This paper compares the performance of franchised and company owned fast food outlets. Results support the view that incentives provided in the franchise contract are likely to lead to better and more consistent outlet performance. However, there are a few chains where company owned stores get higher scores than theirfranchised counterparts.
This paper compares the performance of franchised and company owned fast food outlets. Results support the view that incentives provided in the franchise contract are likely to lead to better and more consistent outlet performance. However, there are a few chains where company owned stores get higher scores than theirfranchised counterparts.
Direitos autorais:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formatos disponíveis
Baixe no formato DOC, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
This paper compares the performance of franchised and company owned fast food outlets. Results support the view that incentives provided in the franchise contract are likely to lead to better and more consistent outlet performance. However, there are a few chains where company owned stores get higher scores than theirfranchised counterparts.
Direitos autorais:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formatos disponíveis
Baixe no formato DOC, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
(6) College of Business, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, USA Abstract The paper compares the performance of franchised and company owned fast food outlets located within the same region in the USA. These outlets are inspected by the same team of health inspectors who use a standardized 44 item scale derived from Federal Drug Administration guidelines. Analysis of the health inspection scores received by the fast food outlets over approximately two and a half years shows that franchised stores receive significantly better ratings. The inspection scores of franchised outlets also have a lower standard deviation than that of company owned stores. The results support the view that the incentives provided in the franchise contract as well as the additional layer of supervision by the franchisee are likely to lead to better and more consistent outlet performance. At the same time, there are a few chains where company owned stores get higher scores than theirfranchised counterparts. This suggests that there are inter chain differences in the operational efficiencies of the two organizational formats.
by Vance H. Fried , B. Elango
In the last 20 years, a significant amount of research on franchising has been conducted in various disciplines, including economics, law, management, marketing, and management science. A major goal of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing literature. A second goal of this article is to enumerate steps that can be taken to improve both the rigor and relevance of franchising research. Since this represents an initial overview of a very broad research field, we have not attempted to develop a tightly focused research agenda on any one topic. Instead we present several relatively general, widely applicable suggestions that can significantly improve future research. We first split existing research into three categories and provide reasons for this split. Each of the categories is then reviewed, and suggestions are offered to improve research. Finally, methodologies for franchising research are discussed. Franchising sales of goods and services in the U.S. are estimated at $758 billion (U.S. Department of Census 1994), with further expansion expected (Hoffman and Preble 1991). There are 2,177 franchisors with 542,000 units (U.S. Department of Census 1994); 374 U.S. franchisors operate about 35,000 franchised units abroad, 75 percent of which are in Canada, Japan, Western Europe, and Australia (U.S. Department of Commerce 1988; U.S. Department of Census 1994). Franchising is an important means of doing business for many entrepreneurs. It is suited for environments characterized by intense competition, rapidly changing customer tastes, and a trend towards localized market segments.