GENESIS i podrijetlo nafte i ugljena Pregled

February 4, 2010 Veljaa 4, 2010 tags: APOLOGETICS , Bible Study , Christianity , coal , Dr. tags: Apologetika , Biblija studija , kranstvo , ugljen , dr. Gary S. Day , Genesis , global warming , oil Gary S. Dan , Genesis , globalno zatopljenje , naftne by christianconscience po christianconscience By Dr. Gary S. Day Dr. Gary S. Dan

http://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/oil-coal-copy.jpg http://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/oil-coal-copy.jpgTrevor Major is the author of this small booklet, copyrighted and published in 1990 and 1996 by Apologetics Press. When Major wrote this the US's energy consumption was heavily dependent upon petroleum, natural gas and coal. So he investigates the origins of these earth products, because of the danger of the supply being exhausted by over grazing, as it were. The economic reason for the high interest in the origins of these substances is the race for profits by the companies who spend billions in research and recovery of the product. Trevor Major je autor ove male knjiice, zatiene autorskim pravima i objavljeni u 1990 i 1996 od strane Apologetika Press. Kada Major napisao ovaj US potronja energije bila je jako ovisna o nafte, prirodnog plina i ugljena. Tako je on istrauje porijeklo te zemlje proizvoda, zbog opasnosti opskrbe se iscrpljena preko ispae, kao to su bili. gospodarskog razloga za visoke kamate na podrijetlo tih tvari je utrka za profit tvrtke koji troe milijarde na istraivanju i oporavku proizvoda .... There is a problem with origins though, for the Biblical account of Creation and the Flood is at odds with geologist's model of the formation of oil and coal. The geologists assume that these earth products took millions of years to form, from decayed organic life. The Bible would have the world to be very young, in the thousands of years, rather than in the millions of years. Arguments run in different directions in accounting for the age and deposits of these products, but Major posits that, any large-scale geological effects, such as deposits of coal and oil, would have to be explained by the Flood, and thinks that the deposits can be better explained by the Flood, rather than the standard geological model. Postoji problem s porijeklo ipak, za biblijski opis stvaranja, a poplava je u raskoraku s geolog model formiranja nafte i ugljena. Geolozi pretpostavljaju da su ti zemlja proizvodi su milijunima godina da se formira, od zaputeni organski ivot. Biblija bi svijet biti vrlo mlad, u tisuama godina, a ne u milijunima godina. Argumenti tranje u razliitim smjerovima u raunovodstvu za dob i depozite tih proizvoda, ali bojnik tvrdi da, "bilo velikih razmjera geoloki uinci, kao to su depoziti ugljena i nafte, bi se objasniti potop "i misli da moe bolje depozita objasniti Potopa, a" od standardnih geoloki model ". Although many would love to believe the Biblical Flood model for the creation of the deposits of oil and coal, but to do so they also would have to believe in the supernatural causation that the Bible portrays, because the Flood cannot be explained away by any natural process. The

resistance goes even deeper though. For if the Flood model works better in the petroleum history, cannot it do so for other geological histories? And if that is so, it would verify the Flood story and thus the Divine origins of the Bible. But the geological naturalists find it difficult to accept that God is involved in our affairs. Iako bi mnogi vole vjerovati model biblijski potop za stvaranje depozita nafte i ugljena, ali to uiniti tako da oni takoer e morati vjerovati u nadnaravno uzronosti da je Biblija prikazuje, jer je potop ne mogu objasniti daleko od bilo koje fizike proces. otpor ide jo dublje ipak. Jer, ako je potop model radi bolje u naftnoj povijesti, ne moe to uiniti za druge geoloke povijesti? A ako je tako, to bi provjeriti poplava priu i na taj nain Boansko porijeklo Biblije . No, geoloka prirodoslovci teko prihvatiti da Bog je ukljuen u nae stvari. Although many in the past saw God generally acting in natural events, two hundred years ago a man named James Hutton believed that the geological features we see on Earth today must be accounted for by the geological processes we see working today. From this thought came the notion that the laws of nature are uniform, now called uniformitarianism as popularized by Charles Lyell; therefore the rocks and deposits took million of years to develop. Iako su mnogi u prolosti vidio Boga openito djeluje u prirodnim zbivanjima, dvjesto godina ovjek po imenu James Hutton "Vjeruje se da geoloke znaajke vidimo na Zemlji danas moraju objasniti geolokim procesima vidimo radi i danas." Od ove misli doao pojam da zakoni prirode su jedinstvene, sada se zove uniformitarianism to je popularizirao Charles Lyell, stoga stijena i depoziti uzeo milijuna godina da se razvije. This takes God out of the picture, and represents the geologists who work under the assumptions of uniformitarianism. On the other hand, those who subscribe to the Genesis account of the Flood story and its interpretive framework for geology stand in opposition, and the gulf is wide. The author attempts to narrow the gap between the two geological views. To traje Bog iz slike, a predstavlja geolozi koji rade pod pretpostavke uniformitarianism. S druge strane, oni koji su se pretplatili na Postanka raun od poplava prie i interpretativnog okvira za geologiju stajati u opoziciji, a zaljev je irok. pokuava smanjiti jaz izmeu dvaju geolokih pogleda. Coal Formation Ugljen formacija Below is an image of the hypothetical evolution of peat moss in a Carboniferous swamp, turning into coal. Step one: slow decomposition of plant life accumulates, forming peat and then a soft brown coal called lignite. Step two: fragile plant tissue is destroyed while woody material is preserved, eventually forming a higher carbon content coal called bituminous coal with increased temperature and pressure. Step three: A thick layer of sediment reduces water content and gases while increasing pressure, causing chemical and physical transformation of peat into a hard black coal called anthracite. Ispod je slika hipotetski evolucije tresetnica u karbon movari, pretvara u ugljen Korak jedan:. Sporo razgradnja biljnog ivota akumulira, formiranje treset i onda soft mrki ugljen lignit zove Korak dva:. Krhak biljnog tkiva je unitena, dok drvenastog materijala je ouvan, s vremenom formiraju vei sadraj ugljika ugljena zove bitumenski ugljen s povienom temperaturom i tlakom Korak tri:. debeli sloj taloga smanjuje sadraj vode i plinova, a poveanjem tlaka, to uzrokuje kemijske i fizikalne transformacije treseta u tvrdu crnu ugljena zove antracit.

http://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/coal-strata-1.jpg http://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/coal-strata-1.jpg There are several types or ranks of coal, as mentioned above, lignite, bituminous, and anthracite coals; which rank they are depends more on the depth of where they are found, and thus are not a good indicator of their age. Postoji nekoliko tipova ili redovima ugljena, kao to je spomenuto gore, lignit, bitumenski, antracit i ar, koji rank su vie ovisi o dubini, gdje se nalaze, i na taj nain nisu dobar pokazatelj njihove dobi. Five evidences that challenge the uniformitarian model of coal formation, yet provide evidence for the Flood model are as follows: Pet dokazi koji dovode u pitanje uniformitarian model formiranja ugljena, ali pruiti dokaz za potop modela su kako slijedi: 1) There is no gradation from one coal rank to the other; 1) Ne postoji gradacija od jednog ugljena in na druge; 2) The excessive amount of coal the extent of the deposits; 2) pretjeranu koliinu ugljena opsegu depozita; 3) The types of plants and fossils associated with many coal deposits; 3) vrste biljaka i fosila povezana s mnogim leita ugljena; 4) Evidence suggests a speedy and recent development of coal in nature; and 4) Dokazi sugeriraju brzo i nedavni razvoj uglja u prirodi i 5) The evidence of speedy and recent formation of coal in the laboratory. 5) dokaz o brzom i nedavni nastanak ugljena u laboratoriju. The Van Krevelen diagram below shows the main groups of organic matter plotted as a ratio of hydrogen-to-carbon verses oxygen-to-carbon. Lignin is the durable substance of woody plants which produce vitrinite, the main component in most coals. The increased levels of heat and pressure change the properties of lignin, which in turn produces the different ranks of coals shown. The increase of rank from lignite to anthracite represents a rise in carbon content relative to hydrogen and oxygen. Dijagram ispod pokazuje Van Krevelen "glavne skupine organskih tvari ucrtava se kao omjer vodik-ugljik stihovi kisik-ugljik". Lignina je izdrljiv tvar od drvenastih biljaka koje proizvode vitrinite, glavni sastojak u veini ugljevlje. Poviene razine topline i tlaka promijeniti svojstva lignina, to zauzvrat proizvodi razliitih redova ugljevlje prikazane. porast ranga iz lignita u antracit "predstavlja porast u odnosu na sadraj ugljika vodika i kisika."

http://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/lipinite_vitrinite_inertinite-2.jpg

http://narrowgatejournal.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/lipinite_vitrinite_inertinite-2.jpg 1) Gradation 1) gradacije Although regional tectonic activity may invert the ranks of coal, no swamp can be found where peat is changing into coal. In the Waikato Valley of New Zealand, peat swamps lie over rocks containing sub-bituminous coal seams, but there is no subtle gradation between the two. This reminds me of the multiple missing links problem in evolutionary theory. There just isn't any supportive evidence. Iako su regionalne tektonske aktivnosti moe izokrenuti redovima ugljena, ne movara mogu nai gdje treset se mijenja u ugljen. "U dolini Waikato Novog Zelanda, treset movare lee preko stijene sadre pod-bitumenski ugljen avova, ali nema suptilne nijanse izmeu ta dva. "Ovo me podsjea vie" nedostaje veza "problem u teoriji evolucije. Postoji samo nije bilo koji podravaju dokaza. Although there are some limited variations, Coal deposits appear in geological strata already formed, and do not show evidence of the presumed evolutionary pathway leading from a peat swamp. Iako postoje neke ograniene varijacije ", leita ugljena pojavljuju u geolokim slojevima ve formirana, a ne pokazuju dokaze pretpostavljene evolucijske put vodi iz treseta movare". 2) Quantity 2) Koliina The problem of the quantity of coal deposits can be seen graphically: Problem koliine uglja moe vidjeti grafiki: 1 ft of coal = 12 ft of peat 1 ft ugljena = 12 m od treseta 1 ft of peat = 10 ft of plant matter 1 ft treseta = 10 m od biljnih tvari SO SO 1 ft of coal = 120 ft of plant matter 1 ft ugljena = 120 m od biljnih tvari Some would permit 1 ft of coal = 5 ft of peat. Neki bi dopustio 1 ft ugljena = 5 m od treseta. Nevertheless, a 10 ft coal seam would require 500-1,200 ft of plant matter. A 200 ft coal seam would requirewell you get the point. As WG Woolnough said, Again, nowhere in the world, at present, can accumulations of vegetable matter be found which are quantitatively commensurate with any of the major coal deposits of past geological time, (Sedimentation in Barred Basins and Source Rock Oil,: Origin of Evaporites, Tulsa, 1971). On the other hand a world wide flood would have ripped up large quantities of plant life and covered them with huge quantities of sediments which would provide the pressure needed. Ipak, 10 m av ugljen e

zahtijevati 500-1,200 ft biljnih tvari. 200 ft kop e zahtijevati ... dobro ste dobili toku. Kao WG Woolnough rekao: "Opet, nigdje u svijetu, u sadanjosti, moe akumulacije biljnih tvari koje se mogu nai kvantitativno razmjerni s bilo koje od glavnih uglja prolih geolokih vremena "(Sedimentacija u Prugaste koljke Izvor Rock Oil,: Podrijetlo Evaporiti, Tulsa, 1971). S druge strane svjetski potop imati ripped up velike koliine biljnog svijeta te ih prekrivene ogromnim koliinama sedimenata koji e osigurati potreban tlak. 3) Composition 3) Sastav The problem here is that the uniformitarian view requires most coal to be formed from peat collecting in a swamp, but most coal forming plants require dry land, not wet. Problem ovdje je da uniformitarian pogled zahtijeva najvie ugljen da se formira od treseta prikupljanja u movari, ali veina ugljena formiranje biljke zahtijevaju kopno, a ne mokra. 4) Rapid Formation in Nature 4) Rapid formacije u prirodi Several clues indicate that coal didn't take millions of years to form: Nekoliko naznake upuuju na to da ugljen nije uzeo milijune godina u obliku: 1) Vertical tree trunks within coal deposits indicate quick burial; 1) Vertikalni debla unutar leita ugljena upuuju na brzi ukopa; 2) Gentry's work (Radiohalos in Coalfield Wood, Science, 194, 315-318, 1976) on coalfield wood from uranium-rich rocks containing radiohalos, some which are apparently too young to support the uniformitarianism position. 2) Gentry je rad ("Radiohalos u Coalfield Wood, nauke, 194, 315-318, 1976) na coalfield drvo od urana bogatih stijena sadri radiohalos, neki koji su oito premladi za podrku uniformitarianism poziciju. Without going into detail in this review, Gentry, summarizes his findings this way, This is exactly what would be expected on the basis of a near simultaneous deposition of all the wood at the time of the flood (Creation's Tiny Mystery, 1986). Bez ulaenja u pojedinosti u ovom pregledu, Gentry, rezimira njegov nalaz na ovaj nain: "To je upravo ono to bi se oekivalo na temelju blizini istovremenog taloenja svih drva u vrijeme poplava" (Stvaranje's Tiny Mystery, 1986) . 5) Rapid Formation in the Laboratory 5) Rapid formacije u Laboratoriju Tests which comes close to simulating nature, conducted at various labs, including the Argonne National Laboratory, has shown that subjecting lignin to a heat of 150C in the presence of clay over a period ranging from two to eight months in the absence of oxygen, produces a chemical composition resembling bituminous coals in eight months, and lignite in two months. The reason clay is important is that it is often associated with coal seams, and lignin is the primary component of coal. Also, a temperature of 150C corresponds to a depth of burial [12,00820,506 ft] we might expect for bituminous coals. Testovi koji dolazi blizu simulira prirodu, provedena na razliitim laboratorijima, ukljuujui i Argonne National Laboratory, pokazala je da podvrgavanju "lignina na toplinu od 150 C u prisutnosti gline tijekom perioda od dva do osam mjeseci u odsutnosti kisika, "proizvodi kemijski sastav nalik bitumenskih ugljevlje u osam mjeseci, i lignit u dva mjeseca. razloga gline je vano je da je esto povezana s ugljena avova, i lignina je primarna komponenta ugljena. Takoer," temperatura 150 C odgovara dubine ukopa [12,008-20,506 m] moemo oekivati za bitumenske ugljevlje. " A Flood Model Model poplava In 1979 Austin found that (for the reasons mentioned above) many coal deposits did not form from the gradual accumulation of peat in freshwater swamps, and suggests another model: a raft of plant debris floating on top of a sea or lake could sink, be buried, and then be transformed into coal. This might explain how marine fossils found their way into sediments in coal, and explain the size and composition of coal deposits. Major, believes that this log raft model is consistent with a catastrophic flood. The explosion of Mt St. Helens may support this finding,

for Many logs with an attached root system were found floating [in Spirit Lake, which also had a dense log matt over much of its surface], in an upright position, and an estimated 15,000 logs were partially buried in the lake sediments. So, it is possible for a catastrophic event to place upright trees inside of coal seams. This scene also resembles certain coal beds in Eastern United States. Austin states, All that is needed is burial and slight heating to transform the Spirit Lake peat into coal (Mt. St. Helens and Catastrophism, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Aug 4-9, 1986). Modern analogy from Spirit Lake, Austin's log raft model and evidence from many existing coal deposits provide a way to explain the existence of coal in terms of the Genesis Flood. Godine 1979 Austin utvrdio da (iz razloga gore navedenih) "mnogi uglja nije oblik od postupnog nakupljanja treseta u slatkovodne movare", te predlae drugi model: "splav biljnih ostataka plutajui na vrhu more ili jezero mogao sudoper, biti pokopan, a onda se pretvara u ugljen. "Ovo bi moglo objasniti kako se morski fosili se mogu pronai svoj put u naslagama ugljena, i" objasniti veliinu i sastav leita ugljena. "Major, vjeruje da je ovaj" dnevnik splav "model je u skladu s katastrofalnim poplavama. "Eksplozija Mt St. Helens moe podrati ovaj nalaz, za" Mnogi zapisnicima sa priloenom korijenski sustav je pronaena mrtva [u Duhu Lake, koja je takoer imala gustu prijavite mat tijekom veeg dijela njegove povrine] u uspravnom poloaju, a procjenjuje se 15.000 trupci djelomino bile zakopane u jezerskim sedimentima. Dakle, mogue je za katastrofalan dogaaj na mjesto uspravno drvee unutar ugljena avova. Ova scena takoer podsjea odreene ugljena leaja u istonoj Sjedinjene Amerike Drave. Austin drave "Sve to je potrebno je pogreb i lagano zagrijavanje za pretvaranje jezera treset Duh u ugljen" (Mt. St. Helens i katastrofizam ", Zbornik radova Prve meunarodne konferencije o kreacionizma, 4-9 kolovoz, 1986). Moderni analogno Duha iz jezera, Austin je "dnevnik splav" model i dokaza iz mnogih postojeih leita ugljena pruaju nain da se objasni postojanje ugljena u smislu Postanka Potopa. Oil and Natural Gas Origin Nafte i prirodnog plina podrijetlu Most petroleum geologist vote that oil derives from living organisms, while others, including astrophysicist Thomas Gold, believe that oil has a non-biological origin and is formed by methane, but so far his research has been fruitless. The difficulty in ascertaining oil's origin is the variation of its chemistry and the differing geological locations where it is found, but the one thing it has in common is that it is always found in or near sedimentary rocks of marine origin (Brownlow, 1979). And as is similar to the formation of coal, dead plants and animals, heat and pressure and chemical reaction, plus thousands of feet of sediment are combined to make crude oil. With more burial depth and heat, methane and light hydrocarbons were developed, which is known as natural gas. Veina naftni geolog glasovati da nafta potjee iz ivih organizama, dok su drugi, ukljuujui astrofiziar Thomas Gold, vjerujem da ulje ima ne-biolokog porijekla te je formirana metan, ali do sada je njegovo istraivanje je besplodna. Potekoa u utvrivanju ulje's podrijetla varijacija svojih kemije i razliite geoloke mjesta gdje je pronaen, ali jedna stvar je zajednika je da je "uvijek nalazio u blizini ili sedimentnim stijenama morskog podrijetla" (Brownlow, 1979). I kao to je slian formiranje ugljena, mrtve biljke i ivotinje, topline i tlaka i kemijske reakcije, plus tisue metara sedimenta se kombiniraju da bi sirova nafta. s vie ukopa dubine i topline, metana i lagani ugljikovodici su razvijene, koji je poznat kao prirodni plin . Two more bits of information are needed to explain the huge oil fields. Both oil and gas must migrate out of the original source rock into a reservoir rock, which will hold the oil in its pores and crevices, much like the conditions of an aquifer. Then impervious rock or some other barrier is needed to stop oil from leaking to the surface and keep it under pressure. In the uniformitarian perspective, this takes millions of years to occur, in several steps. Dva vie bitova informacija su potrebne objasniti ogroman naftnih polja. Oba nafte i plina "mora seliti iz

originalnog izvora stijena u rezervoar stijena, koja e se odrati nafte u pore i pukotine", ba kao i uvjete vodonosnik. Tada neprohodan rock ili neke druge barijere je potrebno da se "zaustavi ulje od curenja na povrini i drati ga pod pritiskom." U uniformitarian perspektive, to traje milijunima godina da se dogodi, u nekoliko koraka. There are some creation scientists, like Morton, who follow the inorganic origin of oil, but most share the belief that oil was formed by the sudden and catastrophic Biblical Flood, that buried the plant and animal life. One piece of evidence that may support the Flood model is that both red blood cells and plant life alike contain chemicals (heme and chlorophyll respectively) that form into porphyrin, a common ingredient of sedimentary rocks and crude oil. A catastrophic worldwide Flood would also cut off porphyrin from oxidizing agents, which destroy them. Postoje neke stvaranje znanstvenici, poput Morton, koji slijede anorganskog podrijetla ulja, ali veina dijele uvjerenje da je ulje je formiran naglog i katastrofalnog biblijska poplava, koje pokopan biljnog i ivotinjskog svijeta. Jedan komad dokaza da moe podravati poplava modela je da obe crvenih krvnih stanica i biljnog ivota podjednako sadre kemikalije (hema i klorofila respektivno) koje formiraju u porfirin ", zajedniki sastojak sedimentnih stijena i sirove nafte." katastrofalnih poplava u svijetu takoer e odsjeeni od porfirin oksidacijskim sredstvima, to ih je unititi. Experiments has shown that porphyrins can be produced from chlorophyll in a matter of hours, showing the longevity of time needed by the uniformitarian model to be unnecessary. Eksperimenti pokazuju da je "porfirina se moe proizvesti iz klorofila u nekoliko sati", pokazuje dugovjenost vrijeme potrebno za uniformitarian model biti nepotrebna. 4) Rapid Formation in Nature 4) Rapid formacije u prirodi In 1989, Didyk and Simoneit wrote about the Guaymas Basin 6,500 foot trench in the Gulf of California which is covered by a 1,500 foot-thick blanket of olive green ooze. The hot geothermal waters that are percolating through the ooze, is producing oil and natural gas. And the oil is only 5,000 years old, according to radiocarbon dating. This finding cannot be ingested at face value, but it does put into deep relief the millions of years that are needed for the uniformitarian view. Other studies suggest that the Flood involves the rapid addition of new, hot ocean crust, which could compel the change of organic material into hydrocarbons. Although some would negate the findings because of some chemical differences of the crude oil in the Guaymas Basin from other crude oil finds, this may be explained from the fact that the oil in the Basin is developed from basically one source of plant life, plankton and algae, while crude elsewhere is found to have multiples sources. Godine 1989, Didyk i Simoneit pisao o Guaymas Basin "6.500 noga rov u Gulf of California to je obuhvaeno 1.500 noga-debeli pokriva maslinasto zelenu mulj." Vrue geotermalne vode koje se gube kroz mulj, je proizvodnju ulja i prirodnog plina. A ulje je samo 5.000 godina, prema datiranje radioaktivnim ugljikom. Ovaj nalaz se ne moe gutati po nominalnoj vrijednosti, ali on ne stavi u duboki reljef milijuna godina koje su potrebne za uniformitarian pogled. Druge studije sugeriraju da je "poplava ukljuuje brzo dodavanje novih, vrue oceana kora", to bi moglo natjerati na promjenu organskog materijala u ugljikovodika. Iako neki bi ponitila nalaza zbog neke kemijske razlike sirove nafte u Guaymas bazenu s drugih sirove nafte nalazi , To se moe objasniti iz injenice da je ulje u bazenu u osnovi se razvija iz jednog izvora biljnog ivota, planktona i alge, a sirova drugdje se utvrdi da su viekratnici izvora. 5) Rapid Formation in the Laboratory 5) Rapid formacije u Laboratoriju Laboratory oil making is done to investigate the origin of oil, and the feasibility of making synthetic oil. However laboratory and natural setting differences bring this method into question. But researchers Saxby and Riley (1984) put oil shale and brown coals into six stainless steel pressure cooker devices; and beginning at 100C raised the heat one degree per week over a 300

week period, analyzing the product at every fifty weeks (and thus every fifty degrees increase). What was found was that after 200 weeks (four years) the production of a substance 'indistinguishable from a paraffinic crude oil,' while the brown coal produced 'wet natural gas'. Yet despite the limitations of this and other successful experiments, it is clear that oil can form within a relatively short period of time. The Flood model, though in early stages, shows much hope in finding the solution of these earth products' origin. Laboratorij ulje to je uinjeno da se ispita porijeklo nafte, i izvedivosti izrade sintetikih ulja. No laboratorij i prirodnom ambijentu razlike donijeti ovaj nain dovedena u pitanje. No, znanstvenici Saxby i Riley (1984) staviti ulje i smei ugljeni kriljaca u "est od nehrajueg elika lonac na pritisak ureaja; ", s poetkom u 100 C podie toplinu jednog stupnja tjedno preko 300 tjedan razdoblje, analiziranje proizvoda na svakih pedeset tjedna (i tako svakih pedeset stupnjeva poveanja) Ono to je pronaao je da je nakon 200 tjedna (. etiri godine) proizvodnja "tvari" ne razlikuje od parafinske sirove nafte ", dok je smeeg ugljena proizvedenog mokri prirodnog plina '." Meutim, unato ogranienjima ovog i drugih uspjenih eksperimenata ", jasno je da ulje moe obliku u roku od relativno kratkom vremenskom razdoblju. "poplava model, iako u ranim fazama, pokazuje mnogo nade u pronalaenju rjeenja za ove zemlje proizvoda podrijetlom. Some scientists capitulate to naturalism and abandon a conservative of Scripture, while others fail to consider the proper relationship of science and Divine Revelation by invoking that geological things look old because God made them that way. Though God created life in a mature state Gen 1:12, 22, 28 and 'He could have' just created these earth products, this last assumption denies that coal and oil deposits offer remarkable evidence for His watery judgment of sinful man (Genesis 6:5-7) as has been seen above. Neki znanstvenici kapitulirati u naturalizam i napustiti konzervativnu Pisma, dok drugi "ne uzeti u obzir pravilan odnos znanosti i boanske Objave" pozivajui se da je geoloki stvari izgledaju stare, jer ih je Bog napravio na taj nain. Iako je Bog stvorio ivot u zrelim stanju generala 1:12, 22, 28 i 'On je mogao imati' upravo stvorili ove zemlje proizvode, ovaj posljednji pretpostavke negira da je "ugljena i nafte nude izvanredne dokaze za njegovu vodeni presuda od grenog ovjeka (Postanak 6:5-7)" kao to je se vidi gore. What had developed in the naturalist camp since the writing of this book is the theory that the earth itself naturally produces oil without the need for a biological base in its formation, thus there is an endless supply. to je razvio u prirodoslovac logoru od pisanja ove knjige je teorija da je zemlja sama prirodno proizvodi ulje bez potrebe za bioloku bazu u njegovom formiranju, pa se beskrajne ponude. This position too excludes God, and is the way for carnal man regardless of the evidence that if put before them (Romans 1). Ovaj poloaj takoer iskljuuje Boga, a je put za tjelesni ovjek bez obzira na dokaze da ako se stavi pred njima (Rimljanima 1).