Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
i
snow load shape coefficient (acc. to Table. 3.1 and figure 3.3/ CR 1-1-3-2005,
1
=0.8);
s
0,k
characteristic value of snow [kN/m
2
] on the ground at the relevant site (for Timisoara, s
0,k
=
1.5 kN/m
2
);
C
e
exposure coefficient (C
e
= 1 according to Table 2.1/ CR 1-1-3-2005);
C
t
thermal coefficient (C
t
= 1).
1.2.4. Wind load
According to EN1991-1-4 and NP-082-04, the wind load is:
W(z) = q
ref
C
e
(z) C
p
where:
C
e
(z) = exposure factor at height z above the ground
C
e
(z)= cg(z) cr(z) = 1.425 (graph 5, paragraph 11)
C
g
(z) = 1+1.35[2I(z)] = 3.153
I(z)=|
0.5
/2.5ln(z/z
0
) = 0.308
C
r
(z) = k
r
2
(z
0
) (ln z/z
0
)
2
= 0.452
q
ref
= reference wind pressure for Timisoara= 0.4 kPa (acc. to Annexe A/ NP-082-04)
c
p
pressure coefficient (c
pe,10
acc. to chapter 12 from NP-082-04).
1.2.5 Seismic action
Seismic action is evaluated in accordance with the Romanian code P100-1/2006. For Timisoara,
the peak ground acceleration is a
g
=0.16g and the corner period at the upper limit of the constant
acceleration region of the elastic spectrum is Tc=0.7s. Elastic response spectra for horizontal
components of terrain acceleration, |(T), for the fraction of critical dumping =0,05 and the
corner period Tc=0.7s is presented in Figure 10. The structure is considered as non dissipative
q=1; this means that during the earthquake the structure remains in elastic range.
Fig. 10. Elastic response spectra for horizontal components of terrain acceleration, |(T)
AFFORDABLE HOUSES PROJECT The Politehnica University of Timisoara,
Final Project and Design WP2 Romania
13
ArcelorMittal Lige
Research and Development
Finally it should be mention that Romania covers a wide range of climatic, geotechnical
and seismic conditions. These values are summarised in the table below. The values
corresponding for Timisoara covers more than 60% from Romanian territory. For the remaining
40% of Romanian territory adjustment of the existing project should be done.
Natural
Conditions
Snow Load
[KN/m]
Wind Pressure
[KN/m]
Frost Depth
[m]
Ground
Acceleration
Seismic Load
Interval Values
Romania
1.5 2.5 0.4 0.7 0.6 1.1 0.08g 0.32g
Timisoara 1.5 0.4 0.7 0.16g
1.3. Combinations of actions
Combinations of actions were done in accordance with EN1990:2002. For static analysis, the
following loads were taken into account:
P Dead Load
Z Snow load
V.T. Transversal wind load
V.L. Longitudinal Wind load
U Live load
S Seismic load
The following combinations were used:
A) Fundamental combinations
Ultimate limit state
The combination of the structural effects of the loads, for the ULS checking of the structure was
made using the relation:
, ,1 ,
1 2
1.35 1.5
n m
k j k k i
j i
G Q Q
= =
+ +
where:
- G
k,j
= Characteristic value of the permanent action j;
- Q
k,i
= Characteristic value of the accompanying variable action i;
- Q
k,1
= Characteristic value of the leading variable action 1;
-
0,i
= Factor for combination value of the variable action i, taken with the characteristic
value (0.70 for the actions considered).
AFFORDABLE HOUSES PROJECT The Politehnica University of Timisoara,
Final Project and Design WP2 Romania
14
ArcelorMittal Lige
Research and Development
For static and dynamic analysis, the following combinations were used:
Comb.1 1.35 P+ 1.5 U
Comb.2 1.35 P+ 1.5 Z
Comb.3 1.35 P+ 1.5 V.T.
Comb.4 1.35 P+ 1.5 V.L.
Comb.5 1.35 P+ 1.5 U+ 1.05 Z
Comb.6 1.35 P+ 1.5 U+ 1.05 VT
Comb.7 1.35 P+ 1.5 U+ 1.05 VL
Comb.8 1.35 P+ 1.5 Z+ 1.05 U
Comb.9 1.35 P+ 1.5 Z+ 1.05 VT
Comb.10 1.35 P+ 1.5 Z+ 1.05 VL
Comb.11 1.35 P+ 1.5 VT+ 1.05 U
Comb.12 1.35 P+ 1.5 VT+ 1.05 Z
Comb.13 1.35 P+ 1.5 VL+ 1.05 U
Comb.14 1.35 P+ 1.5 VL+ 1.05 Z
Comb.15 1.35 P+ 1.5 U+ 1.05 Z+ 1.05 VT
Comb.16 1.35 P+ 1.5 U+ 1.05 Z+ 1.05 VL
Comb.17 1.35 P+ 1.5 Z+ 1.05 U+ 1.05 VT
Comb.18 1.35 P+ 1.5 Z+ 1.05 U+ 1.05 VL
Comb.19 1.35 P+ 1.5 VT+ 1.05 U+ 1.05 Z
Comb.20 1.35 P+ 1.5 VL+ 1.05 U+ 1.05 Z
Serviceability limit state:
, ,1 0, ,
1 2
n m
k j k i k i
j i
G Q Q
= =
+ +
The combinations of loads are the same as for ULS, taking into account the coefficients from the
above relation.
B) Special combination
, , 2, ,
1 2
n m
k j I E k i k i
j i
G A Q
= =
+ +
where:
- A
E,k
= Characteristic value of seismic action
-
0,i
= Factor for combination value of the variable action i
- Q
i
= 0.4 for snow load and live load
For static and dynamic analysis, the following combination was used:
Comb.21 1.0P + 0.4U + 0.4Z + S for ULS
Comb.22 1.0P + 0.4U + 0.4Z + 0.5S for SLS
AFFORDABLE HOUSES PROJECT The Politehnica University of Timisoara,
Final Project and Design WP2 Romania
15
ArcelorMittal Lige
Research and Development
1.4 Structural design
The steel structure is a multi-storey rigid portal frames structure on transversal direction,
while on longitudinal one is a braced frame. Columns are made by hot-rolled profiles and are
rigid at the base on transversal direction and pinned on longitudinal direction. The transversal
girders are made by hot-rolled profiles and are semi-rigid at both ends while the longitudinal
girders, which stabilize the transversal frames, are pinned on the columns. To take over the
horizontal loads vertical bracings are disposed. Main structural skeleton is made by hot-rolled
profile (European profiles HEA for columns, IPE profiles for beams).
The static and dynamic analysis was performed using Axis VM 9.0 software. The design
of the structural elements (columns, beams, bracings) was made according with EN1993-1-1,
EN1993-1-3, EN1993-1-8 and Romanian seismic design code P100-1/2006, both for Ultimate
limit state and Serviceability limit state. To control the floor vibrations the limit to avoid
significant discomfort to users was taken L/350, reasonable value for a family house.
Main structural skeleton is made by hot-rolled profile. The materials used are as follows:
- S355J0 steel for beams;
- S355J0 steel for columns;
- M16 gr.10.9 bolts for beam-column connection;
- M16 gr.10.9 bolts for bracings connection;
- M30 gr. 6.6. anchorage bolts
1.5 Foundations
The foundations have been designed for a current soil in Timisoara area, i.e.:
The foundation soil has the following stratification:
- 0.00 0.30 m = vegetal soil =16.7 KN/m
3
- 0.30 7.5 m = sandy dust:
= 18.8 KN/m
3
e = 0.65 Sr = 0.8
Ic = 0.8 = 190 c = 14 KN/m
2
E = 10000 KN/m
2
- 7,5 m .. = sandy clay
= 21 KN/m
3
e = 0.74
Ic = 0.78 = 240 c = 12 KN/m
2
E= 22000 KN/m
2
The underground water level is H= 6.00 m
The frost depth for Timisoara is H
i
= 70 cm (Acc. to STAS 6054/77)
According to NP112-04 3.2.4. Table 3.1
For sandy silt having H
i
0.70m and H>2.50m, the foundation depth must me greater than 80 cm
(H
f
> 80 cm).
According to NP112-04 6.1.5
- The building category = common building (CO)
- Sensitivity to the differentiated settlements = not sensitive
- Restrains regarding the serviceability deformations = no restrains
AFFORDABLE HOUSES PROJECT The Politehnica University of Timisoara,
Final Project and Design WP2 Romania
16
ArcelorMittal Lige
Research and Development
According to NP112-04 6.1.6, the foundation design differ function of the soil category:
- good soils (TB)
- difficult soils
According to NP112-04, table 6.1, for cohesive soils with medium plasticity (sandy silt), having
e<1 and I
c
0.5, the foundation soil will be considered a good one (TB).
According to NP112-04, table 6.2, for good foundation soils (TB), buildings importance class
regular building (CO), soil not sensitive to the differentiated settlements and without restrains
regarding the serviceability deformations, the design of the foundation will be made by
considering the conventional pressure p
conv
, as the acceptable pressure. Isolated foundations
under columns tied by foundation beams were chosen as foundation solution. These foundations
transmit the exterior loads to the soil through isolated foundations. In order to establish effective
pressure and the necessary reinforcement in the foundations, there were computed the loadings
transmitted by the columns and the walls.
1.6 Technical requirements for steel structures
EN1090 specifies requirements for execution of steel structures, in order to ensure adequate
levels of mechanical resistance and stability, serviceability and durability, and specifies
requirements for execution of structural steelwork as structures or as manufactured components.
EN1090 code will be used to fulfil all technical requirements. Several aspects are pointed out:
- the execution class for the structures as a whole is EXC2;
- all fillet welds indicated in the execution drawings are of class EXC2 (EN ISO 5817
Quality level C generally);
- all but welds indicated in the execution drawings are of class EXC3 (EN ISO 5817
Quality level B);
- all connections with non-preloaded mechanical fasteners shall be visually checked after
they are bolted up with the structure aligned locally;
- geometrical tolerances are according with Chapter 11 and Annexe D of EN1090;
- corrosion protection: surfaces should be painted according with EN ISO 12944 series and
Annex F;
- the structure shall be cleaned to prevent damage by corrosion.
The application of a building design in Romania should be approved by an Authorised Proof
Engineer. It should be mentioned here that Professor Dan Dubina is charted as Proof Engineer.
The use of the project in different conditions (location, loadings, layout, purpose, quality of
materials) than was design cannot be done without the written agreement of the designer. On the
purpose of application the Building Permit has to be obtained from local authority.
2. Structural drawing list
Drawing No. TITLE
F01 Foundation Plan
F02 Foundation Beams Reinforcing Plan
AFFORDABLE HOUSES PROJECT The Politehnica University of Timisoara,
Final Project and Design WP2 Romania
17
ArcelorMittal Lige
Research and Development
F03 Foundation F1
F04 Welded wire mesh reinforcement plan Level -0.04
SM - 01 3D View
SM - 02 Encased Footing Elements
SM - 03 Frame Ax1
SM - 04 Frame Ax2
SM 05 Frame Ax3
SM - 06 Frame Ax4
SM - 07 Frame AxA
SM - 08 Frame AxB
SM - 09 Plan Level +2.84
SM - 10 Plan Level +5.82
SM - 11 Trapezoidal profiled sheet plan Level +2.84
SM - 12 Trapezoidal profiled sheet plan Level +5.82
SM - 13 Welded wire mesh reinforcement plan Level +2.84
SM-14 Secondary Structure - Wood studs : AxA
SM-15 Secondary Structure - Wood studs : AxB
SE-01 Assembly Pi1
SE-02 Assembly CVP1
SE-03 Assembly CVP2
SE-04 Assembly GP1
SE-05 Assembly RL1
SE-06 Assembly RL2
SE-07 Assembly RL3
SE-08 Assembly RL4
SE-09 Assembly RPP1
SE-10 Assembly RPP2
SE-11 Assembly RPP3
SE-12 Assembly RPS1
SE-13 Assembly RPS2
SE-14 Assembly S1
SE-15 Assembly S2
SE-16 Assembly S3
SE-17 Assembly S4
Parts Pa1-Pa6; P1-P31
For complete working drawings see attached folder D.2.1.e-drawings.
D.2.1.f. Quantity survey
- Prices for calculation are as for November of 2009;
- For a 150 sqm. house, taken as an individual built unit, the prices are as follows:
AFFORDABLE HOUSES PROJECT The Politehnica University of Timisoara,
Final Project and Design WP2 Romania
18
ArcelorMittal Lige
Research and Development
Euro Euro /sqm
Materials: 36,998 246.65
Labour: 11,377 75.84
Electrical, heating, plumbing
and sanitary (incl. labour):
8,000 53.33
Total: 56,375 375.83
Gross profit at 4%: 2,255 15.03
Builders price: 58,630 390.86
VAT: 11,140 74.26
Grand Total: 69,769 465.12
- For complete working drawings see attached folder D.2.1.f.
The above prices are for a single built unit. Obviously, a larger development, lets say 100
units, would definitely mean at least 5-10% less per unit or 355.3 Euro/sqm. or 53,299 Euro
(VAT excluded).
D.2.1.g. Bill of materials
No. Name UM Explicit computation Quantity
Infrastructure
1
Removal of topsoil layer,
300 mm depth
m
3
80*0.3= 24 24
2
Foundations excavation,
manual digging
m
3
(1.251.201.20) 8 + (0.30.359.8) 2 +
(0.30.354) 4
18.2
3 Foundations concrete forms m
2
According to structural project 52.6
4 Foundations R-bars kg According to structural project 724
5
Cast in place concrete for
foundations and seismically
beams, C16/20
m
3
According to structural project 15.3
6
Soil compaction, 200 mm
horizontal layers,
compacted according to
local codes
m
3
650.2 13
7
Mechanically compacted
gravel layer, 150 mm
m
3
570.15 8.55
8 Sand layer 50 mm m
3
570.05 2.9
9
Polyetilene foil 0.6mm, 2
layers
m
2
7521.1 165
10
Extruded polyestirene with
tongue and groove 50mm
m
2
651.1 71.5
11 R-bars for slab-on-ground kg According to structural project 432
12
Slab-on-ground, cast in
place reinforced concrete
m
3
670.11.1 7.4
13
Bituminous membrane
under the wood plate
m
2
[(13.4+5.5) 20.4] 1.1 16.6
Supra-structure
14 Structural steel + welded kg According to structural project 6104
AFFORDABLE HOUSES PROJECT The Politehnica University of Timisoara,
Final Project and Design WP2 Romania
19
ArcelorMittal Lige
Research and Development
wire mesh
15 Steel deck m
2
[71.5+65.3] 1.1 151
16
Slab edges from "L" shaped
steel profile
kg According to structural project 130.5
17
Lightweight concrete
topping
m
3
(570.07+1.8) 1.1 6.4
Secondary structure
18
Wood stud enclosure -
plates, studs and blockings
m
3
[(2.5630+2.5225+0.2560+12.86+11.38) 0.15
0.05] 1.1
2.7
19
Wood treatment (fire and
micro-biological) protection
kg 50 50
Enclosure
20
Exterior OSB sheathing,
20mm
m
2
(13.4-1.9) 6.4+13.4 3.1+(13.4-1.9) 3.3 153
21
Exterior walls thermal
insulation, rigid mineral
wool plates 50mm, density
85 kg/m
m
2
(13.4-1.9)6.4+13.43.1+(13.4-1.9)3.3+0.36.48 169
22
Exterior stucco finishing on
fibber glass mesh
m
2
(13.4-1.9)6.4+13.43.1+(13.4-1.9)3.3+0.36.48 169
23
Wall thermal insulation
mineral wool 50mm,
density 40 kg/m
m
2
(13.4-1.9)6.4+13.43.1+(13.4-1.9)3.3 153
24
Perforated masonite board,
t=4mm
m
2
[(13.4-1.9)6.4+13.43.1+(13.4-1.9)3.3]1.1 168
25 Vapour barrier m
2
[(13.4-1.9)6.4+13.43.1+(13.4-1.9)3.3]1.3 199
26
Partition walls insulation
mineral wool 100mm,
density 40 kg/m
m
2
5.822.55+4.832.55 66.3
27
Roof terrace thermal
insulation, tapered foam
glass
m
2
71.5 71.5
28
Roof terrace hydro-
insulation membrane, 2
layers reinforced
bituminous membrane,
m
2
6521.3 169
29 40 mm topsoil layer m
3
650.04 2.6
30 Metal flashing m
2
9.81.3 12.7
Finishing
31
Drywall sheets on light-
gauge steel structure
m
2
[(5.754+3.62+0.436+1.9) 2.55+
(5.754+9.7+4.94+42)2.55] 1.1
261
32
Drywall ceiling-lining with
light gauge steel structures
m
2
5.44+21.2+5.5+20.6+13.4+3.5+3.7+4.8+13.5+11.6 119
33
Flooring underlay, cork
plates, glued to concrete
slab, t= 30mm
m
2
3.5+13.4+11.6+13.5 42
34 Laminated flooring m
2
21.2+3.5+13.4+11.6+13.5+2 65.2
35
Floor ceramic tiles,
including adhesive, grout
and trims
m
2
5.44+5.5+20.6+3.7+4.8 56.2
AFFORDABLE HOUSES PROJECT The Politehnica University of Timisoara,
Final Project and Design WP2 Romania
20
ArcelorMittal Lige
Research and Development
36
Wall ceramic tiles,
including adhesive, grout
and trims
m
2
4.050.7+7.62+9.42 37
37
Bituminous membrane
under the floor ceramic tiles
m
2
(3.7+4.8) 1.3 11.1
38
Painted interior walls, base
coat + 2 paint coats/acrylic
paint
m
2
261+119-37 343
39 Exterior wall smoothing m
2
(13.4-1.9)6.4+13.43.1+(13.4-1.9)3.3+0.36.48 169
40
Painted exterior walls, base
coat+2 layers exterior
acrylic paint
m
2
(13.4-1.9)6.4+13.43.1+(13.4-1.9)3.3+0.36.48 169
41
Glazed walls, with mobile
openings
m
2
5.64.92+4.92.554+1.92.43 118.5
42
Interior doors, complete
with door trims
m
2
0.82.14+1.62.12 13.4
D.2.1.h. Achieved quality and performance
The quality and performance achieved are referred to:
- Enhanced quality of design and construction, and safety standards;
- Diversity of solutions for layout and envelope design;
AFFORDABLE HOUSES PROJECT The Politehnica University of Timisoara,
Final Project and Design WP2 Romania
21
ArcelorMittal Lige
Research and Development
- Modularity;
- Faster fabrication and erection;
- Easy to combine with timber and other materials;
- Thermo efficiency of cladding system (ease adaptable to client demands and in-time
improvement);
- Allows for a more accurate budget estimate and cost control;
- Allows for a large variety of finishing;
- Overall lower construction cost;
- Sustainable solution; complete recycling of the steel frame structure and trapezoidal
corrugated steel sheet for floor decks;
- Enhanced ambient quality and significant savings on the energy bill (including
advantage for natural light, natural ventilation).
AFFORDABLE HOUSES PROJECT The Politehnica University of Timisoara,
Final Project and Design WP2 Romania
22
ArcelorMittal Lige
Research and Development
D2.2. Socio economical assessment
D.2.2.a. Economical evaluation
Economic evaluation starts the construction budget for the house alone.
Nevertheless, the total investment cost for the property has to include the price of land
(price of the land depends on the location), utilities, landscape features, design and legal fees as
well as applicable taxes. For an actual economic evaluation, all this parameters have to be
introduced in the equation. The difficulty is that, usually, the comparison yardstick on the market
is only the builders selling price/sqm. Thats why putting together a complete financing package
from the start, it is a challenge.
The demand for mortgage loans increased slightly in the third quarter, aided by the First
Home scheme which failed to provide a strong stimulus to the market and hence made little
difference.
The Prima Casa (First House) program aimed at helping young people and young
couples to acquire a home. For a 60,000 loan, the program is directed only to certain segments
of the population, with monthly incomes above 4,500 lei (approx. 1,000). The eligible
situations are:
- Individuals who do not have a home (e.g. apartment or house), individually or jointly
with their spouses or other persons, regardless of how this property was acquired;
- Persons who are not in place a mortgage;
- Individuals or families who meet the conditions imposed by donors;
- People able to pay in advance at least 5% of the purchase price of the house, if the
price is less than or equal to 60,000, e.g. 3,000. In case the price of the house is
higher, then 3,000 plus the difference between the purchase price of property and
60,000. The maximum reimbursement period is 30 years;
- The interest rate applied to the loans granted through this program is variable,
namely: ROBOR 3M + 2%, for the loans in lei and EURIBOR 3M + 3,75% for EUR
(e.g. see www.banca-romaneasca.ro).
D.2.2.b. Comparison with traditional housing concept and material
The proposed architectural design is versatile to the point that it can evolve to either
towards a modern or vernacular expression. The difference when compare with a traditional
house is more of technological nature than morphological ones.
In respect to architectural form and expression, the solutions presented here show that the
concept is adaptable to a variety of urban and suburban configuration, i.e.: flat roof, pitched roof,
variation of colour palette etc.
D.2.2.c. Achieved cost reduction
Cost reduction has to be compared with a traditional housing concept having the same size
and morphology. While discussing cost reduction is paramount to recognize that a traditional
AFFORDABLE HOUSES PROJECT The Politehnica University of Timisoara,
Final Project and Design WP2 Romania
23
ArcelorMittal Lige
Research and Development
house built to the same standards as the proposed design, comes to a higher price than the
current offer on the market.
The 400/sqm. price represents actually a low price for a house located in an urban area,
even for a traditional solution. On the other hand, it is difficult to imagine a traditional house at
such a price of a comparable quality as the one achieved by the present project.
D.2.2.d. Social advantages
The proposed design, detailed for a unit of 150 sqm. is intended to address young couples,
couples with one, two children, or couples with their parents. The living area is large enough to
accommodate more simultaneous activities. The one storey unit of 75 sqm. addresses primarily
the young couples as a first home.
The possibility to erect the house into two phases (see D.2.1.a: Phase 1: house type 1
designed to support structurally another floor; Phase 2: addition of a new floor) encourages
young families to benefit for attractive financing programme to build new homes.
If we were to go further into urban planning, one could envisage neighbourhoods made of
such affordable houses, which could concentrate a younger population which in turn could
support a range of retail outlets and services.
D.2.2.e. Possible deployment
As explained in D.2.2.a, the financing package for an affordable house, according to the
present project, could be covered by the First home program (Programul Prima cas).
A most important issue is land acquisition. Given the selling price of land plots before
2009, followed by the sharp decrease, one could expect a slow recovery. Going prices for land
plots today, are 30-40% lower than before 2009. Even though, for a young couple, land
acquisition, becomes a big problem, as banks do not finance it.
A system which was and is still used is to build on concessioned land with an agreement
for 50 years, renewable another 49.
Providing an appropriate location and a financial package, the construction of the
prototype becomes available and will definitely be the necessary step leading to implementation
of the project.
D.2.2.f. Possibility for demonstration
Following the idea of building on concessioned land, a reasonable way to demonstrate the
concept, would be to build show-homes in the new planned developments, built either by the
financing party or by the one owning the land, or by both, as an incentive to buy the product.