Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
_____________________________
70 IM! 2005, eI. 55, 8e. 1
arthroscopy, because of the difcult shaving of the
posterior synovial tissue from the maleolar crypts and
risk of cartilage deterioration, even when a postero-
lateral approach and external xator joint distraction
was used. Moreover, ankle rehab proved easier than in
knee or elbow.
29,47
Knee arthroplasty
Joint surfaces erosions, together with subcondral
cysts and marked osteopenia can cause a decient bone
stock and a higher risk for perioperative fracture.
7,31,32
The disadvantages of the technique are a much
higher infection rate (7 times higher)
31
than routine
arthroplasty, the risk of early implant loosening,
arthroplasty failure, together with the fact that the vast
majority of patients are young and active. The partially
dislocated patella, usually externally, is eroded taking
a shell appearance, inadequate for the reception
of a prosthetic component. Because of synovial
hypertrophy and arthrobrosis, the approach is slower
and more difcult. The main indication for surgery is
disabling knee pain and deformity.
31,32,50
In preoperative planning and during intervention
the following aspects should be taken into
consideration:
1. The necessity of a large bony resection to correct
deformity, which might need an additionally stabilized
implant, the use of relatively small components and a
relative muscular atrophy with altered functionality.
2. A ligamentary disequilibrium after asymmetric
resection to correct deformity.
3. Numerous technical difculties which often
require complementary gestures (capsulo-ligamentary
release, subperiosteal disinsertion of the popliteal
tendon and of the lateral collateral ligament in a marked
valgus deformity, almost systematic semimembranous
disinsertion for genu varum,
50,51
tibial corrective
osteotomies and distal femoral osteotomies.
54,55
Most authors
31,32,50,51,52
recommend the use of
cemented tricompartimental prosthetic designs. The
cement can be used to cover the free osteotomy planes
to prevent bleeding.
Range of motion is not substantially improved
after arthroplasty.
50
Manipulations can be performed
between the 7th and 10th postoperative day, before
the formation of adherences.
29
Physiokynetotherapy
is essential for a good result and is postoperatively
continued for 6-9 weeks. 28 It needs factor protection
in the rst 3 weeks (30% from normal concentration
before each session)
29
and an excellent patient
compliance.
Hip arthroplasty
A unic aspect in these patients is the remarkable
limp with a stiff lower limb due to knee and ankle
arthrobrosis.
31
This produces increased tensions on
the hip because of the length of the lever arm and loss
of the shock absorbent function of knee and ankle.
In patients with important hip destruction, total hip
arthroplasty was extremely efcient. Joint mobility is
largely improved after this procedure.
54
Arthrodesis of the hip is contraindicated even
in young patients due to the presence of knee
arthropathy.
32
FI0re 3. A||||uup| ]|u1|u|]. |u| || ]|u1|+| ||u|J||||
||p||+||u|
FI0re 4. E||uW ]|u1|u|] +|J |+J|+| |+J /||u| || + 3Z ].u. W|||
1| B |]p ||up||||+
_____________________________
Ieaa l. 8raaea et aI 71
Unlike in the knee, cemented prosthesis have not
performed as well as non-cemented designs. A reason
for the early loosening of hip prosthesis in haemophilia
can be the additional stress of the limp. Another
consideration refers to the possibility of bone-cement
interface bleeding.
40,54
Elbow arthroplasty in haemophiliacs is rarely
performed due to limited reconstructive options in
case of an infection.
31,32
It can become an option in
the future. There are few studies on small series on
shoulder arthroplasty in haemophiliacs, especially
because of the good results of arthrodesis.
6,7,31,40
One
of the problems seems to be the insufcient bone
stock at the glenoid cavity level. 31 The increase in
range of motion after arthroplasty is also modest.
31
Knee arthrodesis is to be considered in extremely
damaged joints with exum and axial deformity,
especially in young patients, where endoprosthethic
arthroplasty is impossible. It has the advantages of good
functional results and correction of joint deformity. It
is crucial however to preserve the contralateral joint in
a good condition.
6,7,40
Ankle and shoulder arthrodesis prove
satisfactory on small series of patients with
haemophilia.
6,7,31,33,40
The use of internal xation in
detriment of the external xation is recommended to
eliminate bleeding and infection around the xation
rods.
33
Flexion contractures can be corrected by
removing bony ridges during arthrodesis.
33
Luck et
al. recommend tibiotalar compression arthrodesis to
relieve pain, reduce hemarthrosis and equina in adult
patients with haemophilia.
31
Shoulder arthrodesis
presents the privilege of a lower infection rate, longer
life span and force in the upper limb, compared to
arthroplasty.
31,32
The optimal arthrodesis position
is 20-30 abduction, 30 exion and 30-40 internal
rotation.
31
Corrective osteotomy
For hemophiliacs with axial deformities osteotomies
can be necessary.
52,53,55,56
In patients with symptomatic
genu varum, proximal tibial valgus osteotomy can be
performed.
52,53,55
Rodriguez-Merchan et al. described
14 haemophiliacs suffering from symptomatic genu
varum treated with osteotomy. They preferred the
excision of tibioperoneal syndesmosis to peroneal
osteotomy. Their conclusion was proximal tibial
osteotomy is efcient and feasible.
32
Iracture treatment
Some authors think these are rare in haemophiliacs
who presumably lead a very cautious life.
6,22,40
Others
suggest that haemophiliacs are predisposed to fractures
due to osteopenia, cysts resulted after intraosseous
haemorrhage, prolonged imobilisation and oral
steroids treatment.
4,31
Joint instability, axial deformities,
muscular retraction and atrophy predispose to falling
injuries.
Fractures are frequently produced after minor
trauma, being sometimes masked by muscular
haematoma and associated hemarthrosis. Femoral
fractures are most frequent representing 50% of all
fractures.
32
After obtaining haemostasis, the fracture
can be treated following the general principles of
fracture treatment in non-haemophilic patients.
Circular casts are prohibited in fracture treatment, in
haemophilia, due to a considerable risk of extensive
haematoma and secondary ischaemia.
32
Due to its considerable risk, osteosinthesis should
be, whenever possible, avoided.
30
Osteotaxis
16,33
is
controversial. In a patient suffering of a moderate
haemophilia and with a highly comminutive fracture
in the distal femur we performed closed reduction
and osteotaxis with external xation. The evolution
was slow, with recurrent bleeding around the
transcutaneous xation rods and haematoma needing
repeated surgical drainage. The resulted callus was
hypertrophic.
16
Conservative treatment can be followed if closed,
stable reduction is obtained. Hospital admission is
recommended. An unstable fracture has a risk of
haematoma and later haemophilic pseudotumor
formation.
16,30,31,32
Pseudotumors
They are specic to haemophilia. Pathogenesis of
this lesion includes progressive haemorrhage resulting in
a encapsulated haematoma whose growth can produce
adjacent tissue destruction. Bone erosion can produce a
pathological fracture and soft tissue and skin erosions,
local and general infection, bleeding and anaemia. These
complications can be lethal. 57 About 1-2% of the
haemophiliacs have pseudotumors and death rate is 30%.
7,40. It has been shown that the main favourising factor
in pseudotumor formation is inadequate substitution
treatment and the presence of inhibitors.
25,31,57
FI0re 5. lW|1 ]+| u|J p+|||| W||| 1| || +||||up+||], ||/u|
+|J 1+|u J|u||||] +|J p+||+| u||u/+||u|. Cu||||1 u|u|u|] +|J
+||||uJ| W+ |+|]
_____________________________
72 IM! 2005, eI. 55, 8e. 1
Bone cysts can be considered early stage
pseudotumors, with uncertain evolution. They can be
mistaken for an osteoid osteoma.
14
Diagnosis includes
echography and MRI.
Giant pseudotumors are expansive and locally
destructive and can be multiple. The nal growth
result is the rigid structures destruction (bones) and the
displacement (e.g. kidneys) or compression of mobile
structures (e.g. nerves). The content of a pseudotumor
is usually vascularized so that arterial embolisation can
be benecial. CT, MRI and arteriography
14,57
are usually
necessary preoperatively. Treatment options include:
1. Radiotherapy, not indicated before but after
surgery.
2. Aspiration and instilation, used only for small
tumors, present an infectious risk.
3. Percutaneous evacuation, which can be difcult
and with a high infectious risk.
57
4. Surgery with complete resection whenever
possible, cavity lling with brin, muscle, internal
xation and bone grafting.
31
Haemophilic patients remain one of the most
defavourized patient category, often regarded as
difcult or impossible to treat. They are obviously
underdiagnosed in our country, with a national
prevalence of 4/100000, while in whole of Europe
is around 10/100000 (data from the National
Haemophilia Register remarkably in Timis county the
prevalence is 9.2/100000).
4
The surgical interventions
on these patients without substitutive coverage will
have serious consequences. Access to substitution
treatment, quality and quantity remains decient.
In the presence of a complete diagnosis and of
an adequate substitution treatment the slowing or
even the arrest of the progression towards chronic
arthropathy can be achieved. Also, surgical treatment
can be applied in these conditions with risks similar to
the non-haemophilic patients. Prophylaxis treatment
CONCLUSIONS
remains actually prohibitive in our country due to
its astronomical costs.
27
Patients with pseudotumors
should always be directed towards a orthopaedic
center specialized in treating haemophilia, having an
experienced surgeon, nurse and anesthesiologist, in close
cooperation with a haematology department. We also
recommend that all the elective surgical interventions
(artroplasty, synovectomy etc.), be done in such
centres. In the case of severe chronic arthropathy with
important deformity and depleted bone stock we must
be prepared for nonstandard situations and implants.
Hemophilic patients with manifestations similar to
non-haemophiliacs, especially those with trauma and
acute hemarthrosis, should be immediately treated
in any hospital with a haematology department and
sent to a specialized centre only after the management
of the acute event. We must keep in mind that the
rst step in the management of any osteoarticular
complication of haemophilia is the administration
of the decient factor as soon as possible and that
any surgical manoeuvre is allowed only after total
substitution coverage by a haematologist.
Haemophilia is a singular disease. Without
treatment the severe haemophiliacs will die during
adolescence or early adulthood. However with an ideal
substitution these patients can be considered healthy
and suffer no bleeding episodes or disability. That
depends on many factors, especially on the economical
status of the health system and that of the patient. In
a wealthy system, the substitution depends only on the
haematologist and the patients discipline.
The severity of the manifestations depends
on the severity of the disease and of the quality of
the substitution treatment. The management of
haemophilia needs a multidisciplinary approach and is
extremely expensive.
FI0re 6. G|+|| puJu|u|u| u| J||+| ||u|+| p|p|]|. |Rl ||+ u| +
!3 ]+| u|J.
1. Manhalter C. Molekularbiologische Grundlagen der Haemophilie A und
B und des von Willebrand-Syndroms. Haemophilie. Die Antworten
2000:12-18.
2. erban M, Schramm W. Hemostazeologie clinic. Brumar Ed, Timioara,
2001.
3. Aronstam A, Rainsfad SG, Painter MJ. Patterns of bleeding in adolescents
with severe hemophilia A. BMJ 1979;1:469-79.
4. Petrescu C. Hemolia - complicaii i sechele. PhD Thesis, Timioara.
5. Klein I, Andricovics H, Bors A, et al. A haemophilia A and B molecular
genetic diagnosis programme in Hungary: a highly informative and
costeffective strategy. Haemophilia 2001;7(3):306-12.
6. Aledort LM, Haschmeyer RH, Pettersson H. A longitudinal study of
orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor VIII-decient haemophiliacs.
The Orthopaedic Outcome Study Group. J Intern Med 1994;236:
391-9.
7. Arnold WD, Hilgartner MW. Hemophilic arthropathy: current concept of
pathogenesis and management. J Bone Surg Am 1977;59:287-305.
RLILRLNCLS
_____________________________
Ieaa l. 8raaea et aI 73
8. Mohr W. Pathogenese der Arthropathie. In: Scharrer I, Schramm W.
(eds)23. Hmophilie-Symposium, Hamburg. Springer Ed, 1992:83-94.
9. Morris CJ, Blake DR, Wainwright AC, et al. Relationship between iron
deposits and tissue damage in the synovium: an ultra structural study.
Ann Rheum Dis 1986;45:21-6.
10. Pettersson H, Ahlberg A, Nilsson IM. A radiologic classication of
haemophilic arthropathy. Clinical Orthopaedic. 1980;149:153-9.
11. Schramm W, Royal S, Kroner B et al. Clinical outcomes and resource
utilization associated with haemophilia care in Europe. Haemophilia
2002;8:3343.
12. Branea I, Poenaru D, Serban M, et al. Hemolia i complicaiile sale
osteoarticulare etiopatogenie i elemente de diagnostic. Revista de
Ortopedie i Traumatologie 2005;1(5),53-7.
13. Pettersson H, Gilbert MS. Classication of the hemophilic arthropathy.
In: Pettersson H, Gilbert MS (eds) Diagnostic imaging in hemophilia.
Springer Ed, New York, 1985:5668.
14. Nuss R, Kilcoyne RF, Geraghty S, et al. Utility of magnetic resonance
imaging of hemophilic arthropathy in children. J Pediatr
1993;123:388-92.
15. Barnes C, Wong P, Egan B, et al. Reduced Bone Density Among
Children With Severe Hemophilia. Pediatrics 2004;114(2):177-81.
16. Poenaru D., erban M., Patrascu J., Branea I., Birsasteanu F. Chirurgia
electiv n artropatiile cronice hemolice, Revista Societii Romne
de Ortopedie i Traumatologie (SOROT), 2005;1:9-14.
17. Branea I., Poenaru D., erban M., Ptracu J., Brsteanu V. Tratamentul
chirurgical al artropatiilor hemolice, Jurnalul zilelor academice
timiene 2004:103-7.
18. Klukowska A., Czyrny Z., Laguna P., Brzewski M. Corelation between
clinical, radiological and ultrasonographical image of knee joints in
children with hemophilia, Haemophilia 2001;7(3):286-92.
19. Nilsson IM,Berntorp E, Lofqvist T, Pettersson H Twenty-ve years
experience of prophylactic treatment in severe hemophilia A and B.
J Intern Med 1992;232:2532.
20. Royal S, Schramm W, Berntorp E et al. Quality of life differences
between prophylactic and on-demand factor replacement therapy in
European haemophilia patients. Haemophilia 2002;8:4450.
21. Heim M. (The treatment of intra-articular synovitis by the use of
chemical and radioactive substances. Haemophilia. 2000;8:369-371.
22. Chantraine A., Chapard R.(1977) La reeducation et les problemes
orthopediques dans lhemophilie, Medicine et Hygiene 35, 945-950
23. Mller AA, Kurth L, Hovy A. Konservative Behandlungs massnahmen
der hmophilen Arthropathie Orthopde 1999;28:347-55.
24. Argenti D, Ireland D, Heald DL. A pharmacokinetic and pharmaco-
dynamic comparison of desmopressin administered as a whole,
chewed or crushed tablets, and as an oral solution. J Urol
2001;165(5):1446-51.
25. erban M, Petrescu C, epeneu P et al. Evaluarea ecienei clinice a
rFVIIa n pediatrie. Documenta Haematologica 2000;2:59
26. Nilsson IM, Hedner U, Ahlberg A.Haemophilia prophylaxis in Sweden.
Acta Paediatr Scand 1976;65:129-35
27. Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Lee CA. Inhibitors in patients with haemophilia.
Blackwell, Oxford, 2002.
28. Heim M, Martinowitz U, Horoszowski H. Orthotic management of the
knee in patients with hemophilia. Clin Orthop 1997;343:54-7.
29. Zimmermann R. Rehabilitationstherapie der hmophilen Arthropathie.
In: Scharrer I, Hovy L. Orthopdische Hmophiliebehandlung. Ein
Leitfaden mit Patientenratgeber. Springer, 1996, p. 73-80.
30. Luck JV, Lin JC, Kasper CK, et al. Orthopaedic management of
hemophilic arthropathy, in Chapman MW. Orthopaedic Surgery,
Lippincott William and Wilkins, 2001.
31. Luck JV, Silva M, Rodriguez-Merchan C, et al. Hemophilic arthropathy,
JAAOS, 2004;12:234-45.
32. Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Orthopaedic surgery in persons with
haemophilia. Thromb Haemost 2003;89:34-42.
33. Canale ST, Dugdale M, Howard S. Synovectomy of the knee in young
patients with hemophilia.TN South Med J 1998;81(12):1480-6.
34. Lfquist T, Petersson C, Nilson IM. Radioactive synoviorthesis in
patients with hemophilia with factor inhibitor. Clin Orthop Relat
Res 1997;343:37-41.
35. Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Magallon M, Martin-Villar J, et al. Long term
follow up of haemophilic arthropathy treated by Au-198 radiation
synovectomy. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 1993;17:120-4.
36. Caviglia H, Galatro G, Duhalde C, et al. Haemophilic synovitis: is
rifampicin an alternative? In: Lee CA, Kessler CM (eds) Haemophilia
1998;4:514-7.
37. Heim M. The treatment of intra-articular synovitis by the use of
chemical and radioactive substances.Haemophilia 2000;8:369-71.
38. Ehrenforth S, Kreuz W, Scharrer I, et al. Incidence of development of
factor VIII and factor IX inhibitors in haemophiliacs. Haemophilia
1999;7:254-8.
39. Horoszowski H, Heim M, Schulman S, et al. Multiple joint procedure
in a single operative session on hemophilic patients. Clin Orthop
1996;328:60-4.
40. Post M, Telfer M.C. Surgery in hemophilic patients. J Bone Joint Surg
1975;57A:1136-46.
41. Phillips AM, Sabin CA, Ribbans WJ, et al. Orthopaedic surgery in
hemophilic patients with human immunodeciency virus. Clin
Orthop 1997;343:81-7.
42. Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with
haemophilia who are HIV-positive. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:
170-2.
43. Triantafyllou SJ, Hanks GA, Handal JA, et al. Open and arthroscopic
synovectomy in hemophilic arthropathy of the knee. ClinOrthop
1992;283:196-204.
44. Storti E, Ascari E. Surgical and chemical synovectomy. Ann NY Acad
Sci 1975;240:316-27.
45. Montane I, McCollough NC, Lian EC. Synovectomy of the knee for
hemophilic arthropathy, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68(2):210-6.
46. Wiedel JD. Surgical and chemical synovectomy Ann NY Acad Sci
1983;240:316-27.
47. Greene WB. Synovectomy of the ankle for hemophilic arthropathy, J
Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:812-9.
48. Klein KS, Aland CM, Kim HC, et al. Long term follow-up of
arthroscopic synovectomy for chronic hemophilic synovitis.
Arthroscopy 1987;3(4):231-6.
49. Le Balch T, Ebelin M, Laurian Y, et al Synovectomy of the elbow in
young hemophilic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(2):264-9.
50. Teigland JC, Tjonfjord GE, Evensen GA, et al. Knee arthroplasty in
hemophilia: a 15 year follow-up of 15 patients. Acta Orthop Scand
1993;64;153-6.
51. Cohen I, Heim M, Martinowitz V, et al. Orthopaedic outcome of total
knee replacement in haemophilia A. Haemophilia 200;6:1049.
52. Trieb K, Cetin E, Bitzan P, et al. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial
osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:785.
53. Meding J, Keating EM, Ritter MA, et al. Total knee arthroplasty after
high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 200;82:1252-9.
54. Lofqvist T, Sanzen L, Petersson C, et al. Total hip replacement in
patients with hemophilia. Acta Orthop Scand 1996;67:321-4.
55. Wallny T, Saker A, Hofmann P, et al. Longterm follow-up after
osteotomy for haemophilic arthropathy of the knee. Haemophilia
2003;9:69-75.
56. Caviglia HA, Perez-Bianco R, Galatro G, et al. Extensor supracondylar
femoral osteotomy as treatment for exed haemophilic knee.
Haemophilia 1999;S1:28-32.
57. Caviglia HA, Fernndez-Palazzi F, Galatro G, et al. Percutaneous
treatment of haemophilic pseudotumours. In: Rodriguez-Merchan
EC,Goddard NJ, Lee CA (eds) Musculoskeletal aspects of haemophilia.
Blackwell, Oxford,2000, p. 97-104.