Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Your Story
ucy was feeling confident as she was hitting submit. Her SAT score was in the top quarter for applicants accepted last year. Her GPA was above the median. She was a four-year varsity gymnast on a team that had won the state championship last year. And shed attended a summer program at her first-choice college. Then she got her ding letter. What happened? If you looked inside Lucys file, you would find this summary from the admissions officer who read her application and denied her: Lucy has great test scores but not similarly great grades. That puts her in the mushy middle. Outside of school, Lucy devotes herself to gymnastics. She is team captain and was part of a state championship team last year. In the summers, she has worked in her fathers office. She used her essays to talk about these experiences, but she didnt offer anything more than what I could get from her activities list. Im left with no real impression of who Lucy is, or what she would bring to our community, or why she is so interested in us, especially since we dont have a womens gymnastics program. Theres nothing here that compels me to admit.
22
It turns out that test scores and athletic trophies arent enough to warrant admission, and so Lucy had been relegated to the realm of the LMO (like many others). As you already understand (but she didnt), her credentials werent enough. She needed to consider her application as a whole and use it to tell a coherent and compelling story about herself, but she didnt. Heres the rub: Lucy did in fact have a good story to tell, and if she had told it, she probably would have been admitted.
Your Story
23
And that brings us to two more Ivey Strategies: Ivey Strategy #2: Think like an admissions officer. and Ivey Strategy #3: Tell your story. Why the focus on how admissions officers think? Because at the top US colleges, admissions officers, not faculty (or a computer formula), make the decisions: they are the people who decide your fate. Whether the admissions officers act independently or through a committee, they have the power. Obviously, then, you want to understand how admissions officers think. If you actually use Ivey Strategy #2 and develop an ability to think like an admissions officer, you have a competitive edge. (We are using admissions officers as a generic term here to refer to all the people in the admissions office who have decision-making authority, even if they have different titles such as admissions director or enrollment manager.) How do admissions officers think when it comes to evaluating an application? At top colleges in the United States, admissions officers are evaluating your application (and you) on three dimensions: (1) academic achievements, (2) extracurricular accomplishments (also known as activities), and (3) personal qualities and character. This 3-D evaluation can vary a bit in how it is implemented from college to college, but all three dimensions are always considered in a holistic review, and each relates to an essential aspect of your qualifications and your potential for contribution to the college. The academic rating is an assessment of your academic (and intellectual) abilities and potential. It is a prediction of how you will fare in the classroom and what you will contribute to the academic life at that college. The extracurricular rating is an assessment of what you would accomplish and contribute to the college community beyond the classroom. The personal rating is an assessment of your personal qualities and character. Thats obviously highly subjective, but youd be surprised how often admissions officers see eye-to-eye across various applicants even on the personal dimension. Admissions officers believe that strong personal characteristics are intangible but significant attributes that will contribute to your ultimate success at college.
24
Your Story
25