Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
TABLE OF CONTENTS: History Fast Facts Technology Leadership Growth Products and Services Industry and Competitive Analysis Dominant Economic Characteristics Driving Forces
SWOT Analysis
Diversification Efforts Financial Analysis Strategic Issues Identifications and Recommendations Reference
Page 2
History
Hewlett-Packard was started in 1939 by Dave Packard and Bill Hewlett in a small one car garage behind Packards house. At the time it was started HP had $538 in working capital and little more than a couple hundred dollars worth of assets. It was in this garage that HPs legacy was born, when Bill and Dave created the first HP product the Audio Oscillator HP200A. Following the invention of their first product, the pair moved into a small building down the road from their famed garage and hired their first employees. The first true purchase of HPs products came when Walt Disney ordered 8 of the audio oscillators for use in production of its movies. Another milestone was reached in 1940 when HP sent out its first ever Christmas bonus in the amount of $5. This Christmas bonus set the tone for all bonuses to come, as it quickly turned into a production bonus and soon helped to shape the company wide profit sharing plan that HP adapts. In 1942 HP builds its first ever company owned building, and in order to protect themselves, build it so that it can be easily converted to a convenience store should the electronics industry fail. One of the most important milestones for the company was reached in 1947 as HP became a true Corporation. HP also caught attention for their Management by Walking Around and Open Door Policy programs. In 1957 HP had its initial public offering of stock and wrote their first set of corporate objectives which set the tone for their management style as a company. In 1958 HP made its first sizeable acquisition when they purchased F.L. Moseley Company which further expanded their product line. The late 50s and 60s were an extremely important time for HP as a company as it was during this time that they became a global company by building a manufacturing plant in Germany. It was also during this time that they created their Division Separation structure where they separated profit and loss accountability between divisions. This division was thought to help keep employees nimble while fostering motivation and creativity. They also had their stock listed on the New York and Pacific Stock exchanges and were listed in Fortune 500s top companies at 460. It was also during the 60s that HP created its first computer, which was used in house to control company tests. HP also creates their first scientific calculator around this time which gains critical success. In the early 80s HP took much more interest in the personal computing industry as it was during this time that they create the first mass marketed personal computer. They also enter into creating printers for use with their personal computers, the printers HP manufactured during this time set the standard for the direction in which printers would evolve. In 1987 Bill Hewlett retired as vice chairman of the board of directors, his son Walter Hewlett and David W Packard (son of Dave Packard) step up to take his place. In 1992 Lew Platt became HP president and CEO who was the first president and CEO of HP to not be a member of the Hewlett or Packard family. In 1993 Dave Packard relinquishes his chair of the board of directors position to Lew Platt. Possibly one of the most damaging events hits HP in 1996 when Dave Packard one of the original founders dies. In 1999 Carly Fiorina becomes President and CEO of HP. In 2002 HP merged with Compaq Computer. This merger created an $87 billion entity which operates in more than
Macro Economics, SEC: M2 R.No: 98 Page 3
Fast Facts
HP was incorporated in 1939. Corporate headquarters are in Palo Alto, Calif. Meg Whitman is president and CEO. Its merger with Compaq in 2002, and the acquisition of EDS in 2008, which led to combined revenues of $118.4 billion in 2008 and a Fortune 500 ranking of 9 in 2009. Revenue US$ 120.357 billion (2012) Operating US$ -11.057 billion (2012) income Net income US$ -12.650 billion (2012) Total assets US$ 108.768 billion (2012) Total equity US$ 22.436 billion (2012) Employees 311,610 (2012) Divisions Financing, Hardware, Services, Software
Technology Leadership
HP's three business groups drive industry leadership in core technology areas: The Personal Systems Group: business and consumer PCs, mobile computing devices and workstations The Imaging and Printing Group: inkjet, LaserJet and commercial printing, printing supplies, digital photography and entertainment The Technology Solutions Group: business products including storage and servers, managed services and software.
Growth
HP is focused on three technology shifts that have the power to transform our customers' lives and businesses. Next-generation data center Always on, always connected mobile computing Ubiquitous printing and imaging.
Macro Economics, SEC: M2 R.No: 98 Page 4
Page 5
This strategic map shows that at this time Hewlett-Packard holds the highest market share worldwide in their industry due mostly to the fact that they are the most diversified firm. They are quickly followed by Dell who isnt as diversified, but who base most of their sales on computers and like HP hold a relatively lower price with the plan of offering a lower cost for a higher quality product. Apple Inc. holds the highest price as they are firm believers in providing the best quality even if it costs them more since they are a fully differentiated firm. Apples new campaigns against PCs is proving to be working as their market share is rising, but at the end of 2007 hadnt quite reached the amount of Dell, or HP, but they are still doing extremely well as they do not rely on as many different product lines as Dell and HP to create these sales. IBM is basically solely based upon servers for businesses so they do not have as much diversification, but they base their company on a slightly higher price, but offer excellent quality in their products as well as service. Gateway is the lowest on all accounts being based fully on computers. They focus on having extremely low prices with their eMachine line, but they are not seeing the market share of the other businesses due to past problems with their computers.
Page 6
Page 7
The peripheral portion of the industry has depended on standardization for its continued growth. Activities such as a standard drivers, motherboards, sockets, and connectors have enabled companies to create peripherals which are usable across the industry in most types of computer systems. . Competitive forces within the industry are remarkably strong as many companies look to overpower their competitors. Major competitors in the market include HP and Dell who at the present time are conquering much of the industry and also Gateway, Sony, E-Machine and Apple. Depending upon the segment, IBM and Sun are competitors also included in this industry. Competition is cut throat in the industry as product differentiation is relatively nonexistent at this point. All companies offer customizable products, however the customization options between companies are all relatively the same. It is safe to say that products are rather weakly differentiated. Companies who are looking to enter into the industry are typically unable to do so as large capital requirements are needed. Companies who wish to compete on a global scale with Hewlett-Packard and Dell are going to find that it is impossible to get started and get their name out. The larger companies have not only the name brand recognition but they can also partake in economies of scale purchases as they may be able to buy a million motherboards whereas a smaller company may only be able to buy ten thousand. Companies who are looking to enter into the peripheral market and compete against companies such as SanDisk on the other hand have a much easier time as the capital requirements are far less and consumers are more easily swayed to buy non name brand products for purchases. These smaller companies may also be able to use economies of scale as they may be able to purchase a larger quantity of a particular part for their products as they may not cost as much capital. While it is relatively hard to enter the market, depending in which segment you plan to partake in, it is easy to remove yourself from the industry. Typically competitors are more than willing to buy each other out as that will mean less competition in the industry. HP completing its purchase of competitor Compaq is a good example of the ease in which a company can exit the industry.
Macro Economics, SEC: M2 R.No: 98 Page 8
Driving Forces
There are many driving forces in the Computer & Peripherals industry that a company pursuing profits must acknowledge. One of the main driving forces is innovation. Customers are always looking for the next big product to hit the market that they can take advantage of in their everyday lives. Products such as wireless keyboards and small flash drives or jump drives as they are called have had a significant impact on the way consumers conduct their lives in relation to their use of computers. These small drives allow for ease of mobility between computers, allowing users to transport their all important files between their machines. Price is also a very significant force in the industry as consumers are constantly looking for the best possible machines at the lowest possible price. Price is an important driving force especially at the current time due to a weak economy and people spending more money than ever on necessitates which leaves them with less money for buying extra goods. Large corporations who are one of the greatest consumers of computers and peripherals are experiencing large setbacks due to the current market situation, this is causing those large corporations to be tighter with their expenditures and reducing the amount of product that they can and will buy. With the majority of the population being of an age where they have had little to no contact with computers it is also extremely important that computers be simple and easy to use. Those from the baby boom era are typically less inclined to be able to use computers to their full potential because of the computers complicated nature. Another aspect that tends to drive much of society in todays day and age is the greening of many products. Computer manufacturers dont escape the pressure of environmentally minded people. Manufacturers must keep in mind that at some point the computers and peripherals that they produce will need to be disposed of, and they must be ready for the disposal of those products. Computer makers must also be mindful of the electric energy that is needed to run their computersthough this is not a factor in all consumer purchases, it is still a factor that does play a part in purchase habits of some consumers. The continual replacement factor of products in this industry also drives and shapes the industry. The main productsdesktops, notebooks and other hardwareare continually evolving and as a result consumers and companies are continually upgrading and changing their systems. This continual evolution of the products has consumers pushing for easier upgrade methods and some standardization.
Page 9
Opportunities
Expansion in Emerging Markets Innovation/R&D Partnerships (Celebrities, Other Companies) Gaining Market Share Integrated Bid Desk Technology is a strong market Gaming industry
Weaknesses
Account Management Software Complacency No real specialization
Threats
Self Destruction Intense Competition Poor Economy Specialization
Page 10
Financial Analysis
Overview
Chart 1: Stock Performance Over 5 Years
After a strong financial performance from 2005 to 2010, HP significantly underperformed the S&P 500 benchmark in 2011. Investors have voiced concerns about dropping margins in hardware products - HPs bread and butter, costly acquisitions such as Autonomy, leadership churning, and a lack of coherent strategy. The stock price has taken a hit accordingly: HP is down 30% over the last 5 years, compared with the market which is only down 5%.
Macro Economics, SEC: M2 R.No: 98 Page 11
In 2011, HP saw its net income shrink by 19.26%, despite a modest 1% increase in sales over the same period. Earnings per share were $3.32 compared with a stock price of $26.61, giving HP a price to earnings ratio of 8.02 at the end of the fiscal year. Compared with an industry median of 17.12, HP could be seen as either undervalued or underperforming. The distinction lies in ones outlook on HPs future growth prospects.
Page 12
In 2011, HP had overall revenues of $130B and net income of $7.2B. This represents a 1% increase in revenue from 2010 and a 30% increase over 2007, but a 20% drop in net income from 2010 and no change from net income in 2007. Cash flow actually increased from $12B to $13B from 2010 to 2011, and increased about 20% over a five year period, but doesnt give a true picture of HPs lackluster performance in the last year. The downward trend in net income must be reversed in the upcoming quarters or HPs stock price will suffer.
Page 15
Reference:
http://www.linkedin.com/company/hewlett-packard/products?sort=&start=1 http://www.vyoms.com/company-profiles/hp.asp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewlett-Packard http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/about-hp/history/history.html
Page 16