CHEMICAL REACTORS

he chemical reactor is the heart of any chemical process. Chemical processes turn

inexpensive chemicals into valuable ones, and chemical engineers are the only people technically trained to understand and handle them. While separation units are usually the largest components of a chemical process, their purpose is to purify raw materials before they enter the chemical reactor and to purify products after they leave the reactor. Here is a very generic flow diagram of a chemical process. Raw materials from another chemical process or purchased externally must usually be purified to a suitable composition for the reactor to handle. After leaving the reactor, the unconverted reactants, any solvents, and all byproducts must be separated from the desired product before it is sold or used as a reactant in another chemical process. The key component in any process is the chemical reactor; if it can handle impure raw materials or not produce impurities in the product, the savings in a process can be far greater than if we simply build better separation units. In typical chemical processes the capital and operating costs of the reactor may be only 10 to 25% of the total, with separation units dominating the size and cost of the process. Yet the performance of the chemical reactor totally controls the costs and modes of operation of these expensive separation units, and thus the chemical reactor largely controls the overall economics of most processes. Improvements in the reactor usually have enormous impact on upstream and downstream separation processes. Design of chemical reactors is also at the forefront of new chemical technologies. The major challenges in chemical engineering involve 3 4 Introduction 1. Searching for alternate processes to replace old ones, 2. Finding ways to make a product from different feedstocks, or 3. Reducing or eliminating a troublesome byproduct. The search for alternate technologies will certainly proceed unabated into the next century as feedstock economics and product demands change. Environmental regulations create continuous demands to alter chemical processes. As an example, we face an urgent need to reduce the use of chlorine in chemical processes. Such processes (propylene to propylene oxide, for example) typically produce several pounds of salt (containing considerable water and organic impurities) per pound of organic product that must be disposed of in some fashion. Air and water emission limits exhibit a continual tightening that shows no signs of slowing down despite recent conservative political trends.

CHEMICAL REACTION ENGINEERING

Since before recorded history, we have been using chemical processes to prepare food, ferment grain and grapes for beverages, and refine ores into utensils and weapons. Our ancestors used mostly batch processes because scaleup was not an issue when one just wanted to make products for personal consumption. The throughput for a given equipment size is far superior in continuous reactors, but problems with transients and maintaining quality in continuous equipment mandate serious analysis of reactors to prevent expensive malfunctions. Large equipment also creates hazards that backyard processes do not have to contend with. Not until the industrial era did people want to make large quantities of products to sell, and only then did the economies of scale create the need for mass production. Not until the twentieth century was continuous processing practiced on a large scale. The first practical considerations of reactor scaleup originated in England and Germany, where the first large-scale chemical plants were constructed and operated, but these were done in a trial-and-error fashion that today would be unacceptable. The systematic consideration of chemical reactors in the United States originated in the early twentieth century with DuPont in industry and with Walker and his colleagues at MIT, where the idea of reactor units arose. The systematic consideration of chemical

reactors was begun in the 1930s and 1940s by Damkohler in Germany (reaction and mass transfer), Van Heerden in Holland (temperature variations in reactors), and by Danckwerts and Denbigh in England (mixing, flow patterns, and multiple steady states). However, until the late 1950s the only texts that described chemical reactors considered them through specific industrial examples. Most influential was the series of texts by Hougen and Watson at Wisconsin, which also examined in detail the analysis of kinetic data and its application in reactor design. The notion of mathematical modeling of chemical reactors and the idea that they can be considered in a systematic fashion were developed in the 1950s and 1960s in a series of papers by Amundson and Aris and their students at the University of Minnesota. In the United States two major textbooks helped define the subject in the early 1960s. The first was a book by Levenspiel that explained the subject pictorially and included a large range of applications, and the second was two short texts by Aris that concisely described the mathematics of chemical reactors. While Levenspiel had fascinating updates