The original doc. at http://freeassemblage.blogspot.

com/2009/04/un-human-rights-
council-votes-to.html contains hyperlinks to references.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

U.N. Human Rights Council Votes to Prevent Free Speech

>It would seem now that Islam and the Human Rights Council is legitimately
associated with the violations of free speech.<

Muslim countries have been pressing for a United Nations Human Rights Council
resolution calling on nations around the world to pass laws criminalizing the
alleged “defamation” of religion – specifically Islam.

This week the Council passed the resolution.

A simple majority of 23 members of the 47-nation Human Rights Council voted in

favor of the resolution. Eleven mostly Western nations opposed it and 13 countries
abstained. "It is individuals who have rights and not religions," said Canadian
diplomat Terry Cormier. Canada's criticism was echoed by European Union countries,
all of which voted against the proposal.

"Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and
terrorism," the resolution said. It would seem now that Islam and the Human Rights
Council is legitimately associated with the violations of free speech.

The United States did not vote on the resolution because it is not a member of the
council. The Bush administration announced it was virtually giving up on the body
and would participate in debates only if absolutely necessary because of the
council's anti-Israel statements and its failure to act on abuses in Sudan and
elsewhere.

The proposal by Pakistan had drawn strong criticism from free-speech campaigners
and liberal democracies. The resolution urges states to provide "protection
against acts of hatred, discrimination, intimidation and coercion resulting from
defamation of religions and incitement to religious hatred in general."

Muslim nations have argued that religions, in particular Islam, must be shielded
from criticism in the media and other areas of public life. They cited cartoons
depicting the Prophet Muhammad as an example of unacceptable free speech.

But the "laws" or cannons of one religion should not be binding on people of other
faiths, nor even upon those within the faith who disagree. In many cases, however,
Muslim Shura, a form of social rules backed up by, in many cases, Sharia Law,
forces other Muslims to adhere to the wishes of the community.
http://www.alhewar.com/SadekShura.htm

India, which normally votes along with the council's majority of developing
nations, abstained in protest at the fact that Islam was the only religion
specifically named as deserving protection.

Efforts by the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) have paid off in
getting such a resolution passed – and we can count on the OIC to continue its
global campaign to criminalize free speech that allegedly “defames” Islam.

Condensed and edited from

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iRHXSIoJJdXQpG3kPrRO2LWMnWTAD975
SKN01 and http://www.actforamerica.org/index.php/learn/recent-news
The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists is the sm of
The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists LLC.
The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism tm,
The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger ©,
Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger Extra ©, and
The Metaphysical Naturalist ©,
are the educational arms of the LLC and are:
© 2008-2009 by Curtis Edward Clark and Naturalist Academy Publishing tm
mailto:freeassemblage@gmail.com