Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
CONTENTS 1. Background Political and Administrative Environment 2. The Government Departments involved in Urban Development 3. The Issues: by sector 4. The proposed approach and the changing role of Government 5. Some conclusions
development Decentralisation without devolution Reluctance/lack of experience in lower levels of government to making decisions Lack of Capacity Lack of Policy Lack of Data No long-term comprehensive development plan Lack of Legislative foundation for spatial planning or urban development Top heavy approval system for plans 32 Ministers The forthcoming Elections in 2015
Stakeholder Consultation Order 27/2013 introduced some representation on the Development Committees (does not apply to the major cities) No representative council below level of State/Region, except at Ward level. Traditional consultation with the yami yapa (the parents of the community)
Ministry of Construction
Two DGs, one for Public Works and one for Human Settlements and Housing Development. Public works concerned with National Roads and Government buildings DHSHD responsible for Spatial Planning and Housing, including government land management, government housing projects, including public housing, rental housing, upgrading, serviced plots and Special Economic Zones
1. Global Warming Cyclone Nargis hit Myanmar in 2010. Reported that up to 200,000 people died. Overall climate vulnerability factor to 2030 is classified as acute (Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Sydney. WASH Sector Brief. 2011).
The Myanmar Quickstep, Myanmars progress in urban development 9. Finance Sources of local government income: Property Tax Wheels Tax Alcohol Tax Toll and Irrigation Fees Construction Fees Central Government subventions Loans with approval of central government Local Government receives back about 7-10 percent of what it collects for central government Utility charges not related to real costs Contracts for services delivered by private sector often unrelated to performance except in most basic way (e.g. Water project in Mandalay)
The Myanmar Quickstep, Myanmars progress in urban development Government as Facilitator not as Implementer 3 Regions and States Temporary department and will form decentralised departments at State and Region level Will receive hands-on training under the Urban and Regional Planning Department All changes under discussion, but are in government draft Housing development is being decentralised, but in present political climate with the forthcoming 2015 Elections, the Government wants to be seen to be delivering. Hence large scale Government housing projects still being proposed. Also the creation of a National Housing Development Board. Not integrated with decentralised development departments.
CONCLUSIONS
Myanmars Government style is dominated by the military thinking. Extension of institutionalised democracy slow Devolution of power limited. Fundamentals of reform taking a back seat because of election pressures. Too few qualified middle and senior staff. Positions still given to Armed forces personnel. English is rarely spoken by those less than 40 years old, which makes transfer of knowledge and skills by international experts a problem.
Thank You