Você está na página 1de 2

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE SYLLABUS Ateneo de Manila University Prof. Tranquil S. Salvador III Part I A.

Venue in Criminal Cases is Jurisdictional 1. 2. 3. 4. B. Isip v. People, G.R. No.. 170298, June 26, 2007 Landbank of the Philippines v. Belisata, G.R. No. 170298, June 26, 2007 People v. Taroy, G.R. No. 192466, September 07, 2011 Bonifacio v. RTC of Makati, G.R. No. 184800, May 05, 2010

Jurisdiction to Issue Hold Departure Orders (Regular Courts Distinguished with the Sandiganbayan) 1. 2. Mondejar v. Buban, A.M. No. MTJ-01-1349, July 12, 2001 Mupas v. Espanol, A.M. No. RTJ-04-1850, July 14, 2004

C.

Jurisdiction determined by the allegations of the Complaint 1. Foz v. People, October 9, 2009, G.R. No. 167764

D.

Creation of the Sandiganbayan Section 4, Article XI of the 1987 Constitution Presidential Decree 1486 dated June 11, 1978 Presidential Decree 1606 dated December 10, 1978 Presidential Decree 1861 Republic Act 7995 approved March 10, 1995 Republic Act 8249 approved February 5, 1997

E.

Jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan 1. 2. 3. People v. Sandiganbayan, August 25, 2009, G.R. No. 167304 Serrana v. Sandiganbayan, January 22, 2008, G.R. 162059 Esquivel v. Ombudsman, September 17, 2002, G.R. 137237

F.

Dismissal of the Complaint because of inordinate delay 1. 2. Tatad v. Sandiganbayan, 159 SCRA 70 Cervantes v. Sandiganbayan, 307 SCRA 149

G.

Anti-Graft Cases in the Sandiganbayan 1. 2. 3. 4. Venus v. Desierto, 298 SCRA 219 Fonacier v. Sandiganbayan, 238 SCRA 687 Magcusi v. Sandiganbayan, 240 SCRA 13 Sistoza v. Desierto , G.R. No. 144784, September 3, 2002

H.

Jurisdiction of the Ombudsman 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Department of Justice v. Liwag, February 11, 2005, G.R. No. 149311 Lazatin v. Desierto, June 5, 2009, G.R. No. 147097 Presidential Ad-Hoc Fact Finding Committee v. Desierto, July 24, 2007 Castro v. Deloria, January 27, 2009, G.R. No. 163586 Angeles v. Merceditas Gutierrez, G.R. Nos. 189161 & 189173, March 21, 2012

I.

Review of Decisions of the Ombudsman 1. 2. 3. Antonino v. Desierto, December 18, 2008, G.R. No. 144492 Enemecio v. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 146731, January 13, 2004 Baviera v. Zoleta, G.R. NO. 169098, October 12, 2006

J.

Procedure before the Ombudsman 1. 2. Sesbreno v. Aglugub, February 28, 2005, A.M. No. MTJ 05-1581 Enriquez v. Caminade, A.M. NO. RTJ-05-1966, March 21, 2006

I.

Power of the Secretary of Justice over Prosecutors 1. 2. Punzalan v. de la Pena, July 21, 2004, G.R. No. 158543 Dino et al. v. Olivarez, G.R. No. 170447, December 04, 2009

J.

Role of the Office of the Solicitor General in Criminal Cases 1. People v. Duca, October 9, 2009, G.R. No. 171175

Você também pode gostar