Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Objectives: At the end of this learning outcome, participants are expected to perform the following: a. Discuss the types and purpose of conducting review of the delivery of training session; b. Factors to consider in the review of the delivery of training session c. Use evaluation instruments/tools in the review of training delivery ; d. Analyze and interpret data gathered Content: a. b. c. d. Types and Purpose of Reviewing Delivery of training session Factors to consider in the review of the delivery of training session Selection of Evaluation Tools and Raters Evaluation Instruments
in the evaluation of their own performance. Evaluation results may also be of interest to educators from other institutions. The next step in designing an evaluation strategy for a curriculum is to identify whether the evaluation is used to measure the performance of individuals, the performance of the entire program, or both. The evaluation of an individual usually involves determining whether the person has achieved the objectives of a curriculum. On the other hand, program evaluation usually assesses the aggregate achievements of all individuals, clinical or other outcomes, actual processes of a curriculum implementation and perceptions of learners and faculty. Another use of an evaluation might be for formative purposes (to improve performance), summative purposes (to judge performance), or for both. The long-term goal underlying revision of the curriculum is to produce better physicians with qualities such as extensive and appropriate knowledge, humanism, compassion, career achievement, the ability and desire to learn throughout life, and receptiveness to patients' care and clinical research. In that situation, the proper time of evaluation is graduation or later. Whatever the purpose and whenever performed, such assessments will have a powerful effect on what students learn and how they go about their studies, and the assessment of clinical competence is one of the most important tasks. Therefore, the assessment should be regularly incorporated within the coursework to provide ongoing feedback to students and teachers which usually is undertaken at the end of a clinical course to certify a level of achievement.
require the proper selection of measurement methods and instruments. Because all measurement instruments are subject to threats to their reliability and validity, the ideal evaluation strategy will employ multiple approaches that include several different measurement methods and several different raters. When all results are similar, the findings are robust, and one can be reasonably comfortable about their validity.
Instruction: Please evaluate the trainer using the scale below. Encircle your rating. Scale 5 Descriptive Rating Outstanding Qualitative Description The performance almost always exceeds the job requirements The trainer is an exceptional rule model The performance meets and often exceeds the job requirements The performance meets the job requirements The performance needs some development to meet job requirements The faculty fails to meet job requirements
4 Very satisfactory 3 Satisfactory 2 Fair 1 Poor A. Commitment 1. Demonstrates sensitivity to trainees ability to attend and absorb content Information. 2. Integrates sensitively his/her learning objectives with those of the trainees in a Collaborative process 3. Makes self available to trainees beyond official time 4. Regularly come class on time, well-groomed and well-prepared to complete assigned responsibility, demonstrate good housekeeping and care of nature and protection of the enviroment 5. Keeps accurate records of trainees performance and prompt submission of the same. Total Score B. Knowledge of Subject 1. Demonstrate mastery of the subject matter (explain the subject matter without relying solely on the prescribed textbook) 2. Draws and share information on the state on the art of theory and practice in his/ Her discipline. 3. Integrates subjects to practical circumstances & learning intents/purposes of trainees. 4. Explains the relevance of present topics to the previous lessons and relates the subject Matter to relevant current issues and/ or daily life activities. 5. Demonstrate up-to-date knowledge and/ or awareness on current trends and issues of the subject. Total Score C. Teaching for Independent learning 1. Creates teaching strategies that allow trainees to practice using concepts they Need to understand (interactive discussion) 2. Enhances students self-esteem and/ or gives due recognition to trainees Performance/potentials. 3. Allows trainees to create their own course with objectives and realistically defined Student-professor rules and make them accountable for their performance. 4. Allows the trainees to think indecently and make their own decision and holding them Accountable for their performance based largely on their success in executing decisions. 5. Demonstrate up-to-date knowledge and/or awareness on current trends and issues of the subject.
Total Score D. Management of Learning 1. Creates opportunities for intensive and/or extensive contribution of trainees in the Class activities (e.g. breaks class into dyads, triads or buzz/task. 2. Assumes rules as facilitator, resource person, coach, inquisitor, integrator, referee in drawing trainees to contribute to knowledge and understand the concepts at hands. 3. Designs and implements learning conditions and experience that promotes healthy Exchange and/or confrontations. 4. Structures/re- structures learning and teaching-learning context to enhance attainment Of collective learning objectives. 5. Use of instructional materials (audio/video materials: fieldtrips, film-showing, computer aided instruction and etc. to reinforces learning processes. Total Score
Scale 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1
__________________________________ School/Center
1. In uniform and/or appropriate attire for a particular activity/PPE 2. Poise and self confidence 3. Freedom from destruction and conformity to the rules and regulation of the School/Center 4. Communicative skills 5. Creativity and innovativeness Organization, Presentation & Techniques (25pts)
1. Use of appropriate techniques/methods 2. Organization and clarity of the topic/subject 3. Use of appropriate print and non-print learning materials 4. Management of time 5. Accomplishment of objectives Workshop Environment (25pts) 1. Propoerly maintained workshop 2. Safety precations as well as signages are installed 3. 5 S in the souroubnding and vicinity of the workshop Trainees (25pts) 1. With interest and enthusiasm 2. Positive values observed 3. Teamwork is evident 4. Participative trainees 5. With independent thinking TOTAL POINTS
(100 pts) 8
Strong Points: _________________________________________________________________________________ Suggestions for Improvement: __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Concurred: _____________________ Instructor/Trainer _____________________ Supervisor
Data Analysis and Interpretation Teaching Effectiveness Rating Period: __________ Name of Trainer Rating by Rater Peer Trainee Supervisor
Qualification
Self
Total
Rank
Percentage Weight Self Peer Student/Trainee Supervisor/VIS Total 20% 20% 30% 30% 100%
Interpretation 95-99 - Oustanding 85-94 Very Satisfactory 80-84 Satisfactory 75-79 Poor
10