z=ih, i=0, 1..... M-{- l, where (M-_- ])h-_H and t = kT, k = 0, 1..... N, where N_ = T. The intersection lines of these planes will be called nodal lines. The segments of the nodal lines in the parallelepiped (r, ih, kT)=(r, Q form zt, tk,), a "grid" nodal consisting lines by of points the with the system coordinates Equation(1.0) of ordinary where r,_.<r_r_, O_<i_M-F-1, O_<k<_N. following
is then approximated on the differential equations Lh, [ulk (r)] -for where r,<r<r_,l_<i
a_u_k(r) .4 I drs r
dua (r) dr
_-_,W,k(r)--
_rut,(r)
=f_,
(r)
( 2. O)
<M,l_<k_<N,
The respectively
boundary
and
the
initial
condition
(1.5)
are
conditions:
u,_(r,)=$,(z,,t_),Mo+l_i_<M,O_k_<N, u_k(r,) = % (z_, t_), ufft(r) -- uot_ (r) h _ (r, t_), forr_<r-_r,, 1 _< i _< M,
(2.1) (2.2)
l..<k_<N;
(2.3)
% (z_, t,),
1 ..< K _ N, rx_r_<r_.
(2.4) (2.5)
U_o(r)=_o(r,z_),
146
The stationaryseepage roblemis reduced thefollowingboundaryp to valueproblem: in therectangleD { 0 < q _ r _ r_, 0 _ z _H} we seek a function
u=u(r, z}, satisfying the equation (3.0) Lu_= 8'u + I 0, _u _, 7-_-+--_-----f(r,z) and boundary conditions u_.,,=eh(z), H_<z<HwhereO<He_H; u _._,, _ (z). O<z<H; = O"[_z iz-o=#'(r_'" _L==_,(r). r,<r<:rs; (3.1) (3.2) (3.3') insideD
=
The scheme of the problem (3.0)--(3.4): ray method proposed
0<z<,.
in [1 / tares the following
(3.4
form for
L+tul(r)l
;! _+dr(') _- _
-+ (r) = f+(r).
1 _ i ..< M,
(M+ 1)h H; =
5(r_)=%(z,), M,+I<i<M-+-1, ut(r J = %(z_), udr)--_(r)=_/,(r), h O<_i_M M0= [-_]; + I, r, _r _r,;
(4.0)
(4.1) (4.2) (4.3) (4.4)
In 1 of the
present to the
paper
we
prove
the
convergence
solution (for
of T
problem nonstationary
h and boundary-
in fact proves the existence of a solution differential properties of this solution and a posteriori problem. of 1 and 2 in application to estimates of the error
prove its uniqueness. In 2we give a priori of the ray method briefly problems. for the In 3 we stationary consider
nonstationary aspects
$ I. AND
CONVERGENCE
OF
THE
RAY
METHOD
AND
EXISTENCE
UNIQUENESS OF SEEPAGE
SOLUTION PROBLEM
and 3) /'2 those parts of the boundary _, 2) q_l and xp2, and 3) *o, *_, _, are We shall retain these for the corresponding points of Q which do not
given, and write /" = F0 +/'_ +Fs. the previously described grid and By points of Q we mean the
parts belong
boundary.
147
to F, whereF
(2.5) can
is
the
boundary be written
of
Q.
Then
problems
(1.0)--(1.5)
and
(2.0}--
Q,
Ulr0=_0,
Ulr,=_,
Boundary
conditions
a function _S(r, z, t), whichis continuously D, has continuous fifth derivatives inside (1.1)--(1.4) will be called conditions. Definition. 1) u is ments 2) initial 3) i.e., u 6 W_f(q)]7/, 4) if F6 is the lateral surface of the of on the boundary smooth of D in the permissible five-fold A continuously (1.0), the (1.5) in
differentiable in a closed domain D, and satisfies the conditions classical function sense. Any such the function boundary that: satisfying
solution of problem (1) is a function differentiable inside O according and satisfies this equation; (1.1) first boundary conditions of problem in the classical sense; Q and has square-summable
equation
u satisfies condition u is
bounded
in Q, (3)
Q_{q +B..<r_<r,--_, contained permissible such conditions in Q, and function q)(r, we have kU(r, z, t) is satisfying z, t) satisfying the limiting
_<z-.<H--_,
any
other
function
boundary
=0, of F6 differentiable follow from of the the estimates function the other
(5)
where
v=u--W,
and
n is the
inward
normal
Observe that if u should be closed domain Q, requirements propositions. In this boundary-value section we problem first
in a
estimates
and S.N.
Bernstein's
of Q) forthederivatives quotients
difference
{_u_}, {_,iulk}, {_z_u_k}, Uik {_ },{_hu_k},_}ux,}, { the following of problem theorem, (1) are function such that qr (r, z, t)
{_Hutk }"{_-;-u_k}' {8,1tulk} , {_zu;k}' {_i_kJ we prove Theorem there exists at satisfying these 1. If the boundary five-fold conditions, %, least one boundary
conditions
0% Or ' t
(6)
and
also
8r s
'
Oz _
'
_t dz*
'
dt cgr _
Oz Or"
148
are bounded, and if the difference _o (r, z)_ (r, z, O)in arbitrarily narrow, but fixed strips 0 _ z _: v and H--V_. z <tt is independent of z and satisfies the matching conditions _, (rt, z)-- _ (rl, z, 0) _=0, % (r,, z)-- (q, z, 0) --=0, |
-_ [_e (r, z)-_ (r, z, O)l lr.,, :-- O, 0-_z _<H,
J
of the
(8)
then
the nonstationary
boundary-value
problem
solvable*.
I. e m m a 1 (maximum principle). Let a system of functions ua (O which are continuous on the closed segment 0< r_<r_.r2 and twice differentiable (with respect to r) at its inner points satisfy everywhere inside Q the inequalities _,(u_D>o ILh,(ui,)_0l . Then maxu_(r) [minua (r)l
Q O
is attained
on
F.
everywhere
inside
Q,
is simple,
by assuming
the opposite.
Lem ma 2. Let a set of functions u_, (r) differentiable with respect to r on the closed interval O<r_r_.r_ and twice differentiable with respect to r at inner points of this interval satisfy everywhere inside Q the condition L_ (u_) <0, ILk. (u_,) > 0]; on the boundary 1" the boundary conditions (2.1) - (2.5) are satisfied, and ,o _ O,ta _ 0, _2 >0 I% > 0, _1 > 0, _ _7 01. Then u_ (r) >/m = rnin_[u/_ (r) _ ma = max _lr0+r, r0+r, Proof. Observe that the ease Lh, u_>O reduces to L_u_O by subst/tuting-u_ for u_. We can therefore limit the discussion to the ease L_ U_a<O only. Then, from Lemma 1, u_ (0 cannot have a minimum inside the domain Q. If the minimum is reached on Fo-[--F_, the lemma is proved. It remains to show the impossih/lity of a m_nimum being atAained on /'2. Let the minimum occur on the face r=r_ at the point (q. z,. t_.)_Fs. By assumption, u'_(q) ffi@_(z_, t_)_0. We define in Q a subdomain O_{r_r_r_q-5. i=i,--l, io. ioq-l, k-_ko, k0--1}, where 5>0 is so smallthat 8_q- 5 < h_. We define in Q_ an auxiliary function
if _(r) -_ { (r--rO'+(r--rt)'O, if i=i,, i=i,+_ k=ko, k o1,
(9)
1, k=k_.
of the choice of _, we have L_. (v_)>0. Moreover, since minimum point, u_{r)>u_(ra) at all points of Q_, except the where for i = i,, k = k, we have the equality ui_(rt) = ut.t,(rO. there exists an > 0 such that ut_(_)-- u4_,(q) = d > _v:#(_)for ko-- 1. But then the function _i* (r) u_, (r) u_,_. r_)-_Vi,(r) = -( -
The existence and the uniqueness of the solution of problem (1) can also be proved with weaker requirements on I. _, _, either by the barrier method, o_ by passing to closures in appropriate functional classes, but here, for the sake of simplicity, we shall be content with Theorem 1.
149
is nonnegt=tive on w_k(r) >/0 everywhere -_r,.<rl+_. and pass dicts the If the _a <. 0, we would also should however, have We divide
the the
boundary of Q_. Now as inside Q'_. and consequently two sides of this inequality
L_, w_k<0, we have by Lemma ut_o(r) -- u@o(rl) > ,vt_,(r)forq by r-r, where 0 < r--
1 _<
r, < _,
as r _ rl + 0. We then obtain u;a0(r,) > _> 0, which contra_0-_0. Hence, urn(r) cannot have a minimum at any point were attained at a point hence should (r0, 0, tk,) _ F_, where by (r0, assumption z_ tko) i.e., we if
(q, z_,, tko)E r, . would have _u0_ (r0) :* 0, and be a minimum point, and r0 = r_ or r0 == r_. (r0, z_, t,.) E F_, then, of u_ (r0) = u0_ (r0), i.e., lie on the boundary, is we
contradiction. possibilities
3.
Let _ and
in
--L
2'
and a_v_k(r,),
constant
_ _. z, -_ H -- _, 0 _ t_ _ T. r,+ small <:r_r=---_, positive further O_zt_H--l, numbers, and the B.o_, (r)
[o_,(r)l_KmOa_ sufficiently
_, r are
r_ + _ _: r <. r= -- _, 0 _ t, -_ T,
where
1(1 is
independent
3 and
4 are
analogs
of the
lemma
in
]4]
mo=suplcPl,ro+r, mt=SrUPl*l"
Then
the following
estimate
for
the (2):
solution
of
the
difference-
differential
boundary-value
lu,,(r)l
+ (10)
H --/t ) --
2mr
_ -4-
q_ ._______m, ___ (z
)t + m, (rt_
(lot)
150
where
e_00
satisfies
the
following
conditions
for
0<_h_:
L=_=<--,<O.
Therefore, by
V,_lr.+r.>O.
Lemma 2, V_(r)_0
_*
r--r z
<0.
everywhere
_.V,_l.-o<O.
inQ, i.e.,
_.V._b-,>O
ff--k
"
-(z_
"P
Since the last inequality holds independent of s. we can pass L e m m a P r o o f. u_ = u-it-applying 6. Let Problem _ and (107. _tt of we (2)
for any e>O. and its left-hand to the limit as -.0 and obtain cannot have different (27 for u a _0. two different solutions f _-0,
_Lt is estimate
a solution
_ -_0,
and _p--_0,ando
of a solution of the difference(2) and derive for it an expression K0(_). in the To this end. we write the following vector-matrix ut--t,
in form: (11)
I0(_) and
of differential u,-b
equations +
where
f "*(') #,(r) =
I f.. (r)
(r) = f_ (r) " " ,(r. t,J k
f__,. (r)
{
1--2 10
A_
1_,,oo .... o[
.... 0
. o. !
0 .... 0 ....
o..
1
1 0
--2
l --1
The
boundary
conditions
(2.3)
have
not
been
taken
into
consideration.
If
the solution of problem (2) at the (k--l)-th time section find it on the k-th section it suffices to solve equation conditions (2.1), (2.2), and (2.47. By using an orthogonal
(--
l_+='_/"_,
l ,_i_.M,
$=M,
151
the
matrix
2 K$ 2M
A is
diagonalized /1,5,6/.
to A = B'AB,
with
diagonal
elements
-- ks,
where
ks=4COS--, After
I_<s_<M,
this
transformation, BB' uk
equation BB' uk
hi
(1 1) is
rewritten l
Uk_l.
BAB_
_-
% B';k =7k
by B'=B-' _:
1 "_
___
this
vector for
1 _"
equation the
1
and
settingVk=B'_,
we
equation
"_"
vector
A_ k
V k -F--/- k + -_E V
-- -- V k =
= B h -- -- _',--,= 0_, ,
which is equations: equivalent to the following uncoupled system of ordinary
(l 1i)
differential
The
general
solution
of this
equation
has
the
form
of solutions of the corresponding Bsk are arbitrary constants. As functions I0(}7 and Ko(_),
fundamental system, we can choose setting w'_ (r) - 10 (%r), w_k (r) = K0 (%r),
-_(117
u,t,(r) =
I its
[Ask Io(%r) + B,k Ko (%r) + z,_ (r)l + + _ To find Ask, B,,, we 234 unknowns, obtained determinant solvability solution of solve from [AMklo (aMr) + B_ukKo (at_r) + z_k (r)]. the system conditions does We that of 2M linear (2.1), (2.27, (this proved in terms _ C(_), the algebraic and (2.4). equations The the unique of a I0(_) (2) of problem problem family ( 1 2) in
of problem
expressed
functions
the
{u_ (r) } and of the family to r and z up to the third second order Q, inclusive or in the adjoining inwards,
and difference quotients and with respect to subdomains parts of the of the boundary.
152
This can be
estimates Seeing /8, that
by
applying smooth
difference permissible
analogs function
of _(r,
S.N.
Bernstein's
the boundary conditions unknown function v_-u--_, we obtain for v conditions; also
of the problem exists, and passing where u is the required solution problem the initial initial condition; boundary-value (1) with condition for homogeneous
v a boundary-value satisfies
o[:_o_-to--W!t-o, v_ we problem
will be called the modified obtain a difference-differential homogeneous boundary substitution of variables it to have been carried To ent derive the the to apply identities
difference
estimates,
it is conveni-
(13)
(14) (15)
Io,,(r) [ < K,
where K is a con_tmnt independent of /_. z. If the estimate (10") applies
(10")
to
some function Ua (r), we shall express this We thus have v_ (r)ffiO(l). We now proceed BernsteinVs estimates. First consider the
fact by the equality U_k (r)ffiO(l). with difference analogs of estimates in the parallelepiped
where To
_ is
a positive v._(r)
number in Q:_ we
the function
inequality
0<_<_
r_--,_ 2
estimate
z_(r)=(v_a):_(r)-_ c_ and easily Q,,. cs are seen Hence, some that by positive for i. the
L_za_0 Lemma
large
the boundary of Q_. Since _zz_ _ _z_--= 0, then, by Lemma 2, the maximum of z_(r) can be attained only forh={_ either for r=r_&_ or r_rs--a. But from condition (6), and also by virtue of the conditions v_a(r) = O(1), R(r, -_ _) = ---R(r:--_) _ffi0 we have z_(r)= in Q_a. 0 on these parts of the boundary of Q,a. Hence, z_(r)---- 0 (l) everywhere Therefore,
Iv',,(r) l< _
in any subdomain in Q_, Q_,, 0 _ _ _. estimates consider are obtained the function for Analogous is bounded
= o(_)
v'_(f) in Q_. To prove that _ Lv_,(r) It is
easily seen that L,, (z_)_0 in Q,_(0 _ a _ _) for sufficient cs By Lemma 1, z_, has a maximum on the boundary
c_ and other
153
hand from theequalities _ _V_k 0andfromthe conditions Theorem1 _vok _ of wehavezik(r)=O(1)inQ,a. Hence ]OzOtt]..< =O(1) O(1-----_-) R (r)
A similar consider the estimate function is obtained for in Q,_ for O<a<O.
_.v,, inQts.
To
estimate
_.vm we
zt, (r) = (Lv;k)' ' (r, z, t) + c, [(0,_k) + R _ + (_, o;_,,k) + 0, o;+lk)'+ 0, v;k-,)21+ c', _
where R(r,z,t)=(r--rx---_) x(z--) and, as before, find that T'..<z_.H--T, (H--C--0 (r, _2 (t--_), r)
O,V_k=O(1)inO_va{rl+O\<r-_r_--_,
_<t<T},
where The follows. In order Vtk for 8, T, _ are arbitrarily small positive numbers. uniform boundedness of _ o_ (r) in the entire domain is proved as The function 07vtk satisfies the equality Lh_(_iVtk)= O_fti, 2<k_N. that this equality be meaningful for k = l, we extend the definition k =1, stipulating at To(r, zl) __ dr' + 1 d_o(r, zt) + Oz % (r, zt) - (16) From 0(1). (16) and (6), we
of
__ I+o (r, zt) -- vl,_, <r) = _to (r), where have l_i..<M; Vo._x(r)=v.-l(r), OTVto(r) = Further, 0Took(r) satisfies the VM+,.--t(r)=vM.--l(r). _o(r. zt) -- v_._, (r)
"t
boundary d _ for0ivtk,
Mx = max 0! I + 1, taking sufficiently o ot I replaced everywhere by _-tvtk and the consideration, it can easily be
into
shown
OhOi, are bounded in Q,8. From equation (2.0) and from previous follows the boundedness of. 0,,-vtk, _,_V_k,_.;.Vt_ in Q,_. To estimate apply Lemma 4, substituting 0Givtk for v_. It is easily verified requirements of the 1emma are satisfied under this substitution, 0_Tvx_(r ) = O(1), for r_+_.%r_r,--_, But then, using l_<k_<N. the function z_i (r) = (01f vt_)_R' (r) + ct CO,7 vt_)_ + ctr t _i-,7va, k(r) =O(1)
154
find
= 0(1)
in Q,a.
From
equation
Qz_.
estimates
analogously
subdomains Fs for r = q.
O_/r, -_ r ..< q -5 _, 0 < _<z _ H0 -- _, 0_t_T}, v_(r), we take the function zlk(r) = (v_pR'(r,
+ c,[_+i_ -5_ -5 _-_*]-5r_, where R (r, z)= (r--z_-- _)(z--y)(Ho -- y --z),and form Bernstein's estimate. We similarly estimate _,v_ in O_ To estimate _=_a we take the function zL,(r) = (_=,,_)' &" (z) + cd_+,_ + _ + __.,! + c,(r-n)'.
Q_ follows difference
from (_..0). Estimates are thus obtained for derivatives and quotients of second order for the case of compact v_ in Q_,_. 0_.<t,_<T}it is estimated in all of Q.
In domains oftypeQ_{r,--_-_r-_r,, 0<_z_<H--y, sufficient to estimate _=v_ and v_, since _vehas been To prove the boundedness of _i, we consider
the function
z._.(r) = (_. t'l,.)"_:_(r. z) _L C. (_+1, + t_ + 4--1_) "]- C_a, where R(r. z)= (r, --_-- r)(z-- y)(H-- V-- z) on the boundary to Bernstein. estimated in regions of t}_pe r = r=using The family {o_,} should first be inside
estimated v_'_nd a
Lemma
Q=, according
4% problem
We (1).
prove the
existence estimates
and uniqueness in 3_ we see that in any subdomain subdomain obtained of the are ,-strips point compact adjoining
of the solution of o_,(r) are compact, form Q, = the rectangle also of the of the where in of the from and in
the sense of uniform = D, [0, T] , where D by removing corner D, is points. obtained an The from
_, (r), _,
F,. The families t_ v_ v_, _.;0_ are compact truly interior subdomain of D, and _>0 is Therefore, from _(r) such entering in the family vx_ (r) depending that for equation /10/, inside we Q,
in _, = _)= 1_, T], where any arbitrarily small on h and we can pick and
[h,l +[x,l-_O it and its derivatives (2.0) converge uniformly in their can and prove that the also the initial limiting and the
regions. As equation(l,0)
function homo-
geneous boundary conditions (1.5), in the classical sense. requirements I and 2 of the (1) with inhomogeneous We shah prove that requirements the of solution _ and 8_ -_- in 1 and 2, of problem Q follows Therefore, the inequality
(1.1) --( 1.4) and the modified initial condition Clearly, the function u = v + W meets definition of the solution v(r, z. t) 3 and not u of the only initial satisfies definition 3. of Boundedness /_- v_, to problem
boundar T conditions. the limiting function but (1). from also We requirements first consider
4 of the
uniform the
boundedness inclusion
v_ and
respectively. establish
to prove
it suffices
155
rl
EQ('o)=SdtydzY
0 0 rt
_ [(Or
' ) +(O_-f]
dr<+
(17)
smooth
h_ E
k=i
E J" {(rv;k)'"
i--I r,
+ r(_'Tv")@'k--r(_Tv'*)"--
by parts
terms
of this
h,
Z
k-I At
_
i-I M
(18)
once continuously boundary conditions right-hand side of for v_k and @_,
and w;_ (r) its values (18) vanishes by virtue can be written.
h_
N
_
k=l M
_
|_l rt
i'r[(v:.k)'+(_v,.)'ldr=
rt
= h,
E
k--I
E
i-I
the that
inequality
terms
on
the
right-hand after
side,
bounded, side,
rt
a sufficiently
E
4=1
_,, ;r[(v_k)'-{i--It,
independent
of in the
h and left-hand
If summation
integration
not
over Q, but over aclosed parallelepiped _<t_< T},lying inside Q, the inequality previous Ih_l+]% constant _0 and C in the right-hand that Ov and 0-7-
Q'_{r,+_<r_<r2--_, _<z<H--_, is a fortiori satisfied with the side. Passing to the limit for in Q_ and
seeing
Ov _ are continuous
(v_l)'_ we obtain
O_ ,
dr
1456
156
the
proof
v G _>
(Q).
Hence 4 in the
belongs
= 0
for the
any once
function
satisfying
De_(v,_p)
F_
(22)
where imposed
-f=[--LUt. on f and
of the integral
inclusion
v _ W_(Q) and
the
limitations
r Q
_v _
, _v --_-_--- * -I-?1 _ exists and lim D _ (v, O) = D Q (v, _L Therefore satisfying relationship the homogeneous (21) for any continuously (1.1)--(1.4) differentiable is equivalent
conditions
D Q(v, 4)) = 0, or alternatively lim/_ Designating conditions for the left-hand _),
N ;Mrs
side
v_, and
(25*)
In this
equality,
however, direct
we transition
cannot
directly limit
pass is
to the
limit for
to the
admissible
157
2/
rs
The
behavior
of the
expression q_,_) = h. _
k--I
E_.(v,k,
_
i--I
Sr Iv:, *:,-}-(_zvi.).(_.*,.)]dr
r1
(27)
at the
limit
requires
further
study.
Let
G6 be
the
boundary
domain
left
after
removing the parallelepiped Q6 from Q; we retain the same notations for the corresponding grid domains. Then EQ (v, }and E_hCRk, lk) are representable in the form
E q (V, ?P) = E Q_ (v, YP)-'[-.Lc_t(v, _), Eqh't (tJdt, dPlk) = E_ _ (vd, TPU,) Jr
+ E_a (Rk, _)" Applying and the Cauchy-Bunyakovskii we easily obtain [Cauchy-Schwarz] inequality to the
(28) sums
integrals,
Therefore,
from
(19),
(,_, 0,_),
for that for sufficiently small sufficiently small fi > 0 (29) 6 > 0 (30)
we
obtain
IEz_ (Rk, ,k) I < e. Applying (28) and (297 and (30), we obtain
Ihsl+l_sl_O.
IE_, (v_,, i,) -- E (v, P) [ < 3e. That is, lirn E_, (v_, _t) = E _ (v, P).
(32)
I hs I+ I _1-_0.
Therefore, passing to the limit in (25*) as Ih,] + Hence, relationship (21) for the function v is satisfied continuously homogeneous differentiable conditions permissible (1.1)--(1.4).
I_l
(25).
158
for
the
solution
of problem
(I)
concerning
the
function
u=v-_-W.
This
com-
pletes the proof We now prove solutions of this corresponding relation (23)
of the solution. of this solution. Let u and u be the function U=_--_ is a solution with f =--0, cp_ 0 and _ _ 0.
for any continuously differentiable permissible function satisfying (1.4). Since U belongs to the closure of the set of all these functions metric W_ (Q), U can be substituted for _ in (33), which gives Q Integrating over t and applying the initial condition U(r, z, 0) _ 0, we aU'
(1.I)-in the
(34)
obtain
L_(U, LO=;SS +r--_-_' [(_r) Q + ._ rU' (r, z, T)dD Hence, point U(r, z, T) =- O, with the possible (r_, He, T). Since the upper limit we have U (r, z, t) _ exception segment of the vertical sides [rh H_ 0 _: t_ T]. This problem (1). of the uniqueness
(_.)']dQ+
the
arbitrarily,
in
Q,
of the
solution
it follows
that
not
only the subsequence v_ (r). corresponding to the sequence hs. _,. approaching zero,converges to the solution _, but that to the solution v for any arbitrary approach of h, r to zero.
$ 2.
ESTIMATL-NG THE EHROH THE NONSTATIONARY priori estimate. derivatives _a Let and 0s,, _"
OF
FOR
1. having
u(r,z,
of problem O. Let
(1)
bounded
in the
parallelepiped
Let ray
u_ (r) method
be
the
solution
of problem
(2).
We
estimate
the
error
of
the (36)
v_, (r) : u (r, z_,t,) -- u,, (r). Applying the Taylor expansion, _u(r,z,,t,) we obtain
(37)
15g
where
Rz= TI Id'u(r"z'tk) t dau(r'_'t_)ltP2 "[0"2t "
z, z
lie
on
the
segment
[z_--h,
z_Wh],
2 Ri,
(38)
hs
t inside the
O. conaitions
(39)
vtk satisfies
(40) (41)
0-_k<N;
dz=
(42)
r_ _< r _ r=,
dv_k(rl) =0,
1,_i_<340
Ulo (r) _- O.
Applying _38)--(43),
the and
estimate using(35),
(i0) to the solution of boundary-value (37), (38), we see that everywhere rx)_] \ Msh. / 12 2 --
1o,,(r) J <--
+ [(r_-rz)2-(rlines
'.
h
If we then, faces
use
a mesh
of straight
by boundary
-_- along
the
z-axis on the
/11/,
conditions
(46) have the of derivatives estimates and known estimates Diriehlet estimates aperfect is known
disadvantage that they contain maxima of the unknown solution. Of considerable are expressed i,e., by in terms the so-called D. F. Davidenko Laplace for the H0=0 assume of the a posteriori /13/ for
of the absolute value are found estimates. the solution (1) of this
which
previously
solution of
O<:z_H,
shall
160
existence has
conditions require two application Theorem equation and let are
been proved in 1, is such satisfied also at the corner proved (1) with Nirenberg. minimum in Q. Vyborny. which at this reaches point in /14/ Ho=O. Let at some Then u _u Let its _!,_c> and
initial of Q. which
continuous
interior point P" (r'. z', t') _ Q, (r', z_, t') _- const everywhere in Q u(r, z, t)be a continuous in Q at the point face z=o, solution of
for t <e.
Theorem problem l_(r ". _.z"t') _" I Suppose constructed, R. H0=0 Then minimum
0 if P, belongs
to the
<0 if P" belongs that an interpolatory which coincides lines, is Q, satisfies (1) for estimate
to the face z= II. function uh (r,z, t) haB been somehow with the solution u,k(r)of problem (2) for continuous, the same and on its derivatives which enter equation conditions on E, as the solution 1"o+1"1 takes the value uh Ir,+r, =_*(s).
H, = 0 on the nodal (1.0) are bound in u(r,z,t) of problem Then the following
H==0, holds:
[u (r, z, t) -- % (r, z, t) l _ Ege (r, t) + %, where g,(r.O--n_n{g(r);t}, g(r)_-" 4 + P_--_ ln :L_, 4 In f_! rl
1
(47)
E- mPtt-z_l,
In particular, the auxiliary if functions _* ----_. we should
","r_: v(')-v'(')l
set eo=O in (47). Indeed. consider
V (r, z, t) ffi E (r) + _ + (u -- u,), which satisfy the following inequalities: LV= +_-IT-Lut--E _O,
it follows that minV _ Q mint r_ is attained either 0 Q, then from Nirenberg's minimum is reached for
cannot on
be
reached or
on the Q. that
r.+F,, theorem,
inside
seeing
LV _ _ invariably Therefore,
t = 0.
Thus
rain tr_ is
O
attained on F 0 + F_ where the function V is nonnegative. everywhere in Q _ _ 00 which is equivalent to the inequality lu--utl _Eg(r) + e_. (48)
Now
consider
the
auxiliary
functions
161
[u--un which together Remark nodal lines with (48) gives the If we have found from u_, (r), we
l "_ Et + "o, estimate a function may use (47). un(r,z,t) the estimate
(49)
1.
which
on the
inner
differs
lu--u_I_<mQaxlu--uhl where nodal uh(r, lines. z, t) is The the first interpolative term on the and the estimated estimates
+ maxl u n --'u_ t, Q function right-hand second using of coinciding side of with (50) is
term is known at least on the the theorem of V. S. Ryaben'kii arbitrary interpolative functions
uh in terms of difference quotients of corresponding orders of a function defined at grid points. R e m ark 2. The estimates (47), (50) have a certain advantage over Gerschgorin's maximum u(r, of the are estimates absolute expressed (45), (46): they do not values of the derivatives in terms used (2) of the require knowledge of the required found solution of the solution and of the the ray
z, t) and
previously
method, but also with other methods, e.g., the The main difficulty involved in the application estimates is the construction of the interpolative we may use etc. /11/. interpolation Hermite polynomials,
Here
polynomials,
3. In this seepage. to be such in a closed satisfies the such function the boundary Definition. that: 1) (3.0), 2) u is and satisfies u satisfies sense; is bounded F, is the section we
CASE briefly
OF apply
conditions (3.1)--(3.4) called five-fold smooth of the solution problem. of problem (3.0) inside
in the classical sense. Any permissible function satisfying -(3.4) is a function with -(3.4) u such equation
differentiable
Q, in accordance (3.1)
this equation; the boundary conditions in O and boundary continuously conditions u 6 W_ (Q); of subdomain
of problem
in the
It _ _}, satis-
= O,
162
n is the normal to 1"8, and D any once function satisfying the homogeneous
continuously boundary
differenticonditions
Irl-----O, -_-_ Jr, _ O. As in 1, and stationary analogs of Lemmas 1 and 2 on the maximum
solution
form
_-I
!!.<-'y+"
"
+
2 x$
%=
Bessel (4.3) in be
A=, B, from
are the
equations 1, _t
it_
S. N.
Bernstein's 2. (3.0)
the
&dr 1
_f
'
_f
solvable. obtain both the Gerschgorin of the by and simplest z=H, as approximation in (4.3), we reach
normtationary estimates.
seepage,
_ on the sides z-0 and & of 2 the estimate Iu (r, zi) -- u I(r) I _ 1
i(r,--
rl)* -- (r -- rl)' l X
a half-mesh-spacing
I u (r, zl) -- u_ (r) 1<: O(h'). DavidenkoVs case the a posteriori form estimate for a perfect borehole (H0=0) has in
this
_< Eg(r)
+ *,,
_-_ + ---lnrQL r$
r In--,
r_
163
proof with
of the of
these I.
in R. of general
the
case /l
follows 7, 1 8/
in
its for
theorems
Hopf
substituted
Vyborny. the case generalized were solution previously in for considered cases Aa, Ab, the in/i Ab', 9/. Ac,
and
uniqueness in a more
problem 2 Bc,
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. 2. 3. 4.
ALIKHASHKIN, the Problem of ROTHE, E. Uber --Math. Ann. TIKHONOV, in Several VENTTSEL',
Ya. I. Reshenie zadachi o nesovershennoi skvazhine metodom pryamykh(Solution of the Imperfect Borehole by the Ray Method). -- Vychi_litel' naya matematika, No. 1. 1957. Wfirmeleitungsgleichung mit nichtkonstanten Koeffizienten im r_iumlichen Falle. 104: 340-354. 1940. (On the Heat Equation
A.N. Ob uravnenii teploprovodnosti dlya neskol'kikh peremennykh Variables). --Byulleten' MGU, sektsiya AI, No. 9. 1938. T.D. Pervaya kraevaya zadacha i zadacha Koshi dlya kvazilineinogo
parabolieheskogo
uravneniya so mnogimi prostranstvennymi peremennymi ( First Boundary- Value Problem and Cauchy Problem for the Q uasilinear Parabolic Equation in Many Space Variables). -- Matematicheskii sbomik. Vol. 41, No. 4. 1957. 5. SLOBODYANSKII, M.G. a) Sposob priblizhennogo integrirovaniya uravnenli s chasmymi proizvodnymi i ego primenenie k zadacham teorii uprugosti (A Method of Approximate Integration of Partial Differential Equations and Its Application to Problems of Elasticity Theory). -- PMM, Vol. 3, No. 1939. b) Prostranstvennye zadachi teorii uprugosti dlya prizmaticheskikh tel (Three-Dimensional Problems 1940. 6. of Elasticity Theory for Prismatic Bodies). -- Uehenye zapiski MGU, No. 39 (mekhanika).
1.
FADDEEVA, V.N. Metod pryamykh v primenenii k nekotorym kraevym zadacham (Ray Method Applied to Some Boundary-Value Problems). -- Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta im. V.A. Steklova, Vol. 28. 1949. SOBOLEV, S.L. Nekotorye primeneniya funktsional'nogo analiza v matematicheskoi fizike (Some
7. 8.
Applications of Functional Analysis in Mathematical Physics). --LGU. 1950. BERNSTEIN, S.N. Ogranichenie modulei pnsledovatel'nesti proizvodnykh reshenii uravnenii parabolicheskogo tipa ( Bounds of Absolute Values of the Sequence of Derivatives of Solutions of Parabolic Equations). --DAN SSSR, Vol. 18, No. 7. 1938. KARMANOV, V.G. O sushchestvovanii reshenii nekotorykh kraevykh zadach dlya uravnenii smeshannogo tipa (On the Solvability of Some Boundary-Value Problems for Mixed Equations). -- Izvestiya AN SSSR, seriya matematieheskaya, Vol. 22, No. 1. 1958. PETROVSKII, I.G. Lektsii ob uravneniyakh s chastnymi Equations).Fizmatgiz, Moskva. 1962. BEREZIN, I.S. and N.P. ZHIDKOV. Metody vychislenii --Fizmatgiz, Moskva. 1959. proizvodnymi (Numerical (Lectures Methods), zur Lfsung on Partial Vol. partieller Differential
9.
GERSCHGORIN,S. Fehlerabseh_itzung fiir des Differenzenverfahren ungen. --ZAMM, Vol. 10, No. 4. 1930. DAVIDENKO, D.F. Thesis.--MGU. 1960. NIRENBERG, L.A. Strong Maximum Math., Vol. 6, No. 2. 1953. VYBORNY, R. O svoistvakh teshenii of Some (On Properties of Solutions Vol. 117, No. 4..1957. Principle nekotorykh for Parabolic kraevykh
Equations. zadach
--Comm.
on Pure
patabolicheskogo --DAN
Boundary-Value
Problems
Equations).
A.F.
raznosmykh
di tipo Eliitico.
-- Springer
(Berlin).
OLEINIK, O.A. O svoistvakh reshenii nekotorykh kraevykh zadach dlya uravnenii ellipticheskogo tipa (On Properties of Solutions of Some Boundary-Value Problems for Eliiptic Equations). -- Matematicheskii sbornik, Vol. 30, No. 3. 1952.
]45_
164
ellipticheskogo
tipa
(Mixed
Problem
metodom setok _aevykh zadach dlya uravnenii v cb.asmytda proizvodnykla tipa (Difference Solutions of Boundary-Valtm Problems for Second Equatiom). -- Zhurnal Vychislitl' noi Matematiki i Matematicheskoi
_s6
165
EXPLANATORY AND
LIST
OF ABBREVIATED
NAMES
PERIODICALS
APPEARING
IN THIS
Abbreviation
Full
name
Ctransliterated)
Translation
AN SSSR
Akademiya
Nauk
SSSR
"
Academy USSR
of Sciences
of the
DAN
SSSR
Doklady
Akademii
Nauk
SSSR
of
GITTL
Izdatel'
stvo
i Teoreticheskoi
LGU
Leningradskii Universitet
Gosudargtvennyi
Leningrad
State
University
MGU
Moskovskii Universitet
Gosudarstvennyi
Moscow
State
University
NII
Nauchno-Issledovatel' Institut
skii
Scientific
Research
Institute
PMM
Prikladnaya Mekhanika
Matematika
Applied
Mathematics
and
Mechanics
UMN
Uspekhi Nauk
Matematicheskikh "
Advances Sciences
in Mathematical
VTs
Vychislitel'
nyi
T sentr
Computational
Center
166