Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
MBA Blogs Engineering Medical courses Mock-Tests Puzzles GD Preparation Cat PI Vocabulary Antonyms GMAT / CAT videos Chat Now! Contacts us
Latest news Latest news from education world.
Like
817
Against of Boys Banning smoke in public places is diminishing act for our personal freedom. Its choice of the people who are standing beside smokers that they want to stay there or go. Conclusion Smoking should be banned completely because smoking causes dangerous diseases like heart problem and cancer. Government should implement this rule strictly. Government should raise price of TOBACO products.
CMAT 2013 Additional Test Bachelors in Physiotherapy (B.P.T) B.Sc nursing (Bachelor of science nursing) MBBS in India Bachelor of Pharmacy in India Rise in GMAT score for indian students GMAT vs GRE 3 CMAT 2012 Pattern and Merit list Top 10 Best Medical Colleges In USA CAT going international
Read More
iPhone
FROM
Wardrobe
FROM
Music System
FROM
5,000
4,000
700
Email address:
(W ill not be share d.)
Topper Interviews part 2- IIM CAT, GMAT, GRE Topper Interviews part 1- IIM CAT, GMAT, GRE IIM CAT Test Day
Name: (m ax
100 characte r)
Points added by members session 2009 for IIMCAT aspirants Added by: hemalatha
Point: smoking in pubilc place government take severe action .this incidence affect the young generationrestricted ofarmful tabacco products.
www.studyfreak.com/gdHome.php?gd=24
1/5
3/19/13
Point: public smoking will create bad impression on our future generation.so,it shd be definately banned.
Point: smoking is ban in pblc place every one not smoking ,becoz smoking is harmful to our health,its creat so many deaseases like cancer,asthma..............nd heart problem.its ban in the film industry
Point: i agree with boys my consider girls also addidected to smoking...and smoking should be banned completely
Point: twe the common ppl cant do anythng in this bt the stronget power is with goverment....... govt. shld take serious steps against ithh... can rise the price of the particular product... evry thng is in the govt hand..why it is not serous although he can strictly bann the product nd can save many innocent lives..govt shld not sit idle nd tak silly nd slow decision bt shld awake nd tak strict decision..
Point: YES OBOUSLY GOVERMENT IS IGNORE IT BECAUSE MOST INCOME OF TAMBACO PRODUCTS . I THINK TAMBACO ALL PRODUCTS HAVE BANED. BECAUSE THIS IS HARMFUL OUR BODY ALSO MENTEL. MEANS THIS TYPE OF AUDICTION.
Point: if we are banning the smoking then the government should make such places where we can consume TOBACO.there should be a rule to enter that area. eg you should have more than 18..so that we can apart such kind of activity from our selves and from the children who are below 18.
www.studyfreak.com/gdHome.php?gd=24
2/5
3/19/13
Point: it a right as we know that smoking is harmfull to health not only those who smok but also to those person who smal it
Point: smoking to create our atmosphere very bad and so govertnment must take the action about on it and government would take class on colleges or school to create awareness in students
Point: for some ppl smoking is a part of their regular life.It is the choice of the passive smoker whether to stay beside the smoker or not.
Point: one of the major reasons of house hold fire is people smoke in their bed,so banning will promote people to smoke at their place and might increase the house hold fire chances,instead of banning smoking at public places more effort should be done to make people aware of the ill effects of it and motivate people to quit smoking
Point: Smoking should be banned in public space regarding its harmful effects but there is a fact what to do with those people who are addicted to smoke. Govt. Should make some smoking zones for this persons to as they are also have their rights. There is nothing written in our Constitution that smoking should be prohibited.
Point: if atractive or likely produts are shown to people they will surely buy,so tobaco should no be entered into the market for sales
Point: Banning smoke in public place is favorable act but it is not vivacious still.. strict Laws must be formulated so that every individual bears in mind incessantly :-)
Point: yes,smoking in a public place should be banned completely bcoz dis alongwid environmental pollution also cause dirt n garbage. most of d tym smoker throw away burnt out cigarette on public place widout any concern for cleaniness of road n
www.studyfreak.com/gdHome.php?gd=24
3/5
3/19/13
gardens.
Point: its not about freedom its your freedom but you cannot risk someones health due to your freedom
Point: govt. has already banned smoking .there are a lot of peole who are against this rule .so fo rule breaker strict decidion should be taken.because health is wealth
Point: Smoke contains hundreds of toxic chemicals including arsenic ammonia, hydrogen cyanide, formaldehyde, benzene, and vinyl chloride. It is known to cause cancer, coronary heart disease, and respiratory problems. There is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke.Non smokers should not be subjected to this disgusting habit.
Point: from my point of view.. gov should banish smoking completely.. it not oly affect the person who s smoking.. it also affect and trobles the person who s nearer to them.. gov should make some steps of everyone inderstanding the consequence of smoking
Point: smoking is injerous to health...we see this slogen on every packet of cigrette but still ppl want's to die so what can we do for that. there's maximum numbr of death causes due to smoking which causes lung cancer.there are 40000 of harmful components in cigrette. so ppl be aware and stop smoking for long and happy life.
Point: i should belive that smoking banned for yung peapole.many young people smoke and creat very dangerious deases similar cancer and heart .so,everypeople good implement for avoid smoking.
Point: smoking should be banned in public places as it harmful for the health as well as it sets a wrong example for teenagers.
www.studyfreak.com/gdHome.php?gd=24
4/5
3/19/13
Point: Govt. should ban to smokers in public place & also smoke products.
Point: instead of increasing the rate of tobacco products the government should ban those products
CAT XAT Practice Questions | Top B Schools in India | CAT Forums | GDPI Topics | Cool Text | CAT Mailing List CAT Pattern | Why an MBA? | online mba program | Privacy Policy
www.studyfreak.com/gdHome.php?gd=24
5/5