God said, "I Made a Man As per Genesis, God created man in his own image, with excellent

knowledge; authority over the entire things He created; and showing mans superior glory and dignity to the rest of the creatures, but in return man ruined and killed most of His creation. Man sometimes showed hostility towards God, that man question God even for just small things. Man evolved into a being that seeks greater knowledge not only of the universe but also about his Creator and man conceals his nature thru his noble quest for wisdom.,

In Biblical beliefs, we are made by God with his own image. God is so powerful and genius to have that kind of idea. He made us to be a care taker of his creatures, but what we have done is to destroy it. Time will come that man would realize all the mistakes that we have done to our God, when that time comes we must always remember that we should be thankful for everything and ask for forgiveness for all our mistakes

PER STANZA God (in third person point of view) begins speaking here directly to someone or something (not explained yet) and he simply speaks a general "fact" that he created mankind out of clay, perhaps an ode to Greek myth and/or perhaps referring to a common conception of mankind being "molded" by a heigher deity But so bright he, he spun Himself to brightest Day Till he was all shining gold, and oh, He was handsome to behold! these lines continue with the molding imagery as its subject, but relay its meaning to a simple compliment to our mankind/his creation..we were able to be ordinary beings made from clay to wonderful ("handsome") creatures But in his hands held he a bow Aimed at me who created him. God's creation is turning hostile towards him (i.e. Frankenstein and his monster) And I said, "Wouldst murder me Who am thy Fountainhead!" God (in first person now) is questioning why his creation would turn against him, him

being a fountainhead (mankind's source-see source note below)

Then spoke he the man of gold: "I will not Murder thee! I do but measure thee. Hold thy peace.' mankinds rebuttal to a confused God, basically states mankind will not act against God, but God will be under a watchful eye (measure thee) and demands God to be peaceful with his new creation And this I did. God agrees to mankind's terms in first person but is curious who this "regal head" (kingly like leader) is in front of him because it is clearly not his original creation and he demands an answer from mankind ('Give thy name!') 'Sir! Genius.' mankind, God's creation, responds that this "regal head" is actually "genius" which could be viewed as the personification of Genius as an evolved form of human being wary of God's power

In Biblical beliefs, we are made by God with his own image. God is so powerful and genius to have that kind of idea. He made us to be a care taker of his creatures, but what we have done is to destroy it. Time will come that man would realize all the mistakes that we have done to our God, when that time comes we must always remember that we should be thankful for everything and ask for forgiveness for all our mistakes

My literature professor said that this is simply about sunsets. A vivid description of sunsets with the eccentric and peculiar use of colors and hues. The yellow sun turns into some sort of

"pinkish-blue" when it is about to set, parang pink yung top color nung araw, tapos blue sa ilalim. And or, sometimes, the setting pink sun dominates and overshadows the blue sky, total pink illumination of the blue canvass. But I think it's more than just sunsets, I think it's more of a sexuality and sensuality issue. The pink represents women, while blue represents men. The monk represents the sexual abuser while the raisin represents the sexually abused. Kasi diba kapag nakakita ka ng pasas, parang kawawa, kulubot, walang dating, parang kinawawa talaga. And then, the monks were used for the abusers because they are barred from any sexual activities, kaya sila yung parating may tendencies na mang-abuso. Kaya ang daming bakla na pari e. The word eat on the other hand wasn't used literally, it was another word for abusing or using our bodies as sexual toys. But I guess you all know that already. It talks about the distressing change in our society. Today, women also eat the men, they have sex with men to quench their longing for sex, women dont consider sex as a sacred thing anymore. Some women nowadays, treat men like toys, like the Barbies they used to play with and throw out after theyre tired of it. It talks about the continuing sexual abusing of the men, they still eat women and use them as food for their sex-and-flesh-hungry mouths. It shows that theres no change how some people treat each other, men still eat women and women still eat men.