Federal Register / Vol. 67, No.
80 / Thursday, April 25, 2002 / Notices
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The Leader,
Regulatory Information Management
Group, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, publishes that notice containing
proposed information collection
requests prior to submission of these
requests to OMB. Each proposed
information collection, grouped by
office, contains the following: (1) Type
of review requested, e.g. new, revision,
extension, existing or reinstatement; (2)
Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4)
Description of the need for, and
proposed use of, the information; (5)
Respondents and frequency of
collection; and (6) Reporting and/or
Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites
public comment.
Dated: April 19, 2002.
John D. Tressler,
Leader, Regulatory Information Management,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Office of Vocational and Adult
Education
Type of Review: Revision.
Title: Community Technology Centers
Program Grant Notice Inviting Project
Applications for One-Year Awards for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2002.
Frequency: Semi-Annually.
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs; Not-for-profit
institutions; Businesses or other for-
profit.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden: Responses: 1,000;
Burden Hours: 40.
Abstract: Community Technology
Centers Grant Notice and application
materials for competitive grant awards
to eligible applicants with an absolute
priority on providing adult education
and family literacy project activities
through technology and the Internet,
including general education
development, language instruction
educational programs, and adult basic
education classes or programs.
This information collection is being
submitted under the Streamlined
Clearance Process for Discretionary
Grant Information Collections (1890–
0001). Therefore, the 30-day public
comment period notice will be the only
public comment notice published for
this information collection.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, or
VerDate Apr<19>2002 13:31 Apr 24, 2002 Jkt 197001
20499
should be addressed to Vivian Reese,
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW, Room 4050, Regional
Office Building 3, Washington, DC
20202–4651. Requests may also be
electronically mailed to the internet
address OCIO_IMG_Issues@ed.gov or
faxed to 202–708–9346. Please specify
the complete title of the information
collection when making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or the
collection activity requirements should
be directed to Sheila Caery at (202) 708–
6287 or via her internet address
Sheila.Carey@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. 02–10119 Filed 4–24–02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA No. 84.184L]
Office of Elementary and Secondary
Education; Safe Schools/Healthy
Students Initiative; Notice Inviting
Applications for New Awards in Fiscal
Year (FY) 2002
Purpose: Under this program, the
Departments of Education (ED), Health
and Human Services (HHS), and Justice
(DOJ) will support the implementation
and enhancement of comprehensive
community-wide strategies for creating
safe and drug-free schools and
promoting healthy childhood
development.
For FY 2002 the competition focuses
on projects designed to meet the priority
we describe in the PRIORITIES setion of
this notice.
Eligible Applicants: Local educational
agencies (LEAs) or consortia of LEAs.
LEAs that have received a grant under
this initiative in FYs 1999, 2000, or
2001, or have received services under
this initiative as part of a grant to a
consortium of LEAs in those years, may
not apply for funding in FY 2002.
Applications Available: April 25,
2002.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: June 21, 2002.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: August 20, 2002.
Estimated Available Funds:
$79,000,000.
Estimated Range of Awards: Up to $1
million per year for LEAs or consortia
in rural areas and tribal school districts;
up to $2,000,000 per year for LEAs or
consortia in suburban areas; up to
$3,000,000 per year for LEAs or
consortia in urban areas.
PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$2,000,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 40.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months.
Page Limit: The program narrative
section of applications submitted under
this competition may not exceed 30
pages in length. Each page must:
—Be 8.5″ x 11″.
—Be doubled spaced (no more than
three lines per vertical inch).
—Have margins of one inch on the top,
bottom and sides.
—Contain type on only one side.
—Use a type font that is either 12-point
or larger or not smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
Our reviewers will not read any pages
of your application that exceed the page
limit if you apply these standards, or
that exceed the equivalent of the page
limit if you apply other standards.
These requirements are designed to
prevent an applicant from gaining an
unfair competitive advantage by
providing a more extensive discussion
than the requirements permit and to
facilitate evaluation of applications by
peer reviewers by ensuring that
applications are readable.
Additional information about the
structure and organization of the grant
proposal is included in the application
package for the program.
Applicable Program Regulations: The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR
parts 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 85, 98, and
99.
Priority: This competition focuses on
projects designed to meet a program
priority established in this notice.
Implementing and Enhancing
Comprehensive Community-Wide
Strategies for Creating Safe and Drug-
Free Schools and Promoting Healthy
Childhood Development
Applicants proposing a project under
this priority must demonstrate how the
funds they are requesting support or
enhance a comprehensive, integrated
strategy for an entire school district (or
entire school districts in the case of a
consortium) that is designed to create
safe and drug-free schools and promote
healthy childhood development. The
applicant must propose evidence-based
approaches and include, at a minimum,
the following six elements: (1) Safe
school environment; (2) alcohol and
other drugs and violence prevention and
early intervention; (3) school and
community mental health preventive
and treatment intervention programs; (4)
early childhood psychosocial and
pfrm13 PsN: 25APN1
 20500 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2002 / Notices
emotional development services; (5)
educational reform; and (6) safe school
policies. In circumstances where
implementation of the strategy for an
entire school district is not possible,
applicants must provide a full
explanation of how the chosen schools
will receive services under all six
elements of the plan and why district-
wide implementation is not feasible or
appropriate.
Under element 1, no more than 10
percent of funds proposed for that
element may be used to support costs
associated with (1) security equipment
and personnel, and (2) minor
remodeling of school facilities to
improve school safety.
For FY 2002 this priority is an
absolute priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3); Safe and Drug-Free Schools
and Communities Act (20 U.S.C. 7131);
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
290aa); Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention Act (42 U.S.C.
5614(b)(4)(e) and 5781 et seq.); the
Departments of Labor, Health and
Human Services, and Education and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
2002, January 10, 2002, P.L. 107–116,
115 Stat. 2177; and the Departments of
Commerce, Justice, and State
Appropriations Act, 2002, November 28,
2001, P.L. 107–77, 115 Stat. 748, we
consider only applications that meet the
priority.
Other Requirements
We will award approximately 40
grants in FY 2002 to LEAs. To be
eligible for funding, applicants must:
(a) Develop and submit a Safe
Schools/Healthy Students (SS/
HS)application that addresses the
following six elements: (1) Safe school
environment, (2) alcohol and other
drugs and violence prevention and early
intervention programs, (3) school and
community mental health preventive
and treatment intervention services, (4)
early childhood psychosocial and
emotional development services, (5)
educational reform, and (6) safe school
policies.
The SS/HS application must show
evidence of a partnership comprising
the LEA, local public mental health
authority, and local law enforcement
agency. Applicants are strongly
encouraged also to include other entities
in the partnership. For example,
community- and faith-based
organizations, juvenile justice and
family court officials, and family
members, teachers, and students could
all play important roles in developing
and implementing the initiative.
(b) Include two formal written
agreements. The first must describe the
VerDate Apr<19>2002 13:31 Apr 24, 2002 Jkt 197001
goals and objectives of the partnership
and include a delineation of the roles
and responsibilities of each partner.
This agreement must contain the
signatures of the school superintendent,
the head of the local public mental
health authority, and the chief law
enforcement executive. If a consortium
of LEAs is applying for funds, the
superintendent of each participating
LEA must sign this agreement.
The second written agreement must
contain the signatures of the school
superintendent and the head of the local
public mental health authority. This
agreement must describe the procedures
to be used for referral, treatment, and
follow-up for children and adolescents
with serious mental health problems.
For this purpose, the local public
mental health authority is the legally
constituted entity closest to the
community level that, directly or
through contract with the State mental
health authority, provides
administrative control or oversight of
mental health services delivery within
the community. If a consortium of LEAs
is applying for funds, the
superintendent of each participating
LEA must sign this agreement.
(c) Include an assurance in their
application that they are enforcing the
requirements in the Federal Gun-Free
Schools Act (regarding possession of
firearms at school and reporting of
firearms offenses to appropriate law
enforcement officials) and the Pro-
Children Act (regarding tobacco use in
facilities used to provide educational
services).
(d) Develop and submit performance
indicators for the grant. Performance
indicators must link to proposed goals
and objectives for the grant, include
baseline data (if available), levels of
performance for each indicator,
timeframes for achieving levels of
performance for each indicator, and
source of data for measuring progress on
each indicator. Applicants must select
at least one performance indicator for
each of the six required program
elements. We intend that grantees use
these indicators as a tool to assist in the
management of the grant and to focus
attention on progress being made by the
grantee.
Examples of indicators for the
elements include:
Safe School Environment
—rates of school crime.
—student perceptions of the school
environment as safe.
PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
Alcohol and Other Drugs, Violence
Prevention, and Early Intervention
—prevalence of alcohol and other drug
use by students.
—rates of fighting, interpersonal injury,
weapon carrying, and gang-related
crime in schools.
School and Community Mental Health
Preventive and Treatment Intervention
Programs
—incidence and prevalence of mental
disorders among students (e.g.,
conduct and related problems,
depression, anxiety disorders).
—presence of screening, assessment,
and referral mechanisms for mental
disorders in the school setting.
Early Childhood Psychosocial and
Emotional Development Services
—incidence of adverse mental health
outcomes (e.g., conduct problems and
other antisocial behaviors, depression,
and anxiety disorders) among young
children.
—number and types of services for early
childhood psychosocial and
emotional development.
Educational Reform
—measures of interaction and
coordination between academic staff,
student support staff, and school
security staff.
—use of interventions that teach
positive behavior as a supplement or
an alternative to other disciplinary
approaches.
—measures of academic achievement
for students.
Safe Schools Policies
—presence and enforcement of
discipline codes and penalties/
sanctions for infractions.
—awareness of established policies.
—penalties/sanctions for infractions
that emphasize continuing
connections to school.
—policies that establish zero-tolerance
for drugs and weapons on school
premises.
(e) Provide a local plan for evaluating
the community-wide strategy and agree
to set aside at least 7 percent of the
project budget to fund this local
evaluation.
(f) Select evidence-based programs
and activities for implementation as part
of the SS/HS Initiative. The application
must include a rationale for the
selection of programs and activities that
will be implemented by the applicant.
This rationale should include
information about the research base that
supports selected programs and
activities, as well as a discussion about
pfrm13 PsN: 25APN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2002 / Notices
why the selected programs or activities
are appropriate for the target population
and meet needs identified in the needs
assessment process. Information about
the research base for programs or
activities may reference either specific
program evaluations or accepted theory
from youth development or human
development research.
Determining Urbanicity
The maximum amount of funds that
an applicant is eligible to receive is
based on the applicant’s urbanicity.
Urban districts may receive grants of up
to $3,000,000 per year. Suburban
districts may receive grants of up to
$2,000,000 per year. Rural districts
(including tribal school districts) may
receive grants of up to $1,000,000 per
year.
Grants will not be awarded for
amounts that exceed these established
caps. Applicants should ensure that
their budget requests do not exceed the
caps.
In order to determine its urbanicity,
an LEA must use the National Public
School and School District Locator to
find the locale code for the district. The
Locator is available online at: http://
nces.ed.gov/ccdweb/school/index.asp.
For the purposes of this competition,
the following categories of urbanicity
apply:
Rural sites—(1) Large town [an
incorporated place or a Census-
designated place (CDP) with a
population of at least 25,000 and located
outside a consolidated metropolitan
statistical area (CMSA) or metropolitan
statistical area (MSA)]; (2) small town
[an incorporated place or CDP with a
population between 2,500 and 24,999
and located outside a CMSA or MSA];
or (3) any incorporated place, CDP, or
non-place territory designated as rural
by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.
Suburban sites—(1) Urban fringe of a
large city [any incorporated place, CDP,
or non-place territory within a CMSA or
MSA of a large city and defined as
urban by the U.S. Bureau of Census; or
(2) urban fringe of a midsize city [any
incorporated place, CDP, or non-place
within a CMSA or MSA of a midsize
central city and defined as urban by the
U.S. Bureau of the Census].
Urban sites—(1) Large city [a central
city of a MSA or CMSA with a
population of at least 250,000] or (2)
midsize city [central city of an MSA or
CMSA with a population of less than
250,000].
Participation by Private School
Students and Teachers
LEAs that receive a SS/HS grant are
required to provide for the equitable
VerDate Apr<19>2002 13:31 Apr 24, 2002 Jkt 197001
participation of eligible private school
children and their teachers or other
educational personnel. In order to
ensure that grant program activities
address the needs of private school
children, timely and meaningful
consultation with appropriate private
school officials must occur during the
design and development of the program.
Administrative direction and control
over grant funds must remain with the
grantee.
Maintenance of Effort
An LEA may receive a SS/HS grant
only if the State educational agency
(SEA) finds that the combined fiscal
effort per student or the aggregate
expenditures of the agency and the State
with respect to the provisions of free
public education by the agency for the
preceding fiscal year was not less than
90 percent of the combined fiscal effort
or aggregate expenditures for the second
preceding fiscal year.
Equitable Distribution
In making awards under this grant
program, we may (1) take into
consideration the geographic
distribution and diversity of activities
addressed by the projects, in addition to
the rank order of applicants, and (2) in
accordance with § 75.217(d) of the
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations, ensure
equitable distribution of grants under
this program among urban, suburban,
and rural LEAs.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds, we may make additional awards
in FY 2003 from the rank-ordered list of
unfunded applicants from this
competition.
Definitions
For the purpose of this competition,
the definition of the term ‘‘local
educational agency’’ is the definition at
section 9101(26) of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965
(ESEA), as amended:
(a) General. In general, the term ‘‘local
educational agency’’ means a public
board of education or other public
authority legally constituted within a
State for either administrative control or
direction of, or to perform a service
function for public elementary or
secondary schools in a city, county,
township, school district, or other
political subdivision of a State, or of or
for a combination of school districts or
counties that is recognized in a State as
an administrative agency for its public
elementary schools or secondary
schools.
(b) Administrative control and
direction. The term includes any other
PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
20501
public institution or agency having
administrative control or direction of a
public elementary or secondary school.
(c) BIA Schools. The term includes an
elementary school or secondary school
funded by the Bureau of Indian Affairs
but only to the extent that including the
school makes the school eligible for
programs for which specific eligiblity is
not provided to the school in another
provision of law and the school does not
have a student population that is
smaller than the student population of
the LEA receiving assistance under the
ESEA with the smallest student
population, except that the school shall
not be subject to the jurisdiction of any
SEA other than the Bureau of Indian
Affairs.
(d) Educational service agencies. The
term includes educational service
agencies and consortia of these agencies.
(e) State educational agency. The
term includes the SEA in a State in
which the SEA is the sole educational
agency for all public schools.
Selection Criteria
We use the following selection criteria
to evaluate applications for new grants
under this competition. The maximum
total score for all of these criteria is 100
points.
The maximum score for each criterion
or factor under that criterion is
indicated in parentheses.
(a) Problems to be addressed (15
points).
In assessing the extent to which the
application is based on a clear and
accurate statement of the significant
problems faced by the target
community, the following factors are
considered:
(1) The magnitude or severity of the
problem(s) to be addressed by the
proposed strategy;
(2) The extent to which existing gaps
in services, infrastructure and resources
exist, and the magnitude of those gaps
and weaknesses;
(3) Evidence of community risk
factors that may contribute to youth
violence, drug use, and deliquency; and
(4) The extent to which the problem
statement includes an assessment of the
community resources available for
children and adolescents.
(b) Goals and objectives (10 points).
In assessing the goals and objectives
of the proposed application, the
following factors are considered:
(1) The extent to which the goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the proposed project are clearly
specified and measurable; and
(2) The extent to which the objectives
identified are related to measurable
action steps needed to achieve the
goal(s).
pfrm13 PsN: 25APN1
 20502 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2002 / Notices
(c) Design of proposed strategy (30
points).
In assessing the design of the
proposed strategy, the following factors
are considered:
(1) The extent to which the proposed
strategy represents a comprehensive,
integrated approach that addresses the
six elements of the SS/HS Initiative;
(2) The extent to which the
intervention is appropriate for the age
and developmental levels, gender, and
ethnic and cultural diversity of the
target population, and demonstrates the
ability to engage and respond to the
needs of identified ethnic and racial
minority populations;
(3) The extent to which the
application clearly describes the
programs, activities, and services that
comprise the proposed strategy, and
details how they will be implemented;
(4) The extent to which the proposed
programs and activities are evidence
based;
(5) The extent to which the proposed
strategy will be coordinated with similar
or related efforts and will establish
linkages with other appropriate agencies
and organizations providing services to
the target population;
(6) The likelihood that the proposed
project will result in system change or
improvement; and
(7) The potential for continued
support of the strategy after Federal
funding ends, including, as appropriate,
the demonstrated commitment of
appropriate entities to such support.
(d) Evaluation plan (15 points).
In determining the quality of the
evaluation plan, the following factors
will be considered:
(1) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation provide for examining the
effectiveness of project implementation
strategies.
(2) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation will provide performance
feedback and permit periodic
assessment of progress toward achieving
intended outcomes.
(3) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and
appropriate to the goals, objectives, and
outcomes of the proposed project; and
(4) The adequacy of the identified
performance measures to demonstrate
whether and to what extent the
proposed strategy is meeting its short-
term, intermediate, and long-term
objectives.
(e) Management and organizational
capability (20 points).
In determining the quality of
management and organizational
capability, the following factors are
considered:
(1) The relevance and demonstrated
commitment of each partner in the
VerDate Apr<19>2002 13:31 Apr 24, 2002 Jkt 197001
proposed strategy (as demonstrated in
the written agreements) to the
implementation and success of the
strategy, and how they will participate
in the proposed project;
(2) The adequacy of the management
plan to achieve the objectives of the
proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks;
(3) The adequacy of procedures for
communicating and sharing information
among all partners to ensure feedback
and continuous improvement in the
operation of the proposed
comprehensive plan;
(4) The skills, experience, time
commitments, and educational
requirements of key staff and their
relevance to the objectives of the
proposed comprehensive plan; and
(5) The extent to which staff
qualifications and training represent
diverse and relevant experience in
engaging and providing services to
underserved, underrepresented, and
diverse racial and ethnic groups.
(f) Budget (10 points).
In determining the quality of the
budget, the following factors will be
considered:
(1) The extent to which the costs are
reasonable in relation to the number of
students to be served and to the
anticipated benefits and results;
(2) The extent to which fiscal control
and accounting procedures will ensure
prudent use, proper and timely
disbursement, and accurate accounting
of funds received under the grant.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
It is the Secretary’s practice, in
accordance with the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553), to offer
interested parties the opportunity to
comment on proposed rules. Section
437(d)(1) of the General Education
Provisions Act (GEPA), however,
exempts from this requirement rules
that apply to the first competition under
a new or substantially revised program.
This is the first competition for the SS/
HS Initiative under the reauthorized
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965, as amended by the No
Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
FOR INFORMATION AND APPLICATIONS
CONTACT: For information contact Kellie
Dressler Tetrick, SS/HS Program
Coordinator, Office of Juvenile Justice
and Delinquency Prevention, US
Department of Justice, 810 7th Street,
NW, Washington, DC 20531. Telephone:
(202) 514–4817 or via Internet:
dresslek@ojp.usdoj.gov.
PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
If you use a telecommunication
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–888–877–8339.
Detailed information regarding the
SS/HS Initiative is also available at the
following sites on the Internet:
http://www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/SDFS
http://www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org
http://www.samhsa.gov
The application package is available
on these three Web sites at the addresses
indicated above. For printed
applications contact: Education
Publication Center (ED Pubs), P.O. Box
1398, Jessup, MD 20794–1398.
Telephone (toll free): 1–877–433–7827.
FAX: (301) 470–1244. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), you may call (toll free): 1–877–
576–7734 or via Internet:
edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g. Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR APPLICATIONS AND
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Individuals with disabilities also may
obtain a copy of the application package
in an alternative format by contacting
that person. However, the Department is
not able to reproduce in an alternative
format the standard forms included in
the application package.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: www.ed.gov/
legislation/FedRegister.
To use PDF you must have the Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll-free, at (888)
293–6498; or in the Washington, DC
area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/
index.html.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131; 42
U.S.C. 290aa; 42 U.S.C. 5614(b)(4)(e) and
5781 et seq.; the Departments of Labor,
Health and Human Services, and Education
and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
2002, January 10, 2002, Pub. L. 107–116, 115
Stat. 2177; the Departments of Commerce,
State, and Justice Appropriations Act, 2002,
November 28, 2001, Pub. L. 107–77, 115 Stat.
748.
pfrm13 PsN: 25APN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 80 / Thursday, April 25, 2002 / Notices 20503

Dated: April 22, 2002. 8 a.m.–Noon DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Susan B. Neuman, —Strategic Planning for Each
Assistant Secretary, Office of Elementary and National Nuclear Security
Committee (Members Will Break
Secondary Education. Administration; National Nuclear
Into Respective Committees)
[FR Doc. 02–10173 Filed 4–24–02; 8:45 am] Security Administration Advisory
—Full Board Discussion on NNMCAB Committee
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
Priorities
—Discussion Regarding Internal AGENCY: National Nuclear Security
Management, i.e. Bylaws, Administration, Department of Energy.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Committees, Board Meetings, ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.
Environmental Management Site- Budget
Specific Advisory Board, Northern New SUMMARY: This notice announces a
12–1 p.m. Lunch in the Hopi Dining
Mexico meeting of the National Nuclear
Room
Security Administration Advisory
AGENCY: Department of Energy. 1 p.m.–2 p.m. Retreat Wrap-Up Committee (NNSA AC). The Federal
ACTION: Notice of open meeting. Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.
This agenda is subject to change at
least one day in advance of the meeting. 2 10(a)(2) requires that public notice of
SUMMARY: This notice announces a
these meetings be announced in the
meeting of the Environmental Public Participation: The meeting is Federal Register.
Management Site-Specific Advisory open to the public. Written statements
Board (EM SSAB), Northern New may be filed with the Committee either DATES: Tuesday, May 14, 2002—1300–
Mexico. The Federal Advisory before or after the meeting. Individuals 1700; Wednesday, May 15 and
Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92–463, 86 Thursday, May 16, 2002—0900–1700.
who wish to make oral statements
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of pertaining to agenda items should ADDRESSES: Science Applications
these meetings be announced in the International Corporation (SAIC), 1710
contact Menice Manzanares at the
Federal Register. SAIC Drive (formerly Goodridge Drive),
address or telephone number listed
DATES: Wednesday, Friday, May 31— McLean, VA.
above. Requests must be received five
Saturday, June 1, 2002. days prior to the meeting and reasonable FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ADDRESSES: Kachina Lodge, 413 North provision will be made to include the Betty (BJ) Morris, (202–586–6312)
Pueblo Road, Taos, New Mexico. presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Executive Officer, NNSA AC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Designated Federal Officer is
Menice Manzanares, Northern New SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
empowered to conduct the meeting in a
Mexico Citizens’ Advisory Board fashion that will facilitate the orderly Purpose of the Committee: To provide
(NNMCAB), 1660 Old Pecos Trail, Suite the Administrator for Nuclear Security
conduct of business. Each individual
B, Santa Fe, NM 87505. Phone (505) with advice and recommendations on
wishing to make public comment will
995–0393; fax (505) 989–1752 or e-mail: matters of technology, policy, and
be provided a maximum of five minutes
mmanzanares@doeal.gov. operations that lie within the mission
to present their comments at the and responsibilities of the National
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: beginning of the meeting.
Purpose of the Board: The purpose of Nuclear Security Administration.
the Board is to make recommendations Minutes: Minutes of this meeting will Additional information about the
to DOE and its regulators in the areas of be available for public review and Committee, including its charter,
environmental restoration, waste copying at the Freedom of Information members, and charge, is available at:
management, and related activities. Public Reading Room, 1E–190, Forrestal www.nnsa.gov.
Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, Purpose of the Meeting: To discuss
Tentative Board Meeting and Retreat SW., Washington, DC 20585 between 9 national security research, development,
Agenda a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday–Friday, except and policy programs.
Friday, May 31, 2002. Federal holidays. Minutes will also be Closed Meeting: In the interest of
10 a.m.–Noon available at the Public Reading Room national security, the meeting will be
—NNMCAB Board Business Meeting located at the Board’s office at 1660 Old closed to the public, pursuant to the
—Navajo Living Room Pecos Trail, Suite B, Santa Fe, NM. Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5
—Staff and Committee Reports Hours of operation for the Public U.S.C. App 2 10(d), and the Federal
—Recommendations Reading Room are 9 a.m.–4 p.m. on Advisory Committee Management
12–1 p.m. Lunch in the Hopi Dining Monday through Friday. Minutes will Regulation, 41 CFR 102–3.155, ‘‘How
Room also be made available by writing or are advisory committee meetings closed
1–4 p.m. calling Menice Manzanares at the to the public?’’, which incorporate by
—What Has Been Accomplished This Board’s office address or telephone reference the Government in the
Year? Presented by Committee number listed above. Minutes and other Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b, which, at
Chairs, Los Alamos National Board documents are on the Internet at: §§ 552b (c)(1) and (c)(3) permits closure
Laboratory (LANL), and New http:www.nnmcab.org. of meetings where restricted data or
Mexico Environment Department other classified matters are discussed.
(NMED) Issued at Washington, DC, on April 22,
Minutes: Minutes of the meeting will
—Prioritizing No Further Action 2002.
be recorded and classified accordingly.
Recommendations Rachel M. Samuel,
Issued at Washington, DC, April 22, 2002.
Dinner on Your Own Deputy Advisory Committee Management
Officer. Rachel M. Samuel,
Saturday, June 1, 2002 Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 02–10161 Filed 4–24–02; 8:45 am]
7 a.m. Breakfast in the Hopi Dining [FR Doc. 02–10162 Filed 4–24–02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6405–01–P
Room BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

VerDate Apr<19>2002 13:31 Apr 24, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM pfrm13 PsN: 25APN1