Você está na página 1de 20

Next Generation G-PON

Yuanqiu Luo, Huawei

FSAN NG-PON technology roadmap


NG-PON2

Capacity

Coexistence
enables gradual migration in the same ODN.

long-reach option
enable to overlay/multiple XG-PONs

NG-PON1 incl.
WDM option to

E.g. Higher-rate TDM, DWDM, CDM, OFDM, etc.

G-PON 1GE-PON

(Up: 2.5G or 10G, Down: 10G)

XG-PON

~2010

~2015

FSAN NG-PON taxonomy


NG-PON

NG-PON1 supports the coexistence with G-PON on the same ODN

NG-PON2 could be disruptive" with no requirement for coexistence with G-PON on the same ODN

Higher rate DWDM

-PONs Extended XG XG-PON

Higher rate OFDM

Higher rate ECDM

Hybrid DWDM/XG Hybrid DWDM PON XG-PON

Higher rate TDM

Other options

XG-PON1

XG-PON2 XG-PON2

FSAN and ITU-T Q2/SG15


Full Service Access Network (FSAN)
An interest group for the world's leading telecommunications services providers, independent test labs, and equipment suppliers to work towards a common goal of truly broadband fiber access networks 85 Members 31 operators, 46 vendors, 8 observers/test labs

ITU-T Q2/SG15
Question 2 of SG15, responsible for optical access networks 1997-2000, ATM-PON (A-PON), G.983 series 2001-2004, broadband PON (B-PON), G.983 series; gigabit PON (GPON), G.984 series 2005-2008, improved and extensive enhancement of G-PON 2009-2012, G.987/988 series (XG-PON) and other

FSAN members
Vendors Adtran ADVA Alcatel-Lucent Alphion BroadCom BroadLight Calix Cambridge Comtrend Cortina ECI Telecom Ericsson Finisar Freescale Fujitsu Gemfire Hisense-Ligent Hitachi Huawei JDS Uniphase Lantiq LG Nortel LS Cable Vendors Marvell Maxim Mitsubishi Motorola NEC NeoPhotonics Nokia Siemens Nortel Occam Networks Opencon OKI Optical Zonu Pannaway Phyworks PMC Sierra RAD TECOM Tellabs TXP Corporation Vitesse Zarlink Zhone ZTE Observer/ITL ETRI ICL/ITRI Iometrix LAN NTT-AT RITT Telcordia Univ. New Hampshire Operators AT&T Bell Canada British Telecom BSNL China Mobile China Telecom China Unicom Chunghwa Telecom CTBC Deutsche Telekom du ETISALAT France Telecom Korea Telecom Kuwait LPTIC NTT Portugal Telecom Qwest SaskTel SingTel SK Telecom/SK Broadband Embarq/Sprint Telecom Egypt Telecom Italia Telefonica Telecom Malaysia Telstra Telus Verizon Vodafone

FSAN and ITU-T Q2/SG15


FSAN Next Generation PON Task Group XG-PON Specifications
General Requirements PHY and Reach Extension TC Layer OMCI

NG-PON1 White Paper & XG-PON Contributions ITU-T Q2/SG15 G.987 Recommendation Series
G.987.1 for General Requirements G.987.2 for PHY and RE G.987.3 for TC Layer G.988 for OMCI

Mature technical spec in FSAN is delivered to ITU-T Q2/SG15 ITU-T Q2/SG15 drafts and standardizes PON spec

NG-PON1 candidate technologies


Physical split reduction (No new technology) WDM bidirectional split reduction (muxed G-PON) WDM downstream-only split reduction (stacked G-PON) XG-PON1: 10G down, Nx2.5G up XG-PON2: 10G symmetric Reach enhanced versions of the XG-PONs

The selection of XG-PON


Future Systems (NG-PON2)

Downstream
10G Nx2.5G
10/1G EPON XG-PON1 Muxed G-PON

10/10G EPON (XG-PON2)

Stacked G-PON

2.5G

G-PON Turbo EPON

Acceptable bandwidth asymmetry Upstream

1G

EPON

1.2G

2.5G

Nx1.2G

Nx2.5G

10G

XG-PON Architecture
Rx Tx

ONU

Central Office
XG-PON OLT
10G Tx Rx Tx

ONU

2.5G Rx

Rx Tx

ONU

G-PON OLT

WDM

Rx Tx

ONU

WBF

ONU

Single channel 10G DS, single channel 2.5G US TDM/TDMA Sharing ODN with G-PON

XG-PON wavelength plan

XG-PON Up

GPON up
1300 1320 1340 1360

1260

1280

GPON down
1480 1500

Guard band
1520 1540

XGVid Guard PON Guard Ovr band Dn band

1560

1580

1600

1620

1640

Coexistence with G-PON via WDM No interference on G-PON RF video channel

XG-PON layering structure


ONU management and control interface (OMCI) (G.988)
Management of equip, ANI & traffic, layer 2, layer 3, Eth service, xDSL, TDM service, voice, home networks

Higher layers (frames/packets of Eth, TDM, SDH, IP, ) XG-PON encapsulation method (XGEM) client

XG-PON

Transmission convergence (TC) (G.987.3)


Scrambler, FEC, DS/US frame structure, DBA control, PLOAM, XGEM, ONU activation, Timing, security, power saving, performance monitoring

Physical media dependent (PMD) (G.987.2)


Power budget, split ratio, distance, line code, line rate, wavelength, optical interface parameters

Fiber media

XG-PON for full service access G.987.1


CR CR

Metro core Service PoP


BRAS Metro Aggr SR

Metro aggregation CO
XG-PON OLT

Access
FTTCell

FTTH, FTTC FTTB, FTTO

Physical media dependent (PMD) layer G.987.2


Item Power budget Line rate Line code Split ratio Description
Norminal (29dB, 31dB), coexistence with deployed B+ ODN Extended (33dB, 35dB), coexistence with C+ ODN DS: 9.95328 Gb/s (10G nominal) US: 2.48832 Gb/s (2.5G nominal) Non-return-to-zero (NRZ) Minimum 1:64 1:128 &1:256 are of high interest Maximum fibre distance is at least 20 km TC layer supports maximum distance of 60 km TC layer supports maximum differential distance up to 40 km

Distance

Transmission convergence (TC) layer G.987.3


Item PHY adaptation XGTC framing Service adaptation Timing Security Power saving Description
FEC: DS RS(248,216); US RS(248,232) Scrambler: 58-bit frame-synchronous scrambling with preload Burst profile: adapt to different bursts DS & US frame, word alignment framing, enhanced PLOAM channel capacity, straightforward BWmap-based TDMA XGEM: service data unit encapsulation and fragmentation (up to 16K byte PDUs, key index) Time synchronization for mobile backhaul Mutual authentication, unicast/broadcast encryption & key management Integrity protection for PLOAM and OMCI Doze mode: ONU Rx alive, ONU optionally powering down Tx Cyclic sleep mode: In a cyclic sleep interval, ONU powers down Rx and Tx

ONU management and control interface (OMCI) G.988


Item OMCI enhancement Description
Extending B-PON/G-PON OMCI to support larger PDUs for enhanced efficiency Extending G-PON OMCI to support emerging services Strong mutual authentication and related management entities Improved fault and failure detection/notification via OMCI XG-PON interoperability, best practices of OMCI

Security improvement Fault management Implementers guide

XG-PON standard as a joint effort


G.987.1
General requirements

Anna Cui (AT&T), Fabrice Bourgart (FT), Junichi Kani (NTT)

G.987.2 Rapporteur: Frank Effenberger (Huawei)


PMD & RE

Richard Goodson (Adtran), Joe Smith (ALU)

G.987.3 Denis Khotimsky (Motorola), Yuanqiu Luo (Huawei), Transmission Hiroaki Mukai (Mitsubishi) convergence

G.988
OMCI

David Hood (Ericsson), Wei Lin (Huawei)

XG-PON standard progress


ITU-T Q2/SG15 study period (2009-2012)

May2009

ITU-T G.987 series editorship announcement, G.987 scope and living list review

Sep.2009

G.987, G.987.1, G.987.2 consent

June2010

G.987.3, G.988 consent

XG-PON field trial overview

XG-PON field trial performance

Physical layer - Compliant


XG-PON trial system meets G.987 specs on loss budget Wavelength: DS-1577.24nm (1577 nm), US-1268.8nm (1270 nm) Receive sensitivity: Meets G.987 specs Downstream = 10 Gbps, Upstream = 2.5 Gbps Ranging distance up to 35km No interference between the XG-PON signal and the existing G-PON signal No influence/interference on Video service

Throughput - Compliant

ODN - Compliant Coexistence with G-PON - Compliant RF video compatible - Compliant

Verizon field trail in 2009 showed no major technical issues with XG-PON Detailed field trail results were jointly reported by Verizon and Huawei in OFC2010 postdeadline paper Worlds First XG-PON Trial

Conclusions
FSAN / ITU-T has thought long and hard over the next PON
Coexistence with current deployment is key Cost effective bandwidth is the watch-word

XG-PON provides a good blend of characteristics


Compatibility with G-PON and GE-PON Higher bandwidth, with acceptable asymmetry High loss budget capabilities Low cost for equipment

Timeline
Comprehensive standards completed by June 2010 (this month!) First trial was in 2009 and showed no major technical issues Significant deployments in 2012

Você também pode gostar