Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
consensus reached in a Delphi may not be a true consensus; it may be a product of specious or manipulated consensus. A specious consensus does not contain the best judgment. Instead, it is a compromise position (Mitroff & Turoff, 1975). For Fred Woudenberg, he found that Delphi does not produce more accurate answers than other methods, and that consensus occurs as a result of pressure brought on participants that have extreme opinions (Woudenberg, 1991). And the accuracy and reliability of a judgment method are difficult to evaluate. A measurement can be partitioned into a true score and an error component. The error component can be regarded as consisting of a number of random variables. These random variables tend to cancel each other out in the long run, giving the error component an expectation of zero. Other reasons make against Delphi such as a low level reliability of judgments among experts and therefore dependency of forecast on the particular judges selected; the sensitivity of results to ambiguity in the questionnaire that is used for data collection in each round; and the difficulty in accessing the degree of expertise incorporated into the forecast (Makridakis and Wheelright, 1978). Olaf Helmer also agrees that, there are difficulties in defining qualifications and measuring relative performance of experts. That is, it is far from obvious what we mean or should mean when we say that somebody is an expert (who is expert, what biases each expert has,
etc.). Because it is difficult to evaluate the accuracy of a judgment method, it is not surprising
that the accuracy of the Delphi has been falsely inferred from other criteria, such as consensus, the log-normality of first estimates, and the relation between remoteness and precision of a forecast. The researcher might not be able to conceptualize different ways to examine the problem being investigated. As researchers become more creative in perceiving how different individuals may view the same problem in many different ways, this becomes less of a weakness. Also, if a researcher hastily tries to complete a Delphi, thorough time for thought may not be given to the problem and consensus may not be obtained. Therefore, researchers must be careful to follow the steps in any Delphi to make sure that the experts in the group have a chance to provide appropriate feedback. Time is also necessary so that the researcher appropriately restructures the questionnaire from round to round so that adequate and correct feedback is provided through the questionnaire. All of these weaknesses and limitations result in a poorly designed and executed Delphi technique, which will result in inadequate or incorrect data.