Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
7
A
NOV 2 9 1963
ACCESSION NO _
FORMERLY
Acces/'on i t
. Fil^# _ . .
PO REGISTR
.VcMs.#.
;___
U. S. ARMY TRANSPORTATION
, IN THE
CALL
N U M B E R
T I T L E
AZ
C 2
United States Army Transportation in the Southwest Pacific Area 1941 - 1947 Property of Office of the Chief ICE O F OR IG IN
* Military Kistc
ral Roferenc
Transportation Unit, Historical Division
Spedial Staff, United States Army
OFF
X RETORW TjTJ)OK
OCSFOJH
1
SEP
1C564 B15T
50
e
0002275
U. S. ARMY TRANSPORTATION
IN THE
1941-1947
REGRADEO
BY AUTHORITY
OCTOBER 1949
Foreword
The preparation of this monograph, MU. S. Army Transportation in
the Southwest Pacific Area, 1941 - 1947," was undertaken with a dual
purpose. First, it was desired to present in some detail the complex
and often obscure story of Army transportation in this important thea ter, for the use of the Transportation Corps in planning future oper ations, procurement, and training, and for the general information of
the military authorities* Second, it was expected that the monograph
would serve as the basis for a chapter to appear in a volume on trans portation in the oversea commands, which will be published as part of
the series, "U. S. Army in World War II."
The author of the monograph, Dr. James H. Masters on, wisely has
not limited himself to a study of transportation operations, but has
dealt at some length with the vicissitudes of the transportation organ ization in the theater and its relationships with the various echelons
of military command. Failure to give the transportation organization
proper form and adequate authority was a basic weakness, and added con siderably to the theater's transportation difficulties, which would have
been great under any circumstances.
Dr. Masterson spent approximately 21 months in research and writing.
Neither aspect of the work was completed to his satisfaction, due to his
acceptance of another position, which necessitated cutting short the re search and organizing the material and preparing the text under pressure.
The manuscript represents, nevertheless, a very substantial accomplishment,
Chester Wardlow
Chief, Transportation Unit
Historical Division
Special Staff, U.S. Army
Contents
Introduction
I, Higher Commands as Belated to Transportation The United States Forces in the Far East (USAFEB) First
Period, 26 July 1941 - 18 April 1942 Task Force - South Pacific, 12-22 December 1941 . . . The United States Forces in Australia (USFIA) 22 Decem ber 1941 - 5 January 1942 The American-Britisn-Dutch-Aastralian (ABDA) Command 15
January - 10 March 1942 The United States Army Forces in Australia (USAFIA) 5
January - 20 July 1942 Commands of General Douglas MacArthur, 1942-1946 . . . The U* S. Army Services of Supply (USASOS) 20 July 1942
- 7 June 1945 The U. S. Army Forces, Western Pacific (AEVESPAC) 7
June 1945 - 31 December 1946 Notes II. Local Commands as Belated to Transportation . Base Headquarters and Headquarters Belated Thereto . Bases in New Guinea Bases in the Philippines The Base in the Hyukyus Port Headquarters Port Detachments and Major Port Headquarters . . .
Utilized as Base Headquarters Port Commands and Medium Ports Notes III. The Transportation Office Periods in the History of the Transportation Office . . 1
1
4
5
10
13
31
39
44
47
56
61
81
92
98
100
100
110
122
130
132
132
U l
144
146
149
152 157
158
163
164
1 7 1
1 8 2
17.
Divisions of the Transportation Office The Water Division The Supply Division The Fiscal Division Notes
188
189
207
227
236
242
243
264
267
270
282
289
293
V. Transpacific Shipping Some General Aspects of Pacific Shipping Requisitioning on the United States . . . . . Shipping Information Loading and Unloading Packaging and Marking ;' Selection of Military Cargoes for Return to the
United States . Personnel Movements to and from the Southwest Pacific
Area . .
ii
294
299
301
307
317
319
338
353
368
370
372
376
380
383
394
394
402
407
412
416
421
434
429
430
433
451
459
460
iii
Notes
IX. The Handling of Cargo
Port Equipment . . . . Cargo-Handling Personnel Military personnel Civilian Port Labor Pilferage Volume of Army Cargo Handled . . . . . . . Notes X, Marine Bepair, Conversion, and Assembly 475
478
480
497
506
514
517
523
kepair 526
Supply of Marine Spare Parts 547
Assembly of Knockdown and Sectionallsed Craft . . . . 556
Conversion . . 570
Hot os XI, Inter!eland Water Transport Directions of Interisland Traffic Interisland Tows . . . . . . . Military Crews Civilian Maritime Personnel Navy Manning of A m y Vessels < ^ . Notes XII, Bail Transport Bail Operations in Australia Bail Operations in the Philippines Notes XIII. Motor Transport Highway Operations in Australia ^ .
#
. . . . 576
584
584
. 601
613
619
636
648
656
656
670
682
687
687
iv
Motor Transport Command No. 1 . Highway Operations in Luzon Motor Operations in Bases Notes
694
699
708
716
721
729
7 3 8
7 4 3
7 4 7
809
Appendices
Number
1. Organ!zational Chart, Office of Transportation Officer, USASOS, 1
March 1943
2. Organization of Transportation Corps, USASOS, October 1943
3* Organisational Chart, Office of Chief Transportation Officer, USASOS,
February 1944
4. Organizational Chart, Office of Chief Transportation Officer, USASOS,
June 1944
5. Organizational Chart, Transportation Corps, USASOS, December 1944
6. Organizational Chart, Transportation Service, United States Army
Forces, Western Pacific, July 1945
7. Organizational Chart, Office of the Chief of Transportation, A3WESPAC,
October 1945
8. Organizational Chart, Office of the Chief Transportation Officer,
AIWESPAC, 1 December 1945
9. Organizational Chart, Office of the Chief of Transportation, AFWESPAC,
1 February 1946
10. Organizational Chart, Office of the Chief of Transportation, ASVESPAO,
15 June 1946
11. Organizational Chart, Office of the Chief of Transportation, AFWESPAC,
October 1946
12. Organizational Chart, Office of the Chief of Transportation, AJWESPAC,
5 December 1946
13* Port Commanders in the Southwest Pacific Area
14. Strength of the Transportation Office in Headquarters, USAPIA, USASOS,
and AJWESPAC, January 1942 - December 1946
15. Organization, Office of the Chief Transportation Officer, USASOS, 2
At 1 9 4 4
16* Distribution of Transportation Corps Personnel In SWPA, January 1942
- December 1946
17.
18. Deadweight Tonnage of Vessels (of 1000 Gross Tons or More) under
U. S. Army Control in the Atlantic Area (Including the Caribbean)
and the Pacific Area (Including Alaska), November 1941 - December
1946
19. Proportion of Troop and Cargo Vessels of 1000 Gross Tons and More
in TJ. S. Army Service Operating in and for SWPA, June 1944 - De cember 1946
20. Volume of U. S. Army Traffic between the United States and the
Southwest Pacific Area, December 1941 - December 1946
21. Composition of Cargo Dispatched by the U. S. Army from the United
States to the Southwest Pacific Area (Measurement Tons), Aoril
1942 - December 1946
the United States to Various
Area (Measurement Tons), June
Various Destinations in the
- December 1944
22.
Cargo Dispatched by the U. S. Army from Destinations in the Southwest Pacific 1943 - February 1945
23. Ships, Cargo, and Personnel Arriving at Southwest Pacific Area, November 1943 24.
25.
3X
32. Small Craft and other Floating Equipment Ordered by the U. S. Army
from Australian Construction, Delivered, and on Hand Bovember
1942 - January 1946
33. Small Craft on Hand and on Order for use of the Transportation Corps
In the Southwest Pacific Area, 30 June 1943
34. Ships and Craft Operated by the Transportation Corps in the South west Pacific Area, 22 January 1944
35. Bomber of Harbor Boats from the United States in U. S. Army Service
in the Southwest Pacific Area on the first day of each month
January - August 1945
36* Status of TC Floating Equipment for the Southwest Pacific Area, 30
April 1945
37. Delivery of Small Boats Procured by the Office of the Chief of Trans portation, ASF, and Dispatched to the Southwest Pacific Area for
Transportation Corps Use, January 1944 - August 1945
38. Harbor Craft Constructed by the Transportation Corps in the United
States and Delivered to the Southwest Pacific Area, 1943-1945
39. Number of Vessels in the Southwest Pacific Area Reported as Reten tions
40. Lighterage Equipment, Port of Manila, March 1945 - January 1946
41* Port Units of the U. S. Army In the Southwest Pacific Area, 1942-1946
42* U. S. Army Cargo Loaded and Discharged by Australian Ports, February
1944 - November 1946
43. U, S. Army Cargo Loaded and Discharged by Hew Guinea Ports, January
1944 - April 1946
44. U. S. Army Cargo Loaded and Discharged by Philippine and Okinawan
Ports, December 1944 - May 1947
45. Total U. S. Army Cargo Loaded and Discharged in Ports of the South west Pacific Area, February 1944 - April 1946
46. Rank of Southwest Pacific Ports in Total Volume of U. S. Army Cargo
Handled, February 1944 - June 1946
47.
48. Allocation of AIWESPAC-Control led Oceangoing vessels in the South west Pacific Area, July 1945 - September 1946
49. Bomber of Civilian Maritime Personnel Employed lay the U. S. Army
in the Southwest Pacific Area, June 1945 - December 1946
50. Equipment and mileage of Australian Railways, g. January 1943
51. T7 S. Army Cargo and Personnel Moved on Australian ber 1942 - October 1946
52. U. S. Army Cargo and Personnel Moved on Australian ber 1942 - March 1946
53. 17, S, Army Cargo and Personnel Booked in Australia Corps Officers for Movement by Air, October 1942 Railways, Octo Highways, Octo by Transportation
- November 1946
INTRODUCTION
This study degas with the personnel, equipment, supplies, and oper ations within the Southwest Pacific Area that were of primary interest
to the Chief of Transportation, Headquarters, Army Service Forces, as
distinguished from other chiefs of service in Washington. In the South
body of this study, preceded by chapters on the structure and relation ships of the Transportation Corps in the theater and followed by a chap ter on the system of regulating traffic throughout the theater.
It must be constantly remembered, however, that plans and operations
of the Transportation Corps were strongly influenced, and its mission was
repeatedly revised, by the differing requirements of successive campaigns,
To show this influence the main events of the war. though well known,
must be recapitulated.
War involving the United States in the Pacific was believed long
before 7 December 1941 to be in prospect, and efforts were made to*
strengthen the defenses of the Philippine Islands. On 7 December 1941
Japan precipitated war by attacking Pearl Harbor. The Japanese comple ted the conquest of Hong Kong on 25 December 1941, of Malaya on 15
February 1942, and of the Netherlands East Indies on 9 March 1942; on
29 January they attacked Bougainville Island; on 8 March 1942 they in vaded New Guinea at Lae and Salamaua; and on 6 May 1942 they received
at Corregidor the surrender of the remnants of the U. S. Army in the
Philippines. They bombed Darwin, Australia, on 19 February 1942 and
often thereafter, and were expected to land on the mainland of Australia,
This expectation was reduced when their naval advance was stopped by the
Battle of the Coral Sea, 7-11 May 1942, and further reduced when their
landing at Milne Bay, at the east end of New Guinea, was dispersed in
August 1942 and when their march across New Guirea was checked thirty-
two miles (or less) from Port Moresby on 14 September 1942. They were
defeated in the islands northeast of Australia by campaigns lasting
from 7 August 1942 to 26 November 1944, and were driven from the ports
on the north coast of New Guinea in "leapfrog" operations moving north west from the Buna-Sona region to Sansapor, 19 November 1942 - 30 July
1944. They were conquered in the Philippines and Okinawa in campaigns
beginning with the landing at Leyte, 20 October 1944, and ending with
V-J Day, 2 September 1945. The occupation of Japan and Kor kept the
ii
889954 O 5 0 2
**>*
and supplies that were needed there and for which shipping was available.
This process of "rolling up the rear" included not only Australia and
New Guinea but to some extent the South Pacific Area, where hostilities
virtually ended late in 1944, permitting the transfer of personnel, e quipment, and supplies to the Philippine Islands. Withdrawal from lew
Guinea was completed on 30 April 1946 and from Australia on 30 November
1946.
(?) Preparations were made for launching an invasion of Japan
from the Philippine Islands. Much of the personnel, equipment, and
supplies accumulated for this purpose became surplus on V-J Day, but
the rest was required for the occupation of Japan and Korea. The
the main supply operations of the war; practically all the personnel,
equipment, and supplies delivered to the Philippines was either captured
or destroyed. The chief logistical result of efforts to reinforce the
Philippines and the Netherlands East Indies from Australia was to ie velop Australia as a base for later supply operations in the conquest
of New Guinea. At the end of the war the occupation of Japan and Korea
and the activities of the Army in the civilian relief of the Netherlands
East Indies and China were processes growing out of the war but not
part of it, forming a stage that has not ended ?n(L cannot be seen in
perspective.
iv
The substance of this study, therefore, is the structure and opera tions of the (Transportation Corps in the Southwest Pacific Area from the
arrival of the first U. S. troops in .Australia, 22 December 1941, to the
withdrawal of the Army from Australia and N.ew Guinea and the redesigna tion on 1 January 1947 of the U. S. Army Forces, Western Pacific, as the
Philippines-Byukyus Command. Phases of the war not directly relevant
to the build-up, operations, and demobilization of the Transportation
Corps in Australia, Hew Guinea, the Philippines, and Okinawa are presen ted only as they exhibit some connection with, this main theme.
To express the unity of the theme certain anachronisms of terminol ogy are convenient, (l) The Transportation Service of the IT. S. Army
north of the equator, as well as Australia, Hew Guinea, and the Nether lands East Indies, south of the equator; and in effect it was redesigna ted as the Western Pacific on 7 June 1945 when the U. S. Army Service
of Supply, Southwest Pacific Area, was redesignated as the U. S. Army
Forces, Western Pacific. The latter organization eventually included
"by Pacific Ocean Areas) and became responsible for movements to and from
Japan and Korea (but not for installations within these areas). The
term Southwest Pacific Area has continued, however, in common use, and
no reason is apparent for confining it in this study either to the area
south of the equator or to the period when the Southwest Pacific Area
command existed, (3) The office of the chief transportation officer
in the headquarters of the IT. S. Army services of supply in the South west Pacific Area underwent repeated changes of name, which disguise
the fact that it remained substantially the same office* To avoid con fusion the office is referred to, without initial capitals, as the trans portation office, services of supply*
Several characteristics of the Southwest Pacific Area, either as a
geographical area or as a pyramid of military organizations, affected
the technical services and particularly the Transportation Corps:
(1) Distances were enormous. San Francisco, the main port of embar kation supplying the Southwest Pacific, is 6,193 miles from Brisbane,
5,800 from Milne Bay, 6,299 from Manila* Sydney is 515 miles from Bris bane, 2,200 from Finschhafen, and (by rail) 2,224 from Fremantle, Western
Australia. Finschhafen is 2,010 miles from Manila* Ships required a
longer time to sail from the United States to the theater and back than
to any other theater except China-Burma-India and the Persian Gulf, and
had to make longer voyages between main ports in the theater than in any
other. The lag between requisition and delivery and between the formula tion and execution of a supply plan was so long that supply policy was
not quickly adjustable to tactical changes.
(2) As in the other Pacific areas, nearly all military operations
vii
Australia was slow and uncooperative, and by application to the Common wealth Government was able to prevent the U. S. Army from employing on
the mainland of Australia any great number of service troops or of
Javanese, Burmese, and Chinese laborers. The best manpower of Australia,
a continent of about seven million inhabitants, was in military service.
The natives of New Guinea served willingly at tasks within their capaci ty but were too few and too uncivilized to be of great assistance to
the Army. Filipino labor was the best in the theater but far from en tirely satisfactory. Army service troops were therefore required in
large numbers in New Guinea and the Philippines, and subsistence and
other supplies for these troops were added to the burden on transporta tion.
(5) The climate of the whole theater except central and southern
Australia was hot and damp. Metals rusted; wood and cloth rotted, molded,
and were devoured by vermin; foods and medicines were quickly contami nated; and the most scrupulous care in packaging and protecting equipment
and supplies did not eliminate heavy loss, requiring repaid and replace ment. Malaria, dysentery, and other tropical diseases, as well as the
enervating effect of damp heat, reduced the efficiency of service troops,
especially in New Guinea, and swelled the number of patients requiring
transportation to other climates. Torrential rains made roads impassable,
washed bridges away, undermined railroad tracks, flooded supply dumps,
grounded planes, and halted port operations. Typhoons damaged shore
installations and destroyed shipping.
(6) The change of direction in Australian supply from the Nether lands Bast Indies and the Philippines to New Guinea, and the transfer of
viii
supply activity from Australia to New Guinea and thence to the Philippines,
under changing tactical requirements that emphasized first one and then
another type of operation, was accompanied " b y a kaleidoscopic profusion
of administrative reorganizations and redesignations. Functions were
transferred to and from offices, combined in one office and redistribut ed among several, both in headquarters and in the bases, to such an
extent that only a bare outline of the administrative system can be re tained by an ordinary memory.
(7) Land, water, and air forces of the United States, the United
Kingdom, the Commonwealth of Australia, and to some extent the Netherlands
Bast Indies were all engaged in transport operations. Each operating
force differed in organization and methods from every other; all competed
for the limited supplies of equipment and fuel. General Headquarters,
Southwest Pacific Area, had authority over the combat operations of all
the Allied forces but not over the supply operations. The only agency
with authority over supply operations of every force was the Combined
Chiefs of Staff. These operations ran in at least a dozen parallel
Efforts, not entirely successful, were made to
channels of command.
ix
The basic limitation was one of time. With so broad and intricate
a subject, and with sources of information so widely scattered, at least
another year would have been required to exhaust the available materials.
In such a quest for information, the point is reached sooner or later
where diminishing returns render further inquiry uneconomical. In this
study that point had not been reached when it became necessary to discon tinue research. The meager time available for writing meant that only a
hasty revision could be given to the first draft with a view to making it more readable.
The five main sources of information used in the preparation of th$B
study are outlined below. Further detail regarding certain of them will
be found in the "Note on Sources" which is appended.
(1) Records of the Historical Branch, Office of the Chief of
Transportation, Army Service Forces, consisting mainly of (a) a historical
record of the Transportation Corps in the SoutHwest Pacific Area, compiled
in the theater and forwarded in installments between 194-3 and 1947; (b) "office
files" of the Chief of Transportation, ASF (Maj. Gen. C. P. Gross), the
Assistant Chief of Transportation for Operations (Brig. Gen. Robt. H. Wylie),
and a few other officers; and (c) a file arranged by subject, containing
copies of documents from other files (transcribed by the Historical Branch
end still being added to), a considerable proportion of signed originals,
and printed or processed manuals, reports, and other compilations. Prac tically everything useful for the present purpose is believed to have been
extracted from these files.
(2) The main decimal file of the Office of the Chief of Trans portation, ASF, divided at present into a classified file and a "clear"
file. In both the compiler has examined all records filed under the break down or "cutoff" labeled "Southwest Pacific Area," as well as various records
filed under other classifications.
(3) Records originating in Headquarters, Army Se^ -Ice Forces,
particularly in the Planning Division, formerly filed in va. s offices
of ASF but now consolidated in part by the Historical Records ^jction, AGO.
(4-) Records in the custody of the Historical Division, Special
Staff, U. S. Army, chiefly: (a) a report on the organization and operations
'
xi
xii
use infirm and fragmentary statistics, with proper warning of what they are,
than not to use statistics at ell.
The first two chapters that follow deal mainly with matters which,
strictly speaking, do not belong in this study. These matters are included
because they are essential to en understanding of the activities of the
Transportation Corps and are not known to be treated elsewhere in co ordinated form. The compiler, being unable to understand the work of the
monograph should have been prepared in the early stages of- the World War II
historical program to provide a proper basis and background for specialized
studies, such as trhe present one, dealing with single services.
x i n
CHAPQ3EH I
a given time could "be represented logically, but the sequence of changes
in the system can be more easily understood if described in roughly chrono logical order. This presentation requires an account of eight commands,
the Philippine Army called into the service of the United States for the
duration of the emergency, and any additional forces that might be assigned.
On 27 July 1941 General Douglas MacArthur was recalled to active duty and
o
was designated Commanding General, U5AFFE.
Plans were made in Washington and Manila to move troops, equipment,
- 1
military cargo from the United States for the Philippines in July 1941,
19,946 tons in August, ,26,905 tons in September, 26,938 tons in October,
and 87,572 tons in November. Six vessels arrived from the United States
petroleum products from the Netherlands East Indies and other points out side the United States, and stocks of oil and gasoline were accumulated in
the Philippines. Arrangements had been made by 8 October 1941 for shipping
gasoline from both Manila and San Francisco to Darwin, Rabaul, Port Moresby,
and Rockhampton to support "contemplated operations." The motor ship Don
- 2
vice in the Philippines on 7 December 1941 only one, the Mac tan, is known
to have escaped. This vessel, declared by General MacArthur as a hospital
ship under the Hague Convention on 30 December 1941, was chartered by the
Red Cross and was permitted by the Japanese to withdraw from Manila to Aus tralia with a full load of wounded soldiers, in addition to nurses, students,
and others.^ Supply operations controlled by USAtfFS in 1941 affected the
course of the war chiefly in two ways: (l) the accumulation of materiel in
the Philippines enabled the forces at Bataan and Corregidor to prolong their
resistance, and (2) certain troops and materiel en route to the Philippines
on 7 December 1941 were diverted to form the nucleus of the U. S. forces in
Australia.
In March 1942, by order of the President, General MacArthur transferred
his headquarters to Australia. He and part of his staff departed from
- 3
General Order No. 1, GH&i, Southwest Pacific Area, 18 April 1942, which
listed the TJ. S. Forces in the Philippines among the commands of the South west Pacific Area but did not mention USAFFE. The U* S. Forces in the
November 1941 when the USNT Republic sailed from San Francisco with 281
officers and 2,385 enlisted men of the U. S. Army and 18 civilians and fly ing cadets. Off Honolulu, on 29 November, the Re-public joined a convoy
destined for the Philippines, escorted by the USS Pensacola (cruiser) and
the USN Yacht Niagara, (subchaser) and consisting of the TJSNT Chaumont. the
USAT Meigs. the USAT V/illard A, HolbrooJg. the U. S. freighters Admiral Hal-
stead and Coast Farmer, and the Netherlands freighter Bloemfontein. with
the Republic as flagship. Orders were received to proceed by way of Port
Moresby, New Guinea, and not by the usual direct route to Manila.
Neveof the attack on Pearl Harbor was followed by every possible
measure to insure the safety of the convoy. On 12 December 1941, by Gen
eral Order No. 1, Task Force - South Pacific, the troops of the convoy
were constituted as "Task Force - South Pacific," of which Brig. Gen.
Julian F. Barnes, senior officer of the U. S. Army aboard the convoy,
assumed command. On the same day, by General Order No. 2, he designated a
On 13
- 4
Arthur was notified on 12 December 1941 that the troops and supplies in
the convoy were placed at his disposal, that the aircraft in the cargo would
be assembled as soon as possible after arrival, and that General Barnes was
instructed to report to him. On 17 December Maj. Gen. George H. Brett,
889954O50
- D
chose.
was considered to " b e "an Advance Section, Communications Zone for the sup port of the United States Army Forces in the Far East." He was directed to
build up in Australia and the Philippines sixty days of supplies, to pur chase supplies locally, to assume control of water transportation under
General MacArthur's direction, and to make contracts for construction with out reference to the War Department. On 20 December these instructions
were repeated with added details, and the Commanding General, USFIA, was
authorized "to do anything that may be required to get supplies, equipment,
arms, and ammunition to the United States Army Forces in the Far East." On
21 December 1941 the Joint Army-Navy Board at V/ashington agreed that General
Brett and Rear Admiral Glassford, Commander, Task Force 5, would establish
a base at Darwin in cooperation with Australian authorities and would make
every effort to establish communication between Luzon and Australia by air craft, by escorted fast ships, and by small vessels proceeding singly. 21 December General Barnes received notification of these arrangements.
He was further informed that Brig. Gen. Henry B. Clagett was ordered from
the Philippines to assist General Brett. General Barnes was instructed to
On
report for duty to either of these officers or, if neither had arrived, to
begin execution of the instructions addressed to them.''
On instructions from the War Department Col. Van S. Merle-Smith, Mili tary Attache of the United States in Australia, had made preparations to
receive the convoy at Brisbane. General Barnes and his staff went ashore
- 6
of Staff,
23 December, and the troops were quartered at Ascot and Doomben Eace Tracks,
where tents and messing arrangements were provided by the Australian Army.
Headquarters was transferred to Melbourne by Special Order No. 11, 31 Decem ber. Headquarters of the Australian Army, Navy, and Air Force, and of sev eral governmental agencies that would be concerned in supplying the Philip pines, were located in Melbourne; and the removal, effected on 3 January
1942, was intended to promote coordination of Australian and American plans.
Headquarters Detachment, USFIA, set up by General Order No. 6t 24 December,
remained in Brisbane and established the first U. S. Army base in Australia.
General Brett arrived on 1 January 1942 and assumed command of USFIA, des ignating General Barnes as Chief of Staff and General Clagett as commanding
Air Corps troops (including 48 pilots and 2 navigators) and 2,000 other
troops (including 2 regiments of light field artillery). The main items
of cargo were 55 unassembled dive bombers (A-24), about 340 motor vehicles,
6,000 drums of aviation oil and 3,000 of aviation gasoline, 3,245 bombs, 48
75-mm. guns (British model) without sights or equipment, and 3,680,600
rounds of ammunition (mainly small-arms ammunition, some artillery), besides
- 7
time loading "basis" and therefore had to " b e almost entirely unloaded to
locate the organic equipment of the air troops and some of the parts and
equipment for the planes. The trigger motors and solenoids for the guns
of the dive "bombers were never found, and substitutes were flown later from
the United States. A plant for assembling aircraft was set up. Work con tinued all day on Christmas, in the middle of the Australian summer. of the manifests were discovered to be inaccurate, and others were not
located. Parts of the cargo were handled several times. The officers con Some
cerned were having their first experience with discharging and loading ships.
In spite of these difficulties the reloading was completed on 28 Decem ber 1941. On that date the Willard A. Holbrook sailed for the Philippines
with the 148th Field Artillery (less one battalion), the 147th Field Artil lery, and their ammunition, supplies, and organic equipment, in company
with the Chaumont (carrying Navy supplies). The master of the Bloemfontein
and Headquarters Battery and the 1st Battalion, 131st Field Artillery,
sailed from Brisbane for Java on 30 December 1941. The Meig;s. the Admiral
Halstea^, and the Coast Farmer were retained by TJSFIA for coastwise operation
in Australia. The other vessels of the convoy returned to the United States.
- 8
By this time certain changes of plan had been made necessary " b y the
withdrawal of General MacArthur's troops to Bataan and Corregidor, leaving
in his possession only a small airfield on Corregidor. Airfields to the
south of Luzon were believed to be in Japanese hands, and plans for flying
short-range aircraft to Luzon were tentatively abandoned. Long-range air craft were dispatched from the United States to Australia to assist the
Philippines, and the USFIA command was expected to be "predominantly air,
with the other elements being limited to those needed for the efficient
air operations and the security of bases.M The Commanding General, USFIA,
- 9
Commander in the ABDA Area was to command such forces of the ABDA govern ments as were stationed in the area, and all forces in Australia that were
allotted by their governments for services in or supporting the ABDA Area.
He had no authority over the internal adjnlnistration of the forces under
his command but was responsible for directing and coordinating these forces,
His mission was to hold Burma and Australia as "essential supporting posi tions"; to establish a "basic defensive position" along a line including
the Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Java, and North Australia; to reestablish
communication with Luzon and to support "the Philippines' Garrison"; to
maintain essential communications within the ABDA Area; to operate sea,
land, and air forces against the Japanese as far forward as possible from
- 10
the line of defense; and "to gain general air superiority at the earliest
possible moment through the employment of concentrated air power.11 A deputy
supreme commander and, if necessary, a commander of the combined naval for ces and a commander of the combined air forces were to " b e jointly designated
by the ABDA governments. General Wavell arrived in Batavia on 10 January
war, and the assumptions on which it rested, lasted less than two months.
The Japanese completed the conquest of Malaya on 15 February. Most of the
Allied naval squadron was destroyed in the Java Sea on 27-29 February. Lack
of antiaircraft defenses led to heavy losses of Allied planes, and on 25
February the dozen heavy bombers that survived were flown to India. A Jap anese raid on Darwin, 19 February 1942, destroyed or severely damaged
almost all the ships and aircraft in the port. On 25 February the War
for Java was impossible. All U. S. troops that could be withdrawn were
returned to Australia. as missing in action. The 1st Battalion, 131st Field Artillery, was listed
Organized resistance ended with the surrender of
Bandoeng, Java, on 10 March, and Timor was evacuated by the Allied forces.
As early as 1 March it seemed possible that Australia itself could not
be successfully defended. Broome and Wyndham, on the coast of Australia
- 11
No. 1, Headquarters, USAFIA, 5 January 1942. The same order announced the
establishment of Base Sections 1 (Darwin), 2 (Townsville), 3 (Brisbane),
and 4 (Melbourne), and of Operational Base 1 (Soerabaja, Java). Maj. Gen.
George H. Brett, previously Commanding General, USFIA, continued as Com manding General, USAFIA. After the appointment of Lieutenant General Brett
to the AJ3DA staff, Maj. Gen. Julian F. Barnes, previously Chief of Staff,
formally assumed command of USAFIA on 27 January 1942, and designated Col.
Stephen J. Chamberlin as his Chief of Staff. After the disintegration of
the ABDA command Lieutenant General Brett resumed command of USAFIA on 24
February 1942, with General Barnes as Deputy Commander. On 18 April 1942,
by General Order Ho. 1. GHC*. Southwest Pacific Area (OTA), USAFIA was
designated as one of five commands subordinate to GHQ, SV/PA. On 20 April,
by General Order No. 43, Headquarters, USAFIA, General Barnes again assumed
command of USAFIA. replacing General Brett on the latter-s appointment as
Commander, Allied Air Force.
The change of command on 27 January 1942 was preceded and accompanied
by uncertainty as to the relation between TTS^IA and the 4BDA command.
Correspondence on this subject, beginning as early as 12 January 1943,
- IS
exhibits differences of opinion between Maj. Gen. Lewis H. Brereton (for merly Commanding General, Far East Air Force), who was appointed "by Gen eral Wavell as Deputy Chief of Air Staff, ABDA command, and by the War
Department as commanding general of all American tactical forces in the
area; Lieutenant General Brett, appointed by General Wavell as Intendant
General and Deputy Supreme Commander, ABDA Area, and by the War Department
as commander of the U. S. air forces in the area; and Major General Barnes,
appointed by the War Department as Commanding General, USAFIA, on 18 Jan uary, though his assumption of command was postponed nine days. General
Brereton announced on 17 January that he assumed command of all TJ. S. Army
forces in Australia and the Netherlands East Indies, and General Brett
announced on. 20 January that he would supervise all air activities in the
ABDA area and would coordinate all administrative, supply, and maintenance
activities for both air and ground forces. From 12 January 1942, when
General Brett arrived at Batavia, till 27 January 1942, when General Barnes
assumed command of USAFIA, the actual functions of command of USAFIA were
exercised by General Brereton according to his understanding of his instruc tions.
On 30 January 1942 General Marshall, Chief of Staff, replied as follows
to a request from General Barnes for clarification of his status:
Although your relationship to Brereton is not, repeat not, that of
direct subordinate this departure from normal U. S. practice was authorized
only upon specific recommendation of ABDA Headquarters where it was felt
that distances involved do not permit of Brereton exercising direct control
over his services of supply. You are of course subordinate to General
Wavell who commands all U. S. troops in ABDA territory and all U. S. troops
in Australian territory that have been allotted for service in or in sup port of ABDA area. All U. S. Army forces now in Australia have been so
allotted. ... It is our understanding that General Wavell exercises his
control over your forces through medium of General Brett who is Intendant
General and Deputy Supreme Commander of ABDA. - - As previously stated
- 14
your primary duty is the logistical support of Brereton1 s forces and his
calls upon you mast "be answered promptly and effectively.
There was little opportunity to test the working of this command relation
before most of the ABDA staff withdrew from Java. General Brereton and
General Uavell departed for India, where General Brereton became Command ing General, Tenth Air Force, and General Brett returned to Australia.17
No order defining the functions of USAFIA "before 19 April 1942 has
"been found. By a letter issued "by Headquarters, SWPA, on that date and
both combat and service, were thus assigned to the Allied Air Forces, and
all combat elements of the ground forces to the Allied Land Forces. Chan nels of communication for USAFIA were the same as those later prescribed
on 26 February 1943 for USAFFE (described in a later section). The Com
- 15
ties, operation of a graves registration and burial service, reclassifica tion of officers of the services of supply, insuring the evacuation of all
sick and wounded, coordinating all requests for air transportation, obtain ing such transportation, and doing all construction - all under the super vision of USAFFE. (2) Two functions retained by USASOS did not apply at
receipt of requisitions for sup
centers was a function of USAFIA and TTSASOS, but replacement of Air Corps
forces was removed from control of USASOS on 26 February 1943. (4) Various
functions originally performed for all troops by TJSAFIA and USASOS were in
part transferred to the internal administration of combat commands and task
forces on 26 February 1943. These functions included the reception and
plete, but is sufficient to show that USAFIA and later (until 26 February
1943) TTSASOS were actually, in certain respects, the headquarters of all
U. S. Army forces in Australia and later also in New Guinea and other islands,
and that before the reactivation of TJSAFFE the TT. S. Army Services of Supply
bore a aisleadingly narrow title. 19 Much of the change, however, had been
made before 26 February 1943. TTSAFIA and USASOS had been relieved of admin istrative responsibility for combat troops by the establishment of the U. 8.
Air Services, 27 April 1942, as an administrative, supply maintenance, and.
engineering command operating under the commander of the Allied Air Forces;
the Fifth Air Force, established 3 September 1942; I Corps, to which the
combat ground forces were assigned on 8 September 1942; and the Sixth Army,
established 16 February 1943. In the meantime it was a responsibility of
G-3, USAFIA (later USASOS), to retain such control over combat troops as
was not assumed by other commanders. This responsibility of USASOS ceased
on 26 February 1943. ^
The staff of USAFIA on 5 January 1942, commanded by General Brett,
consisted of General Barnes (Chief of Staff), 22 other officers, and 13
enlisted men. Additional staff personnel had arrived by 9 January, includ ing Col. Stephen J. Chamberlin, who later became Chief of Staff, USAFIA,
and Col. Lester J. Whitlock, who became Assistant Chief of Staff, G-4 USAFIA.
By 18 January the staff had grown to 39 and was undergoing organization
into four general and several special staff sections. A transport carrying
a technical and administrative staff group arrived early in February, and
other technical officers followed. The staff increased to 84 by 18 Febru ary and to 306 by 2 June. Most of the additional staff had been recruited
from civilian life by Brig. Gen. Arthur It. Wilson, whose assignment to
- 17
USAFIA and relief from duty with the General Staff were directed by General
Marshall, Chief of Staff, USA, on 21 January. General Wilson was to assem ble "a small group of men with business and organizational background and
with the necessary drive to put over the enormous supply problem developing
in that theater," and was then to proceed by air to SWPA, where he was to
serve initially as Chief Quartermaster, USAFIA. He was selected, as Gen eral Marshall announced on 6 February 1942, for his "outstanding drive and
resourcefulness" and because he had been found "capable of resolving diffi culties and securing results where others were impotent." He was to be
accompanied to the theater by Col. (later Brig. Gen.) James C. Hoop, for merly Vice President and Treasurer of Pan-American Airways, who was to
organize a central purchasing board in Australia, similar to one developed
by him in France during World War I. In the meantime Brigadier General
Chamberlin and Colonel Whit lock were handicapped by lack of officers exper ienced in shipping.
General Wilson and a number of his assistants, constituting "Mission
X,N arrived in Australia on 10 March 1942. General Wilson reported to Gen eral Brett at Melbourne on 11 March 1942 and spent the next eight days in
flying to all base ports and to the main communication centers. He was
appointed Chief Quartermaster, USAFIA, on 21 March 1942, and Assistant
Chief of Staff, G-4, USAFIA, on 2 April. He was relieved from this duty
on 25 May 1942, and returned to the United States for other assignment.
General fioop, his mission accomplished, also returned.21
In the meantime the Army had established liaison with the Australians
by means of committees. On arriving in Melbourne on 3 January 1942, three
days before the redesignatlon of USFIA as USAFIA, General Brett, accompanied
- 18
- 19
tions of the various subcommittees were presented through the Administra tive Planning Committee for approval by the Chiefs of Staff Committee. 22
Originally Australia was regarded mainly as a rear base supporting an
air war in the Philippines and the Netherlands Bast Indies. Jailure to
hold these areas forced the Army to change its supply policy. Facilities
had to be developed in Australia for the accommodation of large U. S. for ces, land and naval as well as air, and for the reception, manufacture, or
local procurement of the supplies and equipment necessary for protracted
front-line operations in New Guinea and the Bismarck Archipelago and later
in the Philippines. Only when these facts began to be realized, in or
about February or March 1942, did it become possible to make long-range
supply plane. From a combat standpoint it may well be argued that only the
resistance of Allied forces in the Philippines and the Netherlands East
Indies delayed and diverted the Japanese sufficiently to permit the success ful defense of Australia and southern New Guinea; but the effort to supply
the Philippines and Java postponed the time when effective supply operations
could be undertaken. The supply history of the war, as distinguished from
the combat history, virtually began when it first became clear that New
Guinea, not Java or the Philippines, would be for a considerable time the
main zone of combat and the objective of supply activity. Supply operations
of USAFIA before the abandonment of Java can therefore be summarized as a
dead-end episode, hough the facilities planned for the supply of Java and
Luzon were latt* useful in supplying New Guinea*
The first systematic statement of supply policy for SWPA was contained
in ttG-4 Administrative Order -- Plan X,M dispatched to the Commanding Gen eral, USFIA, on 20 December 1941. It contained the following clauses (some
- 20
of which have been mentioned above in other connections): (l) The Com manding General, USFIA, was authorized to do whatever was necessary to
move supplies, equipment, arms, and ammunition to the Philippines. (2)
He was directed to "exploit local resources by local purchases to the
fullest extent possible." (3) He was to build up in Australia and the
Philippines 60 days of supplies, 60 days of ammunition for the Air Forces,
and for ground forces the quantity of ammunition authorized on 10 Septem ber 1941 for the Philippines. (4) He was to give highest priority to
accumulating and forwarding the supplies and ammunition specifically re quested since 7 December 1941 by General MacArthur. (5) The supply arms
and services in the United States were to make shipments of the supplies
and ammunition mentioned in (3) and (4) in accordance with approved prior ities and without request, to the extent that available supply and shipping
would permit. (6) The War Department would control transportation from
the United States to Australia and from the United States direct to the
Philippines. (7) The Commanding General, USFIA, under the direction of
the Commanding General, USAFFE, would control water transportation in the
Far East. (8) On request of the Commanding General, USFIA, the War Depart
ment would supply vessels and other transportation equipment not available
locally. (9) The Commanding General, USFIA, was authorized to make con
tracts without reference to the War Department and "to overobligate funds
for the accomplishment of urgent construction." (10) Funds in the amount
889954 O50 4
PI mm
aJ
- 22
and its mission to supply the Netherlands East Indies were "almost diametri cally opposed to each other and caused much concern to those in Australia
who were endeavoring to accomplish both missions 100$ effectively"; but
this distraction from the task of Philippine supply ended within two months
with the collapse of the ABDA command. The combined effect, however, of
the two distractions, joined to the directive of 2 February, was to reduce
- 23
- 24
that the quantity of antiaircraft ammunition on hand permitted only oc casional "bursts of fire during "bombing attacks. The garrison was on half
rations from the "beginning. General MacArthur asserted on 17 January that
the effectiveness of the Japanese "blockade was due to "passive acceptance11
of it "by the Allies, that he was "professionally certain" that it could "be
easily pierced, and that a general plan of blockade-running should "be under taken at once. He added that the Filipinos could not understand why the
United States forces failed to break the Pacific blockade when they succeeded
in getting through the Atlantic blockade. President Quezon complained to
President Roosevelt on 8 February that after two months of war "not the
slightest assistance" had been received from the United States, that no
effort had been made to bring anything to Luzon, and that the U. S. Navy
and the British Navy had adopted an attitude which apparently precluded any
effort to reach the Philippines, though aid had been dispatched to England,
Australia, and other warring nations.31
It was far from true that no effort had been made to relieve Luzon.
On 17 January 1942 General Marshall instructed the Commanding General,
USAPIA, to use funds without stint, to send "groups of bold and resourceful
men" by plane to the Dutch islands to buy food and charter vessels, to
offer bonuses for delivering supplies to Bataan and Corregidor that would
"insure utmost energy and daring on part of masters," to dispatch great
numbers of small and medium-size boats incessantly by many routes until a
satisfactory level of supply was reached, and to take great risks and ex hibit J indomitable determination and pertinacity." On 19 January General
Marshall notified the Commanding General, USAPIA, that he was sending Brig.
Gen. Patrick J. Hurley (appointed minister to New Zealand) as his personal
- 25
Hal stead and the USAT Tulagi sailed from Darwin for Timor on 15 February
1942 in company with the cruiser Houston, the destroyer Peary, and the Aus tralian war sloops Swan and V/arigo. An attack on 16 January by 44 four-
engine Japanese bombers forced the convoy to return for repairs to Darwin.
Lack of docking facilities made it necessary for the ships to anchor in the
stream, with troops, equipment, and ammunition aboard. On 19 February a
force of from 72 to 90 Japanese planes bombed Darwin, sank the Mauna Loa.
the Admiral Halstead (in shallow water), the Meigs. and most of the other
vessels in harbor, and forced the beaching of the Portmar, Reports as to
losses at Darwin are not easily harmonized, but it is safe to say that
nearly all the shipping there was destroyed, in addition to at least eight
of the ten fighter planes. One other effort was made to relieve Java, when
on 22 February the Sea Witch sailed from Melbourne. The vessel turned back
determined from available records, only the eight .Army vessels here men tioned sailed from Australia for Java and only the Bloemfontein and the
President Polk arrived. 33
Sight Army vessels are known to have sailed for the Philippines. The
Hanyang and the Yochow had sailed on or before 2 February 1942 from Perth,
where they had received cargo from the Mormacsun. After the bombing of
Darwin their crews forced the two vessels, already in the Timor Sea, to
abandon the voyage and put in at Darwin, where their cargoes were unloaded.
The Coast Farmer sailed from Brisbane 10 February, delivered its cargo at
Anakan, Mindanao, on 17 February, and returned safe. The Don Isidro sailed
from Batavia 13 February and was sunk off Darwin on 19 February. The
26 February and was presumed lost. The Dona Hati and the Anhui sailed from
Brisbane late in February, arrived at Cebu City on 10 and 20 March respec tively, and returned to Australia. Search in the East Indies had located
only four other vessels, for which no crews were found. No other vessels
became available in Australia, where rations and ammunition awaited ship ment to the Philippines. Small vessels in the Philippines undertook to
deliver cargoes from Mindanao and Cel?u to Corregidor, but the only one known
to have escaped capture or destruction en route was the Elcano. which arrived
34
at Corregidor on 26 February.*"
General Marshall and Admiral Ernest J. King, Chief of Naval Operations,
against objections from General Wavell, agreed on 29 January that submarines
- 27
left Darwin in February but is not known to have arrived. A third left
Soerabaja 4 February and delivered ammunition at Parang, Mindanao, on 22
February. Two-which left Fremantle at an unknown date loaded B rations
and medicines at Cebu; one of these succeeded in delivering a fifth of its
cargo at Corregidor on 8 April (the day when Sataan fell), but the other
jettisoned its cargo of 46 tons off Corregidor on 9 April. Two others left
Fremantle on 1 and 2 April with food and ammunition but turned back when
Bataan fell. A submarine carrying only mail left Fremantle on 27 March
and received nurses, officers, and outgoing mail at Corregidor on 3 May,
three days before its surrender.35
On 22 February 1942, three days after the Coast Farmer arrived in
Mindanao, General MacArthur reported to General Marshall that the Philip pines should be supplied by a direct route from Honolulu, and that the
commanders of Australia and the Netherlands East Indies lacked resources
and means to supply his needs, could not concentrate on doing so, and did
not have complete knowledge of his "desperate and dangerous11 situation*
- 28
- 29
that General Brett was not relieved of responsibility for supplying the
Philippines. Three of the converted destroyers the Masaya. the Mata galpa. and the Tea-pa sailed from New Orleans on 2, 11, and 18 March
r esp ectively. *?
While these measures were in progress the situation in Bataan and
Corregidor grew more desperate. On 27 March General Marshall informed
General MacArthur in Australia that General Wainwright's forces were in
urgent need of food and medicine, particularly quinine sulphate tablets,,
atabrine, and vitamin concentrates. Interisland supply had been destroyed
fey the Japanese, General Wainvright was unable to obtain the rations on
hand in Cebu and Mindanao, and General MacArthur was urged to relieve him
by air, submarine, or small, speedy vessels able to run the blockade. In
the meantime the Masaya. the MatagaTpa. and the Teapa were obliged to stop
at Los Angeles for repairs and complete reloading. The Commanding General,
Hawaiian Department, obtained the Navy-chartered freighter Thomas Jefferson,
which sailed from Honolulu for the Philippines during the first week in
April but was diverted by the Navy to Hew Caledonia and then recalled to
Honolulu* A submarine departed from Honolulu on 7 April with 100 tons of
medical supplies but had not arrived when Bataan fell and was therefore
ordered back* All vessels sailing from the United States for PLUM were
stopped. On 12 April General Marshall requested the comments and recommen dations of General MacArthur regarding the supply of Corregidor. General
MacArthur replied on 13 April 1942 that with both Cavite and Bataan shores
occupied by the Japanese it became "practically impossible" for shipping
of any kind to reach the defenders. He regarded it as "useless to attempt
further general supply by blockade running.11 The War Department decided
- 30
not to accept this view, and on 21 April ordered the Masaya to be reloaded
for Corregidor and the Matagalpa for Mindanao. The Maaaya arrived at Hon olulu 5 May, the Mata^alpft 8 May, and the Teata 23 May much too late to
relieve Corregidor.38
Both the War Department and USAFIA had continued till the end their
efforts to support Corregidor. Supplies were sent from Australia to Min danao by air less than a week before the surrender of Corregidor, and at
the same time an unnamed vessel was en route from Australia to the Philip pines. In reviewing the whole record of Philippine supply Brig. Gen.
Charles C. Drake, Chief Quartermaster, U. S. Forces in the Philippines,
concluded that the long delay between the landing of IT. S. troops in Aus tralia on 23 December 1941 and the sailing of the first blockade-runner,
the Coast Farmer, on 10 February 1942, giving the Japanese an opportunity
to establish a blockade and occupy most of the Visayas, was responsible
for the early surrender of Corregidor, and that with prompter shipments
from Australia and with "a reasonable air and naval support0 for convoying
*
lnterisland movements in the Philippines, Corregidor might have been held
till 1 July 1942. 39
Commands of General Douglas MacArthur. 1942-1946
It is hardly possible to treat separately the three commands held by
General MacArtfaur after his arrival in Australia: the Southwest Pacific
Area (SWPA) command, 18 April 1942 - 2 September 1945; the U. S. Forces in
the Far Bast (USAFFE), second period, 26 February 1943 - 10 June 1946; and
the U. S # Army Forces, Pacific (AFPAC), 6 April 1945 - 31 December 1946.
These commands overlapped chronologically, they did not form a hierarchy,
- 31
New Guinea and the Bismarck Archipelago, the Philippines, Hainan, all of
the East Indies except Sumatra, and part of the Solomon Islands. The area
under General MacArthur1 s immediate control in the Western Pacific was ex tended on 26 July 1945 to include Okinawa and Ie Shima. These increments,
though not added to the Allied command, may be (and are hereafter) con sidered as part of the Southwest Pacific Area after that date. 41
- 32
The command began its formal existence with the issuance of General
Order Ho. 1, GHQ,, SVTPA, 18 April 1942, announcing the establishment of
General MacArthur's headquarters at Melbourne and of five subordinate com mands: Allied Land Forces, under Gen. Sir Thomas Blarney, Australian Army;
Allied Air Forces, under Lt. Gen. George C. Brett, USA; Allied Naval Forces,
under Vice Admiral Herbert F. Leary, USN; U. S. Forces in the Philippines,
under Lt. Gen. Jonathan M. Wainwright, USA; and TJ. S. Army Forces in Aus tralia (first established, as mentioned above, on 5 January 1942), under
Maj. Gen. Julian F. Barnes, USA. General MacArthur's official title was
It will be noted
that the last two of the five subordinate commands were U. S. Army commands
subject to General MacArthur in his capacity of commanding general over all
U. S. Army forces in the area. In this connection he continued in effect
headquarters of the Allied Land Forces, the Allied Naval Forces, and the
42
Allied Air Forces,, on 20 July 1942.
Details of thereestablishment of USAFFE, with headquarters at Bris bane, were announced on 23 February 1943. The reestablishment became ef fective on 26 Februaryt when the functions of USAFFE were defined in a
letter from headquarters, USATFB, to the Commanding Generals of the Sixth
Army, the Fifth Air Force, and USASOS Army then in SWPA. the three components of the U. S.
- 33
and control "the strategic and tactical operations of units of the United
States Army Forces in the Par East." Headquarters, USAIT1, was to direct,
- 34
but corresponding U. S. services were charged with the supply of "the small
K.E.I, components.11 Coordination to achieve the best "use of resources,
There was no "combined
Allied Service Forces for the theater to correspond with the Allied combat
forces Land, Naval and Air." The main reason making such a combined ser
vice organization impracticable was that the Australian service forces con stituted in effect "the Australian zone of the interior." were not under the Commander in Chief, SWPA. These forces
elements were "closely coordinated" by the Chief Signal Officer, GHQ,, and
there was also a Chief Engineer in GHQ; but no corresponding officer in
GBQ was concerned with transportation. Water transportation was coordinated
by G-4, GHQ,, "so as to utilize available shipping in furtherance of the
operational plan, regardless of its assignment or of the troops and supplies
being moved."
From a combat standpoint the U. S. forces in the theater operated
under one of the three Allied combat forces or as elements in task forces
operating directly under GHQ. From an administrative standpoint they oper
ated under Headquarters, USAFFE, for the Army, and under Headquarters,
Seventh Fleet, for the Navy. Some of the service troops of the U. S. Army
were "integrally a part of a troop unit" of the Sixth Army or the Fifth
- 35
Air Force; the others were assigned to USASOS or to task forces as required.
G-4, USAFFE, was concerned with "policies and planning of supply, transpor tation and evacuation"; operation of service forces rested with the comman ders concerned, including the Commanding General, USASOS. There was no
unity among U. S. Army, Air, Navy, and Marine forces with respect to supply,
administrative services, communications, transportation, and construction.
Each element operated independently in these particulars, though coordina tion was achieved by GHQ staff action, and to some extent, through a General
Purchasing Agent in US.AFFE. General Somervell remarked that the U. S.
naval force in SWPA was "supplied and serviced practically entirely through
naval channels" and that the Fifth Air Force included a service command
that was devoted mainly to technical air force supply but that tended "to
try to duplicate the supply and service activities afforded by USASOS.11
As between the U. S. Army and other forces, there was "in general a com plete duplication of supply of common items." General Somervell concluded
that in the U. S. Army there seemed to be "too many levels and too many
different staffs'1 but that supply operations seemed nevertheless to move
44
smoothly.
On 31 July 1948, in response to inquiry from General Marshall, Chief
of Staff, General MacArthur had explained that Allied land forces, naval
forces, and air forces each operated under a commander with completely
organized staff, and that in matters of Allied action he relied on "com plete and thorough integration" of ground, naval, and air headquarters
with GHty rather than upon the assembly of approximately equal numbers of
officers from these components into the GHQ staff. GHQ and the naval and
air headquarters were in the same building at Brisbane, and land headquar
- 36
889954 O50
'
- 38
- 40
title indicated
Baring the next twenty-one months the services of supply under Gen eral Frink established bases at Lae, Finschhafen, Hollandia, Biak, Tacloban,
Lingayen Gulf, Manila, Batangas, and Cebu. Headquarters, USASOS, consisting
of about 500 officers, 700 enlisted men and 600 enlisted women, was trans ferred to Hollandia, New Guinea, on 8 September 1944, to Leyte on 4 Febru ary 1945, and to Manila on 11 April 1945. Advance echelons of USASOS were
serving in forward areas before these dates.53 On 16 May 1945 General Mac-
Arthur recommended award of the oakleaf cluster to the distinguished ser vice medal to General Prink for "exceptionally meritorious service to the
Government in a position of great responsibility" from 14 August 1943 to
16 May 1945* In General MacArthur's words,
General Frink, vjith rare ability, organized and directed the difficult
and important functions of his command. Vttth great devotion to duty
and inexhaustible energy, he was responsible for coordinating and making
effective an efficient Services of Supply. By his sound judgment, thor ough professional qualifications, and forceful leadership, he made a
substantial contribution to the successful operations in the Southwest
Pacific Area. 54
In a general order addressed to "Soldiers of USASOS," 12 February
1945, shortly after occupation of Manila, General Frink gave credit to
the organization under his command:
On the long road back - Moresby - Milne Bay - Oro Bay - Lae - ^insch hafen - Hollandia - Biak - Leyte - Lingayen - and Manila - you have built
great cities and airdromes in the Jungles, moved mountains, bridged mighty
rivers, constructed thousands of miles of highways, and erected huge port
terminals though which have flowed hundreds of thousands of troops and
millions of tons of supplies. You have carved countless acres of camp
sites out of the forests for the staging of task forces going into battle.
You have established immense stores of munitions of war and operated a
great fleet of ocean going vessels to distribute them over a line of com munications six thousand miles long. You have set up well equipped and
efficiently operated hospitals for the care of the sick and wounded. You
have built huge shops and arsenals for the maintenance and repair of arms,
- 41
armament, vehicles, and equipment. And you have bound all these together
with a modern high-speed system of signal communications that reach to all
parts of the world.
Whether in the midst of mortal combat with the enemy or engaged in
vitally essential tasks on land and sea, you have overcome all obstacles
and acquitted yourselves with honor and distinction.
May your pride in these fine accomplishments spur you on to Tokyo with
renewed vigor and determination.^
The history of USASOS was characterized by constantly changing supply
situations and repeated reorganizations to fit these changes. When General
Prink assumed command of USASOS, the main base of supply operations was
still the east coast of Australia; when he was transferred for other duty
the main base was Manila. Throughout this period the zone of combat was
shifting northwest, not by a steady progress but in leaps of hundreds or
thousands of miles. Sudden readjustments of supply and changes in the "cen Arrangements that
- 42
lian female employees and with voluminous files and office equipment,
could not have been transferred conveniently to the jungles of New Guinea.
The assignment of headquarters functions to "base sections was a spec ial case of decentralization. During the whole period "between the trans
re
as follows:
(l) Maintains constant review of the organization and activities of
the United States Army Services of Supply, conducts specific surveys in
fields requiring corrective action, and makes recommendations in regard
thereto. (2) Where appropriate, recommends new general administrative or
organizational policies or procedures for, or changes of existing policies
of, the United States Army Services of Supply. (3) Acts as staff agency
over the execution of control functions throughout the United States Army
Services of Supply. (4) Supervises and coordinates statistical and reporting
- 43
systems and methods of the United States Army Services of Supply, including
clearance of recurring reports.5?
The Control Branch prepared an organizational manual issued by the
Commanding General, USASOS, on 1 January 1944. This manual and the numbered
and dated revisions of its various sections served "both as a constantly up to-date description of the organization of USASOS and as a directive pre scribing changes in organization; and at the same time the manual "set up,
in broad terms, operational and administrative procedures" for the general
CO
- 44
- 45
- 46
Notes on Chapter I
1. No manuscript or printed account of the organization and admin istration of the Southwest Pacific Area as a whole has been found. In
this study the subject is dealt with only as related to transportation.
Two charts, labeled "United States Army Services of Supply, Southwest Pac ific Area" and "United States Army Forces, Western Pacific," prepared by
Capt. Robert R. Smith, Historical Division, SSUSA, have been repeatedly
consulted in the preparation of this chapter and the following. Copies
of the charts are in the file of the Historical Branch, Office of the Chief
of Transportation, under SWPA - Organization. The file will be designated
throughout this study as OCT HB file. All abbreviations and symbols used
hereafter are identified in a note at the end of this study.
2. Had (par), CofS USA to Gen Douglas Mac^rtfaur, 27 Jul 41. In OCT
HB file, SWPA - Philippines - Organization* The Philippine Department,
commanded by Maj Gen George Grunert from May 1940 to Oct 1941, became a
supply organization and was redesignated in Jan 1942 as the Bataan Service
Command.
3. (l) Reinforcement of the Philippines, prepared by Alfred J. Bing ham, HB OCT, 1 Sep 47. In OCT HB file, SWPA. (2) Memo, Actg ACofS G-4
GSUSA (Brig Gen R. A. Wheeler) for TAJG, 8 Oct 41, sub: Supply of Gasoline
for U. S. Forces in the Far East. In OCT HB file, SWPA - Philippines Supply. (3) Ltr, AG, U. S. Forces in the Philippines, to TAG, 26 Mar 42.
In OCT 370.5-SS9 SWPA (clear file). (4) Statistical Summary, Transporta tion Corps, issued by Control Div OCT SOS, Ho. 13 (15 Oct 42), p. 38. (5)
Monograph Ho. 5, Historical Unit, OCT ASF, prepared by Mr. Harold Larson,
Aog 1944, sub: Water Transportation for the United States -*rmy, 1939-1942,
pp. 82-86. In OCT HB file, monographs. (6) Ltr, Actg ACofS G-4 GSUSA to
CG SITE, 1 Oct 41, sub: Code Names for Shipments to Philippine Islands,
G-4/27573-25. In GSUSA G-4, Transportation Br file, 000.900 Philippines,
Vol II. (7) Memo, Lt Col C. M. Easley, GSC, for ACofS G-4 GSUSA, 7 Oct 41,
sub: Transportation for Aviation Gasoline in Far East. Same file. (8)
Memo, Actg ACofS G-4 GSUSA for TAG, 22 Oct 41, sub: Schedule of Shipments
to Philippines, G-4/27573-18. Same file. (9) Rad (par), CG USAZFE to TAG,
25 Oct 41, AG 575.l(l0-25-4l)MC. Same file.
4. The Mactan. built in Scotland in 1898, was an oil-burning freight
and passenger vessel 312 feet long, wit'h a speed of from 10 to 12 knots and
a cargo capacity of 97,965 cubic feet. It was chartered by the Army from
the owners, Compania Maritima, in Dec 1942, and three days later was char tered by the Filipino Red Cross in Manila. After the vessel arrived in
Australia the charter was canceled in February 1942 and the vessel, con sidered unseaworthy, was used by the Australians as a floating storehouse.
Shipping shortage led the U. S. Army to take over the Mactan again in Jan
1943 and convert part of the cargo space into troop compartments. Later
the vessel was used as a station ship in Hew Guinea, where it was occupied
by the CG, USASOS. On 29 Hov 44 the Mactan sailed from Hollandia for Leyte
with the advance echelon of Hq, USASOS. The vessel was used as quarters
- 47
for the CG, USASOS, and his staff at Tacloban, and later as an interisland
transport out of Manila, On 1 Sep 45 it needed extensive repairs and was
about to be returned to its owners, (l) HTC Hq., Sep-Oct 1944, p. 7; Nov
1944, p. 2 (2) Had, OQ>IG to CG USAFIA, 16 Feb 42. In OCT HB file, Ocean
Transportation - Vessels - Name File. (3) Transportation Corps Courier,
AFWESPAC, Vol I, No. 7 (l Sep 45), p. 6. In OCT HB file, SWPA - TC Courier.
The abbreviation HTC is used throughout this study to designate the serial
histories of the Transportation Corps in the Southwest Pacific Area pre pared by the transportation office in the theater and filed in OCT HB file.
The series is described in note at the end of this study.
5. (1) Memo, ACofS G-3 USAFIA for CG USAJIA, 11 Jul 42, sub; History
of G-3, USAFIA, 1 Jan - 30'Jun 42. App 4 to rpt, Maj Gen Julian F. Barnes,
formerly CG USAPIA, to AG USASOS, 6 Nov 42, sub: Report of Organization and
Activities, United States Armed Forces in Australia, 7 Dec 4 1 - 3 0 Jun 42.
(Hereafter cited as Barnes B p O In SSUSA HD file. (2) Military History
of the United States Army Services of Supply in the Southwest Pacific, com piled by USASOS, undtd. (Hereafter cited as USASOS Military History.)
Same file. (3) Information from Pacific Sec, HD SSUSA.
6. (l) Barnes Rpt, pp. 1-7. (2) Task Force - South Pacific, GO 1,
12 Dec 41. Incl 2 in Barnes Rpt. (3),Rad, 0ofS USA, to CO, Task Force South Pacific, 13 Dec 41, Incl 4 to Barnes Rpt. U ) USASOS Military His tory. (5) Diary, Hq USAFIA, prepared by a staff officer of USAFIA. Final
incl, unnumbered, in Barnes Rpt. (6) Task Force - South Pacific, GO 4, 19
Dec 41. Incl 8 in Barnes Rpt.
7. (1) Barnes Rpt, pp. 6-7. Memo, Actg ACofS WPD, GSUSA (Brig Gen
L. T. Gerow) for CNO, 12 Dec 41, sub: Messages for Transmission (Convoy to
Brisbane), AG 381 Far Eastern Situation (11-27-41) Gen., inclosing message,
Marshall to MacArthur. In OCT EB file, SWPA - Shipping. (3) Memo, Actg
ACofS WPD GSUSA for TAG, 17 Dec 41, sub: Secret Orders to General Brett,
inclosing message, Marshall to Brett. In G-4/33861, Vol I. (4) Ltr, Deputy
CofS USA (Maj Gen R. C. Moore) to CG USFIA, 19 Dec 41. Same file. (5)
Ltr, TAG to CG USFIA, 20 Dec 41, sub: G-4 Administrative Order - Plan X,
AG 38l(l2-20-4l)MSC-D-M. In GSUSA G-4, Transportation Br file, 000.900
Australia, Vol I. (6) Serial 738 (J.B. 325), Joint Army-Navy Board, special
meeting 20a, 21 Dec 41, sub: Agreement on Organization and Coordination of
Army and Navy Support for Army and Navy Forces in the Philippines, the
Netherlands East Indies, and Australia. Notes in OCT HB file, SWPA - Phil ippines - Miscellaneous.
8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (1) Barnes Rpt, pp. 7-10. (l) Barnes Rpt, pp. 8-10. Barnes Rpt, pp. 12-15.
Ibid., pp. 8-11.
Proceedings of the American-British Joint Chiefs of Staff Conference
(2) USASOS Military History.
(2) HTC Australia, I, 1-2.
- 48
- 49
20. (1) Memo, ACofS G-3 USAPIA for CG USAPIA, 11 Jul 42, sub: His tory of G-3, USAFIA. App 4 to Barnes Rpt. (2) Development of the U. S.
Supply Base in Australia, p. 13. (3) The Army Air Forces in World War II.
I, 421-22, 717. (4) TJSASOS Military History, pp. 20-21.
21. (1) Barnes Rpt, pp. 20-21, 23a-24. (2) TJSASOS Military History,
pp. 4-5. (3) Memo, CofS USA for General Bryden, 21 Jan 42. In G-4/33861,
Vol II. (4) Ltr, CofS USA to CO USAPIA, 6 Peb 42. Same file. ( . 5 ) Ltr,
GofS USAPIA (Brig G-en Stephen J. Chamberlin) to ACofS G-4 GSUSA, 26 Peb
42. In OCT 563.5 Statistical Data. (6) Rpt, Brig Gen Arthur R. Wilson
to CG SOS, cited in n. 19. (7) Ltr, Chief QP, USAPIA (Brig Gen Arthur R.
Wilson), to CG SOS, 26 Mar 42. In OCT 541.2-558 StfPA.
22. (l) Barnes Rpt, pp. 16-18. General Barnes was originally a mem ber of all three committees. ^2) Report of Administrative Planning Com mittee to Accompany Report on Organization and Activities, USAPIA. App 22
to Barnes Rpt. (3) Development of the U. S. Supply Base in Australia, pp.
21-23.
23* Ltr, TAG to CG USPIA, 20 Dec 41, cited in n. 7(5).
24. Ltr, TAG to CG USAPIA, 2 Peb 42, sub: Supply of United States
Army Porces in the Australian Area, AG 400( 1-31-42)MSC-D-M. In G-4/33861,
Vol II, There are two earlier drafts of this letter: (l) Memo, Chief,
Supply Br G-4 GSUSA (Col H. B. Holmes, Jr) for Asst Executive, G-4, 20 Jan
42, subs Amended Supply Paragrapns for Revision of G-4 Administrative Order
- Plan X, G-4/33861. In OCT HB file, SWPA - Supply. (2) Ltr, TAG to CG
USAFIJL^ 1 Peb 42, sub: Supply of United States Army Porces in the Austra lian Area, AG 400(l-31-42)MSC-D-M. In GSUSA G-4, Transportation Br file,
000.900 Australia, Vol I.
25, "X" as a designation for Australia was apparently unofficial, but
had been used as early as 20 Dec 41, when it appeared in the title of nG-4
Administrative Order - Plan X." Though the ACofS, War Plans Div, referred
thus to Australia on 3 January 42, the Deputy Director of Operations, SOS,
observed on 30 Apr 42 that "The designation ! X' has never been authorized
for official use and is unknown to most War Department agencies," and di rected the CofTS to eliminate the use of this term in his organization.
On 1 May 42 the Transportation Service notified the CO, Seattle Port of
Embarkation, that SUMAC to designate Australia should be added to a list
of secret code designations previously furnished; but on 3 May the Chief,
Traffic Sec, Transportation Service, informed the CG, SPPE, that "The term
'X1 is used to designate Australia in official correspondence." "X" appar ently continued to be used in this sense for a considerable time afterward,
(l) Memo, Deputy Director of Operations, SOS (Col R. C. L. Graham) for CofTS,
30 Apr 42, Improper Use of Code Words. (2) Memo, Col N. M. Coe, Transpor tation Service, to CO, Seattle Port of Embarkation, 1 May 42, sub: Code
Designations. (3) Memo, Chief, Traffic Sec, Transportation Service (Col
- 50
N. H. Vissering), to CG STPB, 3 May 42. All in OCT 370.5- SWPA (clear file),
26. (1) Memo, ACofS WPD GSUSA (Brig Gen L. T. Gerow) for ACofS G-4
GSUSA, 3 Jan 42, sub; Defense Reserve Levels for "X," WPD 4630-15. In OOT
KB file, SWPA - Shipping. (2) Memo, Actg Executive, G-4 GSUSA, for Chiefs,
Transportation Br, Construction & Real Estate Br, and Supply Br, 10 Jan 42,
sub: Shipments for Forces in the Philippines. In GSUSA G-4, Transportation
Br file, 000.900 Philippines, Vol II.
27. Memo, ACofS G-4 GSUSA for QtfG, 16 Jan 42, sub: Supply of Troops in
Australia and in the Pacific Islands. In G-4/33861, Vol II.
28. 29. 30. Development of the U. S. Supply Base in Australia, p. 127.
Barnes Rpt, pp. 21-22.
Ltr, CofS USA to CG USAFIA, 6 Feb 42. In G-4/33861, Vol II.
35. (1) Blockade Running to the Philippines. (2) Memo, CofS USA for
CHO, 29 Jan 42, sub: Attached Message from General Wavell, WPD 4560-9.
In OCT HB file, SWPA - Philippines - Supply. (3) Memo, CHO for CofS USA,
29 Jan 42, sub: Gen. Wavell1 s Despatch re Use of Submarines, WPD 4560-9.
Same file. (4) Rad, CofS USA to CG, U. S. Army Forces in the Philippines,
30 Mar 42. Same file.
36. (1) Rad (par), CG USAFEE to CofS USA, 22 Feb 42, G-4/33817. In
GSUSA G-4, Transportation Br file, 000.900 Philippines, Vol II. (2) Rad,
CG USAFIA to CofS USA, 4 Mar 42, sub: PI Relief. In OCT HB file, SWPA Philippines - Supply.
37 (l) Memo, ACofS G-4 GSUSA for CofS USA, 22 Feb 42, sub: Supply of
U. S. Forces in the Philippines, G-4/33817. In OCT KB file, SWPA - Philip
- 51
pines.- Supply. (2) Ltr, Chief, Transportation Br, G-4 GSUSA (Col C. P.
Gross), to CO NOPE, 23 Feb 42, sub: Supply of the Philippines. Same
number and file. (3) Memo, CofS USA for the President, 24 Feb 42, WPD
4560-26. In OCT HB file, SWPA - Philippines - Shipping. (4) Memo, ACofS
G-4 GSUSA to TAG, 6 Max 42, sub: Supplies for Philippines, containing draft
of rad to CG, USAFIA. In G-4/33861, Vol IV. (5) Blockade Banning to the
Philippines.
38. (1) Memot CofS USA for Chief, Code Sec, AGO, 27 Mar 42, SPRYA
541.2 Philippines, containing draft of rad to CG USABTB. In OCT- 370.5
SWPA. (2) Blockade Running to the Philippines. (3) Memo, Chief, Alloca tions and Schedules Sec, Transportation Service (Maj Richard D. Meyer),
for CofTS, 13 Apr 42. In OCT HB file, SWPA - Philippines - Shipping. (4)
Had, CofS USA to CG USAFFE, 12 Apr 42. In OCT HB file, SWPA - Philippines
- Supply. (5) Rad, CG USAPFB to CofS USA, 13 Apr 42. Same file. (6)
Memo, CG SOS to CG SFPE, 21 Apr 42. In OCT HB file, SWPA - Philippines Shipping.
39. (l) Rpt, Brig Gen Arthur R. Wilson for CG SOS, 1 Jul 42, cited
in n. 19. (2) Blockade Running to the Philippines, quoting Report of Oper ations, Quartermaster General, United States Army, in the Philippine Cam paign, 1941-1942, by Brig Gen Charles C. Drake, Chief QM, U. S. Army Forces
in the Philippines.
40. The southern boundary was not defined but was apparently the inter section of the 110th and 159th meridians at the South Pole.
41. (1) Minutes of Meetings of the Combined Chiefs of Staff: Post-
Arcadia, 12th and 14th meetings, 17 and 31 Mar 42. (2) JCS 388/3, 6 May
44, sub: Summary of Boundaries Currently Used by U. S. Army and Navy; and
map attached to Appendix B of same, showing boundaries with date and auth ority for establishment. In OCT HB file, Overseas - General - Theaters,
Theater Commanders, and Code Names. (3) Memo, ACofS G-4 USAFIA for CG
USAFIA, 11 Jul 42, sub! History of G-3, USAFIA, 1 Jan - 30 Jun 42. App 4
to Barnes Rpt. (4) Had, CinC AFPAC to C, U. S. Army Forces, Middle Paci fic, and OG, 10th Army, 26 Jul 45. In OCT 323.3 SWPA. From other sources
it appears that the eastern boundary drawn on 30 Mar 42 ran south from the
equator on the 165th meridian to 10 S, thence southwest to 17 S, 160 X,
and thence south, and that the straight boundary on the 159th meridian was
established on 1 Aug 42. Admiral King proposed on 18 Feb 43 that the bound ary run south from the equator on the 154th meridian to 8 S, thence south east to 13 S, 160 B, thence south. The line of 30 Mar 42 thus placed all
of the Solomon Islands in SWPA; that of 1 Aug 42 bisected Santa Isabel,
leaving Guadalcanal in SPA and Choiseul and Bougainville in SWPA; and the
proposed line of 18 Feb 43 placed all of the Solomons in SPA. General Mar shall did not approve the proposed change, (l) Memo, CHO for CofS USA, 18
Feb 43, sub: Development of Operations in South-Southwest Pacific, WDCSA
350.4 SPA. (2) Memo, CofS USA for CNO, 19 Feb 43, sub: same, WDCSA 381
SPA( 2-19-43). Both in GSUSA' file.
- 52
42. (1) Barnes Bpt, p. 33. (2) USASOS Military History. (3) Cir cular, TAG, 27 Apr 42, sub: Address of General Douglas MacArthur, U. S.
Army, AG 201 MacArthor, Gen.(4-24-42)OA, In OOT HB, Gross file, Australia.
(4) Ltr, TAG to CGs, AGP, AAF, and SOS, 19 Jul 42, sub: Notification of
Change of GH<}, Southwest Pacific Area. In OCT 323.3 SWPA. '
43. (1) Ltr, Hq USASOS, addressee unnamed, 23 Feb 43, sub: Organiza tion and Administrative Information Incidental to the Establishment of
Headquarters, United States Army Forces in the Par Bast. Quoted in USASOS
Military History, pp. 23-26. (2) Ltr, Hq USAPPB to CGs, 6th Army, 5th Air
Force, and USASOS, 26 Peb 43, sub: Allocation of Administrative Functions
within United States Army Forces in the Par East, cited in n. 18(4). (3)
Rpt, G-4 USAFFE, addressee not named, 15 Apr 43, sub: G-4 Periodic Report,
Quarter Ending March 31, 1943 (except Air Corps Technical Supply). In ASP
Planning Div file, 12c G-4 Reports - SWPA.
44. (l) Somervell questionnaire, 3 Oct 43, questions 2-7b, 15. (2)
Memo, CG ASP for CofS USA, 3 Oct 43. In GSUSA file, WDCSA 350.4 So Pac
Area.
45. Had, CinC SWPA to CofS USA, 31 Jul 43, Cm-In 22577(31 Jul 43).
In ASF Hq file, Chief of Staff.
46. General MacArthur1 3 headquarters was at Manila, Admiral Nimitz's
at Guam; and it was therefore impossible to maintain contact by daily con ference or to merge the two staffs.
47. In Apr 1945 the general staff consisted of Lt Gen Richard K.
Sutherland, CofS; Brig Gen Bonner P. Fellers, ACofS G-l; Brig Gen Charles
A. Willoughby, ACofS G-2; Maj Gen Stephen J. Chamberlin, ACofS G-3; and
Maj Gen Lester J. Whitlock, ACofS G-4.
48. (l) "MArthur Retains Staff for Wider Job." In New York Times.
6 May 45; clipping in OCT HB file, SWPA - Clippings & Releases. (2)
Diary, Pacific Sec, Theater Br, Planning Div, ASP, 16 Jun 45. In ASP
Planning Div file, Diary POA. (3) "Divided Command Seen as a Pacific
Problem. Army, Navy and Air Forces Control Not Unified but Coordinated,11
by Hanson V. Baldwin. In New York Times. 29 Jul 45; clipping in OCT HB
file, Central Pacific - Papers & Releases. (4) "Washington Order." In
New York Times. 5 Aug 45; clipping in OCT HB file, SWPA - Clippings &
Releases. (5) Rad, CinC APPAC to V/D, 3 Sep 45. In G-3 Journal, Hq SWPA.
(6) Information from Capt Robert R. Smith, Pacific Sec, HD, SSUSA. (7)
Rad, Marshall to MacArthur, received at Manila 15 Aug 45, cited in Lt Col
D. W. Eddy, "Manila and the Capitulation." In Signals: Journal of the
Army Signal Association, Vol I, No. 5 (May-Jun 1947), p. 46. General
orders announcing most of these changes have not been found. Authority
for dates of transfer of GHQ,, APO 500, is Numerical Listing of APOs, Jan
1942 - Nov 1947, prepared by Army Postal Service and Strength Accounting
Branches, undtd.
O5f
- 53
49. (1) Rpt, Lt Cols Alfred W. Parry, Jr, and Rudolph G. Lehnau, Con trol Div, ASF, 12 May 43, sub: Report on Inspection Trip, Southwest Pacific
Area and South Pacific Area, 16 March to 4 May 43, p. 3. In OCT HB file,
SWPA - Miscellaneous. (2) "Washington Order." In New York Times. 5 Aug
45; clipping in OCT HB file, SWPA - Clippings & Releases.
50. Army Transportation Corps Weekly News Letter, issued " b y Office of
Technical Information, 20 Aug 46. In OCT HB, Topical file, TC General Biographies.
51. (1) HTC Hq, Mar-Dec 1942, p. 8. (2) HTC Australia, I, 4, 60. (3)
Barnes Rpt, p. 39. U ) GHQ, SWPA GO 17, 20 Jul 42. In 0-3 Journal. (5)
Numerical Listing of APOs, data concerning APO 707.
52. (1) HTC Australia, II, 1-3, 7. (2) USASOS Military History, pp.
20, 28, 32, 33, 35, 40. (3) Development of the U. S. Supply Base in Aus tralia, p. 15.
53. Numerical Listing of APOs, data concerning APO 707, cited in n. 48.
54. Ltr, CinC SWPA to CofS USA, 16 May 45, sub: Recommendation for
Award of the Oakleaf Cluster to the Distinguished Service Medal. In AG
201 Prink, James L.
55. USASOS GO 44, 12 Feb 45. Ref 1 in HTC Hq, Peb 1945.
56. Interviews with Brig Gen Jonathan L. Holman, formerly CofS USASOS,
30 Jun 49; Brig Gen A. Robert Ginsburgh, formerly G-l USASOS, 2 May 49; and
Col Harry H. Baird, formerly G-l USAFFE, 29 Jun 49. The quoted expressions
are from Gen Holman.
57. USASOS GO 93, 20 Dec 43, sub: Mission and Major Functions of Con trol Branch. Exhibit 5 to G-4 Periodic Report, USASOS, Quarter Ending 31
December 1943, undtd. In AG 319.l(31Dec43)(2).
58. Interview with Brig Gen Jonathan L. Holman, cited in n. 56.
Ref 2 to
59. USASOS GO 166, 30 May 45, sub: Assumption of Command. HTC Hq, May 1945.
- 54
and South. Pacific commands) and are not included in this study.
61. AFWESPAC, Semi-Annual Report. 1 Jun - 31 Dec 45, p. viii.
62. (l) Miscellaneous Ltr 170, OCT, 31 Dec 46, sub: Far East Command,
TCADM 323.3. In OCT HB file, SWPA - Miscellaneous. (2) HTC Hq, Jan 1947,
p. 1.
- 55
CHAPTER II
Service policies in the Southwest Pacific .Area were formed in head quarters; service operations centered in ports and were controlled by the
commands that controlled the ports. No headquarters of the services of
supply as a whole (as distinguished from single services) was established
at any inland point.
The ports formed two classes: (l) "supply points" (such as Merauke,
Morotai, and Zamboanga), which remained under tactical commands and were
never transferred to the services of supply; and (2) ports in which the
U. S. Army established "base command11 headquarters, "base section" head quarters, "base" headquarters, or "port headquarters." fined in this chapter to ports of the second class.
Of the twenty-two ports in the second class the eight Australian ports,
Port Moresby, and Milne Bay were never occupied by the Japanese. The other
Attention is con
twelve ports (six in New Guinea, five in the Philippines, and one in Oki nawa) were seized from the Japanese. The service operations of such a
trol of the services of supply and if a local service command had been
established by the tactical command, the service commsjid was turned over
to the services of supply. If such a command had not been established,
This chapter is limited to the headquar
- 56
of supply.
Commands of the U. S. Army services of supply located in the twenty-
two ports of the second class, with the exception of Naha, were designated
by either numbers or letters. Headquarters of a local command of the U. S.
Army services of supply were located in, and controlled, each of the ports,
and more or less extensive adjacent territory, between the dates indicated
in the following table. No numbers or letters other than those included
in the table were assigned to local headquarters of the services of supply.
Designation Location Darwin Townsvilie Brisbane Melbourne (Adelaide (Cairns Perth Sydney Milne Bay Oro Bay Beli-Beli Bay Port Moresby Lae Finschhafen Hollandia Biak Tacloban Lingayen Gulf Unassigned Batangas Cebu City Unassigned Manila ITaha 5 5 5 5 3 7 3 15 20 13 27 6 19 15 7 20 25 13 11 23 5 5 13 31 Dates Jan 42 9 Jul 44 Jan 42 - 20 Jun 45 Jan 42 - 20 Jun 45 Jan 4 2 - 1 Jun 44 Mar 4 2 - 8 Jan 43 Sep 4 3 - 7 Feb 44 Mar 42 - 10 Jan 43 Mar 42 - 30 Nov 46 Aug 42 - 25 Jul 45 Dec 4 2 - 7 Sep 45 Apr 43 - 45 Jun 42 7 Sep 45 Sep 43 7 Sep 45 Nov 43 - 30 Apr 46 Jun 44 - 25 Jan 46 Aug 4 4 - 6 Apr 46 Dec 44 Feb 45 Apr 45 - 10 Jun 45 Apr 45 - 26 May 47 May 4 5 - 1 5 Feb 46 Apr 45 - 10 Jun 45 Feb 45 Jul 45
1
2 3 4
c
6 7
A B C D E F G H K M
0,
R S T X
OBASCOM
5 3 15 6 20 20 15 13 8 10 21 27 31 15 15 7 21 15 15 15 11 11 7 13 13 24
Jan 42 Mar 42 Apr 42 Jun 42 Aug 42 Aug 42 Oct 42 Dec Jan Jan Apr Apr May Aug Aug Sep Sep Nov Nov Nov Jan Jan Feb Feb Feb Mar 42 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 44 44 44 44 44 44
Base Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 established Base Sections 5 (Adelaide) and 6 established Base Section 7 established Detachment of 2d Port Headquarters arrived Port Moresby U. S. Advanced Base established at Port Moresby U. S. Advanced Sub-Base established at Milne Bay Combined Operational Service Command in Australian New Gui nea established Port Detachment E established at Oro Bay Base Section 5 (Adelaide) discontinued Base Section 6 discontinued Sub-Bases A and B established Sub-Base C established Sub-Base D established U. S. Advanced Base redesignated Advance Section (ADSEC) Sub-Bases A, B, and D redesignated Advance Bases A, B, and D Base Section 5 reestablished at Cairns 23d Port Headquarters established at Lae Headquarters, Intermediate Section (INTERSEC), established Advance Bases A, B, and D redesign&ted Bases A, B, and D and placed under INTERSEC Bases E and F established and placed under ADSEC USASOS Pioneer Task Force No, 1 established Base E transferred to USASOS Pioneer Task Force No. 1 Base Section 5 (Cairns) discontinued USASOS Pioneer Task Force No. 1 discontinued Base E transferred to INTERSEC USASOS Base G Command established temporarily on Goodenough Island Base Section established in Australia Base Section 1, 2, 3, and 7 redesignated Bases 1, 2, 3, and 7 and assigned to Base Section Base Section 4 discontinued USASOS Base G Command redesignated Base G and placed directly under Headquarters, USASOS Base G transferred to INTERSEC 3ase 1 discontinued Array Service Command (ASCOM) established Base H established under INTERSEC Base K Headquarters established temporarily at Hollandia under ASCOM Base K Headquarters transferred to Tacloban under ASCOM Base M Headquarters established temporarily at Hollandia under ASCOM Base M Headquarters transferred to Tacloban under ASCOM Base 3 discontinued Base K Headquarters transferred to USASOS at Tacloban Base M Headquarters transferred to San Fabian under ASCOM Base X established at Manila ASCOM discontinued
- 58
13 13 13 13 15 15 26 1 1 5 11 20 21 23 5 10 16 19 25 26 31 20 7 6 15 1 1 5 5 16 25 15 6 30 23 1 30 23 26 26
Feb Feb Fe"b Feb Fe"b Feb Mar Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr May Jun Jun Jul Jul Jul Jul Aug Sep Oct Oct Nov Nov Nov Nov Jan Jan Fe"b Apr Apr May Jul Nov May May May
45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 47 47 47
Luzon Base Section (LU3SEC) established Base X discontinued Base M transferred, to LUBSEC Base R Headquarters established temporarily at Tacloban Base Section redesignated Australia Base Section (ABSEC) INTiiRSEC redesignated New Guinea Base Section (MJGSEC) Base S Headquarters established temporarily at Tacloban LUBSEC discontinued Philippine Base Sec (PHIBSEC) established Base T Headquarters established temporarily at Tacloban Base Q, Headquarters established temporarily at Tacloban Base X reestablished Base M Headquarters transferred to San Fernando Base R Headquarters transferred to 3atangas 3ase S Headquarters transferred to Cebu City Base Q, Headquarters and Base T Headquarters disbanded at Tacloban without assignment Base X discontinued a second time Bases 2 and 7 discontinued Base A discontinued Base X reestablished a second time Island Command, Okinawa, transferred from Pacific Ocean Areas to ASCOM-I, AFWESPAC HUGSEC discontinued Bases B, D, and E discontinued PHIBSEC discontinued ASCOM-I redesignated Okinawa Base Command (OBASCOM) Base R redesignated Sub-Base X and placed under Base X Base S redesignated Sub-Base K and placed under Base K Sub-Base X redesignated Sub-Base R Sub-Base redesignated Sub-Base S ABSEC redesignated Australian Base Command (ABCOM) Base G discontinued Sub-Base S discontinued Base H discontinued Base F discontinued Philippine Base Command (PHIBCOM) established OBASCOM redesignated Ryukyus Command (BYCOM) ABCOM discontinued Base X discontinued a third time PHIBCOM absorbed by Headquarters, Philippines-Hyukyus Command. Sub-Base R discontinued
This chronology, which contains only a few items selected from later
pages of this chapter to illustrate problems in terminology, refers to
thirteen kinds of commands. Regarding the terminology of these commands
the following preliminary observations may be made:
5 " . 9
"Port headquarters" and "port detachment" were misnomers, to an ex tent that will not be realized without detailed explanation.
"Base command" was applied to (l) the Okinawa Base Command, 15 Octo ber 1945 - 1 July 1946; (2) the Australian Base Command, 16 Janu ary - 30 November 1946; (3) the Philippine Base Command, 23 May
1946 - 26 May 1947.
"Base section" was applied to (l) the seven U. S. Army service head quarters in the several Australian ports, 5 January 1942 - 1 June
1944; (2) the single U. S. Army service headquarters for all Aus tralia, designated Base Section, 1 June 1944 - 15 February 1945;
(3) the Luzon Base Section, 13 February - 31 March 1945, the New
Guinea 3ase Section, 15 February - 20 August 1945, the Australia
Base Section, 15 February 1945 - 16 January 1946, and the Philip pine Base Section, 1 April - 6 October 1945
"Advanced base" was applied to (l) U. S. Advanced Base, 20 August
1942 - 15 August 1943; (2) three U. S. Army service headquarters
in New Guinea ports, 15 Augast - 15 November 1943.
"Base" was applied to (l) seven U. S. Army service headquarters in
New Guinea, 15 November 1943 - 30 April 1946: (2) four TJ. S. Army
service headquarters in Australia, 1 Jun 1944 - 19 July 1945; (3)
seven U. S. Army service headquarters in the Philippines, 16 Sep tember 1944 - 26 May 1947.
"Sub-base" was applied to (l) four U. S. Army service headquarters
in New Guinea, 21 April - 15 August 1943; (2) various small U. S.
Army service headquarters in Australia and the Philippines, each
subordinate to a larger local U. S. Army service headquarters.
"Advanced sub-base" was applied to U. S. Advanced Sub-Base (Milne
Bay), 20 August 1942 - 21 April 1943, and (perhaps informally) to
other New Guinea headquarters during the same period.
"Advance section" was applied only to Advance Section (in New Gui nea) , 15 August 1943 - 1 March 1944, apparently coordinate with
headquarters then contemplated that were established as Inter mediate Section (New Guinea), 15 November 1943 - 15 February 1945,
and Base Section (Australia), 1 June 1944 - 15 February 1945.
"Army Service Command" referred to a temporary U. S. Army service
headquarters designed to operate, and operating, under a tactical
command and not under the services of supply.
Combined Operational Service Command, USASOS Pioneer Task Force No.
1, and USASOS Base G Command were unique in the theater.
All these terms, as used in the Southwest Pacific Area, will be in
Gl
Bases In Australia
In effect the first U. S. Army base in Australia was established at
Brisbane on 3 January 1942, when Headquarters, USFIA, removed to Melbourne,
leaving at Brisbane Headquarters Detachment, USFIA (set up by General Order
No. 6, Headquarters, USFIA, on 24 December 1941). On 5 January 1942 Gen eral Order No. 1, Headquarters, USAPIA, established Base Sections 1 (Dar win), 2 (Townsville), 3 (Brisbane), and 4 (Melbourne), and Operational
Base No. 1 (Soerabaja, Java, abandoned in February 1942). The commanding
officers of the four base sections were charged with control of all U # S.
troops and supplies within their sections, and of such facilities as were
allocated to the U. S. Army by Australia. Organization of base section
headquarters at Townsville and Brisbane was completed on 13 January 1942.
On 3 March 1942, by General Order No. 20, Headquarters, USAFIA, Base
Sections 5 (Adelaide) and 6 (Perth) were established, and it was directed
that base section commanders (l) "provide for the quartering, administra tion, supply, hospitalization, and evacuation of all United States troops
received in, or assigned to, their respective area," (2) "receive all United
States supplies arriving at their ports,11 and store and distribute these in
accordance with instructions issued by Headquarters, USAPIA, and (3) route
all communications with the War Department through Headquarters, USAFIA.
Each base section included one port and other installations. It was desired
that base section commanders, in addition to their other duties, act as
port commanders, and that the staffs of the ports act also as staffs of
the base sections. Fort headquarters were to be organized according to T/0
10-260-1; pending the arrival of a complete port headquarters or portion
thereof, the port commanders were to assign available personnel to key
- 62
on the east by the 138th meridian and on the south by a line from Broome
to 21 S, 138 B. Base Sections 2 and 3 constituted Queensland, divided
Base Sections 5 and 6 constituted
(Slight changes in
the rest of Australia, divided at the 129th meridian. some of these boundaries were made later.)
- 63
policies and specific orders issued by the Chief of Transportation, Head quarters, USAFIA*
8. In dealing with the several technical and supply staff members
listed in Paragraph 7c, the Base Section Commander will not interfere with
the technical and operational instructions issued by the Chiefs of Services,
Headquarters, United States Army Forces in Australia, ...
10. The base Section Commander has administrative control over and
responsibility for, all service troops, not assigned to a tactical organ ization, within his base section. The term service troops includes per sonnel of units of any branch of the services assigned to the base section,
port and camp overhead.
The authority of the Chief of Transportation Service in base sections
was clarified by General Order No. 40, Headquarters, USAFIA, issued on the
same date and containing the following:
In general, a Regulating Officer and a Superintendent of Army Transport
Service will be assigned to each Base Section Headquarters, on the staff
of the Base Section Commander, They and their assistants will receive
technical and operational instructions directly from the Chief of Trans portation Service, who, through these representatives at each Base Sec tion, will move and ship troops, supplies, and equipment as ordered. The
type of transportation to be used for such movements or shipments will be
selected by the Chief of Transportation Service and not by the Base Sec tion Commander.4
On 16 July 1942 General Order No. 76, Headquarters, USAFIA, rescinded
General Order No. 38 of 15 April 1942 and made minor changes in the boun daries of Base Sections 1-7# Most of the language of General Order No. 38
- 64
- 65
made in regard to "subordinate headquarters" of USASOS, which had been estab lished in New Guinea.
In late 1943 a sweeping change was made in the organization of at least
three base sections. Available documents are not adequate to make clear the
-66
purpose, the dates, and the authority for these changes, and confusion
is increased by apparent contradictions among documents. These difficul ties require statement in chronological order.
(1) On 2 September 1943 a regulation concerning the mission, organ
movement, air transportation, rail transportation, and troop movement sec tions. The document is signed H C. S. Maclntyre Lt Col TC Base Port Commander."
- 67
Section 3, but its use of the term "Base Port Command" is probably the
earliest occurring in records consulted in the preparation of this study,
(3) A letter of Headquarters, USASOS, 19 October 1943, subject:
Reorganization of Base Section, amended by a letter of 24 October 1943,
subject: Base Section Reorganization, directed base sections to reorganize
in accordance with a chart showing a base section organized into a base
port command, a base service command, and one or more base area commands*
No copy of either letter has been found, but the following explanation of
the new system was given in a USASOS letter addressed to chiefs of all
sections in Headquarters, USASOS, on 25 October 1943:
3 ,&. The primary function of the heads of Base Technical and supply
services is command of their respective services, their special staff
functions being incidental and secondary to their operating functions.
The several services concerned are grouped in a Base Service Command, the
Commander of which is the directing head of a completely integrated and
correlated Base Service*
J t > . The new Port Command organization is similar to the Base Service
Command organization in that the Port Commander likewise is the head of a
completely integrated and correlated Base Transportation service,
. The new Base Area Command provides for grouping of camps, sta tions, and staging areas and replacement depots under a Base Area Commander,
More than one Base Area Command may be organized when necessary to provide
for proper administration of widely separated localities, ,..
6. Base Sections One, Four and Five are to operate with skeleton
organizations of the type prescribed above in order to provide the basis
for any expansion that may be necessary in the future,^
(4) Base Section 7 (Sydney) was reorganized in October 1943 into a
base port command and a base service command; a base area command is not
mentioned. Staff Memorandum No. 76, Base Section 3, 28 October 1943, sub
ject: Reorganization Base Section Three, effective 1 November 1943, estab lished in Base Section 3 (Brisbane) a base port command, a base service
command, and two base area commands (Brisbane and Rockh&mpton)# Base
- 68
(5)
ters, USASOS, stated that the Chief Transportation Officer, "after consulta tion or communication with the appropriate section or base commander,11 would
designate in sections or bases (l) a transportation officer, (2) officers
for a water transport section, a land transport section, a troop and cargo
movement section, and a supply section, and, (3) when required, "construc ting officers." Transportation officers and their assistants would receive
ancy between this regulation and the status of the base sections reorganized
under the three-command system is not explained.
In spite of the revised Regulations No. 60-5, it seems safe to de scribe the system established at Brisbane on 1 November 1943 as represent ing, in outline, the system established at Townsville and Sydney. The
889954O50
eral, the Chaplain, the Finance Officer, the Inspector General, the Judge
Advocate, and the War Bonds and Insurance Officer functioned for the entire
base section and were coordinated by the Executive Officer. All communica tions to higher or equal headquarters, originating within any of the com mands, were to be prepared without signature and submitted to the Adjutant
General for dispatch. Under the Base Port Commander and Transportation
Officer, as announced on 8 November 1943, were a Water Division, a Land
Division (with Hail, Air, and Motor sections), a Movement Office (with Cargo
Movement and Troop Movement sections), a Supply Division, a Purchasing and
Contracting Section, and a Baggage Section. An organization chart of 6
November 1943 shows these divisions, an Assistant for Operations and an
Administrative Officer, and also a Labor Pool (containing the 323d and 324th
Quartermaster Boat Companies), as well as a smaller transportation office
in thefiockhamptonArea.14
No comment on the implications of these changes is found. It seems
safe, however, to assert that direct communication was not permitted between
the Chief Transportation Officer, USASOS, and the Base Port Commander and
Transportation Officer, Base Section 3. The system at Townsville and
70
Sydney may have "been the same, but available records do not settle the
question,
A further change was made on 1 January 1944 when motor vehicles and
their operating personnel were directed to " b e assigned in each base to a
separate Motor Command, independent of the port commander and responsible
only to the base section commander. A Base Motor Command was established
at Melbourne 4 February 1944, at Brisbane 15 February 1944, at Sydney 16
February, and at Townsville 24 March.15 The Base Motor Command at Mel
- 71
lished at Cairns on 7 September 1943, had again been discontinued on 7 Feb ruary 1944. 18
By General Order Ho. 65, Headquarters, USASOS, 4 May 1944, effective
1 June 1944, Base Section, USASOS, was established with headquarters at
Brisbane; Base Sections 1 (Darwin), 2 (fownsville), 3 (Brisbane), and 7
(Sydney) were redesignated Bases 1, 2, 3, and 7 respectively without change
in personnel or organization; and Base Section 4 (Melbourne) was discontinued,
its properties and personnel passing to the control of the Commanding Gen eral, Base 7. Brig. Gen. William H. Donaldson, Jr., was appointed Command On 1 June 1944 at least eleven headquarters
GHQ,, Allied Land Forces, Allied Naval Forces,
Allied Air Forces, US.AFFE, USASOS, Sixth Army, Fifth Air Force, 14th Anti aircraft Command, Base Section, and Base 3. All these headquarters except
the last two were transferred to Hollandia, Hew Guinea, on or before 8
September 1944. Australia had become a rear area within little more than
three months, and Base Section was a rear-area command of USASOS. It should
- 72
"be t o m e in mind that Advance Headquarters, USASOS and GB, had teen estab lished in ITew Guinea more than a year "before the main headquarters were
transferred.19
The functions of Base Section included command of all USASOS troops
on the Australian mainland; inspection, supervision, and control of all
administrative and service functions of the four bases, provision for their
requirements, and "coordination of base tasks in support of combat opera tions"; supervision in Australia of evacuation, salvage activities, dis position of supplies and equipment, and Bed Cross and recreational activi ties; "the necessary overall surveillance of transportation activities to
insure that ports are built up to their required capacities, effectively
and efficiently operated daily to the full capacity required, and that
timely steps are taken through proper channels to distribute the total load
in such a manner as to avoid congestion or idleness at any port11; and var ious other functions. All the functions mentioned pertained also to Inter mediate Section, USASOS, with respect to New Guinea. Other functions,
- 73
By 15 September 1944
Total
372
3,286
11,038
4.034
18,730
These troops formed slightly more than 9 percent of the total of 206,000
USASOS troops in the theater on 15 September 1944.
Base 1 (Darwin) had been disbanded as a USASOS organization on 9
July 1944, when its installations were transferred to the Far East Air
Force. Base 3 (Brisbane) was absorbed by Headquarters, Base Section, on
- 74
August and September but moved back again in December and January.
It was
than thirteen months after the establishment of Base Section, the USASOS AWESPAC organization in Australia had been reduced to Headquarters, ABSEC,
and the Offices of the Army Representatives at Townsville, Brisbane, Mel 21
bourne, Adelaide, and Perth.
ABSEC, thus reduced, survived somewhat more than seventeen months.
It was redesignated as the Australian Base Command (ABCOM) on 16 January
1946. 3rig. Gen. William H. Donaldson, in command since June 1944, was
1946 to 61 on 30 June. During the first six months of 1946 ABCOM shipped
228,019 measurement tons of Army supplies from Australia, leaving a balance
22
of 47,468 tons to be shipped out.
- 75
- 76
Coast Artillery (Antiaircraft), the 699th Signal Reporting Company, and the
5th Station Hospital, in addition to Headquarters, Base Section 6. The
total strength of these units on 30 May 1942 was 2,187 officers, men, and
nurses. By 6 November the strength of the section had dwindled to 25, and
- 77
this division departed for the north on 28 July 1942. Provision was made
on 17 June 1942 for a regulating officer and an assistant regulating officer
at Alice Springs, the northern terminus of a railway connecting with a
highway through the desert center of Australia to Darwin (to check American
cargo on this Australian-operated route); but the need for this rail-highway
project gradually decreased.*5
Base Section 5, inactivated at Adelaide on 8 January 1943, was reestab lished at Cairns, Queensland, on 7 September 1943, to handle heavy move ments which temporarily overflowed the facilities at Townsville (Base Sec tion 2). Within five months the volume of traffic was sufficiently reduced
to permit the return of this base section to the control of the Commanding
General, Base Section 2. Cairns had the advantage of being considerably
closer to New Guinea than any other available port was, but full develop 27
ment of its facilities was not found necessary.
Two other bases, Darwin and Melbourne, were of decreasing use as the
war progressed. Darwin (Base Section l) was originally developed for Army
use as the port in Australia that was nearest to the Netherlands East
Indies and the Philippines. It was raided by the Japanese on 19 February
1942, with a loss of some 225 lives, and it suffered about 50 raids later
in 1942. In consequence most of the units and offices of the base section
were removed to Birdum and Adelaide River (not to be confused with the city
of Adelaide, about 900 miles distant). As late as 14 June 1943 the naviga tion of the harbor was impeded by 13 sunken ships, and a 700-foot wharf,
- 78
The desert
- 79
attack. Melbourne was the headquarters of several agencies of the Common wealth Government. For these reasons Melbourne was selected as the head quarters of General MacArthur, 21 March - 20 July 1942, and of USAFIA and
USASOS, January - September 1942. The 41st Infantry Division arrived at
Melbourne 6 April 1942 and went into training at Camp Seymour, about seventy
miles to the north. A disadvantage of Melbourne, increasingly felt during
1942, was its remoteness from New Guinea. following approximate mileages: Water Melbourne - Sydney Sydney - Brisbane Brisbane - Townsville Total Hail The disadvantage is shown by the
(The distance from Townsville to Port Moresby by water was about 580 miles.)
The disadvantage of remoteness from the zone of combat was aggravated by
the severe shortage of ships, small craft, railway equipment, and fuel, by
changes of railway gauge at Albury (between Melbourne and Sydney) and at
Brisbane, and by the poor condition of highways and the shortage of trucks.
The landing of personnel and materiel from the United States at Melbourne
for transshipment to New Guinea placed a needless strain on available
transportation facilities. The necessity of shortening the route to New
Guinea was the main reason why Melbourne did not remain after the summer
of 1942 the chief Army base in Australia. considerable quantities of Army traffic.^
Sydney, Brisbane, and Townsville were the ports that shipped most of
the U. S. Army personnel, equipment, and supplies to New Guinea after 1942
and maintained the rear installations necessary for this purpose. The
It continued, however, to handle
- 80
Engineer, Medical, and Ordnance units, arrived at Port Moresby during May
and later. A small medical detachment and Company E of the 46th Engineer
Regiment arrived at Milne Bay on 25 June 1942, and other U. S. forces
followed. Company 3 P of the 46th Engineer Regiment arrived at Merauke,
Dutch New Guinea, in July 1942. Until August 1942 all these forces remained
attached to Base Section 2.^0
By General Order No. 7, Headquarters, USASOS, 11 August 1942, effec tive 20 August, U. S. Advanced Base, New Guinea, was established with head quarters at Port Moresby, under the command of Col. Albert G. Matthews.
The Commanding Officer, Advanced Base, was charged with receiving all TJ. S.
troops and supplies and commanding U. S. service troops in New Guinea. The
U. S. Army forces at Milne 3ay were organized as an advance sub-base com manded by Col. Prank L. ^urns. Responsibility for supplying U. S. forces
in New Guinea was transferred on 12 August from Base Section 2 to Base Sec tion 3 (Brisbane).
Instructions issued on 12 August 1942 by USASOS to the Commanding
Officer, Advanced Base, notified him that all Australian and U. S. Army,
Navy, and Air Forces serving in Australian New Guinea were designated as
- 81
the New Guinea Force, and that the General Officer Commanding Allied Land
Forces in Australian New Guinea was designated as Commander, New Guinea
Force. This officer (an Australian) was not to disturb the execution of
plans of the Commanding Officer, Advanced Base, except when attack was
imminent or in progress. Normal routine instructions from Headquarters,
USASOS, would be routed direct to the Commanding Officer, Advanced Base;
and the Commander, New Guinea Force, would deal through the Commanding
Officer, Advanced Base, in all matters affecting TJ. S. Army service troops
(except Air Force troops) in Australian New Guinea. The Commander, New
Guinea Force, was authorized to make "geographical sub-divisions of his com mand," in each of which the Commanding Officer, Advanced Base, was to appoint
a local USASOS commander. Supply by water from Australia was charged to the
Allied Land Forces for Australian units and to USASOS for U S. Army units
(including Air Force). Each command, Allied Land Forces and USASOS, would
operate its own transportation and supply service and maintain its own port
organizations, except that in ports handling little traffic one or the other
of the commands could arrange by mutual agreement to take over the whole
responsibility. The coordination of separate ports was a responsibility
of the Commander, New Guinea Force. Cargo capacities of ships under con trol of either command were to be utilized as much as possible in serving
both Australian and U. S. forces. Merauke, being outside Australian New
Guinea, was not subject to the Commander, New Guinea Force, Supplement ary instructions of 27 August provided that a military port authority would
be designated in each port by the Commander, New Guinea Force, and that
the latter would control movements.
These arrangements were modified by instructions from GHQ, dated 5
- 82
Combined Operational Service Command was organized in the following sec tions: Supply and Transportation, Ordnance, Engineer Construction, Medi
cal, Small Ships, and AHGAU (Australian New Guinea Administrative Unit, a
part of the Australian Army, responsible for the employment and care of
native Hew Guinea labor). In each of these, except AHGAU, representatives
Brig. Gen. Dwight F.
- 83
The New Guinea bases of the U. S. Army were nominally local commands of
the Combined Operational Service Command, but actually bases under U. S.
Advanced Base, USASOS. The Combined Operational Service Command was dis
22a
continued in or about April 1943,
Additional U. S. service forces arrived in Port Moresby and Milne
Bay and also in Oro Bay and Goodenough Island. USASOS personnel arrived
vanced Base was evidently Lt. Col. Charles S. Maclntyre, who on 22 July
1943 was awarded the Legion of Merit
for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding
services as Transportation Officer, Advanced Base, Southwest Pacific Area,
from 16 September 1942 to 15 April 1943. Lieutenant Colonel Maclntyre was
charged with the operation of all Transportation Corps facilities and agencies,
both by water and by motor, of the Advanced Base. He planned, organized and
supervised all Army Transportation Service .activities and coordinated them
with those of the Australian forces. With very limited facilities and under
exceptionally difficult conditions, he accomplished the discharge and load ing of ships. Throughout the period, Lieutenant Colonel Maclntyre worked
without regard to time or his ov/n physical limitations. By his expert knowl edge of transportation procedures, by his energy and his leadership, he made
an important contribution to the support of the combat operations.
- 84
889954 O50
the procedure that was developing in New Guinea for the establishment of
new USASOS bases. The first landing on an enemy shore and the conquest of
enemy forces in the adjacent areas were the responsibility of a task force,
which included service troops. The task force commander was initially
responsible for all service and supply functions in the occupied area and
for transportation from the nearest established USASOS base. At a later
stage in the occupation the responsibility for transportation to and from
the area was transferred to USASOS, but all service troops remained under
the command of the task force commander. When the task force or its ele ments went forward on a new mission, USASOS took over whatever service
elements and functions were left behind and, if necessary, established a
in
base and assigned these elements and functions to the base commander.'"
By General Order No, 73, Headquarters, USASOS, 14 November 1943,
effective 15 November, Headquarters, Advance Section, was transferred to
Lae; Bases 1 (Lae) and P (Finschhafen) were established and were placed
under control of Advance Section; all USASOS units, establishments, and
activities previously under control of Advance Section were transferred
to Intermediate Section, established on the same date with headquarters
at Port Moresby; and Advance Bases A, B, and D were redesignated Bases A
(Milne Bay), B (Oro Bay), and D (Port Moresby). The functions and respon
- 86
On 1 March 1944 Base F was transferred to Intermediate Section, and Head qtiarters, Advance Section, was closed.38 On 1 June 1944 Brigadier General
- 87
- 88
with responsibility for operating the ADSOS fleet, assigning harbor craft
in lew Guinea and maintaining harbor craft records, assigning key personnel
to the bases and maintaining personnel records, supervising maintenance
and repair of all vessels assigned to operation in the New Guinea aree,
supervising port operations in that area, and supervising TC supply. The
original transportation functions of the Intermediate Section were advance
planning and port operations, control and operation of all craft specific ally assigned to bases, and supervision of port operations and "surveillance
of Transportation Corps activities within the bases.*
The original transportation staff in nTTEHSEC headquarters consisted
of Col. Fred M. Fogel, Transportation Officer; Maj. George T. Wright,
Operations Officer; llaj. C. S. Freeman, Control Officer; Oapt. B. T. Pevear,
Small Ships Officer; Capt. B. W. Heaphy, Tanker Officer; 1st Lt. G. W. Ema,
Administration Officer; and 1st Lt. J. M. Moskwa, Maintenance and Repair
Officer.
On 24 February 1944 and subsequently till January 1945, the transpor tation staff of Intermediate Section consisted of Colonel i'ogel, Transpor tation Officer (relieved in November 1944 by Lt. Col. George T. Vright);
Lt. Col. George P. Bradford, Deputy Transportation Officer (relieved by
Lt. Col. Albert B. Camp, later by Maj. George T. Wright); Maj. George T.
Wright, Operations and Executive Officer, and Maj. E." M. Wegman, Operations
Officer (one or both relieved by Maj. C. S. Freeman, Executive Officer,
and Capt. A. G. Prince, Operations Officer); Maj. C. S. Freeman, Control
Officer; and 2nd Lt. G. Spens, Harbor Craft Officer. A Supply Depot Oper ations Section was established under Lt. Col. Morton E. Townes, and a Unit
Training Program under Lt. Col. H. E. Jeeter. In January 1945 the staff
- 89
and I Corps, observed the first landing and subsequent operations at Hol landia. It ;vas dissolved on 7 June 1944, when Base G .was established with
under control of Base Section (established 1 June 1944); plans for Philip pine operations were far advanced; and Headquarters, U S A S O S , was transferred
from Brisbane to Hollandia on 8 September 1944. The further transfer of
- 90
Section and Intermediate Section, and the fact that New Guinea had joined
Australia as a rear area, were indicated when the two sections were re designated, without change of function, as Australia 3ase Section (ABS2C)
and New Guinea Base Section (NUG5EC).41 Maj. Gen. Clarence L. Sturdevant,
The closing of the Hew Guinea bases was accomplished within fifteen
months of the designation of NUGSEC. By a series of general orders issued
by AFW3SPAC between 27 June and 17 August 1945, Headquarters, 1I17GS3C, was
discontinued on 20 August 1945; Headquarters and Headquarters Company,
NUGSSC, moved to Manila and was discontinued; Base A (Milne Bay) was dis continued on 25 July 1945 and its personnel was transferred to Base X for
attachment to 5th Camp Battalion; Bases B (Oro 3ay), D (Port Moresby), and
E (Lae) were discontinued on 7 September 1945, and their personnel, equip ment, and functions were transferred to Headquarters, AM2SPAC; and Bases
F, Gf and H were instructed to report directly to Headquarters, API/ESP AC,
"on all matters." A Transportation Officer, New Guinea (TONG), was estab lished at Biak on 10 July 1945 to operate the New Guinea fleet, but was
witndrawn on 17 August, after which date the transportation officers in
the New Guinea bases reported directly to the Chief of Transportation,
Headquarters, AIWESPAC. Base G (Hollandia) was discontinued 25 January
- 91
- 92
on 25 December 1944, when Eighth Army relieved Sixth Army of tactical duties
and missions in the Leyte-Samar Area. Personnel of Base M arrived in Lin gayen Gulf on 13 January 1945. Base M opened at San Fabian on 16 January,
assumed control of service operations in Lingayen Gulf on 19 January, and
established Sub-Bases 1 (^hite Beach), 2 (Dagupan), and 3 (Port Sual).
(Headquarters, Base M, was removed to San Fernando on 21 April 1945.) On
28 January ASCOM announced plans for developing a base at Manila and organ izing a transportation command to operate all railway, long-distance high way, and water transportation in Luzon. Base X was established at Manila
on 29 January, and Headquarters, ASCOM, was removed to Manila. ASCOM itself
44
- 93
Manila Area did not constitute a base command or other form of single admin istrative entity; a separate base headquarters to administer the three
Manila commands was not considered necessary. Operations of the ports in
LUBSEC were coordinated and supervised by a Deputy Commander for Port Oper ations (Col. Edward M. Grimm), acting for the Commanding General, LUBSEC;
and operations of the supply and service installations in the Manila Area
were coordinated and controlled by a Deputy Commander for Service Opera tions, who also provided information relative to the status of supply
- 94
- 95
- 96
for the occupation of Japan, to take effect after the success of OLYMPIC
and COBOHET. After V-J Day the two units were redesignated ASCOM-6 and
ASCOM-8 to support the Sixth and Eighth Armies occupying Japan, the appli cable parts of OLYMPIC and COEONET were consolidated with BLACKLIST, and
ASCOM-24 was organized for the logistical support of XXIV Corps in Korea.
The operations of these ASCOM units lie outside the Southwest Pacific Area
and are not further considered in this study.47
Por eight months after the discontinuance of PHIBSEC the Philippine
bases were supervised directly by Headquarters, AIWESPAC. On 1 November
1945, Headquarters, Bases E (Batangas) and S (Cebu City), were redesig nated as Sub-Bases X and K respectively, under the operational and admini strative control of the commanding officers, Bases X and K. Sub-Bases X and K were redesignated as Sub-Bases E and S. On 5 November
Sub-Base S was
half of 1946 supply points were closed in Morotai, Negros, Panay, Davao
48
Mindoro, Zamboanga, and Agusan.
By General Order No. 145, Headquarters, AIWESPAC, 23 May 1946, effec tive 1 June, Headquarters, Base X, was redesignated as Headquarters, Phil ippine Base Service Command (PHIBCOM). By Administrative Order No. 6,
Headquarters, AFV/ESPAC, 18 May 1946, effective 1 July, logistic responsi bility for the whole of the Philippine Islands area was assigned to PHIBCOM,
and Bases M and K were relieved of all supply responsibilities except for
personnel and U. S. property within their own limits. Base M, Base K, and
PHIBCOM appear in an AMESPAC organization chart of June 1946 as coordinate
- 97
port for all elements of the Tenth Army in the Byukyu Archipelago; to exe cute a base development plan prescribed by the Commander in Chief and the
Commanding General, Pacific Ocean Areas; to garrison and defend all areas
on Okinawa and outlying islands as progressively assigned to the Island
Command; and to command all Army, Navy, and Marine garrison forces assigned
to the Command. The main body of Island Command troops went ashore in
Okinawa on 1 April 1945, The Command delivered cargo and personnel, built
and maintained roads, bridges, airfields, and piers, constructed ware houses and hospitals, controlled traffic, fed, housed, and clothed the
forces on Okinawa, maintained and repaired vehicles and other equipment,
administered prisoners of war and enemy civilians, and cared for the sick
- 98
1945, and thereafter the Island Command was responsible for practically
all the defense (except antiaircraft) of the islands.50
On 31 July 1945 the Tenth Army with assigned and attached units, includ ing the U. S. Army forces of the island commands of Okinawa and Ie Shiaa,
was transferred from control of Admiral Nimitz, Commander in Chief, Pacific
Ocean Area, to dontrol of General MacArthur, Commander in Chief, Army Forces,
Pacific. Tenth Army 'became an administrative and tactical command report The Island Commands of Okinawa and Ie
tical missions previously assigned to Tenth Army, the imposition on remain ing Japanese of the execution of the agreed surrender terms, and provision
- 99
for ground defense and internal security in the Ryukyus. On the same date
Maj. Gen. Fred 0. Wallace was succeeded in command by Brig. Gen. Lawrence
A. Lawson. On 1 July 1946 Okinawa Base Command was redesignated Byukyus
Command (BTCOM). When AFWESFAC was redesignated on 1 January 1947 as the
Philippine-Ryukyus Command (PHILRTCOM), it retains PHIBCOM and ETCOM as
territorial commands.0*5
Port Headquarters
Port headquarters in the Southwest Pacific Area were only nominally
transportation organizations "before the latter part of 1945. They were
other sources were not available. Port headquarters were most often em ployed as the equivalent of base headquarters. After August 1945 they were
confined to port operations but were not trained organizations which kept
a substantial continuity of personnel and equipment. They were of four
kinds port detachments, major ports, medium ports, and port commands.
was transferred to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2d Port of Embar kation. Port Detachment A was reestablished on 26 October 1942 at Portland
Boads, Queensland, where it served as Headquarters, Subsection 2, Base
Section 2 (Townsville). Its function was "to operate and administrate
ports of smaller size than ports of embarkation and debarkation" and "to
furnish the necessary facilities of a smaller area, on a more or less emer gency basis.11 On 9 September 1943 Port Detachment A was assigned to Base
Section 5 (Cairns), within which it served as Headquarters, Base Area Com mand Ho. 2 (Portland Roads). It was transferred to Townsvllle on 14 Decem
ber 1943, and its personnel was absorbed in Base Section 2. A Port Detach ment A was constituted as Headquarters, Base H (Biak), on 13 August 1944;
its personnel was transferred to Base H on 20 August. No further reference
to this detachment is found.
53
889954 050
ently, 12 officers and 150 enlisted men commanded by Maj. Douglas S. Mapes
(formerly constituting Port Detachment A) were assigned to Port Detachment
D to operate the port of Port Moresby. By June 1943 the detachment was at
and funds of Port Detachment D were transferred to Headquarters, Base Sec tion 5, on 15 November 1943, and the detachment was transferred without
personnel and equipment to Headquarters, Base Section 3 (Brisbane).
Port Detachment E was activated at Camp Darley, Victoria, 20 July 1942.
- 102
lished and operated at Milne Bay a plant known as "Little Detroit" for
assembling motor vehicles. The detachment was later redesignated as the
as Headquarters and Headquarters Company, New York Port Headquarters (Em barkation), on 10 February 1941, was redesignated as Headquarters and Head quarters Company, 2d Port of Embarkation, by order of 17 February 1942,
sailed from San Francisco for Townsville on 22 April 1942, and landed at
Adelaide with the 32d Division on 14 May 1942. The 22d and 23d Ports were
- 103
activated in Australia on 1 August 1942, apparently at Melbourne and Dar win respectively.59 The three ports were organized under T/O 10-260-1,
General Order No. 38, 31 July 1942, the type of organization designated as
Port Headquarters (TJO 10-260-1) was transferred from the Quartermaster
Corps to the Transportation Corps and was redesignated Port Headquarters,
Transportation Corps (T/O 55-100-1).60 The transfer was given effect in
the Southwest Pacific Area by General Order No. 36, Headquarters, USASOS,
effective 13 November 1942, which redesignated the Headquarters and Head quarters Companies, 2d, 22d, and 23d Port of Embarkation (T/O 10-260-1),
as Headquarters and Headquarters Companies, 2d, 22d, and 23d Port Headquar ters, TC (T/O 55-100-1). At an unknown date, apparenL:.^ in 1943, these
were redesignated in the theater as 2d, 22d, and 23d Headquarters Companies,
Port (Mobile). On 30 April 1944 they were again redesignated as Headquar
ters and Headquarters Companies, 2d, 22d, and 23d Ports, TC, and were re organized according to T/O&E 55-110-1, Headquarters and Headquarters Company,
Major Port (Overseas), dated 20 November 1943, which established an organ ization of 109 officers, 1 warrant officer, and 409 enlisted men (total
519), to which port marine maintenance units, port battalions and companies,
harbor craft companies, amphibian truck companies, and other units would
be attached. On 30 August 1945 the Chief of Transportation, AIW1SPAC,
- 104
remarked that as recently as July 1945 "not one single organized port ex isted in the theater," that the grades and ratings of the three "major ports"
credited to the theater had been "utilized to form various headquarters,"
and that "the groups attempting to operate the ports were simply individuals
gathered together and directed to run the ports." The 2d Major Port absorbed
the Port Command, Base X (Manila) , on 10 August 1945 and gradually became
an "organized port." The Headquarters and Headquarters Companies, 22d and
23d Ports, TC, were inactivated at Manila on 15 October 1945, and their
personnel was assigned to Headquarters, AFWESPAC, for reassignment.
As already mentioned, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 22d Port
of Embarkation, was activated 1 August 1942, apparently at Melbourne. On
1943 this organization was once more redesignated as Base Section 4; all
personnel, equipment, and unit funds of 22d Port Headquarters were trans ferred to Headquarters, Base Section 4; and the 22d Port Headquarters was
transferred without personnel and equipment to Sub-Base 3 (Oro Bay), where
it replaced Port Detachment B as headquarters of the base. The personnel,
equipment, and funds of 22d Port Headquarters were transferred to Headquar ters, Base B, on 15 November 1943, when the 22d Port Headquarters was
transferred without personnel a"d equipment to Base F (Finschhafen), where
it again operated as headquarters of the base. The 22d Port Headquarters
- 105
62
mentioned above, on 15 October 1945.
Headquarters and Headquarters Conroany, 23d Port of Embarkation, as
already mentioned, was activated on 1 August 1942, probably ?t Darwin. On
5 August 1943 the 23d Port Headquarters was transferred from Darwin to Oro
3ay (scheduled for Lae) rnd Port Detechment C was transferred from Oro Bay
to Darwin, both without personnel and equipment, and the personnel and
equipment of each organization were transferred to the other. Headquarters
- 106
port headquarters was transferred without personnel and equipment to Head quarters, Base Section 3 (Brisbane), of which the Commanding Officer was
designated as Commanding Officer, 2d Port Headquarters, TC, in addition to
his other duties. On 28 March 1944 2d Port Headquarters was transferred
with the latter part of 1944 because it appears that most of the units were
inactive thereafter. Dates ( _ i f c j y 42)- 12 Aug 42* 6 Jun 42 - 26 Jul 42 ( Jul 42)- 12 Aug 42* 26 Jul 42 - 12 Aug 42* ( 1 Aug 42)- 7 May 43* ( 1 Aug 42)- 5 Aug 43* 12 Aug 42 - 24 Dec 42* (13 Aug 42 -( - Jun 43) 25 Oct 42 - 14 Dec 43 Unit 2d Port Dtchrat of 2d Port Port Dtchmt B Port Dtchmt A 22d Port 23d rort 2d Port Port Dtchmt D Port Dtchmt A Station Townsville Port Moresby Milne Bay Port Moresby . Melbourne Darwin Port Moresby (Adv. Base; Port Moresby (Sub-3ase) Portland Roads
- 107
13 Dec 4 2 - 7 May 43* 24 Dec 42 - 15 Nov 43* 27 Apr 43 7 May 43 - 15ttov43* ( Jun 43)- 13 ITov 43* 5 Aug 43 - 15 Nov 43* 19 Sep 43 - 14 Nov 44* 15 Nov 43 1 Feb 44 15 Hov 43 - 28 Mar 44 1 Feb 4 4 - 8 Nov 44 7 Jun 44 -(18 Sep 44) 13 Aug 4 4 - 2 0 Aug 44
Port Dtchmt E 2d Port Port Dtchmt B 22d Port Port Ptchmt I1 Port Dtchmt C 23d Port 22d Port 2d Port 22d Port 2d Port Port Dtchmt A
Oro Bay Milne Bay Goodenough Island Oro Bay Cairns Darwin Lae Finschhafen Brisbane Port Moresby Hollandia Biak
unit was temporarily designated as identical with that of a base headquar ters, and later the personnel and equipment of the unit were transferred
to a base commander and the designation of the unit was transferred to
other personnel and equipment. A unit designation was successively applied
- 108
approximately from the middle of 194? till the latter part of 1944. The
policy was adopted "because of a shortage of service personnel in the thea ter and was discontinued after the practices that had developed were other wise provided for in the regulations governing ASCOM.
As further explained by Col. Harry E. Baird, formerly S-l, USAFiTS, "T/Os
set up in the United States were inoperable in SWPA, where no two situations
were the same. SV/PA was a theater of ingenuity, where the most unheard-of
situations had to be met with insufficient means, and with little or no hope
of help from the United States, where emphasis was on ILTO." It was necessary
to "shove in troops and give them a name." Port detachments were devised
to meet part of the needs that developed, and port headquarters were applied
to the same purpose. Soon after the 2d Port Headquarters arrived in the
theater, its Commanding Officer was appointed to command the 4th Replace ment Eepot (Camp Earley), its Judge Advocate was appointed Judge Advocate
of the services of supply headquarters, its Inspector General was appointed
Inspector General in Base 2, and more than half of its other grades end
ratings were reassigned, because of their special qualifications, to a wide
variety of duties. 3y the middle of 1942 the 2d Port Headquarters was a
"paper organization," of which the contents had been removed because no
other source of grades and ratings was available. Charts of unused or
dormant port detachments and port headquarters were hung on a wall, '/hen
need existed for what Col. Floyd S. Fix calls "an accountable unit, some thing to assign people to," one of the charts would be taken down, assign
- 109
merits would be made, and the chart would be filed till the unit that it
designated was again emptied of personnel, v/hen the chart v/ould be hung
up once more in token that the designation was available for future use.
The transfer of a port headquarters or a port detachment was a "paper
movement," not involving physical movement of personnel or equipment. It
command, not as a base headquarters. Discussion of it is therefore post poned to permit its inclusion among the port commands.
Port Commands and Medium Ports
As already shown, the transportation activities in bases were assigned
on 15 April 1942 to two coordinate officers superintendent of Army Transport Service. a regulating officer and a
- 11)
Sydney in October, at Brisbane and Townsville on 1 November, and at Mel bourne on 19 Uovember. Under the reorganization, as'announced at 3risbane,
the base port command consisted of all troops, activities, and installations
of the Transportation Corps within the base and was commended by the base
section transportation officer. The port command was thus, in all respects
It ceased to be so in conse
quence of instructions dated 1 January 1944, which directed the establish ment of a base motor command, coordinate with the other three commands.
The mission of a base port command and of a base motor command was
prescribed by the U5ASOS organization manual on 1 January 1944. according
to a revision dated 15 -august 1944 the mission of a base port command was
"the operation and maintenance of port facilities for the movement of troops,
supplies, and equipment." and a traffic division. The command was to consist of a water division
- Ill
motor command.
The extent to which these reorganizations and redesignations were
actually applied is not entirely clear. Dates for the establishment of
"base port commands in four Australian bases are given above. Dates and
titles of whatever base port commands may have been established in Darwin
and Port Moresby are not found* In Oro Bay a transportation officer had
been appointed in December 1942, under whom were an Army Transport officer,
67
a small ships officer, and a motor transport officer. The title of trans
portation officer at Oro Bay was changed at some time after October 1943 to
base port commander; and a port command existed at Oro Bay by March 1944.
At Milne Bay the transportation officer was redesignated as base port com mander in January 1944. At Lae a base port command was established within
forty-eight hours of 13 September 1943, when the port was captured. During
the next year and a half this organization consisted of a port commander,
his executive officer, a water operations section, a cargo control section,
a troop movement section, a civilian personnel section, a harbor control
section, a transportation supply section, and a maintenance and repair sec tion. There was a separate base motor command. A base port command existed
port command for Base M was established at Tacloban (scheduled for Lingayen
- 112
Gulf) on 15 November 1944, under the Base Port Commander and Transporta tion Officer. The command consisted temporarily of a Coordination Staff
(Port Commander and Executive Officer, Administration and Personnel Di vision, Maritime Personnel Division, '.fater Division, Traffic Division, and
Supply Division) and a Held Operations Section (Stream Operations, Pier
Operations, and Marine Operations). with the base port command. The base motor command was coordinate
landed at San Fabian, Lingayen Gulf, on 11 January 1945 and organized the
base port command for operation on 16 January. The Manila Port Command
was established with the Luzon Base Section on 13 February 1945. Actual
port operations, previously controlled by the 4th Engineer Special Brigade,
were assumed by the Port Command on 3 March 1945; but elements of the 4th
Engineer Special Brigade continued to conduct port operations under the
Port Command, and from 6 to 20 April 1945 the Commanding General, 4th Engi neer Special Brigade, served as Commanding General, Manila Port Command.
The Command consisted of a Water Division, a Port Facilities Division, a
Port Supply Division, a Maritime Personnel Section, an Administrative Di vision, a Control Branch, a Traffic Section, and a Civilian Personnel Di vision. Port operations at 3atangas began on 7 April 1945, and Base P .
assumed control of the port on 27 April. At Cebu City the Port Conmand,
Base S, received control of the harbor from the Ajnerical Division on 15
June 1945. 68
The designation of base port command was altered in all the Philippine
bases in the latter part of 1945, beginning with 10 August, when Headquar ters and Headquarters Company, 2d Major Fort (Overseas) (T/O&S 55-110-1),
was attached to Base X (Manila) and the personnel of the Port Command, Base
- 113
Commanding General, FHIBSEC, explained that the action "does not contem plate any increase or decrease in personnel other than that desired by
your headquarters or is it in any way intended to do more at the present
time than give the port people a unit to which they can belong and in which
they can begin to build up pride and achievement." i a j o r Port (Over The 2d i
seas) was one of the largest port installations in the world, with 11 piers,
capable of discharging 30 Liberty ships simultaneously. The organization
of the port in 1945 is not shown by available records. AJfter a reorganiza tion made in February 1946, when the operations and personnel of the port
had been considerably reduced, the port was commanded by the Port Commander,
under whom was a Deputy Port Commander, with seven special officers (Inspec tor General, Judge Advocate, Provost Marshal, Adjutant General, Intelligence
Officer, Chaplain, and Headquarters Commandant), a director and an Assistant
Director of Port Services, a Director and an Assistant director of Fort
Operations, the 54th TC Service 'Sroup (under an Executive), and the Head quarters Company, follows:
Dir. of Port Services Dir. of Port Operations Special Sv. & Army Exch. Troop Movt. Div. Claims & Contracts . f l aiming Finance Operations Ordnance Port Trans. IIv. Signal Materials-handling Port Mail Officer Equipment Fiscal & Procurement Operations Civilian Employment Motor Army Air Torce 'ater Div. Chemical Stevedore Opns. Engineer Lighterage Surgeon Tanker & PS Quartermaster Accounting & Transportation Supply Statistical 54th TC Sv Grp 47th TC Sv Bn 48th TC Sv 3n 51st TC Sv Bn 119th Port 3n 706th Tank Bn 281st QM Car Co The operating branches were internally organized as
- 114
The motives of this reorganization are not indicated, but the details of
the reorganization show that many or most of the functions of the former
Base Service Command and the former Base Area Command, as described in the
TJSASOS manual in 1944, had been taken over by the Port Commander. In the
Japan and was replaced at Manila by the 670th Medium Port, formerly at
Batangas. During the whole existence of the Manila Port Command and the
2d Major Port at Manila a 3ase Motor Command had controlled most motor trans ... 69
portation.
The 54th TC Service Group, mentioned above, had been activated at
Leyte on 18 March 1945 under command of Col. Marc J. Logie. at Manila 1 April. It arrived
echelon between its subordinate units and base headquarters," charged with
"making necessary personnel and unit adjustments as well as with the super vision of daily routine and the maintenance of a high level of morale within
the command in an effort to increase the efficiency of the port operations."
- 115
70
personnel and equipment from AFWESPAC to XXIV Corps in Korea in March 1946.
The strength of the Manila Port Command anl the 2d Major Port was re 7l
ported as follows (not including attached units after February 1946):
Month 19 4 5 Feb 25
4th ESB 0. EM
Total Military
Civil
EM
ian
Total
Jun
Jul Aug Sep
4,972 5,423
11,719 5,080
4 31 124 112 577 10,136 585 10,668 464 7,380 (13,800) 671 11,080 753 10,255 840 12,227 968 12,488 710 5,644
560 472 3,982 2,535
2 724
7,492 11,021 11,964 14,457 17,600 19,730 22,254 21,683 24,976
37 960
18,205 22,274 19,808 28,257 29,351 30,738 35,321 35,139 31,330
Jan
Feb Mar
Apr May
These figures, compared with those in Appendix 14, show the following ratios
- 116
between the number of personnel in the Manila Port Command (later the 2d
Major Port) and the total number of TC personnel in SWPA:
April 1945 May 1945 June 1945 July 1945 31$ 33$ 29$ 36$ August 1945 September 1945 October 1945 34$ 32$ 41$ Uovember 1945 December 1945 January 1946 February 1946 43$
44$
55$
28$
In other words, nearly a third of all the TC personnel in the theater was
assigned to the Manila Port Command within two months of its establishment,
and the proportion increased till in January 1946 it exceeded half. In
quarters Company, Medium Port (Overseas), 13 May 1944, each with an auth orized strength of 76 officers and 229 enlisted men. The table of organi
X89954O50
in
x 1 1 7 '
on 15 October 1945 were evidently not trained in the United States and
shipped to the theater with related units of a port group, but were estab lished by commanders of the bases concerned, "utilizing personnel from
sources under direct control'1 and requisitioning added personnel and equip ment as required. One source of added personnel may have been the Headquar
ters and Headquarters Companies^ 22d and 23d Ports, inactivated on the same
date. All these medium ports had been preceded by the 53d Medium Port,
which had arrived in Okinawa on 3 May 1945 and had been relieved of attach ment to the 1st Engineer Special Brigade during the same month, receiving
7?
by transfer all units previously assigned to the 1st Engineer Brigade.
Base K Port Command (Tacloban) was discontinued 3 November 1945 and
was succeeded by 668th Medium Port on 4 November. Similar action was taken
1945. Its office and personnel were transferred from Headquarters, OBASCOM,
to Headquarters, 53d Medium Port, on 25 February 1946, and Col. William D.
Schas was appointed as Chief of Transportation, OBASCOM, and Commanding
Officer, 53d Medium Port, on 16 April 1946. The personnel of 670th Medium
Port was transferred to Battery B, 4th Field Artillery Battalion, on 25 May
1946; and the 670th Medium Port was transferred without personnel and equip
- 118
668th, 669th, and 671st Medium Ports were inactivated, and all personnel
of the 668th Medium Port was transferred to the 338th Ordnance Depot Co. 73
These actions left the 670th Medium Port at Manila and the 53d Medium
Port at ITaha, Okinawa, as the only organized ports in the AFVfrJSPAC area.
By October 1946 the work formerly done by medium ports other than these
two was being done by a Base K Port Command at Tacloban (10 officers, 259
enlisted men), a Base M Transportation Section at San Fernando (8 officers,
37 enlisted men), and a Sub-Base B Transportation Section at Batangas (11
officers, 227 enlisted men). On 30 June 1946 Headquarters and Headquarters
Company, 53d Medium Port, TC, was redesignated as Headquarters and Head quarters Company, 53d Small Port, TC. By 12 February 194-7 Headquarters
and Headquarters Company, 52d Medium Port (Philippine Scouts) (18 officers,
1 woxrant officer, 240 enlisted men), had been established under the Trans portation Section, Sub-3ase fi. On 26 May 1947 the 670th Medium Port (65
officers, 1 warrant officer, 3 enlisted men) was assigned to 52d Medium
Port (Philippine Scouts) (10 officers, 211 enlisted men), which was trans ferred from 3atangas to I-iaaila on the same date. On 30 May 1947 the 670th
fore, the only surviving organized port was the 52d Medium Port (Philippine
\ 74
Scouts) at Manila.
- 119
by the Fort Commander, tinder whom were a Deputy Port Commander and an ex ecutive, with five special officers (Piccal Officer, Control Officer, In spector, Judge advocate, and Headquarters Commandant), a Director of Admin istration, a Director of Training, a Director of Operations, and a Director
75
of Supply and Utilities. The branches were organized as follows:
Dir. of Administration Dir. of Staff Service Army jilxchange Br. Adjutant Chemical Br. Military Personnel Ordnance Br. Civilian Personnel Engineer Br. Chaplain Claim, Duties, & Imp. Quartermaster Br. Special Services Army Air Force Br. Post Exchange Medical Br. Signal Br. Trans. Supply Br. Dir. of Training Military Training Info. & Education Athletics & Education Dir. of Operations Water Div. Planning Br. Freight Br. Maintenance Br. Operations 3r. Ship Service Troop & Passenger Intransit Storage Intramuros Int. A. Intrensit Depot 1 Intransit Depot 2 Baggage Transportation Rail Motor r E E (V/ater Express?) V ,
and still others civilian employees; the components of totals are frequently
not indicated; and the total figures are therefore not to be trusted. The
- 120
largest total of personnel in any port command outside Manila was apparently
the 11,240 (75 officers, 142 enlisted men, and 26 civilians in the port
command, 308 officers, 7,989 enlisted men, and 2,700 civilians in attached
units) reported for Base M (San Fernando) in September 1945. Other reported
totals from Base M and other ports were not in excess of 10,000, and few
exceeded 6,000, The identity of port commanders and their dates of- ser
- 121
Notes on Chapter II
1. (1) HTC Australia, I, 2-3, 68, 72. (2) Memo, unsgd, addressee
unnamed, undtd, evidently from Chief Gtf, USAFIA for CG USAFIA, ca SO Jun
42, sub: Narrative Account of Major Activities of 0 , 1 1 Section, p. 15. App
15 to Barnes Rpt.
2. (l) USAFIA GO 20, 3 Mar 42, sub: Establishment of 3ase Sections.
Incl 1 to History of Base Section 6, Perth, Vfestern Australia. In SSUSA
HD file, 780-4. * (2) History of Base Section 6, cited in (l). (s) KTC Aus tralia, I, 82.
3. (1) HTC Australia, I, 89. (2) USAFIA GO 38, 15 Apr 42, sub: The
Mission, Organization, and Methods of Base Sections. In OCT KB, Gross file,
Australia.
4. USAFIA GO 40, 15 Apr 42, sub: Transportation Service, USAFIA. 3(a) to HTC Australia, Vol I.
Ref
5. USAFIA GO 76, 16 Jul 42, sub: The Mission, Organization, and Meth ods of Operation of Base Sections. Appended to History of Base Section 6,
Perth, V/estern Australia, cited in n. 2(l) above.
6. USASOS GO 10, 29 Aug 4-2. Ref 3(e) to HTC Australia, Vol I.
- 122
12.
13. USASOS Regulations No. 60-5, 21 Nov 43, sub: Transportation Corps
Organizations and Functions (mimeograph). In OCT SB file, SWPA - Organiza tion.
14. (1) Staff Memo 76, Hq Base Sec 3, USASOS, cited in n. 10 above.
(2) Memo, Office of the Port Base Commander, Hq Base Sec 3, USASOS, to sec tion chiefs, TC, Base Sec 3, 8 Nov 43. Ref 8 to HTC Australia, Vol II.
(3) Table of Organization, Office of the Transportation Officer, Hq Base
Sec 3, drawn by Maj W. F. Petteys, 6 Nov 43. In HTC Australia, Vol II,
following p. 95. At Townsville the Base Port Command established 1 Nov 43
consisted of the following sections: Water Transportation, Land Transpor tation, Movement, Supply, Ships1 Personnel Mail, Transit Warehouse, and
Fiscal. At Sydney the procurement, storage, and issue of TC supplies be came the responsibility of the Transportation Section, Base Service Command,
in Oct 1943. HTC Australia, II, 84-85, 125.
15. (l) Ibid.. Ill, 36, 39, 54. (2) The Base at Melbourne from Incep tion in January 1942 until Termination in May 1944. In SSUSA HD file, 780-5.
16. (l) Organization Manual, USASOS, Part II, revised 15 Aug 44. In
OCT HB file, SWPA - Organization. See Sec 202.05, Revision No. 1, 15 Aug
44. (2) Interview with Brig Gen Jonathan L. Holman, formerly CofS USASOS,
30 Jun 49.
17. Military History of Base Section USASOS from June to December 1944.
In SSUSA HD file, 780-14.
18. HTC Australia, I, 83, 87; II, 83.
19. (1) USASOS GO 65, 4 May 44. Ref 7 to HTC Australia, Vol III. (2)
Military History of Base Section USASOS, pp. 2-5.
20. Organization Manual, USASOS, Sec 201.00 (Revision 5, 15 Aug 44).
GO 65, cited above, directs that Base Section be organized according to
Organization Manual, USASOS, but no copy of an earlier revision of Sec 201.00
is found.
21. (1) Military History of Base Section USASOS, pp. 56, 11. (2)
USASOS GO 172, 29 Aug 44, sub: Disbandment of Base 1. Ref 10 to HTC Aus tralia, Vol III. (3) HTC Australia, III, 31. (4) USASOS GO 41, 6 Feb 45.
Ref 2 to HTC Hq, Feb 1945. (5) AFWESPAC GO 68, 18 Jul 45. Ref 11 to HTC
Hq, Jul 1945.
22. (l) AFWESPAC, Semi-Annual Rerport. 1 Jun - 31 Dec 45, p. 81. (2)
Ibid./l Jan - 30 Jun 46, p. 62.
23 (1) AFWESPAC GO 227, 17 Oct 46, sub: U s continuance of Australian
Base Command. Ref 2 to HTC Hq, Oct 1946. (2) HTC Hq, Nov 1946, p. 37.
- 123
24. (1) HTC Australia, III, 109-10; IV, 1-2. (2) HTC Hq, Jul 1946,
p. 40. (3) AFWESPAC GO 227, 17 Oct 46, cited above.
25. (1) HTC Australia, I, 84-87. in n. 2 above.
(2) History of Base Section 6, cited
26. (1) HTC Australia, I, 82-84. (2) Base Section No. 5 at Adelaide,
South Australia, from Inception, 3 March 1942, to Termination on 8 January
1943. In SSUSA HD file, 780-13.
27. HTC Australia, II, 83.
28. (1) Ibid.. I, 66-68; II, 76-77. (2) Memo, Chief, Overseas Supply
Div SIPE (Col Abbott Boone), for CG SSFE, 11 Feb 43, sub: Report of Visit
to Pacific Bases. (Hereafter cited as Boone Rpt.) In OCT HB file, POA.
Col Boone remarks that as of Oct 1942 the port was very little used, but
might "become very important at a later date should strategic operations
change present direction." (2) Information from Mariners, Rpt No. 133,
compiled by Collection Unit, Military Intelligence Div, 21 Dec 43, giving
information from the Chief Mate of the SS Hall Young, at Darv/in 14-25 Jun
43. In OCT HB file, SWPA - Ports & Facilities. Referring to the wharf at
Darwin the observer remarks that "eight men and a small gasoline pile driver
were rushing the repairs to completion." (3) Base Section 1, at Darwin,
during Years 1942 and 1943, dtd 23 Oct 44. In SSUSA HD file, 780-9. (4)
Military History of Base Section USASOS from June to December 1944. In
SSUSA HD file, 780-14.
29. (l) The Base at Melbourne from Inception in January 1942 until
Termination in May 1944. In SSUSA HD file, 780-5. (2) HTC Australia, I,
78-81. (3) 2oone Rpt. (4) Rpt, Asst to CG SITE (Lewis Lapham), addressee
unnamed, 6 Mar 43. (Hereafter cited as Lapham Rpt.) Atchd to memo, Lt Col
Baymond C. Stone, Hq ASF, for Chief, Control Div, Hq ASF, 13 May 43. In
OCT EB file, POA - Inspection Trips. According to this report, Melbourne
was destined to "serve solely as a rest and rehabilitation centre for troops,
being well out of the malaria belt and provided with fine hospital facili ties, and as a procurement centre for material. American ships arriving
now, excepting hospital ships, are few and far between." (5) Information
from Mariners, Rpt No. 87, compiled by Intelligence Grp, Collection Unit,
Military Intelligence Service, 28 Aug 43. In OCT HB file, S W A - Ports &
Facilities.
30. USASOS Military History, pp. 60-G1.
31. (l) Ibid.. pp. 61-64. (2) Milne Bay, New Guinea, as a Base from
July 1942 to June 1944. In SSUSA HD file, 780-13. No copy of GO No. 7, Hq
USASOS, 11 Aug 42, has been found.
32. (l) Ltr, Hq USASOS to CO, U. S. Advanced 3ase, New Guinea, 12 Aag
42, subJ Directive. (2) Supplemental directive, same to same, 27 Aug 42.
Both in Origin and Purposes of Combined Operational Service Command and the
- 124
Supply Plan for Hew Guinea at That Time. In SSUSA HD file, 780-2.
33. (1) Origin and Purpose p s e s of Combined Operational Service Command,
g 11 11 Z2 U 11 Z2% U ) ) U US SA AS S S S
Mili
Militar ^ ^ * yH History, pp. 64-S5. (3) HTC Australia,
^n ^
ll"(6.
?T
11I
36. (1) GO 42, 14 Aug 43. lief 1 to HTC Hq, Jul 1943 - Feb 1944. (2)
USASOS Military History, pp. 68-70.
37. Somervell questionnaire, question 8.
38. (1) USASOS GO 73, 14 Nov 43, sub: Reorganization of USASOS Installa tions. Ref 3 to HTC Ho, Jul 1943 - Feb 1944. (2) USASOS Military History,
pp. 51-52. (3) "JSASOS GO 5, 8 Jan 44. Kef 2 to HTC Australia, Vol III.
(4) History of Major Activities of the Quartermaster Section, IV, 6.
39. (l) USASOS 00 91, 19 Dec 43, sub: Establishment of Advance Head quarters. Exhibit 2 to 6-4 Periodic Report, USASOS, Quarter Ending 31 Decem ber 1943. In AG- 319.1(31 Dec 43)(2). (2) USASOS Military History, pp.
52-54. (3) Organization Manual, USASOS, Sec 100.01 (Revision No. 3, 25
Mar 44), 200.02 (Revision Ho. 4, 15 .aug 44). In OCT H3 file, SWPA - Organ ization.
40. (1) HTC Hq, Jul 1943 - Feb 1944, p. 3. (2) Memo, Transportation
Officer, Hq Intermediate Sec USASOS (Lt Col George T. Wright), for CTO
USASOS, _ Jan 45, sub: Military History, Transportation Corps, Headquarters,
Intermediate Section. IncJ 15f to Rpt, Maj Mark C. Collarino, Overseas
Operation Br Planning Div OCT to ACofT for Operations, 1 May 45, sub: Notes
on Trip from Washington to POA and SW?A, 19 March to 22 April In OCT HB
file, POA. Certain details have been clarified by Col Floyd S. Fix (inter view of 7 Jul 49).
41. (1) HTC New Guinea, 1942-44, pp. 51-52. (2) USASOS GO 44, 24 Mar
44, sub: Establishment of USASOS Base G Command. Ref 6 to HTC Australia,
Vol III. (3) USASOS GO 82, 5 Jun 44. Ref lc to HTC ITew Guinea, 1942-44.
(4) USASOS GO 103, 25 Jun 44, sub: Control of Base G. Ref 8 to HTC Austra lia, Vol III. (5) Base G at Hollandia from Founding, March 1944, to May
1945. In SSUSA HD file, 780-21. (6) USASOS GO 153, 13 Aug 44, sub: Estab lishment of Base H. Ref Id to HTC Hew Guinea, 1942-44. (7) USASOS GO 41,
6 Feb 45. Ref 2 to HTC Hq, Feb 1945.
- 125
42. (l) AFWESPAC GO 41, 27 Jan 45, sub: Discontinuance of Headquar ters, New Guinea Base Section. (2) AFWESPAC GO 76, 23 Jul 45. (3) 4FWESPAC
GO 80, 26 Jul 45. (4) AFWESPAC GO 95, 7 Aug 45. (5) AFWESPAC GO 119, 17
Aug 45, sub: Rescission of General Orders. All appended as Refs l(a)-l(e)
to HTC New Guinea, 1945. (6) AFWESPAC GO 50, 1 Jul 45, sub: Establishment
of Sub-Office of the Chief Transportation Officer, AFWESPAC. Ref 3 to HTC
Hq, Jul 1945. (7) AFWESPAC GO 6, 4 Feb 46. Ref 12 to HTC Hq, Jan 1946.
(8) AFWESPAC GO 123, 10 Apr 46, sub: Discontinuance of Base H. Ref 5 to
HTC New Guinea, 1945. (9) AFWESPAC GO 135, 6 May 46. Ref 2 to HTC Hq, Apr
1946. (10) HTC Hq, Aug 1945, p. 2; Jun 1946, p. 3.
43. (1) USASOS GO 132, 23 Jul 44, sub: Establishment of Army Service
Command. Ref 7 to HTC Australia, Vol III. (2) History of ASCOM from July
23 to December 26, 1944, pp. 1-4. In SSUSA HD file, 780-15.
44. (1) History of ASCOM from July 23, pp. 6-16. (2) Extract from
History of the Army Service Command, 26 December 1944 to 13 February 1945
(M-l Operation). In OCT HB file, SWPA - Organization. (3) Base K on Leyte
from the Inception, September 14, 1944, to December 25, 1944. Atend to (l)
above. (4) Base M on Luzon from Inception in November 1944 until March
1945. In SSUSA HD file, 780-20. (5) Chart prepared by Capt Robert R. Smith,
HD SSUSA, undtd, sub: United States Army Services of Supply, Southwest Pac ific Area. In OCT HB file, SWPA - Organization. (6) HTC Philippine Islands,
Apr 1945, p. 14.
45. (1) USASOS GO 42, 11 Feb 45. Ref 3 to HTC Hq, Feb 1945. (2) Luzon
Base Section, USASOS, from 13 February to 1 April 1945. In SSUSA HD file,
780-20. (3) Organization Manual, Luzon Base Section, USASOS, 1 Mar 45, with
certain revised pages of later date in Mar 1945. Incl 8 to Collarino Hpt.
(4) USASOS GO 45, 12 Feb 45. Ref 4 to HTC Hq, Feb 1945.
46. (1) USASOS GO 92, 26 Mar 45. Ref 2 to HTC Hq, Mar 1945. (2) USASOS
GO 101, 4 Apr 45. Ref 1 to HTC Hq, Apr 1945. (3) USASOS GO 107, 8 Apr 45.
Ref 2 to HTC Hq, Apr 1945. (4) USASOS GO 111, 11 Apr 45, sub: Establishment
of Headquarters, Base Q , . Ref 3 to HTC Hq, Apr 1945. (5) HTC Hq, Apr 1945,
p. 2; May 1945, p. 3. (6) HTC Philippine Islands, Apr 1945, pp. 1, 15. (7)
Chart cited above as n. 44(5). (8) Ltr, Hq USASOS to CG PHIBSEC, 13 Jul 45,
sub: Operational Control of Luzon Military Railroad System. Ref 7 to HTC Hq,
Jul 1945. (9) AFWESPAC GO 74, 22 Jul 45. Ref 6 to HTC Hq, Jul 1945. (lO)
A3WESPAC GO 178, 15 Sep 45, sub: Discontinuance of Philippine Base Section.
Ref 5 to HTC Hq, Oct 1945. (ll) AFV/ESPAC, Semi-Annual Report. 1 Jun - 31
Dec 45, p. 49. (12) History of Major Activities of the Quartermaster Section,
711, 9 (citing USASOS GO 161, 24 May 45, discontinuing Bases Q, and T effec tive 10 June 45).
47. (1) APWESPAC, Semi-Annual Report. 1 Jun - 31 Dec 45, pp. 5, 19.
(2) GO 8, Hq USASCOM-C, 3 Aag 45, sub: Announcement of Staff, App 1 to His tory of the Transportation Section, USASCOMC, Aug 1945. In OCT HB file,
Japan - Reports.
48. (1) AFWESPAC GO 239, 19 Oct 45. Ref 1 to HTC Philippine Islands,
- 126
Oct 1945. (2) AiWESPAC GO 277, 5 Nov 45. Ref 4 to HTC Hq, Nov 1945. (3)
ABVESPAG GO 41, 23 Jan 46. Ref 4 to HTC Hq, Jan 1946. (4) HTC Hq, Jun 1946,
pp. 2-3. (5) A5VESPAC, Semi-Annual Report. 1 Jan - 30 Jun 46, p. 23.
49. (1) AFWESPAG, Semi-Annual Report. 1 Jan - 30 Jun 46, pp. xi, 23,
25, 39-40. (2) HTC Hq, May 1946, pp. 2, 28; Jun 1946, p. 21.
50. (l) History of Transportation Activities on Okinawa from Inception
through 1945. In OCT HB file, Okinawa. (2) ASWESPAC, Semi-Annual Report.
1 Jun - 31 Dec 45, p. 69.
51. Rad, CinC AtfPAC to CG U. S. Army Forces Middle Pacific and CG 10th
Army, 26 Jul 45. In OCT 323.3 SWPA.
52. (1) AFWESPAC, Semi-Annual Report. 1 Jun - 31 Dec 45, p. 69. (2)
Ibid., 1 Jan - 30 Jun 46, p. 43. (3) AFWESPAC GO 213, 9 Oct 45, Sub: Oki nawa Base Command. Ref 6 to HTC Hq, Oct 1945. (4) GO 2, Hq FEC, 1 Jan 47,
sub: Establishment and Redesignation of Commands and Units, Assignment of
Personnel, and Announcement of Organization. Ref l(b) to KTC Hq, Jan 1947.
53. (1) USASOS Military History, pp. 60, 66-67. (2) HTC Australia, I,
70; II, 71, 84. (3) USASOS GO 153, 13 Aug 44, sub: Establishment of Base
H. Ref Id to HTC New Guinea, 1942-44.
54. USASOS Military History, pp. 62, 66.
55 (l) Ibid., pp. 66, 71-72. (2) Base at Lae until March 1944, pp.
126, 130. In SSUSA HD file, 780-18. (3) USASOS GO 73, 14 Nov 43, sub: Re organization of USASOS Installations. Ref 3 to HTC Hq, Jul 1943 - Feb 1944.
56. (1) USASOS Military History, pp. 66-67. (2) HTC Australia, II, 82.
(3) HTC New Guinea, 1942-44, pp. 3-4. (4) USASOS GO 50, 7 Sep 43. Ref 10
to HTC Australia, Vol II. (5) USASOS GO 73, 14 Nov 43, cited in n. 55(3).
57 (1) HTC New Guinea, 1942-44, pp. 23-24. (2) USASOS Military His tory, p. 62. (3) History of Port Detachment S, 1 Jun 44. In possession
of Lt Col Carroll K. Moffatt. (4) Milne Bay, New Guinea, as a Base from
July 1942 to June 1944. In SSUSA HD file, 780-12.
58. Base K on Leyte from the Inception, September 14, 1944, to Decem ber 25, 1944. In SSUSA HD file, 780-15.
59 The date is from the source cited as n. 6l(l) below.
- 127
- 128
- 129