IBM® Edge2013 - Storage Efficiencies Through Virtualization Compression and Flash

Richard Swain IT Storage Specialist Friday, May 31, 2013
Creating Better Storage Efficiencies through Virtualization, Compression and Flash Technology
2013 IBM Corporation
Richard (Rich) Swain IT Storage Specialist
17 years in IT 10 in Storage Certified Storage Specialist Netapp Certified Technologist Microsoft Certified Professional Blog: The Storage Tank Twitter: IBMRich rswain@us.ibm.com
Moores Law, Gordon Moore Co-Founder of Intel The number of transistors on integrated circuits doubles approximately every two years
Kryders Law: Mark Kryder, CTO Seagtate The density of hard drives increases by a factor of 1,000 every 10.5 years (doubling every 13 months).
next goal: a terabit per square inch
Moore vs Kyder Results
Capacity VS Throughput
What does this all mean?
Demand for storage is continuing to rise Drives are becoming larger and out pacing the processing power Throughput is not scaling compared to drive size As drives become larger, fewer drives can be used driving down total IOPS
Virtualization
Whats a Storage hypervisor?

Server hypervisor has a well understood value connotation
Pooled physical resources are consumed by virtual machines resulting in high asset utilization Virtual machines are mobile giving CIOs their choice of physical server device A common set of value capabilities and centralized management are provided for virtual machines regardless of what physical server they are sitting on
On Intel systems server virtualization platform (VMware vSphere or Red Hat EV) and server virtualization management (VMWare vCenter or Red Hat EV Manager) On Power systems server virtualization platform (IBM PowerVM) and server virtualization management (IBM Director VMControl)
Storage hypervisor is a rapidly emerging way of describing the same value points in a storage context
Pooled Physical Resources

Dramatically improve utilization of your physical storage assets
How? Pooled physical resources from virtually any disk array vendor or tier
Common Capabilities
Deliver tier-1 service regardless of hardware choice
SLA (Service Level Agreement) is encapsulated with the data in a virtual volume.
How? Common capabilities delivered by the storage hypervisor I/O caching, thin provisioning, automated tiering, application-integrated snapshot and mirroring, mobility-driven disruption avoidance
The desired service is delivered by the Storage hypervisor independent of the underlying hardware platform.
Mobility
Balance workload, manage lease termination, improve datacenter performance How? Mobility of virtual volumes between any physical disk arrays Move on the fly, snapshot or mirror between arrays In a single physical datacenter or across two physical datacenters up to 300km apart
Centralized Management
Optimize your people for the challenges of day-to-day operations How? Centralized management Visualization, health, capacity, performance Storage services catalog, automated provisioning, payper-use
Compression
15
IBM Real-time Compression

100%
Compression Capability
Primary Storage Efficiency

Compelling Compression rates Reduces your overall cost per TB Immediate results!
50%
50%
75%
85% 85% 85%
0%
Databases Database Logs E-Mail Virtual Servers Text
Integrated IBM Real-time Compression

Expected Compression Ratios
Uses same proven RandomAccess Compression Engine (RACE) as IBM RTC Appliances Delivers very similar levels of compression IBM Compresstimator tool can be used to evaluate expected compression benefits
DB2 and Oracle databases Linux virtual OSes Windows virtual OSes 2003 Office 2007 or later CAD/CAM Up to 80% Up to 70% Up to 50% Up to 60% Up to 20% Up to 70%
Virtual Servers (VMware)
Integrated IBM Real-time Compression

Compression without Compromise
Compress active primary data Operates immediately and does not require additional reserve space Increase value of new and old storage
3500 3000 2500 IOPS 2459 2926
2000
1500 1000 500 0 Oracle TPC-C DB2 TPC-C No Compression Exchange Jetstress 986 987 982 988
Compressed
Compression Without Compromise VMware

VMware Vmark Performance Benchmarks
MailServer Score
50
MailServer Qos
40
Storwize V7000 with Real-time Compression delivers up to 4x compression while maintaining VMware and Application performance
400 300 200 100 0

Uncompressed
30 20 10
Uncompressed
Compressed
Compressed
Measured Score (Performance)
Measured Qos (Response Time)
OLIO Score
4000 3000
Uncompressed
OLIO Qos
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Uncompressed Compressed
2000 1000
Compressed
Measured Score (Performance)
Measured Qos (Response Time)
19
Database Performance
1.2 1.144 No Compression - 96 disks Compressed 48 disks
Response Time in Seconds
Storwize V7000 with Real-time Compression delivers up to 5x compression while maintaining or improving database transaction response time and overall business throughput
.857
Compressed 6 Flash Drives
.8
.701 .665 .501 .468 .385
.4
.46
.20
Stock Level
Delivery
Order Status
The benchmark was performed using a Storwize V7000 system with 48 x 300GB SAS disks. 1.2TB database with 700 concurrent clients were used in the benchmark. The same test was performed with compressed volumes and non-compressed volumes.
Real-time Compression - Performance Differentiation

1 MB chunk
100 byte update
Traditional Approaches
Must decompress entire file to edit Much more I/O
Real-time Compression
No need to decompress data to modify data No application performance impact The only storage compression solution that works in real time on active data
Much more CPUwork

Network impact No way to make real-time
SystemFlash
22
Target the bottleneck in the IT stack

In the past 10 years:
CPU speed performance increased

DRAM speed performance increased
~8-10x
~7-9x ~100x ~20x ONLY 1.2x
Network speed performance increased Bus speed performance increased Disk speed performance increased
Storage disk speed is the bottleneck thats slowing everything else in the IT stack
Flash delivers performance and value to boost the critical applications running your business
Extreme performance: MicoLatency: Macro efficiency: Low TCO: Enterprise reliability: Serve customers faster Gain competitive advantage Do more things at once Save money and boost value Go the distance
Eliminate the storage-tier bottleneck and drive efficiency across the entire data path!
Flash use cases
Consolidation
End-user experience maximization
Price/performance economics attainment
Developer time optimization
Application scalability
Footprint minimization
Flash benefits
Boost performance/efficiency without re-architecting applications or the storage infrastructure
85% reduction in batch processing times
90% reduction In OLTP times
25-100 s latency for deterministic performance
80% reduction In energy usage
75% reduction in footprint Store one petabyte in one floor tile, add compression and add up to 100% more
Enterprise reliability High availability, 2D RAIDTM and Variable Stripe RAIDTM (VSR)
Compare flash performance / efficiency

Compare the capabilities of a rack of flash to a traditional 15K drive implementation Performance
Flash can service up to 5.9M IOPS Disk requires over 98 racks of 15K RPM drives Nearly a 200:1 performance/capacity advantage
Density Flash provides 500TB of usable capacity Disk requires almost 4.5 racks of 600GB drives Nearly a 9:1 capacity/rack space advantage
Environmental Flash uses <10 KVA Disk drives would consume ~6,000 KVA Nearly a 600:1 energy/IOPS advantage
Flash works now

Supplement your existing infrastructure Assign flash the heaviest, most critical workload Decrease overall response times Increase efficiency/utilization across the IT stack Completely eliminate storage performance issues
Remove the IO bottleneck!

So whos using flash now? How has it helped their business?
Flash simply improves performancenow
Flash is a block data storage device that delivers deterministic high performance (s) and enables customers to: Increase CPU (application) efficiency Decrease time to operation results Unlock scale of users or processes Provide the best end-user experience
simply by reducing latency

Storage disk latency drives CPU utilization/efficiency lower

1. Issue I/O request 2. Wait for I/O to be serviced 3. Process I/O (~ 100 s) (~ 5,000 s) (~ 100 s)
Time to process 1 I/O request = 100 s + 5,000 s + 100 s = 5,200 s CPU utilization = Wait time / Processing time = 200 / 5,200 = ~4%
~100s Processing
~100s
CPU state
~5000 s
Waiting
Time
1 I/O request
Flashs microlatency drives CPU utilization/efficiency higher

1. Issue I/O request 2. Wait for I/O to be serviced 3. Process I/O (~ 100 s) (~ 200 s) (~ 100 s)
Time to process 1 I/O request = 100 s + 200 s + 100 s = 400 s CPU utilization = Wait time / Processing time = 200 / 400 = ~50%
Speed application response up to 12x simply by changing storage latency!
~100s Processing
~100s
CPU state
~200 s Waiting Time
1 I/O request
The real cost of latency

In the financial sector, which relies on ultralow-latency networks to drive low-risk, high-volume trading profits, a 1 millisecond (ms) advantage could be worth upwards of $100 million a year
The world's biggest e-tailer estimates that every millisecond delay to its online service costs it $4.8 million in lost sales
Source: Richard Irving Capacity Magazine
SVC, RTC & System Flash
33
IBM Smarter Storage is an approach for the design and deployment of storage
34
SAN Volume Controller is a key element of IBM Smarter Storage
Virtualize IBM and non-IBM disk systems to increase utilization by up to 30%

IBM XIVTM
SVC is designed to pool storage volumes into a reservoir of capacity for centralized management. SVC helps to hide the boundaries among disk systems, which simplify management and enables customers to focus on managing storage as a resource to meet business requirements and not as a set of boxes.
Make changes to the storage without disrupting host applications

Virtual Disk Virtual Disk Virtual Disk Virtual Disk
Flexibility to auto or manually migrate full volumes to meet needs
SAN
Apply common copy services across the storage pool
DS8000
SAN Volume Controller

Advanced Copy Services Storage Pool
HP HDS
DS4000
Manage the storage pool from a central point
EM C
Combine the capacity from multiple arrays into a single pool of storage
35
SVC 6.4 Supported Environments

IBM z/VSE z/VM z/Linux
IBM Power Microsoft IBM AIX Solaris Novell Windows VMware IBM i 6.1 NetWare vSphere 4, 5 Hyper-V (VIOS) OES2 HP-UX 11i Tru64 OpenVMS Linux (Intel/Power/z) RHEL 4/5/6 IBM TS7650G SUSE 9/10/11 Apple ProtecTIER SGI IRIX Mac OS Gateway Citrix Xen Server IBM BladeCenter Flex System PureFlex
1024 Hosts
iSCSI or FCOE Point-in-time Copy 1Gb or 10Gb Full volume, Copy on write 256 targets, Incremental, Cascaded, Reverse, Snapshots, FlashCopy Mgr
Thin Provisioning Easy Tier
8Gbps SAN fabric
Continuous Copy Multiple Cluster Mirror Metro/Global Mirror Stretched Cluster

Internal SSD
SAN
Real-time Compression
Virtual Disk Mirroring Compellent IBM

Fluid Data
MA, EMA Lightning CLARiiON StorageTek FAS iStorage N series DS MSA, EVA, CX4, Thunder StorEdge Storwize V7000 TagmaStore DS3000, DS4000 XP, P9500, Symmetrix, XioTech Bull DS5000, DS6000 DCS9XXX 3Par AMS, WMS, DMX, VMAX, Violin DS8000 Emprise USP, USP-V Storeway VNX, VNXe VSP * Confirm all supported configurations at ibm.com/storage/support/2145 and click on Support
IBM XIV
IBM
Hitachi
HP
EMC
Sun
NetApp NEC
Fujitsu
Eternus
TMS
RamSAN
NexSAN
SATABeast
Pillar
Axiom
36
10 Years of SVC history; A Continuous Evolution

2011 Storwize V7000 Unified Mixed Replication Longer distance split cluster Native LDAP New Global Mirror option
2003 2145-4F2 4 node
2004 2145-8F2 VSS GDS
2006 Global Mirror Multi-target FlashCopy
2008 Thin provisioning vDisk Mirroring SVC Entry Edition
2010 Storwize V7000 New GUI Easy Tier
1.1
1.2
2.1
3.1
4.1
4.2
4.3
5.1
6.1
6.2 6.2
6.3
6.4
2004 8 nodes
2005 2145-8F4
2007 2145-8G4 FlashCopy enhancements
2009 2145-CF8 SSD support 3 site Mirror > 2TB VDisk Split cluster iSCSI Zero detect
2011 2145-CG8 VAAI >2 TB MDisk Performance monitor Flash Copy enhancements
2012 Real-time Compression Non-disruptive volume move FCoE 4 way Storwize V7000 clustering
37
IBM System Storage SAN Volume Controller

SVC 2145-CG8 engine based on IBM System x3550 M3 server (1U) Intel Xeon 5600 (Westmere) 2.53 GHz quad-core processor 24GB of cache 8Gb Four 8Gbps FC ports
ps FC
10Gbp s iSCSI
1Gbps iSCSI
10Gbps iSCSI
Supports up to four internal 146GB SSDs Optional 10 Gb Ethernet support for 10 Gb iSCSI host attachment and future FCoE support Two 10Gb ports per storage engine Storage engine supports 10Gb iSCSI or internal SSDs but not both Factory install or nondisruptive field upgrade Engines may be intermixed in pairs with other engines in SVC clusters Mixing engine types in a cluster results in volume throughput characteristics of the engine type in that I/O group
38 38
Cluster non-disruptive upgrade capability may be used to replace older engines with CG8 engines
Replaces the SVC 2145-CF8 engine
38 2013 IBM Corporation
IBM Easy Tier delivers optimized high performance

Dynamically re-distributes active data across a hybrid storage pool of SolidState Devices (SSDs) & hard disks based on workload characteristics Monitors access to extents and analyses history to promote hot extents and demote inactive ones Supports both internal SSDs and SSDs in virtualized disk systems Helps improve storage system performance Helps reduce cost by automatically placing only most active data on SSD, reducing need for SSD capacity Easy Tier can improve throughput up to 200% and reduce response time up to 30% with only about 10% of total capacity on SSD*
* IBM measurements
Host
Host
Host
Host Volumes & Extents
Hybrid storage pool
SSD
HDD
Automatic extent migration
Improving Application Test with SEFC

Production systems often have many test systems that are replicas of production
SE
Production
SAP is known for often having large number of copies

Using thin provisioned FlashCopy to create replicas could significantly reduce storage In this example, use fully-allocated test master to isolate test systems from production disk Production and test could be on separate disk systems
SE
FA
Test master copy
FA
SE SE
Test
Test master can be used to reset test virtual disks after test runs
Implementation uses snapshots, cascaded, and multi-target FC This example uses around 2x production data Compare with 5x for regular FlashCopy
40
Virtual Disk Mirroring
SVC stores two copies of a virtual disk, usually on separate disk systems SVC maintains both copies in sync and writes to both copies If disk supporting one copy fails, SVC provides continuous data access by using other copy Copies are automatically resynchronized after repair Intended to protect critical data against failure of a disk system or disk array A local high availability function, not a disaster recovery function Copies can be split Either copy can continue as production copy Either or both copies may be space-efficient
41
Greater Flexibility for Remote Mirror
Global Mirror or Metro Mirror
SVC remote mirror now supports replication to/from Storwize V7000 systems Enables lower cost DR configurations by mirroring directly to Storwize V7000 disk system without need for second SVC system Provides options to redeploy existing storage to extend life and enhance value
42
Improved Data Protection with SVC Enhanced Stretched Cluster

2-site Stretched Cluster
Server Cluster 1 SVC Stretched-cluster Failover Server Cluster 2
Stretched virtual volume
Up to 300km
Data center 1 Data center 2
Improve availability, load-balance, and deliver real-time remote data access by distributing applications and their data across multiple sites. Seamless server / storage failover when used in conjunction with server or hypervisor clustering (such as VMware or PowerVM) Up to 300km between sites (3x EMC VPLEX)
4-site Disaster Recovery
Server Cluster 1
Failover
Server Cluster 2
Server Cluster 1
Failover
Server Cluster 2
For combined high availability and disaster recovery needs, synchronously or asynchronously mirror data over long distances between two high-availability stretch clusters.
Metro or Global Mirror
Data center 1
Data center 2
Data center 1
Data center 2
High Availability Disaster Recovery
High Availability
43
IBM SAN Volume Controller Enhancements

Continuing SVC leadership in storage virtualization
Integrated IBM Real-time Compression Improves efficiency with up to 80% reduction in physical disk space required enabling up to 5x data in the same space Lower rack space, power, and cooling Applicable to much wider range of data than alternative options Significantly enhanced value for existing storage Nondisruptive volume move Rebalance workload across complete systems without disruption Support for Fiber Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) Supports next-generation converged data center networking
44
Nondisruptive Volume Move

SVC supports moving a volume without disruption from one storage pool to another Includes moving between internal and external virtualized storage A volume is presented to servers by a single I/O group Now, a volume can be moved from one I/O group to another without disruption to applications Supports load balancing across an entire system Helpful when adding I/O groups to an SVC system Initially supported with RedHat 6.1 and SLES 11 Working on AIX, VMware, Windows 2008
Move virtual volume

Control Enclosure Control Enclosure
Move volume between storage pools
45
SVC FCoE Support

SVC offers extensive support for FCoE enabling full use of converged networks Also supports migration from Fibre Channel networks SVC supports FCoE with 10Gb Ethernet ports on Model CG8 engines Existing SVC engines may be upgraded with 10Gb Ethernet without disruption These ports may be used simultaneously for both FCoE and iSCSI server attachment SVC supports FCoE for all the same functions that FC is supported FC Host connected to SVC (either FC or FCoE ports) FCoE Host connected to SVC (either FC or FCoE ports) SVC (FC or FCoE ports) connected to storage system FC ports SVC (FC or FCoE ports) connected to storage system FCoE ports In an SVC system, communication among I/O groups using any combination of FC and FCoE ports For remote mirroring, between systems using any combination of FC and FCoE
46
Compression Without Compromise Enhancing SVC to Deliver Extraordinary Efficiency
Introducing IBM SAN Volume Controller Real-time Compression Innovative, easy-to-use compression fully integrated into SVC High performance implementation supports active primary workloads Real-time Compression builds on storage efficiency advantages of SVC SVC Real-time Compression delivers up to 50% or better compression for data that is not already compressed Compression helps reduce Storage purchase costs Rack space Power and cooling Software costs for additional functions
Compression can help freeze storage growth or delay need for additional purchases
47
Compression Without Compromise Variable Sized Compression Enhances Performance and Efficiency
RACE flips this approach, taking a variable data stream and producing a fixed output Compressed volume has a consistent logical layout Temporal locality: data thats accessed together is compressed together Variable sized input chunks get better compression Less data is compressed and decompressed Fewer disk I/Os Better performance
Real-time Compression Variable input Fixed output
Map
1 MB chunk
100 byte update
Traditional Compression
IBM Real-time Compression
1 MB Read
1 MB Decompress 100 Byte Update 1 MB Compress 1 MB Write
0 MB Read
0 MB Decompress 0 Byte Update 100 Byte Compress <100 Byte Write
Compressed volume Original I/O

Total I/O: 2 MB
Total I/O: <100 Bytes
Compression Without Compromise Easy to Understand: Effectiveness
Compression effectiveness displayed for system overall, pools, and volumes
49
IBM Flash Portfolio

IBM Delivers Flash-Based Products in all Segments
Shipped over 72 Petabytes of Flash storage in 2012 Broad array of products to fit a wide variety of client needs
IBM FlashSystem
Varying capacity and performance to match client workloads

Several form factors to fit into varying needs of datacenter real estate
EXP30 Ultra SSD Drawer
eXFlash
IBM High IOPS Adapters
DS8000 XIV
Storwize V7000 DS5000
IBM Flash Portfolio Hybrid Storage Systems

Catering to clients requiring large capacity, performance and enterprise features Optimizes the broad scope of storage workloads that exist in todays complex data centers. Enables systems to scale to more than 2.3 Petabytes (PB) and support multiple drive tiers. Dynamically optimizes performance for single- and multi-tiered systems with IBM System Storage Easy Tier and other self-tuning features.
IBM Flash Portfolio Direct Attach Flash Storage

In-Server Flash Storage for workloads with a performance focus SSD I/O Drawers and RAIDed Flash solutions such as eXFlash for applications requiring to balance performance, serviceability and availability PCIe Flash and SSD adapters positioned for low latency in-server applications SSDs enabling high-speed system booting, data caching and superior serviceability
IBM FlashSystem 720 / FlashSystem 820

High performance, low latency, high reliability solution to turbocharge your business
Designed for running multitenant heterogeneous (mixed workload) applications that require built-in high availability features Transactional (OLTP) databases Analytical (OLAP) databases Virtualization & virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) High performance computing (HPC) Cloud infrastructure, private and public
Extreme Performance
SLC (720)/eMLC (820) 5,10, 20 TB w/ High Availability (6,12, 24 TB non HA) 525K (720/820) IOPS 5 (720) / 4 (820) GB/s Bandwidth
MicroLatency
Low Latency 100/25 s (720) 110/25 s (820) Read/Write Purpose-built, highly parallel design Maximize host CPU efficiency and productivity
Macro Efficiency
1U form factor- minimal footprint for best of breed ROI Two dual-port 8 Gb Fibre Channel controllers or dual-port 40Gb QDR InfiniBand controllers Hot swappable flash modules Low power 500 watts (720) / 450 watts(820)
Enterprise Reliability
Variable Stripe RAID to protect against chip failure Redundancy for power, data, and management 2D Flash RAID eliminates single point of failures Available integrated spare flash card limiting down time Error Correcting Code (ECC) at chip level
IBM FlashSystem 720 / FlashSystem 820 Architecture

Redundant Management Control Processors Two Dual-Ported 8 Gb/s FC or 40 Gb/s QDR IB Interfaces Redundant Power Supplies N+1 batteries
Redundant RAID controllers
1U Chassis 12 Flash Modules (10+1+1) Redundant Fans

IBM FlashSystem 710 / FlashSystem 810

Speed up critical applications and make decisions faster
Accelerate read-heavy enterprise storage area network (SAN) applications Data warehouses and online analytical processing (OLAP) databases Sequential data collection Large centralized databases Content delivery networks Rendering and video editing Modeling and simulation
Extreme Performance
SLC (710) / eMLC (810) 1-5 TB or 2-10 TB 570K (710) / 550K (810) IOPS 5 GB/s (710)/ 4 GB/s (810) Bandwidth
MicroLatency
Low latency 100/60 s (710) and 110 / 60 s (810) Read/Write Purpose-built, highly parallel design Maximize host CPU efficiency and productivity
Macro Efficiency
1U form factor- minimal footprint for best of breed ROI Two dual-port 8 Gb Fibre Channel controllers or dual-port 40Gb QDR InfiniBand controllers Low power 450 watts (710) / 400 watts(810) Available hot-swapable flash modules in 720/820
Enterprise Reliability
Variable Stripe RAID to protect against chip failure Redundant power supplies with active failover protection against single-source power issues Error Correcting Code (ECC) at chip level Available integrated spare flash card
IBM FlashSystem 710 / FlashSystem 810 Architecture

Management Control Processors Two Dual-Ported 8 Gb/s FC or 40 Gb/s QDR IB Interfaces Redundant Power Supplies N+1 batteries
4-21 Flash Modules (including optional spare)
1U Chassis
Redundant Fans
Use Cases
57
Storage Virtualization at its Finest
Sprint had a lot of heterogeneity in their storage environment with low utilization
Started at 35% Achieved 82% utilization Started at 70% T1 / 30%T2 Achieved 30% T1 / 70% T2 Storage maintenance costs have been reduced 60% YoY
UFC knocks out production bottlenecks with IBM flash

Business challenges
Extreme media streaming requirement
Flash has just completely eliminated [bottlenecks]. Everythings flowing smoothly. Mike Saindon, Production Engineer Before we put the flash in, we couldnt use our asset management system to its maximum capacity and intent. Christy King, Vice President of Digital, Technology and R&D
Solution
Implement a high-impact, nondisruptive RamSan solution which was installed in a single day
With flash, streaming batch jobs completed up to 70 percent faster and improved performance and efficiency on other disk storage platforms by 40 percent!
2013 IBM Corporation 59
Penn State slashes backup time by 80 percent

the TMS RamSan delivers vastly better IOPS performance than two hundred 15K disk drives
Business challenges
Accelerate nightly backups to meet windows
We literally just turned it on and thats all the performance tuning we did. It just worked out of the box. Theyre very well made and a very mature product. Jason Holmes, Lead System Admin
Solution
Implement flash instead of adding 200 high performance disks
Flash instantly increased perfomance in nightly backups 6x while reducing power consumption by 90 percent!
2013 IBM Corporation 60
Banco Azteca integrates flash into its SAN for increased performance in its credit processing business
Business challenges
Speed up application processing without architectural changes
Solution
Integrate flash seamlessly into the existing infrastructure
Flash integrated seamlessly into a production SAN while delivering an order of magnitude better response time!
Conclusions, Q&A
62
Thank you
63
This is the headline, 22 point Arial - IBM Edge2013 Red
The headline should not be resized or moved The headline should always use lower case, other than the first letter
It should not have more than two lines (which may expand to three lines after translation) When a headline is two lines long, choose a division that is grammatically logical and aesthetically pleasing Ideally, the top line should be moderately longer than the lower line Avoid dividing articles from nouns, prepositions from prepositional phrases, verbs from nouns, etc.
The text above the headline is called the running header, Arial 10pt. Regular This text can be changed in View > Master > Slide Master
Source: If applicable, describe source origin 64 2013 IBM Corporation
The bullets on the page should be clear and concise
Use the Tab key (or increase indent button) to obtain the proper indents and bullets. Use 16 point Arial body text as the minimum type size. The line spacing has been carefully chosen to introduce a balance between text and white space (1 Lines for line spacing, .2 Lines before paragraph spacing) and should be checked for consistency. On a white background, body text should appear in black and should be set in upper and lower case. Where required you can use indents as follows Second level Third level
This template is set to US English throughout
To change the language settings: Make sure you are in normal view View > Normal (from the command menu) Click anywhere in the text box Now select everything by using Edit > Select All or Ctrl A The language can now be set to your local language by using Tools > Language, and selecting the language you require from the available languages. If you want to create a local language version of this template, then you should also set the language on the Slide Master, Title Master, Notes Master and Handout Master as well and save the file as a Document Template. To make it appear as a standard template save it to the location of your MS Office templates, this location varies according to the version of Windows you are using.
Footers
Footers can be used if necessary for dates, confidential material, etc. The Footer text has the standard form <date> and <footer> The contents of the fields <date> and <footer> can be set using the View > Header and Footer command The Edge2013 branding in the lower right corner should be preserved whenever possible, however, it is permissible to remove or hide it on select pages where it interferes with full-page charts, tables, etc. A Section Header template page is included, and can be used to bring more event branding to presentations There are 4 fixed elements on each page which should not be changed The IBM Logo The horizontal rule Page number location The IBM copyright statement
Repeat presentation title here
Sample section header page
68
Basic alignment
This template has the GRID on as a default Use the snap objects to grid to align objects Set to 0.1 inches or 0.254 cm Use drawing guides to help align if needed
Grids help objects to be spaced evenly, aligned and consistent in size First Box Second Box Third Box
B
Fourth Box
C
Fifth Box
Color palette
A color palette has been selected and keyed to basic elements such as headline type in Edge Orange and basic text in black. Hyperlinks have been keyed to blue. Visited hyperlinks have been keyed to purple. There is also a palette for accent colors, including orange, aqua and yellow-green. Other color selections can be made, but should be limited so that our presentations match consistently. The color palettes have been built into the templates (numbers refer to RGB values).
0 0 0
240 78 55
113 191 167
127 28 125
255 207 1
255 100 0
153 0 204

IBM® Edge2013 - Storage Efficiencies Through Virtualization Compression and Flash

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

IBM® Edge2013 - Storage Efficiencies Through Virtualization Compression and Flash

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Richard Swain IT Storage Specialist Friday, May 31, 2013

2013 IBM Corporation

Richard (Rich) Swain IT Storage Specialist

2013 IBM Corporation

2013 IBM Corporation

next goal: a terabit per square inch

2013 IBM Corporation

2013 IBM Corporation

Moore vs Kyder Results

2013 IBM Corporation

2013 IBM Corporation

What does this all mean?

2013 IBM Corporation

2013 IBM Corporation

Whats a Storage hypervisor?

2013 IBM Corporation

Pooled Physical Resources

2013 IBM Corporation

2013 IBM Corporation

2013 IBM Corporation

2013 IBM Corporation

2013 IBM Corporation

IBM Real-time Compression

Primary Storage Efficiency

2013 IBM Corporation

Integrated IBM Real-time Compression

Virtual Servers (VMware)

2013 IBM Corporation

Integrated IBM Real-time Compression

2013 IBM Corporation

Compression Without Compromise VMware

400 300 200 100 0

Measured Score (Performance)

Measured Qos (Response Time)

Measured Score (Performance)

Measured Qos (Response Time)

2013 IBM Corporation

Response Time in Seconds

Compressed 6 Flash Drives

2013 IBM Corporation

Real-time Compression - Performance Differentiation

Much more CPUwork

2013 IBM Corporation

2013 IBM Corporation

Target the bottleneck in the IT stack

CPU speed performance increased

2013 IBM Corporation

2013 IBM Corporation

Flash use cases

End-user experience maximization

Price/performance economics attainment

Developer time optimization

2013 IBM Corporation

85% reduction in batch processing times

90% reduction In OLTP times

25-100 s latency for deterministic performance

80% reduction In energy usage

2013 IBM Corporation

Compare flash performance / efficiency

2013 IBM Corporation

Flash works now

Remove the IO bottleneck!

2013 IBM Corporation