Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
We have seen Meryl Dorey adopt some loony ideas in the past, but this one takes the cake.
But first some background. “Black Salve” is an alternative- medicine concoction containing
sanguinarine, which comes from Bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis), and sometimes zinc
chloride. It has been sold in Australia as an alternative treatment for cancer, including skin
cancer.
Black Salve is highly corrosive, highly dangerous, does not discriminate between cancerous
tissue and healthy tissue, and relies on the user to self-diagnose, self-prescribe, self-
administer and self-monitor. Read more about it at Quackwatch.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration has issued a warning advising consumers against
purchasing or using black salve. The pharmaceutical industry has developed far more
effective treatments, to be prescribed and administered by real doctors.
For all these reasons, Black Salve has found favour in the alternative medicine milieu, so of
course Meryl Dorey and the Australian Vaccination Network have recommended and
publicised it. Some of that publicising involved selling a DVD from the AVN shop and
spruiking it on radio.
Once the TGA were informed that Meryl Dorey and the AVN were on the Black Salve
bandwagon, they issued a recommendation to them to stop such irresponsible behaviour.
Of course Meryl Dorey contested that, as she is wont to do, and the following
correspondence outlines the discourse between them.
All very normal until you get to page 24. At this point Meryl Dorey stops using rational
argument and invokes the “Freeman Of The Land” defence. For those of you who have led
rational lives, this lunacy is the theory that a person can declare themselves to be, in effect,
a sovereign nation and not subject to law.
Of course it is rubbish, but Meryl Dorey’s use of it shows how tenuous her grip on reality is.
What follows is the correspondence between the TGA and Ms Dorey. Enjoy.
Ken McLeod
19 May 2013.
Australian Government
Mr Ken McLeod
PO Box 51
Moruya NSW 2537
Dear Mr McLeod
Notice of Decision
I refer to your request of 19 February 2013 under the Freedom ofInformation Act 1982 (the FOI
Act) for access to the following documents:
"... all correspondence between the TGA and the AVN [Australian Vaccination Network] and
Ms Meryl Dorey from 19 April 2012 until today [18 February 2013]."
Decision Maker
I am the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) officer authorised to make this decision under
the FOI Act. What follows is my decision under the FOI Act.
Background
On 19 February 2013 the TGA received a request from you, under the FOI Act.
On 27 February 2013 you were advised that the cost of processing your request amounted to
$168.05 and you were asked to pay a deposit of$42.01. You were also advised at this time ofthe
need to conduct a third party consultation in relation to your request.
On 12 March 2013 the TGA received a deposit in the amount of$42.01 for the processing of your
request. Along with your deposit you applied for a waiver of further charges on both public interest
and financial hardship grounds.
On 26 March 2013 third party consultation was initiated.
On 10 Apri12013 you were advised of my decision to waive any further charges (in excess ofthe
deposit paid) associated with the processing of your request.
PO Box 100 Woden ACT 2606 ABN 40 939 406 804 l1GAHealth Safety
Pho Ill': 02 6232 9444 Fdx: 0262329605 1111,111 info@tga.gov.au VVWW. tga,goV.d II Regulation
Decision
My decision in relation to the documents falling within the scope ofthe FOI request is to release
thirteen (13) documents in full. A schedule listing these documents along with the documents
themselves is at Attachment A.
In accordance with the Freedom oflriformation (Charges) Regulations 1982 (the Charges
Regulations) I have calculated the actual costs associated with processing your request. In this case,
the actual costs exceed the estimate of charges notified to you previously. However, as noted above,
on 10 April 2013, you were advised of my decision to waive the remaining charges associated with
the processing of your request, thus you are not required to pay any further charges and the
documents can be released to you immediately.
" ... all correspondence between the TGA and the Au..<;tralian Vaccination Network (AVN) and Ms Meryl Dorey from 19 April 2012 until today. "
By way of background information, this request relates to two complaints that have been lodged concerning the promotion of "Black Salve"
1. The first complaint was submitted on April 19th 2012, has the Code 2012/04/022, and the respondent was the AVN.
2. The second complaint was submitted on 13 th May 2012, has the Code 2012105/013, and the respondents were Ms Meryl Dorey and Mr
Leon Pittard.
The request is for documents dated between 19 April 2012 and 18 February 2013. It is for correspondence from AVN and Ms Dorey only in
relation to the named complaints.
1 2013/002066 20-21 Complaints Australian Vaccination 30 April 2012 Email advising advertiser 2 Release in full
Resolution Network of complaint
Panel
Release in full
2 2013/002066 22 James Fuggle Complaints Resolution 5 June 2012 Advertisers Response 1
Rummery Panel Form
Solicitors
Release in full
3 2013/002066 24 James Fuggle Complaints Resolution 9 May2012 Letter- Advertisers I
Rummery Panel response, request for
Solicitors extension
Release in full
4 2013/002066 26 James Fuggle Complaints Resolution 28 May 2012 Letter- Advertisers initial 1
Rummery
F6
o="
113
FOI 181-1213
FOI 181-1213
Ms Meryl Dorey
Dear Ms Dorey
The Complaints Resolution Panel" has been established under the Regulations (Regulation 42R) to consider
tdvertisements and generic information about designated therapeutic goods, medical devices and other therapeutic
goods, published in mainstream print, broadcast media including TV, radio and the internet, cinema and outdoor
The Complaints Resolution Panel (CRP) has received a complaint about an advertisement for Black Salve in
www.avn.org.au on 19 April 2012.
You should respond to the complaint. If you do not provide a response, the Panel may determine the
We interpretthe complaint as alleging brea~hes of section 42DL(1)(g) of the Act and sections 4(1 )(a), 4(1)(b), 4(2)(a),
4(2)b, 4(2)(c), 4(2)(d), 4(2)(e)(il), 4(2)(f), 4(2)(g), 4(2)(h), 4(2)(1), 4(4), 4(5), 4(7), 5(2) and 6(3) of the Code. You should
provide a response to each allegation.
Pursuant to regulation 42ZCAH, following a preliminary review of the complaint, please respond as well to each of the
following possible breaches or the Code, Regulations and/or Act:
• Section 42DL(1)(g) of the Act, because the advertisement promotes Black Salve for therapeutic use, when
these productls may not be included in the Register
• Section 5(1) of the Code because of representations about cancer
Pursuant to regulation 42ZCAE, the Panel requires you to produce evidence in support of claims made in the
advertisement. Please take this into account when preparing your response. Should you wish to provide supporting
material for any claims challenged, you must provide an explanation as to how the material supports the complaint
and identify relevant parts in the material. Please provide pivotal evidence to support the efficacy of the product with
r~~~:~t to the?l~i~~~~~j:ct to compl~i~t:"!he attached documents assist Y?LJiQPr.~p_~riI19l()urTf?~PQI1~f?,
In addition to responding to the particulars of the complaint as noted abQve, the Panel also requests that you provide
the following:
After the parties have received a copy of the final written determination of the Panel concerning this complaint, that
determination will be made available to the public on request and will be included on the website www.tgacrp.com.au
under "Complaint Register". Before making the determination public in these ways, the identity of the complainant will
be omitted if the complainant has so requested. Also, any information accepted by the Panel as confidential will be
omitted.
The TGA observer to the Panel appointed by the TGA may be entitled to use any information provided to the Panel
(whether confidential or not) pursuant to section 61 (8) of the Therapeutic Goods Act.
When the Panel considers the complaint, it may decide to raise other matters. If it does so, you will be notified in
writing and asked to provide a further response.
If the complaint is found to be justified, you may be asked to withdraw the advertisement, withdraw certain
representations and not use them in future advertisements, publish corrective information or publish
retraction/s. Where the Panel requests withdrawal of representations, the validity of the representations will not
generally be reconsidered (per Regulation 42ZCAI(1)(d)) unle.ss:
• at least 12 months have elapsed since the Panel made its request or
• genuinely new evidence has become available that was not available at the time of the complaint.
Your response must b~ provided to the Panel no later than 14 May 2012. Should no response be received,
the Panel may, nevertheless, consider the complaint at its next meeting.
If you do not understand the complaint or are unsure as to how to respond, you may need to seek legal advice or the
advice of a regulatory consultant.
Attached for your information please find a copy of each of the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2007, the
Complaints Resolution Panel procedures and some relevant clauses from the therapeutic goods legislation. The
Code and procedures document also can be found on the website at www.tgacrp.com.au.
"In this correspondence, references to the Code, Regulations, and Act are references to the Therapeutic Goods
Advertising Code 2007, the ThElrapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 and the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. References
to the Register are references to the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. References to the Panel or the CRP
are references to the Complaints Resolution Panel. References to theTGA are references to the Therapeutic Goods
,dministration.
Yours Sincerely
Ernest Waldstein
for Judith Brimer, Executive Officer
Complaints Resolution Panel
PO Box 764, North Sydney 2059
(02)94602796· ... -.. . . . . .... - - . .
Fundamentals
Sydney Wed 20 June; Wed 24 October
Melbourne Fri 11 May; Thurs 22 November
~erth Fri 27 July
~delaide Wed 25 July
:srisbane Fri 25 May; Fri 9 November
\dvanced
;ydney Wed 19 September
2
Contact Information
Fletlse provide wrrent conlad Jnforfllatkm. For lndlvIduBlsl p/fAa$e $f(tte yOUI' namfllJndf;r "oompany name». {(you alii inlding undM a b/J$lnes8
I2
n81'M Q/l!Jase show both your indillJdoo/ name omd the ~slrleBIf name. I
eontam person (name and title) for this oomplalnt: fY\ S £.lLE~ 6PrR..~ JtJ GTOr0
Product:
ARTG 10:
Product: i ARTGID:
Product
ARTG 10:
Product:
ARTG ID:
.........-,.
.............
"
. ART(lIO~. . . . .
9 May, 2012
Judith Brimer
IlJ)
Executive Officer
Complaints Resolution panel
POBox 764
NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059
Dear Madam
Ms Dorey has recendy made contact with OUI office and engaged counsel, however, we
note that you requite a response to the complaint no later than 14 May 2012.
ellie. barrington@jfrlegal.com.au
4
James Fuggle Rummery
28 May, 2012
Judith Brimet
Executive Officer
Complaints Resolution panel
PO Box 764
NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059
Dear Madarn
We are instructed that-oU! client has 'Withdtawn the advertisements for the DVD entitled
'One Answer to Cancer', being the subject of the complaint, from their website.
Please advise whether it remains necessary for a fulsome response to the complaint,
which would very likely consume resources and time of the AVN, Ms Dorey and the
'-'U'L.u.~J.l4J.llU) Resolution Panel
Yours faithfully
JAMES FUGGLE RUMMERY
tJrj ~,
Dear Ms Barrington,
Please provide a full response to the complaint as requested in the letter sent to Ms Dorey on 30 April 2012 (copy
attached).
I note a request for an extension of time to respond to this complaint from 14 May to 28 May 2102 was requested by
you on 9 May 2012 and granted by telephone on 15 May 2012.
I'fease provide any further response you may wish to make no later than close of business on Tuesday 5 June 2012 as
the complaint will be considered by the Complaints Resolution Panel on Thursday 7 June.
Yours faithfully,
Judith Brimer
Executive Officer
Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code Council and
Complaints Resolution Panel
Tel: 0294602796
Fax: 02 9460 2798
Anita. Barbara pry Limited ABN:16 101 460833 an incorporated legal practice
5 June, 2012
Judith Brimer
Executive Officer
POBox: 764
Dear Madam
COMPLAINT 2012/04/022
In relation to the AVN, it is conceded that there are breaches of section 42DL(g) of the
Therapeutic Goods Act (fGA) and sections 4(1)(a), 4(2)(d), 4(2)00, 4(2)(i) and 4(5) of
the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code (the Code).
It is denied that there is a breach of section 4(2)(e)(ii) of the Code as the advertisement
never made any suggestion that a person with cancer would be worse off if they chose
not to take Black Salve.
A breach of section 42(2)(h) is denied as the advertisement does not claitn to be effective
in all cases ..
It is denied that there is any breach of section 4(4) of the Code as there was no scientific
information presented in the advertisement.
A breach of section 4(7) of the Code is denied as the advertisement did not contain any
testimonials.
There is no breach of section 5(1) of the Code as the adve:rtiscment does not fall within
the definition of a prohibited representation in Part 1 of Appendix 6, as it does not make
any representations regarding the diseases listed and neithe:r is it a sunscreen. Similarly,
there is no breach of section 5(2) of the Code as Black Salve is not a sunscreen by any
definition, neither is it obvious that cancer falls within Table 1 to Part 2 of Appendix 6.
Finally, a breach of section 6(3) of the Code is denied as the advertisement was for a
DVD not for the good itself.
MetylDorey
In relation to section 42DL(g) of the TGA and sections 4(1)(a), 4(1)(b), 4(2)(a), 4(2)(b)
4(2)(c), 4(2)(d), 4(2)(g), 4(2)(i) and 4(5) of the Code, no breaches are admitted.
The Complaint
We are instructed that the subject matter of the complaint is not the subject of any legal
proceedings that have not been fulally disposed of and neither was any approval required
for the publication of the advertisement and/or representations within it.
Yours faithfully
JAMESFUGGLERUMMERY
From:
Sent:
Josie Barisic
Tuesday, 4 December 2012 2:03 PM
7
To: 'meryl@avn.org.au' 7
Subject: Complaint 2012/04/042 Black Salve
Attachments: CRP 2012-04-022 Black Salve.pdf
Ms Meryl Dor~y
Australian Vaccination Network Inc
PO Box 177
BANGALOW NSW 2479
4 December 2012
Dear Ms Dorey
Please find attached a copy of the determination reached by the Complaints Resolution Panel after its
consideration of the above complaint at the meeting of the Panel held on 16 August 2012.
Please note that sub-regulations 42ZCAI(3) and (4) of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 permit the
Panel to make recommendations to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Ageing in the event of non
compliance with this determination.
Where a retractionhas been requested, please provide a copy of the proposed retraction for the Panel's
approval, before its publication or broadcast. Also subsequently provide a copy of the published or broadcast
retraction.
In practice, determinations that have not been complied with are referred to the Therapeutic Goods
Administration (TGA) for follow-up action. Referral to the TGA may result in an order being made under
Regulation 9 ofthe Therapeutic Goods Regulations to enforce compliance with the Panel's
determination. Non-compliance with this order could also result in suspension or cancellation of the product
'ntry from the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods.
Regulation 9 Orders issued by TGA for advertising complaint determinations finalised by the Panel after 1
November 2010 will be publicised on the TGA's website at http://www.tga.gov.au/advert/complaint
investigations. htm
Yours Sincerely
Josie Barisic
on behalf of Judith Brimer, Executive Officer
The dates for the 2013 TGACC Fundamentals and Advanced Seminars will be available soon
For information and enrolments go to www.tgacc.com.au/events
Ms Ellen Barrington
PO Box 95
4 December 2012
Dear Ms Barrington
I write to you in your capacity as acting for Australian Vaccination Network Inc.
Please find attached a copy ofthe determination reached by the Complaints Resolution Panel after its
consideration of the above complaint at the meeting of the Panel held on 16 August 2012.
Please note that sub-regulations 42ZCAI(3) and (4) of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 permit the
Panel to make recommendations to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Ageing in the event of non~
compliance with this determination.
Where a retraction has been requested, please provide a copy of the proposed retraction for the Panel's
approval, before its publication or broadcast. Also subsequently provide a copy of the published or broadcast
retraction.
In practice, determinations that have not been complied with are referred to the Therapeutic Goods
Administration (TGA) for follow-up action. Referral to the TGA may result in an order being made under
"'egulation 9 of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations to enforce compliance with the Panel's
determination. Non-compliance with this order could also result in suspension or cancellation of the product
Regulation 9 Orders issued by TGA for advertising complaint determinations finalised by the Panel after 1
November 2010 will be publicised on the TGA's website at http://www.tga.gov.au/advert/complaint
investigations.htm
Yours sincerely
Josie Barisic
on behalf of Judith Brimer, Executive Officer
The dates for the 2013 iGACC Fundamentafs and Advanced Seminars win be avallabie soon
For information and enrolments go to www.tgacc.com.aulevents
1
Your message
To:
Subject: Complaint 2012/04/022 Black Salve
Sent: Wednesday, December 05,201211:48:26 AM (UTC+10:00) Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney
Dear Ms Barrington,
The letter of recommendation from the Complaints Resolution Panel (and the annexures) were addressed to the
Secretary of the Department of Health & Ageing. A copy of the letter was provided to you as a courtesy so that you
would be aware of the recommendation.
Please now find attached, formal notice of the recommendation, pursuant to Regulation 42ZCAI.
Yours sincerely,
Judith Brimer
Executive Officer
Therapeutrc Goods Advertising Code Council and
Complaints Resolution Panel
Tel: 02 94602796
Fax: 02 9460 2798
Dear Ms Brimer
fortunately the annexures to the letter, being a copy ofthe determination and the material which you considered
when you made the determination about the complaint, were not attached to the letter. Would you please forward
these documents. .
Regards,
Yours faithfully,
Ellen Barrington
~
JAMES FUGGLE RUMMERY SOLICITORS
- - - Email: ellie.barrington@ifrlegal.com.au
Ph: (02) 6621 2475, Fax: (02) 6622 1402
14 February 2013
Dear Sirs}
'I rite to you in your capacity as acting on behalf of Meryl Dorey and the Australian Vaccination Network.
This note is to inform you that, in relation to the above complaint, the Complaints Resolution Panel has made
a recommendation to the Secretary per subregulations 42ZCAI(3) and (4) ofthe Therapeutic Goods
Regulations 1990.
Yours sincerely
Judith Brimer
Executive Officer
Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code Council and
Complaints Resolution Panel
Tel: 02 9460 2796
Fax; 02 9460 2798
Enrol at www.tgacc.com.au/events
Fundamentals
Sydney: Wed 20 March, Wed 19 June, Wed 16 October
Brisbane: Fri 24 May
Melbourne: Fri 10 May, Thurs 28 November
Adelaide: Mon 8 July
Perth: Fri 2 August
Advanced
Sydney: Wed 17 April, Wed 18 September
Brisbane: Fri 8 November
Melbourne: Fri 29 November
RESOLUTION PANEL
[ntegrity in Healthcare Advertising
Ellie Barrington
James Fuggle Rummery Solicitors
Levell, 73 Magellan Street
Lismore NSW 2480
18 February 2013
Dear Ms Barrington,
By letter dated 4 December 2012, the Panel Secretary sent to James Fuggle Rummery
Solicitors, acting on behalf of Australian Vaccination Network Inc, the person
responsible for the advertisement, a copy of the Panel's determination for the above
complaint, requesting the withdrawal of the advertisement subject of the complaints,
withdrawal of representations that are outlined in the determination, and the
publication of a retraction.
The Panel requested that evidence of compliance be provided within 14 days. The
determination drew the sponsor's attention to the provisions of sub-regulations
42ZCAI(3) and (4) which permit a recommendation to be made to the Secretary in the
event of non-compliance with a request of the Panel.
At its meeting of 17 January 2013, the Panel noted that no response to the
determination had been received. The Panel was satisfied that its determination for the
complaint had made findings of breaches of the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code
C1Code"), the Regulations, and/or the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 ("Act'·)~ and that the
sanctions requested in the determination were appropriate and necessary to address
those breaches.
Yours sincerely,
Judith Brimer
Executive Officer
Ms Meryl Dorey
Australian Vaccination l\Ietwork Inc
2 July 2012
Dear Ms Dorey
The Complaints Resolution Panel* has been established under the Regulations (Regulation 42R) to consider
advertisements and generic information about designated therapeutic goods, medical devices and other therapeutic
goods, published in mainstream print, broadcast media including TV, radio and the internet, cinema and outdoor
media (Regulation 42ZCAB). Complaints must be made in writing.
The Complaints Resolution Panel (CRP) has received a complaint about an advertisement for Black Salve on
fairdinkumradio.com, the AVN "facebook invitation" and the AVN "twitter invitation" both linking to the Fairdinkum
Radio material on 5 May 2012.
You should respond to the complaint. If you do not provide a response, the Panel may determine the complaint
on the basis of the material before it.
We interpret the complaint as alleging breaches of sections 42C, 42DP and 42DM of the Act and sections 4(1)(b),
.1)(a), 4(2)(b), 4(2)(c), 4(2)(d), 4(2)(e), 4(7),5(2) and 6(3) of the Code. You should provide a response to eaCh
allegation.
Pursuant to regulation 42ZCAH, following a preliminary review of the complaint, please respond as well to each of
the following possible breaches of the Code and Act:
• Section 42Dl(1)(g) of the Act, because the advertisement promotes Black Salve for therapeutic use, when
these product/s may not be included in the Register
• Sections 4(1)(b), 4(2)(a), 4(2)(c) and 4(5) of the Code because of representations about the effects and
properties of Black Salve and comparisons with other goods and treatments
• Sections 4(2)(b) and 5 of the Code because of representations concerning serious or potentially serious
conditions and diseases
• Section 4(2)(d) of the Code because the material may abuse the trust or exploit the lack of knowledge of
consumers or contain language which could bring about fear or distress because of representations about
cancer treatments other than Black Salve, about medicines regulation and about the TGA
• Section 4(1)(b) and 4(2)(c) of the Code because of representations about cancer treatments other than Black
Salve, about medicines regulation and about the TGA
As well as responding to the particulars of the complaint as noted above, the Panel requests that you provide the
following:
,e Panel must consider a complaint and decide whether the complaint is justified having regard to written
submission and documents given to the Panel, the results of its inquiries and information obtained about the
After the parties have received a copy of the final written determination of the Panel concerning this complaint, that
determination will be made available to the public on request and will be included on the website
www.tgacrp.com.au under "Complaint Register". Before making the determination public in these ways, the identity
of the complainant will be omitted if the complainant has so requested. Also, any information accepted by the Panel
as confidential will be omitted.
The TGA observer to the Panel apPOinted by the TGA may be entitled to use any information provided to the Panel
(whether confidential or not) pursuant to section 61(8) of the Therapeutic Goods Act.
When the Panel considers the complaint, it may decide to raise other matters. If it does so, you will be notified in
writing and'asked to provide a further response.
101' the complaint is found to be justified, you may be asked to withdraw the advertisement, withdraw certain
. _,:)resentations and not use them in future advertisements, publish corrective information or publish
retraction/so Where the Panel req uests withdrawal of representations, the validity of the representations will not
generally be reconsidered (per Regulation 42ZCAI(1){d)) unless:
• at least 12 months have elapsed since the Panel made its request or
• genuinely new evidence has become available that was not available at the time of the complaint.
Your response must be provided to the Panel no.later than 16 July 2012. Should no response be received, the
Panel may, nevertheless, consider the complaint at its next meeting.
If you do not understand the complaint or are unsure as to how to respond, you may need to seek legal advice or
the advice of a regulatory consultant.
Attached for your information please find a copy of each of the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2007, the
Complaints Resolution Panel procedures and some relevant clauses from the therapeutic goods legislation. The
Code and procedures document also can be found on the website at www.tgacrp.com.au.
Erne!>( Waldstein
for Judith Brimer, Executive Officer
Complaints Resolution Panel
PO Box 764, North Sydney 2059
(02) 94602796
Fundamentals
Sydney Wed 24 October
Melbourne Thurs 22 November
Perth Fri 27 July
Adelaide Wed 25 July
Brisbane Fri 9 November
Advanced
Sydney Wed 19 September
Melbourne Fri 23 November
PRIVATE
Person's Personal Representative
For MERYL DOREY
Ernie Waldstein 12
In his Private capacity
Australia
16th July 2012
The Person's Personal Representative, after seeking wise council, writes to Ernie Waldstein, today in his
Private capacity and humbly and sincerely apologises for any dishonour he may have caused.
~'he Person's Person&! Representative, in his Inherent Jurisdiction de jure solum ei naturale, conditionally
a~cepts that Ernie Waldstein has made a well pled claim that, Meryl Dorey has advertised and promoted
'Black Salve' and that Leon Pittard has further promoted and advertised 'Black Salve' by publishing the
interview, and offers to settle this matter in private upon Ernie Waldstein in his own private capacity
providing true, correct and complete proof; that .
o The person making the claim has full knowledge of any fees paid fot any alleged advertising; and
that .
NOTICE
Ernie Waldstein, in his own private capacity, shall have twenty one days (21) from being served to
respond by rebutting all of the above - point for point - or it shall be declared that free speech is still an
inherent right, and the Person's Personal Representative has the proprietary right to settle all outstanding
issues in the private. .
Sincerely
M.D.
To: meryl@avn.org.au
13
Subject: Complaint 2012/05/013 Black Salve
Attachments: CRP 2012-05-013 Black Salve.pdf
Ms Meryl Dorey
Australian Vaccination Network Inc
PO Box 171
BANGALOW NSW 2479
30 January 2013
Dear Ms Dorey
Please find attached a copy of the determination reached by the Complaints Resolution Panel after its
consideration of the above complaint at the meeting of the Panel held on 20 September 2012.
Please note that sub-regulations 42ZCAI(3) and (4) ofthe Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 permit the
Panel to make recommendations to the Secretary ofthe Department of Health and Ageing in the event of non
compliance with this determination.
Where a retraction has been requested, please provide a copy of the proposed retraction for the Panel's
approval, before its publication or broadcast. Also subsequently provide a copy ofthe published or broadcast
retraction.
In practice, determinations that have not been complied with are referred to the Therapeutic Goods
Administration (TGA) for follow-up action. Referral to the TGA may result in an order being made under
Regulation 9 of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations to enforce compliance with the Panel's
determination. Non-compliance with this order could also result in suspension or cancellation of the product
~ntry from the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods.
Regulation 9 Orders issued by TGA for advertising complaint determinations finalised by the Panel after 1
November 2010 will be publicised on the TGA's website at http://www.tga.gov.au/advert/complaint
investigations.htm
Yours sincerely
Josie Barisic
on behalf of Judith Brimer, Executive Officer
Enrol at www.tgacc.com.au/events