Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; And the
Unlocked Wisdom weak things to shame the strong.{1Cor 1:27}
The house that Sin built
This society is built on corruption. Without biblical truth, what we would have for our moral understanding would be
nothing short of primate. Many people argue that the ten commandments, or parts there of, have existed before the
writings of Moses. But, in actual fact the most important difference between Yahweh’s law and that of men is that His have
to do with what constitutes goodness while ours does not. No other law in the history of creation holds such a claim for
eternal authority. This is why Yahweh’s law is true, and why it is the only perfect one.
The western world is built on top of Greek, Roman, Egyptian, Babylonian and Persian customs (in a nut shell). The
majority of our philosophies have come from ancient Greece and Rome. Things like the eternal soul, hell, evolution and
salvation through works have all come from these times.
I will do an expose on many of the important men who have made up our core modern sociophilosophical belief system. I
will show you that the world is corrupted because of the men who have fancifully made theories that reject God’s
sovereignty. I will also prove that these great men were nothing more than men of open sin.
Plato
Greece (est. 427 BC– 348 BC)
Plato was a pedophilic homosexual advocate, whose flawed sciences became the
modern basis for many occult pagan philosophies. His many ideas about what was, and
what is, are the foundations for many peoples views on how they see life itself. His blind
belief in his own pride created many errors that caused many to err in regards to true
faith. The academic establishment pushes plutonian logic on naive students to the point
of regurgitation. His philosophical outlook is the root of the New age movement. Also
modern advances in witchcraft / luciferi*nism are shaped by his works. This man
abhorred the idea of family, and his works created the basis for communism and the
insipid aristocracy.
Proof of his Homosexuality
Contrary to our Almighty God’s desires, plato advocates homosexuality as a thing that’s preserved for the educated or
superior, lets say those who are in the know. Calling all non homosexual accepting people barbarians (even though other
greeks did not advocate it), he then goes on to say that these groups are somehow lacking in powerful friendship or
passionate love (within the confines of same gender friendship) which is simply wrong to presume. His ideas try to ratify
that which is abnormal by making those who partake in such practices seem better educated. This same outlook is held
today, this is the same tactic that the world is using to make sin openly acceptable to all. Plato says:
“Homosexuality is regarded as shameful by barbarians and by those who live under despotic governments
just as philosophy is regarded as shameful by them, because it is apparently not in the interest of such rulers
to have great ideas engendered in their subjects, or powerful friendships or passionate loveall of which
homosexuality is particularly apt to produce.”
He also said “Love is a serious mental disease.” In opposition, Christ teaches that "God is love" (1 john 4:16).
Plato, in the Symposium, argues for an army to be comprised of samesex lovers. We see how his mind works, when he
thinks he is correct he goes all the way with it. Us modern people see that Plato lived in open sin.
Flawed take on eternal life
In this conversation we see that plato disregards the actual understanding about the human soul. We see how he uses
reason based on a flawed assumption to create his own basis, finishing by making this flawed reasoning his version of
‘correct’ reality:
Flawed take on eternal life
In this conversation we see that plato disregards the actual understanding about the human soul. We see how he uses
reason based on a flawed assumption to create his own basis, finishing by making this flawed reasoning his version of
‘correct’ reality:
“Cebes offers a more difficult objection: what if the body is like a garment worn by the soul? Even though I continue to
exist longer than any single article of my clothing does, there will come a time when I die, and some of my clothes will
probably continue to exist. In the same way, even if the argument from opposites has shown that the soul can in principle
outlast the life of any particular human body, there might come a time when the soul itself ceases to exist." Even if there is
life after death, Cebes suggests, that the soul may not be truly immortal. Biblically this is the correct argument.
In response to this criticism, Plato significantly revises the argument from opposities by incorporating an additional
concept of the role of the Forms. "Each Form, he now maintains, is the cause of all of every particular instance that bears
its name: the form of Beauty causes the beauty of any beautiful thing; the form of Equality causes the equality of any pair
of equal things; etc. But then, since the soul is living, it must participate in the Form of Life, and thus it cannot ever die.
(Phaedo 105d) The soul is perfectly and certainly imperishable, not only for this life, but forever. ”
(http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/2f.htm)
This idea of an eternal soul became the foundation for the eternal hell. Plato’s idea of forms also dictates that what’s
above is also beneath. A lot of his ideas were fashioned into real world social systems. This man has single handedly helped
lead a revolution against Gods truth via his educational abominable ignorance. Modern people rather choose his ignorant
blind stance to that of Gods spoken Word. Believing in such lies was/is just the first step to national or worldly corruption.
Against Traditional Family
This next excerpt shows that plato desired to destroy the small family and make us into one large family based on a
hierarchical system. God made a father and mother and children, while Plato made the society to fulfill these roles and
functions:
“The best city is described as if its unity makes it a large family. The city is the family writ large. Is the family the soul writ
large? It is surely the case that in the Republic the constituent parts of the city are individual artisans or classes of artisans,
not families. The city can be the soul writ large because the souls of the just city have been liberated from the confines of
the family. Finding the soul in the expanse of the city require that the soul break the narrow bounds of the
family.” (Education and the Family in Plato’s Republic Christopher A. Colmo:
http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/8/6/6/0/pages86601/p866011.php)
So we see that Plato was living quite sinfully. His assumptions have been proven unacceptable, and his philosophy is that
of evil, (this fruit deems the tree grotesque). He is one reason why our modern day society is corrupted.
Darwin
Many people know Darwin for his fanciful tales of bacteria becoming humanity. But
many don’t know about his history with religion. It is plain to see that many of these
men who end up going against Yahwey have themselves given up on maintaining a
steadfast mind, or fail to develop a real living faith before their fall. These men are the
failures that Christ speaks about when he says “walk not as other Gentiles [who] walk,
in the vanity of their mind, Having their understanding darkened, being alienated from
the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their
heart: Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work
all uncleanness with greediness.” ( Eph 4:1719). After these men reject God they are
taken by sat*n, and from thence they do his bidding unknowingly. Darwin lived in pain
all of his life, this is due to his sinful deeds.
About his conversion
From his bio:
During these two years (i.e. October 1836 to January 1839) I was led to think much about religion. Whilst on board the
Beagle I was quite orthodox, and I remember being heartily laughed at by several of the officers (though
themselves orthodox) for quoting the Bible as an unanswerable authority on some point of morality. I
suppose it was the novelty of the argument that amused them. But I had gradually come, by this time, to see that the Old
Testament from its manifestly false history of the world, with the Tower of Babel, the rainbow as a sign, etc., etc., and from
its attributing to God the feelings of a revengeful tyrant, was no more to be trusted than the sacred books of the Hindoos,
or the beliefs of any barbarian. (Proof of the tower of babel) The question then continually rose before my mind and
would not be banished,—is it credible that if God were now to make a revelation to the Hindoos, would he permit it to be
connected with the belief in Vishnu, Siva, &c., as Christianity is connected with the Old Testament. This appeared to me
utterly incredible. (http://www.ageofthesage.org/philosophy/Charles_Darwin_quotes.html) (more on tower of babel )
So we see that he doubted Gods word, from here he falls into the world of imagination lead by his
carnal conscience fed by evil nature.
"By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which
Christianity is supported,—that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible do miracles become,—
that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us,—that the Gospels
cannot be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events,—that they differ in many important details, far too
So we see that he doubted Gods word, from here he falls into the world of imagination lead by his
carnal conscience fed by evil nature.
"By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which
Christianity is supported,—that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible do miracles become,—
that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us,—that the Gospels
cannot be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events,—that they differ in many important details, far too
important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitnesses;—by such reflections as these,
which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in
Christianity as a divine revelation. The fact that many false religions have spread over large portions of the earth like wild
fire had some weight with me. Beautiful as is the morality of the New Testament, it can hardly be denied that its perfection
depends in part on the interpretation which we now put on metaphors and allegories."
"But I was very unwilling to give up my belief;—I feel sure of this for I can well remember often and often inventing day
dreams of old letters between distinguished Romans and manuscripts being discovered at Pompeii or
elsewhere which confirmed in the most striking manner all that was written in the Gospels. (The proof he
needed) But I found it more and more difficult, with free scope given to my imagination, to invent evidence which would
suffice to convince me. Thus disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate, but was at last complete. The rate was so slow that
I felt no distress, and have never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion was correct. I can indeed
hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the text seems to show that the
men who do not believe, and this would include my Father, Brother and almost all my best friends, will be everlastingly
punished. (Darwin’s autobiography)
We see that his imagination is the same thing which allowed him to follow through with such an impossible theory.
Darwin’s theory is less realistic than a pop can building itself out of raw natural aluminum, and then coke falling from the
sky to fill it up perfectly. Evolution relies on a faith in science, while darwin didn’t even have faith in his own mind.
Notice that the lack of evidence is what detoured him from Christianity. Basically if he would have been alive when the
dead sea scrolls were found he would have believed in the scripture. What a shame.
Darwin never pretended that his theory was ‘correct’
He said “I cannot pretend to throw the least light on such abstruse problems. The mystery of the beginning of all things is
insoluble by us; and I for one must be content to remain an Agnostic.” (Meaning he still believed that God could have done
it all) Which He did
Freud
Sigmund Freud was a Jewish man who at a young age recanted God and then was blessed
with flawed knowledge. The biggest problem is that his perspectives came from
occultism and the like. His understandings dropped human morality down another peg
and post. He said that sexuality and morality are nothing more than psychological
predeterminations that help shape a mind while it grows into an adult. His perspectives
did sound good, but they have only helped people become more neurotic and proud. His
teachings are another that are crammed down the throats of the naive..
On sexuality
Psychoanalysis had a disastrous effect on the 20th century. Men undergoing therapy were told that they were
unconsciously homosexual, husbands were advised to divorce and wives were told to find lovers. But how reliable are
these socalled unconscious activities?
In the early 1960’s academics under Freud’s influence sought to change sexual morality in order to prevent, as they
thought, a breakdown in civilization. They encouraged therapeutic adultery and sex education with no deviations
excluded. Freud’s theory of the death instinct was popularized in films and plays because it was thought that the enactment
of cruelty and aggression would lead to a catharsis and to a less violent society.
His works advocate homosexuality, violence and the degradation of society as a whole.
Drug usage
It is well known that freud both used cocaine and advised its use on patients. “From 1884 to 1887 Freud wrote four papers
concerning cocaine, including a definitive review ("Über Coca") in 1884. He obviously felt comfortable in both taking
cocaine and writing about it in his letters. He mentions and discusses his use of and dreams about cocaine in the
Interpretation of Dreams (1889). The true extent and duration of his selfexperiments is not known, since access to his
correspondence has been severely restricted.”(http://www.bookrags.com/research/freudandcocaineedaa02/)
Occultism
Much of Freud’s theory about dream interpretation derived from his occult research. He also spent considerable effort
investigating the phenomena of mental telepathy and thought transference.[4] He was also a practitioner of the Tarot…
Freud was a member of the Vienna lodge of the B’nai B’rith (Sons of the Covenant)[Freemason], which he joined
in 1897. It has been written that this association comforted him greatly during his time of outcast over his theories of
Occultism
Much of Freud’s theory about dream interpretation derived from his occult research. He also spent considerable effort
investigating the phenomena of mental telepathy and thought transference.[4] He was also a practitioner of the Tarot…
Freud was a member of the Vienna lodge of the B’nai B’rith (Sons of the Covenant)[Freemason], which he joined
in 1897. It has been written that this association comforted him greatly during his time of outcast over his theories of
dream interpretation.[6] In 2004, there was even a new lodge in Paris dedicated and named after him.[7]
The ultimate achievement of Freud, may have been his introduction of the theory that Moses was connected to
Akhenaton, the Egyptian pharoah. His book Moses and Monotheism brought this idea to the wider world. The theory has
been picked up by many modern researchers (Questioning the truth of the bible). This idea is so important because
accepting its premise completely alters the understanding of biblical history and all that stems from it.
(http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=5718)
Freud is now best known for his psychoanalytical method. It has been recognized that there are similarities between
psychoanalysis and the occult doctrines of the Kabbala. They both share an emphasis on male and female elements, in a
fixation with numbers and in the exploration of a variety of symbols. Some fundamental themes can be found in the Zohar
or Book of splendour such as bisexuality, malevolent childhood impulses and dream interpretation.
Freud was also deeply interested in witchcraft and other occult phenomena. On Saturday evenings, he would frequently
play tarock a card game associated with the Kabbala. However, he appeared to have a conscious hatred of religion both
Orthodox Judaism and Christianity. In 1937, when he was urged to flee Nazism, he responded that his real enemy was the
Roman Catholic Church (He may have caught on).
Atheism
There are remarkable similarities between Karl Marx and Freud. They both held religion to be an illusion and neither
believed in the existence of a immortal soul. They both shared assumptions about man and the world which are grounded
in the philosophy of the Enlightenment. They were also completely under the influence of the theories of Charles
Darwin. Freud wrote: “Just as the body in its developmental stages shows traces of earlier phases in the evolution of
mankind, so may the unconscious be regarded as in some respects a repository of past experiences in the early mental
development of mankind.”(http://www.theotokos.org.uk/pages/churpsyc/freud.html) (I don’t advocate all sources)
Today
Freud helped usher in the idea that sin was nothing more than a innocent part of development. Things like repentance were
replaced with psychoanalysis. People began to rely on science instead of the true unchanging word of The Almighty, this
helped modern society tumble into the depths that it currently stands in.
Karl Marx
Marxism is nothing more than commercial illumination. It is widely known that the
communist manifesto was nothing more than plagiarized illuminati plans for world
domination. Splicing plutonian idealism with a self centered view, Marx planned on
making the world a better place without the laws of God as it’s moral compass. “In 1842
Karl Marx began to write revolutionary propaganda for the League of the Just, hoping to
cause a spirit of unrest. In 1844, in collaboration with Friedrich Engels, and under the
supervision of The League of the Just, Marx began to write the infamous "Manifest der
Kommunistichen Partei," commonly known today as the "The Communist Manifesto,"
which appeared at the beginning of 1848 [3]. Later, the Illuminati operating under the
name of The League of the Just, changed their name to "The League of
Communists" [4].” (http://www.benabraham.com/html/illuminati__4a.html)
Atheism and views on God
“Already in his thesis for the doctorate Marx proclaims in no uncertain terms that "in the country of reason" the existence
of God cannot have any meaning. "Take paper money to a country in which this use of paper money is not known, and
everyone will laugh at your subjective representation. Go with your gods to a country in which other gods are worshipped,
and you will be shown that you are the victim of fancies and abstractions. And rightly. Anyone who had brought a migrant
god to the ancient Greeks, would have found the proof of the nonexistence of this god, because it did not exist for the
Greeks. What is the case in a certain country for certain foreign gods, takes place for god in general in the country of
reason: it is an area in which his existence ceases" (K. Marx, Frammento dell’appendice della dissertazione dottorale, in A.
Sabetti, Sulla fondazione del materialismo storico, Florence 1962, p. 415).
He believes in absolute humanism and his outlooks come directly from the illuminati and people against The Almighty.
Absolute humanism, which sets man at the summit of the cosmos: man as the supreme being. This is new age occultism
which stems from sat*ns first promised lie. If we combine communism “peoples republic of china” with new age occultism
“man as god” we would have his world view in a nutshell.
Marxism with its aggressive commitment to atheism and scientific materialism, scorns all religion as “the opium of the
people.” (ironic)
A Marxist pamphlet written before 1917 and later reissued by the Soviet government bluntly declared that man is destined
which stems from sat*ns first promised lie. If we combine communism “peoples republic of china” with new age occultism
“man as god” we would have his world view in a nutshell.
Marxism with its aggressive commitment to atheism and scientific materialism, scorns all religion as “the opium of the
people.” (ironic)
A Marxist pamphlet written before 1917 and later reissued by the Soviet government bluntly declared that man is destined
to “take possession of the universe and extend his species into distant cosmic regions, taking over the whole solar system.
Human beings will be immortal.” Anatoly Lunacharsky, the first Commissar of Enlightenment in the new Soviet state,
believed that as religious conviction had been a great force of change in history, Marxists should conceive the
struggle to transform nature through labor as their form of devotion, and the spirit of collective
humanity as their god. (http://www.gnostics.com/newdawn1.html)
Do we see how all of these men either replace The All Mighty Yahweh and King Yahshua with their own conceited pride? or
use mans forced mass ambition as a way to strive for eternal reward? Its all sat*nism in the end. And these men are what
the hinge of the world turns upon.
Nietzsche
Fred Nietzsche was raised as a Lutheran. After a combination of bad events in his life he
turned against God, then claimed He didn’t exist. He like most of the others became
atheist and even proclaimed himself to be the antiChrist. Such ideas like morality as
being unnatural, the bible as being false, and God as being non existent (which is
fanatical) were the corner stones of his teachings. This man ended his life in insanity
because he was cursed dumb for having such a blasphemous mouth. Many follow his idea
of the super man, and this is what help fuel the Nazi regime. His evil ideas are the same
that support many modern atheists alike. His story is also one of weak faith followed by
failure. Yet another shame.
Great source (http://www.handprint.com/SC/NIE/GotDamer.html)
Conclusion
All of these “great minds” were against God. They all attained fame, but were all used by the sat*nic agenda. If you are a
university student, know that the entire world of academia runs on these liars words. Every one of these men will be
accountable for the lives that they have help ruin. Many students are turned away from the truth of God because they are
forced to believe in this indoctrination of sinfulness. On judgment day they will stand in their rotten bodies claiming that it
was their minds and not themselves that set them against the face of He who is All Holy. Our modern society is built on
corruption because every big idea comes from a lie that started from the very beginning, and carried through the ages.
Stay sober, read truth, and understand that the meek shall inherit the earth.
In Christ’s love,
Blessings
This entry was posted on Thursday, April 9th, 2009 at 1:45 pmand is filed under Truth. You can follow any responses to this entry
through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response , or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
Submit Comment
Submit Comment
Pages Archives
l A. Rivera April 2009 l May 2009
l CatholXism S S M T W T F l April 2009
l Hell l March 2009
l His Name 1 2 3 l February 2009
l Rabbit Holes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
l Sources 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
search Go
« Mar May »