J.A. Negrao a,b,* , P.G. Marnet b , J. Labussiere b a USP/FZEA, CNPq, FAPESP, Cx. P. 23, 13630-970 Pirassununga/SP, Brazil b Equipe Associee INRA/ENSAR de Recherches sur la Traite, 65, rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France Accepted 27 June 2000 Abstract The experiment was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of milking stimulus on oxytocin release and to compare the effect of milking frequency on plasma levels of oxytocin and milk parameters. Twelve Lacaune ewes were subjected to six treatments (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T7 daily milkings) during 6 days. At each milking, blood was sampled and plasma oxytocin levels were determined by enzyme immunoassay. Baseline levels of oxytocin were similar for all milking frequencies. The start of milking was followed by a signicant increase in oxytocin levels for all milking frequencies. One daily milking induced signicantly higher oxytocin levels than 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 daily milkings. Milk yield was signicantly increased between 4 (1787X0 141X5 ml) and 7 (1780X0 53X6 ml) daily milkings compared to 1 (1104X0 81X2 ml) daily milking. Total concentration of milk protein did not change, but the total milk fat yield for 5 (73X0 2X0 gal) and 7 (72X8 1X4 gal) daily milkings were signicantly higher than for 1 (58X1 4X3 gal) daily milking. This study conrmed milk yield gains caused by frequent milk ejection and also showed that oxytocin release was not a limiting factor for milk yield gain when daily milking frequency was increased. # 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Milking frequency; Oxytocin; Ewes; Milk yield; Dairy ewes 1. Introduction The effect of the number of the daily milkings depends on the cisternal compartment size of the ruminant udder (Bruckmaier et al., 1994a; Knight and Dewhurst, 1994). It is well established that between milkings, there is an accumulation of milk in the udder. This causes an intramammary pressure increase and milk synthesis decreases (Labussiere, 1988). Previous study demonstrated that animals with large cistern size tolerate once daily milking, but do not respond well to higher milking frequency (Labus- siere, 1988). Recently, a study showed that the accu- mulation of a protein (FIL: feedback inhibitor of lactation) synthesized by the mammary gland, reduced milk synthesis in the alveolar cells (Knight et al., 1996). Removing these physical and chemical inhi- bitors during milk ejection, could explain the favor- able effect on milk secretion frequency. A complete milk ejection depends on the release of neurohypophyseal oxytocin during milking (Schams et al., 1984; Gorewit et al., 1992; Bruckmaier et al., 1994b). Some authors observed that small quantities Small Ruminant Research 39 (2001) 181187 * Corresponding author. Present address: USP/FZEA, CNPq, FAPESP, Cx. P. 23, 13630-970 Pirassununga/SP, Brazil. Tel.: 55-19-561-6122; fax: 55-19-561-8606. E-mail address: jnegrao@usp.br (J.A. Negrao). 0921-4488/01/$ see front matter # 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0 9 2 1 - 4 4 8 8 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 1 8 6 - 3 of oxytocin released during milking resulted in incom- plete milk ejection (Denamur and Martinet, 1961; Carruthers et al., 1993; Bruckmaier et al., 1994a,b). Other authors demonstrated that the exogenous administration of oxytocin can increase milk yield and decrease the milk yield loss during incomplete milkings (Gorewit and Sagi, 1983; Carruthers et al., 1993) or disturbed milk removal (Bruckmaier et al., 1994b). However, these studies used two daily milkings, and collected blood samples only during one of the milk- ings. For these reasons, the present study was under- taken to determine if oxytocin could be a limiting factor on milk yield when increased milking fre- quency is practised. 2. Materials and methods Twelve multiparous Lacaune ewes (from 3 to 5 lactations) between 60 and 65 days postpartum were used for this experiment. At the beginning of the experiment, the ewes were milked twice per day, and milk yield measured was 1636X6 103X0 ml. Experimental ewes were in loose housing and fed according to production level (INRA, 1990). The ewes were weighted in the rst and last experimental day. The effect of the number of daily mechanical milkings was studied using a 6 6 Latin Square experimental design (Table 1). Twelve homogeneous Lacaune ewes were distributed into six groups and subjected to six treatments (T): 1, 2 (control), 3, 4, 5 and 7 milkings per day, for 6 days (Table 2). The settings for the lowline milking machine (Alfa- Laval, VP 77) were vacuum of 44 kPa, pulsation ratio of 50% and pulsation rate of 120 c/min. Silicon liners (n10000080, Alfa-Laval) and plastic clusters (n9610361, Alfa-Laval) were used. The teat cups were attached at time 0 (without cleaning or massaging the teats and udder) and detached after 90 s. Hand-milk- ing and stripping were not applied. Milk yield, and milk composition were evaluated at each milking. Milk protein and milk fat were determined by infra- red Milkoscan 605 (Foss Electric). At 72 h before the beginning of the experiment, a silicon catheter (Nutricath, Vigon) was implanted into the jugular vein. At each milking a blood sample was taken 30 s before milking (baseline levels) and 30, 60 and 120 s after the starting of milking. These samples were collected in chilled heparinized tubes and imme- diately centrifuged at 48C and 3000g for 15 min. Plasma was preserved at 208C for later determina- tion of oxytocin by enzyme immunoassay (Marnet et al., 1994). The milk ow was monitored and recorded as previously described by Labussiere and Martinet (1964), the milk kinetics were monitored on the second and fourth experimental days. The SAS software (SAS, 1990) was used for sta- tistical evaluation of the data by analysis of variance Table 1 Experimental design for oxytocin study: daily milking frequency and treatments (milking time) Daily milking frequency Treatments (T) Time of the day (h) 1 T1 15 2 T2 5, 17 3 T3 7, 15, 23 4 T4 5, 11, 17, 23 5 T5 5, 10, 15, 20, 24 7 T7 5, 8, 11, 14, 18, 21, 24 Table 2 Organization of the Latin Square: ewes, groups and experimental days Ewes Groups (G) Experimental days First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth 1, 2 G1 T4 T5 T2 T1 T3 T7 3, 4 G2 T1 T3 T4 T2 T7 T5 5, 6 G3 T5 T1 T7 T3 T2 T4 7, 8 G4 T2 T7 T1 T4 T5 T3 9, 10 G5 T7 T4 T3 T5 T1 T2 11, 12 G6 T3 T2 T5 T7 T4 T1 182 J.A. Negrao et al. / Small Ruminant Research 39 (2001) 181187 and correlation. Mean comparisons were performed using the Student t-test and the NewmanKeuls test at a probability level of 5% (P ` 0X05). The independent variables were: ewes, treatment and period. 3. Results Results of oxytocin release are shown in Figs. 13. The baseline data of oxytocin levels (30 s before milking) were similar for all milking frequencies. The milking machine caused signicant increase in oxytocin levels for all milking frequencies at 30 s after the beginning. The milk ow stopped at 60 20 s after the start of milking, however, at 120 s the oxy- tocin levels were still higher than the baseline levels (time, 30 s). The milking time did not signicantly inuence oxytocin release (Fig. 4). However, the mean oxytocin release for T1 was signicantly higher than oxytocin release for the other treatments. For the treatments with more than one milking, the prior oxytocin release did not affect the following release. Since each milk- ing caused an oxytocin release, the total secretion of this hormone per treatment increased with the milking frequency (Table 3). Fig. 1. Average (means SEM) released oxytocin (pg/ml) during 1 (T1), 2 (T2) and 3 (T3) daily milkings. Fig. 2. Average (means SEM) released oxytocin (pg/ml) during 4 (T4) and 5 (T5) daily milkings. J.A. Negrao et al. / Small Ruminant Research 39 (2001) 181187 183 The milk yield, protein and fat for each treatment, are shown in Table 3. The increase in milking fre- quency signicantly increased total milk production and milk fat, but did not affect milk protein. For treatments 3 (1755X0 116X7 ml), 4 (1787X0 141X5 ml), 5 (1642X0 140X9 ml) and 7 (1780X0 53X6 ml) the milk production was not dif- ferent, but their production was higher than T1 (1104X0 81X2 ml). Milk yield increased between 1 and 3 daily milkings, and plateaued between 3 and 7 daily milkings. The milk fat yield did not differ for T5 (73X0 2X0 gal) and T7 (72X8 1X4 gal) but was higher than T1 (58X1 4X3 gal). There was no statistical difference for milk produc- tion between T1 and T2, although milk production for the T1 was 15.4% less than T2. At the same time, the Fig. 3. Average (means SEM) released oxytocin (pg/ml) during 7 (T7) daily milkings. Fig. 4. Average (means SEM) released oxytocin (pg/ml) during the different milking times, independent of the treatments. Table 3 Means and their standard error (SEM) for the total oxytocin released, milk yield, milk fat and milk protein measured during the different treatments Daily milking frequency (treatment) Oxytocin d (pg/ml) Milk yield (ml) Milk fat (g/l) Milk protein (g/l) Milk yield (%) 1 (T1) 213.5 a 34.3 1104.0 a 81.2 58.1 a 4.3 45.5 a 1.2 15.4 2 (T2) 242.4 a 30.1 1305.0 a,b 61.5 65.0 a,b 2.8 44.1 a 1.0 Control 3 (T3) 278.1 a,b 42.1 1755.0 b,c 116.7 70.2 a,b 3.1 43.3 a 0.7 34.5 4 (T4) 447.0 b,c 53.2 1787.0 c 141.5 71.0 a,b 2.1 43.7 a 0.7 37.0 5 (T5) 503.4 b,c 55.0 1642.0 b,c 140.9 73.0 b 2.0 43.3 a 0.6 25.8 7 (T7) 676.3 c 56.8 1780.0 c 53.6 72.8 b 1.4 42.8 a 0.5 37.9 a,b,c Means on the same column with different superscripts differ (P ` 0X05). d Total oxytocin released, i.e. T2 = [first milking (samples 30 60 120 s) second milking (30 60 120 s)[, etc. 184 J.A. Negrao et al. / Small Ruminant Research 39 (2001) 181187 increase on daily milkings from treatments 2 to 3, 2 to 4, 2 to 5 and 2 to 7 caused gains of 34.5, 37.0, 25.8 and 37.9% of milk yield, respectively. The correlations between oxytocin level, and milk yield, protein and fat were not signicant (Table 4). The body weight of the ewes did not change between the beginning (62X0 3X2 kg) and end (60X8 3X0 kg) of the experiment. 4. Discussion In this experiment, baseline levels of oxytocin were not inuenced by hour of the day nor by milking frequency, and when compared with those of other ewes (Fuchs et al., 1987; Mayer et al., 1989) and cows (Sagi et al., 1980; Schams et al., 1984; Gorewit and Gassman, 1985), were similar or slightly higher. At the same time, our data showed that indepen- dently of the number of milkings, the milking machine induced stimuli (Figs. 13), and a signicant release of oxytocin was detected, which conrms that the milk- ing machine induces oxytocin release (Gorewit and Gassman, 1985; Mayer et al., 1989, 1991; Gorewit et al., 1992). Nevertheless, a higher oxytocin dis- charge was recorded in T1. Probably, this high dis- charge was caused by the accumulation of oxytocin, in the neurohypophysis, due to long intervals between milkings. It is also possible that ewes, as others species, rats and women, have an enormous storage of oxytocin in the neurohypophysis (Lincoln and Paisley, 1982), probably higher than the amount required to elicit milk ejection. It is interesting to observe that on the other treat- ments with more than one daily milking, oxytocin release was similar between the rst and the last milking during the same day (i.e. milkings of Fig. 3), which suggests an increase on oxytocin synth- esis. At the same time, the efciency of the stimulus caused by milking machine seems to be the same, because during high milking frequency the ewes pre- sented a fast (from 30 to 60 s after the start of all milkings) and signicant increase in oxytocin levels. These results suggest, that frequent activation of the nervous inux of the udder by the milking machine, increased oxytocin synthesis in the magnocellular neurons of the hypothalamus, and also induced the oxytocin release by the neurohypophysis. Other authors (Gorewit and Sagi, 1983; Bruckmaier et al., 1994a,b) already demonstrated that the increase of the oxytocin levels in blood could facilitate milk transfer from the alveoli to the cistern, and inuenced posi- tively the milk yield. However, Schams et al. (1984) suggested that small increases in circulating oxytocin (35 pg/ml) were effective to induce milk ejection in cows. In this study, oxytocin release (higher level observed during milking baseline levels) was between 19.4 and 74.7 pg/ml, and probably caused a complete ejection of the alveolar milk. This effect was also conrmed by the milkers, since they did not need to strip the ewes. Comparing twice to once daily milkings there was a decrease of 15.4% in milk production, in the present study. In similar conditions, Sardinian and Prealpine ewes milked twice versus once daily, had a decrease of 5.2% (Casu and Labussiere, 1972) and 34.8% (Labus- siere et al., 1974a,b), respectively, in milk production. It is known that Sardinian ewes have a larger cistern when compared to other breeds. For this reason, Sardinian ewes produced more milk with once daily milking than Lacaune (intermediate cistern) and Pre- alpine ewes (little cistern) (Casu and Labussiere, 1972; Labussiere et al., 1974a,b). The physical Table 4 Correlation coefcients between milk yield, milk protein, milk fat, oxytocin levels and total oxytocin release Milk fat Milk protein Oxytocin release during sample (s) Total oxytocin a 0 30 60 120 Milk yield 0.72 (P ` 0X05) 0.91 (P ` 0X05) 0.07 (NS b ) 0.14 (NS) 0.01 (NS) 0.12 (NS) 0.14 (NS) Milk fat 0.84 (P ` 0X05) 0.12 (NS) 0.12 (NS) 0.11 (NS) 0.22 (NS) 0.16 (NS) Milk protein 0.08 (NS) 0.05 (NS) 0.13 (NS) 0.11 (NS) 0.15 (NS) a Total oxytocin released, i.e. T2 = [first milking (samples 30 60 120 s) second milking (30 60 120 s)[, etc. b Not signicant. J.A. Negrao et al. / Small Ruminant Research 39 (2001) 181187 185 capacity of the udder cistern is limited, and prolonged milking intervals increase the intramamary pressure, decreasing, consequently, the milk synthesis effective- ness by the alveolar cells. In this study, the increase from twice to thrice daily milkings caused a milk yield gain of 34.5%. In a similar experiment, with Prealpine du Sud breed (Labussiere et al., 1978), the increase from 2 to 3 daily milkings caused a gain that varied from 15 to 26%. These differences could be attributed to the genetic potential of the studied breeds. It seems that continuous milk synthesis and alveolar milk ejection into the cistern were optimized with 3 daily milkings. Some authors suggested that the increase observed during multiple milkings was pro- voked by cell proliferation (Wilde et al., 1987; Sven- nersten et al., 1990; Wilde and Knight, 1990; Gorewit et al., 1992). However, in our experiment, the short duration of the treatments (6 days) and the use of Latin Square experimental design diminished the possibility of a cell proliferation. Indeed, the modest gain observed from 4 up to 7 daily milkings reinforced this observation. Generally, the increase of milk production is asso- ciated with a decrease of the milk constituents (Hen- derson and Peaker, 1987; Barnes et al., 1990), however, total milk fat yield was signicantly higher for 5 and 7 daily milkings in this study. It is also possible that frequent milkings could stimulate local synthesis of the milk fat within the mammary gland (Barnes et al., 1990; Svennersten et al., 1990; Wilde and Knight, 1990). It is more probable that frequent milk ejections increased the proportion of fat alveolar milk, which increased total milk fat content (Labus- siere, 1988; Knight and Dewhurst, 1994). Some authors (Hillerton et al., 1990; Svennersten et al., 1990; Wilde et al., 1989) suggested that this increase in milk production and milk fat was caused by a metabolic adaptation. In other researches, the increase in milk production and milk fat was explained by reduction in body weight (Barnes et al., 1990; Svennersten et al., 1990; Wilde et al., 1989). In this study, body weight did not change between the begin- ning (62X0 3X2 kg) and the end (60X8 3X0 kg) of the experiment. However, hay and concentrate were fed in accordance to milk production (20%), since there was no leftover, we can assume that the feed intake increased. In conclusion, for treatments with 1 and 2 milkings daily, the limiting factor for milk yield should be the capacity of the cisternal storage. However, oxytocin release did not seem to be a limiting factor for milk production when high milking frequencies were used. When 5 and 7 milkings daily were studied, there were modest milk yield gains, probably, the limiting factor was the milk synthesis rate. Better interaction between continuous milk synthesis and alveolar milk ejection was observed during 3 milkings daily, consequently an important milk yield gain was measured. In many countries milk from dairy sheep is of great economic importance, our results suggest that the increase of milking frequency could be used to improve ef- ciently milk production of the many breeds. Acknowledgements The authors thank M. Beauls, A. Briand, F. De La Chevalerie, J.F. Combaud, J. De Saint Jan, P. Lam- bion, M. Chorho, J. Le Bail, C. Yard, P. Rolland and E. Siroux, for technical assistance. References Barnes, M.A., Pearson, R.E., Lukes-Wilson, A.J., 1990. Effects of milking frequency and selection for milk yield on productive efcience of Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 16031611. Bruckmaier, R.M., Ritter, C., Schams, D., Blum, J.W., 1994a. Machine milking of dairy goats during lactation: udder anatomy, milking characteristics, and blood concentrations of oxytocin and prolactin. J. Dairy Res. 61, 457466. Bruckmaier, R.M., Schams, D., Blum, J.W., 1994b. Continuously elevated concentrations of oxytocin during milking are necessary for complete milk removal in dairy cows. J. Dairy Res. 61, 323334. Carruthers, V.R., Davis, S.R., Copeman, P.J.A., 1993. Effects of oxytocin, machine stripping and milking rate on production loss of cows milked once a day. J. Dairy Res. 60, 1318. Casu, S., Labussiere, J., 1972. Premiers resultats concernant la suppression d'une ou plusieurs traites par semaine chez la brebis Sarde. Ann. Zootech. 21, 223232. Denamur, R., Martinet, J., 1961. Action de l'ocytocine sur la secretion du lait de brebis. Ann. Endocrin. 22, 776785. Fuchs, A.R., Ayromlooi, J., Rasmussen, A.B., 1987. Oxytocin response to conditioned and nonconditioned stimuli in lactating ewes. Biol. Reprod. 37, 301309. Gorewit, R.C., Gassman, K.B., 1985. Effects of duration of udder stimulation on milking dynamics and oxytocin release. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 18131818. 186 J.A. Negrao et al. / Small Ruminant Research 39 (2001) 181187 Gorewit, R.C., Sagi, R., 1983. Effects of exogenous oxytocin on production and milking variables. J. Dairy Sci. 67, 20502054. Gorewit, R.C., Svennersten, K., Butler, W.R., Uvnas-Moberg, K., 1992. Endocrine responses in cows milked by hand and machine. J. Dairy Sci. 75, 443448. Henderson, A.J., Peaker, M., 1987. Effects of removing milk from the mammary ducts and alveoli, or of diluting stored milk, on the rate of milk secretion in the goat. J. Exp. Phys. 72, 1319. Hillerton, J.E., Knight, C.H., Turvey, A., Wheathley, S.D., Wilde, C.J., 1990. Milk yield and mammary function in dairy cows milked four times daily. J. Dairy Res. 57, 285294. INRA, 1990. INRA-John Libbey Eurotext, London, 389 pp. Knight, C.H., Dewhurst, R.J., 1994. Once daily milking of dairy cows: relationship between yield loss and cisternal milk storage. J. Dairy Res. 61, 441449. Knight, C.H., Brown, J.R., Wilde, C.J., 1996. Milk secretion and quality. In: Blum J.W., Bruckmaier, R.M. (Eds.), Symposium on Milk Synthesis, Secretion and Removal in Ruminants. Univ. of Berne, School of Veterinary Medicine, Berne, Switzerland, pp. 1821. Labussiere, J., 1988. Review of physiological and anatomical factors inuencing the milking ability of ewes and the organisation of milking. Livest. Prod. Sci. 18, 253274. Labussiere, J., Martinet, J., 1964. Description of two equipments for automatic milk ow recording during machine milking. Ann. Zootech. 13 (2), 159190. Labussiere, J., Combaud, J.F., Petrequin, P., 1974a. Effects de la suppression de la traite du dimanche soir sur les brebis de race Prealpes du Sud. Ann. Zootech. 23, 435444. Labussiere, J., Combaud, J.F., Petrequin, P., 1974b. Inuence de la frequence des traites et des tetees sur la production laitiere des brebis Prealpes du Sud. Ann. Zootech. 23, 445457. Labussiere, J., Combaud, J.F., Petrequin, P., 1978. Inuence respective de la frequence quotidienne des evacuations mammaires et des stimulations du pis sur l'entretien de la secretion lactee chez la brebis. Ann. Zootech. 27, 127137. Lincoln, D.W., Paisley, A.C., 1982. Neuroendocrine control of milk ejection. J. Reprod. Fertil. 65, 571586. Marnet, P.G., Volland, H., Pradelles, P., Grassi, J., Beauls, M., 1994. Subpicogram determination of oxytocin by an enzyme immunoassay using acetylcholinesterase as label. J. Immu- noassay 1, 3553. Mayer, H., Weber, F., Segesseman, V., 1989. Oxytocin release and milking characteristics of Eastfriesian and Lacaune dairy sheep. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium of Machine Milking of Small Ruminants, Tel Aviv, Israel, pp. 548563. Mayer, H., Bruckmaier, R., Schams, D., 1991. Lactational changes in oxytocin release, intramammary pressure and milking characteristics in dairy cows. J. Dairy Res. 58, 159169. Sagi, R., Gorewit, R.C., Merrill, W.G., Wilson, D.B., 1980. Premilking stimulation effects on milking performance and oxytocin and prolactin release in cows. J. Dairy Sci. 63, 800 808. SAS, 1990. SAS User's Guide, Version 6, Vol. 2, 4th Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. Schams, D., Mayer, H., Prokopp, A., Worstorff, H., 1984. Oxytocin secretion during milking in dairy cows with regard to the variation and importance of a threshold level for milk removal. J. Endocrinol. 102, 337343. Svennersten, K., Claesson, C.O., Nelson, L., 1990. Effect of local stimulation of one quarter on milk production and milk components. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 970981. Wilde, C.J., Knight, C.H., 1990. Milk yield and mammary function in goats and after once-daily milking. J. Dairy Res. 57, 441 447. Wilde, C.J., Calvert, D.T., Daly, A., Knight, C.H., Peaker, M., 1987. The effect of goat milk fractions on synthesis of milk constituents by rabbit mammary explants and on milk yield in vivo. Biochem. J. 242, 285290. Wilde, C.J., Blatchford, D.R., Knight, C.H., Peaker, M., 1989. Metabolic adaptations in goat mammary tissue during long- term incomplete milking. J. Dairy Res. 56, 715. J.A. Negrao et al. / Small Ruminant Research 39 (2001) 181187 187