Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Outcome of 5-Year Joint Study of Keio University/Tsinghua University Sponsored by NEDO (New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization) Japan
Keio University/Tsingua University 1
Tsinghua University
Lu Yingyun,
Liu Deshun, Ma Yuqing, Zhao Yong, Zhou Sheng, Tong Qing, Professor, 3E Research Institute Professor, Institute of Nuclear Energy Technology Professor, 3E Research Institute Associate Professor, 3E Research Institute Lecturer, 3E Research Institute Assistant Professor, 3E Research Institute
Members of the 3E CDM Committee in Japan Various staffs in Electric Power Companies in China
Keio University/Tsingua University 2
Reason
Major CO2 emitters
Process of analysis
Study and select CDM model plant and technology Calculate Baseline emissions (existing emissions) Estimate CO2 2 reduction of model plant Estimate CO2 2 reduction potential in China Calculate CO2 2 reduction costs Estimate CO2 2 reduction potential in China corresponding to various cost
Keio University/Tsingua University 6
The above 3 groups account for 75% of total capacity in North China
Selection of model units/technologies, collection of detailed data, thereafter implementation of site survey Price of fuel (gas price is about 8 times higher than coal
Keio University/Tsingua University 7
Estimate CO2 emission reductions of model units by applying state-of-the-art Japanese technologies (with some exception) Apply model units reduction to all others units
Keio University/Tsingua University 8
100MW
Retrofit
200MW
Retrofit
300MW
Fuel switching from coal to natural gas
Total
11,695
7,180
9,004
45,550
73,429
Targeted plants Plant capacity bigger than 1 Mt of Pig Iron, but excludes plants already installed them
Top Pressure Blast furnaces exceeding 1000 Recovery Turbine M3, but excludes plants already installed them (TRT)
Keio University/Tsingua University 10
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
total 73429
Power Plant Steel Industry Paper Industry Cement Industry Oil Refinery and Chemical Industry
5744
783
13275
8625
Paper industry Reduction potential is 3941172 thousand ton-CO2. 783 thousand ton-CO2 showed above is average. Keio University/Tsingua University 12
300MW Fuel switching CDQ Steel Industry TRT Paper Industry Replace of small vertical kiln
Cement Industry
Replace of wet-process kiln with SP Waste heat power generation Utilize of combustible waste as fuel Utilize of steel slag for cement material Residue gasification at oil refineries
Utilize of exhaust gas at ethylene plants IGCC at chemical fertilizer plants Ion-exchange membrane process at soda plants
13
i =1 n
(1 + r )
i =1
(1 + r )
I0
(Baseline emission)
( ECi EBi ) + I0 i (1 + r ) i =1
n
i =1
( EC i EB i ) + I0 i (1 + r )
Y
i =1
(Carbon reduction cost per ton) SBi: revenue, EBi: fuel cost, MBi: maintenance cost of Baseline case SCi: revenue, ECi: fuel cost , MCi: maintenance cost of CDM case I0: initial investment cost of the project
Keio University/Tsingua University 14
Reduction Potential
1,000t- CO2/y
100 MW
Retrofit
200 MW
Modification
300 MW
Fuel switching
Total
15
1.6 0.5
-15.3 -15.6
16
Reduction Potential
1,000t- CO2/y
394 - 1,172
21.1
0.91
17
Reduction Potential
1,000t- CO2/y
Cost,$/t - CO2
7 year crediting period
Cost,
$/t - CO2
6,707 938
-20.4 -19.8
-23.3 -33.5
729 251
-4.7 24.7
-5.8 7.5
19
CO2 Emission Reduction Potential (million ton-CO2 /year crediting period: 7years crediting period: 14years
20
5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000
50MW Scrap & Build 100MW Modification Power 200MW Modification Plant 300MW Fuel switching CDQ Steel Industry TRT Paper Industry Replace of small vertical kiln Replace of wet-process kiln with SP Cement Waste heat power generation Industry Utilize of combustible waste as fuel Utilize of steel slag for cement material Residue gasification at oil refineries Oil Refinery Utilize of exhaust gas at ethylene plants and IGCC at chemical fertilizer plants Chemical Ion-exchange membrane process at soda plants Industr
11695 8.3 7180 19.4 9004 28.3 45550 4764 1.6 980 0.5 783 21.1 4807 45.0 357 55.9 1892 8.9 4260 25.0 1959 -2.9 6707 -20.4 938 -19.8 729 -4.7 251 24.7 $0 $4.5 $9 $18 All Potential
61.4
21
Tentative Conclusion
Potential CO2 emission reduction in five major sectors is around 100 Mt (Physical potential) Among them, power generation sector is the largest (especially at 300 MW units) When considering cost, picture changes drastically Very few commercially viable projects exist (at zero cost, total reduction will be only 10 Mt, at $4.5, still 16 Mt even under our baseline emission figures) Fuel switching projects in power sector will not be feasible due to high cost of natural gas Public funding is essential for promotion of CDM projects in China
Keio University/Tsingua University 22
Further works
Elaborate baseline emissions in view of discussions at the Executive Board Revisiting selection of model plants Improve data quality (other than power plants) Compare with other top down models Take into consideration of transaction costs Explore applicability of our methodology to other developing countries
Keio University/Tsingua University 23