Wiki of Science: 20130117 - Safety management systems in aviation maintenance - 1997

Site: Wiki of Science at http://wikiofscience.wikidot.com Source page: 20130117 - Safety management systems in aviation maintenance - 1997 at http://wikiofscience.wikidot.com/print:20130117-sms-in-amo-mcdonald1997

20130117 - Safety management systems in aviation maintenance - 1997

[Data] [<Normal page] [PEREZGONZALEZ Jose D [ed] (2012). Safety management systems in aviation maintenance. Knowledge (ISSN 2324-1624), 2013, pages 8-10.]

AMO's SMS
McDonald et al (19971) analyzed how four aircraft maintenance organizations (AMOs)2 managed safety, with particular emphasis on current safety management systems and organizational culture.

Fold Table of Contents AMO's SMS Methods Research approach Data Materials and analysis

A qualitative assessment of the properties of the safety management system (SMS) of the four AMOs is tabulated in illustration 1. It shows that the four organizations had distinctive safety management styles as well as different safety cultures. Organization C appeared as the AMO with the best safety management system, better climate and most favorable disciplinary actions, although it also had a relatively high level of violations of task procedures. Organization A and organization B were somewhere in the middle in regards to the quality of their SMS and cultures. Finally, organization D was the AMO with the worst safety management system, with safety climate and attitudes slightly lower than the rest, and with a poor disciplinary culture.

Illustration 1: Elements of safety management across four aircraft maintenance organizations SMS elements Safety policy Safety standards Planning & documentation Management training Auditing Reporting Incident investigation Feedback Change Climate & attitudes Safety climate Safety attitudes Good Good Good Partly effective Statutory Backlogged Good Good Good A Slightly positive Better A Basic Basic Improving Inconsistent Basic Starting Ineffective Ineffective Ineffective B Negative Better B C Strong Strong Strong Effective Strong Starting Strong Strong Strong C Positive Better D Ineffective Basic Ineffective Ineffective Statutory Poor Absent Poor Absent D Slightly negative Good

Wiki of Science: 20130117 - Safety management systems in aviation maintenance - 1997

Disciplinary actions3 Impartial investigation Incident discussed Verbal reprimand None Disciplinary hearing Suspension of license Suspension of job Task procedures Reported violations 30% 53% 40% 10% 3% 45% 15% 19%

A 35% 23% 10% 4% 23% 51% 9% A 36%

C 62% 51% 15% 0% 35% 8% 3% 28% 33% 7% 3% 37% 18% 13% C 37% 47%

Although little can be generalized from this particular research, the results do describe a situation were safety management and safety culture did not appear standardized among organizations doing similar jobs and having similar responsibilities for aviation safety. That is, safety management, at least at the time of the research, appeared quite variable across organizations. On the other hand, safety management appeared as quite consistent within each organization, further suggesting that the quality of both the management system and the safety culture was idiosyncratic to each organization and permeated all levels in that organization.

Methods
Research approach
Exploratory study.

Data
The research was done in four aircraft maintenance organizations2, including content analysis of documentation and sampling different groups of people within each organization.

Materials and analysis

Materials included content analysis of relevant documentation, semi-structured interviews with management personnel, and several surveys filled in by different groups of personnel. The researchers used a variety of qualitative and quantitative analytical tools to support a final qualitative assessment of the safety management of the four AMOs.

References
1. McDONALD Nicholas, Siobhan CORRIGAN, Colin DALY & Sam CROMIE (1997). Safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organisations. Safety Science (ISSN 0925-7535), 2000, volume 34, pages 151-176. +++ Notes +++
2. Nowadays referred to as MROs, meaning either 'maintenance and repair organizations', or 'maintenance, repair and overhaul organizations'. 3. Percentages of respondents who expected each particular disciplinary action by the organization as consequence of an incident or accident. Percentages are mostly estimated from eye-balling a chart, as only a few of those were reported in the article.

Wiki of Science: 20130117 - Safety management systems in aviation maintenance - 1997

Want to know more?

FAA - Safety Management System This FAA website provides more information about safety management systems in aviation. Wiki of Science - Safety management systems in aviation maintenance (descriptive statistics) This Wiki of Science page provides in-depth descriptive analyses of above information, and a ranking of the overall quality of each organization's management system.

Editors
Jose D PEREZGONZALEZ (2012). Massey University, Turitea Campus, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. ( JDPerezgonzalez). nuuckie (2012) ( nuuckie).

Like

Other interesting sites

Journal KAI

Wiki of Science

AviationKnowledge

A4art

The Balanced Nutrition Index

page revision: 2, last edited: 14 Nov 2012, 10:18 (8 seconds ago)

Unless stated otherwise Content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License