Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INTRODUCTION
Whenever I, or any people for that matter, browse through literature pertaining to
gender studies, identity politics and even philosophy, I always have difficulty looking for
texts that center on lesbianism. I believe the lack of available resources reflect and, to a
regarding the issues faced by lesbians today. In my everyday search for lesbian
representation, I have come to the realization that the media has come a long way in
integrating homosexuals in its industry. Unfortunately, it appears that the lesbian receives
far less exposure, if not, entirely in the background, as compared to gay men. It is a
challenge to collect fragments of the lesbian culture in the form of articles, films, and TV
show DVDs. And I have always found this difficulty to be deeply rooted on the fact that
the lesbian lifestyle is simply not receiving the ample attention it deserves. This is could
be, on the one hand, due to the tendency of lesbians to be silent members of society. As a
result, the silence of lesbians has led to an over-all hushing of their lives including the
As such, this thesis will discuss the dilemma lesbians1 encounter based on their
I will be able to supply a substantial account on a subject that deserves further attention in
academic discourses.
One of the concerns of this paper is anchored on the claim that lesbians are
confronted with the issue of double displacement due to their sex and gender. Sex is
generically defined as the biological birth category of a person as male or female. This
1
The term lesbian in its most basic sense refers to a female who identifies the same sex as the
object of her desire and sexual preference. Lesbian gender per se is a patchwork of masculine and feminine
qualities which the lesbian reinforces and chooses to manifest as part of her identity and lifestyle.
2
category has become the basis of societies in socially constructing and naturalizing
gender as masculine or feminine. Sex is far more stable than gender in the sense that the
former is physically confined. Gender is a social construct that has developed to become
identities aside from the masculine and the feminine.2 Sex and gender distinctions are
further standardized and reinforced through roles, social beliefs, and practices. In order to
address the issue of double displacement, this project shall gear towards the attainment of
a higher social good in the form of gender justice. This goes to say that the central task of
goal of any intellectual endeavor that wishes to solve the issues a particular gender faces.
The paper suggests a scholarly activist stance. As such, the feasibility of the
gender-just society is plausible if and only if the lesbian can first overcome the myths or
To clearly establish the project this thesis wishes to pursue, Chapter One will
familiarize the reader with the context/issues in which the lesbian is situated. It will
include a review of the status of women and Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transsexual, and
Queer (GLBTQ) communities in different societies. Afterwards, I shall also discuss the
Feminist Theory versus Lesbian Theory, I am to purport that feminism which has claimed
2
ABC of Women Worker’s Rights and Gender Equality, (Geneva: ILO, 2000), 3.
3
praxis.
Chapter Two is devoted in laying down arguments that will support the claim that
double displacement exists. This will be done by investigating how the lesbian is
discriminated, repressed, and misplaced via the various institutions of society. I would
consequently tackle the ways in which the lesbian is viewed and identified within the
public sphere in order to understand the root of her difficulties and passivity in addressing
Chapter Two will also discuss how the male-female and masculine-feminine
binary categories became the primary point from which a society institutionalizes
heterosexuality as the norm of gender relation and identity. In doing so, individuals are
raised and trained to conform to their particular sex and gender designations. Moreover,
the need to procreate will be used to justify heteronormativity. This is an assumption that
preservation entity that maintains social order. A society makes it imperative to strictly
conform to the gender categories one is placed in view of the assumption that being
heterosexual is normal and necessary. One who does not fit within this gender framework
would be considered as a deviant, a rebel, or even abnormal. Failure to obey by the rules
of gender identification would lead to dire consequences. The lesbian therefore, being
both female and homosexual, inherits the afflictions of both categories. As a result of this
scenario, achieving a collective lesbian identity and a free gendered self becomes
obscure.
4
displacement and how it is to be placed as the absolute end to be attained. As such, it falls
under the strand of socio-political philosophy which is concerned with the normative
aspect of addressing social ends and issues. By the time the reader reaches this
concluding chapter, he/she would have presumably understood that the different forms of
of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Humanist Feminists and gender theorists are
currently choosing this general normative framework in analyzing the issue of gender
equality and justice. The Capability Approach, though still in the stage of becoming a full
blown theory of social justice, can be used to construct the conditions needed to for
gender-just society. Needless to say, this thesis shall ground its solution on positive
The applicability of gender justice in this thesis will be limited to civil societies
that have already accommodated a liberal stance. The category of lesbian and
homosexual should be first presented in the said society. Furthermore, it must be noted
that the concepts applied here are feasible within the context of Western and Western-
influenced states wherein there is conscious presence of gendered institutions and human
rights.
5
Before I am to inquire the issue of double displacement, one must first recognize
the social reality in which it is embedded. As such, this chapter will aim to familiarize the
reader with the landscape that this thesis would be working on. I have also opted to
praxis. Although there are a lot of disciplines that engage in studying lesbianism, it is the
feminist that had served as arbiter in such discourse. As mentioned in the introduction,
this chapter contextualizes the problem of lesbians as individuals and as part of the Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual, Transsexual and Queer3 (GLBTQ) community. I must reiterate that
background discussions for any work that pertains to gender is indispensable. This is in
The following section will consist of brief reports that aim to highlight the status
of gender liberation on different continental locations. The lesbian is, in the succeeding
paragraphs, discussed as part of the homosexual community and the women sector. After
we have seen her position in different scenarios, we will be able to discuss the lesbian
quasi-independently.
3
The term gay is used in this thesis exclusively refers to homosexual males. The term lesbian as
clarified in the introduction is the homosexual female whose gender and sex is both considered inferior.
Bisexuals are individuals whose object of desire can shift from male to female and vice versa. Transsexuals
on the other hand, are people who have decided to alter their sex to coincide with their gender preference.
The term queer refers to individuals who do not wish to categorize themselves using the usual gender
categories.
6
The United States (US) is considered to be the most advanced in the process of
advocacy groups. In comparison to other states, the gays and lesbians in the US tend to
actively participate in political and social dialogues. Their values and attitudes tend to
focus more on the individual, rather than what society dictates or perceive as correct.
Furthermore, it could be traced in their history that US gays and lesbians are the pioneers
in demanding for equal civil liberties and most especially in the alleviation, if not the full
York City, where gays protested against the use of brutal force of abusive police officers
while raiding gay bars.4 This momentous event in gay history became the launching pad
for GLBTQ advocacy. The entry of lesbians in the GLBT movement5 soon followed in
the early ‘70s as part of the second wave of feminists. Afterwards, these second wave
Simone De Beauvoir entitled “The Second Sex,” and the highly angered article of
Despite the head start, lesbians and gays in the US are still subject to rightwing-
4
Andre Reding, Sexual Orientation and Human Rights in the Americas, (New York:World Policy
Institute, 2003), 89.
5
Individuals who considered themselves in the category of “queer” were not yet recognized
during this time.
6
Marilyn Pearsall, Women and Values: Readings in Recent Feminist Philosophy, 3rded.
(Belmont:Wadsworth Publishing Company,1999), 2-3.
7
individuals, through legislations that suppress gender justice. Despite public dissent, the
“Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy of the US military, which inhibits gays and lesbians from
serving the army as “out” soldiers, is still being implemented. On the other hand,
majority of Bible Belt states in the US do not tolerate GLBTQ behavior particularly in
recognizing same-sex unions, except for some parts of Florida who recently amended
their local legislations acknowledging same-sex civil unions. Furthermore, there are no
laws that protect gays and lesbians against hate crimes in more than half of federal states
the country.
Despite initial efforts in demanding for equal civil liberties, it is still not enough
to assume that “gender revolution,” as American scholars coined the term for the
liberation and equality of both sexes, is over. Although it can be asserted that women
have been able to infiltrate various fronts of society, a lot of feminists argue that the truth
of this is exclusively centered on White middle class women, and to other races and
The role of women, in general, is still in question mainly because of their sex and
gender. This has been manifested in various organizations and companies who are still
able to elude from the laws that should have been able to protect women. Laws, which
were supposedly aimed at protecting women at work, are not being fully implemented.
Some women are not hired, given less income and benefits, or easily terminated primarily
because of the assumption that as women, they could not properly do their work as good
One of the fundamental cultural markers related to gender in South and Latin
America revolves around the machismo culture, the Latin American concept of hyper-
masculinity. Machismo culture refers to the overall cultural structure of the Latin
Americans such that it adheres, not only to the patriarchal system of its society, but most
importantly in the attitudes and values related to extreme masculism. Machista ethics
solidly describes the attitudes and values of the male species: sexually-aggressive,
domineering, and has high regard for the male-dominated society. Its ideals are further
Reding:
individuals, but not the sexual acts that these homosexuals engage in.
However, homosexuals do not deny the fact that these sexual acts, or
if the “act” is different from those who commit them, there would still
sin because the act cannot be separated from the person. Given the
need for the homosexual to abstain him or herself from sexual acts
7
Andre Reding, Sexual Orientation and Human Rights in the Americas, 7.
9
with the same sex, there is always the question of whether this would
hinder his or her capability to live freely in coherence with his identity.
because lesbian relations are invisible in their cultural fiber.8 And since
less threat in society. Despite such indistinct behavior, there is still the
culture.
On the other hand, Latino culture also imbibe the way of thinking
their society. Lesbians are also abused by their own family members
crimes are, most of the time, seen as private disputes, rather than
8
Ibid, 16.
9
Thompson, Becky. interview, Maria Trinidad Gutierrez and the Mexican Lesbian and Gay
Movement, in Sojourner: The Women’s Forum, Vol. 21, No. 10 (30 June 1996), 13.
10
culture.
American, and Carribean states since colonial times. With this, the
single, then she becomes a part and an object of the game called
women in the workforce and the public sphere. In fact, the labor arena
working conditions, cheaper labor cost, longer working hours, and too
11
homosexual laws for gays and lesbians.10 Recently, it has also begun to
suffice to conclude that Canada is the archetype for the future gender-
complacent over the existence of these laws, such that they lack the
realized.
10
Andre Reding, Sexual Orientation and Human Rights in the Americas, 126.
12
homosexual tolerance behavior and found out that the Dutch were the
11
Jonathan Kelley, Attitudes towards Homosexuals in 29 nations, in www.international-
survey.org/A_Soc_M/Homosex_ASM_v4_n1.pdf, accessed on November 1, 2001.
12
Samuel Cox, Division Report: Gender-related Violence. United Nations Commission on
Human rights. 2000.
13
Dragana Vuckovic, Discrimination against Lesbians and gays in Siberia 2006, in
http://www.labris.org.yu/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=136&Itemid=48, accessed on
August 16, 2007.
13
settle the dispute and avoid “attracting too much attention.”14 The
terminated from their respective jobs on the assumption that they are
businesses fire lesbians on the pretext that they do not meet specific
the fact that women who are not married in their 30s are assumed to
have lack emotional stability, and thus may affect their ability to
Law of the Republic of Siberia, which clearly states that any act of any
there is much belief that women are, to a large extent, open for
14
Ibid.
15
Ibid.
14
for those bisexuals and femmes. Although filed, these cases are often
harassed and raped, the women wanted it. Such thinking prevails in
were murdered by straight men after attending the first ever “Pride
categorizing such act as murder, the suspects were charged with hate
Zambia, gays and lesbians are legally prosecuted under the state’s
“…If anybody promotes gay rights after this statement, the law will take its course. We
need to protect public morality. Human rights do not operate in a vacuum.”17 True to such
words, the police were given instructions to arrest men and women who support
homosexuals or are actual gays and lesbians.18 Moreover, the government continued
supporting the organization Zambia Against People with Abnormal Sexual Acts
(ZAPASA), which aimed to fight against homosexuals. The same situation is widespread
By virtue of being women, African lesbians would inherit the same faith from its
patriarchal society as they are considered to be second class citizens. Because of their
dominant male culture, women are also not given equal access to medical treatment. In
the rise of poverty in the continent, women and lesbians alike are chosen to be the
primary recipients of the burden, which includes limited access to: education, media,
society ensures the worse treatment for lesbians than for gays, particularly on the lack of
16
Stefano Fabeni, “The Violations of the Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender
Persons in ZAMBIA”, International Gay and Human Rights Commission Report, (July 2007), 2. The term
‘women’ is not interpreted by the Zambian government as pertaining to lesbians. The law takes a default
male perspective.
17
Ibid.
18
The lesbian was initially not part of the law persecuting individuals who practice homosexuality.
The original Zambian law stated that men who will engage in homosexual acts would be subject to fourteen
years imprisonment. The involvement of lesbians in the police hunt was de facto in nature and should not
have been covered by legislature. As such it could be deemed as an illegal arrest with no due justification.
16
laws that protect gays and lesbians from discrimination. Although India has a law
particularly against gay relations, it is seldom implemented but instead utilized for
extortion, abuse, and threat. This law excludes lesbian relationships, hence lesbians are
considered to be an invalid gender in the country. This makes our case of displacement a
bigger issue, because of India’s ignorance, rather than the actual act of abuse.
Like African women, Indian women, who are not part of the cosmopolitan cities
of India, are also subject to second class citizenship and unfair treatment. This includes
the practice of “son-preference,” where the son is the more preferred sex by society’s
standards. For this reason, there is a high mortality rate for female children due to the low
allocation of family resources for them particularly in the following aspects: food,
The Dowry System also reinforces the belief that women are considered to be
expenditures by fathers. In this system, the father of the bride is required to give “dowry,”
in money or in kind, to the family of the groom. With this, Indians view their women as a
liability to their family because of the need to give expensive dowry during marriage,
countries.19 If this holds true, then lesbians and gays maintain a social
19
Jonathan Kelley, Attitudes towards Homosexuals.
17
physical violence towards gay men and lesbians are infrequent in the
middle class lesbians do not often find the need to pursue further legal
the butch. In the Philippines, gays and lesbians are able to gain the
result, organizations such as Can’t Live Inside the Closet (CLIC) and the
through an interview with Anna Leah Sarabia, the founder of CLIC, that
parts of the globe such that these travesties and subjugation directed
political, and cultural inequalities based on their sex and gender, while
After setting the status quo and context from which this project
launches itself from, I shall move to the second part of this chapter
lesbianism has been crucial in such a way that its ideas had a huge
Feminist thought has claimed authority over discussions and inquiry of lesbianism
by virtue of their aim, which is concerned with the issues of “womanity.” Given its
nature, lesbianism cannot separate itself from feminism entirely, although there is a need
to set boundaries in which the two converges. With this, I will identify the limits of doing
a feminist approach on the issues of lesbians, and their interpretation of the lesbian
identity, particularly focusing on identifying some of the errors of feminist theories about
the lesbian. I shall pursue this in order to avoid the same flaws in posing the problem of
she would find herself unsuitable to the description and identity articulated by its initial
After analyzing the available resource materials, it appears that there is no clear-
arguing what constitutes the very term. For the sake of clarity, feminism will be defined
here in its most general sense: a movement that is comprised of social, political, and
cultural praxes, advocacies, and philosophies that aims to understand and eradicate the
confined to the tasks of conceptual analysis and discourse. It has literally become a
philosophy in action, in the sense that the philosophizing of women, about women, has
led to the creation of a political advocacy that aims not only in telling us what is wrong,
and what we ought to do. Actually, it has been devised to set out and show us how they
think it should be done. To understand the issues of feminist thinking, as well as its action
driven face outside of the academe, I will briefly trace the evolution of the said discipline.
This would allow one to see where feminism is coming from, and why it is what it is,
before laying down its main tenets regarding society, women, and the lesbian.
The thoughts, ideas, and history of feminism are best spoken through the three
waves in which feminist thought is said to have occurred. The aforementioned waves are
generally reflected from the formulation of a feminist agenda within the US and Europe.
21
Marilyn Pearsall, Women and Values: Readings in Recent Feminist Philosophy, 3rded.
(Belmont:Wadsworth Publishing Company,1999), 1
20
However, I attempted to diffuse and decontextualize such ideas in order to address gender
It has been said that feminist thinking was given a figure during the 18th century
through the now classic 1792 work of Mary Wollstonecraft entitled “A Vindication of the
Rights of Women.” It demanded for the political liberation of women through equal
political and social rights with men who were then considered to be the only eligible
participants in the public sphere. At the same time, it was also the start of feminist
activity in the US and United Kingdom in order to gain the right of suffrage for women.
It can be said that the first wave of feminism is a liberal one, which centered on gaining
entry into state institutions while gaining political and official recognition as the able
counterpart of the male. It is also during this time that women began to argue against the
notion of rational inferiority, thus demanding for equal access to education and civil
liberties.22 Interestingly, it was only during the arrival of the second wave feminism that
The first wave feminist activity geared its agenda towards acquiring the right to
vote and some privileges awarded only to men. It centered on attacking the de jure
(official) means like the law and other state policies that oppresses women. As compared
to the first, the second wave feminism takes the issue of de facto means in which gender
oppressive society is able to maintain itself. This is intertwined with the desire to
eliminate practices that reinforce male dominance of various social activities and
relations. Second wave feminists still saw the importance of the first wave feminist
contributions. However, they sought to eradicate both sources of inequality (de jure and
22
Giltraud Schuvik, The Birth of the Woman:An Introduction to Feminism, (New York: Basic
Books,1993), 8-9
21
The second wave of feminism began shortly after the World War II, with the
appearance of Simone De Beauvoir’s “The Second Sex.” This became the turning point
for the shift of the conceptual framework of feminism from a discussion of equality
towards a discussion of freedom. Her claim, that “women could not be equal, could not
be anything but the second sex until they are free to change themselves and their
conditions,”23 was so powerful that it became the starting point and argument for
succeeding feminist theories, as compared to the aim of feminists’ agenda during the first
wave.
Also during the second wave, that feminism penetrated and aroused the interests
of the American and European public of the 70s, it began to split itself from within.
Feminist thought no longer became a unified understanding of the woman and her
condition instead different views began to give birth to different interpretations and
solutions. For example, the liberals continued to pursue a path to civil liberties as the
primary means to attain freedom and equality. Meanwhile, radical feminists proposed a
program of absolute separatism from all things male, getting back women power by
starting a social revolution. For the Marxist feminist, they believed that all oppression,
like gender oppression, was all rooted in the economic rule of the privileged that required
a revolution overthrowing the bourgeoisie. I would have to say that I disagree with the
system and theory of liberation proposed by the radicals and the Marxist feminist. On the
other hand, I find the liberal stance inadequate when it espoused a change in certain
institutional policies alone. At the most, I would more likely side with the humanists who
23
Marilyn Pearsall, Women and Values: Readings in Recent Feminist Philosophy, 2
22
utilized an existential and third wave feminist thought, in the form of “feminisms,” which
however, that despite the fact of having belonged to the third wave feminism,
“feminisms” refuse to associate themselves with it and instead be associated with the
Third wave feminism refers to the fusion of the different strands of feminism. It
liberation across cultures unlike feminism, which imposes its view, analysis, and
quo of the community. It also recognizes that the cause of gender oppression may be
impossible to find. They do not attempt to engage on history or patriarchy as the sole root
of all evils.
women, I prefer the coming together of different form of feminisms. The claim for
gender justice should not subscribe to universality. Rather, one should view that certain
just inequalities could validly exist in societies with internal and external
The third wave of feminism consists of various types, which sprung from the
critiques made by their predecessors, such as the following: black feminist, lesbian
feminist, postmodern feminist, ecofeminist and the mind boggling post-post feminism
23
feminist. Third wave feminism claimed that second wave feminism made a mistake by
proposing a myth of a unified woman. Black feminists, for example, found that feminist
thinking during the 70s and 80s were insensitive to the needs and causes of the Blacks. In
fact, feminism during the aforementioned period was deemed to be applicable only to the
In their attempt to alleviate gender oppression, radicals and liberalists alike were
unable to consider how the issue crossed path with other means of oppression. They were
criticized for making it seem that the primary problem for any woman would be her
subordination to men. On the contrary, poverty stricken women argue that gender
subordination would be the least of their problems. The Black woman, for example, as
Bell Hooks claimed, would rather identify her oppression as a Black woman in a White
most part of her life was subjected to this racial distinction rather than her sex. She further
criticized the possibility of providing a feminist theory that would represent all women as
she emphasized that, “it is not enough to claim that all women are oppressed and sexism
renders suffering that cannot be measured as the justification to say that a common bond
Most women, who do not belong to the same social strata as the traditional
American feminists, would find it difficult to reconcile their experience of sexism and
patriarchy from the ones mentioned in the written works of these thinkers. It is necessary
to consider that an affiliation to a different race, or a gender preference, could easily lead
to a whole different view of the world, unlike the second wave feminist that hastily
24
Bell Hooks, Feminist Theory:From Margin to Center, (South End Express, 1984), Woman and
Values:Readings in Recent Feminist Philosophy, 3rded. (Belmont:Wadsworth Publishing Company,1999),
26-29.
24
generalized the female into a universal category of woman. They also assumed that the
virtue of having the woman as its central concern. Surely this has some truth to it, but
only to an extent that the lesbian is born with the sexed body of a female and to the extent
as well that she suffers certain symptoms of oppression based on her birth sex. I shall
now render the appraisal of feminist theories on lesbians in this concluding sub-section.
This will also be used as an opener to the discussion of double displacement in Chapter
Two.
When Sigmund Freud published his medical work in 1920 entitled, “The
speculated that homosexuality in men and women may well be a case of narcissism.
negative oedipal complex, wherein the mother is naturally the original love object of a
lesbian female. But instead of the desire shifting to the father as the object, the girl (the
daughter) retains her love for her mother.25 Furthermore, Freud asserted that lesbians who
adopt the pseudo-male role is the girl who is unable to shed the masculine component of
her personality and resolve her penis envy. Thus, out of anger and jealousy to her father
25
Janet Shibley Hyde, Lesbianism and Bisexuality, in Half the Human Experience: the Psychology
of Women, 3rd ed. (D.C, Health and Company, 1985), 306.
25
and to other males, such issues were resolved through mimicry of men who possess what
This was the scenario at the time when feminism decided to take lesbianism under
its wing, with a goal to retort against the accusation of lesbianism as a disease that infects
the minds of women during the 1960s and 70s. For some time, the term “lesbian” was
even used to insult women and regard them as psychologically abnormal individuals.
This was used as a justification to send them to mental institutions. Women, who defied
certain gender prescriptions, exhibited desire to perform masculine identified acts, and
even those who found comfort in wearing pants were accused of being lesbians. The
feminists of the 70s, who aimed at resolving this stereotyping, claimed that male
supremacy viewed lesbianism with so such stigma out of insecurity and fear of having
Also during the 70s, radicalesbians27 who coined the term woman-identified-
desperate attempt to keep women in their place, such that women would continue to
portray the role of the subordinate dependent on man. Accordingly, the clamor for
equality produced a lesbian concept contrary to the assigned inferior category of women.
This idea further flourished when radical feminists integrated the work of Simone De
Beauvoir in the “Second Sex.” There was a shift in thinking that when De Beauvoir
claimed that “the woman could not be equal, could not be anything but the second sex,
until she is free to change to themselves and their conditions.” From an argument of
26
Ibid, 309.
27
Marilyn Pearsall, Women and Values, 32
26
also emphasized the view that lesbianism is a form of rebellion from the current
conditions of the woman as the other. Hence, it comes as no surprise that the feminists
during that time embraced the lesbian as a woman who is the most free due to her refusal
to relate with men, to be fixed within a domineering system of heterosexuality, and her
It is understandable that the hype of the 70s Gender Revolution gave birth to an
aggressive feminist voice demanding for change. This was the initial phase of lesbian
feminism that overwhelmed feminists of the possible promise the lesbians offer. In
looking at the various texts on lesbianism during this era of feminist thought, one would
be able to see how the latter saw the lesbian as the ideal needed to overcome patriarchy.
At the onset of Charlotte Bunch’s essay entitled “Lesbians in Revolt,” one could clearly
see the echoing of anger against the current system of her time and how she, together
In short, lesbianism was regarded as a “choice” the woman should take in order to
liberate her self from the clutches of male domination. Although most of the feminists
28
Ibid, 4-6.
29
Louise Hamilton, Mlle De Beauvoir: “A Synopsis and Analysis of the Second Sex”,
Femwrytsfem, December 2001 available from www.femwrytsfem.com/article/23892; internet, accessed
July 2007.
30
Charlotte Bunch, “Lesbian’s in Revolt”, In Lesbianism and the Women’s movement, (Diana
Press, 1975)
27
today no longer adopt such a view, a strand of radical feminist thought continued to
promote the lesbian choice as the exercise of absolute freedom. Even if lesbians are
unconscious of the political value of their gender preference, they also continued to be
On the other hand, Julia Penelope implied in her work that a lesbian’s choice to
own a deviant gender identity entails that she should be conscious of the consequences
and negative responses towards her identity. She argued, for example, that choosing to
adopt the Butch-Femme, which further explained in the next Chapters, roles could
relations of male and female as the norm of which they must copy. 32 The Butch-Femme
role depicts the lesbian as the true woman, a view that for me is a myth as it focuses
merely on the aspect of these sexed bodies and directing their desires towards the woman.
Moreover, one does not allow the lesbian to be but instead treats her as a tool, a
condition, and a model to be reproduced. Ironically, the lesbian’s concept and possession
of freedom becomes vague, if not suspicious, when individuals form a frame of what
lesbianism ought to be, without considering the fact that being free also entails the need
to adopt the masculine identity. It is far more powerful for the lesbian to claim the
masculine role and deconstruct it to become “the butch.” It doesn’t necessarily have to be
mimic manly characteristics if masculinity is considered as a social construct and that the
Separatism, or the separation of men and women, has been viewed by Charlotte
Bunch as a solution to eradicate patriarchy. Despite calls to overthrow men from their
31
Julia Penelope, “Heteropatriarchal Semantics and Lesbian Identity: The ways a Lesbian can be”,
in Call Me Lesbian: Lesbian Lives, Lesbian theory, (Freedom, CA: Crossing Press, 1992)
32
Ibid, 78-97
28
privileged position, society would still prefer the current oppressive structure. In my
women. This is primarily because I do not see men as enemies to be annihilated, despite
not exist if all women adapt a woman-identified-woman position. It blinds the fact that
even lesbians would refuse to see themselves as the totality of womanhood, despite
assertions of the radical lesbians during the 70s. Some consider themselves women only
as far as their genitals go, but if feminists truly value respect and right to self-
determination, they must not force their ideology on lesbians. It is highly questionable
that feminists deemed lesbian issues as a mere matter of ignorance and instead,
considerably blame patriarchy again in the process for instilling the notion of masculinity.
disagree with the position that radical lesbian feminists declare in confronting the issue.
This is because these feminists failed to give a stable rational argument to challenge the
system and instead opted to target the male per se. Furthermore, they overlooked the fact
that males are also subject to certain repressions and regulations in terms of gender. It
would be a backfire solution to adopt a system that would seek to liberate women on the
account of men becoming the oppressed. I will further discuss and elaborate the idea of
the lesbian as the authentic self Chapters Two and the need to assert her active
that exists between experiencing women subordination and lesbian subordination, since
the latter has to face the problem of being identified, not only as woman, but as a
not necessarily follow that in order to change the condition of all women, she must act on
individuals possessing a different gendered-self. The masculine and the feminine should
falls upon the lesbian based on her sex and gender. This definition is derived when one
affirms the fact that a lesbian cannot fully set aside her sex by occupying a gender
subordination and women subjugation, which I will further discuss in this Chapter.
to the plight women faced by virtue of being women. The problem simply is that women,
since time immemorial, were considered secondary to men. The issue of how humans
were subdivided up to form sexes is another issue that has yet to be settled through time.
be through de jure (official) or institutional means. Repression can exist even in silence
through the various social practices. More often than not, some lesbian opt to act straight
in order to avail of certain heterosexual privileges such as: special treatment in standing
room only movie houses and public transportation, availing sick leaves, and more
importantly in public debates and discourses where women, despite their harsh opinion,
are still regarded with respect because of their sex. There is no direct assault on the
lesbian, but she is conditioned to compromise her gender identity in order to avail of the
normalizes repression, lesbians who are exposed to the patterns set by social norms and
gendered institutions would, in the long run, accept the status quo without complaints.
31
oppression because a lesbian possesses a gendered identity with certain implications and
consequences for the individual and her external relations. Unfortunately, gender
oppression, as a whole, tends to be centered on the conflict of two sets of gender, the
masculine and the feminine, where the latter is viewed as the losing party. As a result,
solving gender oppression becomes more heterosexual in nature and often ignores non-
The lesbian is, by default, a sexed entity. She only captures the category of a
woman by virtue of her being born with a vagina. This becomes the basis of her growth,
while imbibing the feminine role and the subsequent performances, or performative acts,
necessary to continually affirm the nature of her sex. A salient act in maintaining her
“woman” status is the necessity to desire the opposite sex. In leaving this feature behind,
the lesbian loses her ownership of a stable, coherent and socially-acceptable identity.
Feminists have interpreted this as a good thing, such that she does not have to conform to
However, a “gendered concerned act” occurs when a lesbian re-directs her desires
from the male to the female, thus maintaining the burden of her sex. Even if she does not
want to be with a man, she will not be able to free herself from the implications of her
sex. Whether or not the lesbian accepts her female body as hers, and refuses to see her
body compatible with the gender she chooses to assume, she cannot deny that society
would still perceive her as a woman. The general “conservative” public would subject her
to certain standards and norms applicable to that of a woman, whether she would be keen
on accepting it or not.
32
Cheshire Calhoun claimed that gay and lesbian subordination should be treated as
subjugation of women from men alone, there is good reason to maintain the separation of
gay and lesbian subordination from that of gender oppression. Thus, this would prove to
be insufficient in painting the picture of lesbian identity. And because of this, there is a
Feminists thinkers has conveniently used and unused the dualism of the sex and
gender of a person when speaking of the subordination and identity of the lesbian. They
have often sided with the view that being a lesbian would leave out the consequences of
being female. Although Calhoun’s ideas are acceptable, I consider the concept of dualism
… Tootsie roll metaphysics or pop-bead metaphysics is simply wrong. It is not true that
each part of my identity is separable from each other part, and the significance of each
part is unaffected by other parts.34
This trend of thought implies that sex does have an effect on the gendered identity
of the lesbian, although the demands and consequences a lesbian face extremely varies
from the heterosexual woman’s absorption of her sex. Feminists like Monique Wittig
emphasized too much on gender, thus led her to set aside the sex of lesbians. This can be
seen in her claim that lesbians are “not-woman,”35 a shift from the “woman-identified-
33
Cheshire Calhoun, Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet, (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2000), 75-76
34
Cheshire Calhoun, “The Gender Closet, in Women and Values”, Readings in Recent Feminist
Philosophy, 3rded. (Belmont:Wadsworth Publishing Company,1999), 194.
35
Ibid, 46.
33
exclusion of the lesbians from the binary scheme of gender and sex. In highlighting the
difference of the heterosexual from the homosexual, I suppose her not-woman claim
failed to recognize the other features that could qualify the lesbian in the category of
woman. By addressing only the issues of gender, she missed out the experience of lesbian
displacement based on her sex. As a result, the lesbian is still subject to oppression.
I do not wish to deny that Calhoun’s and Wittig’s claim that the lesbian, in terms
of her sexuality, is far more concerned with her subordination and displacement,
primarily because of the heterosexual norm of society rather than the disadvantages of
being a woman. However, I wish to correct the implication that this is her only plight.
The lesbian inside the closet may repress her true identity by prescribing to a feminine
imagery of being heterosexual in the eyes of society. However, I cannot see the
oppression from the heterosexual camp. If one truly views gender as a social construct,
then one must, to a large extent, resist the temptation of looking at femininity and
The following section deals with the issue of some, if not most of, lesbians who
an insignificant minority rather than a key sector that can shape society. This can be
partially attributed to the fact that a lot of lesbians would choose to keep their gendered
identities private. Because of this, lack of visibility would further drive society not to
34
recognize and adjust its structure in order to accommodate the presence of the lesbian
community.
matter would not be a problem. However in the present state lesbians are in, their
“Heterosexualized media” of social information aid in regulating the image of the lesbian
in a society. The lesbian today is offered some connections with her gendered identity
through programs that are aimed for consumers like her. This current trend of GLBTQ
double displacement. I shall discuss this issue in the subsection entitled “Lesbian Images
and Categories as means of Objectification” I would then proceed to the outlaw role of
Recognizing Oppression
whether or not the latter would exist with or without the recognition of the lesbian (or any
individual for that matter) of being oppressed. A lack of recognition from those who are
I am inclined to respect choices since I believe that this is one of the essential
powers which place human beings above any other species. There is difficulty in
justifying the existence of gender oppression if people who are oppressed deny being in
such a situation. However, I could not just allow myself to go forth with a thesis that
35
included studying the oppressive situation of the lesbian if in the first place the lesbian
One of the features of being oppressed is the absence of choices.36 The lesbian
manifestation of an act of society against her. She will not feel oppressed unless someone
actually harasses her by virtue of her being a lesbian. One of the reasons why the lesbian
oppression are highly subjective. It boils down to whether or not a lesbian is a direct or
merely an indirect victim of homophobia and discrimination. Historically the lesbian has
never felt the absolute absence of choices. In fact there has neither been a law anywhere
in the world nor in history that proclaimed being lesbian as illegal, unlike the homosexual
man who has been more exposed to discrimination and persecution of institutions.
Differences in the ordeal of gay men and lesbians in the past can be one of the major
factors that shaped these groups’ approach to liberation today. A hypothesis rendered by
Sen regarding gender oppression can be seen as a plausible explanation for this
society that normalizes inequality and oppression, they (in this case the lesbians and
women), tend to adopt such normality as natural and not merely as a social construct.
In the case of gender oppression, I suppose there was a point in time that there
deemed to be the privilege of any person. This is the reason why “displacement” rather
than “oppression” is the more appropriate term to describe the situation of lesbians. There
36
Bell Hooks, “Black Women:Shaping Feminist Theory”, in Women and Values, 3rded.
(Belmont:Wadsworth Publishing Company,1999), 27
37
Atty. Allan Pasamonte, Lecture Handout: Philosophy of Law, 1st semester AY 2005-1006,
University of the Philippines, Los Banos
36
direct acts against lesbians. More often than not, lesbians experience unjust inequalities in
the form of withheld privileges. One may continue to pursue a project of liberation
very reason that there are essential bases for the existence of these disparities. Institutions
fundamentally on being rational and free human beings. The lesbian qualifies in such
category and she should not be situated outside of the system based solely on her gender
choices. For as long as she does not become detrimental to the state and others, there is
Gender choices are personal exercises of freedom. A lesbian does not hold any
obligation to marry, form a family with a husband and adopt a subordinate feminine role.
If she chooses to portray a heterosexual life because of the necessity to avail certain
such, the lesbian finds the need to deny her own identity for convenience and acceptance.
On the other hand, if a lesbian chooses to be with a man simply because this becomes her
preference, then she must be allowed to do so. The goal of the state is to safeguard the
positive freedom of its constituents, at the same time, make sure that just limitations are
still a need to guarantee that the tenets of justice are being upheld. If a lesbian does not
want to avail herself of certain privileges then it is her choice, albeit such privileges
The body becomes sexed and gendered the moment a child is born and the doctor
proclaims that it’s a girl or a boy depending on the genitals attached to it.38 It is true today
that even sex can be considered as an undetermined aspect of one’s being. Due to the
advancement in technology, a person can now choose to reconfigure the body in order to
fit the gendered identity one sees as reflections of his/her true self. It is really quite
interesting, considering the fact that the view has always been that the gender follows
from the sex of a person. Gender is a social construct, a set of practices, a prescribed
social meanings, and roles. The sex is taken to be the deciding factor of society in order
The lesbian cannot be identified as a lesbian when she is born, thus her genitals
speak for her like any other woman, unless she is a hermaphrodite but this aspect is a
whole different inquiry. Corresponding to her sex, she will be conventionally raised to
occupy the gender role of the feminine. Some lesbians would discover their desire for the
same-sex as early as their preparatory years, but nonetheless she will normally raise as a
girl. This would continue until she refuses to identify herself with the role of the
feminine, and eventually find a category that would suit her. On the other hand, she could
continue the portrayal of the feminine, disregarding the feature of her object of desire.
38
Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, (US:Routledge Press,
1999), 34-45.
38
doctrine. It defines people as duly recognized subjects and should not be dehumanized
thought, rather than active subjects and rational agents, is to objectify them. It is fitting to
say that the meaning of the word objectification is to be taken as a fitting humanist
perspective. False representations and images are a few ways in which objectification is
employed. Through the deployment of these meanings, the lesbian becomes invisible.
There comes a point where the representations are normalized to become social facts. In
effect, the lesbian exposed to this sort of social reality finds herself needing to conform to
the stereotype presented to her in order to reconcile her existence within the cultural fiber.
The lesbian becomes noticeable if society scrutinizes her identity from the dominant
would be necessary to interpret the lesbian as something that is centered on the masculine
The portrayal of gay and lesbian identity in contemporary arts practices has been
pivotal in debates that surround gender equality and social recognition. The visual is a
powerful tool on how individuals would build their views regarding gender, especially in
In speaking of the “queer,” I aim to again put this thesis in the correct context.
Queer individuals move outside the traditional GLBTQ. His or her desire to be accepted
within the social reality is done by demanding the same treatment of heterosexuals
towards a more culturally confrontational stance. This is done through the questioning of
39
Peter Horn and Reina Lewis, Outlooks: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities and Visual Cultures,
(London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Grp, 1996),13.
39
individual and collective identity, and as deviant of the usual scheme of society. To adjust
homosexuals from heterosexuals, but still accepting the argument of valid equality. This
goes to say that unlike previous cases wherein lesbians proclaim that “we are just like
you,” the lesbian accepts and declares that “we are not the same, we experience a
different social reality, we view the world differently but we deserve what you deserve.”
representational level. As such, it appears that the woman and lesbian are mere objects for
the “masculine gaze.” The masculine gaze becomes a meaning-making approach that
makes all texts sensible and made only for the heterosexual and the male desires.
The principle of consistency has assumed that gender identity, gender role
inseparable relationship with each other. This implies that a stereotyped lesbian is a
person whose identification deviates from the assigned sexual object of choice, sexual
identity, as well on her gender role orientation and gender identity. Because of this, it is
far more common to construe the lesbian as a masculine female, as typified by the phrase,
“man trapped in a woman’s body.” This type of lesbian does indeed exist in the form of
the butch, one who dresses and acts like a man. Such a portrayal has both explicit and
implicit consequences, both for those who share the label lesbian, and for those who view
the lesbian. There has been a debate within the feminist community on whether the butch
40
that anchor on treating the lesbian as an instrument for any cause. Albeit, for the sake of
discourse, I believe one would have to examine the “butch” as a valid lesbian identity.
Hence, our project now is how to reconcile such with collective and identity politics.
There is no doubt that the butch is not the only kind of lesbian but is the most
noticeable. To be a butch would mean that others would assume that one is a lesbian
primarily because of her physical appearance. It would also not require asking or turning
on the “gaydar,” a supposed instinctive tool/myth that homosexuals can sense if another
is or is not of the same gender category. The typical butch is seen as masculine, with the
following characteristics: uses wrap garters to hide their breasts, wear male clothes, and
is keen to follow male-female relationship patterns. Assuming the butch identity allows a
lesbian to situate herself within a heteropatriarchal society, she has the capacity to
reinvent the category of masculine by playing out the role without much emphasis on the
phallus. This goes to say as well that butch-femme, the latter as the feminine lesbian,
cases that butch-femme relationships occur, society conceives the sexual acts of the two
heterosexualized.
41
Being subject to pornification and male gaze, the lesbian is conditioned to be seen
by herself and others as a sex object. The relationship a lesbian maintain becomes nothing
more but an erotic stimulus for the male. As the GP circuit magazine states, “one woman
Pornography has always been designed for the men, while an M-to-M (male-to-
male) pornography is for gay men. Heterosexual sex videos are essentially constructed
for the straight man’s eyes. Adversely, lesbian sex is portrayed with as much dependence
on a penetrative object or another male actor in order to alienation from masculine gaze.
The woman is objectified, and her body becomes her identity. When the lesbian is
objectified, she loses grip of her subject position. This contributes to her displacement
such that she does not engage in society as an equal. Instead, she assumes a lower degree
of recognition. When the lesbian moves from the erotic to the romantic or intimate, this is
partnership as a legitimate one and such grave difference to the heteronormative “love” is
The lesbian deciphers her own “meanings” from different codes presented to her,
one of which is how she sees her “self” as others portray the “lesbian.” There was a time
when lesbianism was a marginalized and invisible character in different kinds of media.
The lesbian characters of old films and literary texts were presented as bitter, butch-type,
40
“Double Sexy, Double Standard?”, in GP Circuit Magazine, vol. 1 issue 3, (Quezon City: ABS-
CBN Publishing Inc., 2005).
42
and suicidal. These kinds of portrayals have a huge impact on how society viewed
lesbians, and how they viewed themselves. This claim was captured through the words of
Victor Russo, a film critic and writer of the book entitled “The Celluloid Closet:”
In a hundred years of movies, homosexuality has only rarely been depicted on the screen.
When it did appear, it was there as something to laugh at—or something to pity—or even
something to fear. These were fleeting images, but they were unforgettable, and they left
a lasting legacy. Hollywood, that great maker of myths, taught straight people what to
think about gay people … and gay people what to think about themselves.41
However, such artistic portrayal has gone through some changes in the
introduction of lesbian themed shows and movies. This allows the community to gain
access to others like them, or at least be able to witness their story being unfolded for
public viewing. It may be said that such appeal does not go easily accepted in societies.
The lesbian has become a hot topic for both documentaries and fictions. This has had
great effect on how lesbians viewed their identity as being more and more acceptable in
societies today. Because of such exposure, one of the negative impacts of being able to
gain access in lesbian lifestyle is the pronounced complacency of the urban lesbian. This
is also true for lesbians in other areas with traditional belief. And instead of embracing it,
Furthermore, gay and lesbian themed films and television series tend to highlight
the sexual rather than the actual experience of lesbian relationships. Take for example the
popularized “Queer as Folk,” a series revolved around the lives of gay men. If one would
be able to gain a copy of the said series, he/she would agree that two-thirds of the
show that was recently aired in a local cable channel, contained the same emphasis on sex
when viewed in its original form. The version that was aired in the Philippines had too
41
Victor Russo, The Celluloid Closet, (New York: Harper and Row, 1981), 4.
43
much censorship on the sexual scenes. Consequently, the show’s storyline became
somewhat incoherent due to the fact that even some of the conversations were removed.
The result is a conservative form of “Sex and the City,” thus it is a fact that to a certain
According to the Riddle Homophobia scale, the act of mainstreaming shows that
portray lesbian lifestyle, but removed contents that would affirm the difference in
lifestyle, would implicitly mean that there is still something left to accept. As such, even
at this point, the lesbian is still displaced because her identity is still not completely
recognized. The emphasis has been placed on her label as a “lesbian,” but there is still
unwillingness to accept the essential features that constitute the term. The result is an
identity. With this, civil society fails to recognize that being a lesbian extend to one’s
accommodate gays and lesbians. As I have shown in Chapter One, despite legislative
the norms of society. As a result, lesbians are denied heterosexual privileges while their
In terms of institutional recognition, lesbian partnerships are not valid in the eyes
of the law. Same-sex marriages and civil unions are still being debated on religious
grounds of homosexuality and marriage. Meanwhile, the Catholic Church considers the
44
union of a man and a woman as the only acceptable kind in the eyes of God. In other
forms of religion like Islam, the lesbian does not exist, thus they do not consider a
To deny marriage rights to gays and lesbians would to equate that the government
also limits the right of these individuals to have a family. Children with same-sex parents
are often teased in schools. Lesbian couples across the globe find it almost impossible to
legally adopt orphans. Likewise, they equally find it difficult to avail rights and privileges
awarded by the state for heterosexual families. Lesbians should be allowed to have their
partnership recognized, whether or not they plan to avail of such rights, for the very
simple reason a person essentially possess is the ability to choose any person of his/her
desire without being subjected to malice and disapproval. Hence, there is a need for
appropriate legislatures that will address the growing concern for lesbian displacement in
society.
45
Gender oppression is the individual acts of abuse and violence, patterns of power
and control, and systems of abuse and violence perpetrated against women and girls due
to their gender (cite source). As mentioned in the beginning of this thesis, the
chapter aims to set certain conditions that will aid in producing a gender-just society. I
believe that gender justice is the only real solution in resolving the issue of double
Approach. Afterwards I shall be laying down the three Capability Principles, as purported
by Ingrid Robeyns, and modify them to accommodate gays and lesbians alike.
Amartya Sen is an Indian philosopher and economist who won the Nobel Prize in
applied the framework to address issues of poverty and development. The theory is
founded on the assumption that all human beings have functional capabilities or
substantial freedoms such that these are freedoms that people have a reason to value
most. When Sen speaks of function, he refers to a human being’s capability to function in
enacting one’s important desires. In this case, capabilities are the modes of a person’s
innate capacity of freedom and practical choice. It must be noted that when Sen speaks of
Sen asserts positive freedom as a set of opportunities that is open to a person. This
set consists of vectors of functionings, where functionings are the different things a
person can do or can be. Hence, a person’s capability may be taken to describe her
positive freedom such that it reflects her “ability to achieve valuable functionings and
is why people have the ability to do and to be. As such, society must
aid in guaranteeing that all members are able to act upon their
curtailed from certain human rights. Sen has pointed out different ways in which such
deprivation can occur: state oppression, economic incapacity, ignorance, social hate, false
consciousness, et cetera. The Capabilities Approach has been utilized in analyzing the
problem of inequalities between males and females. In the following section, I have
persons on the account that they are agents who uniquely possess the
42
Amartya Sen, “Freedom of Choice”, in European Economic Review, 1988, Vol. 32 issue 2-3, p
278.
47
guaranteeing that all members are able to act upon their capabilities.
Below which are the three principles that one must meet in order for a gender-just
society to exist. As of the moment, no state has yet to enact fully the consequences of
contemporary of Amartya Sen, originally formulated these principles in her argument for
The first principle states that the capability sets for men and women
should be the same. The only justified inequalities between men and
rather than demanding for absolute freedom. The need for social order
old age, to secure property, and to receive merit for one’s action. It
anarchic.
that provides absolute freedom and yet sacrifices social order, or worse
need to uphold sex-based standards, like those in the military and the
48
for most of its tasks. There are values and traits that have become
themselves.43 This principle adheres to the fact that people are rational
and free agents. The ethical or the moral justification preferred in this
with one’s ability to act upon certain values he/she finds valid reason
43
Martha Nussbaum, “Armatya Sen: Social Justice and the Capabilities Approach”, in
Contemporary Political Philosophy, (Cambridge: University Press, 2001), 67.
49
generally substantial for human beings per se. It does not have to take
that gendered social and moral norms play a vital role in how people
of behavior. It has been argued that the lesbian in both instances were
seen as “dykes” and man-haters. The topic of the lesbian was a taboo
entail.
44
Ingrid Robeyns, “When will Society be Gender Just”, Reorienting the Feminist Imagination,
(Cambridge:UP, 2007), p 32
50
raised and having to live with social norms that are not gender-just.
One would initially find herself resisting such limitations. But sooner or
would eventually become “satisfied” in the sense that she would have
to accept the fact that: “there are acts and privileges heterosexuals
receive that she will neither be able to acquire nor do.” If gendered
Robeyns as:
45
Ibid, 32.
46
Ibid, 35.
51
job markets. It has been argued that some jobs, which are
and evaluation and calculation of work merits. However, what has been
employment is partially due to the fact that they are culturally labeled
as “feminine jobs.”48
gay individuals who are more inclined with things and activities related
to aesthetics and creativity. The ordinary man and woman would agree
wise, some gays find it extra difficult to prove their capacity in the
work force. In the support groups I have attended for gays and
47
Ibid.
48
Ibid.
52
find jobs suited for their educational background. GLBTQ and women
are subjected to job ceiling practice in the work force as they are
companies and institutions, and the fact that they prefer women who
I have mentioned earlier that in order for the lesbian to form a genuine gender
identity, she would have to overcome her displacement as a homosexual and transcend
her woman category imposed on her sexed body. To ask the lesbian to define what it
means to be a gendered-being under her own terms would mean a demand to reconstruct
the rigidity placed in standardizing gender roles in our society. The problem with the
mimicry of heterosexuality.49 In reality, what is left misunderstood is that the social and
gender scripts available to a lesbian would always have gendered qualities of the male or
female.
Identity can be a very ambiguous term. Even if one limits its scope to a discussion
of a gendered identity, there would still be blurred lines to confront in the process.
Identity is a construct, created by the person. However, this does not mean that the
process of creating a unified gendered self is exclusive to the individual. Instead one must
look at identity as an interplay of the “I” and the society, in which she reveals and
a lesbian would mean changing teams. The Butch or the masculine female becomes the
most noticeable image of lesbianism because of the naturalization applied to the concept
of the masculine as an unexplored domain for the woman. There are certain institutions
that would need to maintain the standards of masculinity or femininity, but the two
should be made accessible to anyone who is willing to take and maintain such roles.
49
Amy Goodloe, Butch-Femme Roles and Identity Politics; essay, 25.
54
these binaries should be viewed as continuums rather than opposing poles. The
masculine-feminine distinction should maintain its societal status as far as certain gender
roles ought to be preserved for imperative reasons. The problem lies in making social
possibilities exclusively gendered ones, such that the person loses his or her privilege to
access, despite her intent to uphold the standard set by the society with regards to a
thinking of people. When accessed and owned by the lesbian, the masculine loses its
“naturalization” as being exclusive to the male.50 However, it must be made clear that for
this to be an authentic representation in a society, it must not stem out of the lesbian’s
construction of her representation in various institutions. In this case, the lesbian has to be
vigilant in correcting the myths that surround her identity. The gay and the lesbian must
Political advocacy is the best starting point for the lesbian to gain rightful
recognition in a society. The lesbian community must demand for a seat in discourses that
seek to foster progress and equality. For as long as she allows others to define who she is
and bends to the limits of what society says she can do, the lesbian will never be able to
achieve a genuine identity. The process of explicitly challenging the status would more
likely be difficult. Regardless of this, the lesbian should not choose for the easy way out
50
Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, 46.
55
and remain passive. As disturbing as it may sound, direct abuse on the initial phase of the
lesbian’s struggle may be a start to demand for change. If the lesbian continues to be
passive, her fear of persecution might as well be tantamount in a fear of gaining her
dignity.
Choose to be Human
I resolve into claiming that there would always be an irreducible being, a person
prior to exposure to culture inscriptions and social impositions, who owns an identity
grounded on the concept of freedom and choice. Upon a lesbian’s introduction into the
physical world, as I have mentioned in earlier chapters, she becomes a sexed entity who
shall accordingly be trained to particular practices in accordance with her sex. When I say
that the lesbian ought to be able to choose the modes in which she could express her
gendered self, it no longer becomes of much value that she possesses a body of a female.
She could choose to portray the woman or man, for as long as she made a long, thought
out choice to do so. This would imply also that if a man wishes to adopt the functions
implored by the concept of femininity, he must be able to do so. If he refuses, it ought not
to be because he conceives the attribute of the feminine as inferior. Otherwise, it does not
reflect the identity he feels to own. The question would now arise: How would it be
It has been the aim of gays and lesbians alike to avail of certain civil liberties that
they feel they deserve by virtue of being persons and I, of course, would have to agree.
Likewise, the right to marriage that is recognized by the law is important to reconstruct a
56
society not founded on equality but on justice and freedom. For a society to loosen up its
gender restrictions on social relations and practices, the state must initiate recognition of
value is converted into a qualitative one. It becomes oppressive when the lesbian’s view
of herself lacks positive references in society and becomes uninformed of the means in
which she could understand her gendered self. A layman should stop at looking at people
as man or woman. One must hold true to the belief that these categories are mere social
constructs. If one faces the reality that even sex, as an immutable feature of personhood,
has lost meaning in a sense that one is no longer tied up to his or her biology, then one
could accept the possibility of revolutionizing gender reality. This is not a reality that is
built on the gender annihilation, like what the postmodern feminists want. Instead,
certain masculine-feminine feature. The lesbian identity is grounded on the idea that
beyond the man or woman, the lesbian is a person whose only immutable quality is her
Equality has a nice ring to it. But for oppressions to really be a thing of the past,
one must realize that people are not equal. There are physical limits, intellectual
constraints, and individuals who are better than others that should not be taken negatively
all the time. For as long as a society grants access to opportunities regardless of gender,
class, race, and et cetera, it can no longer be accused of being unfair just because some
people live out their potentialities and capabilities farther than others. To offer
possibilities equally is to center our efforts in truly revealing the truth of being a person.
57
Justice is to be the ultimate concern if one wishes to have a society that aims for
the ultimate good. A decontextualized Plato’s just society would be a classic and
through the choices they make. The lesbian must be able to act on the range of
possibilities she may choose to become and what she envisions herself to be. Though
cliché, this thesis only wishes to say: Give to a human what is due to a human, neither as
The main argument of this thesis is that lesbianism is afflicted with the problem of
double-displacement. It has perceived the identity of the lesbian based on the sex and
gender she possesses. In terms of her sexed body being female, she becomes the recipient
of sexist related oppression. The woman today is still engaged in a gender revolution, and
its success would be for the female to lose the stigma of inferiority and Otherness in
relation to man.
As a lesbian, she occupies a gender that is outside of the masculine and the
feminine binary. The inability to occupy the social norm of genders implies that the
displacement occurs in two forms: a) direct, the lesbian encounters homophobia and
not recognized at all as a valid gendered identity. She may be seen as invisible and
heterosexual privileges are withheld from her. Furthermore, the lesbian is objectified and
misrepresented through the media. This becomes a powerful tool on how her society
would perceive her, and how the lesbian would view her self.
In order to resolve the problem of double displacement, this thesis offers a general
Approach of Amartya Sen and Martha Naussbaum were used as a building block in
forming the ideal concept of gender-justice. Three principles have to be met in order to
intervention.
to find its way into reality, the lesbian must also do her part. I speak for
the lesbian’s need to explicitly assert her identity and to challenge the
flaws of the status quo. The passiveness of the lesbian has kept her
privileges.
60
bearings, sex partner of choice, and gender per se. The root of any
other people. Surely, the answer is no. Gays and lesbians possess the
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bunch, Charlotte. Lesbian’s in Revolt. In: Lesbianism and the Women’s Movement. Diana
Press, 1975.
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. US: Routledge
Press, 1999.
Calhoun, Cheshire. Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2000.
Calhoun, Cheshire. “The Gender Closet, in Women and Values,” Readings in Recent
Feminist Philosophy, 3rded. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999.
Fabeni, Stefano. “The Violations of the Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and
Transgender Persons in ZAMBIA,” International Gay and Human Rights
Commission Report, July 2007.
Goodloe, Amy. Butch-Femme Roles and Identity Politics. Essay, p. 25, undated.
Hamilton, Louise. Mlle De Beauvoir: “A Synopsis and Analysis of the Second Sex,”
Femwrytsfem, December 2001. Available from
www.femwrytsfem.com/article/23892, accessed July 2007.
Hooks, Bell. “Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center.” Woman and Values: Readings
in Recent Feminist Philosophy, 3rded. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company,
1999. 26-29
Horn, Peter and Lewis Reina. Outlooks: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities and Visual
Cultures. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Grp, 1996.
Hyde, Janet Shibley. “Lesbianism and Bisexuality.” In: Half the Human Experience: the
Psychology of Women, 3rd ed. D.C: Health and Company, 1985.
Nussbaum, Martha. “Armatya Sen: Social Justice and the Capabilities Approach.” In:
Contemporary Political Philosophy. Cambridge: University Press, 2001.
Pearsall, Marilyn. Women and Values: Readings in Recent Feminist Philosophy, 3rded.
Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999.
Penelope, Julia. “Heteropatriarchal Semantics and Lesbian Identity: The Ways a Lesbian
Can Be.” In: Call Me Lesbian: Lesbian Lives, Lesbian Theory, Freedom. CA:
Crossing Press, 1992.
62
Reding, Andre. Sexual Orientation and Human Rights in the Americas. New York: World
Policy Institute, 2003.
Robeyns, Ingrid. “When will Society be Gender Just,” Reorienting the Feminist
Imagination. Cambridge: UP, 2007.
Sen, Amartya. “Freedom of Choice.” European Economic Review Vol. 32 Issue 2-3
(1988): p 278
Schuvik, Giltraud. The Birth of the Woman: An Introduction to Feminism. New York:
Basic Books, 1993.
Thompson, Becky. Maria Trinidad Gutierrez and the Mexican Lesbian and Gay
Movement. In: Sojourner: The Women’s Forum, Vol. 21, No. 10 30, June
1996.
Vuckovic, Dragana. Discrimination against Lesbians and gays in Siberia 2006. In:
www.labris.org.yu:http://www.labris.org.yu/en/index.php?option=com_content&t
ask=view&id=136&Itemid=48, accessed August 16, 2007.
Double Sexy, Double Standard. GP Circuit Magazine, Vol. 1 Issue 3, Quezon City: ABS-
CBN Publishing Inc. (2005): 52-53.