Cognitive model of the epistemologies:

the experience of codification.

Ferdinand Phatykh ( 1997-2013. ERGONICA CENTRE Ltd, Moscow), E-mail:
ergocentre@mtu-net.ru

Abstract: Based on the analysis of Knowledge Representation Paradigm of the

Nature, Society and Individuality under the perspective of "cognitive metaphor" the
Knowledge System Codification in a form of " The Epistemologies Table" is proposed.
It helps to construct the integrated approach for the metaknowledge classification.
That is a necessary paradigm, in the "structurating" frames of which the
investigating objects may be represented, the purposes of project may be
formulated, researches and applications may be coordinated.
Keywords: Epistemologies Table, Representational Paradigm, Cognitive Metaphor,
Metaknowledge, Congruence (Methodical, Subject, Projection).
To the attention of the expert researchers community in the "cognitive metaphor"
field of application of modern science is proposed the scheme ("Epistemologies
Table"), which, in our view, structures systematically the space of scientific
research in a wide range. A conditional "dimensions" of the space are the Object (the
object, discipline, discourse) and its representational paradigm (positivistic, semiotic
-language system, "individuated" (subjective)), see Table 1. Epistemologies Table.
Epistemologies names correspond to the areas of the knowledge, which is defined by
the object representation paradigm ("construct"), although at this moment of their
nomination fairly conventional. On the base of this classification has placed "a
modern cognitive scheme of the cognitive processes, in one form or another
element codifies a "subjectivity" of the knowledge.
Table 1. Epistemologies Table.

Subject||
Representatio
n paradigm
Positivist pragmatic

Nature

Society

System Fractal-synergies and Intellectual and

probability laws
reflexive-game
Constructivist
and models in the
models
models
language of
mathematics

Cultural and
Discursive and Disciplines in scale
Positivist
Ideological
discourses
Linguistic

Religious and
value-"individua
ted"

Individuality/me
n

Creationist"

and legitimating

"World view"
typologies

Social-Role
individualized
discourse

Hermeneuticdiscip-linary
discourses
Individuated
superdiskurs

Applied purpose of using "table epistemologies" - codification / classification

metaknowledge as necessary paradigm in structuring within which represents the
object under study, formulate goals of project tasks, coordinated research and
applications.

The main advantage of this codification - the ability to integrate a very wide range
of efforts of many agents, "production of knowledge" by a kind of "meta-language of
the new" cognitive processes. Proposed above is only the first step in the
development and use of a new "cognitive resources". [1,2].
Rules codification (as systems of representations of subject and problem areas in
the form of models, disciplines and discourses) table-based epistemology:
1. Establishment of facilities and representation paradigms for Themes
(Methodological congruence).
2. Structuring of the source data and knowledge on the paradigmatic features
(system-subject congruence).
3. Comparison of the requirements for the "exit" of the project to the results of the
first two of the above rules (Project congruence).
Conclusions:
The above proposed approach to the "epistemologies systematizing" can be useful
for the cognitive-oriented researchers in the methodological, technique and applied
aspects.
We will be happy to further cooperation in the concrete projects!
References:
1. Matthew Jelavic. Socio-Technical Knowledge Management and Epistemological
Paradigms: Theoretical Connections at the Individual and Organisational Level.//
Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management Volume 6,
2011, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
http://www.ijikm.org/Volume6/IJIKMv6p001-016Jelavic508.pdf
2. .. . //
. . (. . ), 2(18),
2012, .5-12.

In Russian

:
.
167.7:165.194/.433/.7/.8 + 316.259/.258/.276/.277/.286
.
, " "
" ".

,
,
, .
: ,
, " ", ,
(, - , ).

 ( -), ,
,
.
(, , )
(, -,
()), . 1. .
, -
(),
.
,
.

1. .

,
-

/ ,
,
,
. [1, 2].


.

.
(
, )
:
1.
( ).
2.
(- ).
3.
( ).

:

-
, .

!
:
1. Matthew Jelavic. Socio-Technical Knowledge Management and Epistemological
Paradigms: Theoretical Connections at the Individual and Organisational Level.//
Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management Volume 6,
2011, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.
http://www.ijikm.org/Volume6/IJIKMv6p001-016Jelavic508.pdf
2. .. . //
. . (. . ), 2(18),
2012, .5-12.
Ferdinand Phatykh ( 1997-2013. ERGONICA CENTRE Ltd, Moscow), E-mail:
ergocentre@mtu-net.ru