Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Tavarez
Object - the raw material of that which is observed (that thing which is observed by
the observer, but has no immanently subjective things imposed upon or projected
onto it); the quantifiable or experiential aspect of a thing which is observed.
Let us take a step back now: the redness could also be described as an object
as well. How is this possible? The red can also be, however, and by being, it allows
itself to be interposed and have a certain relationship with other things which be,
inevitably (as being the reduction, it intervenes in the holistic). The essence of
redness therefore becomes translated and interconnected with other essences, of
which it is a tangent. For example, suppose smudges exist, and colors exist – the
color may preside somewhere in the existence. The essence of a smudge is, or at
least one of them is, its boundaries, while the second is its containing of something
within its boundaries, or having something immanent. I’m pretty sure those two
parts seeking to explain the essence of a smudge is not sufficient; however, we will
leave it so, as it is sufficient for my explanatory purposes. Now, the essence of a
color is that it is somehow representative of itself as an object. However, to do this,
it may start or stop from a certain boundary, and then those boundaries will have
By: Alex J. Tavarez
the immanent color. Through this, and by their essences, they’re able to connect to
each other as one object: “redsmudge.”
In the examples just aforementioned, black is simply a different forming for the
word blackness, and vice versa (though the root word for an adjective is usually a
noun – this makes sense, as will be explained later). This is exactly true of objects
and properties; as in the “redsmudge,” the red could be described as the property
of the smudge; however, the red is an object itself as well. It’s only, as has been
explained beforehand, a property because it compliments or fits or associates with
the essence of the smudge sufficiently so as to proclaim it a property of the
smudge.
The smudge cannot be the property of the redness; however, because the
essence of redness doesn’t allow for smudge to be subordinate to it, as fulfilling,
completing its essence or being sufficiently associated with it – it can work only vice
versa.
The redness can be a property of itself, because it completes itself to the extent
in which it needs itself as an object in order to fulfill its existence or identity rather.
Without redness having the quality of red, it would cease to be itself, and will
become that which was its other (as in that which is different from it). Thus, in order
for the red to be red, by tautology, it must have the property of redness – i.e. it
By: Alex J. Tavarez
must be a red redness. Thus, in the examples I showed, the following are not
possible:
2) The black redness. (Impossible; Note: this language may be used to mean the
“dark redness,” which makes sense – but such language is imprecise if used
to mean that)
Since there must be the property red in order for there to be redness, and vice
versa, then if there exists an object, there must be a property in it, and if there
exists a property, there must be an object from which it exists.
So: