Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Figure 2
10,
10, 300, 800, and 2 4300,
0 0 k g800 and
B a tc h e s2400
o f C kg
o m Batches
p le te C e llof
C u ltu re
Complete M e Cell
d ia Culture Media
120
2400 kg Batch 300 kg Batch
800 kg Batch 10 kg Batch
110
t (%
A m o u n(%)
100
Amount
90
80 C y s tin e
M et
Val
H is
Thr
Ser
Phe
T yr
Asp
Asn
G ly
Leu
L ys
G lu
G ln
Arg
P ro
T rp
A la
M e d ia C o m p o n e ts Ile
Media components
Figure 2: Amino acid homogeneity of pin mill media.
Note: Gln was not in the media formulations for the 300, 800 and 10 kg batches.
Figure 3
110
Amount (%)
105
100
95
90
85
80
e
12
e
d
n
in
c
id
in
ci
vi
in
am
B
am
ox
A
la
Z
in
of
hi
ic
id
in
m
ol
ib
T
yr
ot
it a
R
F
P
ic
V
N
M e d ia Co mp o n e n ts
Media components
www.safcbiosciences.com
Analytical Comparison sample of pin-milled media made in both the CM and SSPM.
An analytical comparison of pin-milled and ball-milled media Figures 4 and 5 show the results of that comparison.
was performed using EX-CELL™ CD CHO DPM. This medium
was chosen because it is complex, yet chemically defined These data show the same formulation will contain equal
(contains no hydrolysates) and serum-free. One lot of ball- amounts of individual components, within the normal assay
milled DPM was tested quantitatively for amino acids, variability range, regardless of being produced via ball mill,
vitamins and zinc, along with a beginning, middle and end large-scale (CM) or small-scale pin mill (SSPM).
Figure 4
AnalyticalofComparison
Analytical Comparison ofPin-Milled
Ball-Milled and Ball-Milled
Celland
Culture
Pin-Milled Cell Culture Media
Media
120
CM Batch
ball-milled
SSPM Batch
110
Ball-Milled
100
Percent ofof
Percent
90
80
I le
u
r
p
r
lu
Cy al
g
s
ly
r
n
p
s
et
e
Th
Se
Ty
Ph
Tr
Pr
Al
Ar
Hi
As
As
Le
Ly
in
G
M
st
Mediacomponents
Media Components
Figure 4: Amino acid concentration comparison of ball mill and pin mill media.
Figure 5
Analytical
Analytical Comparison Comparison
of Ball-Milled of Ball-Milled
and Pin-Milled and Media
Cell Culture
Pin-Milled Cell Culture Media
120
CM Batch
115 SSPM Batch
of ball-milled
110
Ball-Milled
105
100
Percentof
95
Percent
90
85
80
nc
e
2
e
in
id
vin
id
B1
in
Ac
Zi
m
ox
fla
ia
in
a
l ic
Th
rid
tin
m
ib
Fo
Py
ta
ico
R
Vi
N
Media
M edia components
Components
Figure 5: Vitamin and zinc concentration comparison of ball mill and pin mill media.
www.safcbiosciences.com
Biological Comparison culture longevity and antibody production in EX-CELL™ CD
CHO media produced via ball milling and pin milling. Figures
A cell culture comparison of ball-milled and pin-milled media
6, 7 and 8 demonstrate that there are no differences in
was performed with the CHO cell line B13-24, a derivative of
growth, viability or IgG production between the media.
the DX-B11 line which secretes humanized immunoglobulin
IgG. The studies evaluated cell growth over multiple passages,
Figure 6
Cell
C omparison of Growth
Grow th ofComparison
D X-B 11 C ellsof
in Ball-Milled and
B all-milled and Pin-
Pin-Milled Cell Culture
milled EX-C E LL C D C H O MediaMedia
3.50E + 06
100
3.00E + 06
Celldensity/mL
cells
Density/m L
2.50E + 06 80
V iable cells
2.00E + 06 60
viable
1.50E + 06
40
%%
Cell
1.00E + 06
20
5.00E + 05
0.00E + 00 0
P ass 1 P ass 2 P ass 3 P ass 4 P ass 5
Passage
P a ssa ge
Figure 7
Longevity
Comparison Comparison
of Longevity of Cells
of DX-B11 Cells in Ball-Milled
in Ball-Milled and
and Pin-Milled
Pin-Milled
EX-CELL CD Cell
CHOCulture
Media Media
4.00E+06
100
3.50E+06
Celldensity/mL
cells
3.00E+06 80
Density/m L
Viable cells
2.50E+06
60
%%viable
2.00E+06
1.50E+06 40
Cell
1.00E+06
20
5.00E+05
0.00E+00 0
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9
Passage
Pa ssa ge
Ball-Milled CM SSPM
www.safcbiosciences.com
Figure 8
Production
C o m p ariso n o f Gro w Comparison
th o f D X -B 11 of Cells
C ells in Bin Ball-Milled
all-m ille d an d Pand
in -
Pin-Milled Cell Culture Media
m ille d E X -C E L L C D C H O M ed ia
3.50E + 06
100
3.00E + 06
density/mL
V iab lecells
Den sity/m 2.50E + 06 80
cell
2.00E + 06 60
viable
1.50E + 06
40
Cell
%%
1.00E + 06
Cell
20
5.00E + 05
0.00E + 00 0
P as s 1 P as s 2 P as s 3 P as s 4 P as s 5
Passage
P a ssa ge
www.safcbiosciences.com
Particle Size Comparison differences in particle size distribution do exist, does not affect
other finished product testing such as solubility, pH or
The particle size distribution of EX-CELL™ CD CHO media
osmolality, and does not result in any difference in the
produced in the CM, SSPM and in a ball mill was compared
performance of the media on cells.
for informational purposes and is shown in Figure 9.
Figure 9
SSPM
(Mean value = 35.5 µm)
CM
(Mean value = 33.4µm)
Ball-Milled
(Mean value = 41.1µm)
Figure 9: Particle size distribution curves of ball mill and pin mill media.
www.safcbiosciences.com
Warranty, Limitation of Remedies
SAFC Biosciences warrants to the purchaser for a period of one year from date of delivery that this product conforms to
its specifications. Other terms and conditions of this warranty are contained in SAFC Biosciences’ written warranty, a
copy of which is available upon request. ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED
WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE EXCLUDED. In no case will SAFC
Biosciences be liable for any special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of this product or the use of this
product by the customer or any third party based upon breach of warranty, breach of contract, negligence, strict tort,
or any other legal theory. SAFC Biosciences expressly disclaims any warranty against claims by any third party by way of
infringement or the like. THIS PRODUCT IS INTENDED FOR PURPOSES DESCRIBED ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR
ANY HUMAN OR THERAPEUTIC USE.
Additional Terms and Conditions are contained in the product Catalog, a copy of which is available upon request.