Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The benefits of inclusive education are numerous for both students with and without disabilities. Benefits of Inclusion for Students With Disabilities 1. Friendships 2. Increased social initiations, relationships and networks 3. Peer role models for academic, social and behavior skills 4. Increased achievement of IEP goals 5. Greater access to general curriculum 6. Enhanced skill acquisition and generalization 7. Increased inclusion in future environments 8. Greater opportunities for interactions 9. Higher expectations 10. Increased school staff collaboration 11. Increased parent participation 12. Families are more integrated into community Benefits of Inclusion for Students Without Disabilities 1. Meaningful friendships 2. Increased appreciation and acceptance of individual differences 3. Increased understanding and acceptance of diversity 4. Respect for all people 5. Prepares all students for adult life in an inclusive society 6. Opportunities to master activities by practicing and teaching others
7. Greater academic outcomes 8. All students needs are better met, greater resources for everyone There is not any research that shows any negative effects from inclusion done appropriately with the necessary supports and services for students to actively participate and achieve IEP goals.
Students are in their home schools, general education classes o Where the students would be if they did not have disabilities Appropriate Supports and Services
o o
Based on individual's and needs. Supports follow the students, the students don't go somewhere to get them
Obstacles are issues waiting for solutions "Teams" are proactive, addressing needs before problems arise Inclusion is a process, not an event All team members actively seek out information and resources All team members have a shared vision of what success looks like
Classroom, building and district decisions and planning reflect the needs of students with disabilities
Active Participation
o o
Exclusion can happen in a general education environments All activities are designed to be accessible for all students
All students are valued Social goals are integrated within class activities for all students Adults model and facilitate inclusion and interactions
Natural proportions
o
Same proportion of students with disabilities are in classes as are in the general population Students with disabilities are not grouped All classes practice inclusion, none are referred to as "inclusion classes"
o o
o o
There are no prerequisites for inclusion Staff are trained based on students' needs
General and special education staff have ownership of students with disabilities All team members collaborate and communicate frequently
Sensitivity and awareness are interwoven throughout Universal design and curriculum are utilized first People 1st language is promoted and used in all environments All students get what they need based on individuals, not labels All students count in assessments and evaluations
In general, when people describe being included they use words such as happy, accepted, welcomed, friendship, love, valued and togetherness. When people describe being excluded, they use words like, isolated, lonely, dejected, angry, sad, abandoned and depressed. If the general thought is that inclusion makes people feel good, then why wouldnt it be for everyone? A goal of education is to help children reach their potential and become productive members of society. When people feel good, they have a greater capacity to function to their potential in every aspect of their lives. There are sports, clubs, assemblies, and other non-academic activities that help children become well rounded and more receptive to learning. If overall needs are important for all children, they are equally important to the growth of a child with a disability too. If a child happens to have a disability he or she is still first and foremost a child. That child has the same basic needs of health and physical fitness; social and a sense of belonging; mental challenges and stimulation; spiritual and a sense of meaning and purpose, as any other child. When all these needs are met in an integrated way, a child can function better in every area of his or her life. Unmet needs affect the childs overall well-being and his or her potential to function and learn. Meeting all of a childs needs should not be conditional upon placement. Being physically placed in the regular class should never mean that any needs are sacrificed. Additional needs can be met that can not be met in an excluded setting. My definition of inclusion in education is "the act of attending regular education classes, with the supports and services needed to successfully achieve the individual's IEP goals, while actively participating in activities as a member of the class who belongs." I believe inclusion is a desired state to be achieved, that may or may not occur by simple placement alone. It is an ongoing process. I believe that unless a child has a sense of identity with the class, and unless he or she has the supports and services needed and is reaching his or her IEP goals then inclusion has not been achieved. Yes, this does define inclusion only in the terms of success, but I truly believe that inclusion only means success. With that definition in mind, who is inclusion not for?
Paula Kluth, Richard A. Villa and Jacqueline S. Thousand Common misunderstandings about schools' legal responsibilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act have slowed implementation of the law. School authorities who understand the law can provide a better education for all students. In 1975, Congress passed the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (Public Law 94-142), guaranteeing for the first time that all students with disabilities would receive a public education. The law, whose name changed in subsequent reauthorizations in 1990 and 1997 to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Public Law 101-476; Public Law 105-17), set the stage for inclusive schooling, ruling that every child is eligible to receive a free and appropriate public education and to learn in the least restrictive environment possible. Specifically, the law ensures that to the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children in public or private institutions and other care facilities, are educated with children who are not disabled. (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1412 [a][5]) In 1994, the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Special Education Programs issued policy guidelines stating that school districts cannot use the lack of adequate personnel or resources as an excuse for failing to make a free and appropriate education available, in the least restrictive environment, to students with disabilities. Schools have taken much time to implement the law. Although many schools and districts have been educating students with disabilities in inclusive settings for years, families often still have to fight to get their children into general education classrooms and inclusive environments. An analysis of U.S. Department of Education reports found that in the dozen years between 1977 and 1990, placements of students with disabilities changed little. By 1990, for example, only 1.2 percent more students with disabilities were in general education classes and resource room environments: 69.2 percent in 1990 compared with 68 percent in 1977. Placements of students with disabilities in separate classes declined by only 0.5 percent: 24.8 percent in 1990 compared with 25.3 percent in 1977. And, students with disabilities educated in separate public schools or other separate facilities declined by only 1.3 percent: 5.4 percent of students with disabilities in 1990 compared with 6.7 percent of students with disabilities in 1977 (Karagiannis, Stainback, & Stainback, 1996). More recently, the National Council on Disability (2000) released similar findings. Investigators discovered that every state was out of compliance with the requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and that U.S.
officials are not enforcing compliance. Even today, schools sometimes place a student in a self-contained classroom as soon as they see that the student is labeled as having a disability. Some students enter self-contained classrooms as soon as they begin kindergarten and never have an opportunity to experience regular education. When families of students with disabilities move to a different district, the new school sometimes moves the student out of general education environments and into segregated classrooms. In some cases, districts may be moving slowly toward inclusive education, trying to make a smooth transition by gradually introducing teachers and students to changebut moving slowly cannot be an excuse for stalling when a learner with a disability comes to school requiring an inclusive placement. Clearly, more than 25 years after the law came into effect, many educators and administrators still do not understand the law or how to implement it. Three common misunderstandings still determine decisions about students with disabilities in U.S. schools.
If schools can successfully educate a student with disabilities in general education settings with peers who do not have disabilities, then the student's school must provide that experience.
having the same skills and abilities that others in the class may have. In addition, this example highlights ways in which students with disabilities can work on individual skills and goals within the context of general education lessons. Most important, his teachers designed and put in place the supports and adaptations that Malcolm needed for success. Malcolm did not have to display all the skills and abilities of other students to participate. Instead, Malcolm's teachers created a context in which Malcolm could demonstrate competence. For Malcolm to be successful in his classroom, his teachers need to provide him with a range of "supplemental supports, aids, and services," one of the law's requirements (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1412 [a] [5]). Supports, aids, and services might include a piece of assistive technology, use of an education consultant, instruction from a therapist, support from a paraprofessional, peer tutors, different seating or environmental supports, modified assignments, adapted materials (such as large-print books, graphic organizers, or color-coded assignment books), curriculum that is differentiated to meet the needs of the learner, time for teachers' collaborative planning, coteaching, training for school personnel, or any number of other strategies, methods, and approaches. Schools do not need to provide every support available, but they must provide those required by the student with disabilities. Families do not have to prove to the school that a student with disabilities can function in the general classroom. In Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District (1993), for example, a U.S. circuit court determined that the neighborhood school of Raphael Oberti, a student with Down's syndrome, had not supplied him with the supports and resources he needed to be successful in an inclusive classroom. The judge also ruled that the school had failed to provide appropriate training for his educators and support staff. The court placed the burden of proof for compliance with the law's inclusion requirements squarely on the school district and the state instead of on the family. In other words, the school had to show why this student could not be educated in general education with aids and services, and his family did not have to prove why he could. The federal judge who decided the case stated, "Inclusion is a right, not a special privilege for a select few."
Across the United States, many school districts still operate programs for discrete groups of students. Separate programs and classrooms exist for students identified with certain labelsemotional disabilities, for exampleand for students with perceived levels of need, such as severe or profound disabilities. In many cases, students enter these self-contained settings without an opportunity to receive an education in a general classroom with the appropriate aids and services. In 1983, the Roncker v. Walter case challenged the assignment of students to disability-specific programs and schools. The ruling favored inclusive, not segregated, placement and established a principle of portability. The judge in the case stated, It is not enough for a district to simply claim that a segregated program is superior. In a case where the segregated facility is considered superior, the court should determine whether the services which make the placement superior could be feasibly provided in a nonsegregated setting (i.e., regular class). If they can, the placement in the segregated school would be inappropriate under the act (IDEA). (Roncker v. Walter, 1983, at 1063) The Roncker court found that placement decisions must be determined on an individual basis. School districts that automatically place students in a predetermined type of school solely on the basis of their disability or perceived level of functioning rather than on the basis of their education needs clearly violate federal laws.
Are all students in the least restrictive environment? Are we providing students with disabilities with the necessary supplemental supports, aids, and services? Do teachers and administrators understand their responsibilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Do teachers and administrators talk about inclusive education as if it were a choice that can be made by a school or by a teacher?
School district leaders and school principals who understand the federal law can avoid lawsuits, enhance education experiences for students with and without disabilities, and move toward the development of school communities that are egalitarian, just, and democratic for all.
References
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Public Law 94-142 (1975). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. (1997). Karagiannis, A., Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1996). Historical overview of inclusion. In S. Stainback & W. Stainback (Eds.), Inclusion: A guide for educators (pp. 1728). Baltimore: Brookes. National Council on Disability. (2000, January 25). Back to school on civil rights. (NCD #00-283). Washington, DC: Author. Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District, 995 F.2d 1204 (3rd Cir. 1993). Osborne, A. G. (1996). Legal issues in special education. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Roncker v. Walter, 700 F.2d 1058 (6th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 864 (1983). Villa, R., & Thousand, J. (Eds.). (2000a). Restructuring for caring and effective education. Baltimore: Brookes. Villa, R. & Thousand, J. (2000b). Setting the context: History of and rationales for inclusive schooling. In R. Villa & J. Thousand (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together (pp. 737). Baltimore: Brookes. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paula Kluth (pkluth@syr.edu) is an assistant professor in the Department of Teaching and Leadership, Syracuse University, 150 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244. Richard A. Villa (ravillabayridge@cs.com) is President, Bayridge Consortium, 767 Pebble Beach Dr., San Marcos, CA 92069. Jacqueline S. Thousand (jthousand@csusm.edu) is a professor in the College of Education, California State UniversitySan Marcos, San Marcos, CA 92096. Copyright 2001 by Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Volume 59 Number 4 December 2001/January 2002 http://www.ascd.org/
WHAT IS INCLUSIVE EDUCATION ? Inclusive education is a system of education in which all the pupils with special educational needs are enrolled in ordinary classes in their district schools, and are provided with support services and an education based on their forces and needs. Inclusive schools are based on the basic principle that all schoolchildren in a given community should learn together, so far as is practicable, regardless of their handicaps or difficulties. They should recognize and take into account the diverse needs of their pupils, adapt to different styles and rhythm of teaching and provide quality education through the appropriate use of resources, school organization and study plans as well as partnership with the community. There is need to ensure that the services provided correspond exactly to the special needs, regardless of their grades.
The international perspective: The United Nations and other international organizations are encouraging the development of inclusive education systems for a number of reasons. The most important reason is the human rights for all children to receive education. Providing education for all children in one educational system has educational, social and economical advantages:
Regular schools with this inclusive orientation are the most effective means of combating discriminatory attitudes, creating welcoming communities, building an inclusive society and achieving education for all; moreover, they provide an effective education to all the majority of children and improve the efficiency and ultimately the cost-effectiveness of the entire education system
(The Salamanca Statement, United Nations, 1994)
All children benefit from Inclusive Education. Inclusive teachers are good teachers because of their ability to use a wide variety of teaching and assessment methods. The advantages of inclusive education go beyond just academics, and also benefit children socially by teaching them responsibility, tolerance, and cooperation skills. Purpose of PAIE To provide a platform for teachers of mainstream and special schools to meet and learn together about Inclusive Education. PAIE Activities Monthly workshops on the second Saturday of the month Short courses Production of a 6-monthly newsletter Raising awareness in members schools and the wider community.
Membership
Any teacher/individual who believes that Children with Special Needs should be given the opportunity to study in a mainstream school. Annual fee for individuals is Rs.200/ Any school that is planning to work or already working towards becoming an Inclusive School. Annual fee for schools is Rs.500/-. We hope that members will be actively involved by co-facilitating workshops, helping with the newsletter, or serving on the PAIE Working Committee.
Months
January
Topics Facing differences: overcoming fears " Recognizing our feelings as we start to include children with special needs in our classrooms
Speech Problems Story Telling
Mar May
June - July
August
Oct
Dec
5 Day Summer sessions " What makes a good inclusive teaching team" Science in the classroom- joint session with SAP AUTISM: teaching strategies in the classroom Chronic health problems - joint session with HEALTH
Contact Details:
Inclusive Education (IE) is a strategy contributing towards the ultimate goal of promoting an inclusive society, one which enables all children/adults, whatever their gender, age, ability, ethnicity, impairment or HIV status, to participate in and contribute to that society. Difference is respected and valued. Discrimination and prejudice will be actively combated in policies, institutions and behaviour.
Education is the right of all children, and IE aims to ensure that all children have access to an appropriate, relevant, affordable and effective education within their community. This education starts in the home with the family, and includes formal, non-formal and all types of community-based education initiatives. Within schools IE is an approach which aims to develop a child-focus by acknowledging that all children are individuals with different learning needs and speeds. Teaching and learning can become more effective, relevant and fun for all. Therefore IE will always be good for all schools, although all schools may not be good for all children. IE is part of development, and development should be inclusive, i.e. responding to the needs of real people who are all different. As with all children, disabled children have a range of basic needs which need to be met in order for them to benefit from education. These include nutrition, acceptance, love and basic health care. Poverty and lack of basic infrastructure (roads, transport) affects childrens access to education, including disabled children. Whatever the level of socio/economic development, the education of disabled children should be seen as integral to the development of education for all children. Many of the problems which exclude disabled children from education are a result of exclusive planning: planning should be inclusive. IE is the responsibility of both government and community, requiring collaboration between sectors and extensive participation. Supporting and involving families is central to IE, as the family has prime responsibility for the care and education of their children (whether disabled or not). Community Based Rehabilitieation (CBR) as a component of community development can help meet basic and specific needs of disabled children, such as access to braille and sign and mobility aids. CBR may also have a direct role in supporting the education of children with severe and multiple disabilities, both in the context of their own homes and in day care facilities. Issues of disabled identity and discrimination need to be addressed as part of an IE strategy. In order to combat discrimination and to promote positive identity in disabled children, disabled role models should be accessible to all children, schools should employ disabled teachers, and curriculum materials should reflect the existence of disabled people in society in positive ways. As a catalyst for change IE provides not only school improvement but an increased awareness of human rights which leads to a reduction of discrimination. By finding local answers to complex problems it empowers communities and can lead to wider community development. IE addresses a real need, is a readily understandable concept and requires no new major resources. It primarily involves changes of attitudes and behaviour. It has the potential to be a very effective starting point for addressing the Rights of the Child in a range of cultures and contexts. Note on use of terms The term Integrated Education generally refers to an approach which has focused on helping disabled children and children with learning difficulties benefit from mainstream
schooling. As a result of initial efforts to respond to the needs of children with disability/learning difficulties, schools become more flexible and child-centred and therefore enable other marginalised groups to benefit. The term Inclusive Education is a more accurate term which reflects our common goal. However, many programmes will continue to use the term Integrated Education where this is more meaningful and familiar in that context and culture. Specific Terms used in Relation to Children and Learning Guiding Principles Every child is different, and there is no fixed dividing line between disabled children and non-disabled children, or between children with learning difficulties, and those without. Whatever language is used, it is important that it is clearly understood, promotes positive attitudes and practice, and does not stigmatise. Therefore different terms will be appropriate in different contexts and cultures. Language should not be used for labelling children, but rather for highlighting problems and improving practice. Whatever term is used, the words child or children should be added, e.g. children with learning difficulties. Impairment This commonly refers to the lack of part or all of a limb, a defective limb, organism or mechanism of the body. Children with different impairments (e.g. ranging from missing finger, club foot, epilepsy, facial scar to severe brain damage) can be excluded from education for different reasons. These include negative attitudes, lack of physical access/transport, and rigid teaching methods in schools. Having an impairment (e.g. short sight, missing finger) does not automatically mean that the person is disabled. Disability Save the Children Fund (SCF) views disability as a social and development issue, not a medical one. In this context, a child with an impairment is disabled when, in their particular context and culture, they are excluded from society/education or discriminated against. The term does not just refer to physically disabled children but includes any impairments (such as the less visible hearing impairment). The term handicapped is generally felt to be not appropriate in most English-speaking societies (coming from cap-in-hand and evoking a passive charity model). Where it is still used, it often refers to people with severe impairment who are handicapped by society, and may be used interchangeably with the term disability. Special Educational Needs This term arose out of the realisation by educationalists that not all disabled children (e.g. those who used wheelchairs) had problems learning, and that many children without obvious impairments were failing in schools. It represented a move away from focusing on a medical condition to acknowledging different learning needs and speeds. However, it is unfortunately still used to label individual children, rather than highlight problems in the system. It is positive concept when it helps schools to become more child-focused and flexible but it does have its limits and is not possible to define precisely. United Nations
Educational Scientific & Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) uses the term children with special needs to refer to street children and other marginalised groups. Learning Difficulty Children do not have a fixed ability to learn. All children can learn, and any child may experience difficulty. Their learning is affected by a wide range of factors including the home and school environment, skills/methods of teachers and cultural perceptions of what types of learning are valued and given status. Children with learning difficulty is used to refer to children who are not succeeding in mainstream schools. But often their lack of success is to do with poor teaching methods and lack of appropriate support for their learning. So it is a term which should not be used to label children. However some children (e.g. those with conditions such as Down's Syndrome or iodine deficiency, or brain injury) may learn at very different rates and with certain overall (but broad) limits. Mental Handicap In some societies, children with severe learning difficulties has replaced the terms mental handicap/retardation which encourage stigma and focus on a perceived defect. In other societies, mental handicap may be a big improvement on mad or idiot and so is appropriate for the time being (see Guiding Principles).
Lesotho Pre-1988: SCF ran hostels for boys with polio while they attended mainstream schools and for visually impaired boys while they attended a resource centre for blind people. SCF was considered the lead agency on disability in Lesotho. 1988: Regional disability advisor visited Lesotho and started policy negotiations on IE. Collaboration with the Ministry of Education began. 1991: SCF advisor appointed to coordinate national IE programme. Morocco 1993: CBR programme began in Khemisset, including small classes for hearing impaired and mentally disabled children. Lobbying and advocacy at national level to promote IE. Some Examples of Programmes with an IE Component Swaziland: Pre-school IE is a component of CBR programme. Zanzibar: IE in mainstream primary is a component of CBR programme. South Africa: Pre-school IE component in several CBR programmes and in work with NGOs. Zimbabwe: IE in pre-schools is part of commercial farm workers programme. Mozambique: As part of CBR. Small signing groups for deaf children. West Bank: Outreach programme and sponsorship. Summary of IE Literature Search Sparse, dominated by a small elite. Misleading and unreliable use of hard data in relation to formal provision of education to disabled children. Reinforces negative deficit model of developing country. Concepts confused and unexamined, e.g. what is meant by the term special needs? Cross-cultural issues not addressed.
Inclusive school
Inclusive education is about the education of all children in mainstream schools and classrooms and the recent drive toward inclusive education is about more than disability or special educational needs. It reflects changes in the social and political climate wherein a new approach characterizes thinking about difference. In recent debate about inclusion, a premium is placed upon full participation by all and respect for the rights of others. Discussion about the benefits of an inclusive society assumes that a society which can nurture, develop and use the skills, talents and strengths of all its members will enlarge its collective resources and ultimately is likely to be more at ease with itself. These changes in thinking are espoused in much recent discourse about education. Increasingly, this discourse emphasises learners rights as well as their needs, and stresses the importance of an education free from discrimination and segregation.
LEGISLATION The new anti-discriminatory climate has provided the basis for much change in policy and statute, nationally and internationally. Inclusion has been enshrined as segregation and discrimination have been rejected and outlawed. Articulations of the new developments in ways of thinking, in policy and in law include: The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) which sets out childrens rights in respect of freedom from discrimination and in respect of the representation of their wishes and views. The UNESCO Salamanca Statement (1994) which calls on all governments to give the highest priority to inclusive education.
educational communities where the needs of all students and teachers are truly met. Inclusive schools no longer provide "regular education" and "special education". Instead, inclusive schools provide an inclusive education and as a result students will be able to learn together. In other words, it is open to all students, and that ensure that all students learn and participate. For this to happen, teachers, schools and systems may need to change so that they can better accommodate the diversity of needs that pupils have and that they are included in all aspects of school-life. It also means identifying any barriers within and around the school that hinder learning and participation, and reducing or removing these barriers. Inclusive education is a process of enabling all students, including previously excluded groups, to learn and participate effectively within mainstream school systems. Placing excluded students within a mainstream setting does not of itself achieve inclusion.
Principles
Every student has an inherent right to education on basis of equality of opportunity. No student is excluded from, or discriminated within education on grounds of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, disability, birth, poverty or other status. All students can learn and benefit from education. Schools adapt to the needs of students, rather than students adapting to the needs of the school. The students views are listened to and taken seriously. Individual differences between students are a source of richness and diversity, and not a problem. The diversity of needs and pace of development of students are addressed through a wide and flexible range of responses.
Practice
The practice of developing inclusive schools involves:
Understanding inclusion as a continuing process, not a one-time event. Strengthening and sustaining the participation of all students, teachers, parents and community members in the work of the school. Restructuring the cultures, policies and practices in schools to respond to the diversity of pupils within their locality. Inclusive settings focus on identifying and then reducing the barriers to learning and participation, rather than on what is "special" about the individual student or group of students, and targeting services to address the "problem". Providing an accessible curriculum, appropriate training programs for teachers, and for all students, the provision of fully accessible information, environments and support. Identifying and providing support for staff as well as students.
A somewhat different model is implemented by Hands On Learning Australia wherein disengaged students, as well as some students with special needs, are taken out of class one day per week and put into an alternative cross-age peer group to develop strong relationships and enable them to better cope with mainstream classes.
Teaching/programming
It is general practice that students in an inclusive classroom are with their chronological age-mates. Also, to encourage a sense of belonging, emphasis is placed on the value of friendships. Teachers often nurture a relationship between a student with special needs and a peer without need. Another common practice is the assignment of a buddy to accompany a student with special needs at all times (for example in the cafeteria, on the playground, on the bus and so on). In principle, several factors can determine the success of inclusive classrooms:
Family-school partnerships Collaboration between general and special educators Well-constructed Individualized Education Program plans Team planning and communication Integrated service delivery Ongoing training and staff development
Games designed to build community Involving students in solving problems Songs and books that teach community Openly dealing with individual differences Assigning classroom jobs that build community Teaching students to look for ways to help each other Utilizing physical therapy equipment such as standing frames, so students who typically use wheelchairs can stand when the other students are standing and more actively participate in activities
Benefits
Inclusive education is claimed by its advocates to have many benefits for the students. Instructional time with peers without need helps the learners to learn strategies taught by the teacher. Teachers bring in different ways to teach a lesson for special needs students and peers without need. All of the students in the classroom benefit from this. The students can now learn from the lesson how to help each other. Socialization in the school allows the students to learn communication skills and interaction skills from each other. Students can build friendships from these interactions. The students can also learn about hobbies from each other. A friendship in school is important for the development of learning. When a student has a friend the student can relate to a member of the classroom.
Students being able to relate to each other gives them a better learning environment. Involving peers without need with special needs peers gives the students a positive attitude towards each other. The students are the next generation to be in the workforce; the time in the classroom with the special needs and peers without need will allow them to communicate in the real world someday. Special needs students are included in all aspects of school-life. For example, homeroom, specials such as art and gym, lunch, recess, assemblies, and electives. Special needs students involved in these classrooms will give them the time they need to participate in activities with their peers without need. Awareness should be taught to students that will be in the classroom with the special needs peers. The teacher can do a puppet show, show a movie, or have the student talk to the class. The teacher could also read a book to help the student describe his or her special need. The class can ask questions about what they learned and what they want to know. This will help when the students are together in the classroom. Positive modeling is important for the students in the classroom. Positive modeling is the teacher showing a good example towards both special needs and peers without need this will help the students to get along more.
Criticism
This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2007) Opponents of inclusive schools believe that individual differences will slow the progress of students without special needs. Therefore, this will create problems for teachers. Some argue that inclusive schools are not a cost-effective response when compared to cheaper or more effective interventions, such as special education. They argue that special education helps "fix" the special needs students by providing individualized and personalized instruction to meet their unique needs. This is to help students with special needs adjust as quickly as possible to the mainstream of the school and community. Proponents counter that students with special needs are not fully into the mainstream of student life because they are secluded to special education. Some argue that isolating students with special needs may lower their self-esteem and may reduce their ability to deal with other people. In keeping these students in separate classrooms they aren't going to see the struggles and achievements that they can make together. More recently, post-modern and post-structuralist approaches have also led to critiques of mainstream thinking on inclusion. Broadly, these have explored the exclusionary influence of the language that is characteristic of most current debates on inclusion, going on to challenge the relations of power and hierarchy that operate in much inclusive education. Julie Allan, for example, examines the ideas of the 'philosophers of difference' Gilles Deleuze, Michael Foucault and Jacques Derrida - and puts them to work on inclusion (Allan 2008). She argues that these ideas allow the task of including children to be reframed, and offer not solutions, but different ways of working which involve altering adult-child relationships subverting, subtracting, and inventing and restructuring teacher education recognition, rupture and repair. She also advocates making greater
use of the arts to challenge exclusion, disrupt boundaries, and establish more inclusive practices.
Notes
1. ^ http://www.bps.org.uk/downloadfile.cfm?file_uuid=CE1DCB9D-1143-DFD07EA9-5C1B82EA4596&ext=doc British Psychological Society position statement on inclusive education 2. ^ Scheyer et al. (1996). The Inclusive Classroom Teacher Created Materials, Inc. The Inclusive Classroom 3. ^ http://armlawreview.org/guide/Hamazasp%20Harutyunyan.doc 4. ^ Teaching Students with Severe Disabilities third edition, David L. Westling and Lise Fox
See also
Inclusion (education) Post Secondary Transition For High School Students with Disabilities Mara Sapon-Shevin Teaching for social justice
References
Inclusive Education:
Ainscow M., Booth T. (2003) The Index for Inclusion: Developing Learning & Participation in Schools. Bristol: Center for Studies in Inclusive Education Allan, J. (2008) Rethinking Inclusive Education: The philosophers of difference in practice, Dordrecht: Springer Thomas, G., & Loxley, A. (2007) Deconstructing Special Education and Constructing Inclusion (2nd Edition). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Elementary programming for inclusive classrooms Social development: Promoting Social Development in the Inclusive Classroom M. Mastropieri, Thomas E. Scruggs. The Inclusive Classroom: Strategies for Effective Instruction Mary Beth Doyle. The Paraprofessional's Guide to the Inclusive Classroom Conrad M., & Whitaker T. (1997). Inclusion and the law: A principals proactive approach. The Clearing House
Jorgensen, C., Schuh, M., & Nisbet, J. (2005). The inclusion facilitator's guide. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
External links
Kids Together, Inc. an all-volunteer non-profit 501(c)3 that promotes inclusive communities where all people belongs.
Alliance for Inclusive Education web-site An autistic disagrees that inclusive education is the solution Milieu.it Rivista di Culture dell'Inclusione
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_school" Categories: Disability | Educational environment | Educational philosophy | Educational psychology | Education reform | Popular education | School types | Critical pedagogy Hidden categories: All articles with unsourced statements | Articles with unsourced statements from March 2007 | Articles lacking sources from March 2007 | All articles lacking sources
This page was last modified on 28 July 2009 at 20:22. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a nonprofit organization. Privacy