Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Std. Error
Constant)
1.826
.235
.120
.032
.158
C3-Service innovation x3
Sig.
7.771
.000
.195
3.722
.000
.043
.212
3.673
.000
-.074
.034
-.100
-2.168
.030
.089
.032
.114
2.804
.005
.025
.029
.035
.860
.390
.005
.015
.011
.325
.745
.014
.028
.020
.509
.611
-.024
.031
-.033
-.773
.440
.010
.029
.014
.346
.729
.005
.031
.007
.168
.866
-.025
.031
-.035
-.817
.414
-.020
.029
-.028
-.684
.494
-.027
.027
-.038
-.971
.332
H14-Feedback x14
-.006
.031
-.009
-.202
.840
-.022
.029
-.031
-.763
.446
.025
.031
.032
.817
.414
-.002
.031
-.003
-.066
.947
-.016
.032
-.020
-.482
.630
.008
.029
.011
.282
.778
.013
.033
.019
.391
.696
Continued..
Independent variables
Std. Error
Sig.
.049
.036
.057
1.357
.175
.086
.037
.098
2.338
.020
.044
.033
.053
1.336
.182
.015
.032
.019
.469
.639
-.063
.030
-.084
-2.097
.036
.104
.032
.136
3.274
.001
-.052
.033
-.069
-1.587
.113
-.005
.033
-.006
-.138
.890
.016
.029
.022
.560
.575
.048
.030
.065
1.592
.112
.018
.033
.023
.538
.591
.027
.032
.035
.830
.407
-.016
.030
-.021
-.529
.597
.061
.031
.082
1.998
.046
.081
.030
.112
2.718
.007
-.066
.029
-.090
-2.265
.024
.004
.031
.005
.112
.911
.031
.029
.041
1.068
.286
.042
.030
.060
1.395
.163
.022
.031
.029
.693
.488
-.066
.034
-.076
-1.983
.048
Where is the estimated banking customers behavioral intention namely attitudinal loyalty
score.
The above equation shows the impact of service quality variables such as diversity and range,
intensity and depth, service innovation, availability of most services, understanding customer
needs, technological capability, fool proof procedures and processes, visually appealing
materials and facilities, equal treatment, service transcendence and ethical conduct towards
the attitudinal loyalty of banking customers. The above equation describes that, on an average
if the diversity and range changes by one unit, there will be 0.120 unit increase in the
attitudinal loyalty, when other variables are kept constant and the similar conditions applied
for other variables also. The result of the t test reveals that the calculated significance of the
partial regression co-efficient 0.120, 0.158, (-0.074), 0.089, 0.086, (- 0.063), 0.104, 0.061,
0.081, (-0.066) and (-0.066) are valid at 1 percent level respectively. The multiple R found to
be 0.593 which reveals that there exist a relationship of 59.3 percent between the variables of
service quality dimensions and attitudinal loyalty.
The R square value of 0 .351 confirms that the explanatory variables explain only 35.1 percent
of variation in the attitudinal loyalty. The f test shows that the explained variation was highly
significant at 1 percent level. From the above co-efficient table, it has been concluded that the
variables of service quality aspects namely intensity and depth, diversity and range, fool proof
procedures and processes, availability of most services and understanding customer needs were
the dominant variables that increase the attitudinal loyalty of bank at present as well as in
future .