Statutory Construction Reviewer Based on Ruben F.

Agpalos Statutory Construction

Statutory Construction Reviewer

Based on the book, Statutory Construction by Ruben E. Agpalo

The reason why a particular statute was enacted by the legislature.

Legislative Meaning Construction

The art or process of discovering and expounding the meaning and intention of the authors of law, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its language or the fact that the given case is not explicitly provided for in the law. Purpose: to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the law, to determine legislative intent.

What the law, by its language, means: what it comprehends, what it covers or embraces, what it limits or confines.

In construing a statute, it is not enough to ascertain the intention or meaning of the statute; it is also necessary to see whether the intention or meaning has been expressed in such a way as to give it legal effect and validity.

Rules of Statutory Construction

These are tools used to ascertain legislative intent. They are not rules but mere axioms of experience.

Legislative Intent

The essence of the law. The intent of the legislature is the law, and the key to, and the controlling factor in, its construction and interpretation. The primary source of legislative intent is the statute itself.

The duty and power to interpret or construe a statute or the Constitution belongs to the judiciary. The SC construes the applicable law in controversies which are ripe for judicial resolution. The court does not interpret law in a vacuum. The legislature has no power to overrule the interpretation or construction of a statute or the Constitution by the Supreme Court, for interpretation is a judicial function assigned to the latter by the fundamental law. The SC may, in an appropriate case, change or overrule its previous construction.

Where the words or phrases of a statute are not obscure or ambiguous, its meaning and the intention of the legislature must be determined from the language employed.

A condition sine qua non before the court may construe or interpret a statute, is that there be doubt or ambiguity in its language. The province of construction lies wholly within the domain of ambiguity. Where there is no ambiguity in the words of a statute, there is no room for construction.

Legislative Purpose

A statute is ambiguous when it is capable of being understood by reasonably well-informed persons in either of two senses.
1|Page

Statutory Construction Reviewer Based on Ruben F. Agpalos Statutory Construction

Where the law is free from ambiguity, the court may not introduce exceptions or conditions where none is provided. A meaning that does not appear nor is intended or reflected in the very language of the statute cannot be placed therein be construction. Where the two statutes that apply to a particular case, that which was specifically designed for the said case must prevail over the other. When the SC has laid down a principle of law as applicable to a certain state of facts, it will adhere to that principle and apply it to all future cases where the facts are substantially the same. Judicial rulings have no retroactive effect. The court may issue guidelines in applying the statute, not to enlarge or restrict it but to clearly delineate what the law requires. This is not judicial legislation but an act to define what the law is.

When the text of the statute is clear and free form doubt, it is improper to resort to its title to make it obscure.

2. Preamble

That part of the statute written immediately after its title, which states the purpose, reason or justification for the enactment of a law. It is usually expressed in the form of whereas clauses. It is not an essential part of the statute. But it may, when the statute is ambiguous, be resorted to clarify the ambiguity, as a key to open the minds of the lawmakers as to the purpose of the statute.

3. Context of the whole text

Limitations on power to construe

Courts may not enlarge nor restrict statutes. Courts may not be influenced by questions of wisdom.

The best source from which to ascertain the legislative intent is the statute itself the words, the phrases, the sentences, sections, clauses, provisions taken as a whole and in relation to one another.

4. Punctuation marks AIDS TO CONSTRUCTION To ascertain the true intent of the statute, the court may avail of intrinsic aids, or those found in the printed page of the statute, and extrinsic aids, those extraneous facts and circumstances outside the printed page. 1. Title

Punctuation marks are aids of low degree; they are not parts of the statute nor the English language. Where there is, however, an ambiguity in a statute which may be partially or wholly solved by a punctuation mark, it may be considered in the construction of a statute.

5. Capitalization of letters

The title may indicate the legislative extent or restrict the scope of the law, and a statute couched in a language of doubtful import will be construed to conform to the legislative intent as disclosed in its title.

An aid of low degree in the construction of statutes.

6. Headnotes or epigraphs
2|Page

Statutory Construction Reviewer Based on Ruben F. Agpalos Statutory Construction

These are convenient index to the contents of the provisions of a statute; they may be consulted in case of doubt in interpretation. They are not entitled to much weight.

While definitions given by lexicographers are not binding, courts have adopted, in proper cases, such definitions to support their conclusion as to the meaning of the particular words used in a statute.

7. Lingual text

5. Consequences of various constructions

Unless otherwise provided, where a statute is officially promulgated in English and Spanish, the English text shall govern, but in case of ambiguity, omission or mistake, the Spanish may be consulted to explain the English text. The language in which a statute is written prevails over its translation.

Construction of a statute should be rejected if it will cause injustice, result in absurdity or defeat the legislative intent.

6. Presumptions

1. Intent or spirit of law

Based on logic, common sense; eg. Presumption of constitutionality, completeness, prospective application, right and justice, etc.

Legislative intent or spirit is the controlling factor, the influence most dominant if a statute needs construction. The intent of the law is that which is expressed in the words thereof, discovered in the four corners of the law and aided if necessary by its legislative history.

================================================== LEGISLATIVE HISTORY Where a statute is susceptible of several interpretations, there is no better means of ascertaining the will and intention of the legislature than that which is afforded by the history of the statute. The history of a statute refers to all its antecedents from its inception until its enactment into law. 1. Presidents message to the legislature

2. Policy of law

A statute of doubtful meaning must be given a construction that will promote public policy.

3. Purpose of law or mischief to be suppressed

The purpose or object of the law or the mischief intended to be suppressed are important factors to be considered in its construction.

This usually contains proposed legislative measures and indicates the Presidents thinking on the proposed legislation which, when enacted into law, follows his line of thinking into the matter.

4. Dictionaries

2. Explanatory note

3|Page

Statutory Construction Reviewer Based on Ruben F. Agpalos Statutory Construction

A short exposition of explanation accompanying a proposed legislation by its author or proponent. It contains statements of the reason or purpose of the bill, as well as arguments advanced by its author in urging its passage.

Where local statutes are patterned after or copied from those of another country, the decisions of courts in such country construing those laws are entitled to great weight in the interpretation of such local statutes.

3. Legislative debates, views and deliberations

9. Principles of common law

Where there is doubt as to what a provision of a statute means, that meaning which was put to the provision during the legislative deliberation or discussion on the bill may be adopted.

Courts may properly resort to common law principles in construing doubtful provisions of a statute, particularly where such a statute is modeled upon Anglo-American precedents.

4. Reports of commissions 10. Conditions at the time of the enactment

In construing the provisions of the code as thus enacted, courts may properly refer to the reports of the commission that drafted the code in aid of clarifying ambiguities therein.

5. Prior laws from which the statute is based

It is proper, in the interpretation of a statute, to consider the physical conditions of the country and the circumstances then obtaining which must of necessity affect its operation in order to understand the intent of the statute.

Legislative history will clarify the intent of the law or shed light on the meaning and scope of the codified or revised statute.

11. History of the times

6. Change in phraseology by amendments

The history of the times out of which the law grew and to which it may be rationally supposed to bear some direct relationship.

Courts may investigate the history of the provisions to ascertain legislative intent as to the meaning and scope of the amended law.

============================================

7. Amendment by deletion

CONTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION

The amendment statute should be given a construction different from that previous to its amendment.

The constructions placed upon statutes at the time of, or after, their enactment by the executive, legislature or judicial authorities, as well as those who, because of their involvement
4|Page

8. Adopted statutes

Statutory Construction Reviewer Based on Ruben F. Agpalos Statutory Construction

in the process of legislation, are knowledgeable of the intent and purpose of the law, such as draftsmen and bill sponsors. The contemporary construction is the strongest in law.

erroneous, it will control the interpretation of statutes by the courts.

1. Construction by an executive or administrative officer directly called to implement the law

May be express interpretation embodied in a circular, directive or regulation. May be implied a practice or mode of enforcement of not applying the statute to certain situations or of applying it in a particular manner; interpretation by usage or practice.

The best interpreter of law is usage. Interpretation by those charged with their enforcement is entitled to great weight by the courts. Contemporaneous construction is entitled to great weight because it comes from a particular branch of government called upon to implement the laws thus construed. Respect is due the government agency or officials charged with the implementation of the law for their competence, expertness, experience and informed judgment, and the fact that they are frequently the drafters of the law they interpret.

2. Construction by the Sec. of Justice as his capacity as the chief legal adviser of the government

In the form of opinions issued upon request of administrative or executive officials who enforce the law. President or Executive Secretary has the power to modify or alter or reverse the construction given by a department secretary.

The court may disregard contemporaneous construction when there is no ambiguity in the law, where the construction is clearly erroneous, where strong reason to the contrary exists, and where the court has previously given the statute a different interpretation.

3. Interpretation handed down in an adversary proceeding in the form of a ruling by an executive officer exercising quasi-judicial power

Such rulings need not have the detachment of a judicial, or semi-judicial decision, and may properly carry basis.

If through the misapprehension of the law an executive or administrative officer called upon to implement it has erroneously applied and executed it, the error may be corrected when the true construction is ascertained. Erroneous contemporaneous construction creates no vested right on the part of those who relied upon, and followed such construction. The rule is not absolute and admits exceptions in the interest of justice and fair play.

The contemporaneous construction is very probably the true expression of the legislative purpose, especially if the construction is followed for a considerable period of time. It is thus entitled to great weight and respect by the courts in the interpretation of the ambiguous provisions of law, and unless it is shown to be clearly

Legislative interpretation

Legislative interpretation of a statute is not controlling, but the courts may resort to it to clarify ambiguity in the language thereof.
5|Page

Statutory Construction Reviewer Based on Ruben F. Agpalos Statutory Construction

Legislative approval

The legislature is presumed to have full knowledge of a contemporaneous or practical construction of a statute. Legislative ratification is equivalent to a mandate.

If a statute is clear, plain and free from ambiguity, it must be given its literal meaning and applied without attempted interpretation. Verba legis non est recedendum, from the words of a statute there should be no departure. Dura lex sed lex

Reenactment

The most common act of legislative approval; the reenactment of a statute, previously given a contemporaneous construction, is a persuasive indication of the adaptation by the legislature of the prior construction.

The law is harsh, but it is still the law. It must be applied regardless of who may be affected, even if it may be harsh or onerous. When the language of the law is clear, no explanation of it is required.

Stare Decisis

============================================ DEPARTURE FROM LITERAL INTERPRETATION Statutes must be capable of construction or interpretation. If no judicial certainty can be had as to its meaning, the court is not at liberty to supply nor to make one.

The decision of the SC applying or interpreting a statute is controlling with respect to the interpretation of that statute and is of greater weight than that of an executive or administrative officer in the construction of other statutes of similar import. Past decisions of the court must be followed in the adjudication of cases: Stare decisis et non quieta movere, one should follow past precedents and should not disturb what has been settled. Where the court resolved a question merely sub silencio, its decision does not come within the maxim of stare decisis Nor does an opinion expressed by the way, not up to the point in the issue, fall within the maxim; it is merely an obiter dictum o An obiter dictum is an opinion expressed by a court upon some question of law which is not necessary to the decision of the case before it. It is a remark, by the way; it is not binding as a precedent. o The rule of stare decisis is not absolute. If found contrary to law, it must be abandoned.

What is within the spirit is within the law

When what the legislature had in mind is not accurately reflected in the language of the statute, resort is had to the principle that the spirit of the law controls its letter. Ratio legis, interpretation according to the spirit of the law.

============================================= Literal import must yield to intent LITERAL INTERPRETATION

6|Page

Statutory Construction Reviewer Based on Ruben F. Agpalos Statutory Construction

The intention of the legislature and its purpose or object controls the interpretation of particular language of a statute. Words ought to be more subservient to the intent and not the intent to the words.

Courts are not to give a statute a meaning that would lead to absurdities. Where there is ambiguity, such interpretation as will avoid inconvenience and absurdity is to be adopted.

Constructing to avoid injustice Construction to accomplish purpose

Statutes should be construed in the light of the object to be achieved and the evil or mischief to be suppressed, and they should be given construction as will advance the object, suppress the mischief, and secure the benefits intended.

Presumed that undesirable consequences were never intended as a legislative measure; that interpretation is to be adopted which is free from evil or injustice.

Construction to avoid danger to public interest

When reason of law ceases, law itself ceases

Reason for the law is the heart of the law. When the reason of the law ceases, the law itself ceases. The reason of the law is its soul.

Where great inconvenience will result, or great public interest will be endangered or sacrificed, or great mischief done, from a particular construction of the statute, such construction should be avoided.

Construction in favor of right and justice Supplying legislative omission

Where a literal import of the language of the statute shows that words have been omitted that should have been in the statute in order to carry out its intent and spirit, clearly ascertainable from its context, the courts may supply the omission to make the statute conform to the obvious intent of the legislature or to prevent the act from being absurd.

In case of doubt in the interpretation and application of the law, it is presumed that the lawmaking body intended right and justice to prevail. The fact that the statute is silent, obscure or insufficient with respect to a question before a court will not justify the latter from declining judgment. That one is perceived to tip the scales which the court believes will best promote the public welfare in its probable operation.

Correcting clerical errors Surplusage and superfluity disregarded

In order to carry out the intent of the legislature, the court may correct clerical errors, which, uncorrected, would render the statute meaningless.

The statute should be construed in accordance with the evident intent of the legislature without regard to the rejected word, phrase or clause.

Construction to avoid absurdity Redundant words may be rejected

7|Page

Statutory Construction Reviewer Based on Ruben F. Agpalos Statutory Construction

While the general rule is that every effort should be made to give some meaning to every part of the statute, there is no obligation to give every redundant word or phrase a special significance, contrary to the manifest intention of the legislature.

The jurisdiction to hear and decide cases is conferred only by the Constitution or by statute. The grant of jurisdiction to try actions carries with it all necessary and incidental powers to employ all writs, processes and other means essential to make its jurisdiction effective.

Obscure or missing words or false description may not preclude construction

Grant of power includes incidental power

Neither does false description neither preclude construction nor vitiate the meaning of a statute which is otherwise unclear.

Where a general power is conferred or duty enjoined, every particular power necessary for the exercise of one of the performance of the other is also conferred.

Exemption from rigid application of the law

Grant of power excludes greater power

Every rule is not without an exception. Where rigorous application may lead to injustice, the general rule should yield to occasional exceptions.

The foregoing principle implies the exclusion of those which are greater than conferred.

What is implied should not be against the law Law does not require the impossible

The law obliges no one to perform an impossible thing.

Number and gender 1. When the context of the statute indicates, words in plural include the singular, vice versa. 2. The masculine but not the feminine includes all genders, unless the context indicates otherwise. IMPLICATIONS

The statutory grant of power does not include such incidental power which cannot be exercised without violating the Constitution, the statute granting power, or other laws of the same subject.

Authority to charge against public funds may not be implied

Unless a statute expressly so authorizes, no claim against public finds may be allowed.

Illegality of act implied from prohibition

No statute can be enacted that can provide all the details involved in its application. What is implied in a statute is as much a part thereof as that which is expressed.

Grant of jurisdiction

Where a statute prohibits the doing of an act, the act done in violation thereof is by implication null and void. No man can be allowed to found a claim upon his own wrongdoing or inequity. No man should be allowed to take advantage of his own wrong. In Pari Delicto
8|Page

Statutory Construction Reviewer Based on Ruben F. Agpalos Statutory Construction

Exceptions to In Pari Delicto 1. It will not apply when its enforcement or application will violate an avowed fundamental policy or public interest 2. When the transaction is not illegal per se but merely prohibited, and the prohibition by law is designed for the protection of one party What cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly

What the law prohibits cannot, in some other way, be legally accomplished.

There should be no penalty for compliance with law A person who complies with a statute cannot, by implication, be penalized by it

9|Page