Você está na página 1de 17

Developing Integrated

Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

Justin S M Basini
Differ, London

June 2001
Developing Integrated Multiple Channel Brand Experiences


1.0 Overview

2.0 Introduction

3.0 Analysing Competitive Advantage

4.0 Customer Interaction with Brands and Channels

Case Study: Financial Services Channel Evolution

5.0 The Way Businesses Manage Technology

6.0 A Framework for Developing Brand Experiences and

Translating Them into Channels

7.0 The Framework Viewed as a Process

8.0 Conclusion

Case Studies: SEB and Nokia

Differ, London June 2001 Page 1 of 17

Developing Integrated Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

1.0 Overview

Delivering integrated multiple channel experiences, in today’s increasingly complex brand landscapes,
is vital for enhancing brand awareness, creating value and building stronger relationships with
customers. Developing these integrated multiple channel experiences is complex since most
businesses manage channels vertically reducing their ability to integrate and innovate around the
customers experience of the brand. However in our experience slight inconsistencies across the
channel experiences can have a negative impact on overall brand perception.

Our experience working with both large global companies and innovative entrepreneurial ventures
has shown that both established and new businesses are confronted with significant challenges in
developing integrated brand building multiple channel experiences. We present here a framework for
developing multiple channel strategies built on the following key insights:

Understand a brands competitive advantage and structure this understanding.

• Deconstructing competitive advantage into three vectors: content (what a brand delivers),
context (how you deliver the product or service) and infrastructure (the channels of
distribution and production) is an important input into developing integrated multiple
channel experiences. This allows a ‘holistic’ view to be taken of how and what the brand can
deliver to increase value and relationship with the customer.

Consumers do not think in channels

• Customers focus on end benefits, what they need, and then unconsciously choose the most
relevant and convenient channel to get this end benefit. They expect the brand to behave in
the same way across all channels. Therefore brands must understand their experience from
this holistic viewpoint and reflect this as much as possible in the organisational structures.

Businesses should understand how their processes and organisation impacts the experience
• Most businesses organise around vertical channels (internet, store, call centre etc) and not
customer segments. Structuring around the customer gives a higher chance of gaining
significant competitive advantage however is complex and more difficult to manage
especially is transitioning from a vertical approach. Pragmatically a business should make
efforts to understand their approach, analyse for strengths and weaknesses and take
appropriate action.

Define the overall brand experience in isolation of channel

• Brands that use multiple channels seamlessly to deliver a coherent experience to customers
have a strong idea of their overall brand experience. The brand proposition and a deep
understanding of customer needs (in four areas: communication, information, location and
transactional dimensions) is the foundation for developing a customer-eye view of the
experience including content and context development.

Use channel capability and customer usage to segment the brand experience into the
• The overall brand experience can be segmented into different channel experiences based on
two pragmatic filters: the current capability of the channel and the current usage of the
channel by the customer. A clear and realistic definition of the channel experience can then
be created. These channel experiences should be linked via ‘experience threads’ that become
the hallmarks of the experience for the customer.

Differ, London June 2001 Page 2 of 16

Developing Integrated Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

2.0 Introduction
There have never been more ways to touch customers. There have never before been
so many people involved in delivering customer experiences. As businesses we can now
get onto the screens, papers, high streets, pockets, radios of our customers. We can
tickle ears, eyes, and noses, trigger happiness, amusement, disappointment and anger
in more ways than ever.

There are more messages than ever bombarding consumers every day. With over 4000
new launches in the UK every year demand for the consumers attention is increasingly
competitive. Marketers have pioneered with new channels (e.g. iTV, SMS, internet,
WAP, the call centre etc) in order to gain some cut through – a new and novel (for a
while) approach – to touching customers. In response to our huge expectations of
customers they are becoming more and more demanding. We are expecting them to
negotiate increasingly sophisticated brand landscapes and in return they are expecting
more and more of the companies they favour with their attention.

A famous t-shirt that was popular on the West Coast of the US in 1999 proclaimed:

"All I Ask Is That

You Treat Me
No Differently
Than You
Would the
US T-Shirt Slogan

Customers are demanding a simpler, more focused, better, more caring, more
respectful relationship with the brands with which they chose to associate themselves.
Also with the move to much more emotional relationships with brands consumers
need more information, greater comfort and greater control over the relationship.

Here lies the fundamental tension that has led to fragmented, confusing and difficult
to manage multiple channel brand experiences. We as businesses want to get as many
messages and as large a response as we can through the different channels we chose.
This however leads to too much information, greater discomfort and loss of control for
the customer.

This tension is compounded by the fact that most organisations structure around
products and specific channels rather than customers or experiences. Most businesses
measure the success of a product, service, campaign, or development vertically down a
channel. We measure page impressions, phone calls, web sales, store sales, customers
acquired and that’s how we reward our people. This structure can be easier to manage
than structuring around customers however it results in few linkages between the
different channels and a confusing brand experience for the customer. This impacts
negatively the customers’ impression of the brand that affects brand equity and
ultimately revenues and profits.

3.0 Analysing Competitive Advantage

Employing a simple framework to structure the analysis of competitive advantage is an
important way to begin the process of building a coherent multiple channel

Differ, London June 2001 Page 3 of 16

Developing Integrated Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

Competitive advantage can be understood through three vectors: content, context and

The substance of the products and services a company provides

The processes by which the company provides and creates its products and services

The experience of delivery, the “how” of what a company delivers, captured in the
brand and it’s experience.

Figure 1 Competitive Advantage should be analysed in three axes

For example a technology company, such as Palm or (maybe surprisingly) Procter &
Gamble, with a unique product or service to introduce to the market is competing on
the content axis – their challenge is to drive sales, manufacturing and maybe expand
internationally, all infrastructure advantages. Since all unique technology becomes
generic eventually they also need to pay attention to the contextual axis (the brand
and experience dimension) in order to build intangible softer assets that can be a
continuing source of advantage.

The heavily branded companies such as Coca-Cola or Nike, build their competitive
advantage on the context and infrastructure axes. Essentially a generic product is
turned into something meaningful and more valuable to the consumer because of the
brand – the context. The businesses with the most sustained competitive advantage
balance all three axes with excellence. Many companies focus on only two of the three
(most often missed is the context axis) and in the long term get into the ‘innovation
trap’ – having to pour more and more resources into innovation to sustain advantage
built solely on content.

When building multiple channel experiences, analysing the experience from these
three axes is a key to unlocking innovation, interest and developing the seamless
experience. The content axis should focus on understanding that content will be
differentiated and which will be generic with a realisation that the majority of content
will always be generic. The context is the key differentiator of the experience and is

Differ, London June 2001 Page 4 of 16

Developing Integrated Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

the way in which we deliver our content. Inherently within this axis are the softer
values that will form the relationship with the customer. Obviously because of this
they rely on a clear and deep understanding of the customer relationship. Crucially the
most engaging experiences are those, which develop core content and context before
developing the specific infrastructure of delivery. Once the brand experience is defined
and compelling then it is time to focus on where and when we deliver it through
infrastructure (e.g. iTV, Call Centre, Store, Web, Print, Mobile etc).

4.0 Customers interaction with brands and channels

Businesses think in terms of channels, consumers think in terms of brands, pieces of
information and daily interactions. Customers do not think in terms of channels.
Customers expect all interactions with the brand to be consistent and provide them
with knowledge, opportunities, and great customer service. Simply they want value
that justifies their time, effort and money. In more and more industries, from the car
industry to retail banking, managing an increasingly complex multiple channel strategy
effectively and delivering a seamless experience across multiple interaction points is a
key source of competitive advantage (see Fig. 2 The Need for a Multi-Channel

Figure 2 The Need for a Multiple Channel Strategy (From McKinsey Report Multi-channel Marketing)

Brand owners put lower priority on understanding what a customer wants through a
channel but rather see the challenge as giving existing products and services through
the new channel as it arises. ‘Getting there first’ is an is a misleadingly attractive focus
when a new channel appears however experience shows once it’s been done customers
quickly select those things that add value to their lives through the new channel and
that which doesn’t. There is great danger that by just focusing on delivering existing
products on new channels, we miss the opportunities for innovation that ultimately
will deliver true value to customers and enhance the overall brand experience.

Financial Services is a category that illustrates this key point. Often innovation is de-
prioritised in favour of translation of the existing products and services into the new
channel. This chasing of products and technology ignores the ability of the new
channel to deliver new enhanced value and innovation. (See Case Study - Financial
Services Channel Evolution).

Differ, London June 2001 Page 5 of 16

Developing Integrated Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

Case Study - Financial Services Channel Evolution

The financial services industry in the UK was widely regarded as being slow to pick up new channels. This was true for
both telephone banking and Internet. Much effort is now being placed by the industry on developing the mobile and iTV
channels so as ‘not to miss the boat’.

The introduction of the first ‘hero’ telephone banking service in the UK (by HSBC), First Direct, changed the norms of
the category and for those customers that switched truly delighted them. How did First Direct deliver value? They
developed a service that was pleasant to use, worked and above all put the customer in control. For the first time in the
UK a customer could get access to account information, transactions, and advice 24 hours a day 365 days a year. This
creation of a step change in level of benefit is a great example of how a new channel can deliver true value to the
customer. However by defining themselves by their channel and not their end benefit First Direct made a mistake.
Instead of being ‘the bank which delivered new levels of control’ they were the ‘telephone bank’. Whilst egg, first-e and
smile were pioneering the internet banking revolution First Direct was struggling to understand how to integrate the new
channel into their offering. If you are a telephone bank how do you become the telephone and internet bank?
Key lesson: define service or product offerings on customer benefits not from a technology or channel

Since First Direct customers have become increasingly sophisticated within financial services. The internet banking
brands, egg and smile, have been successful by taking a multiple channel route. They are internet banks with other
channel access points, however, learning from First Direct, they have decided to define themselves by benefit rather
than a specific channel. First-e which very much defined itself by its channel has been far less successful in acquiring
customers. Customers are becoming more and more comfortable with the use of different channels therefore they look
much more for a match between their aspirations and the brand not just a class leading delivery through one channel.
Key lesson: Whilst ‘getting there first’ has short-term benefit, ultimately customers don’t think in channels.

If customers don’t think in channels then surely the large established multiple channel banks must have an advantage.
Natwest, Barclays, HSBC, Halifax have high street presence, call centres, internet divisions, ability to develop WAP and
iTV services – so one could hypothesis that these players will be the winners. The large banks do have the opportunity
to deliver through multiple channels. However based on past experience they do not take the advantage and it is only
the shapers like for example, First Direct and egg, that have the ability to understand a channel for it’s inherent ability to
deliver value in new ways.
Key lesson: stay close to technology, learn fast and integrate and innovate from a customer perspective, don’t
just replicate existing products on the new channel.

The key opportunity in the future will be for financial services institutions to really understand and predict customer
behaviour through the different channels and deliver a class leading financial services experience across many
channels. That’s more than having the best telephone bank, the best internet bank, the most modern high street banks,
it’s about challenging convention to deliver the most value to a target group by providing the most appropriate, most
relevant financial services experience.

The understanding and prediction of customer needs will be key sources of

competitive advantage for brands wanting to deliver world-class experiences. Being
able to understand what opportunities are presented by new channels and predicting
how customers will use the channels (without being too prescriptive), will allow
innovative class leading multiple channel experiences to be developed.

Staying close to technology development is extremely important within this process

however what is more important is to remain close to the reality of the mass market
and understand that the adoption curve will be progressed slowly if we add no benefit
to our customers.

Differ, London June 2001 Page 6 of 16

Developing Integrated Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

5.0 The Way Businesses Manage Technology

Technology is always challenging to manage. Therefore it is unsurprising that we tend
to organise it in a linear fashion buying in expertise around that technology and adding
this interaction point as an adjunct to the current brand experience. When managed
tightly with a clear customer led strategy this approach can work. However it relies on
a top down control approach, which is less attuned with the way we manage
organisations today.

Many organisations are moving to a customer-centric approach where everybody in

the organisation, irrespective of role (or technology channel) is aware of the experience
that needs to be delivered and their role within its delivery. If managed appropriately
this approach allows much more activity to be focused on delivering customer value as
opposed to controlling activities. Ultimately organisations that adopt this approach to
managing their customer experiences will develop enhanced competitive advantage.

A powerful benefit of decentralising the delivery of customer experience and not

thinking in terms of channels is that there is increased chance that synergies will be
identified and delivered through the different channels. Since in many cases delivering
a multiple channel experience is about driving cross-sell any potential synergies
harnessed will increase brand building.

Figure 3 Organisations have a strategic choice when creating multiple channel experiences

Organisations have a strategic choice (see Fig 3) about whether to organise around
channel (multiple channel strategy) or customer segments (a consumer based multi-
channel strategy). The ability to deliver a seamless experience comes when the internal
organisation mirrors the external customer in its organisational delivery and
development processes. This requires a much more customer-based approach.

Ultimately in order to manage people, the existing organisational approach and deliver
customer value most organisations will have to adopt a mix of both models. However
the strategic imperative must be to putting the customer first in order to deliver value,
drive synergy and create a compelling brand experience.

Differ, London June 2001 Page 7 of 16

Developing Integrated Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

6.0 A Framework for Developing Brand Experiences and

translating them into channels
The framework presented here for developing multiple channel brand experiences (see
fig.4) relies on a core belief that brand experiences and customer understanding must
come before the development of any channel specific applications or approaches.
Understand the brand, the target and how you can deliver value then think about
channels. This is purely a reflection of how we believe customers interact with
businesses and brands.

Figure 4 A Framework for Developing Multiple Channel Experiences

The key to the framework is that the brand proposition, target group definition/needs
and content/context development are central to the development of the brand
experience. This then leads the segmentation of content and context down the vertical
channels. Understanding how consumers need to experience the brand should form
the basis of the channel development. This channel specific development needs to be
then based on the brand experience but also pragmatic considerations such as target
group usage and current capability of the channel. The result is a description of the
channel experience and how it segments the content, context and delivers the overall
brand experience.

It is perhaps unsurprising that we believe the brand proposition and target group
definition should be the basis for any developments. However both content and
contextual developments in most companies are generally driven by vertical channel

Differ, London June 2001 Page 8 of 16

Developing Integrated Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

considerations. This we believe reduces the ability to innovate and think differently
about delivering a holistic experience. Hence in this framework content and contextual
development guides brand experience development. These key steps together then get
prioritised into each channel.

Crucially we also believe that each channel experience needs to link via ‘experience
threads’. These are key approaches, symbols and language that a brand can use which
become common and obvious between the channels. Consumers do not think in
channels therefore slight inconsistencies become difficult to manage when building a
brand mind space. Therefore we must make it obvious and clear to consumers
experiencing different channels that they share a set of common guidelines. Simply
this could be a similar look and feel but can stretch powerfully into similar purchasing
or customer service approaches e.g. Amazon One click purchasing on Internet, iTV and

Additionally for success the multiple channel approach must be seen within the
“Not everyone knows
realities of the business situation. Over the past few years with the hype of the
what their phone can
‘internet revolution’ and for a while with the emergent WAP channel businesses
Two-thirds of the GB’s
committed much resource to deliver their products, services or information through
adult population has a these new channels. With hindsight much of this resource was at best difficult to
mobile phone. Only 85% measure a return on and at worst wasted. The simple fact is that many brands do not
of these believe they need a complex multiple channel experience. A slavish need to exploit all new
have a text messaging technology opportunities disregarding realities of usage patterns and technical
facility on the phone development leads to wasted efforts. Let’s remember most consumers haven’t even
whilst 13% of people heard of WAP! Therefore all businesses need to understand the key driving reasons
believe they have a why they need to commit time and money in creating a multiple channel experience
WAP-enabled phone (for and then understand how they will measure a return on this investment.
both facilities, the actual
incidence is probably Taken together all the channel definitions and parameters derived from the overall
higher).” brand experience deliver a valuable experience to the customer. By taking a customer
experience based approach brand owners can create a fuller, more compelling and
BMRB 2001 seamless experience which delivers greater value to the customer and the business
both in terms of organisational focus and ultimately revenues.

7.0 The Framework viewed as a Process

The framework can be viewed as a process for development as outlined in Fig 5 (see
page 10).


The first stages of the process are about creating the ideal brand experience
irrespective of channel. We believe that a brand must understand the experience
(including content and context) it wants to deliver holistically to a customer and then
think about segmenting this experience into the different channels.

The Input
• What is the current business scenario?
• What is the key business reason for building a multiple channel experience?
• What channels are already being implemented?
• What are the channels which the customer is using now?

The input phase is focused on collecting the key reasons why a multiple channel
experience is important and why it is being prioritised as a project within the
organisation. This phase elicits the key business needs, such as the need for cross-sell
or drive costs down, which form the basis for the project in addition to, or over and
above, the creation of brand value or customer value.

Differ, London June 2001 Page 9 of 16

Developing Integrated Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

Figure 5 The Framework viewed as a Process

Differ, London June 2001 Page 10 of 16

Developing Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

Brand Proposition

• What value do we add to customers?

• What do we believe in as a brand?
• What do we stand for?
• What are we the best in the world at?
• Who are our strategic competitors?
• How are we different?

The brand proposition stage probes the current brand position and seeks to isolate the
key sources of competitive advantage for the brand and it’s position in the market.

Target Group Definition

• Who do we add value to?

• Do we understand what we mean in their lives?
• Do we really know them including their beliefs and attitudes?
• Do we understand their needs within: information, communication, transactions and

Consumer understanding is essential to build good multiple channel experiences.

Developing a good understanding of where, when, how and why we fit into our
customers’ lives is essential if a brand is to satisfy their needs. We have identified four
core areas as important in building multiple channel brand experiences. We need to
develop an understanding of how our target uses information, how and why they
communicate, what transactions (both purchases and informational transactions) they
perform, and where they want these needs satisfied (location needs). This
understanding needs to go beyond the surface and focus in-depth on discovering both
emotional and functional needs for each target group.

Content / Context Development

We believe that both content and context need to be

delivered consistently whilst driving innovation in
product and service development. At this stage
development considerations are in isolation of the
channels. In the next phase of the process this content
and context is segmented on the infrastructure axis as
we define the channel experiences and development

The key content questions that are important are:

• What is the content which we must deliver?

• How does our content deliver our brand proposition?
• What is the content we could make different?
• What is the content we could innovate and invent?
• How can we get our customers involved in the
development of the channel?

Differ, London June 2001 Page 11 of 16

Developing Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

The key contextual questions for development:

• What is our unique context – the ‘how’ of the content we deliver?
• What is our current context – it’s strengths and weaknesses?
• How can we turn our brand proposition into a compelling context?
• What is our current context and how can we create new context?
• How does our context reflect our understanding of target groups?

For established brands much of the core content and context may already be
developed. However the key to unlocking a differentiated yet integrated multiple
channel experience is to examine the content and context from a new perspective.
This perspective is the ‘brand experience filter’ and relies on a clear understanding of
the value that the brand adds in the lives of its customers. It’s not about thinking, for
example, ‘we have a great bank account how can we translate this into a WAP
experience’, but rather thinking at this stage ‘what does the customer need from this
product and our brand to add maximum value to their lives’. Channel development
then comes later once this is defined.

Brand Experience

• What is the overall experience which we need to deliver?

• What, why, when, where and how will this experience impact the lives of our customer?
• How can we create synergies between elements of the experience?
• How can we use entertainment / infotainment to create a multiple channel experience?

The final stage in the brand experience creation process is the development of a core
description of the overall experience that we want to deliver. Ideally this is seen in the
light of the customer needs, which were investigated at the earlier stage in the process.
This experience should be broken down into key elements of the experience. Detailed in
the experience description is how these elements synergise and support each other,
including an analysis of the commonalities and differences between these core
elements. Most usefully the brand experience description should be taken to the stage
of ‘telling the story’ from a customer view and validating as far as possible. This
consumer approach allows brand owners to see the experience much more as an
engaging part of a customer’s life. The best brand experiences are built on trustful
engagingness and to this end entertainment / infotainment is something that should
always be considered as a key way of delivering through different channels.
Entertainment is a key way to drive engagingness of a brand experience and viewing a
product or service from this new point of view often opens up new ideas and
innovation for the overall experience.

Finally before the brand experience is committed to the next stage of the process a
check step must be made which outlines how the brand experience supports and
challenges the core brand proposition.


The second phase of the process is focused on understanding how the ideal brand
experience can be segmented, developed and delivered through into a compelling
channel brand experiences. This is based on pragmatic capabilities of both the channel
and the customer.

Differ, London June 2001 Page 12 of 16

Developing Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

Target Group Customer Usage and Capability of Channel

These two factors are the pragmatic filters that must be used in order to deliver an
experience that is compelling, but also realistic in its expectation of customer
behaviour and the technical capabilities of the channel. There are too many examples
of brands that over stretched either the technology (e.g. Boo.com – flash heavy site
that took too long to download) or the customer (e.g. the co-buying concept of sites
such as LetsBuyIt.com).

Key questions to ask in assessing target group usage are:

• What is the current and predicted usage of the channel by the target?
• How can we lead customer usage of the channel?
• Where is the channel most used?

Key questions to ask in assessing the current technology capability of the channel are:

• What is the current capability of the channel?

• What is the technology timeline 12, 24, 36 months out?
• Which customers will early adopt the technology?
• What is the channels main use?

Often it is also useful at this stage to conduct some research with leading edge
consumers to understand the ways that new technology could impact the behaviour
patterns of the mass market as technologies become more mainstream. This
definition of the adoption cycle can then be used to develop an understanding of how
the brand experience can be delivered in the future and how we should try and
encourage our customers to interact with their brands. From this a map can be
developed of which channels are relevant now and in the near future.

Channel Experience definition and development parameters

This stage delivers the key actionable output of the process. What’s needed is to
create a clear definition channel experience from the customer’s point of view.
Building from the (non channel specific) brand experience we can now develop a
definition of the experience through the relevant channels.

The major focus should be on developing a clear view of how the content can be
segmented by channel which when experienced by the end consumer in totality
across the channels delivers a holistic brand experience. We should not expect that all
content and context will be delivered through each channel. The decisions on what to
deliver through which channel must be based on the customer needs so far developed
combined with the insight gained about who is using what channel and how good the
current development of the channel is.

Each description of the channel experience should then be examined in relation to the
overall brand experience and an experience map constructed which maps by target
segment who experiences what, through what channel and why it’s compelling. This
describes the key parameters of how the brand experience is delivered and leads onto
technical specification development. Thought should also be given to how we link and
synergise across the channels.

Differ, London June 2001 Page 13 of 16

Developing Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

Experience Threads

We believe that it is extremely important to build linking elements across channels to

allow the customer to recognise and feel comfortable interacting with the brand
through each different channel. These are effectively the ‘hallmarks’ of the brand

On a surface level these can be a consistent design – look and feel – of the brand
through each channel. (Even this can be challenging for example implementing a
corporate identity on a 96x60 pixel mobile screen is no easy task!) At a deeper level
these linking threads can be an approach to service delivery, such as always using first
names, or using the same interaction process such as the same topics being delivered
by Yahoo on both internet and WAP sites.

• What are the key deliveries from the multiple channel brand experiences?
• How and when a we going to measure success?
• How do measure cross sell and brand building?
• What ROI do we expect?

Measuring success of a multiple channel strategy is often complex and will need to
include both soft and hard measures. Measures such as customer value on a segment
basis, share of wallet, share of time, retention and migration, channel usage and
service quality are all basic measures. One key area that has caused issues in the past
is measuring cross-sell. This issue can be tackled by understanding, albeit often on a
qualitative basis, the channels commonly used and customer behaviour within these
channels before a purchase decision is made.

One key metric that should be considered is whether Profit and Loss is measured on a
channel basis or across channels perhaps on a segment-by-segment customer basis.
Measuring on a customer basis has been found to encourage cross sell and integration
of development across channels.

8.0 Conclusion
Taking an integrated channel approach based on understanding the overall brand
experience that is delivered is no longer a luxury or only for those brands which have
the resources to do it.

Customers expect us to deliver to them with excellence through many different

channels, understanding that they choose to reward us with their time and effort when
they receive benefit from our businesses.

Practically we have to deal with the ‘legacy systems’ of organisations. Channel

technologies have been developed and have most often been tagged onto the existing
delivery capabilities. This reduces the ability to innovate and provide new levels of
benefit satisfying new or existing benefits.

By creating a brand experience definition in isolation of channel but which is

developed from a core understanding of the brand and customer needs we can start to
develop content and context which delights customers. Taking this to channel
experiences is then a case of understanding usage and technology capability.

Traditionally the established brands have rarely been able to predict how their
customers will adopt and use new channels. Customers of these brands are demanding
integrated multiple channel experiences. ‘Jumping on the band-wagon’ late and

Differ, London June 2001 Page 14 of 16

Developing Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

throwing resources against translating products onto the new channel leads to, at best,
a decreased ability to innovate and, at worst, inconsistencies which turn the customer
away from the brand. Considering channel development from a brand experience and
customer point of view is a way to control and focus activities against those that will
add value.

However the new players, often built around a new benefit that a new channel can
deliver, are also finding it increasingly difficult to respond to their customers need for
integrated multiple channel experiences. These companies often do not fully
understand the benefits of their brand once disassociated from a particular channel.
This decreases their ability to continue their innovation and move into new channels.
Developing a clear understanding of their brand position, target group and overall
brand experience again will increase the ability to deliver value through multiple

Taking a customer experience based view of the holistic brand experience and
delivering with obvious seamless-ness, excellence and innovation through all channels
will be the hallmark of the multiple channel winners.

Justin Basini is Managing Director of Differ, London and has worked with, amongst others, Shell,
Unilever, Ericsson and World Online on brand development and multiple channel issues.

Contact Differ London for further copies or information.

Differ, London
38 Belgrave Square

T: +44 (0)207 2010300

F: +44 (0)207 2010301

Email: Justin.basini@differ.com

Differ, Stockholm
SE-11135 Stockholm

T: +46 (0)8 545 135 00

F: +46 (0)8 545 135 01

Email: sara.ohrvall@differ.com

Differ, London – Differ, Stockholm - www.differ.com

Differ, London June 2001 Page 15 of 16

Developing Multiple Channel Brand Experiences

Case Study: SEB Sweden – A model for customer-centric channel development

The progressive Swedes have lead the way in the development and uptake of internet and mobile telephone channels
in recent years. About 5 years ago, SEB, a traditional financial services provider, developed it’s internet banking facility
and quite soon discovered that it’s “internet” customers were about 2.5 times more active, and consequently 2.5 times
more profitable. This heralded a turning point in the company strategy and it focused on how it could add value to this
expanding, active customer base through the development of it’s channels, to create a seamless banking experience.
SEB were recently recognised by JP Morgan as one of the ‘internet shapers’ of the European financial services

SEB Channel Activities

Today SEB leads Europe in the development of customer-centric financial services, based around the insight that each
channel needs to provide new, relevant opportunities that build the empowerment for the customer. This central theme
provides the glue that unites the channel development and enables the organisation to develop and deliver class-
leading customer relationships and satisfaction.

Case Study: The Nokia Game - November to December 2000

In reality it’s only a game.

Perhaps one of the most innovative examples of multi-channel development occurred late last year when Nokia
introduced a truly multi-channel experience in the form of a game for mobile phone owners across Europe. The central
premise of the “adventure” was a new type of all media experience that put you as a player in the shoes of the main
character in a fictional story. In order to survive, you had to solve a number of challenges and puzzles on his behalf and
over time unravel the situation you were in.

To enable you to do this, Nokia used multiple channels to send messages and clues, themed around their brand
concept of “Connecting People” by asking you to “keep connected”. The simplest messages were posted on the
website, but as the game progressed new channels were introduced including phone (SMS/voicemails), print media
(magazines/newspapers), new websites and even a short clips on radio and TV. You literally had to keep your eyes and
ears open at all times to stay with the pace, and once you missed a clue you were mercilessly removed from the game!

On one level, you could describe this as an advanced integrated marketing campaign that was well executed across the
different media. On another level, by seamlessly integrating the use of multi-channels into a coherent and compelling
story, the Nokia brand extended it’s relationship with it’s customer base and beyond. By thinking about the way the
gaming industry creates adventure concepts they were able to engage people behind the story, to the extent that a
number of unofficial sites were spawned where the game players could discuss developments and share clues - the
ultimate response for a brand that is all about connecting people and a highly talked about and successful campaign.

Differ, London June 2001 Page 16 of 16